(* Title: HOL/Tools/Metis/metis_tactic.ML
Author: Kong W. Susanto, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
Author: Lawrence C. Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
Author: Jasmin Blanchette, TU Muenchen
Copyright Cambridge University 2007
HOL setup for the Metis prover.
*)
signature METIS_TACTIC =
sig
val trace : bool Config.T
val verbose : bool Config.T
val new_skolemizer : bool Config.T
val type_has_top_sort : typ -> bool
val metis_tac :
string list -> string -> Proof.context -> thm list -> int -> tactic
val metis_lam_transs : string list
val parse_metis_options : (string list option * string option) parser
val setup : theory -> theory
end
structure Metis_Tactic : METIS_TACTIC =
struct
open ATP_Problem_Generate
open ATP_Proof_Reconstruct
open Metis_Generate
open Metis_Reconstruct
val new_skolemizer =
Attrib.setup_config_bool @{binding metis_new_skolemizer} (K false)
(* Designed to work also with monomorphic instances of polymorphic theorems. *)
fun have_common_thm ths1 ths2 =
exists (member (Term.aconv_untyped o pairself prop_of) ths1)
(map Meson.make_meta_clause ths2)
(*Determining which axiom clauses are actually used*)
fun used_axioms axioms (th, Metis_Proof.Axiom _) = SOME (lookth axioms th)
| used_axioms _ _ = NONE
(* Lightweight predicate type information comes in two flavors, "t = t'" and
"t => t'", where "t" and "t'" are the same term modulo type tags.
In Isabelle, type tags are stripped away, so we are left with "t = t" or
"t => t". Type tag idempotence is also handled this way. *)
fun reflexive_or_trivial_from_metis ctxt type_enc sym_tab concealed mth =
let val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt in
case hol_clause_from_metis ctxt type_enc sym_tab concealed mth of
Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ _ $ t =>
let
val ct = cterm_of thy t
val cT = ctyp_of_term ct
in refl |> Drule.instantiate' [SOME cT] [SOME ct] end
| Const (@{const_name disj}, _) $ t1 $ t2 =>
(if can HOLogic.dest_not t1 then t2 else t1)
|> HOLogic.mk_Trueprop |> cterm_of thy |> Thm.trivial
| _ => raise Fail "expected reflexive or trivial clause"
end
|> Meson.make_meta_clause
fun lam_lifted_from_metis ctxt type_enc sym_tab concealed mth =
let
val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
val tac = rewrite_goals_tac @{thms lambda_def [abs_def]} THEN rtac refl 1
val t = hol_clause_from_metis ctxt type_enc sym_tab concealed mth
val ct = cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop t)
in Goal.prove_internal [] ct (K tac) |> Meson.make_meta_clause end
fun add_vars_and_frees (t $ u) = fold (add_vars_and_frees) [t, u]
| add_vars_and_frees (Abs (_, _, t)) = add_vars_and_frees t
| add_vars_and_frees (t as Var _) = insert (op =) t
| add_vars_and_frees (t as Free _) = insert (op =) t
| add_vars_and_frees _ = I
fun introduce_lam_wrappers ctxt th =
if Meson_Clausify.is_quasi_lambda_free (prop_of th) then
th
else
let
val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
fun conv first ctxt ct =
if Meson_Clausify.is_quasi_lambda_free (term_of ct) then
Thm.reflexive ct
else case term_of ct of
Abs (_, _, u) =>
if first then
case add_vars_and_frees u [] of
[] =>
Conv.abs_conv (conv false o snd) ctxt ct
|> (fn th => Meson.first_order_resolve th @{thm Metis.eq_lambdaI})
| v :: _ =>
Abs (Name.uu, fastype_of v, abstract_over (v, term_of ct)) $ v
|> cterm_of thy
|> Conv.comb_conv (conv true ctxt)
else
Conv.abs_conv (conv false o snd) ctxt ct
| Const (@{const_name Meson.skolem}, _) $ _ => Thm.reflexive ct
| _ => Conv.comb_conv (conv true ctxt) ct
val eq_th = conv true ctxt (cprop_of th)
(* We replace the equation's left-hand side with a beta-equivalent term
so that "Thm.equal_elim" works below. *)
val t0 $ _ $ t2 = prop_of eq_th
val eq_ct = t0 $ prop_of th $ t2 |> cterm_of thy
val eq_th' = Goal.prove_internal [] eq_ct (K (Tactic.rtac eq_th 1))
in Thm.equal_elim eq_th' th end
val clause_params =
{ordering = Metis_KnuthBendixOrder.default,
orderLiterals = Metis_Clause.UnsignedLiteralOrder,
orderTerms = true}
val active_params =
{clause = clause_params,
prefactor = #prefactor Metis_Active.default,
postfactor = #postfactor Metis_Active.default}
val waiting_params =
{symbolsWeight = 1.0,
variablesWeight = 0.0,
literalsWeight = 0.0,
models = []}
val resolution_params = {active = active_params, waiting = waiting_params}
(* Main function to start Metis proof and reconstruction *)
fun FOL_SOLVE (type_enc :: fallback_type_encs) lam_trans ctxt cls ths0 =
let val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
val new_skolemizer =
Config.get ctxt new_skolemizer orelse null (Meson.choice_theorems thy)
val do_lams =
(lam_trans = liftingN orelse lam_trans = lam_liftingN)
? introduce_lam_wrappers ctxt
val th_cls_pairs =
map2 (fn j => fn th =>
(Thm.get_name_hint th,
th |> Drule.eta_contraction_rule
|> Meson_Clausify.cnf_axiom ctxt new_skolemizer
(lam_trans = combsN) j
||> map do_lams))
(0 upto length ths0 - 1) ths0
val ths = maps (snd o snd) th_cls_pairs
val dischargers = map (fst o snd) th_cls_pairs
val cls = cls |> map (Drule.eta_contraction_rule #> do_lams)
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "FOL_SOLVE: CONJECTURE CLAUSES")
val _ = app (fn th => trace_msg ctxt (fn () => Display.string_of_thm ctxt th)) cls
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "type_enc = " ^ type_enc)
val type_enc = type_enc_from_string Strict type_enc
val (sym_tab, axioms, concealed) =
prepare_metis_problem ctxt type_enc lam_trans cls ths
fun get_isa_thm mth Isa_Reflexive_or_Trivial =
reflexive_or_trivial_from_metis ctxt type_enc sym_tab concealed mth
| get_isa_thm mth Isa_Lambda_Lifted =
lam_lifted_from_metis ctxt type_enc sym_tab concealed mth
| get_isa_thm _ (Isa_Raw ith) = ith
val axioms = axioms |> map (fn (mth, ith) => (mth, get_isa_thm mth ith))
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "ISABELLE CLAUSES")
val _ = app (fn (_, ith) => trace_msg ctxt (fn () => Display.string_of_thm ctxt ith)) axioms
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "METIS CLAUSES")
val _ = app (fn (mth, _) => trace_msg ctxt (fn () => Metis_Thm.toString mth)) axioms
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "START METIS PROVE PROCESS")
in
case filter (fn t => prop_of t aconv @{prop False}) cls of
false_th :: _ => [false_th RS @{thm FalseE}]
| [] =>
case Metis_Resolution.new resolution_params
{axioms = axioms |> map fst, conjecture = []}
|> Metis_Resolution.loop of
Metis_Resolution.Contradiction mth =>
let val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "METIS RECONSTRUCTION START: " ^
Metis_Thm.toString mth)
val ctxt' = fold Variable.declare_constraints (map prop_of cls) ctxt
(*add constraints arising from converting goal to clause form*)
val proof = Metis_Proof.proof mth
val result =
axioms
|> fold (replay_one_inference ctxt' type_enc concealed sym_tab) proof
val used = proof |> map_filter (used_axioms axioms)
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "METIS COMPLETED...clauses actually used:")
val _ = app (fn th => trace_msg ctxt (fn () => Display.string_of_thm ctxt th)) used
val names = th_cls_pairs |> map fst
val used_names =
th_cls_pairs
|> map_filter (fn (name, (_, cls)) =>
if have_common_thm used cls then SOME name
else NONE)
val unused_names = names |> subtract (op =) used_names
in
if not (null cls) andalso not (have_common_thm used cls) then
verbose_warning ctxt "The assumptions are inconsistent"
else
();
if not (null unused_names) then
"Unused theorems: " ^ commas_quote unused_names
|> verbose_warning ctxt
else
();
case result of
(_,ith)::_ =>
(trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "Success: " ^ Display.string_of_thm ctxt ith);
[discharge_skolem_premises ctxt dischargers ith])
| _ => (trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "Metis: No result"); [])
end
| Metis_Resolution.Satisfiable _ =>
(trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "Metis: No first-order proof with the lemmas supplied");
if null fallback_type_encs then
()
else
raise METIS ("FOL_SOLVE",
"No first-order proof with the lemmas supplied");
[])
end
handle METIS (loc, msg) =>
case fallback_type_encs of
[] => error ("Failed to replay Metis proof in Isabelle." ^
(if Config.get ctxt verbose then "\n" ^ loc ^ ": " ^ msg
else ""))
| first_fallback :: _ =>
(verbose_warning ctxt
("Falling back on " ^
quote (metis_call first_fallback lam_trans) ^ "...");
FOL_SOLVE fallback_type_encs lam_trans ctxt cls ths0)
fun neg_clausify ctxt combinators =
single
#> Meson.make_clauses_unsorted ctxt
#> combinators ? map Meson_Clausify.introduce_combinators_in_theorem
#> Meson.finish_cnf
fun preskolem_tac ctxt st0 =
(if exists (Meson.has_too_many_clauses ctxt)
(Logic.prems_of_goal (prop_of st0) 1) then
Simplifier.full_simp_tac (Meson_Clausify.ss_only @{thms not_all not_ex}) 1
THEN cnf.cnfx_rewrite_tac ctxt 1
else
all_tac) st0
val type_has_top_sort =
exists_subtype (fn TFree (_, []) => true | TVar (_, []) => true | _ => false)
fun generic_metis_tac type_encs lam_trans ctxt ths i st0 =
let
val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () =>
"Metis called with theorems\n" ^
cat_lines (map (Display.string_of_thm ctxt) ths))
val type_encs = type_encs |> maps unalias_type_enc
fun tac clause =
resolve_tac (FOL_SOLVE type_encs lam_trans ctxt clause ths) 1
in
if exists_type type_has_top_sort (prop_of st0) then
verbose_warning ctxt "Proof state contains the universal sort {}"
else
();
Meson.MESON (preskolem_tac ctxt)
(maps (neg_clausify ctxt (lam_trans = combsN))) tac ctxt i st0
end
fun metis_tac [] = generic_metis_tac partial_type_encs
| metis_tac type_encs = generic_metis_tac type_encs
(* Whenever "X" has schematic type variables, we treat "using X by metis" as
"by (metis X)" to prevent "Subgoal.FOCUS" from freezing the type variables.
We don't do it for nonschematic facts "X" because this breaks a few proofs
(in the rare and subtle case where a proof relied on extensionality not being
applied) and brings few benefits. *)
val has_tvar =
exists_type (exists_subtype (fn TVar _ => true | _ => false)) o prop_of
fun method default_type_encs ((override_type_encs, lam_trans), ths) ctxt facts =
let
val _ =
if default_type_encs = full_type_encs then
legacy_feature "Old \"metisFT\" method -- use \"metis (full_types)\" instead"
else
()
val (schem_facts, nonschem_facts) = List.partition has_tvar facts
val type_encs = override_type_encs |> the_default default_type_encs
val lam_trans = lam_trans |> the_default metis_default_lam_trans
in
HEADGOAL (Method.insert_tac nonschem_facts THEN'
CHANGED_PROP o generic_metis_tac type_encs lam_trans ctxt
(schem_facts @ ths))
end
val metis_lam_transs = [hide_lamsN, liftingN, combsN]
fun set_opt _ x NONE = SOME x
| set_opt get x (SOME x0) =
error ("Cannot specify both " ^ quote (get x0) ^ " and " ^ quote (get x) ^
".")
fun consider_opt s =
if member (op =) metis_lam_transs s then apsnd (set_opt I s)
else apfst (set_opt hd [s])
val parse_metis_options =
Scan.optional
(Args.parens (Parse.short_ident
-- Scan.option (Parse.$$$ "," |-- Parse.short_ident))
>> (fn (s, s') =>
(NONE, NONE) |> consider_opt s
|> (case s' of SOME s' => consider_opt s' | _ => I)))
(NONE, NONE)
fun setup_method (binding, type_encs) =
Scan.lift parse_metis_options -- Attrib.thms >> (METHOD oo method type_encs)
|> Method.setup binding
val setup =
[((@{binding metis}, partial_type_encs),
"Metis for FOL and HOL problems"),
((@{binding metisFT}, full_type_encs),
"Metis for FOL/HOL problems with fully-typed translation")]
|> fold (uncurry setup_method)
end;