(* Title: HOLCF/Bifinite.thy
Author: Brian Huffman
*)
header {* Bifinite domains and approximation *}
theory Bifinite
imports Deflation
begin
subsection {* Omega-profinite and bifinite domains *}
class profinite =
fixes approx :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<rightarrow> 'a"
assumes chain_approx [simp]: "chain approx"
assumes lub_approx_app [simp]: "(\<Squnion>i. approx i\<cdot>x) = x"
assumes approx_idem: "approx i\<cdot>(approx i\<cdot>x) = approx i\<cdot>x"
assumes finite_fixes_approx: "finite {x. approx i\<cdot>x = x}"
class bifinite = profinite + pcpo
lemma approx_below: "approx i\<cdot>x \<sqsubseteq> x"
proof -
have "chain (\<lambda>i. approx i\<cdot>x)" by simp
hence "approx i\<cdot>x \<sqsubseteq> (\<Squnion>i. approx i\<cdot>x)" by (rule is_ub_thelub)
thus "approx i\<cdot>x \<sqsubseteq> x" by simp
qed
lemma finite_deflation_approx: "finite_deflation (approx i)"
proof
fix x :: 'a
show "approx i\<cdot>(approx i\<cdot>x) = approx i\<cdot>x"
by (rule approx_idem)
show "approx i\<cdot>x \<sqsubseteq> x"
by (rule approx_below)
show "finite {x. approx i\<cdot>x = x}"
by (rule finite_fixes_approx)
qed
interpretation approx: finite_deflation "approx i"
by (rule finite_deflation_approx)
lemma (in deflation) deflation: "deflation d" ..
lemma deflation_approx: "deflation (approx i)"
by (rule approx.deflation)
lemma lub_approx [simp]: "(\<Squnion>i. approx i) = (\<Lambda> x. x)"
by (rule ext_cfun, simp add: contlub_cfun_fun)
lemma approx_strict [simp]: "approx i\<cdot>\<bottom> = \<bottom>"
by (rule UU_I, rule approx_below)
lemma approx_approx1:
"i \<le> j \<Longrightarrow> approx i\<cdot>(approx j\<cdot>x) = approx i\<cdot>x"
apply (rule deflation_below_comp1 [OF deflation_approx deflation_approx])
apply (erule chain_mono [OF chain_approx])
done
lemma approx_approx2:
"j \<le> i \<Longrightarrow> approx i\<cdot>(approx j\<cdot>x) = approx j\<cdot>x"
apply (rule deflation_below_comp2 [OF deflation_approx deflation_approx])
apply (erule chain_mono [OF chain_approx])
done
lemma approx_approx [simp]:
"approx i\<cdot>(approx j\<cdot>x) = approx (min i j)\<cdot>x"
apply (rule_tac x=i and y=j in linorder_le_cases)
apply (simp add: approx_approx1 min_def)
apply (simp add: approx_approx2 min_def)
done
lemma finite_image_approx: "finite ((\<lambda>x. approx n\<cdot>x) ` A)"
by (rule approx.finite_image)
lemma finite_range_approx: "finite (range (\<lambda>x. approx i\<cdot>x))"
by (rule approx.finite_range)
lemma compact_approx [simp]: "compact (approx n\<cdot>x)"
by (rule approx.compact)
lemma profinite_compact_eq_approx: "compact x \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>i. approx i\<cdot>x = x"
by (rule admD2, simp_all)
lemma profinite_compact_iff: "compact x \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>n. approx n\<cdot>x = x)"
apply (rule iffI)
apply (erule profinite_compact_eq_approx)
apply (erule exE)
apply (erule subst)
apply (rule compact_approx)
done
lemma approx_induct:
assumes adm: "adm P" and P: "\<And>n x. P (approx n\<cdot>x)"
shows "P x"
proof -
have "P (\<Squnion>n. approx n\<cdot>x)"
by (rule admD [OF adm], simp, simp add: P)
thus "P x" by simp
qed
lemma profinite_below_ext: "(\<And>i. approx i\<cdot>x \<sqsubseteq> approx i\<cdot>y) \<Longrightarrow> x \<sqsubseteq> y"
apply (subgoal_tac "(\<Squnion>i. approx i\<cdot>x) \<sqsubseteq> (\<Squnion>i. approx i\<cdot>y)", simp)
apply (rule lub_mono, simp, simp, simp)
done
subsection {* Instance for product type *}
definition
cprod_map :: "('a \<rightarrow> 'b) \<rightarrow> ('c \<rightarrow> 'd) \<rightarrow> 'a \<times> 'c \<rightarrow> 'b \<times> 'd"
where
"cprod_map = (\<Lambda> f g p. (f\<cdot>(fst p), g\<cdot>(snd p)))"
lemma cprod_map_Pair [simp]: "cprod_map\<cdot>f\<cdot>g\<cdot>(x, y) = (f\<cdot>x, g\<cdot>y)"
unfolding cprod_map_def by simp
lemma cprod_map_ID: "cprod_map\<cdot>ID\<cdot>ID = ID"
unfolding expand_cfun_eq by auto
lemma cprod_map_map:
"cprod_map\<cdot>f1\<cdot>g1\<cdot>(cprod_map\<cdot>f2\<cdot>g2\<cdot>p) =
cprod_map\<cdot>(\<Lambda> x. f1\<cdot>(f2\<cdot>x))\<cdot>(\<Lambda> x. g1\<cdot>(g2\<cdot>x))\<cdot>p"
by (induct p) simp
lemma ep_pair_cprod_map:
assumes "ep_pair e1 p1" and "ep_pair e2 p2"
shows "ep_pair (cprod_map\<cdot>e1\<cdot>e2) (cprod_map\<cdot>p1\<cdot>p2)"
proof
interpret e1p1: ep_pair e1 p1 by fact
interpret e2p2: ep_pair e2 p2 by fact
fix x show "cprod_map\<cdot>p1\<cdot>p2\<cdot>(cprod_map\<cdot>e1\<cdot>e2\<cdot>x) = x"
by (induct x) simp
fix y show "cprod_map\<cdot>e1\<cdot>e2\<cdot>(cprod_map\<cdot>p1\<cdot>p2\<cdot>y) \<sqsubseteq> y"
by (induct y) (simp add: e1p1.e_p_below e2p2.e_p_below)
qed
lemma deflation_cprod_map:
assumes "deflation d1" and "deflation d2"
shows "deflation (cprod_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2)"
proof
interpret d1: deflation d1 by fact
interpret d2: deflation d2 by fact
fix x
show "cprod_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2\<cdot>(cprod_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2\<cdot>x) = cprod_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2\<cdot>x"
by (induct x) (simp add: d1.idem d2.idem)
show "cprod_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2\<cdot>x \<sqsubseteq> x"
by (induct x) (simp add: d1.below d2.below)
qed
lemma finite_deflation_cprod_map:
assumes "finite_deflation d1" and "finite_deflation d2"
shows "finite_deflation (cprod_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2)"
proof (intro finite_deflation.intro finite_deflation_axioms.intro)
interpret d1: finite_deflation d1 by fact
interpret d2: finite_deflation d2 by fact
have "deflation d1" and "deflation d2" by fact+
thus "deflation (cprod_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2)" by (rule deflation_cprod_map)
have "{p. cprod_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2\<cdot>p = p} \<subseteq> {x. d1\<cdot>x = x} \<times> {y. d2\<cdot>y = y}"
by clarsimp
thus "finite {p. cprod_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2\<cdot>p = p}"
by (rule finite_subset, simp add: d1.finite_fixes d2.finite_fixes)
qed
instantiation "*" :: (profinite, profinite) profinite
begin
definition
approx_prod_def:
"approx = (\<lambda>n. cprod_map\<cdot>(approx n)\<cdot>(approx n))"
instance proof
fix i :: nat and x :: "'a \<times> 'b"
show "chain (approx :: nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<times> 'b \<rightarrow> 'a \<times> 'b)"
unfolding approx_prod_def by simp
show "(\<Squnion>i. approx i\<cdot>x) = x"
unfolding approx_prod_def cprod_map_def
by (simp add: lub_distribs thelub_Pair)
show "approx i\<cdot>(approx i\<cdot>x) = approx i\<cdot>x"
unfolding approx_prod_def cprod_map_def by simp
have "{x::'a \<times> 'b. approx i\<cdot>x = x} \<subseteq>
{x::'a. approx i\<cdot>x = x} \<times> {x::'b. approx i\<cdot>x = x}"
unfolding approx_prod_def by clarsimp
thus "finite {x::'a \<times> 'b. approx i\<cdot>x = x}"
by (rule finite_subset,
intro finite_cartesian_product finite_fixes_approx)
qed
end
instance "*" :: (bifinite, bifinite) bifinite ..
lemma approx_Pair [simp]:
"approx i\<cdot>(x, y) = (approx i\<cdot>x, approx i\<cdot>y)"
unfolding approx_prod_def by simp
lemma fst_approx: "fst (approx i\<cdot>p) = approx i\<cdot>(fst p)"
by (induct p, simp)
lemma snd_approx: "snd (approx i\<cdot>p) = approx i\<cdot>(snd p)"
by (induct p, simp)
subsection {* Instance for continuous function space *}
definition
cfun_map :: "('b \<rightarrow> 'a) \<rightarrow> ('c \<rightarrow> 'd) \<rightarrow> ('a \<rightarrow> 'c) \<rightarrow> ('b \<rightarrow> 'd)"
where
"cfun_map = (\<Lambda> a b f x. b\<cdot>(f\<cdot>(a\<cdot>x)))"
lemma cfun_map_beta [simp]: "cfun_map\<cdot>a\<cdot>b\<cdot>f\<cdot>x = b\<cdot>(f\<cdot>(a\<cdot>x))"
unfolding cfun_map_def by simp
lemma cfun_map_ID: "cfun_map\<cdot>ID\<cdot>ID = ID"
unfolding expand_cfun_eq by simp
lemma cfun_map_map:
"cfun_map\<cdot>f1\<cdot>g1\<cdot>(cfun_map\<cdot>f2\<cdot>g2\<cdot>p) =
cfun_map\<cdot>(\<Lambda> x. f2\<cdot>(f1\<cdot>x))\<cdot>(\<Lambda> x. g1\<cdot>(g2\<cdot>x))\<cdot>p"
by (rule ext_cfun) simp
lemma ep_pair_cfun_map:
assumes "ep_pair e1 p1" and "ep_pair e2 p2"
shows "ep_pair (cfun_map\<cdot>p1\<cdot>e2) (cfun_map\<cdot>e1\<cdot>p2)"
proof
interpret e1p1: ep_pair e1 p1 by fact
interpret e2p2: ep_pair e2 p2 by fact
fix f show "cfun_map\<cdot>e1\<cdot>p2\<cdot>(cfun_map\<cdot>p1\<cdot>e2\<cdot>f) = f"
by (simp add: expand_cfun_eq)
fix g show "cfun_map\<cdot>p1\<cdot>e2\<cdot>(cfun_map\<cdot>e1\<cdot>p2\<cdot>g) \<sqsubseteq> g"
apply (rule below_cfun_ext, simp)
apply (rule below_trans [OF e2p2.e_p_below])
apply (rule monofun_cfun_arg)
apply (rule e1p1.e_p_below)
done
qed
lemma deflation_cfun_map:
assumes "deflation d1" and "deflation d2"
shows "deflation (cfun_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2)"
proof
interpret d1: deflation d1 by fact
interpret d2: deflation d2 by fact
fix f
show "cfun_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2\<cdot>(cfun_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2\<cdot>f) = cfun_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2\<cdot>f"
by (simp add: expand_cfun_eq d1.idem d2.idem)
show "cfun_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2\<cdot>f \<sqsubseteq> f"
apply (rule below_cfun_ext, simp)
apply (rule below_trans [OF d2.below])
apply (rule monofun_cfun_arg)
apply (rule d1.below)
done
qed
lemma finite_range_cfun_map:
assumes a: "finite (range (\<lambda>x. a\<cdot>x))"
assumes b: "finite (range (\<lambda>y. b\<cdot>y))"
shows "finite (range (\<lambda>f. cfun_map\<cdot>a\<cdot>b\<cdot>f))" (is "finite (range ?h)")
proof (rule finite_imageD)
let ?f = "\<lambda>g. range (\<lambda>x. (a\<cdot>x, g\<cdot>x))"
show "finite (?f ` range ?h)"
proof (rule finite_subset)
let ?B = "Pow (range (\<lambda>x. a\<cdot>x) \<times> range (\<lambda>y. b\<cdot>y))"
show "?f ` range ?h \<subseteq> ?B"
by clarsimp
show "finite ?B"
by (simp add: a b)
qed
show "inj_on ?f (range ?h)"
proof (rule inj_onI, rule ext_cfun, clarsimp)
fix x f g
assume "range (\<lambda>x. (a\<cdot>x, b\<cdot>(f\<cdot>(a\<cdot>x)))) = range (\<lambda>x. (a\<cdot>x, b\<cdot>(g\<cdot>(a\<cdot>x))))"
hence "range (\<lambda>x. (a\<cdot>x, b\<cdot>(f\<cdot>(a\<cdot>x)))) \<subseteq> range (\<lambda>x. (a\<cdot>x, b\<cdot>(g\<cdot>(a\<cdot>x))))"
by (rule equalityD1)
hence "(a\<cdot>x, b\<cdot>(f\<cdot>(a\<cdot>x))) \<in> range (\<lambda>x. (a\<cdot>x, b\<cdot>(g\<cdot>(a\<cdot>x))))"
by (simp add: subset_eq)
then obtain y where "(a\<cdot>x, b\<cdot>(f\<cdot>(a\<cdot>x))) = (a\<cdot>y, b\<cdot>(g\<cdot>(a\<cdot>y)))"
by (rule rangeE)
thus "b\<cdot>(f\<cdot>(a\<cdot>x)) = b\<cdot>(g\<cdot>(a\<cdot>x))"
by clarsimp
qed
qed
lemma finite_deflation_cfun_map:
assumes "finite_deflation d1" and "finite_deflation d2"
shows "finite_deflation (cfun_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2)"
proof (intro finite_deflation.intro finite_deflation_axioms.intro)
interpret d1: finite_deflation d1 by fact
interpret d2: finite_deflation d2 by fact
have "deflation d1" and "deflation d2" by fact+
thus "deflation (cfun_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2)" by (rule deflation_cfun_map)
have "finite (range (\<lambda>f. cfun_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2\<cdot>f))"
using d1.finite_range d2.finite_range
by (rule finite_range_cfun_map)
thus "finite {f. cfun_map\<cdot>d1\<cdot>d2\<cdot>f = f}"
by (rule finite_range_imp_finite_fixes)
qed
instantiation cfun :: (profinite, profinite) profinite
begin
definition
approx_cfun_def:
"approx = (\<lambda>n. cfun_map\<cdot>(approx n)\<cdot>(approx n))"
instance proof
show "chain (approx :: nat \<Rightarrow> ('a \<rightarrow> 'b) \<rightarrow> ('a \<rightarrow> 'b))"
unfolding approx_cfun_def by simp
next
fix x :: "'a \<rightarrow> 'b"
show "(\<Squnion>i. approx i\<cdot>x) = x"
unfolding approx_cfun_def cfun_map_def
by (simp add: lub_distribs eta_cfun)
next
fix i :: nat and x :: "'a \<rightarrow> 'b"
show "approx i\<cdot>(approx i\<cdot>x) = approx i\<cdot>x"
unfolding approx_cfun_def cfun_map_def by simp
next
fix i :: nat
show "finite {x::'a \<rightarrow> 'b. approx i\<cdot>x = x}"
unfolding approx_cfun_def
by (intro finite_deflation.finite_fixes
finite_deflation_cfun_map
finite_deflation_approx)
qed
end
instance cfun :: (profinite, bifinite) bifinite ..
lemma approx_cfun: "approx n\<cdot>f\<cdot>x = approx n\<cdot>(f\<cdot>(approx n\<cdot>x))"
by (simp add: approx_cfun_def)
end