New unified treatment of sequent calculi by Sara Kalvala
combines the old LK and Modal with the new ILL (Int. Linear Logic)
(* Title: tctical
ID: $Id$
Author: Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
Copyright 1993 University of Cambridge
Tacticals
*)
infix 1 THEN THEN';
infix 0 ORELSE APPEND INTLEAVE ORELSE' APPEND' INTLEAVE';
infix 0 THEN_ELSE;
signature TACTICAL =
sig
type tactic (* = thm -> thm Sequence.seq*)
val all_tac : tactic
val ALLGOALS : (int -> tactic) -> tactic
val APPEND : tactic * tactic -> tactic
val APPEND' : ('a -> tactic) * ('a -> tactic) -> 'a -> tactic
val CHANGED : tactic -> tactic
val COND : (thm -> bool) -> tactic -> tactic -> tactic
val DETERM : tactic -> tactic
val EVERY : tactic list -> tactic
val EVERY' : ('a -> tactic) list -> 'a -> tactic
val EVERY1 : (int -> tactic) list -> tactic
val FILTER : (thm -> bool) -> tactic -> tactic
val FIRST : tactic list -> tactic
val FIRST' : ('a -> tactic) list -> 'a -> tactic
val FIRST1 : (int -> tactic) list -> tactic
val FIRSTGOAL : (int -> tactic) -> tactic
val goals_limit : int ref
val INTLEAVE : tactic * tactic -> tactic
val INTLEAVE' : ('a -> tactic) * ('a -> tactic) -> 'a -> tactic
val METAHYPS : (thm list -> tactic) -> int -> tactic
val no_tac : tactic
val ORELSE : tactic * tactic -> tactic
val ORELSE' : ('a -> tactic) * ('a -> tactic) -> 'a -> tactic
val pause_tac : tactic
val print_tac : tactic
val REPEAT : tactic -> tactic
val REPEAT1 : tactic -> tactic
val REPEAT_DETERM_N : int -> tactic -> tactic
val REPEAT_DETERM : tactic -> tactic
val REPEAT_DETERM1 : tactic -> tactic
val REPEAT_DETERM_FIRST: (int -> tactic) -> tactic
val REPEAT_DETERM_SOME: (int -> tactic) -> tactic
val REPEAT_FIRST : (int -> tactic) -> tactic
val REPEAT_SOME : (int -> tactic) -> tactic
val SELECT_GOAL : tactic -> int -> tactic
val SOMEGOAL : (int -> tactic) -> tactic
val STATE : (thm -> tactic) -> tactic
val strip_context : term -> (string * typ) list * term list * term
val SUBGOAL : ((term*int) -> tactic) -> int -> tactic
val suppress_tracing : bool ref
val THEN : tactic * tactic -> tactic
val THEN' : ('a -> tactic) * ('a -> tactic) -> 'a -> tactic
val THEN_ELSE : tactic * (tactic*tactic) -> tactic
val traced_tac : (thm -> (thm * thm Sequence.seq) option) -> tactic
val tracify : bool ref -> tactic -> thm -> thm Sequence.seq
val trace_REPEAT : bool ref
val TRY : tactic -> tactic
val TRYALL : (int -> tactic) -> tactic
end;
structure Tactical : TACTICAL =
struct
(**** Tactics ****)
(*A tactic maps a proof tree to a sequence of proof trees:
if length of sequence = 0 then the tactic does not apply;
if length > 1 then backtracking on the alternatives can occur.*)
type tactic = thm -> thm Sequence.seq;
(*Makes a tactic from one that uses the components of the state.*)
fun STATE tacfun st = tacfun st st;
(*** LCF-style tacticals ***)
(*the tactical THEN performs one tactic followed by another*)
fun (tac1 THEN tac2) st = Sequence.flats (Sequence.maps tac2 (tac1 st));
(*The tactical ORELSE uses the first tactic that returns a nonempty sequence.
Like in LCF, ORELSE commits to either tac1 or tac2 immediately.
Does not backtrack to tac2 if tac1 was initially chosen. *)
fun (tac1 ORELSE tac2) st =
case Sequence.pull(tac1 st) of
None => tac2 st
| sequencecell => Sequence.seqof(fn()=> sequencecell);
(*The tactical APPEND combines the results of two tactics.
Like ORELSE, but allows backtracking on both tac1 and tac2.
The tactic tac2 is not applied until needed.*)
fun (tac1 APPEND tac2) st =
Sequence.append(tac1 st,
Sequence.seqof(fn()=> Sequence.pull (tac2 st)));
(*Like APPEND, but interleaves results of tac1 and tac2.*)
fun (tac1 INTLEAVE tac2) st =
Sequence.interleave(tac1 st,
Sequence.seqof(fn()=> Sequence.pull (tac2 st)));
(*Conditional tactic.
tac1 ORELSE tac2 = tac1 THEN_ELSE (all_tac, tac2)
tac1 THEN tac2 = tac1 THEN_ELSE (tac2, no_tac)
*)
fun (tac THEN_ELSE (tac1, tac2)) st =
case Sequence.pull(tac st) of
None => tac2 st (*failed; try tactic 2*)
| seqcell => Sequence.flats (*succeeded; use tactic 1*)
(Sequence.maps tac1 (Sequence.seqof(fn()=> seqcell)));
(*Versions for combining tactic-valued functions, as in
SOMEGOAL (resolve_tac rls THEN' assume_tac) *)
fun (tac1 THEN' tac2) x = tac1 x THEN tac2 x;
fun (tac1 ORELSE' tac2) x = tac1 x ORELSE tac2 x;
fun (tac1 APPEND' tac2) x = tac1 x APPEND tac2 x;
fun (tac1 INTLEAVE' tac2) x = tac1 x INTLEAVE tac2 x;
(*passes all proofs through unchanged; identity of THEN*)
fun all_tac st = Sequence.single st;
(*passes no proofs through; identity of ORELSE and APPEND*)
fun no_tac st = Sequence.null;
(*Make a tactic deterministic by chopping the tail of the proof sequence*)
fun DETERM tac st =
case Sequence.pull (tac st) of
None => Sequence.null
| Some(x,_) => Sequence.cons(x, Sequence.null);
(*Conditional tactical: testfun controls which tactic to use next.
Beware: due to eager evaluation, both thentac and elsetac are evaluated.*)
fun COND testfun thenf elsef = (fn prf =>
if testfun prf then thenf prf else elsef prf);
(*Do the tactic or else do nothing*)
fun TRY tac = tac ORELSE all_tac;
(*** List-oriented tactics ***)
(* EVERY [tac1,...,tacn] equals tac1 THEN ... THEN tacn *)
fun EVERY tacs = foldr (op THEN) (tacs, all_tac);
(* EVERY' [tac1,...,tacn] i equals tac1 i THEN ... THEN tacn i *)
fun EVERY' tacs = foldr (op THEN') (tacs, K all_tac);
(*Apply every tactic to 1*)
fun EVERY1 tacs = EVERY' tacs 1;
(* FIRST [tac1,...,tacn] equals tac1 ORELSE ... ORELSE tacn *)
fun FIRST tacs = foldr (op ORELSE) (tacs, no_tac);
(* FIRST' [tac1,...,tacn] i equals tac1 i ORELSE ... ORELSE tacn i *)
fun FIRST' tacs = foldr (op ORELSE') (tacs, K no_tac);
(*Apply first tactic to 1*)
fun FIRST1 tacs = FIRST' tacs 1;
(*** Tracing tactics ***)
(*Max number of goals to print -- set by user*)
val goals_limit = ref 10;
(*Print the current proof state and pass it on.*)
val print_tac =
(fn st =>
(!print_goals_ref (!goals_limit) st; Sequence.single st));
(*Pause until a line is typed -- if non-empty then fail. *)
fun pause_tac st =
(prs"** Press RETURN to continue: ";
if input(std_in,1) = "\n" then Sequence.single st
else (prs"Goodbye\n"; Sequence.null));
exception TRACE_EXIT of thm
and TRACE_QUIT;
(*Tracing flags*)
val trace_REPEAT= ref false
and suppress_tracing = ref false;
(*Handle all tracing commands for current state and tactic *)
fun exec_trace_command flag (tac, st) =
case input_line(std_in) of
"\n" => tac st
| "f\n" => Sequence.null
| "o\n" => (flag:=false; tac st)
| "s\n" => (suppress_tracing:=true; tac st)
| "x\n" => (prs"Exiting now\n"; raise (TRACE_EXIT st))
| "quit\n" => raise TRACE_QUIT
| _ => (prs
"Type RETURN to continue or...\n\
\ f - to fail here\n\
\ o - to switch tracing off\n\
\ s - to suppress tracing until next entry to a tactical\n\
\ x - to exit at this point\n\
\ quit - to abort this tracing run\n\
\** Well? " ; exec_trace_command flag (tac, st));
(*Extract from a tactic, a thm->thm seq function that handles tracing*)
fun tracify flag tac st =
if !flag andalso not (!suppress_tracing)
then (!print_goals_ref (!goals_limit) st;
prs"** Press RETURN to continue: ";
exec_trace_command flag (tac,st))
else tac st;
(*Create a tactic whose outcome is given by seqf, handling TRACE_EXIT*)
fun traced_tac seqf st =
(suppress_tracing := false;
Sequence.seqof (fn()=> seqf st
handle TRACE_EXIT st' => Some(st', Sequence.null)));
(*Deterministic REPEAT: only retains the first outcome;
uses less space than REPEAT; tail recursive.
If non-negative, n bounds the number of repetitions.*)
fun REPEAT_DETERM_N n tac =
let val tac = tracify trace_REPEAT tac
fun drep 0 st = Some(st, Sequence.null)
| drep n st =
(case Sequence.pull(tac st) of
None => Some(st, Sequence.null)
| Some(st',_) => drep (n-1) st')
in traced_tac (drep n) end;
(*Allows any number of repetitions*)
val REPEAT_DETERM = REPEAT_DETERM_N ~1;
(*General REPEAT: maintains a stack of alternatives; tail recursive*)
fun REPEAT tac =
let val tac = tracify trace_REPEAT tac
fun rep qs st =
case Sequence.pull(tac st) of
None => Some(st, Sequence.seqof(fn()=> repq qs))
| Some(st',q) => rep (q::qs) st'
and repq [] = None
| repq(q::qs) = case Sequence.pull q of
None => repq qs
| Some(st,q) => rep (q::qs) st
in traced_tac (rep []) end;
(*Repeat 1 or more times*)
fun REPEAT_DETERM1 tac = DETERM tac THEN REPEAT_DETERM tac;
fun REPEAT1 tac = tac THEN REPEAT tac;
(** Filtering tacticals **)
(*Returns all states satisfying the predicate*)
fun FILTER pred tac st = Sequence.filters pred (tac st);
(*Returns all changed states*)
fun CHANGED tac st =
let fun diff st' = not (eq_thm(st,st'))
in Sequence.filters diff (tac st) end;
(*** Tacticals based on subgoal numbering ***)
(*For n subgoals, performs tac(n) THEN ... THEN tac(1)
Essential to work backwards since tac(i) may add/delete subgoals at i. *)
fun ALLGOALS tac st =
let fun doall 0 = all_tac
| doall n = tac(n) THEN doall(n-1)
in doall(nprems_of st)st end;
(*For n subgoals, performs tac(n) ORELSE ... ORELSE tac(1) *)
fun SOMEGOAL tac st =
let fun find 0 = no_tac
| find n = tac(n) ORELSE find(n-1)
in find(nprems_of st)st end;
(*For n subgoals, performs tac(1) ORELSE ... ORELSE tac(n).
More appropriate than SOMEGOAL in some cases.*)
fun FIRSTGOAL tac st =
let fun find (i,n) = if i>n then no_tac else tac(i) ORELSE find (i+1,n)
in find(1, nprems_of st)st end;
(*Repeatedly solve some using tac. *)
fun REPEAT_SOME tac = REPEAT1 (SOMEGOAL (REPEAT1 o tac));
fun REPEAT_DETERM_SOME tac = REPEAT_DETERM1 (SOMEGOAL (REPEAT_DETERM1 o tac));
(*Repeatedly solve the first possible subgoal using tac. *)
fun REPEAT_FIRST tac = REPEAT1 (FIRSTGOAL (REPEAT1 o tac));
fun REPEAT_DETERM_FIRST tac = REPEAT_DETERM1 (FIRSTGOAL (REPEAT_DETERM1 o tac));
(*For n subgoals, tries to apply tac to n,...1 *)
fun TRYALL tac = ALLGOALS (TRY o tac);
(*Make a tactic for subgoal i, if there is one. *)
fun SUBGOAL goalfun i st =
case drop(i-1, prems_of st) of
[] => Sequence.null
| prem::_ => goalfun (prem,i) st;
(*** SELECT_GOAL ***)
(*Tactical for restricting the effect of a tactic to subgoal i.
Works by making a new state from subgoal i, applying tac to it, and
composing the resulting metathm with the original state.
The "main goal" of the new state will not be atomic, some tactics may fail!
DOES NOT work if tactic affects the main goal other than by instantiation.*)
(*SELECT_GOAL optimization: replace the conclusion by a variable X,
to avoid copying. Proof states have X==concl as an assuption.*)
val prop_equals = cterm_of Sign.proto_pure
(Const("==", propT-->propT-->propT));
fun mk_prop_equals(t,u) = capply (capply prop_equals t) u;
(*Like trivial but returns [ct==X] ct==>X instead of ct==>ct, if possible.
It is paired with a function to undo the transformation. If ct contains
Vars then it returns ct==>ct.*)
fun eq_trivial ct =
let val xfree = cterm_of Sign.proto_pure (Free (gensym"X", propT))
val ct_eq_x = mk_prop_equals (adjust_maxidx ct, xfree)
and refl_ct = reflexive ct
fun restore th =
implies_elim
(forall_elim ct (forall_intr xfree (implies_intr ct_eq_x th)))
refl_ct
in (equal_elim
(combination (combination refl_implies refl_ct) (assume ct_eq_x))
(trivial ct),
restore)
end (*Fails if there are Vars or TVars*)
handle THM _ => (trivial ct, I);
(*Does the work of SELECT_GOAL. *)
fun select tac st0 i =
let val cprem::_ = drop(i-1, cprems_of st0)
val (eq_cprem, restore) = eq_trivial cprem
fun next st = bicompose false (false, restore st, nprems_of st) i st0
in Sequence.flats (Sequence.maps next (tac eq_cprem))
end;
(* (!!x. PROP ?V) ==> PROP ?V ; contains NO TYPE VARIABLES.*)
val dummy_quant_rl =
standard (forall_elim_var 0 (assume
(read_cterm Sign.proto_pure ("!!x::prop. PROP V",propT))));
(* Prevent the subgoal's assumptions from becoming additional subgoals in the
new proof state by enclosing them by a universal quantification *)
fun protect_subgoal st i =
Sequence.hd (bicompose false (false,dummy_quant_rl,1) i st)
handle _ => error"SELECT_GOAL -- impossible error???";
fun SELECT_GOAL tac i st =
case (i, drop(i-1, prems_of st)) of
(_,[]) => Sequence.null
| (1,[_]) => tac st (*If i=1 and only one subgoal do nothing!*)
| (_, (Const("==>",_)$_$_) :: _) => select tac (protect_subgoal st i) i
| (_, _::_) => select tac st i;
(*Strips assumptions in goal yielding ( [x1,...,xm], [H1,...,Hn], B )
H1,...,Hn are the hypotheses; x1...xm are variants of the parameters.
Main difference from strip_assums concerns parameters:
it replaces the bound variables by free variables. *)
fun strip_context_aux (params, Hs, Const("==>", _) $ H $ B) =
strip_context_aux (params, H::Hs, B)
| strip_context_aux (params, Hs, Const("all",_)$Abs(a,T,t)) =
let val (b,u) = variant_abs(a,T,t)
in strip_context_aux ((b,T)::params, Hs, u) end
| strip_context_aux (params, Hs, B) = (rev params, rev Hs, B);
fun strip_context A = strip_context_aux ([],[],A);
(**** METAHYPS -- tactical for using hypotheses as meta-level assumptions
METAHYPS (fn prems => tac prems) i
converts subgoal i, of the form !!x1...xm. [| A1;...;An] ==> A into a new
proof state A==>A, supplying A1,...,An as meta-level assumptions (in
"prems"). The parameters x1,...,xm become free variables. If the
resulting proof state is [| B1;...;Bk] ==> C (possibly assuming A1,...,An)
then it is lifted back into the original context, yielding k subgoals.
Replaces unknowns in the context by Frees having the prefix METAHYP_
New unknowns in [| B1;...;Bk] ==> C are lifted over x1,...,xm.
DOES NOT HANDLE TYPE UNKNOWNS.
****)
local
(*Left-to-right replacements: ctpairs = [...,(vi,ti),...].
Instantiates distinct free variables by terms of same type.*)
fun free_instantiate ctpairs =
forall_elim_list (map snd ctpairs) o forall_intr_list (map fst ctpairs);
fun free_of s ((a,i), T) =
Free(s ^ (case i of 0 => a | _ => a ^ "_" ^ string_of_int i),
T)
fun mk_inst (var as Var(v,T)) = (var, free_of "METAHYP1_" (v,T))
in
fun metahyps_aux_tac tacf (prem,i) state =
let val {sign,maxidx,...} = rep_thm state
val cterm = cterm_of sign
(*find all vars in the hyps -- should find tvars also!*)
val hyps_vars = foldr add_term_vars (Logic.strip_assums_hyp prem, [])
val insts = map mk_inst hyps_vars
(*replace the hyps_vars by Frees*)
val prem' = subst_atomic insts prem
val (params,hyps,concl) = strip_context prem'
val fparams = map Free params
val cparams = map cterm fparams
and chyps = map cterm hyps
val hypths = map assume chyps
fun swap_ctpair (t,u) = (cterm u, cterm t)
(*Subgoal variables: make Free; lift type over params*)
fun mk_subgoal_inst concl_vars (var as Var(v,T)) =
if var mem concl_vars
then (var, true, free_of "METAHYP2_" (v,T))
else (var, false,
free_of "METAHYP2_" (v, map #2 params --->T))
(*Instantiate subgoal vars by Free applied to params*)
fun mk_ctpair (t,in_concl,u) =
if in_concl then (cterm t, cterm u)
else (cterm t, cterm (list_comb (u,fparams)))
(*Restore Vars with higher type and index*)
fun mk_subgoal_swap_ctpair
(t as Var((a,i),_), in_concl, u as Free(_,U)) =
if in_concl then (cterm u, cterm t)
else (cterm u, cterm(Var((a, i+maxidx), U)))
(*Embed B in the original context of params and hyps*)
fun embed B = list_all_free (params, Logic.list_implies (hyps, B))
(*Strip the context using elimination rules*)
fun elim Bhyp = implies_elim_list (forall_elim_list cparams Bhyp) hypths
(*Embed an ff pair in the original params*)
fun embed_ff(t,u) = Logic.mk_flexpair (list_abs_free (params, t),
list_abs_free (params, u))
(*Remove parameter abstractions from the ff pairs*)
fun elim_ff ff = flexpair_abs_elim_list cparams ff
(*A form of lifting that discharges assumptions.*)
fun relift st =
let val prop = #prop(rep_thm st)
val subgoal_vars = (*Vars introduced in the subgoals*)
foldr add_term_vars (Logic.strip_imp_prems prop, [])
and concl_vars = add_term_vars (Logic.strip_imp_concl prop, [])
val subgoal_insts = map (mk_subgoal_inst concl_vars) subgoal_vars
val st' = instantiate ([], map mk_ctpair subgoal_insts) st
val emBs = map (cterm o embed) (prems_of st')
and ffs = map (cterm o embed_ff) (tpairs_of st')
val Cth = implies_elim_list st'
(map (elim_ff o assume) ffs @
map (elim o assume) emBs)
in (*restore the unknowns to the hypotheses*)
free_instantiate (map swap_ctpair insts @
map mk_subgoal_swap_ctpair subgoal_insts)
(*discharge assumptions from state in same order*)
(implies_intr_list (ffs@emBs)
(forall_intr_list cparams (implies_intr_list chyps Cth)))
end
val subprems = map (forall_elim_vars 0) hypths
and st0 = trivial (cterm concl)
(*function to replace the current subgoal*)
fun next st = bicompose false (false, relift st, nprems_of st)
i state
in Sequence.flats (Sequence.maps next (tacf subprems st0))
end;
end;
fun METAHYPS tacf = SUBGOAL (metahyps_aux_tac tacf);
end;
open Tactical;