(* Title: HOL/Decision_Procs/Cooper.thy
Author: Amine Chaieb
*)
section \<open>Presburger arithmetic based on Cooper's algorithm\<close>
theory Cooper
imports
Complex_Main
"HOL-Library.Code_Target_Numeral"
begin
subsection \<open>Basic formulae\<close>
datatype (plugins del: size) num = C int | Bound nat | CN nat int num
| Neg num | Add num num | Sub num num
| Mul int num
instantiation num :: size
begin
primrec size_num :: "num \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
"size_num (C c) = 1"
| "size_num (Bound n) = 1"
| "size_num (Neg a) = 1 + size_num a"
| "size_num (Add a b) = 1 + size_num a + size_num b"
| "size_num (Sub a b) = 3 + size_num a + size_num b"
| "size_num (CN n c a) = 4 + size_num a"
| "size_num (Mul c a) = 1 + size_num a"
instance ..
end
primrec Inum :: "int list \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> int"
where
"Inum bs (C c) = c"
| "Inum bs (Bound n) = bs ! n"
| "Inum bs (CN n c a) = c * (bs ! n) + Inum bs a"
| "Inum bs (Neg a) = - Inum bs a"
| "Inum bs (Add a b) = Inum bs a + Inum bs b"
| "Inum bs (Sub a b) = Inum bs a - Inum bs b"
| "Inum bs (Mul c a) = c * Inum bs a"
datatype (plugins del: size) fm = T | F
| Lt num | Le num | Gt num | Ge num | Eq num | NEq num
| Dvd int num | NDvd int num
| Not fm | And fm fm | Or fm fm | Imp fm fm | Iff fm fm
| E fm | A fm | Closed nat | NClosed nat
instantiation fm :: size
begin
primrec size_fm :: "fm \<Rightarrow> nat"
where
"size_fm (Not p) = 1 + size_fm p"
| "size_fm (And p q) = 1 + size_fm p + size_fm q"
| "size_fm (Or p q) = 1 + size_fm p + size_fm q"
| "size_fm (Imp p q) = 3 + size_fm p + size_fm q"
| "size_fm (Iff p q) = 3 + 2 * (size_fm p + size_fm q)"
| "size_fm (E p) = 1 + size_fm p"
| "size_fm (A p) = 4 + size_fm p"
| "size_fm (Dvd i t) = 2"
| "size_fm (NDvd i t) = 2"
| "size_fm T = 1"
| "size_fm F = 1"
| "size_fm (Lt _) = 1"
| "size_fm (Le _) = 1"
| "size_fm (Gt _) = 1"
| "size_fm (Ge _) = 1"
| "size_fm (Eq _) = 1"
| "size_fm (NEq _) = 1"
| "size_fm (Closed _) = 1"
| "size_fm (NClosed _) = 1"
instance ..
end
lemma fmsize_pos [simp]: "size p > 0"
for p :: fm
by (induct p) simp_all
primrec Ifm :: "bool list \<Rightarrow> int list \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> bool" \<comment> \<open>Semantics of formulae (\<open>fm\<close>)\<close>
where
"Ifm bbs bs T \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "Ifm bbs bs F \<longleftrightarrow> False"
| "Ifm bbs bs (Lt a) \<longleftrightarrow> Inum bs a < 0"
| "Ifm bbs bs (Gt a) \<longleftrightarrow> Inum bs a > 0"
| "Ifm bbs bs (Le a) \<longleftrightarrow> Inum bs a \<le> 0"
| "Ifm bbs bs (Ge a) \<longleftrightarrow> Inum bs a \<ge> 0"
| "Ifm bbs bs (Eq a) \<longleftrightarrow> Inum bs a = 0"
| "Ifm bbs bs (NEq a) \<longleftrightarrow> Inum bs a \<noteq> 0"
| "Ifm bbs bs (Dvd i b) \<longleftrightarrow> i dvd Inum bs b"
| "Ifm bbs bs (NDvd i b) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> i dvd Inum bs b"
| "Ifm bbs bs (Not p) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> Ifm bbs bs p"
| "Ifm bbs bs (And p q) \<longleftrightarrow> Ifm bbs bs p \<and> Ifm bbs bs q"
| "Ifm bbs bs (Or p q) \<longleftrightarrow> Ifm bbs bs p \<or> Ifm bbs bs q"
| "Ifm bbs bs (Imp p q) \<longleftrightarrow> (Ifm bbs bs p \<longrightarrow> Ifm bbs bs q)"
| "Ifm bbs bs (Iff p q) \<longleftrightarrow> Ifm bbs bs p = Ifm bbs bs q"
| "Ifm bbs bs (E p) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x. Ifm bbs (x # bs) p)"
| "Ifm bbs bs (A p) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. Ifm bbs (x # bs) p)"
| "Ifm bbs bs (Closed n) \<longleftrightarrow> bbs ! n"
| "Ifm bbs bs (NClosed n) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> bbs ! n"
fun prep :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
where
"prep (E T) = T"
| "prep (E F) = F"
| "prep (E (Or p q)) = Or (prep (E p)) (prep (E q))"
| "prep (E (Imp p q)) = Or (prep (E (Not p))) (prep (E q))"
| "prep (E (Iff p q)) = Or (prep (E (And p q))) (prep (E (And (Not p) (Not q))))"
| "prep (E (Not (And p q))) = Or (prep (E (Not p))) (prep (E(Not q)))"
| "prep (E (Not (Imp p q))) = prep (E (And p (Not q)))"
| "prep (E (Not (Iff p q))) = Or (prep (E (And p (Not q)))) (prep (E(And (Not p) q)))"
| "prep (E p) = E (prep p)"
| "prep (A (And p q)) = And (prep (A p)) (prep (A q))"
| "prep (A p) = prep (Not (E (Not p)))"
| "prep (Not (Not p)) = prep p"
| "prep (Not (And p q)) = Or (prep (Not p)) (prep (Not q))"
| "prep (Not (A p)) = prep (E (Not p))"
| "prep (Not (Or p q)) = And (prep (Not p)) (prep (Not q))"
| "prep (Not (Imp p q)) = And (prep p) (prep (Not q))"
| "prep (Not (Iff p q)) = Or (prep (And p (Not q))) (prep (And (Not p) q))"
| "prep (Not p) = Not (prep p)"
| "prep (Or p q) = Or (prep p) (prep q)"
| "prep (And p q) = And (prep p) (prep q)"
| "prep (Imp p q) = prep (Or (Not p) q)"
| "prep (Iff p q) = Or (prep (And p q)) (prep (And (Not p) (Not q)))"
| "prep p = p"
lemma prep: "Ifm bbs bs (prep p) = Ifm bbs bs p"
by (induct p arbitrary: bs rule: prep.induct) auto
fun qfree :: "fm \<Rightarrow> bool" \<comment> \<open>Quantifier freeness\<close>
where
"qfree (E p) \<longleftrightarrow> False"
| "qfree (A p) \<longleftrightarrow> False"
| "qfree (Not p) \<longleftrightarrow> qfree p"
| "qfree (And p q) \<longleftrightarrow> qfree p \<and> qfree q"
| "qfree (Or p q) \<longleftrightarrow> qfree p \<and> qfree q"
| "qfree (Imp p q) \<longleftrightarrow> qfree p \<and> qfree q"
| "qfree (Iff p q) \<longleftrightarrow> qfree p \<and> qfree q"
| "qfree p \<longleftrightarrow> True"
subsection \<open>Boundedness and substitution\<close>
primrec numbound0 :: "num \<Rightarrow> bool" \<comment> \<open>a \<open>num\<close> is \<^emph>\<open>independent\<close> of Bound 0\<close>
where
"numbound0 (C c) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "numbound0 (Bound n) \<longleftrightarrow> n > 0"
| "numbound0 (CN n i a) \<longleftrightarrow> n > 0 \<and> numbound0 a"
| "numbound0 (Neg a) \<longleftrightarrow> numbound0 a"
| "numbound0 (Add a b) \<longleftrightarrow> numbound0 a \<and> numbound0 b"
| "numbound0 (Sub a b) \<longleftrightarrow> numbound0 a \<and> numbound0 b"
| "numbound0 (Mul i a) \<longleftrightarrow> numbound0 a"
lemma numbound0_I:
assumes "numbound0 a"
shows "Inum (b # bs) a = Inum (b' # bs) a"
using assms by (induct a rule: num.induct) (auto simp add: gr0_conv_Suc)
primrec bound0 :: "fm \<Rightarrow> bool" \<comment> \<open>a formula is independent of Bound 0\<close>
where
"bound0 T \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "bound0 F \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "bound0 (Lt a) \<longleftrightarrow> numbound0 a"
| "bound0 (Le a) \<longleftrightarrow> numbound0 a"
| "bound0 (Gt a) \<longleftrightarrow> numbound0 a"
| "bound0 (Ge a) \<longleftrightarrow> numbound0 a"
| "bound0 (Eq a) \<longleftrightarrow> numbound0 a"
| "bound0 (NEq a) \<longleftrightarrow> numbound0 a"
| "bound0 (Dvd i a) \<longleftrightarrow> numbound0 a"
| "bound0 (NDvd i a) \<longleftrightarrow> numbound0 a"
| "bound0 (Not p) \<longleftrightarrow> bound0 p"
| "bound0 (And p q) \<longleftrightarrow> bound0 p \<and> bound0 q"
| "bound0 (Or p q) \<longleftrightarrow> bound0 p \<and> bound0 q"
| "bound0 (Imp p q) \<longleftrightarrow> bound0 p \<and> bound0 q"
| "bound0 (Iff p q) \<longleftrightarrow> bound0 p \<and> bound0 q"
| "bound0 (E p) \<longleftrightarrow> False"
| "bound0 (A p) \<longleftrightarrow> False"
| "bound0 (Closed P) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "bound0 (NClosed P) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
lemma bound0_I:
assumes "bound0 p"
shows "Ifm bbs (b # bs) p = Ifm bbs (b' # bs) p"
using assms numbound0_I[where b="b" and bs="bs" and b'="b'"]
by (induct p rule: fm.induct) (auto simp add: gr0_conv_Suc)
fun numsubst0 :: "num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> num"
where
"numsubst0 t (C c) = (C c)"
| "numsubst0 t (Bound n) = (if n = 0 then t else Bound n)"
| "numsubst0 t (CN 0 i a) = Add (Mul i t) (numsubst0 t a)"
| "numsubst0 t (CN n i a) = CN n i (numsubst0 t a)"
| "numsubst0 t (Neg a) = Neg (numsubst0 t a)"
| "numsubst0 t (Add a b) = Add (numsubst0 t a) (numsubst0 t b)"
| "numsubst0 t (Sub a b) = Sub (numsubst0 t a) (numsubst0 t b)"
| "numsubst0 t (Mul i a) = Mul i (numsubst0 t a)"
lemma numsubst0_I: "Inum (b # bs) (numsubst0 a t) = Inum ((Inum (b # bs) a) # bs) t"
by (induct t rule: numsubst0.induct) (auto simp: nth_Cons')
lemma numsubst0_I': "numbound0 a \<Longrightarrow> Inum (b#bs) (numsubst0 a t) = Inum ((Inum (b'#bs) a)#bs) t"
by (induct t rule: numsubst0.induct) (auto simp: nth_Cons' numbound0_I[where b="b" and b'="b'"])
primrec subst0:: "num \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm" \<comment> \<open>substitute a \<open>num\<close> into a formula for Bound 0\<close>
where
"subst0 t T = T"
| "subst0 t F = F"
| "subst0 t (Lt a) = Lt (numsubst0 t a)"
| "subst0 t (Le a) = Le (numsubst0 t a)"
| "subst0 t (Gt a) = Gt (numsubst0 t a)"
| "subst0 t (Ge a) = Ge (numsubst0 t a)"
| "subst0 t (Eq a) = Eq (numsubst0 t a)"
| "subst0 t (NEq a) = NEq (numsubst0 t a)"
| "subst0 t (Dvd i a) = Dvd i (numsubst0 t a)"
| "subst0 t (NDvd i a) = NDvd i (numsubst0 t a)"
| "subst0 t (Not p) = Not (subst0 t p)"
| "subst0 t (And p q) = And (subst0 t p) (subst0 t q)"
| "subst0 t (Or p q) = Or (subst0 t p) (subst0 t q)"
| "subst0 t (Imp p q) = Imp (subst0 t p) (subst0 t q)"
| "subst0 t (Iff p q) = Iff (subst0 t p) (subst0 t q)"
| "subst0 t (Closed P) = (Closed P)"
| "subst0 t (NClosed P) = (NClosed P)"
lemma subst0_I:
assumes "qfree p"
shows "Ifm bbs (b # bs) (subst0 a p) = Ifm bbs (Inum (b # bs) a # bs) p"
using assms numsubst0_I[where b="b" and bs="bs" and a="a"]
by (induct p) (simp_all add: gr0_conv_Suc)
fun decrnum:: "num \<Rightarrow> num"
where
"decrnum (Bound n) = Bound (n - 1)"
| "decrnum (Neg a) = Neg (decrnum a)"
| "decrnum (Add a b) = Add (decrnum a) (decrnum b)"
| "decrnum (Sub a b) = Sub (decrnum a) (decrnum b)"
| "decrnum (Mul c a) = Mul c (decrnum a)"
| "decrnum (CN n i a) = (CN (n - 1) i (decrnum a))"
| "decrnum a = a"
fun decr :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
where
"decr (Lt a) = Lt (decrnum a)"
| "decr (Le a) = Le (decrnum a)"
| "decr (Gt a) = Gt (decrnum a)"
| "decr (Ge a) = Ge (decrnum a)"
| "decr (Eq a) = Eq (decrnum a)"
| "decr (NEq a) = NEq (decrnum a)"
| "decr (Dvd i a) = Dvd i (decrnum a)"
| "decr (NDvd i a) = NDvd i (decrnum a)"
| "decr (Not p) = Not (decr p)"
| "decr (And p q) = And (decr p) (decr q)"
| "decr (Or p q) = Or (decr p) (decr q)"
| "decr (Imp p q) = Imp (decr p) (decr q)"
| "decr (Iff p q) = Iff (decr p) (decr q)"
| "decr p = p"
lemma decrnum:
assumes "numbound0 t"
shows "Inum (x # bs) t = Inum bs (decrnum t)"
using assms by (induct t rule: decrnum.induct) (auto simp add: gr0_conv_Suc)
lemma decr:
assumes assms: "bound0 p"
shows "Ifm bbs (x # bs) p = Ifm bbs bs (decr p)"
using assms by (induct p rule: decr.induct) (simp_all add: gr0_conv_Suc decrnum)
lemma decr_qf: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> qfree (decr p)"
by (induct p) simp_all
fun isatom :: "fm \<Rightarrow> bool" \<comment> \<open>test for atomicity\<close>
where
"isatom T \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "isatom F \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "isatom (Lt a) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "isatom (Le a) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "isatom (Gt a) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "isatom (Ge a) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "isatom (Eq a) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "isatom (NEq a) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "isatom (Dvd i b) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "isatom (NDvd i b) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "isatom (Closed P) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "isatom (NClosed P) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "isatom p \<longleftrightarrow> False"
lemma numsubst0_numbound0:
assumes "numbound0 t"
shows "numbound0 (numsubst0 t a)"
using assms
proof (induct a)
case (CN n)
then show ?case by (cases n) simp_all
qed simp_all
lemma subst0_bound0:
assumes qf: "qfree p"
and nb: "numbound0 t"
shows "bound0 (subst0 t p)"
using qf numsubst0_numbound0[OF nb] by (induct p) auto
lemma bound0_qf: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> qfree p"
by (induct p) simp_all
definition djf :: "('a \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
where
"djf f p q =
(if q = T then T
else if q = F then f p
else
let fp = f p
in case fp of T \<Rightarrow> T | F \<Rightarrow> q | _ \<Rightarrow> Or fp q)"
definition evaldjf :: "('a \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> 'a list \<Rightarrow> fm"
where "evaldjf f ps = foldr (djf f) ps F"
lemma djf_Or: "Ifm bbs bs (djf f p q) = Ifm bbs bs (Or (f p) q)"
by (cases "q=T", simp add: djf_def, cases "q = F", simp add: djf_def)
(cases "f p", simp_all add: Let_def djf_def)
lemma evaldjf_ex: "Ifm bbs bs (evaldjf f ps) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>p \<in> set ps. Ifm bbs bs (f p))"
by (induct ps) (simp_all add: evaldjf_def djf_Or)
lemma evaldjf_bound0:
assumes nb: "\<forall>x\<in> set xs. bound0 (f x)"
shows "bound0 (evaldjf f xs)"
using nb by (induct xs) (auto simp add: evaldjf_def djf_def Let_def, case_tac "f a", auto)
lemma evaldjf_qf:
assumes nb: "\<forall>x\<in> set xs. qfree (f x)"
shows "qfree (evaldjf f xs)"
using nb by (induct xs) (auto simp add: evaldjf_def djf_def Let_def, case_tac "f a", auto)
fun disjuncts :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm list"
where
"disjuncts (Or p q) = disjuncts p @ disjuncts q"
| "disjuncts F = []"
| "disjuncts p = [p]"
lemma disjuncts: "(\<exists>q \<in> set (disjuncts p). Ifm bbs bs q) \<longleftrightarrow> Ifm bbs bs p"
by (induct p rule: disjuncts.induct) auto
lemma disjuncts_nb:
assumes "bound0 p"
shows "\<forall>q \<in> set (disjuncts p). bound0 q"
proof -
from assms have "list_all bound0 (disjuncts p)"
by (induct p rule: disjuncts.induct) auto
then show ?thesis
by (simp only: list_all_iff)
qed
lemma disjuncts_qf:
assumes "qfree p"
shows "\<forall>q \<in> set (disjuncts p). qfree q"
proof -
from assms have "list_all qfree (disjuncts p)"
by (induct p rule: disjuncts.induct) auto
then show ?thesis by (simp only: list_all_iff)
qed
definition DJ :: "(fm \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
where "DJ f p = evaldjf f (disjuncts p)"
lemma DJ:
assumes "\<forall>p q. f (Or p q) = Or (f p) (f q)"
and "f F = F"
shows "Ifm bbs bs (DJ f p) = Ifm bbs bs (f p)"
proof -
have "Ifm bbs bs (DJ f p) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>q \<in> set (disjuncts p). Ifm bbs bs (f q))"
by (simp add: DJ_def evaldjf_ex)
also from assms have "\<dots> = Ifm bbs bs (f p)"
by (induct p rule: disjuncts.induct) auto
finally show ?thesis .
qed
lemma DJ_qf:
assumes "\<forall>p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (f p)"
shows "\<forall>p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (DJ f p) "
proof clarify
fix p
assume qf: "qfree p"
have th: "DJ f p = evaldjf f (disjuncts p)"
by (simp add: DJ_def)
from disjuncts_qf[OF qf] have "\<forall>q \<in> set (disjuncts p). qfree q" .
with assms have th': "\<forall>q \<in> set (disjuncts p). qfree (f q)"
by blast
from evaldjf_qf[OF th'] th show "qfree (DJ f p)"
by simp
qed
lemma DJ_qe:
assumes qe: "\<forall>bs p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (qe p) \<and> Ifm bbs bs (qe p) = Ifm bbs bs (E p)"
shows "\<forall>bs p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (DJ qe p) \<and> Ifm bbs bs ((DJ qe p)) = Ifm bbs bs (E p)"
proof clarify
fix p :: fm
fix bs
assume qf: "qfree p"
from qe have qth: "\<forall>p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (qe p)"
by blast
from DJ_qf[OF qth] qf have qfth: "qfree (DJ qe p)"
by auto
have "Ifm bbs bs (DJ qe p) = (\<exists>q\<in> set (disjuncts p). Ifm bbs bs (qe q))"
by (simp add: DJ_def evaldjf_ex)
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>q \<in> set (disjuncts p). Ifm bbs bs (E q))"
using qe disjuncts_qf[OF qf] by auto
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> Ifm bbs bs (E p)"
by (induct p rule: disjuncts.induct) auto
finally show "qfree (DJ qe p) \<and> Ifm bbs bs (DJ qe p) = Ifm bbs bs (E p)"
using qfth by blast
qed
subsection \<open>Simplification\<close>
text \<open>Algebraic simplifications for nums\<close>
fun bnds :: "num \<Rightarrow> nat list"
where
"bnds (Bound n) = [n]"
| "bnds (CN n c a) = n # bnds a"
| "bnds (Neg a) = bnds a"
| "bnds (Add a b) = bnds a @ bnds b"
| "bnds (Sub a b) = bnds a @ bnds b"
| "bnds (Mul i a) = bnds a"
| "bnds a = []"
fun lex_ns:: "nat list \<Rightarrow> nat list \<Rightarrow> bool"
where
"lex_ns [] ms \<longleftrightarrow> True"
| "lex_ns ns [] \<longleftrightarrow> False"
| "lex_ns (n # ns) (m # ms) \<longleftrightarrow> n < m \<or> (n = m \<and> lex_ns ns ms)"
definition lex_bnd :: "num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> bool"
where "lex_bnd t s = lex_ns (bnds t) (bnds s)"
fun numadd:: "num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> num"
where
"numadd (CN n1 c1 r1) (CN n2 c2 r2) =
(if n1 = n2 then
let c = c1 + c2
in if c = 0 then numadd r1 r2 else CN n1 c (numadd r1 r2)
else if n1 \<le> n2 then CN n1 c1 (numadd r1 (Add (Mul c2 (Bound n2)) r2))
else CN n2 c2 (numadd (Add (Mul c1 (Bound n1)) r1) r2))"
| "numadd (CN n1 c1 r1) t = CN n1 c1 (numadd r1 t)"
| "numadd t (CN n2 c2 r2) = CN n2 c2 (numadd t r2)"
| "numadd (C b1) (C b2) = C (b1 + b2)"
| "numadd a b = Add a b"
lemma numadd: "Inum bs (numadd t s) = Inum bs (Add t s)"
by (induct t s rule: numadd.induct) (simp_all add: Let_def algebra_simps add_eq_0_iff)
lemma numadd_nb: "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 s \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (numadd t s)"
by (induct t s rule: numadd.induct) (simp_all add: Let_def)
fun nummul :: "int \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> num"
where
"nummul i (C j) = C (i * j)"
| "nummul i (CN n c t) = CN n (c * i) (nummul i t)"
| "nummul i t = Mul i t"
lemma nummul: "Inum bs (nummul i t) = Inum bs (Mul i t)"
by (induct t arbitrary: i rule: nummul.induct) (simp_all add: algebra_simps)
lemma nummul_nb: "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (nummul i t)"
by (induct t arbitrary: i rule: nummul.induct) (simp_all add: numadd_nb)
definition numneg :: "num \<Rightarrow> num"
where "numneg t = nummul (- 1) t"
definition numsub :: "num \<Rightarrow> num \<Rightarrow> num"
where "numsub s t = (if s = t then C 0 else numadd s (numneg t))"
lemma numneg: "Inum bs (numneg t) = Inum bs (Neg t)"
using numneg_def nummul by simp
lemma numneg_nb: "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (numneg t)"
using numneg_def nummul_nb by simp
lemma numsub: "Inum bs (numsub a b) = Inum bs (Sub a b)"
using numneg numadd numsub_def by simp
lemma numsub_nb: "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 s \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (numsub t s)"
using numsub_def numadd_nb numneg_nb by simp
fun simpnum :: "num \<Rightarrow> num"
where
"simpnum (C j) = C j"
| "simpnum (Bound n) = CN n 1 (C 0)"
| "simpnum (Neg t) = numneg (simpnum t)"
| "simpnum (Add t s) = numadd (simpnum t) (simpnum s)"
| "simpnum (Sub t s) = numsub (simpnum t) (simpnum s)"
| "simpnum (Mul i t) = (if i = 0 then C 0 else nummul i (simpnum t))"
| "simpnum t = t"
lemma simpnum_ci: "Inum bs (simpnum t) = Inum bs t"
by (induct t rule: simpnum.induct) (auto simp add: numneg numadd numsub nummul)
lemma simpnum_numbound0: "numbound0 t \<Longrightarrow> numbound0 (simpnum t)"
by (induct t rule: simpnum.induct) (auto simp add: numadd_nb numsub_nb nummul_nb numneg_nb)
fun not :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
where
"not (Not p) = p"
| "not T = F"
| "not F = T"
| "not p = Not p"
lemma not: "Ifm bbs bs (not p) = Ifm bbs bs (Not p)"
by (cases p) auto
lemma not_qf: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> qfree (not p)"
by (cases p) auto
lemma not_bn: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (not p)"
by (cases p) auto
definition conj :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
where "conj p q =
(if p = F \<or> q = F then F
else if p = T then q
else if q = T then p
else And p q)"
lemma conj: "Ifm bbs bs (conj p q) = Ifm bbs bs (And p q)"
by (cases "p = F \<or> q = F", simp_all add: conj_def) (cases p, simp_all)
lemma conj_qf: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> qfree q \<Longrightarrow> qfree (conj p q)"
using conj_def by auto
lemma conj_nb: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> bound0 q \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (conj p q)"
using conj_def by auto
definition disj :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
where "disj p q =
(if p = T \<or> q = T then T
else if p = F then q
else if q = F then p
else Or p q)"
lemma disj: "Ifm bbs bs (disj p q) = Ifm bbs bs (Or p q)"
by (cases "p = T \<or> q = T", simp_all add: disj_def) (cases p, simp_all)
lemma disj_qf: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> qfree q \<Longrightarrow> qfree (disj p q)"
using disj_def by auto
lemma disj_nb: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> bound0 q \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (disj p q)"
using disj_def by auto
definition imp :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
where "imp p q =
(if p = F \<or> q = T then T
else if p = T then q
else if q = F then not p
else Imp p q)"
lemma imp: "Ifm bbs bs (imp p q) = Ifm bbs bs (Imp p q)"
by (cases "p = F \<or> q = T", simp_all add: imp_def, cases p) (simp_all add: not)
lemma imp_qf: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> qfree q \<Longrightarrow> qfree (imp p q)"
using imp_def by (cases "p = F \<or> q = T", simp_all add: imp_def, cases p) (simp_all add: not_qf)
lemma imp_nb: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> bound0 q \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (imp p q)"
using imp_def by (cases "p = F \<or> q = T", simp_all add: imp_def, cases p) simp_all
definition iff :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
where "iff p q =
(if p = q then T
else if p = not q \<or> not p = q then F
else if p = F then not q
else if q = F then not p
else if p = T then q
else if q = T then p
else Iff p q)"
lemma iff: "Ifm bbs bs (iff p q) = Ifm bbs bs (Iff p q)"
by (unfold iff_def, cases "p = q", simp, cases "p = not q", simp add: not)
(cases "not p = q", auto simp add: not)
lemma iff_qf: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> qfree q \<Longrightarrow> qfree (iff p q)"
by (unfold iff_def, cases "p = q", auto simp add: not_qf)
lemma iff_nb: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> bound0 q \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (iff p q)"
using iff_def by (unfold iff_def, cases "p = q", auto simp add: not_bn)
fun simpfm :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
where
"simpfm (And p q) = conj (simpfm p) (simpfm q)"
| "simpfm (Or p q) = disj (simpfm p) (simpfm q)"
| "simpfm (Imp p q) = imp (simpfm p) (simpfm q)"
| "simpfm (Iff p q) = iff (simpfm p) (simpfm q)"
| "simpfm (Not p) = not (simpfm p)"
| "simpfm (Lt a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if v < 0 then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Lt a')"
| "simpfm (Le a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if v \<le> 0 then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Le a')"
| "simpfm (Gt a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if v > 0 then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Gt a')"
| "simpfm (Ge a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if v \<ge> 0 then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Ge a')"
| "simpfm (Eq a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if v = 0 then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Eq a')"
| "simpfm (NEq a) = (let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if v \<noteq> 0 then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> NEq a')"
| "simpfm (Dvd i a) =
(if i = 0 then simpfm (Eq a)
else if \<bar>i\<bar> = 1 then T
else let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if i dvd v then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> Dvd i a')"
| "simpfm (NDvd i a) =
(if i = 0 then simpfm (NEq a)
else if \<bar>i\<bar> = 1 then F
else let a' = simpnum a in case a' of C v \<Rightarrow> if \<not>( i dvd v) then T else F | _ \<Rightarrow> NDvd i a')"
| "simpfm p = p"
lemma simpfm: "Ifm bbs bs (simpfm p) = Ifm bbs bs p"
proof (induct p rule: simpfm.induct)
case (6 a)
let ?sa = "simpnum a"
from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a"
by simp
consider v where "?sa = C v" | "\<not> (\<exists>v. ?sa = C v)" by blast
then show ?case
proof cases
case 1
with sa show ?thesis by simp
next
case 2
with sa show ?thesis by (cases ?sa) (simp_all add: Let_def)
qed
next
case (7 a)
let ?sa = "simpnum a"
from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a"
by simp
consider v where "?sa = C v" | "\<not> (\<exists>v. ?sa = C v)" by blast
then show ?case
proof cases
case 1
with sa show ?thesis by simp
next
case 2
with sa show ?thesis by (cases ?sa) (simp_all add: Let_def)
qed
next
case (8 a)
let ?sa = "simpnum a"
from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a"
by simp
consider v where "?sa = C v" | "\<not> (\<exists>v. ?sa = C v)" by blast
then show ?case
proof cases
case 1
with sa show ?thesis by simp
next
case 2
with sa show ?thesis by (cases ?sa) (simp_all add: Let_def)
qed
next
case (9 a)
let ?sa = "simpnum a"
from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a"
by simp
consider v where "?sa = C v" | "\<not> (\<exists>v. ?sa = C v)" by blast
then show ?case
proof cases
case 1
with sa show ?thesis by simp
next
case 2
with sa show ?thesis by (cases ?sa) (simp_all add: Let_def)
qed
next
case (10 a)
let ?sa = "simpnum a"
from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a"
by simp
consider v where "?sa = C v" | "\<not> (\<exists>v. ?sa = C v)" by blast
then show ?case
proof cases
case 1
with sa show ?thesis by simp
next
case 2
with sa show ?thesis by (cases ?sa) (simp_all add: Let_def)
qed
next
case (11 a)
let ?sa = "simpnum a"
from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a"
by simp
consider v where "?sa = C v" | "\<not> (\<exists>v. ?sa = C v)" by blast
then show ?case
proof cases
case 1
with sa show ?thesis by simp
next
case 2
with sa show ?thesis by (cases ?sa) (simp_all add: Let_def)
qed
next
case (12 i a)
let ?sa = "simpnum a"
from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a"
by simp
consider "i = 0" | "\<bar>i\<bar> = 1" | "i \<noteq> 0" "\<bar>i\<bar> \<noteq> 1" by blast
then show ?case
proof cases
case 1
then show ?thesis
using "12.hyps" by (simp add: dvd_def Let_def)
next
case 2
with one_dvd[of "Inum bs a"] uminus_dvd_conv[where d="1" and t="Inum bs a"]
show ?thesis
apply (cases "i = 0")
apply (simp_all add: Let_def)
apply (cases "i > 0")
apply simp_all
done
next
case i: 3
consider v where "?sa = C v" | "\<not> (\<exists>v. ?sa = C v)" by blast
then show ?thesis
proof cases
case 1
with sa[symmetric] i show ?thesis
by (cases "\<bar>i\<bar> = 1") auto
next
case 2
then have "simpfm (Dvd i a) = Dvd i ?sa"
using i by (cases ?sa) (auto simp add: Let_def)
with sa show ?thesis by simp
qed
qed
next
case (13 i a)
let ?sa = "simpnum a"
from simpnum_ci have sa: "Inum bs ?sa = Inum bs a"
by simp
consider "i = 0" | "\<bar>i\<bar> = 1" | "i \<noteq> 0" "\<bar>i\<bar> \<noteq> 1" by blast
then show ?case
proof cases
case 1
then show ?thesis
using "13.hyps" by (simp add: dvd_def Let_def)
next
case 2
with one_dvd[of "Inum bs a"] uminus_dvd_conv[where d="1" and t="Inum bs a"]
show ?thesis
apply (cases "i = 0")
apply (simp_all add: Let_def)
apply (cases "i > 0")
apply simp_all
done
next
case i: 3
consider v where "?sa = C v" | "\<not> (\<exists>v. ?sa = C v)" by blast
then show ?thesis
proof cases
case 1
with sa[symmetric] i show ?thesis
by (cases "\<bar>i\<bar> = 1") auto
next
case 2
then have "simpfm (NDvd i a) = NDvd i ?sa"
using i by (cases ?sa) (auto simp add: Let_def)
with sa show ?thesis by simp
qed
qed
qed (simp_all add: conj disj imp iff not)
lemma simpfm_bound0: "bound0 p \<Longrightarrow> bound0 (simpfm p)"
proof (induct p rule: simpfm.induct)
case (6 a)
then have nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
then have "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
then show ?case by (cases "simpnum a") (auto simp add: Let_def)
next
case (7 a)
then have nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
then have "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
then show ?case by (cases "simpnum a") (auto simp add: Let_def)
next
case (8 a)
then have nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
then have "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
then show ?case by (cases "simpnum a") (auto simp add: Let_def)
next
case (9 a)
then have nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
then have "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
then show ?case by (cases "simpnum a") (auto simp add: Let_def)
next
case (10 a)
then have nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
then have "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
then show ?case by (cases "simpnum a") (auto simp add: Let_def)
next
case (11 a)
then have nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
then have "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
then show ?case by (cases "simpnum a") (auto simp add: Let_def)
next
case (12 i a)
then have nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
then have "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
then show ?case by (cases "simpnum a") (auto simp add: Let_def)
next
case (13 i a)
then have nb: "numbound0 a" by simp
then have "numbound0 (simpnum a)" by (simp only: simpnum_numbound0[OF nb])
then show ?case by (cases "simpnum a") (auto simp add: Let_def)
qed (auto simp add: disj_def imp_def iff_def conj_def not_bn)
lemma simpfm_qf: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> qfree (simpfm p)"
apply (induct p rule: simpfm.induct)
apply (auto simp add: disj_qf imp_qf iff_qf conj_qf not_qf Let_def)
apply (case_tac "simpnum a", auto)+
done
subsection \<open>Generic quantifier elimination\<close>
fun qelim :: "fm \<Rightarrow> (fm \<Rightarrow> fm) \<Rightarrow> fm"
where
"qelim (E p) = (\<lambda>qe. DJ qe (qelim p qe))"
| "qelim (A p) = (\<lambda>qe. not (qe ((qelim (Not p) qe))))"
| "qelim (Not p) = (\<lambda>qe. not (qelim p qe))"
| "qelim (And p q) = (\<lambda>qe. conj (qelim p qe) (qelim q qe))"
| "qelim (Or p q) = (\<lambda>qe. disj (qelim p qe) (qelim q qe))"
| "qelim (Imp p q) = (\<lambda>qe. imp (qelim p qe) (qelim q qe))"
| "qelim (Iff p q) = (\<lambda>qe. iff (qelim p qe) (qelim q qe))"
| "qelim p = (\<lambda>y. simpfm p)"
lemma qelim_ci:
assumes qe_inv: "\<forall>bs p. qfree p \<longrightarrow> qfree (qe p) \<and> Ifm bbs bs (qe p) = Ifm bbs bs (E p)"
shows "\<And>bs. qfree (qelim p qe) \<and> Ifm bbs bs (qelim p qe) = Ifm bbs bs p"
using qe_inv DJ_qe[OF qe_inv]
by (induct p rule: qelim.induct)
(auto simp add: not disj conj iff imp not_qf disj_qf conj_qf imp_qf iff_qf
simpfm simpfm_qf simp del: simpfm.simps)
text \<open>Linearity for fm where Bound 0 ranges over \<open>\<int>\<close>\<close>
fun zsplit0 :: "num \<Rightarrow> int \<times> num" \<comment> \<open>splits the bounded from the unbounded part\<close>
where
"zsplit0 (C c) = (0, C c)"
| "zsplit0 (Bound n) = (if n = 0 then (1, C 0) else (0, Bound n))"
| "zsplit0 (CN n i a) =
(let (i', a') = zsplit0 a
in if n = 0 then (i + i', a') else (i', CN n i a'))"
| "zsplit0 (Neg a) = (let (i', a') = zsplit0 a in (-i', Neg a'))"
| "zsplit0 (Add a b) =
(let
(ia, a') = zsplit0 a;
(ib, b') = zsplit0 b
in (ia + ib, Add a' b'))"
| "zsplit0 (Sub a b) =
(let
(ia, a') = zsplit0 a;
(ib, b') = zsplit0 b
in (ia - ib, Sub a' b'))"
| "zsplit0 (Mul i a) = (let (i', a') = zsplit0 a in (i*i', Mul i a'))"
lemma zsplit0_I:
"\<And>n a. zsplit0 t = (n, a) \<Longrightarrow>
(Inum ((x::int) # bs) (CN 0 n a) = Inum (x # bs) t) \<and> numbound0 a"
(is "\<And>n a. ?S t = (n,a) \<Longrightarrow> (?I x (CN 0 n a) = ?I x t) \<and> ?N a")
proof (induct t rule: zsplit0.induct)
case (1 c n a)
then show ?case by auto
next
case (2 m n a)
then show ?case by (cases "m = 0") auto
next
case (3 m i a n a')
let ?j = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
let ?b = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
have abj: "zsplit0 a = (?j, ?b)" by simp
show ?case
proof (cases "m = 0")
case False
with 3(1)[OF abj] 3(2) show ?thesis
by (auto simp add: Let_def split_def)
next
case m: True
with abj have th: "a' = ?b \<and> n = i + ?j"
using 3 by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
from abj 3 m have th2: "(?I x (CN 0 ?j ?b) = ?I x a) \<and> ?N ?b"
by blast
from th have "?I x (CN 0 n a') = ?I x (CN 0 (i + ?j) ?b)"
by simp
also from th2 have "\<dots> = ?I x (CN 0 i (CN 0 ?j ?b))"
by (simp add: distrib_right)
finally have "?I x (CN 0 n a') = ?I x (CN 0 i a)"
using th2 by simp
with th2 th m show ?thesis
by blast
qed
next
case (4 t n a)
let ?nt = "fst (zsplit0 t)"
let ?at = "snd (zsplit0 t)"
have abj: "zsplit0 t = (?nt, ?at)"
by simp
then have th: "a = Neg ?at \<and> n = - ?nt"
using 4 by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
from abj 4 have th2: "(?I x (CN 0 ?nt ?at) = ?I x t) \<and> ?N ?at"
by blast
from th2[simplified] th[simplified] show ?case
by simp
next
case (5 s t n a)
let ?ns = "fst (zsplit0 s)"
let ?as = "snd (zsplit0 s)"
let ?nt = "fst (zsplit0 t)"
let ?at = "snd (zsplit0 t)"
have abjs: "zsplit0 s = (?ns, ?as)"
by simp
moreover have abjt: "zsplit0 t = (?nt, ?at)"
by simp
ultimately have th: "a = Add ?as ?at \<and> n = ?ns + ?nt"
using 5 by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
from abjs[symmetric] have bluddy: "\<exists>x y. (x, y) = zsplit0 s"
by blast
from 5 have "(\<exists>x y. (x, y) = zsplit0 s) \<longrightarrow>
(\<forall>xa xb. zsplit0 t = (xa, xb) \<longrightarrow> Inum (x # bs) (CN 0 xa xb) = Inum (x # bs) t \<and> numbound0 xb)"
by auto
with bluddy abjt have th3: "(?I x (CN 0 ?nt ?at) = ?I x t) \<and> ?N ?at"
by blast
from abjs 5 have th2: "(?I x (CN 0 ?ns ?as) = ?I x s) \<and> ?N ?as"
by blast
from th3[simplified] th2[simplified] th[simplified] show ?case
by (simp add: distrib_right)
next
case (6 s t n a)
let ?ns = "fst (zsplit0 s)"
let ?as = "snd (zsplit0 s)"
let ?nt = "fst (zsplit0 t)"
let ?at = "snd (zsplit0 t)"
have abjs: "zsplit0 s = (?ns, ?as)"
by simp
moreover have abjt: "zsplit0 t = (?nt, ?at)"
by simp
ultimately have th: "a = Sub ?as ?at \<and> n = ?ns - ?nt"
using 6 by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
from abjs[symmetric] have bluddy: "\<exists>x y. (x, y) = zsplit0 s"
by blast
from 6 have "(\<exists>x y. (x,y) = zsplit0 s) \<longrightarrow>
(\<forall>xa xb. zsplit0 t = (xa, xb) \<longrightarrow> Inum (x # bs) (CN 0 xa xb) = Inum (x # bs) t \<and> numbound0 xb)"
by auto
with bluddy abjt have th3: "(?I x (CN 0 ?nt ?at) = ?I x t) \<and> ?N ?at"
by blast
from abjs 6 have th2: "(?I x (CN 0 ?ns ?as) = ?I x s) \<and> ?N ?as"
by blast
from th3[simplified] th2[simplified] th[simplified] show ?case
by (simp add: left_diff_distrib)
next
case (7 i t n a)
let ?nt = "fst (zsplit0 t)"
let ?at = "snd (zsplit0 t)"
have abj: "zsplit0 t = (?nt,?at)"
by simp
then have th: "a = Mul i ?at \<and> n = i * ?nt"
using 7 by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
from abj 7 have th2: "(?I x (CN 0 ?nt ?at) = ?I x t) \<and> ?N ?at"
by blast
then have "?I x (Mul i t) = i * ?I x (CN 0 ?nt ?at)"
by simp
also have "\<dots> = ?I x (CN 0 (i*?nt) (Mul i ?at))"
by (simp add: distrib_left)
finally show ?case using th th2
by simp
qed
fun iszlfm :: "fm \<Rightarrow> bool" \<comment> \<open>linearity test for fm\<close>
where
"iszlfm (And p q) \<longleftrightarrow> iszlfm p \<and> iszlfm q"
| "iszlfm (Or p q) \<longleftrightarrow> iszlfm p \<and> iszlfm q"
| "iszlfm (Eq (CN 0 c e)) \<longleftrightarrow> c > 0 \<and> numbound0 e"
| "iszlfm (NEq (CN 0 c e)) \<longleftrightarrow> c > 0 \<and> numbound0 e"
| "iszlfm (Lt (CN 0 c e)) \<longleftrightarrow> c > 0 \<and> numbound0 e"
| "iszlfm (Le (CN 0 c e)) \<longleftrightarrow> c > 0 \<and> numbound0 e"
| "iszlfm (Gt (CN 0 c e)) \<longleftrightarrow> c > 0 \<and> numbound0 e"
| "iszlfm (Ge (CN 0 c e)) \<longleftrightarrow> c > 0 \<and> numbound0 e"
| "iszlfm (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) \<longleftrightarrow> c > 0 \<and> i > 0 \<and> numbound0 e"
| "iszlfm (NDvd i (CN 0 c e)) \<longleftrightarrow> c > 0 \<and> i > 0 \<and> numbound0 e"
| "iszlfm p \<longleftrightarrow> isatom p \<and> bound0 p"
lemma zlin_qfree: "iszlfm p \<Longrightarrow> qfree p"
by (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct) auto
fun zlfm :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm" \<comment> \<open>linearity transformation for fm\<close>
where
"zlfm (And p q) = And (zlfm p) (zlfm q)"
| "zlfm (Or p q) = Or (zlfm p) (zlfm q)"
| "zlfm (Imp p q) = Or (zlfm (Not p)) (zlfm q)"
| "zlfm (Iff p q) = Or (And (zlfm p) (zlfm q)) (And (zlfm (Not p)) (zlfm (Not q)))"
| "zlfm (Lt a) =
(let (c, r) = zsplit0 a in
if c = 0 then Lt r else
if c > 0 then (Lt (CN 0 c r))
else Gt (CN 0 (- c) (Neg r)))"
| "zlfm (Le a) =
(let (c, r) = zsplit0 a in
if c = 0 then Le r
else if c > 0 then Le (CN 0 c r)
else Ge (CN 0 (- c) (Neg r)))"
| "zlfm (Gt a) =
(let (c, r) = zsplit0 a in
if c = 0 then Gt r else
if c > 0 then Gt (CN 0 c r)
else Lt (CN 0 (- c) (Neg r)))"
| "zlfm (Ge a) =
(let (c, r) = zsplit0 a in
if c = 0 then Ge r
else if c > 0 then Ge (CN 0 c r)
else Le (CN 0 (- c) (Neg r)))"
| "zlfm (Eq a) =
(let (c, r) = zsplit0 a in
if c = 0 then Eq r
else if c > 0 then Eq (CN 0 c r)
else Eq (CN 0 (- c) (Neg r)))"
| "zlfm (NEq a) =
(let (c, r) = zsplit0 a in
if c = 0 then NEq r
else if c > 0 then NEq (CN 0 c r)
else NEq (CN 0 (- c) (Neg r)))"
| "zlfm (Dvd i a) =
(if i = 0 then zlfm (Eq a)
else
let (c, r) = zsplit0 a in
if c = 0 then Dvd \<bar>i\<bar> r
else if c > 0 then Dvd \<bar>i\<bar> (CN 0 c r)
else Dvd \<bar>i\<bar> (CN 0 (- c) (Neg r)))"
| "zlfm (NDvd i a) =
(if i = 0 then zlfm (NEq a)
else
let (c, r) = zsplit0 a in
if c = 0 then NDvd \<bar>i\<bar> r
else if c > 0 then NDvd \<bar>i\<bar> (CN 0 c r)
else NDvd \<bar>i\<bar> (CN 0 (- c) (Neg r)))"
| "zlfm (Not (And p q)) = Or (zlfm (Not p)) (zlfm (Not q))"
| "zlfm (Not (Or p q)) = And (zlfm (Not p)) (zlfm (Not q))"
| "zlfm (Not (Imp p q)) = And (zlfm p) (zlfm (Not q))"
| "zlfm (Not (Iff p q)) = Or (And(zlfm p) (zlfm(Not q))) (And (zlfm(Not p)) (zlfm q))"
| "zlfm (Not (Not p)) = zlfm p"
| "zlfm (Not T) = F"
| "zlfm (Not F) = T"
| "zlfm (Not (Lt a)) = zlfm (Ge a)"
| "zlfm (Not (Le a)) = zlfm (Gt a)"
| "zlfm (Not (Gt a)) = zlfm (Le a)"
| "zlfm (Not (Ge a)) = zlfm (Lt a)"
| "zlfm (Not (Eq a)) = zlfm (NEq a)"
| "zlfm (Not (NEq a)) = zlfm (Eq a)"
| "zlfm (Not (Dvd i a)) = zlfm (NDvd i a)"
| "zlfm (Not (NDvd i a)) = zlfm (Dvd i a)"
| "zlfm (Not (Closed P)) = NClosed P"
| "zlfm (Not (NClosed P)) = Closed P"
| "zlfm p = p"
lemma zlfm_I:
assumes qfp: "qfree p"
shows "Ifm bbs (i # bs) (zlfm p) = Ifm bbs (i # bs) p \<and> iszlfm (zlfm p)"
(is "?I (?l p) = ?I p \<and> ?L (?l p)")
using qfp
proof (induct p rule: zlfm.induct)
case (5 a)
let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c, ?r)"
by simp
from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
have Ia: "Inum (i # bs) a = Inum (i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r"
by auto
let ?N = "\<lambda>t. Inum (i # bs) t"
from 5 Ia nb show ?case
apply (auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps)
apply (cases "?r")
apply auto
subgoal for nat a b by (cases nat) auto
done
next
case (6 a)
let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c, ?r)"
by simp
from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
have Ia: "Inum (i # bs) a = Inum (i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r"
by auto
let ?N = "\<lambda>t. Inum (i # bs) t"
from 6 Ia nb show ?case
apply (auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps)
apply (cases "?r")
apply auto
subgoal for nat a b by (cases nat) auto
done
next
case (7 a)
let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c, ?r)"
by simp
from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
have Ia: "Inum (i # bs) a = Inum (i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r"
by auto
let ?N = "\<lambda>t. Inum (i # bs) t"
from 7 Ia nb show ?case
apply (auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps)
apply (cases "?r")
apply auto
subgoal for nat a b by (cases nat) auto
done
next
case (8 a)
let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c, ?r)"
by simp
from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
have Ia: "Inum (i # bs) a = Inum (i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r"
by auto
let ?N = "\<lambda>t. Inum (i # bs) t"
from 8 Ia nb show ?case
apply (auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps)
apply (cases "?r")
apply auto
subgoal for nat a b by (cases nat) auto
done
next
case (9 a)
let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c, ?r)"
by simp
from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
have Ia:"Inum (i # bs) a = Inum (i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r"
by auto
let ?N = "\<lambda>t. Inum (i # bs) t"
from 9 Ia nb show ?case
apply (auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps)
apply (cases "?r")
apply auto
subgoal for nat a b by (cases nat) auto
done
next
case (10 a)
let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c, ?r)"
by simp
from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
have Ia: "Inum (i # bs) a = Inum (i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r"
by auto
let ?N = "\<lambda>t. Inum (i # bs) t"
from 10 Ia nb show ?case
apply (auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps)
apply (cases "?r")
apply auto
subgoal for nat a b by (cases nat) auto
done
next
case (11 j a)
let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c,?r)"
by simp
from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
have Ia: "Inum (i # bs) a = Inum (i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r"
by auto
let ?N = "\<lambda>t. Inum (i#bs) t"
consider "j = 0" | "j \<noteq> 0" "?c = 0" | "j \<noteq> 0" "?c > 0" | "j \<noteq> 0" "?c < 0"
by arith
then show ?case
proof cases
case 1
then have z: "zlfm (Dvd j a) = (zlfm (Eq a))"
by (simp add: Let_def)
with 11 \<open>j = 0\<close> show ?thesis
by (simp del: zlfm.simps)
next
case 2
with zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"] show ?thesis
apply (auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps)
apply (cases "?r")
apply auto
subgoal for nat a b by (cases nat) auto
done
next
case 3
then have l: "?L (?l (Dvd j a))"
by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def)
with Ia 3 show ?thesis
by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
next
case 4
then have l: "?L (?l (Dvd j a))"
by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def)
with Ia 4 dvd_minus_iff[of "\<bar>j\<bar>" "?c*i + ?N ?r"] show ?thesis
by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
qed
next
case (12 j a)
let ?c = "fst (zsplit0 a)"
let ?r = "snd (zsplit0 a)"
have spl: "zsplit0 a = (?c, ?r)"
by simp
from zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"]
have Ia: "Inum (i # bs) a = Inum (i #bs) (CN 0 ?c ?r)" and nb: "numbound0 ?r"
by auto
let ?N = "\<lambda>t. Inum (i # bs) t"
consider "j = 0" | "j \<noteq> 0" "?c = 0" | "j \<noteq> 0" "?c > 0" | "j \<noteq> 0" "?c < 0"
by arith
then show ?case
proof cases
case 1
then have z: "zlfm (NDvd j a) = zlfm (NEq a)"
by (simp add: Let_def)
with assms 12 \<open>j = 0\<close> show ?thesis
by (simp del: zlfm.simps)
next
case 2
with zsplit0_I[OF spl, where x="i" and bs="bs"] show ?thesis
apply (auto simp add: Let_def split_def algebra_simps)
apply (cases "?r")
apply auto
subgoal for nat a b by (cases nat) auto
done
next
case 3
then have l: "?L (?l (Dvd j a))"
by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def)
with Ia 3 show ?thesis
by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
next
case 4
then have l: "?L (?l (Dvd j a))"
by (simp add: nb Let_def split_def)
with Ia 4 dvd_minus_iff[of "\<bar>j\<bar>" "?c*i + ?N ?r"] show ?thesis
by (simp add: Let_def split_def)
qed
qed auto
fun minusinf :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm" \<comment> \<open>virtual substitution of \<open>-\<infinity>\<close>\<close>
where
"minusinf (And p q) = And (minusinf p) (minusinf q)"
| "minusinf (Or p q) = Or (minusinf p) (minusinf q)"
| "minusinf (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = F"
| "minusinf (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = T"
| "minusinf (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = T"
| "minusinf (Le (CN 0 c e)) = T"
| "minusinf (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = F"
| "minusinf (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = F"
| "minusinf p = p"
lemma minusinf_qfree: "qfree p \<Longrightarrow> qfree (minusinf p)"
by (induct p rule: minusinf.induct) auto
fun plusinf :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm" \<comment> \<open>virtual substitution of \<open>+\<infinity>\<close>\<close>
where
"plusinf (And p q) = And (plusinf p) (plusinf q)"
| "plusinf (Or p q) = Or (plusinf p) (plusinf q)"
| "plusinf (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = F"
| "plusinf (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = T"
| "plusinf (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = F"
| "plusinf (Le (CN 0 c e)) = F"
| "plusinf (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = T"
| "plusinf (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = T"
| "plusinf p = p"
fun \<delta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int" \<comment> \<open>compute \<open>lcm {d| N\<^sup>? Dvd c*x+t \<in> p}\<close>\<close>
where
"\<delta> (And p q) = lcm (\<delta> p) (\<delta> q)"
| "\<delta> (Or p q) = lcm (\<delta> p) (\<delta> q)"
| "\<delta> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) = i"
| "\<delta> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e)) = i"
| "\<delta> p = 1"
fun d_\<delta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool" \<comment> \<open>check if a given \<open>l\<close> divides all the \<open>ds\<close> above\<close>
where
"d_\<delta> (And p q) d \<longleftrightarrow> d_\<delta> p d \<and> d_\<delta> q d"
| "d_\<delta> (Or p q) d \<longleftrightarrow> d_\<delta> p d \<and> d_\<delta> q d"
| "d_\<delta> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) d \<longleftrightarrow> i dvd d"
| "d_\<delta> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e)) d \<longleftrightarrow> i dvd d"
| "d_\<delta> p d \<longleftrightarrow> True"
lemma delta_mono:
assumes lin: "iszlfm p"
and d: "d dvd d'"
and ad: "d_\<delta> p d"
shows "d_\<delta> p d'"
using lin ad
proof (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
case (9 i c e)
then show ?case using d
by (simp add: dvd_trans[of "i" "d" "d'"])
next
case (10 i c e)
then show ?case using d
by (simp add: dvd_trans[of "i" "d" "d'"])
qed simp_all
lemma \<delta>:
assumes lin: "iszlfm p"
shows "d_\<delta> p (\<delta> p) \<and> \<delta> p >0"
using lin
by (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct) (auto intro: delta_mono simp add: lcm_pos_int)
fun a_\<beta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> fm" \<comment> \<open>adjust the coefficients of a formula\<close>
where
"a_\<beta> (And p q) k = And (a_\<beta> p k) (a_\<beta> q k)"
| "a_\<beta> (Or p q) k = Or (a_\<beta> p k) (a_\<beta> q k)"
| "a_\<beta> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) k = Eq (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e))"
| "a_\<beta> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) k = NEq (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e))"
| "a_\<beta> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) k = Lt (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e))"
| "a_\<beta> (Le (CN 0 c e)) k = Le (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e))"
| "a_\<beta> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) k = Gt (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e))"
| "a_\<beta> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) k = Ge (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e))"
| "a_\<beta> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) k = Dvd ((k div c)*i) (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e))"
| "a_\<beta> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e)) k = NDvd ((k div c)*i) (CN 0 1 (Mul (k div c) e))"
| "a_\<beta> p k = p"
fun d_\<beta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int \<Rightarrow> bool" \<comment> \<open>test if all coeffs of \<open>c\<close> divide a given \<open>l\<close>\<close>
where
"d_\<beta> (And p q) k \<longleftrightarrow> d_\<beta> p k \<and> d_\<beta> q k"
| "d_\<beta> (Or p q) k \<longleftrightarrow> d_\<beta> p k \<and> d_\<beta> q k"
| "d_\<beta> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) k \<longleftrightarrow> c dvd k"
| "d_\<beta> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) k \<longleftrightarrow> c dvd k"
| "d_\<beta> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) k \<longleftrightarrow> c dvd k"
| "d_\<beta> (Le (CN 0 c e)) k \<longleftrightarrow> c dvd k"
| "d_\<beta> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) k \<longleftrightarrow> c dvd k"
| "d_\<beta> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) k \<longleftrightarrow> c dvd k"
| "d_\<beta> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) k \<longleftrightarrow> c dvd k"
| "d_\<beta> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e)) k \<longleftrightarrow> c dvd k"
| "d_\<beta> p k \<longleftrightarrow> True"
fun \<zeta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> int" \<comment> \<open>computes the lcm of all coefficients of \<open>x\<close>\<close>
where
"\<zeta> (And p q) = lcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"
| "\<zeta> (Or p q) = lcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"
| "\<zeta> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = c"
| "\<zeta> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = c"
| "\<zeta> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = c"
| "\<zeta> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = c"
| "\<zeta> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = c"
| "\<zeta> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = c"
| "\<zeta> (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) = c"
| "\<zeta> (NDvd i (CN 0 c e))= c"
| "\<zeta> p = 1"
fun \<beta> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> num list"
where
"\<beta> (And p q) = (\<beta> p @ \<beta> q)"
| "\<beta> (Or p q) = (\<beta> p @ \<beta> q)"
| "\<beta> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = [Sub (C (- 1)) e]"
| "\<beta> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = [Neg e]"
| "\<beta> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = []"
| "\<beta> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = []"
| "\<beta> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = [Neg e]"
| "\<beta> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = [Sub (C (- 1)) e]"
| "\<beta> p = []"
fun \<alpha> :: "fm \<Rightarrow> num list"
where
"\<alpha> (And p q) = \<alpha> p @ \<alpha> q"
| "\<alpha> (Or p q) = \<alpha> p @ \<alpha> q"
| "\<alpha> (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = [Add (C (- 1)) e]"
| "\<alpha> (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = [e]"
| "\<alpha> (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = [e]"
| "\<alpha> (Le (CN 0 c e)) = [Add (C (- 1)) e]"
| "\<alpha> (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = []"
| "\<alpha> (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = []"
| "\<alpha> p = []"
fun mirror :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
where
"mirror (And p q) = And (mirror p) (mirror q)"
| "mirror (Or p q) = Or (mirror p) (mirror q)"
| "mirror (Eq (CN 0 c e)) = Eq (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
| "mirror (NEq (CN 0 c e)) = NEq (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
| "mirror (Lt (CN 0 c e)) = Gt (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
| "mirror (Le (CN 0 c e)) = Ge (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
| "mirror (Gt (CN 0 c e)) = Lt (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
| "mirror (Ge (CN 0 c e)) = Le (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
| "mirror (Dvd i (CN 0 c e)) = Dvd i (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
| "mirror (NDvd i (CN 0 c e)) = NDvd i (CN 0 c (Neg e))"
| "mirror p = p"
text \<open>Lemmas for the correctness of \<open>\<sigma>_\<rho>\<close>\<close>
lemma dvd1_eq1: "x > 0 \<Longrightarrow> x dvd 1 \<longleftrightarrow> x = 1"
for x :: int
by simp
lemma minusinf_inf:
assumes linp: "iszlfm p"
and u: "d_\<beta> p 1"
shows "\<exists>z::int. \<forall>x < z. Ifm bbs (x # bs) (minusinf p) = Ifm bbs (x # bs) p"
(is "?P p" is "\<exists>(z::int). \<forall>x < z. ?I x (?M p) = ?I x p")
using linp u
proof (induct p rule: minusinf.induct)
case (1 p q)
then show ?case
apply auto
subgoal for z z' by (rule exI [where x = "min z z'"]) simp
done
next
case (2 p q)
then show ?case
apply auto
subgoal for z z' by (rule exI [where x = "min z z'"]) simp
done
next
case (3 c e)
then have c1: "c = 1" and nb: "numbound0 e"
by simp_all
fix a
from 3 have "\<forall>x<(- Inum (a # bs) e). c * x + Inum (x # bs) e \<noteq> 0"
proof clarsimp
fix x
assume "x < (- Inum (a # bs) e)" and "x + Inum (x # bs) e = 0"
with numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"]
show False by simp
qed
then show ?case by auto
next
case (4 c e)
then have c1: "c = 1" and nb: "numbound0 e"
by simp_all
fix a
from 4 have "\<forall>x < (- Inum (a # bs) e). c * x + Inum (x # bs) e \<noteq> 0"
proof clarsimp
fix x
assume "x < (- Inum (a # bs) e)" and "x + Inum (x # bs) e = 0"
with numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"]
show "False" by simp
qed
then show ?case by auto
next
case (5 c e)
then have c1: "c = 1" and nb: "numbound0 e"
by simp_all
fix a
from 5 have "\<forall>x<(- Inum (a # bs) e). c * x + Inum (x # bs) e < 0"
proof clarsimp
fix x
assume "x < (- Inum (a # bs) e)"
with numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"]
show "x + Inum (x # bs) e < 0"
by simp
qed
then show ?case by auto
next
case (6 c e)
then have c1: "c = 1" and nb: "numbound0 e"
by simp_all
fix a
from 6 have "\<forall>x<(- Inum (a # bs) e). c * x + Inum (x # bs) e \<le> 0"
proof clarsimp
fix x
assume "x < (- Inum (a # bs) e)"
with numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"]
show "x + Inum (x # bs) e \<le> 0" by simp
qed
then show ?case by auto
next
case (7 c e)
then have c1: "c = 1" and nb: "numbound0 e"
by simp_all
fix a
from 7 have "\<forall>x<(- Inum (a # bs) e). \<not> (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e > 0)"
proof clarsimp
fix x
assume "x < - Inum (a # bs) e" and "x + Inum (x # bs) e > 0"
with numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"]
show False by simp
qed
then show ?case by auto
next
case (8 c e)
then have c1: "c = 1" and nb: "numbound0 e"
by simp_all
fix a
from 8 have "\<forall>x<(- Inum (a # bs) e). \<not> c * x + Inum (x # bs) e \<ge> 0"
proof clarsimp
fix x
assume "x < (- Inum (a # bs) e)" and "x + Inum (x # bs) e \<ge> 0"
with numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="a" and b'="x"]
show False by simp
qed
then show ?case by auto
qed auto
lemma minusinf_repeats:
assumes d: "d_\<delta> p d"
and linp: "iszlfm p"
shows "Ifm bbs ((x - k * d) # bs) (minusinf p) = Ifm bbs (x # bs) (minusinf p)"
using linp d
proof (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
case (9 i c e)
then have nbe: "numbound0 e" and id: "i dvd d"
by simp_all
then have "\<exists>k. d = i * k"
by (simp add: dvd_def)
then obtain "di" where di_def: "d = i * di"
by blast
show ?case
proof (simp add: numbound0_I[OF nbe,where bs="bs" and b="x - k * d" and b'="x"] right_diff_distrib,
rule iffI)
assume "i dvd c * x - c * (k * d) + Inum (x # bs) e"
(is "?ri dvd ?rc * ?rx - ?rc * (?rk * ?rd) + ?I x e" is "?ri dvd ?rt")
then have "\<exists>l::int. ?rt = i * l"
by (simp add: dvd_def)
then have "\<exists>l::int. c * x + ?I x e = i * l + c * (k * i * di)"
by (simp add: algebra_simps di_def)
then have "\<exists>l::int. c * x + ?I x e = i* (l + c * k * di)"
by (simp add: algebra_simps)
then have "\<exists>l::int. c * x + ?I x e = i * l"
by blast
then show "i dvd c * x + Inum (x # bs) e"
by (simp add: dvd_def)
next
assume "i dvd c * x + Inum (x # bs) e" (is "?ri dvd ?rc * ?rx + ?e")
then have "\<exists>l::int. c * x + ?e = i * l"
by (simp add: dvd_def)
then have "\<exists>l::int. c * x - c * (k * d) + ?e = i * l - c * (k * d)"
by simp
then have "\<exists>l::int. c * x - c * (k * d) + ?e = i * l - c * (k * i * di)"
by (simp add: di_def)
then have "\<exists>l::int. c * x - c * (k * d) + ?e = i * (l - c * k * di)"
by (simp add: algebra_simps)
then have "\<exists>l::int. c * x - c * (k * d) + ?e = i * l"
by blast
then show "i dvd c * x - c * (k * d) + Inum (x # bs) e"
by (simp add: dvd_def)
qed
next
case (10 i c e)
then have nbe: "numbound0 e" and id: "i dvd d"
by simp_all
then have "\<exists>k. d = i * k"
by (simp add: dvd_def)
then obtain di where di_def: "d = i * di"
by blast
show ?case
proof (simp add: numbound0_I[OF nbe,where bs="bs" and b="x - k * d" and b'="x"] right_diff_distrib,
rule iffI)
assume "i dvd c * x - c * (k * d) + Inum (x # bs) e"
(is "?ri dvd ?rc * ?rx - ?rc * (?rk * ?rd) + ?I x e" is "?ri dvd ?rt")
then have "\<exists>l::int. ?rt = i * l"
by (simp add: dvd_def)
then have "\<exists>l::int. c * x + ?I x e = i * l + c * (k * i * di)"
by (simp add: algebra_simps di_def)
then have "\<exists>l::int. c * x+ ?I x e = i * (l + c * k * di)"
by (simp add: algebra_simps)
then have "\<exists>l::int. c * x + ?I x e = i * l"
by blast
then show "i dvd c * x + Inum (x # bs) e"
by (simp add: dvd_def)
next
assume "i dvd c * x + Inum (x # bs) e" (is "?ri dvd ?rc * ?rx + ?e")
then have "\<exists>l::int. c * x + ?e = i * l"
by (simp add: dvd_def)
then have "\<exists>l::int. c * x - c * (k * d) + ?e = i * l - c * (k * d)"
by simp
then have "\<exists>l::int. c * x - c * (k * d) + ?e = i * l - c * (k * i * di)"
by (simp add: di_def)
then have "\<exists>l::int. c * x - c * (k * d) + ?e = i * (l - c * k * di)"
by (simp add: algebra_simps)
then have "\<exists>l::int. c * x - c * (k * d) + ?e = i * l"
by blast
then show "i dvd c * x - c * (k * d) + Inum (x # bs) e"
by (simp add: dvd_def)
qed
qed (auto simp add: gr0_conv_Suc numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="x - k*d" and b'="x"])
lemma mirror_\<alpha>_\<beta>:
assumes lp: "iszlfm p"
shows "Inum (i # bs) ` set (\<alpha> p) = Inum (i # bs) ` set (\<beta> (mirror p))"
using lp by (induct p rule: mirror.induct) auto
lemma mirror:
assumes lp: "iszlfm p"
shows "Ifm bbs (x # bs) (mirror p) = Ifm bbs ((- x) # bs) p"
using lp
proof (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
case (9 j c e)
then have nb: "numbound0 e"
by simp
have "Ifm bbs (x # bs) (mirror (Dvd j (CN 0 c e))) \<longleftrightarrow> j dvd c * x - Inum (x # bs) e"
(is "_ = (j dvd c*x - ?e)") by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> j dvd (- (c * x - ?e))"
by (simp only: dvd_minus_iff)
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> j dvd (c * (- x)) + ?e"
by (simp only: minus_mult_right[symmetric] minus_mult_left[symmetric] ac_simps minus_add_distrib)
(simp add: algebra_simps)
also have "\<dots> = Ifm bbs ((- x) # bs) (Dvd j (CN 0 c e))"
using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="- x"] by simp
finally show ?case .
next
case (10 j c e)
then have nb: "numbound0 e"
by simp
have "Ifm bbs (x # bs) (mirror (Dvd j (CN 0 c e))) \<longleftrightarrow> j dvd c * x - Inum (x # bs) e"
(is "_ = (j dvd c * x - ?e)") by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> j dvd (- (c * x - ?e))"
by (simp only: dvd_minus_iff)
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> j dvd (c * (- x)) + ?e"
by (simp only: minus_mult_right[symmetric] minus_mult_left[symmetric] ac_simps minus_add_distrib)
(simp add: algebra_simps)
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> Ifm bbs ((- x) # bs) (Dvd j (CN 0 c e))"
using numbound0_I[OF nb, where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="- x"] by simp
finally show ?case by simp
qed (auto simp add: numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="x" and b'="- x"] gr0_conv_Suc)
lemma mirror_l: "iszlfm p \<and> d_\<beta> p 1 \<Longrightarrow> iszlfm (mirror p) \<and> d_\<beta> (mirror p) 1"
by (induct p rule: mirror.induct) auto
lemma mirror_\<delta>: "iszlfm p \<Longrightarrow> \<delta> (mirror p) = \<delta> p"
by (induct p rule: mirror.induct) auto
lemma \<beta>_numbound0:
assumes lp: "iszlfm p"
shows "\<forall>b \<in> set (\<beta> p). numbound0 b"
using lp by (induct p rule: \<beta>.induct) auto
lemma d_\<beta>_mono:
assumes linp: "iszlfm p"
and dr: "d_\<beta> p l"
and d: "l dvd l'"
shows "d_\<beta> p l'"
using dr linp dvd_trans[of _ "l" "l'", simplified d]
by (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct) simp_all
lemma \<alpha>_l:
assumes "iszlfm p"
shows "\<forall>b \<in> set (\<alpha> p). numbound0 b"
using assms by (induct p rule: \<alpha>.induct) auto
lemma \<zeta>:
assumes "iszlfm p"
shows "\<zeta> p > 0 \<and> d_\<beta> p (\<zeta> p)"
using assms
proof (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
case (1 p q)
from 1 have dl1: "\<zeta> p dvd lcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"
by simp
from 1 have dl2: "\<zeta> q dvd lcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"
by simp
from 1 d_\<beta>_mono[where p = "p" and l="\<zeta> p" and l'="lcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"]
d_\<beta>_mono[where p = "q" and l="\<zeta> q" and l'="lcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"]
dl1 dl2
show ?case
by (auto simp add: lcm_pos_int)
next
case (2 p q)
from 2 have dl1: "\<zeta> p dvd lcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"
by simp
from 2 have dl2: "\<zeta> q dvd lcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"
by simp
from 2 d_\<beta>_mono[where p = "p" and l="\<zeta> p" and l'="lcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"]
d_\<beta>_mono[where p = "q" and l="\<zeta> q" and l'="lcm (\<zeta> p) (\<zeta> q)"]
dl1 dl2
show ?case
by (auto simp add: lcm_pos_int)
qed (auto simp add: lcm_pos_int)
lemma a_\<beta>:
assumes linp: "iszlfm p"
and d: "d_\<beta> p l"
and lp: "l > 0"
shows "iszlfm (a_\<beta> p l) \<and> d_\<beta> (a_\<beta> p l) 1 \<and> Ifm bbs (l * x # bs) (a_\<beta> p l) = Ifm bbs (x # bs) p"
using linp d
proof (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
case (5 c e)
then have cp: "c > 0" and be: "numbound0 e" and d': "c dvd l"
by simp_all
from lp cp have clel: "c \<le> l"
by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0"
by simp
have "c div c \<le> l div c"
by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
then have ldcp: "0 < l div c"
by (simp add: div_self[OF cnz])
have "c * (l div c) = c * (l div c) + l mod c"
using d' dvd_eq_mod_eq_0[of "c" "l"] by simp
then have cl: "c * (l div c) =l"
using mult_div_mod_eq [where a="l" and b="c"] by simp
then have "(l * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e < 0) \<longleftrightarrow>
((c * (l div c)) * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e < 0)"
by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (l div c) * (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e) < (l div c) * 0"
by (simp add: algebra_simps)
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> c * x + Inum (x # bs) e < 0"
using mult_less_0_iff [where a="(l div c)" and b="c*x + Inum (x # bs) e"] ldcp
by simp
finally show ?case
using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="l*x" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] be
by simp
next
case (6 c e)
then have cp: "c > 0" and be: "numbound0 e" and d': "c dvd l"
by simp_all
from lp cp have clel: "c \<le> l"
by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0"
by simp
have "c div c \<le> l div c"
by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
by (simp add: div_self[OF cnz])
have "c * (l div c) = c * (l div c) + l mod c"
using d' dvd_eq_mod_eq_0[of "c" "l"] by simp
then have cl: "c * (l div c) = l"
using mult_div_mod_eq [where a="l" and b="c"] by simp
then have "l * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e \<le> 0 \<longleftrightarrow>
(c * (l div c)) * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e \<le> 0"
by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (l div c) * (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e) \<le> (l div c) * 0"
by (simp add: algebra_simps)
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> c * x + Inum (x # bs) e \<le> 0"
using mult_le_0_iff [where a="(l div c)" and b="c*x + Inum (x # bs) e"] ldcp by simp
finally show ?case
using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="l*x" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] be by simp
next
case (7 c e)
then have cp: "c > 0" and be: "numbound0 e" and d': "c dvd l"
by simp_all
from lp cp have clel: "c \<le> l"
by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0"
by simp
have "c div c \<le> l div c"
by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
then have ldcp: "0 < l div c"
by (simp add: div_self[OF cnz])
have "c * (l div c) = c * (l div c) + l mod c"
using d' dvd_eq_mod_eq_0[of "c" "l"] by simp
then have cl: "c * (l div c) = l"
using mult_div_mod_eq [where a="l" and b="c"] by simp
then have "l * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e > 0 \<longleftrightarrow>
(c * (l div c)) * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e > 0"
by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (l div c) * (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e) > (l div c) * 0"
by (simp add: algebra_simps)
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> c * x + Inum (x # bs) e > 0"
using zero_less_mult_iff [where a="(l div c)" and b="c * x + Inum (x # bs) e"] ldcp
by simp
finally show ?case
using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="(l * x)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] be
by simp
next
case (8 c e)
then have cp: "c > 0" and be: "numbound0 e" and d': "c dvd l"
by simp_all
from lp cp have clel: "c \<le> l"
by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0"
by simp
have "c div c \<le> l div c"
by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
then have ldcp: "0 < l div c"
by (simp add: div_self[OF cnz])
have "c * (l div c) = c * (l div c) + l mod c"
using d' dvd_eq_mod_eq_0[of "c" "l"] by simp
then have cl: "c * (l div c) =l"
using mult_div_mod_eq [where a="l" and b="c"]
by simp
then have "l * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e \<ge> 0 \<longleftrightarrow>
(c * (l div c)) * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e \<ge> 0"
by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (l div c) * (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e) \<ge> (l div c) * 0"
by (simp add: algebra_simps)
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> c * x + Inum (x # bs) e \<ge> 0"
using ldcp zero_le_mult_iff [where a="l div c" and b="c*x + Inum (x # bs) e"]
by simp
finally show ?case
using be numbound0_I[OF be,where b="l*x" and b'="x" and bs="bs"]
by simp
next
case (3 c e)
then have cp: "c > 0" and be: "numbound0 e" and d': "c dvd l"
by simp_all
from lp cp have clel: "c \<le> l"
by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0"
by simp
have "c div c \<le> l div c"
by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
by (simp add: div_self[OF cnz])
have "c * (l div c) = c * (l div c) + l mod c"
using d' dvd_eq_mod_eq_0[of "c" "l"] by simp
then have cl:"c * (l div c) =l" using mult_div_mod_eq [where a="l" and b="c"]
by simp
then have "l * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e = 0 \<longleftrightarrow>
(c * (l div c)) * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e = 0"
by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (l div c) * (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e) = ((l div c)) * 0"
by (simp add: algebra_simps)
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> c * x + Inum (x # bs) e = 0"
using mult_eq_0_iff [where a="(l div c)" and b="c * x + Inum (x # bs) e"] ldcp
by simp
finally show ?case
using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="(l * x)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] be
by simp
next
case (4 c e)
then have cp: "c > 0" and be: "numbound0 e" and d': "c dvd l"
by simp_all
from lp cp have clel: "c \<le> l"
by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0"
by simp
have "c div c \<le> l div c"
by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
by (simp add: div_self[OF cnz])
have "c * (l div c) = c * (l div c) + l mod c"
using d' dvd_eq_mod_eq_0[of "c" "l"] by simp
then have cl: "c * (l div c) = l"
using mult_div_mod_eq [where a="l" and b="c"] by simp
then have "l * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e \<noteq> 0 \<longleftrightarrow>
(c * (l div c)) * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e \<noteq> 0"
by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (l div c) * (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e) \<noteq> (l div c) * 0"
by (simp add: algebra_simps)
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> c * x + Inum (x # bs) e \<noteq> 0"
using zero_le_mult_iff [where a="(l div c)" and b="c * x + Inum (x # bs) e"] ldcp
by simp
finally show ?case
using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="(l * x)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] be
by simp
next
case (9 j c e)
then have cp: "c > 0" and be: "numbound0 e" and jp: "j > 0" and d': "c dvd l"
by simp_all
from lp cp have clel: "c \<le> l"
by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0" by simp
have "c div c\<le> l div c"
by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
then have ldcp:"0 < l div c"
by (simp add: div_self[OF cnz])
have "c * (l div c) = c * (l div c) + l mod c"
using d' dvd_eq_mod_eq_0[of "c" "l"] by simp
then have cl: "c * (l div c) = l"
using mult_div_mod_eq [where a="l" and b="c"] by simp
then have "(\<exists>k::int. l * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e = ((l div c) * j) * k) \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<exists>k::int. (c * (l div c)) * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e = ((l div c) * j) * k)"
by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>k::int. (l div c) * (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e - j * k) = (l div c) * 0)"
by (simp add: algebra_simps)
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>k::int. c * x + Inum (x # bs) e - j * k = 0)"
using zero_le_mult_iff [where a="(l div c)" and b="c * x + Inum (x # bs) e - j * k" for k] ldcp
by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>k::int. c * x + Inum (x # bs) e = j * k)"
by simp
finally show ?case
using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="(l * x)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"]
be mult_strict_mono[OF ldcp jp ldcp ]
by (simp add: dvd_def)
next
case (10 j c e)
then have cp: "c > 0" and be: "numbound0 e" and jp: "j > 0" and d': "c dvd l"
by simp_all
from lp cp have clel: "c \<le> l"
by (simp add: zdvd_imp_le [OF d' lp])
from cp have cnz: "c \<noteq> 0"
by simp
have "c div c \<le> l div c"
by (simp add: zdiv_mono1[OF clel cp])
then have ldcp: "0 < l div c"
by (simp add: div_self[OF cnz])
have "c * (l div c) = c* (l div c) + l mod c"
using d' dvd_eq_mod_eq_0[of "c" "l"] by simp
then have cl:"c * (l div c) =l"
using mult_div_mod_eq [where a="l" and b="c"]
by simp
then have "(\<exists>k::int. l * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e = ((l div c) * j) * k) \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<exists>k::int. (c * (l div c)) * x + (l div c) * Inum (x # bs) e = ((l div c) * j) * k)"
by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>k::int. (l div c) * (c * x + Inum (x # bs) e - j * k) = (l div c) * 0)"
by (simp add: algebra_simps)
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>k::int. c * x + Inum (x # bs) e - j * k = 0)"
using zero_le_mult_iff [where a="(l div c)" and b="c * x + Inum (x # bs) e - j * k" for k] ldcp
by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>k::int. c * x + Inum (x # bs) e = j * k)"
by simp
finally show ?case
using numbound0_I[OF be,where b="(l * x)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] be
mult_strict_mono[OF ldcp jp ldcp ]
by (simp add: dvd_def)
qed (auto simp add: gr0_conv_Suc numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="(l * x)" and b'="x"])
lemma a_\<beta>_ex:
assumes linp: "iszlfm p"
and d: "d_\<beta> p l"
and lp: "l > 0"
shows "(\<exists>x. l dvd x \<and> Ifm bbs (x #bs) (a_\<beta> p l)) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x::int. Ifm bbs (x#bs) p)"
(is "(\<exists>x. l dvd x \<and> ?P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x. ?P' x)")
proof-
have "(\<exists>x. l dvd x \<and> ?P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x::int. ?P (l * x))"
using unity_coeff_ex[where l="l" and P="?P", simplified] by simp
also have "\<dots> = (\<exists>x::int. ?P' x)"
using a_\<beta>[OF linp d lp] by simp
finally show ?thesis .
qed
lemma \<beta>:
assumes "iszlfm p"
and "d_\<beta> p 1"
and "d_\<delta> p d"
and dp: "d > 0"
and "\<not> (\<exists>j::int \<in> {1 .. d}. \<exists>b \<in> Inum (a # bs) ` set (\<beta> p). x = b + j)"
and p: "Ifm bbs (x # bs) p" (is "?P x")
shows "?P (x - d)"
using assms
proof (induct p rule: iszlfm.induct)
case (5 c e)
then have c1: "c = 1" and bn: "numbound0 e"
by simp_all
with dp p c1 numbound0_I[OF bn,where b = "(x - d)" and b' = "x" and bs = "bs"] 5
show ?case by simp
next
case (6 c e)
then have c1: "c = 1" and bn: "numbound0 e"
by simp_all
with dp p c1 numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="(x-d)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] 6
show ?case by simp
next
case (7 c e)
then have p: "Ifm bbs (x # bs) (Gt (CN 0 c e))" and c1: "c=1" and bn: "numbound0 e"
by simp_all
let ?e = "Inum (x # bs) e"
show ?case
proof (cases "(x - d) + ?e > 0")
case True
then show ?thesis
using c1 numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="(x-d)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] by simp
next
case False
let ?v = "Neg e"
have vb: "?v \<in> set (\<beta> (Gt (CN 0 c e)))"
by simp
from 7(5)[simplified simp_thms Inum.simps \<beta>.simps list.set bex_simps numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="a" and b'="x" and bs="bs"]]
have nob: "\<not> (\<exists>j\<in> {1 ..d}. x = - ?e + j)"
by auto
from False p have "x + ?e > 0 \<and> x + ?e \<le> d"
by (simp add: c1)
then have "x + ?e \<ge> 1 \<and> x + ?e \<le> d"
by simp
then have "\<exists>j::int \<in> {1 .. d}. j = x + ?e"
by simp
then have "\<exists>j::int \<in> {1 .. d}. x = (- ?e + j)"
by (simp add: algebra_simps)
with nob show ?thesis
by auto
qed
next
case (8 c e)
then have p: "Ifm bbs (x # bs) (Ge (CN 0 c e))" and c1: "c = 1" and bn: "numbound0 e"
by simp_all
let ?e = "Inum (x # bs) e"
show ?case
proof (cases "(x - d) + ?e \<ge> 0")
case True
then show ?thesis
using c1 numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="(x-d)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"]
by simp
next
case False
let ?v = "Sub (C (- 1)) e"
have vb: "?v \<in> set (\<beta> (Ge (CN 0 c e)))"
by simp
from 8(5)[simplified simp_thms Inum.simps \<beta>.simps list.set bex_simps numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="a" and b'="x" and bs="bs"]]
have nob: "\<not> (\<exists>j\<in> {1 ..d}. x = - ?e - 1 + j)"
by auto
from False p have "x + ?e \<ge> 0 \<and> x + ?e < d"
by (simp add: c1)
then have "x + ?e +1 \<ge> 1 \<and> x + ?e + 1 \<le> d"
by simp
then have "\<exists>j::int \<in> {1 .. d}. j = x + ?e + 1"
by simp
then have "\<exists>j::int \<in> {1 .. d}. x= - ?e - 1 + j"
by (simp add: algebra_simps)
with nob show ?thesis
by simp
qed
next
case (3 c e)
then
have p: "Ifm bbs (x #bs) (Eq (CN 0 c e))" (is "?p x")
and c1: "c = 1"
and bn: "numbound0 e"
by simp_all
let ?e = "Inum (x # bs) e"
let ?v="(Sub (C (- 1)) e)"
have vb: "?v \<in> set (\<beta> (Eq (CN 0 c e)))"
by simp
from p have "x= - ?e"
by (simp add: c1) with 3(5)
show ?case
using dp apply simp
apply (erule ballE[where x="1"])
apply (simp_all add:algebra_simps numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="x"and b'="a"and bs="bs"])
done
next
case (4 c e)
then
have p: "Ifm bbs (x # bs) (NEq (CN 0 c e))" (is "?p x")
and c1: "c = 1"
and bn: "numbound0 e"
by simp_all
let ?e = "Inum (x # bs) e"
let ?v="Neg e"
have vb: "?v \<in> set (\<beta> (NEq (CN 0 c e)))"
by simp
show ?case
proof (cases "x - d + Inum ((x - d) # bs) e = 0")
case False
then show ?thesis by (simp add: c1)
next
case True
then have "x = - Inum ((x - d) # bs) e + d"
by simp
then have "x = - Inum (a # bs) e + d"
by (simp add: numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="x - d"and b'="a"and bs="bs"])
with 4(5) show ?thesis
using dp by simp
qed
next
case (9 j c e)
then
have p: "Ifm bbs (x # bs) (Dvd j (CN 0 c e))" (is "?p x")
and c1: "c = 1"
and bn: "numbound0 e"
by simp_all
let ?e = "Inum (x # bs) e"
from 9 have id: "j dvd d"
by simp
from c1 have "?p x \<longleftrightarrow> j dvd (x + ?e)"
by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> j dvd x - d + ?e"
using zdvd_period[OF id, where x="x" and c="-1" and t="?e"]
by simp
finally show ?case
using numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="(x-d)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] c1 p
by simp
next
case (10 j c e)
then
have p: "Ifm bbs (x # bs) (NDvd j (CN 0 c e))" (is "?p x")
and c1: "c = 1"
and bn: "numbound0 e"
by simp_all
let ?e = "Inum (x # bs) e"
from 10 have id: "j dvd d"
by simp
from c1 have "?p x \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> j dvd (x + ?e)"
by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> j dvd x - d + ?e"
using zdvd_period[OF id, where x="x" and c="-1" and t="?e"]
by simp
finally show ?case
using numbound0_I[OF bn,where b="(x-d)" and b'="x" and bs="bs"] c1 p
by simp
qed (auto simp add: numbound0_I[where bs="bs" and b="(x - d)" and b'="x"] gr0_conv_Suc)
lemma \<beta>':
assumes lp: "iszlfm p"
and u: "d_\<beta> p 1"
and d: "d_\<delta> p d"
and dp: "d > 0"
shows "\<forall>x. \<not> (\<exists>j::int \<in> {1 .. d}. \<exists>b \<in> set(\<beta> p). Ifm bbs ((Inum (a#bs) b + j) #bs) p) \<longrightarrow>
Ifm bbs (x # bs) p \<longrightarrow> Ifm bbs ((x - d) # bs) p" (is "\<forall>x. ?b \<longrightarrow> ?P x \<longrightarrow> ?P (x - d)")
proof clarify
fix x
assume nb: "?b" and px: "?P x"
then have nb2: "\<not> (\<exists>j::int \<in> {1 .. d}. \<exists>b \<in> Inum (a # bs) ` set (\<beta> p). x = b + j)"
by auto
show "?P (x - d)" by (rule \<beta>[OF lp u d dp nb2 px])
qed
lemma cpmi_eq:
fixes P P1 :: "int \<Rightarrow> bool"
assumes "0 < D"
and "\<exists>z. \<forall>x. x < z \<longrightarrow> P x = P1 x"
and "\<forall>x. \<not> (\<exists>j \<in> {1..D}. \<exists>b \<in> B. P (b + j)) \<longrightarrow> P x \<longrightarrow> P (x - D)"
and "\<forall>x k. P1 x = P1 (x - k * D)"
shows "(\<exists>x. P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>j \<in> {1..D}. P1 j) \<or> (\<exists>j \<in> {1..D}. \<exists>b \<in> B. P (b + j))"
apply (insert assms)
apply (rule iffI)
prefer 2
apply (drule minusinfinity)
apply assumption+
apply fastforce
apply clarsimp
apply (subgoal_tac "\<And>k. 0 \<le> k \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x. P x \<longrightarrow> P (x - k * D)")
apply (frule_tac x = x and z=z in decr_lemma)
apply (subgoal_tac "P1 (x - (\<bar>x - z\<bar> + 1) * D)")
prefer 2
apply (subgoal_tac "0 \<le> \<bar>x - z\<bar> + 1")
prefer 2 apply arith
apply fastforce
apply (drule (1) periodic_finite_ex)
apply blast
apply (blast dest: decr_mult_lemma)
done
theorem cp_thm:
assumes lp: "iszlfm p"
and u: "d_\<beta> p 1"
and d: "d_\<delta> p d"
and dp: "d > 0"
shows "(\<exists>x. Ifm bbs (x # bs) p) \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<exists>j \<in> {1.. d}. Ifm bbs (j # bs) (minusinf p) \<or>
(\<exists>b \<in> set (\<beta> p). Ifm bbs ((Inum (i # bs) b + j) # bs) p))"
(is "(\<exists>x. ?P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>j \<in> ?D. ?M j \<or> (\<exists>b \<in> ?B. ?P (?I b + j)))")
proof -
from minusinf_inf[OF lp u]
have th: "\<exists>z. \<forall>x<z. ?P x = ?M x"
by blast
let ?B' = "{?I b | b. b \<in> ?B}"
have BB': "(\<exists>j\<in>?D. \<exists>b \<in> ?B. ?P (?I b + j)) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>j \<in> ?D. \<exists>b \<in> ?B'. ?P (b + j))"
by auto
then have th2: "\<forall>x. \<not> (\<exists>j \<in> ?D. \<exists>b \<in> ?B'. ?P (b + j)) \<longrightarrow> ?P x \<longrightarrow> ?P (x - d)"
using \<beta>'[OF lp u d dp, where a="i" and bbs = "bbs"] by blast
from minusinf_repeats[OF d lp]
have th3: "\<forall>x k. ?M x = ?M (x-k*d)"
by simp
from cpmi_eq[OF dp th th2 th3] BB' show ?thesis
by blast
qed
text \<open>Implement the right hand sides of Cooper's theorem and Ferrante and Rackoff.\<close>
lemma mirror_ex:
assumes "iszlfm p"
shows "(\<exists>x. Ifm bbs (x#bs) (mirror p)) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x. Ifm bbs (x#bs) p)"
(is "(\<exists>x. ?I x ?mp) = (\<exists>x. ?I x p)")
proof auto
fix x
assume "?I x ?mp"
then have "?I (- x) p"
using mirror[OF assms] by blast
then show "\<exists>x. ?I x p"
by blast
next
fix x
assume "?I x p"
then have "?I (- x) ?mp"
using mirror[OF assms, where x="- x", symmetric] by auto
then show "\<exists>x. ?I x ?mp"
by blast
qed
lemma cp_thm':
assumes "iszlfm p"
and "d_\<beta> p 1"
and "d_\<delta> p d"
and "d > 0"
shows "(\<exists>x. Ifm bbs (x # bs) p) \<longleftrightarrow>
((\<exists>j\<in> {1 .. d}. Ifm bbs (j#bs) (minusinf p)) \<or>
(\<exists>j\<in> {1.. d}. \<exists>b\<in> (Inum (i#bs)) ` set (\<beta> p). Ifm bbs ((b + j) # bs) p))"
using cp_thm[OF assms,where i="i"] by auto
definition unit :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm \<times> num list \<times> int"
where
"unit p =
(let
p' = zlfm p;
l = \<zeta> p';
q = And (Dvd l (CN 0 1 (C 0))) (a_\<beta> p' l);
d = \<delta> q;
B = remdups (map simpnum (\<beta> q));
a = remdups (map simpnum (\<alpha> q))
in if length B \<le> length a then (q, B, d) else (mirror q, a, d))"
lemma unit:
assumes qf: "qfree p"
fixes q B d
assumes qBd: "unit p = (q, B, d)"
shows "((\<exists>x. Ifm bbs (x # bs) p) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>x. Ifm bbs (x # bs) q)) \<and>
(Inum (i # bs)) ` set B = (Inum (i # bs)) ` set (\<beta> q) \<and> d_\<beta> q 1 \<and> d_\<delta> q d \<and> d > 0 \<and>
iszlfm q \<and> (\<forall>b\<in> set B. numbound0 b)"
proof -
let ?I = "\<lambda>x p. Ifm bbs (x#bs) p"
let ?p' = "zlfm p"
let ?l = "\<zeta> ?p'"
let ?q = "And (Dvd ?l (CN 0 1 (C 0))) (a_\<beta> ?p' ?l)"
let ?d = "\<delta> ?q"
let ?B = "set (\<beta> ?q)"
let ?B'= "remdups (map simpnum (\<beta> ?q))"
let ?A = "set (\<alpha> ?q)"
let ?A'= "remdups (map simpnum (\<alpha> ?q))"
from conjunct1[OF zlfm_I[OF qf, where bs="bs"]]
have pp': "\<forall>i. ?I i ?p' = ?I i p" by auto
from conjunct2[OF zlfm_I[OF qf, where bs="bs" and i="i"]]
have lp': "iszlfm ?p'" .
from lp' \<zeta>[where p="?p'"] have lp: "?l >0" and dl: "d_\<beta> ?p' ?l" by auto
from a_\<beta>_ex[where p="?p'" and l="?l" and bs="bs", OF lp' dl lp] pp'
have pq_ex:"(\<exists>(x::int). ?I x p) = (\<exists>x. ?I x ?q)" by simp
from lp' lp a_\<beta>[OF lp' dl lp] have lq:"iszlfm ?q" and uq: "d_\<beta> ?q 1" by auto
from \<delta>[OF lq] have dp:"?d >0" and dd: "d_\<delta> ?q ?d" by blast+
let ?N = "\<lambda>t. Inum (i#bs) t"
have "?N ` set ?B' = ((?N \<circ> simpnum) ` ?B)"
by auto
also have "\<dots> = ?N ` ?B"
using simpnum_ci[where bs="i#bs"] by auto
finally have BB': "?N ` set ?B' = ?N ` ?B" .
have "?N ` set ?A' = ((?N \<circ> simpnum) ` ?A)"
by auto
also have "\<dots> = ?N ` ?A"
using simpnum_ci[where bs="i#bs"] by auto
finally have AA': "?N ` set ?A' = ?N ` ?A" .
from \<beta>_numbound0[OF lq] have B_nb:"\<forall>b\<in> set ?B'. numbound0 b"
by (simp add: simpnum_numbound0)
from \<alpha>_l[OF lq] have A_nb: "\<forall>b\<in> set ?A'. numbound0 b"
by (simp add: simpnum_numbound0)
show ?thesis
proof (cases "length ?B' \<le> length ?A'")
case True
then have q: "q = ?q" and "B = ?B'" and d: "d = ?d"
using qBd by (auto simp add: Let_def unit_def)
with BB' B_nb
have b: "?N ` (set B) = ?N ` set (\<beta> q)" and bn: "\<forall>b\<in> set B. numbound0 b"
by simp_all
with pq_ex dp uq dd lq q d show ?thesis
by simp
next
case False
then have q:"q=mirror ?q" and "B = ?A'" and d:"d = ?d"
using qBd by (auto simp add: Let_def unit_def)
with AA' mirror_\<alpha>_\<beta>[OF lq] A_nb have b:"?N ` (set B) = ?N ` set (\<beta> q)"
and bn: "\<forall>b\<in> set B. numbound0 b" by simp_all
from mirror_ex[OF lq] pq_ex q
have pqm_eq:"(\<exists>(x::int). ?I x p) = (\<exists>(x::int). ?I x q)"
by simp
from lq uq q mirror_l[where p="?q"]
have lq': "iszlfm q" and uq: "d_\<beta> q 1"
by auto
from \<delta>[OF lq'] mirror_\<delta>[OF lq] q d have dq: "d_\<delta> q d"
by auto
from pqm_eq b bn uq lq' dp dq q dp d show ?thesis
by simp
qed
qed
subsection \<open>Cooper's Algorithm\<close>
definition cooper :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
where
"cooper p =
(let
(q, B, d) = unit p;
js = [1..d];
mq = simpfm (minusinf q);
md = evaldjf (\<lambda>j. simpfm (subst0 (C j) mq)) js
in
if md = T then T
else
(let
qd = evaldjf (\<lambda>(b, j). simpfm (subst0 (Add b (C j)) q)) [(b, j). b \<leftarrow> B, j \<leftarrow> js]
in decr (disj md qd)))"
lemma cooper:
assumes qf: "qfree p"
shows "(\<exists>x. Ifm bbs (x#bs) p) = Ifm bbs bs (cooper p) \<and> qfree (cooper p)"
(is "?lhs = ?rhs \<and> _")
proof -
let ?I = "\<lambda>x p. Ifm bbs (x#bs) p"
let ?q = "fst (unit p)"
let ?B = "fst (snd(unit p))"
let ?d = "snd (snd (unit p))"
let ?js = "[1..?d]"
let ?mq = "minusinf ?q"
let ?smq = "simpfm ?mq"
let ?md = "evaldjf (\<lambda>j. simpfm (subst0 (C j) ?smq)) ?js"
fix i
let ?N = "\<lambda>t. Inum (i#bs) t"
let ?Bjs = "[(b,j). b\<leftarrow>?B,j\<leftarrow>?js]"
let ?qd = "evaldjf (\<lambda>(b,j). simpfm (subst0 (Add b (C j)) ?q)) ?Bjs"
have qbf:"unit p = (?q,?B,?d)" by simp
from unit[OF qf qbf]
have pq_ex: "(\<exists>(x::int). ?I x p) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>(x::int). ?I x ?q)"
and B: "?N ` set ?B = ?N ` set (\<beta> ?q)"
and uq: "d_\<beta> ?q 1"
and dd: "d_\<delta> ?q ?d"
and dp: "?d > 0"
and lq: "iszlfm ?q"
and Bn: "\<forall>b\<in> set ?B. numbound0 b"
by auto
from zlin_qfree[OF lq] have qfq: "qfree ?q" .
from simpfm_qf[OF minusinf_qfree[OF qfq]] have qfmq: "qfree ?smq" .
have jsnb: "\<forall>j \<in> set ?js. numbound0 (C j)"
by simp
then have "\<forall>j\<in> set ?js. bound0 (subst0 (C j) ?smq)"
by (auto simp only: subst0_bound0[OF qfmq])
then have th: "\<forall>j\<in> set ?js. bound0 (simpfm (subst0 (C j) ?smq))"
by (auto simp add: simpfm_bound0)
from evaldjf_bound0[OF th] have mdb: "bound0 ?md"
by simp
from Bn jsnb have "\<forall>(b,j) \<in> set ?Bjs. numbound0 (Add b (C j))"
by simp
then have "\<forall>(b,j) \<in> set ?Bjs. bound0 (subst0 (Add b (C j)) ?q)"
using subst0_bound0[OF qfq] by blast
then have "\<forall>(b,j) \<in> set ?Bjs. bound0 (simpfm (subst0 (Add b (C j)) ?q))"
using simpfm_bound0 by blast
then have th': "\<forall>x \<in> set ?Bjs. bound0 ((\<lambda>(b,j). simpfm (subst0 (Add b (C j)) ?q)) x)"
by auto
from evaldjf_bound0 [OF th'] have qdb: "bound0 ?qd"
by simp
from mdb qdb have mdqdb: "bound0 (disj ?md ?qd)"
unfolding disj_def by (cases "?md = T \<or> ?qd = T") simp_all
from trans [OF pq_ex cp_thm'[OF lq uq dd dp,where i="i"]] B
have "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>j \<in> {1.. ?d}. ?I j ?mq \<or> (\<exists>b \<in> ?N ` set ?B. Ifm bbs ((b + j) # bs) ?q))"
by auto
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>j \<in> {1.. ?d}. ?I j ?mq \<or> (\<exists>b \<in> set ?B. Ifm bbs ((?N b + j) # bs) ?q))"
by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>j \<in> {1.. ?d}. ?I j ?mq ) \<or>
(\<exists>j\<in> {1.. ?d}. \<exists>b \<in> set ?B. Ifm bbs ((?N (Add b (C j))) # bs) ?q)"
by (simp only: Inum.simps) blast
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>j \<in> {1.. ?d}. ?I j ?smq) \<or>
(\<exists>j \<in> {1.. ?d}. \<exists>b \<in> set ?B. Ifm bbs ((?N (Add b (C j))) # bs) ?q)"
by (simp add: simpfm)
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>j\<in> set ?js. (\<lambda>j. ?I i (simpfm (subst0 (C j) ?smq))) j) \<or>
(\<exists>j\<in> set ?js. \<exists>b\<in> set ?B. Ifm bbs ((?N (Add b (C j)))#bs) ?q)"
by (simp only: simpfm subst0_I[OF qfmq] set_upto) auto
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> ?I i (evaldjf (\<lambda>j. simpfm (subst0 (C j) ?smq)) ?js) \<or>
(\<exists>j\<in> set ?js. \<exists>b\<in> set ?B. ?I i (subst0 (Add b (C j)) ?q))"
by (simp only: evaldjf_ex subst0_I[OF qfq])
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> ?I i ?md \<or>
(\<exists>(b,j) \<in> set ?Bjs. (\<lambda>(b,j). ?I i (simpfm (subst0 (Add b (C j)) ?q))) (b,j))"
by (simp only: simpfm set_concat set_map concat_map_singleton UN_simps) blast
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> ?I i ?md \<or> ?I i (evaldjf (\<lambda>(b,j). simpfm (subst0 (Add b (C j)) ?q)) ?Bjs)"
by (simp only: evaldjf_ex[where bs="i#bs" and f="\<lambda>(b,j). simpfm (subst0 (Add b (C j)) ?q)" and ps="?Bjs"])
(auto simp add: split_def)
finally have mdqd: "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> ?I i ?md \<or> ?I i ?qd"
by simp
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> ?I i (disj ?md ?qd)"
by (simp add: disj)
also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> Ifm bbs bs (decr (disj ?md ?qd))"
by (simp only: decr [OF mdqdb])
finally have mdqd2: "?lhs \<longleftrightarrow> Ifm bbs bs (decr (disj ?md ?qd))" .
show ?thesis
proof (cases "?md = T")
case True
then have cT: "cooper p = T"
by (simp only: cooper_def unit_def split_def Let_def if_True) simp
from True have lhs: "?lhs"
using mdqd by simp
from True have "?rhs"
by (simp add: cooper_def unit_def split_def)
with lhs cT show ?thesis
by simp
next
case False
then have "cooper p = decr (disj ?md ?qd)"
by (simp only: cooper_def unit_def split_def Let_def if_False)
with mdqd2 decr_qf[OF mdqdb] show ?thesis
by simp
qed
qed
definition pa :: "fm \<Rightarrow> fm"
where "pa p = qelim (prep p) cooper"
theorem mirqe: "Ifm bbs bs (pa p) = Ifm bbs bs p \<and> qfree (pa p)"
using qelim_ci cooper prep by (auto simp add: pa_def)
subsection \<open>Setup\<close>
oracle linzqe_oracle = \<open>
let
fun num_of_term vs (t as Free (xn, xT)) =
(case AList.lookup (=) vs t of
NONE => error "Variable not found in the list!"
| SOME n => @{code Bound} (@{code nat_of_integer} n))
| num_of_term vs \<^term>\<open>0::int\<close> = @{code C} (@{code int_of_integer} 0)
| num_of_term vs \<^term>\<open>1::int\<close> = @{code C} (@{code int_of_integer} 1)
| num_of_term vs \<^term>\<open>- 1::int\<close> = @{code C} (@{code int_of_integer} (~ 1))
| num_of_term vs \<^Const_>\<open>numeral _ for t\<close> =
@{code C} (@{code int_of_integer} (HOLogic.dest_numeral t))
| num_of_term vs \<^Const_>\<open>uminus \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for \<^Const_>\<open>numeral \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for t\<close>\<close> =
@{code C} (@{code int_of_integer} (~(HOLogic.dest_numeral t)))
| num_of_term vs (Bound i) = @{code Bound} (@{code nat_of_integer} i)
| num_of_term vs \<^Const_>\<open>uminus \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for t'\<close> = @{code Neg} (num_of_term vs t')
| num_of_term vs \<^Const_>\<open>plus \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for t1 t2\<close> =
@{code Add} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2)
| num_of_term vs \<^Const_>\<open>minus \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for t1 t2\<close> =
@{code Sub} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2)
| num_of_term vs \<^Const_>\<open>times \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for t1 t2\<close> =
(case try HOLogic.dest_number t1 of
SOME (_, i) => @{code Mul} (@{code int_of_integer} i, num_of_term vs t2)
| NONE =>
(case try HOLogic.dest_number t2 of
SOME (_, i) => @{code Mul} (@{code int_of_integer} i, num_of_term vs t1)
| NONE => error "num_of_term: unsupported multiplication"))
| num_of_term vs t = error ("num_of_term: unknown term " ^ Syntax.string_of_term \<^context> t);
fun fm_of_term ps vs \<^Const_>\<open>True\<close> = @{code T}
| fm_of_term ps vs \<^Const_>\<open>False\<close> = @{code F}
| fm_of_term ps vs \<^Const_>\<open>less \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for t1 t2\<close> =
@{code Lt} (@{code Sub} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2))
| fm_of_term ps vs \<^Const_>\<open>less_eq \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for t1 t2\<close> =
@{code Le} (@{code Sub} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2))
| fm_of_term ps vs \<^Const_>\<open>HOL.eq \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for t1 t2\<close> =
@{code Eq} (@{code Sub} (num_of_term vs t1, num_of_term vs t2))
| fm_of_term ps vs \<^Const_>\<open>dvd \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for t1 t2\<close> =
(case try HOLogic.dest_number t1 of
SOME (_, i) => @{code Dvd} (@{code int_of_integer} i, num_of_term vs t2)
| NONE => error "num_of_term: unsupported dvd")
| fm_of_term ps vs \<^Const_>\<open>HOL.eq \<^Type>\<open>bool\<close> for t1 t2\<close> =
@{code Iff} (fm_of_term ps vs t1, fm_of_term ps vs t2)
| fm_of_term ps vs \<^Const_>\<open>HOL.conj for t1 t2\<close> =
@{code And} (fm_of_term ps vs t1, fm_of_term ps vs t2)
| fm_of_term ps vs \<^Const_>\<open>HOL.disj for t1 t2\<close> =
@{code Or} (fm_of_term ps vs t1, fm_of_term ps vs t2)
| fm_of_term ps vs \<^Const_>\<open>HOL.implies for t1 t2\<close> =
@{code Imp} (fm_of_term ps vs t1, fm_of_term ps vs t2)
| fm_of_term ps vs \<^Const_>\<open>HOL.Not for t'\<close> =
@{code Not} (fm_of_term ps vs t')
| fm_of_term ps vs \<^Const_>\<open>Ex _ for \<open>t as Abs _\<close>\<close> =
let
val (x', p') = Term.dest_abs_global t;
val vs' = (Free x', 0) :: map (fn (v, n) => (v, n + 1)) vs;
in @{code E} (fm_of_term ps vs' p') end
| fm_of_term ps vs \<^Const_>\<open>All _ for \<open>t as Abs _\<close>\<close> =
let
val (x', p') = Term.dest_abs_global t;
val vs' = (Free x', 0) :: map (fn (v, n) => (v, n + 1)) vs;
in @{code A} (fm_of_term ps vs' p') end
| fm_of_term ps vs t = error ("fm_of_term : unknown term " ^ Syntax.string_of_term \<^context> t);
fun term_of_num vs (@{code C} i) = HOLogic.mk_number HOLogic.intT (@{code integer_of_int} i)
| term_of_num vs (@{code Bound} n) =
let
val q = @{code integer_of_nat} n
in fst (the (find_first (fn (_, m) => q = m) vs)) end
| term_of_num vs (@{code Neg} t') = \<^Const>\<open>uminus \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for \<open>term_of_num vs t'\<close>\<close>
| term_of_num vs (@{code Add} (t1, t2)) =
\<^Const>\<open>plus \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for \<open>term_of_num vs t1\<close> \<open>term_of_num vs t2\<close>\<close>
| term_of_num vs (@{code Sub} (t1, t2)) =
\<^Const>\<open>minus \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for \<open>term_of_num vs t1\<close> \<open>term_of_num vs t2\<close>\<close>
| term_of_num vs (@{code Mul} (i, t2)) =
\<^Const>\<open>times \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for \<open>term_of_num vs (@{code C} i)\<close> \<open>term_of_num vs t2\<close>\<close>
| term_of_num vs (@{code CN} (n, i, t)) =
term_of_num vs (@{code Add} (@{code Mul} (i, @{code Bound} n), t));
fun term_of_fm ps vs @{code T} = \<^Const>\<open>True\<close>
| term_of_fm ps vs @{code F} = \<^Const>\<open>False\<close>
| term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Lt} t) =
\<^Const>\<open>less \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for \<open>term_of_num vs t\<close> \<^term>\<open>0::int\<close>\<close>
| term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Le} t) =
\<^Const>\<open>less_eq \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for \<open>term_of_num vs t\<close> \<^term>\<open>0::int\<close>\<close>
| term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Gt} t) =
\<^Const>\<open>less \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for \<^term>\<open>0::int\<close> \<open>term_of_num vs t\<close>\<close>
| term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Ge} t) =
\<^Const>\<open>less_eq \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for \<^term>\<open>0::int\<close> \<open>term_of_num vs t\<close>\<close>
| term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Eq} t) =
\<^Const>\<open>HOL.eq \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for \<open>term_of_num vs t\<close> \<^term>\<open>0::int\<close>\<close>
| term_of_fm ps vs (@{code NEq} t) =
term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Not} (@{code Eq} t))
| term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Dvd} (i, t)) =
\<^Const>\<open>dvd \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for \<open>term_of_num vs (@{code C} i)\<close> \<open>term_of_num vs t\<close>\<close>
| term_of_fm ps vs (@{code NDvd} (i, t)) =
term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Not} (@{code Dvd} (i, t)))
| term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Not} t') =
\<^Const>\<open>HOL.Not for \<open>term_of_fm ps vs t'\<close>\<close>
| term_of_fm ps vs (@{code And} (t1, t2)) =
\<^Const>\<open>HOL.conj for \<open>term_of_fm ps vs t1\<close> \<open>term_of_fm ps vs t2\<close>\<close>
| term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Or} (t1, t2)) =
\<^Const>\<open>HOL.disj for \<open>term_of_fm ps vs t1\<close> \<open>term_of_fm ps vs t2\<close>\<close>
| term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Imp} (t1, t2)) =
\<^Const>\<open>HOL.implies for \<open>term_of_fm ps vs t1\<close> \<open>term_of_fm ps vs t2\<close>\<close>
| term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Iff} (t1, t2)) =
\<^Const>\<open>HOL.eq \<^Type>\<open>bool\<close> for \<open>term_of_fm ps vs t1\<close> \<open>term_of_fm ps vs t2\<close>\<close>
| term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Closed} n) =
let
val q = @{code integer_of_nat} n
in (fst o the) (find_first (fn (_, m) => m = q) ps) end
| term_of_fm ps vs (@{code NClosed} n) = term_of_fm ps vs (@{code Not} (@{code Closed} n));
fun term_bools acc t =
let
val is_op =
member (=) [\<^Const>\<open>HOL.conj\<close>, \<^Const>\<open>HOL.disj\<close>, \<^Const>\<open>HOL.implies\<close>,
\<^Const>\<open>HOL.eq \<^Type>\<open>bool\<close>\<close>,
\<^Const>\<open>HOL.eq \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>\<close>, \<^Const>\<open>less \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>\<close>,
\<^Const>\<open>less_eq \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>\<close>, \<^Const>\<open>HOL.Not\<close>, \<^Const>\<open>All \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>\<close>,
\<^Const>\<open>Ex \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>\<close>, \<^Const>\<open>True\<close>, \<^Const>\<open>False\<close>]
fun is_ty t = not (fastype_of t = \<^Type>\<open>bool\<close>)
in
(case t of
(l as f $ a) $ b =>
if is_ty t orelse is_op t then term_bools (term_bools acc l) b
else insert (op aconv) t acc
| f $ a =>
if is_ty t orelse is_op t then term_bools (term_bools acc f) a
else insert (op aconv) t acc
| Abs _ => term_bools acc (snd (Term.dest_abs_global t))
| _ => if is_ty t orelse is_op t then acc else insert (op aconv) t acc)
end;
in
fn (ctxt, t) =>
let
val fs = Misc_Legacy.term_frees t;
val bs = term_bools [] t;
val vs = map_index swap fs;
val ps = map_index swap bs;
val t' = term_of_fm ps vs (@{code pa} (fm_of_term ps vs t));
in Thm.cterm_of ctxt (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (HOLogic.mk_eq (t, t'))) end
end
\<close>
ML_file \<open>cooper_tac.ML\<close>
method_setup cooper = \<open>
Scan.lift (Args.mode "no_quantify") >>
(fn q => fn ctxt => SIMPLE_METHOD' (Cooper_Tac.linz_tac ctxt (not q)))
\<close> "decision procedure for linear integer arithmetic"
subsection \<open>Tests\<close>
lemma "\<exists>(j::int). \<forall>x\<ge>j. \<exists>a b. x = 3*a+5*b"
by cooper
lemma "\<forall>(x::int) \<ge> 8. \<exists>i j. 5*i + 3*j = x"
by cooper
theorem "(\<forall>(y::int). 3 dvd y) \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>(x::int). b < x \<longrightarrow> a \<le> x"
by cooper
theorem "\<And>(y::int) (z::int) (n::int). 3 dvd z \<Longrightarrow> 2 dvd (y::int) \<Longrightarrow>
(\<exists>(x::int). 2*x = y) \<and> (\<exists>(k::int). 3*k = z)"
by cooper
theorem "\<And>(y::int) (z::int) n. Suc n < 6 \<Longrightarrow> 3 dvd z \<Longrightarrow>
2 dvd (y::int) \<Longrightarrow> (\<exists>(x::int). 2*x = y) \<and> (\<exists>(k::int). 3*k = z)"
by cooper
theorem "\<forall>(x::nat). \<exists>(y::nat). (0::nat) \<le> 5 \<longrightarrow> y = 5 + x"
by cooper
lemma "\<forall>(x::int) \<ge> 8. \<exists>i j. 5*i + 3*j = x"
by cooper
lemma "\<forall>(y::int) (z::int) (n::int).
3 dvd z \<longrightarrow> 2 dvd (y::int) \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>(x::int). 2*x = y) \<and> (\<exists>(k::int). 3*k = z)"
by cooper
lemma "\<forall>(x::int) y. x < y \<longrightarrow> 2 * x + 1 < 2 * y"
by cooper
lemma "\<forall>(x::int) y. 2 * x + 1 \<noteq> 2 * y"
by cooper
lemma "\<exists>(x::int) y. 0 < x \<and> 0 \<le> y \<and> 3 * x - 5 * y = 1"
by cooper
lemma "\<not> (\<exists>(x::int) (y::int) (z::int). 4*x + (-6::int)*y = 1)"
by cooper
lemma "\<forall>(x::int). 2 dvd x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>(y::int). x = 2*y)"
by cooper
lemma "\<forall>(x::int). 2 dvd x \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>(y::int). x = 2*y)"
by cooper
lemma "\<forall>(x::int). 2 dvd x \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>(y::int). x \<noteq> 2*y + 1)"
by cooper
lemma "\<not> (\<forall>(x::int).
(2 dvd x \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>(y::int). x \<noteq> 2*y+1) \<or>
(\<exists>(q::int) (u::int) i. 3*i + 2*q - u < 17) \<longrightarrow> 0 < x \<or> (\<not> 3 dvd x \<and> x + 8 = 0)))"
by cooper
lemma "\<not> (\<forall>(i::int). 4 \<le> i \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>x y. 0 \<le> x \<and> 0 \<le> y \<and> 3 * x + 5 * y = i))"
by cooper
lemma "\<exists>j. \<forall>(x::int) \<ge> j. \<exists>i j. 5*i + 3*j = x"
by cooper
theorem "(\<forall>(y::int). 3 dvd y) \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>(x::int). b < x \<longrightarrow> a \<le> x"
by cooper
theorem "\<And>(y::int) (z::int) (n::int). 3 dvd z \<Longrightarrow> 2 dvd (y::int) \<Longrightarrow>
(\<exists>(x::int). 2*x = y) \<and> (\<exists>(k::int). 3*k = z)"
by cooper
theorem "\<And>(y::int) (z::int) n. Suc n < 6 \<Longrightarrow> 3 dvd z \<Longrightarrow>
2 dvd (y::int) \<Longrightarrow> (\<exists>(x::int). 2*x = y) \<and> (\<exists>(k::int). 3*k = z)"
by cooper
theorem "\<forall>(x::nat). \<exists>(y::nat). (0::nat) \<le> 5 \<longrightarrow> y = 5 + x"
by cooper
theorem "\<forall>(x::nat). \<exists>(y::nat). y = 5 + x \<or> x div 6 + 1 = 2"
by cooper
theorem "\<exists>(x::int). 0 < x"
by cooper
theorem "\<forall>(x::int) y. x < y \<longrightarrow> 2 * x + 1 < 2 * y"
by cooper
theorem "\<forall>(x::int) y. 2 * x + 1 \<noteq> 2 * y"
by cooper
theorem "\<exists>(x::int) y. 0 < x \<and> 0 \<le> y \<and> 3 * x - 5 * y = 1"
by cooper
theorem "\<not> (\<exists>(x::int) (y::int) (z::int). 4*x + (-6::int)*y = 1)"
by cooper
theorem "\<not> (\<exists>(x::int). False)"
by cooper
theorem "\<forall>(x::int). 2 dvd x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>(y::int). x = 2*y)"
by cooper
theorem "\<forall>(x::int). 2 dvd x \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>(y::int). x = 2*y)"
by cooper
theorem "\<forall>(x::int). 2 dvd x \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>(y::int). x = 2*y)"
by cooper
theorem "\<forall>(x::int). 2 dvd x \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>(y::int). x \<noteq> 2*y + 1)"
by cooper
theorem
"\<not> (\<forall>(x::int).
(2 dvd x \<longleftrightarrow>
(\<forall>(y::int). x \<noteq> 2*y+1) \<or>
(\<exists>(q::int) (u::int) i. 3*i + 2*q - u < 17)
\<longrightarrow> 0 < x \<or> (\<not> 3 dvd x \<and> x + 8 = 0)))"
by cooper
theorem "\<not> (\<forall>(i::int). 4 \<le> i \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>x y. 0 \<le> x \<and> 0 \<le> y \<and> 3 * x + 5 * y = i))"
by cooper
theorem "\<forall>(i::int). 8 \<le> i \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>x y. 0 \<le> x \<and> 0 \<le> y \<and> 3 * x + 5 * y = i)"
by cooper
theorem "\<exists>(j::int). \<forall>i. j \<le> i \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>x y. 0 \<le> x \<and> 0 \<le> y \<and> 3 * x + 5 * y = i)"
by cooper
theorem "\<not> (\<forall>j (i::int). j \<le> i \<longrightarrow> (\<exists>x y. 0 \<le> x \<and> 0 \<le> y \<and> 3 * x + 5 * y = i))"
by cooper
theorem "(\<exists>m::nat. n = 2 * m) \<longrightarrow> (n + 1) div 2 = n div 2"
by cooper
subsection \<open>Variant for HOL-Main\<close>
export_code pa T Bound nat_of_integer integer_of_nat int_of_integer integer_of_int
in Eval module_name Cooper_Procedure file_prefix cooper_procedure
end