Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:47:27 +0200 use a more robust naming convention for "polymorphic" frees -- the check is an overapproximation but that's fine as far as soundness is concerned
blanchet [Wed, 20 Jul 2011 23:47:27 +0200] rev 43936
use a more robust naming convention for "polymorphic" frees -- the check is an overapproximation but that's fine as far as soundness is concerned
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -1 +1 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip