Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:50:52 +0200 now freezes Vars in order to prevent errors in cases like these:
paulson [Thu, 29 Jun 2000 16:50:52 +0200] rev 9191
now freezes Vars in order to prevent errors in cases like these: Goal "Suc (x + i + j) + ?q ?ii ?jj + k + x = xxx"; Goal "Suc (x + i + j) = x + f(?q i j) + k"; Goal "Suc (x + i + j) = x + ?q i j + k"; Goal "Suc (?q ?ii ?jj + i + j) + ?rq ?ii ?jj + k + ?q ?ii ?jj = xxx";
Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:19:27 +0200 tidied proofs using default rule equalityCE
paulson [Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:19:27 +0200] rev 9190
tidied proofs using default rule equalityCE
Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:17:18 +0200 the default equalityCE simplifies proofs
paulson [Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:17:18 +0200] rev 9189
the default equalityCE simplifies proofs
Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:16:43 +0200 tidied
paulson [Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:16:43 +0200] rev 9188
tidied
Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:15:08 +0200 fixed proof to cope with the default of equalityCE instead of equalityE
paulson [Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:15:08 +0200] rev 9187
fixed proof to cope with the default of equalityCE instead of equalityE
Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:14:45 +0200 now uses equalityCE, which usually is more efficent than equalityE
paulson [Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:14:45 +0200] rev 9186
now uses equalityCE, which usually is more efficent than equalityE
Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:14:04 +0200 weak elimination rules
paulson [Thu, 29 Jun 2000 12:14:04 +0200] rev 9185
weak elimination rules
Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:15:02 +0200 classical 'elimify' attribute;
wenzelm [Wed, 28 Jun 2000 21:15:02 +0200] rev 9184
classical 'elimify' attribute;
Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:57:16 +0200 tuned for ProofGeneral 3.2
kleing [Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:57:16 +0200] rev 9183
tuned for ProofGeneral 3.2
Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:56:21 +0200 tuning, eliminated rev_surj
kleing [Wed, 28 Jun 2000 19:56:21 +0200] rev 9182
tuning, eliminated rev_surj
(0) -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip