Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:07:14 +0100 prefer typedef without alternative name;
wenzelm [Wed, 30 Nov 2011 18:07:14 +0100] rev 45696
prefer typedef without alternative name;
Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:30:01 +0100 prefer cpodef without extra definition;
wenzelm [Wed, 30 Nov 2011 17:30:01 +0100] rev 45695
prefer cpodef without extra definition;
Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:27:10 +0100 prefer typedef without extra definition and alternative name;
wenzelm [Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:27:10 +0100] rev 45694
prefer typedef without extra definition and alternative name; tuned proofs;
Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:05:15 +0100 tuned layout;
wenzelm [Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:05:15 +0100] rev 45693
tuned layout;
Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:03:18 +0100 tuned header;
wenzelm [Wed, 30 Nov 2011 16:03:18 +0100] rev 45692
tuned header;
Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:09:29 +0100 updated version information;
wenzelm [Wed, 30 Nov 2011 12:09:29 +0100] rev 45691
updated version information;
Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:36:46 +0100 removed outdated comment
kuncar [Wed, 30 Nov 2011 11:36:46 +0100] rev 45690
removed outdated comment
Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:07:32 +0100 adding examples for the potential counterexamples in the simple scheme
bulwahn [Wed, 30 Nov 2011 10:07:32 +0100] rev 45689
adding examples for the potential counterexamples in the simple scheme
Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:35:58 +0100 also potential counterexamples in the simple exhaustive testing in quickcheck
bulwahn [Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:35:58 +0100] rev 45688
also potential counterexamples in the simple exhaustive testing in quickcheck
Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:21:18 +0100 quickcheck does not show evaluation terms of equations if they are simply free variables to avoid duplicated output; tuned
bulwahn [Wed, 30 Nov 2011 09:21:18 +0100] rev 45687
quickcheck does not show evaluation terms of equations if they are simply free variables to avoid duplicated output; tuned
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip