Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:09:27 +0100 tuning
blanchet [Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:09:27 +0100] rev 46106
tuning
Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:03:49 +0100 updated Nitpick docs after "set" reintroduction
blanchet [Tue, 03 Jan 2012 23:03:49 +0100] rev 46105
updated Nitpick docs after "set" reintroduction
Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100 no abuse of notation
blanchet [Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100] rev 46104
no abuse of notation
Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100 always treat "unit" as a deep datatype, so that we get a good interaction with the record syntax (2.7 of the Nitpick manual)
blanchet [Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100] rev 46103
always treat "unit" as a deep datatype, so that we get a good interaction with the record syntax (2.7 of the Nitpick manual)
Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100 more robust destruction of "set Collect" idiom
blanchet [Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100] rev 46102
more robust destruction of "set Collect" idiom
Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100 handle starred predicates correctly w.r.t. "set"
blanchet [Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100] rev 46101
handle starred predicates correctly w.r.t. "set"
Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100 handle "Id" gracefully w.r.t. "set"
blanchet [Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100] rev 46100
handle "Id" gracefully w.r.t. "set"
Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100 reintroduced 'refute' calls taken out after reintroducing the "set" constructor, and use "expect" feature
blanchet [Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100] rev 46099
reintroduced 'refute' calls taken out after reintroducing the "set" constructor, and use "expect" feature
Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100 handle "set" correctly in Refute -- inspired by old code from Isabelle2007
blanchet [Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100] rev 46098
handle "set" correctly in Refute -- inspired by old code from Isabelle2007
Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100 create consts with proper "set" types
blanchet [Tue, 03 Jan 2012 18:33:18 +0100] rev 46097
create consts with proper "set" types
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip