Sun, 03 May 2015 14:35:48 +0200 make SML/NJ more happy;
wenzelm [Sun, 03 May 2015 14:35:48 +0200] rev 60239
make SML/NJ more happy;
Sun, 03 May 2015 14:12:10 +0200 tuned message;
wenzelm [Sun, 03 May 2015 14:12:10 +0200] rev 60238
tuned message;
Sat, 02 May 2015 13:58:06 +0200 add testing file for code_dt extension of lifting
kuncar [Sat, 02 May 2015 13:58:06 +0200] rev 60237
add testing file for code_dt extension of lifting
Sat, 02 May 2015 13:58:06 +0200 handle error messages also in after_qed
kuncar [Sat, 02 May 2015 13:58:06 +0200] rev 60236
handle error messages also in after_qed
Sat, 02 May 2015 13:58:06 +0200 reorder some steps in the construction to support mutual datatypes
kuncar [Sat, 02 May 2015 13:58:06 +0200] rev 60235
reorder some steps in the construction to support mutual datatypes
Sat, 02 May 2015 13:58:06 +0200 more readable error message if some types do not correspond to sort constraints of the datatype
kuncar [Sat, 02 May 2015 13:58:06 +0200] rev 60234
more readable error message if some types do not correspond to sort constraints of the datatype
Sat, 02 May 2015 13:58:06 +0200 better precomputing
kuncar [Sat, 02 May 2015 13:58:06 +0200] rev 60233
better precomputing
Sat, 02 May 2015 13:58:06 +0200 equivalence in code_dt data structure must respect both rty and qty
kuncar [Sat, 02 May 2015 13:58:06 +0200] rev 60232
equivalence in code_dt data structure must respect both rty and qty
Sat, 02 May 2015 13:58:06 +0200 don't use the human-readable version of the rsp thm as a goal in the ML interface (there is no formal definition of its statement); make tactics more robust wrt. predicates in predicators; tuned
kuncar [Sat, 02 May 2015 13:58:06 +0200] rev 60231
don't use the human-readable version of the rsp thm as a goal in the ML interface (there is no formal definition of its statement); make tactics more robust wrt. predicates in predicators; tuned
Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:27:34 +0200 go back to the complicated code equation registration (because of type classes) that was lost in 922586b1bc87; make it even more hackish to get which code equation was used
kuncar [Mon, 13 Apr 2015 15:27:34 +0200] rev 60230
go back to the complicated code equation registration (because of type classes) that was lost in 922586b1bc87; make it even more hackish to get which code equation was used
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 tip