Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:18:11 +0100 gen_eq_set, remove (op =);
wenzelm [Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:18:11 +0100] rev 19303
gen_eq_set, remove (op =);
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:18:10 +0100 abbreviation upto, length;
wenzelm [Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:18:10 +0100] rev 19302
abbreviation upto, length;
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:18:09 +0100 added subtract;
wenzelm [Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:18:09 +0100] rev 19301
added subtract; tuned;
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:18:07 +0100 subtract (op =);
wenzelm [Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:18:07 +0100] rev 19300
subtract (op =);
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:18:06 +0100 remove (op =);
wenzelm [Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:18:06 +0100] rev 19299
remove (op =);
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:17:38 +0100 Now SML/NJ-friendly (IntInf)
paulson [Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:17:38 +0100] rev 19298
Now SML/NJ-friendly (IntInf)
Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:16:43 +0100 Removal of unnecessary simprules: simproc cancel_numerals now works without
paulson [Tue, 21 Mar 2006 12:16:43 +0100] rev 19297
Removal of unnecessary simprules: simproc cancel_numerals now works without add_Suc, while the reason for the horrible isolateSuc is not known.
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:29:04 +0100 interpret: Proof.assert_forward_or_chain;
wenzelm [Mon, 20 Mar 2006 21:29:04 +0100] rev 19296
interpret: Proof.assert_forward_or_chain;
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:38:22 +0100 subsetI is often necessary
paulson [Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:38:22 +0100] rev 19295
subsetI is often necessary
Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:37:11 +0100 Now the setup for cancel_numerals accepts mixed Sucs/+ where the Sucs no longer
paulson [Mon, 20 Mar 2006 17:37:11 +0100] rev 19294
Now the setup for cancel_numerals accepts mixed Sucs/+ where the Sucs no longer need to be outermost.
(0) -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip