Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:14:56 +0200 parentheses around nested cases
blanchet [Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:14:56 +0200] rev 36496
parentheses around nested cases
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:06:27 +0200 merged
blanchet [Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:06:27 +0200] rev 36495
merged
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:05:38 +0200 add an Isar proof found with Sledgehammer that involves a Skolem constant (internally)
blanchet [Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:05:38 +0200] rev 36494
add an Isar proof found with Sledgehammer that involves a Skolem constant (internally)
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:03:49 +0200 reintroduced short names for HOL->FOL constants; other parts of the code rely on these
blanchet [Wed, 28 Apr 2010 16:03:49 +0200] rev 36493
reintroduced short names for HOL->FOL constants; other parts of the code rely on these
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:53:17 +0200 save the name of Skolemized variables in Sledgehammer for use in the proof reconstruction code
blanchet [Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:53:17 +0200] rev 36492
save the name of Skolemized variables in Sledgehammer for use in the proof reconstruction code
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:34:55 +0200 unskolemize formulas in proof reconstruction + detect newer SPASS versions to avoid truncating identifiers if not necessary (truncating confuses proof reconstruction)
blanchet [Wed, 28 Apr 2010 15:34:55 +0200] rev 36491
unskolemize formulas in proof reconstruction + detect newer SPASS versions to avoid truncating identifiers if not necessary (truncating confuses proof reconstruction)
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:19:26 +0200 redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
blanchet [Wed, 28 Apr 2010 14:19:26 +0200] rev 36490
redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:32:45 +0200 removed "sorts" option, continued
blanchet [Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:32:45 +0200] rev 36489
removed "sorts" option, continued
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:00:30 +0200 remove Sledgehammer's "sorts" option to annotate variables with sorts in proof;
blanchet [Wed, 28 Apr 2010 13:00:30 +0200] rev 36488
remove Sledgehammer's "sorts" option to annotate variables with sorts in proof; what we need is smarter type annotations for variables _and_ constants
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:49:52 +0200 insert a nice proof found by Vampire, which demonstrates the use of "let" in Isar proofs
blanchet [Wed, 28 Apr 2010 12:49:52 +0200] rev 36487
insert a nice proof found by Vampire, which demonstrates the use of "let" in Isar proofs
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip