Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:09:13 +0200 ML_Compiler.eval: reported positions need to contain offset, to avoid displaced reports due to synthesized line numbers;
wenzelm [Thu, 09 Sep 2010 20:09:13 +0200] rev 39240
ML_Compiler.eval: reported positions need to contain offset, to avoid displaced reports due to synthesized line numbers;
Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:32:21 +0200 NEWS: some notes on interrupts;
wenzelm [Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:32:21 +0200] rev 39239
NEWS: some notes on interrupts;
Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:21:06 +0200 refined Runtime.toplevel_error/Document.run_command: let interrupts pass unhindered;
wenzelm [Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:21:06 +0200] rev 39238
refined Runtime.toplevel_error/Document.run_command: let interrupts pass unhindered;
Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:18:34 +0200 removed dead code;
wenzelm [Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:18:34 +0200] rev 39237
removed dead code;
Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:17:34 +0200 avoid handling interrupts in user code;
wenzelm [Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:17:34 +0200] rev 39236
avoid handling interrupts in user code;
Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:04:35 +0200 Meson.make_clauses_unsorted: removed spurious debug code stemming from 5146d640aa4a -- must not handle arbitrary exceptions in user space;
wenzelm [Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:04:35 +0200] rev 39235
Meson.make_clauses_unsorted: removed spurious debug code stemming from 5146d640aa4a -- must not handle arbitrary exceptions in user space;
Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:00:16 +0200 main command loops are supposed to be uninterruptible -- no special treatment here;
wenzelm [Thu, 09 Sep 2010 18:00:16 +0200] rev 39234
main command loops are supposed to be uninterruptible -- no special treatment here;
Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:38:45 +0200 Exn.is_interrupt: include interrupts that have passed through the IO layer;
wenzelm [Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:38:45 +0200] rev 39233
Exn.is_interrupt: include interrupts that have passed through the IO layer;
Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:20:27 +0200 more abstract treatment of interrupts in structure Exn -- hardly ever need to mention Interrupt literally;
wenzelm [Thu, 09 Sep 2010 17:20:27 +0200] rev 39232
more abstract treatment of interrupts in structure Exn -- hardly ever need to mention Interrupt literally;
Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:05:52 +0200 avoid mixing of static and runtime errors in compiler output, to accomodate Proof General;
wenzelm [Thu, 09 Sep 2010 11:05:52 +0200] rev 39231
avoid mixing of static and runtime errors in compiler output, to accomodate Proof General; refrain from absorbing Exn.Interrupt, to accomodate asynchronous interaction; actually observe Isabelle/ML naming conventions in exception STATIC_ERRORS;
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip