Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:39:46 +0200 one-step Isar proofs are not always pointless
blanchet [Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:39:46 +0200] rev 36563
one-step Isar proofs are not always pointless
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:31:08 +0200 the SPASS output syntax is more general than I thought -- such a pity that there's no documentation
blanchet [Thu, 29 Apr 2010 17:31:08 +0200] rev 36562
the SPASS output syntax is more general than I thought -- such a pity that there's no documentation
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:41:51 +0200 redo more Metis/Sledgehammer example
blanchet [Thu, 29 Apr 2010 13:41:51 +0200] rev 36561
redo more Metis/Sledgehammer example
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:21:20 +0200 fixed definition of "bad frees" so that it actually works
blanchet [Thu, 29 Apr 2010 12:21:20 +0200] rev 36560
fixed definition of "bad frees" so that it actually works
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:38:23 +0200 don't remove last line of proof
blanchet [Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:38:23 +0200] rev 36559
don't remove last line of proof
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:22:24 +0200 handle previously unknown SPASS syntaxes in Sledgehammer's proof reconstruction
blanchet [Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:22:24 +0200] rev 36558
handle previously unknown SPASS syntaxes in Sledgehammer's proof reconstruction
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:55:59 +0200 make SML/NJ happy, take 2
blanchet [Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:55:59 +0200] rev 36557
make SML/NJ happy, take 2
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:25:26 +0200 use readable names in "debug" mode for type vars + don't pipe facts using "using" but rather give them directly to metis (works better with type variables)
blanchet [Thu, 29 Apr 2010 10:25:26 +0200] rev 36556
use readable names in "debug" mode for type vars + don't pipe facts using "using" but rather give them directly to metis (works better with type variables)
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:17:14 +0200 expand combinators in Isar proofs constructed by Sledgehammer;
blanchet [Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:17:14 +0200] rev 36555
expand combinators in Isar proofs constructed by Sledgehammer; this requires shuffling around a couple of functions previously defined in Refute
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:11:06 +0200 more neg_clausify proofs that get replaced by direct proofs
blanchet [Thu, 29 Apr 2010 01:11:06 +0200] rev 36554
more neg_clausify proofs that get replaced by direct proofs
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip