Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:23:16 +0200 tuning
blanchet [Tue, 14 Sep 2010 17:23:16 +0200] rev 39367
tuning
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:34:26 +0200 handle relevance filter corner cases more gracefully;
blanchet [Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:34:26 +0200] rev 39366
handle relevance filter corner cases more gracefully; e.g. the minimizer selects 15 facts but "max_relevant = 14"
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:33:38 +0200 remove more clutter related to old "fast_descrs" optimization
blanchet [Tue, 14 Sep 2010 16:33:38 +0200] rev 39365
remove more clutter related to old "fast_descrs" optimization
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:39:57 +0200 Sledgehammer should be called in "prove" mode;
blanchet [Tue, 14 Sep 2010 15:39:57 +0200] rev 39364
Sledgehammer should be called in "prove" mode; otherwise the proof text won't fit into the proof document
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:47:53 +0200 added a timeout around "try" call in Mirabelle
blanchet [Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:47:53 +0200] rev 39363
added a timeout around "try" call in Mirabelle
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:22:49 +0200 adapt examples to latest Nitpick changes + speed them up a little bit
blanchet [Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:22:49 +0200] rev 39362
adapt examples to latest Nitpick changes + speed them up a little bit
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:12:18 +0200 tuning
blanchet [Tue, 14 Sep 2010 14:12:18 +0200] rev 39361
tuning
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:44:43 +0200 eliminate more clutter related to "fast_descrs" optimization
blanchet [Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:44:43 +0200] rev 39360
eliminate more clutter related to "fast_descrs" optimization
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:24:18 +0200 remove "fast_descs" option from Nitpick;
blanchet [Tue, 14 Sep 2010 13:24:18 +0200] rev 39359
remove "fast_descs" option from Nitpick; the option has been unsound for over a year and is too imprecise to be of any use when made sound
Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:52:50 +0200 fixed bug in the "fast_descrs" optimization;
blanchet [Tue, 14 Sep 2010 12:52:50 +0200] rev 39358
fixed bug in the "fast_descrs" optimization; the bug is that two sets may actually be the same but because of the three-valued logic a different "The" or "Eps" is chosen; e.g. consider the set {1, 2}. If it is approximated in one place as {1, 2?} and in another place as {1?, 2}, then "Eps" would return 1 in the first case and 2 in the second case. This is of course wrong, because both sets potentially represent {1, 2}. The current fix has a very negative impact on precision.
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip