blanchet [Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:29:13 +0200] rev 38695
revert this idea of automatically invoking "metisFT" when "metis" fails;
there are very few good reasons why "metisFT" should succeed when "metis" fails, and "metisFT" tends to "diverge" more often than "metis -- furthermore the exception handling code wasn't working properly