Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:29:13 +0200 revert this idea of automatically invoking "metisFT" when "metis" fails;
blanchet [Tue, 24 Aug 2010 15:29:13 +0200] rev 38695
revert this idea of automatically invoking "metisFT" when "metis" fails; there are very few good reasons why "metisFT" should succeed when "metis" fails, and "metisFT" tends to "diverge" more often than "metis -- furthermore the exception handling code wasn't working properly
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -1 +1 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip