Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:41:04 -0700 define linear algebra concepts using scaleR instead of (op *s); generalized many lemmas, though a few theorems that used to work on type int^'n are a bit less general
huffman [Thu, 29 Apr 2010 11:41:04 -0700] rev 36593
define linear algebra concepts using scaleR instead of (op *s); generalized many lemmas, though a few theorems that used to work on type int^'n are a bit less general
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:29:47 -0700 remove unused function vector_power, unused lemma one_plus_of_nat_neq_0
huffman [Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:29:47 -0700] rev 36592
remove unused function vector_power, unused lemma one_plus_of_nat_neq_0
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:17:25 -0700 move class instantiations from Euclidean_Space.thy to Finite_Cartesian_Product.thy
huffman [Thu, 29 Apr 2010 09:17:25 -0700] rev 36591
move class instantiations from Euclidean_Space.thy to Finite_Cartesian_Product.thy
Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:22:01 -0700 remove redundant constants pastecart, fstcart, sndcart; users should prefer Pair, fst, snd instead
huffman [Thu, 29 Apr 2010 07:22:01 -0700] rev 36590
remove redundant constants pastecart, fstcart, sndcart; users should prefer Pair, fst, snd instead
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:08:31 -0700 generalize LIMSEQ_vector to tendsto_vector
huffman [Wed, 28 Apr 2010 23:08:31 -0700] rev 36589
generalize LIMSEQ_vector to tendsto_vector
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:36:45 -0700 generalize orthogonal_clauses
huffman [Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:36:45 -0700] rev 36588
generalize orthogonal_clauses
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:20:59 -0700 remove redundant lemma vector_dist_norm
huffman [Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:20:59 -0700] rev 36587
remove redundant lemma vector_dist_norm
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:02:55 -0700 remove redundant lemma norm_0
huffman [Wed, 28 Apr 2010 22:02:55 -0700] rev 36586
remove redundant lemma norm_0
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:39:14 -0700 generalize some euclidean space lemmas
huffman [Wed, 28 Apr 2010 21:39:14 -0700] rev 36585
generalize some euclidean space lemmas
Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:48:59 -0700 prove lemma openin_subopen without using choice
huffman [Wed, 28 Apr 2010 17:48:59 -0700] rev 36584
prove lemma openin_subopen without using choice
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip