
paulson@13586: (*  Title:      HOL/Library/FuncSet.thy
bulwahn@40631:     Author:     Florian Kammueller and Lawrence C Paulson, Lukas Bulwahn
paulson@13586: *)
paulson@13586: 
wenzelm@14706: header {* Pi and Function Sets *}
paulson@13586: 
nipkow@15131: theory FuncSet
haftmann@30663: imports Hilbert_Choice Main
nipkow@15131: begin
paulson@13586: 
wenzelm@19736: definition
wenzelm@21404:   Pi :: "['a set, 'a => 'b set] => ('a => 'b) set" where
wenzelm@19736:   "Pi A B = {f. \<forall>x. x \<in> A --> f x \<in> B x}"
paulson@13586: 
wenzelm@21404: definition
wenzelm@21404:   extensional :: "'a set => ('a => 'b) set" where
haftmann@28524:   "extensional A = {f. \<forall>x. x~:A --> f x = undefined}"
paulson@13586: 
wenzelm@21404: definition
wenzelm@21404:   "restrict" :: "['a => 'b, 'a set] => ('a => 'b)" where
haftmann@28524:   "restrict f A = (%x. if x \<in> A then f x else undefined)"
paulson@13586: 
wenzelm@19536: abbreviation
wenzelm@21404:   funcset :: "['a set, 'b set] => ('a => 'b) set"
wenzelm@21404:     (infixr "->" 60) where
wenzelm@19536:   "A -> B == Pi A (%_. B)"
wenzelm@19536: 
wenzelm@21210: notation (xsymbols)
wenzelm@19656:   funcset  (infixr "\<rightarrow>" 60)
wenzelm@19536: 
paulson@13586: syntax
wenzelm@19736:   "_Pi"  :: "[pttrn, 'a set, 'b set] => ('a => 'b) set"  ("(3PI _:_./ _)" 10)
wenzelm@19736:   "_lam" :: "[pttrn, 'a set, 'a => 'b] => ('a=>'b)"  ("(3%_:_./ _)" [0,0,3] 3)
paulson@13586: 
paulson@13586: syntax (xsymbols)
wenzelm@19736:   "_Pi" :: "[pttrn, 'a set, 'b set] => ('a => 'b) set"  ("(3\<Pi> _\<in>_./ _)"   10)
wenzelm@19736:   "_lam" :: "[pttrn, 'a set, 'a => 'b] => ('a=>'b)"  ("(3\<lambda>_\<in>_./ _)" [0,0,3] 3)
paulson@13586: 
kleing@14565: syntax (HTML output)
wenzelm@19736:   "_Pi" :: "[pttrn, 'a set, 'b set] => ('a => 'b) set"  ("(3\<Pi> _\<in>_./ _)"   10)
wenzelm@19736:   "_lam" :: "[pttrn, 'a set, 'a => 'b] => ('a=>'b)"  ("(3\<lambda>_\<in>_./ _)" [0,0,3] 3)
kleing@14565: 
paulson@13586: translations
wenzelm@20770:   "PI x:A. B" == "CONST Pi A (%x. B)"
wenzelm@20770:   "%x:A. f" == "CONST restrict (%x. f) A"
paulson@13586: 
wenzelm@19736: definition
wenzelm@21404:   "compose" :: "['a set, 'b => 'c, 'a => 'b] => ('a => 'c)" where
wenzelm@19736:   "compose A g f = (\<lambda>x\<in>A. g (f x))"
paulson@13586: 
paulson@13586: 
paulson@13586: subsection{*Basic Properties of @{term Pi}*}
paulson@13586: 
nipkow@31754: lemma Pi_I[intro!]: "(!!x. x \<in> A ==> f x \<in> B x) ==> f \<in> Pi A B"
wenzelm@14706:   by (simp add: Pi_def)
paulson@13586: 
nipkow@31731: lemma Pi_I'[simp]: "(!!x. x : A --> f x : B x) ==> f : Pi A B"
nipkow@31731: by(simp add:Pi_def)
nipkow@31731: 
paulson@13586: lemma funcsetI: "(!!x. x \<in> A ==> f x \<in> B) ==> f \<in> A -> B"
wenzelm@14706:   by (simp add: Pi_def)
paulson@13586: 
paulson@13586: lemma Pi_mem: "[|f: Pi A B; x \<in> A|] ==> f x \<in> B x"
wenzelm@14706:   by (simp add: Pi_def)
paulson@13586: 
nipkow@31759: lemma PiE [elim]:
nipkow@31754:   "f : Pi A B ==> (f x : B x ==> Q) ==> (x ~: A ==> Q) ==> Q"
nipkow@31754: by(auto simp: Pi_def)
nipkow@31754: 
hoelzl@38656: lemma Pi_cong:
hoelzl@38656:   "(\<And> w. w \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> f w = g w) \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> Pi A B \<longleftrightarrow> g \<in> Pi A B"
hoelzl@38656:   by (auto simp: Pi_def)
hoelzl@38656: 
haftmann@31769: lemma funcset_id [simp]: "(\<lambda>x. x) \<in> A \<rightarrow> A"
wenzelm@44382:   by auto
haftmann@31769: 
paulson@13586: lemma funcset_mem: "[|f \<in> A -> B; x \<in> A|] ==> f x \<in> B"
wenzelm@14706:   by (simp add: Pi_def)
paulson@13586: 
paulson@14762: lemma funcset_image: "f \<in> A\<rightarrow>B ==> f ` A \<subseteq> B"
nipkow@31754: by auto
paulson@14762: 
nipkow@31754: lemma Pi_eq_empty[simp]: "((PI x: A. B x) = {}) = (\<exists>x\<in>A. B(x) = {})"
paulson@13593: apply (simp add: Pi_def, auto)
paulson@13586: txt{*Converse direction requires Axiom of Choice to exhibit a function
paulson@13586: picking an element from each non-empty @{term "B x"}*}
paulson@13593: apply (drule_tac x = "%u. SOME y. y \<in> B u" in spec, auto)
wenzelm@14706: apply (cut_tac P= "%y. y \<in> B x" in some_eq_ex, auto)
paulson@13586: done
paulson@13586: 
paulson@13593: lemma Pi_empty [simp]: "Pi {} B = UNIV"
nipkow@31754: by (simp add: Pi_def)
paulson@13593: 
paulson@13593: lemma Pi_UNIV [simp]: "A -> UNIV = UNIV"
nipkow@31754: by (simp add: Pi_def)
nipkow@31727: (*
nipkow@31727: lemma funcset_id [simp]: "(%x. x): A -> A"
nipkow@31727:   by (simp add: Pi_def)
nipkow@31727: *)
paulson@13586: text{*Covariance of Pi-sets in their second argument*}
paulson@13586: lemma Pi_mono: "(!!x. x \<in> A ==> B x <= C x) ==> Pi A B <= Pi A C"
nipkow@31754: by auto
paulson@13586: 
paulson@13586: text{*Contravariance of Pi-sets in their first argument*}
paulson@13586: lemma Pi_anti_mono: "A' <= A ==> Pi A B <= Pi A' B"
nipkow@31754: by auto
paulson@13586: 
paulson@33271: lemma prod_final:
paulson@33271:   assumes 1: "fst \<circ> f \<in> Pi A B" and 2: "snd \<circ> f \<in> Pi A C"
paulson@33271:   shows "f \<in> (\<Pi> z \<in> A. B z \<times> C z)"
paulson@33271: proof (rule Pi_I) 
paulson@33271:   fix z
paulson@33271:   assume z: "z \<in> A" 
paulson@33271:   have "f z = (fst (f z), snd (f z))" 
paulson@33271:     by simp
paulson@33271:   also have "...  \<in> B z \<times> C z"
paulson@33271:     by (metis SigmaI PiE o_apply 1 2 z) 
paulson@33271:   finally show "f z \<in> B z \<times> C z" .
paulson@33271: qed
paulson@33271: 
paulson@13586: 
paulson@13586: subsection{*Composition With a Restricted Domain: @{term compose}*}
paulson@13586: 
wenzelm@14706: lemma funcset_compose:
nipkow@31754:   "[| f \<in> A -> B; g \<in> B -> C |]==> compose A g f \<in> A -> C"
nipkow@31754: by (simp add: Pi_def compose_def restrict_def)
paulson@13586: 
paulson@13586: lemma compose_assoc:
wenzelm@14706:     "[| f \<in> A -> B; g \<in> B -> C; h \<in> C -> D |]
paulson@13586:       ==> compose A h (compose A g f) = compose A (compose B h g) f"
nipkow@39302: by (simp add: fun_eq_iff Pi_def compose_def restrict_def)
paulson@13586: 
paulson@13586: lemma compose_eq: "x \<in> A ==> compose A g f x = g(f(x))"
nipkow@31754: by (simp add: compose_def restrict_def)
paulson@13586: 
paulson@13586: lemma surj_compose: "[| f ` A = B; g ` B = C |] ==> compose A g f ` A = C"
wenzelm@14706:   by (auto simp add: image_def compose_eq)
paulson@13586: 
paulson@13586: 
paulson@13586: subsection{*Bounded Abstraction: @{term restrict}*}
paulson@13586: 
paulson@13586: lemma restrict_in_funcset: "(!!x. x \<in> A ==> f x \<in> B) ==> (\<lambda>x\<in>A. f x) \<in> A -> B"
wenzelm@14706:   by (simp add: Pi_def restrict_def)
paulson@13586: 
nipkow@31754: lemma restrictI[intro!]: "(!!x. x \<in> A ==> f x \<in> B x) ==> (\<lambda>x\<in>A. f x) \<in> Pi A B"
wenzelm@14706:   by (simp add: Pi_def restrict_def)
paulson@13586: 
paulson@13586: lemma restrict_apply [simp]:
haftmann@28524:     "(\<lambda>y\<in>A. f y) x = (if x \<in> A then f x else undefined)"
wenzelm@14706:   by (simp add: restrict_def)
paulson@13586: 
wenzelm@14706: lemma restrict_ext:
paulson@13586:     "(!!x. x \<in> A ==> f x = g x) ==> (\<lambda>x\<in>A. f x) = (\<lambda>x\<in>A. g x)"
nipkow@39302:   by (simp add: fun_eq_iff Pi_def restrict_def)
paulson@13586: 
paulson@14853: lemma inj_on_restrict_eq [simp]: "inj_on (restrict f A) A = inj_on f A"
wenzelm@14706:   by (simp add: inj_on_def restrict_def)
paulson@13586: 
paulson@13586: lemma Id_compose:
wenzelm@14706:     "[|f \<in> A -> B;  f \<in> extensional A|] ==> compose A (\<lambda>y\<in>B. y) f = f"
nipkow@39302:   by (auto simp add: fun_eq_iff compose_def extensional_def Pi_def)
paulson@13586: 
paulson@13586: lemma compose_Id:
wenzelm@14706:     "[|g \<in> A -> B;  g \<in> extensional A|] ==> compose A g (\<lambda>x\<in>A. x) = g"
nipkow@39302:   by (auto simp add: fun_eq_iff compose_def extensional_def Pi_def)
paulson@13586: 
paulson@14853: lemma image_restrict_eq [simp]: "(restrict f A) ` A = f ` A"
wenzelm@19736:   by (auto simp add: restrict_def)
paulson@13586: 
paulson@14745: 
paulson@14762: subsection{*Bijections Between Sets*}
paulson@14762: 
nipkow@26106: text{*The definition of @{const bij_betw} is in @{text "Fun.thy"}, but most of
paulson@14762: the theorems belong here, or need at least @{term Hilbert_Choice}.*}
paulson@14762: 
nipkow@39595: lemma bij_betwI:
nipkow@39595: assumes "f \<in> A \<rightarrow> B" and "g \<in> B \<rightarrow> A"
nipkow@39595:     and g_f: "\<And>x. x\<in>A \<Longrightarrow> g (f x) = x" and f_g: "\<And>y. y\<in>B \<Longrightarrow> f (g y) = y"
nipkow@39595: shows "bij_betw f A B"
nipkow@39595: unfolding bij_betw_def
nipkow@39595: proof
nipkow@39595:   show "inj_on f A" by (metis g_f inj_on_def)
nipkow@39595: next
nipkow@39595:   have "f ` A \<subseteq> B" using `f \<in> A \<rightarrow> B` by auto
nipkow@39595:   moreover
nipkow@39595:   have "B \<subseteq> f ` A" by auto (metis Pi_mem `g \<in> B \<rightarrow> A` f_g image_iff)
nipkow@39595:   ultimately show "f ` A = B" by blast
nipkow@39595: qed
nipkow@39595: 
paulson@14762: lemma bij_betw_imp_funcset: "bij_betw f A B \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> A \<rightarrow> B"
nipkow@32988: by (auto simp add: bij_betw_def)
paulson@14762: 
paulson@14853: lemma inj_on_compose:
nipkow@31754:   "[| bij_betw f A B; inj_on g B |] ==> inj_on (compose A g f) A"
nipkow@31754: by (auto simp add: bij_betw_def inj_on_def compose_eq)
paulson@14853: 
paulson@14762: lemma bij_betw_compose:
nipkow@31754:   "[| bij_betw f A B; bij_betw g B C |] ==> bij_betw (compose A g f) A C"
nipkow@31754: apply (simp add: bij_betw_def compose_eq inj_on_compose)
nipkow@31754: apply (auto simp add: compose_def image_def)
nipkow@31754: done
paulson@14762: 
paulson@14853: lemma bij_betw_restrict_eq [simp]:
nipkow@31754:   "bij_betw (restrict f A) A B = bij_betw f A B"
nipkow@31754: by (simp add: bij_betw_def)
paulson@14853: 
paulson@14853: 
paulson@14853: subsection{*Extensionality*}
paulson@14853: 
haftmann@28524: lemma extensional_arb: "[|f \<in> extensional A; x\<notin> A|] ==> f x = undefined"
nipkow@31754: by (simp add: extensional_def)
paulson@14853: 
paulson@14853: lemma restrict_extensional [simp]: "restrict f A \<in> extensional A"
nipkow@31754: by (simp add: restrict_def extensional_def)
paulson@14853: 
paulson@14853: lemma compose_extensional [simp]: "compose A f g \<in> extensional A"
nipkow@31754: by (simp add: compose_def)
paulson@14853: 
paulson@14853: lemma extensionalityI:
nipkow@31754:   "[| f \<in> extensional A; g \<in> extensional A;
paulson@14853:       !!x. x\<in>A ==> f x = g x |] ==> f = g"
nipkow@39302: by (force simp add: fun_eq_iff extensional_def)
paulson@14853: 
nipkow@39595: lemma extensional_restrict:  "f \<in> extensional A \<Longrightarrow> restrict f A = f"
nipkow@39595: by(rule extensionalityI[OF restrict_extensional]) auto
nipkow@39595: 
nipkow@33057: lemma inv_into_funcset: "f ` A = B ==> (\<lambda>x\<in>B. inv_into A f x) : B -> A"
nipkow@33057: by (unfold inv_into_def) (fast intro: someI2)
paulson@14853: 
nipkow@33057: lemma compose_inv_into_id:
nipkow@33057:   "bij_betw f A B ==> compose A (\<lambda>y\<in>B. inv_into A f y) f = (\<lambda>x\<in>A. x)"
nipkow@31754: apply (simp add: bij_betw_def compose_def)
nipkow@31754: apply (rule restrict_ext, auto)
nipkow@31754: done
paulson@14853: 
nipkow@33057: lemma compose_id_inv_into:
nipkow@33057:   "f ` A = B ==> compose B f (\<lambda>y\<in>B. inv_into A f y) = (\<lambda>x\<in>B. x)"
nipkow@31754: apply (simp add: compose_def)
nipkow@31754: apply (rule restrict_ext)
nipkow@33057: apply (simp add: f_inv_into_f)
nipkow@31754: done
paulson@14853: 
paulson@14762: 
paulson@14745: subsection{*Cardinality*}
paulson@14745: 
paulson@14745: lemma card_inj: "[|f \<in> A\<rightarrow>B; inj_on f A; finite B|] ==> card(A) \<le> card(B)"
nipkow@31754: by (rule card_inj_on_le) auto
paulson@14745: 
paulson@14745: lemma card_bij:
nipkow@31754:   "[|f \<in> A\<rightarrow>B; inj_on f A;
nipkow@31754:      g \<in> B\<rightarrow>A; inj_on g B; finite A; finite B|] ==> card(A) = card(B)"
nipkow@31754: by (blast intro: card_inj order_antisym)
paulson@14745: 
bulwahn@40631: subsection {* Extensional Function Spaces *} 
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: definition extensional_funcset
bulwahn@40631: where "extensional_funcset S T = (S -> T) \<inter> (extensional S)"
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: lemma extensional_empty[simp]: "extensional {} = {%x. undefined}"
wenzelm@44382: unfolding extensional_def by auto
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: lemma extensional_funcset_empty_domain: "extensional_funcset {} T = {%x. undefined}"
bulwahn@40631: unfolding extensional_funcset_def by simp
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: lemma extensional_funcset_empty_range:
bulwahn@40631:   assumes "S \<noteq> {}"
bulwahn@40631:   shows "extensional_funcset S {} = {}"
bulwahn@40631: using assms unfolding extensional_funcset_def by auto
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: lemma extensional_funcset_arb:
bulwahn@40631:   assumes "f \<in> extensional_funcset S T" "x \<notin> S"
bulwahn@40631:   shows "f x = undefined"
bulwahn@40631: using assms
bulwahn@40631: unfolding extensional_funcset_def by auto (auto dest!: extensional_arb)
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: lemma extensional_funcset_mem: "f \<in> extensional_funcset S T \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> f x \<in> T"
bulwahn@40631: unfolding extensional_funcset_def by auto
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: lemma extensional_subset: "f : extensional A ==> A <= B ==> f : extensional B"
bulwahn@40631: unfolding extensional_def by auto
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: lemma extensional_funcset_extend_domainI: "\<lbrakk> y \<in> T; f \<in> extensional_funcset S T\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> f(x := y) \<in> extensional_funcset (insert x S) T"
bulwahn@40631: unfolding extensional_funcset_def extensional_def by auto
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: lemma extensional_funcset_restrict_domain:
bulwahn@40631:   "x \<notin> S \<Longrightarrow> f \<in> extensional_funcset (insert x S) T \<Longrightarrow> f(x := undefined) \<in> extensional_funcset S T"
bulwahn@40631: unfolding extensional_funcset_def extensional_def by auto
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: lemma extensional_funcset_extend_domain_eq:
bulwahn@40631:   assumes "x \<notin> S"
bulwahn@40631:   shows
bulwahn@40631:     "extensional_funcset (insert x S) T = (\<lambda>(y, g). g(x := y)) ` {(y, g). y \<in> T \<and> g \<in> extensional_funcset S T}"
bulwahn@40631:   using assms
bulwahn@40631: proof -
bulwahn@40631:   {
bulwahn@40631:     fix f
bulwahn@40631:     assume "f : extensional_funcset (insert x S) T"
bulwahn@40631:     from this assms have "f : (%(y, g). g(x := y)) ` (T <*> extensional_funcset S T)"
bulwahn@40631:       unfolding image_iff
bulwahn@40631:       apply (rule_tac x="(f x, f(x := undefined))" in bexI)
bulwahn@40631:     apply (auto intro: extensional_funcset_extend_domainI extensional_funcset_restrict_domain extensional_funcset_mem) done 
bulwahn@40631:   }
bulwahn@40631:   moreover
bulwahn@40631:   {
bulwahn@40631:     fix f
bulwahn@40631:     assume "f : (%(y, g). g(x := y)) ` (T <*> extensional_funcset S T)"
bulwahn@40631:     from this assms have "f : extensional_funcset (insert x S) T"
bulwahn@40631:       by (auto intro: extensional_funcset_extend_domainI)
bulwahn@40631:   }
bulwahn@40631:   ultimately show ?thesis by auto
bulwahn@40631: qed
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: lemma extensional_funcset_fun_upd_restricts_rangeI:  "\<forall> y \<in> S. f x \<noteq> f y ==> f : extensional_funcset (insert x S) T ==> f(x := undefined) : extensional_funcset S (T - {f x})"
bulwahn@40631: unfolding extensional_funcset_def extensional_def
bulwahn@40631: apply auto
bulwahn@40631: apply (case_tac "x = xa")
bulwahn@40631: apply auto done
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: lemma extensional_funcset_fun_upd_extends_rangeI:
bulwahn@40631:   assumes "a \<in> T" "f : extensional_funcset S (T - {a})"
bulwahn@40631:   shows "f(x := a) : extensional_funcset (insert x S) T"
bulwahn@40631:   using assms unfolding extensional_funcset_def extensional_def by auto
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: subsubsection {* Injective Extensional Function Spaces *}
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: lemma extensional_funcset_fun_upd_inj_onI:
bulwahn@40631:   assumes "f \<in> extensional_funcset S (T - {a})" "inj_on f S"
bulwahn@40631:   shows "inj_on (f(x := a)) S"
bulwahn@40631:   using assms unfolding extensional_funcset_def by (auto intro!: inj_on_fun_updI)
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: lemma extensional_funcset_extend_domain_inj_on_eq:
bulwahn@40631:   assumes "x \<notin> S"
bulwahn@40631:   shows"{f. f \<in> extensional_funcset (insert x S) T \<and> inj_on f (insert x S)} =
bulwahn@40631:     (%(y, g). g(x:=y)) ` {(y, g). y \<in> T \<and> g \<in> extensional_funcset S (T - {y}) \<and> inj_on g S}"
bulwahn@40631: proof -
bulwahn@40631:   from assms show ?thesis
bulwahn@40631:     apply auto
bulwahn@40631:     apply (auto intro: extensional_funcset_fun_upd_inj_onI extensional_funcset_fun_upd_extends_rangeI)
bulwahn@40631:     apply (auto simp add: image_iff inj_on_def)
bulwahn@40631:     apply (rule_tac x="xa x" in exI)
bulwahn@40631:     apply (auto intro: extensional_funcset_mem)
bulwahn@40631:     apply (rule_tac x="xa(x := undefined)" in exI)
bulwahn@40631:     apply (auto intro!: extensional_funcset_fun_upd_restricts_rangeI)
bulwahn@40631:     apply (auto dest!: extensional_funcset_mem split: split_if_asm)
bulwahn@40631:     done
bulwahn@40631: qed
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: lemma extensional_funcset_extend_domain_inj_onI:
bulwahn@40631:   assumes "x \<notin> S"
bulwahn@40631:   shows "inj_on (\<lambda>(y, g). g(x := y)) {(y, g). y \<in> T \<and> g \<in> extensional_funcset S (T - {y}) \<and> inj_on g S}"
bulwahn@40631: proof -
bulwahn@40631:   from assms show ?thesis
bulwahn@40631:     apply (auto intro!: inj_onI)
bulwahn@40631:     apply (metis fun_upd_same)
bulwahn@40631:     by (metis assms extensional_funcset_arb fun_upd_triv fun_upd_upd)
bulwahn@40631: qed
bulwahn@40631:   
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: subsubsection {* Cardinality *}
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: lemma card_extensional_funcset:
bulwahn@40631:   assumes "finite S"
bulwahn@40631:   shows "card (extensional_funcset S T) = (card T) ^ (card S)"
bulwahn@40631: using assms
bulwahn@40631: proof (induct rule: finite_induct)
bulwahn@40631:   case empty
bulwahn@40631:   show ?case
bulwahn@40631:     by (auto simp add: extensional_funcset_empty_domain)
bulwahn@40631: next
bulwahn@40631:   case (insert x S)
bulwahn@40631:   {
bulwahn@40631:     fix g g' y y'
bulwahn@40631:     assume assms: "g \<in> extensional_funcset S T"
bulwahn@40631:       "g' \<in> extensional_funcset S T"
bulwahn@40631:       "y \<in> T" "y' \<in> T"
bulwahn@40631:       "g(x := y) = g'(x := y')"
bulwahn@40631:     from this have "y = y'"
bulwahn@40631:       by (metis fun_upd_same)
bulwahn@40631:     have "g = g'"
bulwahn@40631:       by (metis assms(1) assms(2) assms(5) extensional_funcset_arb fun_upd_triv fun_upd_upd insert(2))
bulwahn@40631:   from `y = y'` `g = g'` have "y = y' & g = g'" by simp
bulwahn@40631:   }
bulwahn@40631:   from this have "inj_on (\<lambda>(y, g). g (x := y)) (T \<times> extensional_funcset S T)"
bulwahn@40631:     by (auto intro: inj_onI)
bulwahn@40631:   from this insert.hyps show ?case
bulwahn@40631:     by (simp add: extensional_funcset_extend_domain_eq card_image card_cartesian_product)
bulwahn@40631: qed
bulwahn@40631: 
bulwahn@40631: lemma finite_extensional_funcset:
bulwahn@40631:   assumes "finite S" "finite T"
bulwahn@40631:   shows "finite (extensional_funcset S T)"
bulwahn@40631: proof -
bulwahn@40631:   from card_extensional_funcset[OF assms(1), of T] assms(2)
bulwahn@40631:   have "(card (extensional_funcset S T) \<noteq> 0) \<or> (S \<noteq> {} \<and> T = {})"
bulwahn@40631:     by auto
bulwahn@40631:   from this show ?thesis
bulwahn@40631:   proof
bulwahn@40631:     assume "card (extensional_funcset S T) \<noteq> 0"
bulwahn@40631:     from this show ?thesis
bulwahn@40631:       by (auto intro: card_ge_0_finite)
bulwahn@40631:   next
bulwahn@40631:     assume "S \<noteq> {} \<and> T = {}"
bulwahn@40631:     from this show ?thesis
bulwahn@40631:       by (auto simp add: extensional_funcset_empty_range)
bulwahn@40631:   qed
bulwahn@40631: qed
bulwahn@40631: 
paulson@13586: end




