
hoelzl@60036: (*  Title:      HOL/Filter.thy
hoelzl@60036:     Author:     Brian Huffman
hoelzl@60036:     Author:     Johannes Hölzl
hoelzl@60036: *)
hoelzl@60036: 
wenzelm@60758: section \<open>Filters on predicates\<close>
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: theory Filter
hoelzl@60036: imports Set_Interval Lifting_Set
hoelzl@60036: begin
hoelzl@60036: 
wenzelm@60758: subsection \<open>Filters\<close>
hoelzl@60036: 
wenzelm@60758: text \<open>
hoelzl@60036:   This definition also allows non-proper filters.
wenzelm@60758: \<close>
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: locale is_filter =
hoelzl@60036:   fixes F :: "('a \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> bool"
hoelzl@60036:   assumes True: "F (\<lambda>x. True)"
hoelzl@60036:   assumes conj: "F (\<lambda>x. P x) \<Longrightarrow> F (\<lambda>x. Q x) \<Longrightarrow> F (\<lambda>x. P x \<and> Q x)"
hoelzl@60036:   assumes mono: "\<forall>x. P x \<longrightarrow> Q x \<Longrightarrow> F (\<lambda>x. P x) \<Longrightarrow> F (\<lambda>x. Q x)"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: typedef 'a filter = "{F :: ('a \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> bool. is_filter F}"
hoelzl@60036: proof
hoelzl@60036:   show "(\<lambda>x. True) \<in> ?filter" by (auto intro: is_filter.intro)
hoelzl@60036: qed
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma is_filter_Rep_filter: "is_filter (Rep_filter F)"
hoelzl@60036:   using Rep_filter [of F] by simp
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma Abs_filter_inverse':
hoelzl@60036:   assumes "is_filter F" shows "Rep_filter (Abs_filter F) = F"
hoelzl@60036:   using assms by (simp add: Abs_filter_inverse)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: 
wenzelm@60758: subsubsection \<open>Eventually\<close>
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: definition eventually :: "('a \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> 'a filter \<Rightarrow> bool"
hoelzl@60036:   where "eventually P F \<longleftrightarrow> Rep_filter F P"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60037: syntax (xsymbols)
hoelzl@60038:   "_eventually"  :: "pttrn => 'a filter => bool => bool"      ("(3\<forall>\<^sub>F _ in _./ _)" [0, 0, 10] 10)
hoelzl@60037: 
hoelzl@60037: translations
hoelzl@60038:   "\<forall>\<^sub>Fx in F. P" == "CONST eventually (\<lambda>x. P) F"
hoelzl@60037: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_Abs_filter:
hoelzl@60036:   assumes "is_filter F" shows "eventually P (Abs_filter F) = F P"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding eventually_def using assms by (simp add: Abs_filter_inverse)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filter_eq_iff:
hoelzl@60036:   shows "F = F' \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>P. eventually P F = eventually P F')"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding Rep_filter_inject [symmetric] fun_eq_iff eventually_def ..
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_True [simp]: "eventually (\<lambda>x. True) F"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding eventually_def
hoelzl@60036:   by (rule is_filter.True [OF is_filter_Rep_filter])
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma always_eventually: "\<forall>x. P x \<Longrightarrow> eventually P F"
hoelzl@60036: proof -
hoelzl@60036:   assume "\<forall>x. P x" hence "P = (\<lambda>x. True)" by (simp add: ext)
hoelzl@60036:   thus "eventually P F" by simp
hoelzl@60036: qed
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma eventuallyI: "(\<And>x. P x) \<Longrightarrow> eventually P F"
hoelzl@60040:   by (auto intro: always_eventually)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_mono:
lp15@61806:   "\<lbrakk>eventually P F; \<And>x. P x \<Longrightarrow> Q x\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> eventually Q F"
lp15@61806:   unfolding eventually_def
lp15@61806:   by (blast intro: is_filter.mono [OF is_filter_Rep_filter])
lp15@61806: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_conj:
hoelzl@60036:   assumes P: "eventually (\<lambda>x. P x) F"
hoelzl@60036:   assumes Q: "eventually (\<lambda>x. Q x) F"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "eventually (\<lambda>x. P x \<and> Q x) F"
hoelzl@60036:   using assms unfolding eventually_def
hoelzl@60036:   by (rule is_filter.conj [OF is_filter_Rep_filter])
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_mp:
hoelzl@60036:   assumes "eventually (\<lambda>x. P x \<longrightarrow> Q x) F"
hoelzl@60036:   assumes "eventually (\<lambda>x. P x) F"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "eventually (\<lambda>x. Q x) F"
lp15@61806: proof -
lp15@61806:   have "eventually (\<lambda>x. (P x \<longrightarrow> Q x) \<and> P x) F"
hoelzl@60036:     using assms by (rule eventually_conj)
lp15@61806:   then show ?thesis
lp15@61810:     by (blast intro: eventually_mono)
hoelzl@60036: qed
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_rev_mp:
hoelzl@60036:   assumes "eventually (\<lambda>x. P x) F"
hoelzl@60036:   assumes "eventually (\<lambda>x. P x \<longrightarrow> Q x) F"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "eventually (\<lambda>x. Q x) F"
hoelzl@60036: using assms(2) assms(1) by (rule eventually_mp)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_conj_iff:
hoelzl@60036:   "eventually (\<lambda>x. P x \<and> Q x) F \<longleftrightarrow> eventually P F \<and> eventually Q F"
hoelzl@60036:   by (auto intro: eventually_conj elim: eventually_rev_mp)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_elim2:
hoelzl@60036:   assumes "eventually (\<lambda>i. P i) F"
hoelzl@60036:   assumes "eventually (\<lambda>i. Q i) F"
hoelzl@60036:   assumes "\<And>i. P i \<Longrightarrow> Q i \<Longrightarrow> R i"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "eventually (\<lambda>i. R i) F"
hoelzl@60036:   using assms by (auto elim!: eventually_rev_mp)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma eventually_ball_finite_distrib:
hoelzl@60040:   "finite A \<Longrightarrow> (eventually (\<lambda>x. \<forall>y\<in>A. P x y) net) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>y\<in>A. eventually (\<lambda>x. P x y) net)"
hoelzl@60040:   by (induction A rule: finite_induct) (auto simp: eventually_conj_iff)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma eventually_ball_finite:
hoelzl@60040:   "finite A \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>y\<in>A. eventually (\<lambda>x. P x y) net \<Longrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>x. \<forall>y\<in>A. P x y) net"
hoelzl@60040:   by (auto simp: eventually_ball_finite_distrib)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma eventually_all_finite:
hoelzl@60040:   fixes P :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b::finite \<Rightarrow> bool"
hoelzl@60040:   assumes "\<And>y. eventually (\<lambda>x. P x y) net"
hoelzl@60040:   shows "eventually (\<lambda>x. \<forall>y. P x y) net"
hoelzl@60040: using eventually_ball_finite [of UNIV P] assms by simp
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma eventually_ex: "(\<forall>\<^sub>Fx in F. \<exists>y. P x y) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>Y. \<forall>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x (Y x))"
hoelzl@60040: proof
hoelzl@60040:   assume "\<forall>\<^sub>Fx in F. \<exists>y. P x y"
hoelzl@60040:   then have "\<forall>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x (SOME y. P x y)"
lp15@61810:     by (auto intro: someI_ex eventually_mono)
hoelzl@60040:   then show "\<exists>Y. \<forall>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x (Y x)"
hoelzl@60040:     by auto
lp15@61810: qed (auto intro: eventually_mono)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma not_eventually_impI: "eventually P F \<Longrightarrow> \<not> eventually Q F \<Longrightarrow> \<not> eventually (\<lambda>x. P x \<longrightarrow> Q x) F"
hoelzl@60036:   by (auto intro: eventually_mp)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma not_eventuallyD: "\<not> eventually P F \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>x. \<not> P x"
hoelzl@60036:   by (metis always_eventually)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_subst:
hoelzl@60036:   assumes "eventually (\<lambda>n. P n = Q n) F"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "eventually P F = eventually Q F" (is "?L = ?R")
hoelzl@60036: proof -
hoelzl@60036:   from assms have "eventually (\<lambda>x. P x \<longrightarrow> Q x) F"
hoelzl@60036:       and "eventually (\<lambda>x. Q x \<longrightarrow> P x) F"
lp15@61810:     by (auto elim: eventually_mono)
hoelzl@60036:   then show ?thesis by (auto elim: eventually_elim2)
hoelzl@60036: qed
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60040: subsection \<open> Frequently as dual to eventually \<close>
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: definition frequently :: "('a \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> 'a filter \<Rightarrow> bool"
hoelzl@60040:   where "frequently P F \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> eventually (\<lambda>x. \<not> P x) F"
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: syntax (xsymbols)
hoelzl@60040:   "_frequently"  :: "pttrn \<Rightarrow> 'a filter \<Rightarrow> bool \<Rightarrow> bool"      ("(3\<exists>\<^sub>F _ in _./ _)" [0, 0, 10] 10)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: translations
hoelzl@60040:   "\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. P" == "CONST frequently (\<lambda>x. P) F"
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma not_frequently_False [simp]: "\<not> (\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. False)"
hoelzl@60040:   by (simp add: frequently_def)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma frequently_ex: "\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>x. P x"
hoelzl@60040:   by (auto simp: frequently_def dest: not_eventuallyD)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma frequentlyE: assumes "frequently P F" obtains x where "P x"
hoelzl@60040:   using frequently_ex[OF assms] by auto
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma frequently_mp:
hoelzl@60040:   assumes ev: "\<forall>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x \<longrightarrow> Q x" and P: "\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x" shows "\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. Q x"
lp15@61806: proof -
hoelzl@60040:   from ev have "eventually (\<lambda>x. \<not> Q x \<longrightarrow> \<not> P x) F"
hoelzl@60040:     by (rule eventually_rev_mp) (auto intro!: always_eventually)
hoelzl@60040:   from eventually_mp[OF this] P show ?thesis
hoelzl@60040:     by (auto simp: frequently_def)
hoelzl@60040: qed
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma frequently_rev_mp:
hoelzl@60040:   assumes "\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x"
hoelzl@60040:   assumes "\<forall>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x \<longrightarrow> Q x"
hoelzl@60040:   shows "\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. Q x"
hoelzl@60040: using assms(2) assms(1) by (rule frequently_mp)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma frequently_mono: "(\<forall>x. P x \<longrightarrow> Q x) \<Longrightarrow> frequently P F \<Longrightarrow> frequently Q F"
hoelzl@60040:   using frequently_mp[of P Q] by (simp add: always_eventually)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma frequently_elim1: "\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>i. P i \<Longrightarrow> Q i) \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. Q x"
hoelzl@60040:   by (metis frequently_mono)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma frequently_disj_iff: "(\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x \<or> Q x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x) \<or> (\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. Q x)"
hoelzl@60040:   by (simp add: frequently_def eventually_conj_iff)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma frequently_disj: "\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. Q x \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x \<or> Q x"
hoelzl@60040:   by (simp add: frequently_disj_iff)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma frequently_bex_finite_distrib:
hoelzl@60040:   assumes "finite A" shows "(\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. \<exists>y\<in>A. P x y) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>y\<in>A. \<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x y)"
hoelzl@60040:   using assms by induction (auto simp: frequently_disj_iff)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma frequently_bex_finite: "finite A \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. \<exists>y\<in>A. P x y \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>y\<in>A. \<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x y"
hoelzl@60040:   by (simp add: frequently_bex_finite_distrib)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma frequently_all: "(\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. \<forall>y. P x y) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>Y. \<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x (Y x))"
hoelzl@60040:   using eventually_ex[of "\<lambda>x y. \<not> P x y" F] by (simp add: frequently_def)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma
hoelzl@60040:   shows not_eventually: "\<not> eventually P F \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. \<not> P x)"
hoelzl@60040:     and not_frequently: "\<not> frequently P F \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>\<^sub>Fx in F. \<not> P x)"
hoelzl@60040:   by (auto simp: frequently_def)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma frequently_imp_iff:
hoelzl@60040:   "(\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x \<longrightarrow> Q x) \<longleftrightarrow> (eventually P F \<longrightarrow> frequently Q F)"
hoelzl@60040:   unfolding imp_conv_disj frequently_disj_iff not_eventually[symmetric] ..
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma eventually_frequently_const_simps:
hoelzl@60040:   "(\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x \<and> C) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x) \<and> C"
hoelzl@60040:   "(\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. C \<and> P x) \<longleftrightarrow> C \<and> (\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x)"
hoelzl@60040:   "(\<forall>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x \<or> C) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x) \<or> C"
hoelzl@60040:   "(\<forall>\<^sub>Fx in F. C \<or> P x) \<longleftrightarrow> C \<or> (\<forall>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x)"
hoelzl@60040:   "(\<forall>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x \<longrightarrow> C) \<longleftrightarrow> ((\<exists>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x) \<longrightarrow> C)"
hoelzl@60040:   "(\<forall>\<^sub>Fx in F. C \<longrightarrow> P x) \<longleftrightarrow> (C \<longrightarrow> (\<forall>\<^sub>Fx in F. P x))"
hoelzl@60040:   by (cases C; simp add: not_frequently)+
hoelzl@60040: 
lp15@61806: lemmas eventually_frequently_simps =
hoelzl@60040:   eventually_frequently_const_simps
hoelzl@60040:   not_eventually
hoelzl@60040:   eventually_conj_iff
hoelzl@60040:   eventually_ball_finite_distrib
hoelzl@60040:   eventually_ex
hoelzl@60040:   not_frequently
hoelzl@60040:   frequently_disj_iff
hoelzl@60040:   frequently_bex_finite_distrib
hoelzl@60040:   frequently_all
hoelzl@60040:   frequently_imp_iff
hoelzl@60040: 
wenzelm@60758: ML \<open>
hoelzl@60036:   fun eventually_elim_tac ctxt facts = SUBGOAL_CASES (fn (goal, i) =>
hoelzl@60036:     let
hoelzl@60036:       val mp_thms = facts RL @{thms eventually_rev_mp}
hoelzl@60036:       val raw_elim_thm =
hoelzl@60036:         (@{thm allI} RS @{thm always_eventually})
hoelzl@60036:         |> fold (fn thm1 => fn thm2 => thm2 RS thm1) mp_thms
hoelzl@60036:         |> fold (fn _ => fn thm => @{thm impI} RS thm) facts
wenzelm@60589:       val cases_prop =
wenzelm@60589:         Thm.prop_of
wenzelm@60589:           (Rule_Cases.internalize_params (raw_elim_thm RS Goal.init (Thm.cterm_of ctxt goal)))
hoelzl@60036:       val cases = Rule_Cases.make_common ctxt cases_prop [(("elim", []), [])]
hoelzl@60036:     in
wenzelm@60752:       CASES cases (resolve_tac ctxt [raw_elim_thm] i)
hoelzl@60036:     end)
wenzelm@60758: \<close>
hoelzl@60036: 
wenzelm@60758: method_setup eventually_elim = \<open>
hoelzl@60036:   Scan.succeed (fn ctxt => METHOD_CASES (HEADGOAL o eventually_elim_tac ctxt))
wenzelm@60758: \<close> "elimination of eventually quantifiers"
hoelzl@60036: 
wenzelm@60758: subsubsection \<open>Finer-than relation\<close>
hoelzl@60036: 
wenzelm@60758: text \<open>@{term "F \<le> F'"} means that filter @{term F} is finer than
wenzelm@60758: filter @{term F'}.\<close>
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: instantiation filter :: (type) complete_lattice
hoelzl@60036: begin
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: definition le_filter_def:
hoelzl@60036:   "F \<le> F' \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>P. eventually P F' \<longrightarrow> eventually P F)"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: definition
hoelzl@60036:   "(F :: 'a filter) < F' \<longleftrightarrow> F \<le> F' \<and> \<not> F' \<le> F"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: definition
hoelzl@60036:   "top = Abs_filter (\<lambda>P. \<forall>x. P x)"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: definition
hoelzl@60036:   "bot = Abs_filter (\<lambda>P. True)"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: definition
hoelzl@60036:   "sup F F' = Abs_filter (\<lambda>P. eventually P F \<and> eventually P F')"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: definition
hoelzl@60036:   "inf F F' = Abs_filter
hoelzl@60036:       (\<lambda>P. \<exists>Q R. eventually Q F \<and> eventually R F' \<and> (\<forall>x. Q x \<and> R x \<longrightarrow> P x))"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: definition
hoelzl@60036:   "Sup S = Abs_filter (\<lambda>P. \<forall>F\<in>S. eventually P F)"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: definition
hoelzl@60036:   "Inf S = Sup {F::'a filter. \<forall>F'\<in>S. F \<le> F'}"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_top [simp]: "eventually P top \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. P x)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding top_filter_def
hoelzl@60036:   by (rule eventually_Abs_filter, rule is_filter.intro, auto)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_bot [simp]: "eventually P bot"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding bot_filter_def
hoelzl@60036:   by (subst eventually_Abs_filter, rule is_filter.intro, auto)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_sup:
hoelzl@60036:   "eventually P (sup F F') \<longleftrightarrow> eventually P F \<and> eventually P F'"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding sup_filter_def
hoelzl@60036:   by (rule eventually_Abs_filter, rule is_filter.intro)
hoelzl@60036:      (auto elim!: eventually_rev_mp)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_inf:
hoelzl@60036:   "eventually P (inf F F') \<longleftrightarrow>
hoelzl@60036:    (\<exists>Q R. eventually Q F \<and> eventually R F' \<and> (\<forall>x. Q x \<and> R x \<longrightarrow> P x))"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding inf_filter_def
hoelzl@60036:   apply (rule eventually_Abs_filter, rule is_filter.intro)
hoelzl@60036:   apply (fast intro: eventually_True)
hoelzl@60036:   apply clarify
hoelzl@60036:   apply (intro exI conjI)
hoelzl@60036:   apply (erule (1) eventually_conj)
hoelzl@60036:   apply (erule (1) eventually_conj)
hoelzl@60036:   apply simp
hoelzl@60036:   apply auto
hoelzl@60036:   done
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_Sup:
hoelzl@60036:   "eventually P (Sup S) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>F\<in>S. eventually P F)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding Sup_filter_def
hoelzl@60036:   apply (rule eventually_Abs_filter, rule is_filter.intro)
hoelzl@60036:   apply (auto intro: eventually_conj elim!: eventually_rev_mp)
hoelzl@60036:   done
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: instance proof
hoelzl@60036:   fix F F' F'' :: "'a filter" and S :: "'a filter set"
hoelzl@60036:   { show "F < F' \<longleftrightarrow> F \<le> F' \<and> \<not> F' \<le> F"
hoelzl@60036:     by (rule less_filter_def) }
hoelzl@60036:   { show "F \<le> F"
hoelzl@60036:     unfolding le_filter_def by simp }
hoelzl@60036:   { assume "F \<le> F'" and "F' \<le> F''" thus "F \<le> F''"
hoelzl@60036:     unfolding le_filter_def by simp }
hoelzl@60036:   { assume "F \<le> F'" and "F' \<le> F" thus "F = F'"
hoelzl@60036:     unfolding le_filter_def filter_eq_iff by fast }
hoelzl@60036:   { show "inf F F' \<le> F" and "inf F F' \<le> F'"
hoelzl@60036:     unfolding le_filter_def eventually_inf by (auto intro: eventually_True) }
hoelzl@60036:   { assume "F \<le> F'" and "F \<le> F''" thus "F \<le> inf F' F''"
hoelzl@60036:     unfolding le_filter_def eventually_inf
lp15@61810:     by (auto intro: eventually_mono [OF eventually_conj]) }
hoelzl@60036:   { show "F \<le> sup F F'" and "F' \<le> sup F F'"
hoelzl@60036:     unfolding le_filter_def eventually_sup by simp_all }
hoelzl@60036:   { assume "F \<le> F''" and "F' \<le> F''" thus "sup F F' \<le> F''"
hoelzl@60036:     unfolding le_filter_def eventually_sup by simp }
hoelzl@60036:   { assume "F'' \<in> S" thus "Inf S \<le> F''"
hoelzl@60036:     unfolding le_filter_def Inf_filter_def eventually_Sup Ball_def by simp }
hoelzl@60036:   { assume "\<And>F'. F' \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> F \<le> F'" thus "F \<le> Inf S"
hoelzl@60036:     unfolding le_filter_def Inf_filter_def eventually_Sup Ball_def by simp }
hoelzl@60036:   { assume "F \<in> S" thus "F \<le> Sup S"
hoelzl@60036:     unfolding le_filter_def eventually_Sup by simp }
hoelzl@60036:   { assume "\<And>F. F \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> F \<le> F'" thus "Sup S \<le> F'"
hoelzl@60036:     unfolding le_filter_def eventually_Sup by simp }
hoelzl@60036:   { show "Inf {} = (top::'a filter)"
hoelzl@60036:     by (auto simp: top_filter_def Inf_filter_def Sup_filter_def)
hoelzl@60036:       (metis (full_types) top_filter_def always_eventually eventually_top) }
hoelzl@60036:   { show "Sup {} = (bot::'a filter)"
hoelzl@60036:     by (auto simp: bot_filter_def Sup_filter_def) }
hoelzl@60036: qed
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: end
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filter_leD:
hoelzl@60036:   "F \<le> F' \<Longrightarrow> eventually P F' \<Longrightarrow> eventually P F"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding le_filter_def by simp
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filter_leI:
hoelzl@60036:   "(\<And>P. eventually P F' \<Longrightarrow> eventually P F) \<Longrightarrow> F \<le> F'"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding le_filter_def by simp
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_False:
hoelzl@60036:   "eventually (\<lambda>x. False) F \<longleftrightarrow> F = bot"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filter_eq_iff by (auto elim: eventually_rev_mp)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma eventually_frequently: "F \<noteq> bot \<Longrightarrow> eventually P F \<Longrightarrow> frequently P F"
hoelzl@60040:   using eventually_conj[of P F "\<lambda>x. \<not> P x"]
hoelzl@60040:   by (auto simp add: frequently_def eventually_False)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma eventually_const_iff: "eventually (\<lambda>x. P) F \<longleftrightarrow> P \<or> F = bot"
hoelzl@60040:   by (cases P) (auto simp: eventually_False)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma eventually_const[simp]: "F \<noteq> bot \<Longrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>x. P) F \<longleftrightarrow> P"
hoelzl@60040:   by (simp add: eventually_const_iff)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma frequently_const_iff: "frequently (\<lambda>x. P) F \<longleftrightarrow> P \<and> F \<noteq> bot"
hoelzl@60040:   by (simp add: frequently_def eventually_const_iff)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma frequently_const[simp]: "F \<noteq> bot \<Longrightarrow> frequently (\<lambda>x. P) F \<longleftrightarrow> P"
hoelzl@60040:   by (simp add: frequently_const_iff)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@61245: lemma eventually_happens: "eventually P net \<Longrightarrow> net = bot \<or> (\<exists>x. P x)"
hoelzl@61245:   by (metis frequentlyE eventually_frequently)
hoelzl@61245: 
eberlm@61531: lemma eventually_happens':
eberlm@61531:   assumes "F \<noteq> bot" "eventually P F"
eberlm@61531:   shows   "\<exists>x. P x"
eberlm@61531:   using assms eventually_frequently frequentlyE by blast
eberlm@61531: 
hoelzl@60036: abbreviation (input) trivial_limit :: "'a filter \<Rightarrow> bool"
hoelzl@60036:   where "trivial_limit F \<equiv> F = bot"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma trivial_limit_def: "trivial_limit F \<longleftrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>x. False) F"
hoelzl@60036:   by (rule eventually_False [symmetric])
hoelzl@60036: 
lp15@61806: lemma False_imp_not_eventually: "(\<forall>x. \<not> P x ) \<Longrightarrow> \<not> trivial_limit net \<Longrightarrow> \<not> eventually (\<lambda>x. P x) net"
lp15@61806:   by (simp add: eventually_False)
lp15@61806: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_Inf: "eventually P (Inf B) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>X\<subseteq>B. finite X \<and> eventually P (Inf X))"
hoelzl@60036: proof -
hoelzl@60036:   let ?F = "\<lambda>P. \<exists>X\<subseteq>B. finite X \<and> eventually P (Inf X)"
lp15@61806: 
hoelzl@60036:   { fix P have "eventually P (Abs_filter ?F) \<longleftrightarrow> ?F P"
hoelzl@60036:     proof (rule eventually_Abs_filter is_filter.intro)+
hoelzl@60036:       show "?F (\<lambda>x. True)"
hoelzl@60036:         by (rule exI[of _ "{}"]) (simp add: le_fun_def)
hoelzl@60036:     next
hoelzl@60036:       fix P Q
hoelzl@60036:       assume "?F P" then guess X ..
hoelzl@60036:       moreover
hoelzl@60036:       assume "?F Q" then guess Y ..
hoelzl@60036:       ultimately show "?F (\<lambda>x. P x \<and> Q x)"
hoelzl@60036:         by (intro exI[of _ "X \<union> Y"])
hoelzl@60036:            (auto simp: Inf_union_distrib eventually_inf)
hoelzl@60036:     next
hoelzl@60036:       fix P Q
hoelzl@60036:       assume "?F P" then guess X ..
hoelzl@60036:       moreover assume "\<forall>x. P x \<longrightarrow> Q x"
hoelzl@60036:       ultimately show "?F Q"
lp15@61810:         by (intro exI[of _ X]) (auto elim: eventually_mono)
hoelzl@60036:     qed }
hoelzl@60036:   note eventually_F = this
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036:   have "Inf B = Abs_filter ?F"
hoelzl@60036:   proof (intro antisym Inf_greatest)
hoelzl@60036:     show "Inf B \<le> Abs_filter ?F"
hoelzl@60036:       by (auto simp: le_filter_def eventually_F dest: Inf_superset_mono)
hoelzl@60036:   next
hoelzl@60036:     fix F assume "F \<in> B" then show "Abs_filter ?F \<le> F"
hoelzl@60036:       by (auto simp add: le_filter_def eventually_F intro!: exI[of _ "{F}"])
hoelzl@60036:   qed
hoelzl@60036:   then show ?thesis
hoelzl@60036:     by (simp add: eventually_F)
hoelzl@60036: qed
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_INF: "eventually P (INF b:B. F b) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>X\<subseteq>B. finite X \<and> eventually P (INF b:X. F b))"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding INF_def[of B] eventually_Inf[of P "F`B"]
hoelzl@60036:   by (metis Inf_image_eq finite_imageI image_mono finite_subset_image)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma Inf_filter_not_bot:
hoelzl@60036:   fixes B :: "'a filter set"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "(\<And>X. X \<subseteq> B \<Longrightarrow> finite X \<Longrightarrow> Inf X \<noteq> bot) \<Longrightarrow> Inf B \<noteq> bot"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding trivial_limit_def eventually_Inf[of _ B]
hoelzl@60036:     bot_bool_def [symmetric] bot_fun_def [symmetric] bot_unique by simp
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma INF_filter_not_bot:
hoelzl@60036:   fixes F :: "'i \<Rightarrow> 'a filter"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "(\<And>X. X \<subseteq> B \<Longrightarrow> finite X \<Longrightarrow> (INF b:X. F b) \<noteq> bot) \<Longrightarrow> (INF b:B. F b) \<noteq> bot"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding trivial_limit_def eventually_INF[of _ B]
hoelzl@60036:     bot_bool_def [symmetric] bot_fun_def [symmetric] bot_unique by simp
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_Inf_base:
hoelzl@60036:   assumes "B \<noteq> {}" and base: "\<And>F G. F \<in> B \<Longrightarrow> G \<in> B \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>x\<in>B. x \<le> inf F G"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "eventually P (Inf B) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>b\<in>B. eventually P b)"
hoelzl@60036: proof (subst eventually_Inf, safe)
hoelzl@60036:   fix X assume "finite X" "X \<subseteq> B"
hoelzl@60036:   then have "\<exists>b\<in>B. \<forall>x\<in>X. b \<le> x"
hoelzl@60036:   proof induct
hoelzl@60036:     case empty then show ?case
wenzelm@60758:       using \<open>B \<noteq> {}\<close> by auto
hoelzl@60036:   next
hoelzl@60036:     case (insert x X)
hoelzl@60036:     then obtain b where "b \<in> B" "\<And>x. x \<in> X \<Longrightarrow> b \<le> x"
hoelzl@60036:       by auto
wenzelm@60758:     with \<open>insert x X \<subseteq> B\<close> base[of b x] show ?case
hoelzl@60036:       by (auto intro: order_trans)
hoelzl@60036:   qed
hoelzl@60036:   then obtain b where "b \<in> B" "b \<le> Inf X"
hoelzl@60036:     by (auto simp: le_Inf_iff)
hoelzl@60036:   then show "eventually P (Inf X) \<Longrightarrow> Bex B (eventually P)"
hoelzl@60036:     by (intro bexI[of _ b]) (auto simp: le_filter_def)
hoelzl@60036: qed (auto intro!: exI[of _ "{x}" for x])
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_INF_base:
hoelzl@60036:   "B \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>a b. a \<in> B \<Longrightarrow> b \<in> B \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>x\<in>B. F x \<le> inf (F a) (F b)) \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@60036:     eventually P (INF b:B. F b) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>b\<in>B. eventually P (F b))"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding INF_def by (subst eventually_Inf_base) auto
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: 
wenzelm@60758: subsubsection \<open>Map function for filters\<close>
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: definition filtermap :: "('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) \<Rightarrow> 'a filter \<Rightarrow> 'b filter"
hoelzl@60036:   where "filtermap f F = Abs_filter (\<lambda>P. eventually (\<lambda>x. P (f x)) F)"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_filtermap:
hoelzl@60036:   "eventually P (filtermap f F) = eventually (\<lambda>x. P (f x)) F"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filtermap_def
hoelzl@60036:   apply (rule eventually_Abs_filter)
hoelzl@60036:   apply (rule is_filter.intro)
hoelzl@60036:   apply (auto elim!: eventually_rev_mp)
hoelzl@60036:   done
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filtermap_ident: "filtermap (\<lambda>x. x) F = F"
hoelzl@60036:   by (simp add: filter_eq_iff eventually_filtermap)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filtermap_filtermap:
hoelzl@60036:   "filtermap f (filtermap g F) = filtermap (\<lambda>x. f (g x)) F"
hoelzl@60036:   by (simp add: filter_eq_iff eventually_filtermap)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filtermap_mono: "F \<le> F' \<Longrightarrow> filtermap f F \<le> filtermap f F'"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding le_filter_def eventually_filtermap by simp
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filtermap_bot [simp]: "filtermap f bot = bot"
hoelzl@60036:   by (simp add: filter_eq_iff eventually_filtermap)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filtermap_sup: "filtermap f (sup F1 F2) = sup (filtermap f F1) (filtermap f F2)"
hoelzl@60036:   by (auto simp: filter_eq_iff eventually_filtermap eventually_sup)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filtermap_inf: "filtermap f (inf F1 F2) \<le> inf (filtermap f F1) (filtermap f F2)"
hoelzl@60036:   by (auto simp: le_filter_def eventually_filtermap eventually_inf)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filtermap_INF: "filtermap f (INF b:B. F b) \<le> (INF b:B. filtermap f (F b))"
hoelzl@60036: proof -
hoelzl@60036:   { fix X :: "'c set" assume "finite X"
hoelzl@60036:     then have "filtermap f (INFIMUM X F) \<le> (INF b:X. filtermap f (F b))"
hoelzl@60036:     proof induct
hoelzl@60036:       case (insert x X)
hoelzl@60036:       have "filtermap f (INF a:insert x X. F a) \<le> inf (filtermap f (F x)) (filtermap f (INF a:X. F a))"
hoelzl@60036:         by (rule order_trans[OF _ filtermap_inf]) simp
hoelzl@60036:       also have "\<dots> \<le> inf (filtermap f (F x)) (INF a:X. filtermap f (F a))"
hoelzl@60036:         by (intro inf_mono insert order_refl)
hoelzl@60036:       finally show ?case
hoelzl@60036:         by simp
hoelzl@60036:     qed simp }
hoelzl@60036:   then show ?thesis
hoelzl@60036:     unfolding le_filter_def eventually_filtermap
hoelzl@60036:     by (subst (1 2) eventually_INF) auto
hoelzl@60036: qed
wenzelm@60758: subsubsection \<open>Standard filters\<close>
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: definition principal :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> 'a filter" where
hoelzl@60036:   "principal S = Abs_filter (\<lambda>P. \<forall>x\<in>S. P x)"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_principal: "eventually P (principal S) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x\<in>S. P x)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding principal_def
hoelzl@60036:   by (rule eventually_Abs_filter, rule is_filter.intro) auto
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_inf_principal: "eventually P (inf F (principal s)) \<longleftrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> s \<longrightarrow> P x) F"
lp15@61810:   unfolding eventually_inf eventually_principal by (auto elim: eventually_mono)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma principal_UNIV[simp]: "principal UNIV = top"
hoelzl@60036:   by (auto simp: filter_eq_iff eventually_principal)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma principal_empty[simp]: "principal {} = bot"
hoelzl@60036:   by (auto simp: filter_eq_iff eventually_principal)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma principal_eq_bot_iff: "principal X = bot \<longleftrightarrow> X = {}"
hoelzl@60036:   by (auto simp add: filter_eq_iff eventually_principal)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma principal_le_iff[iff]: "principal A \<le> principal B \<longleftrightarrow> A \<subseteq> B"
hoelzl@60036:   by (auto simp: le_filter_def eventually_principal)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma le_principal: "F \<le> principal A \<longleftrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<in> A) F"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding le_filter_def eventually_principal
hoelzl@60036:   apply safe
hoelzl@60036:   apply (erule_tac x="\<lambda>x. x \<in> A" in allE)
lp15@61810:   apply (auto elim: eventually_mono)
hoelzl@60036:   done
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma principal_inject[iff]: "principal A = principal B \<longleftrightarrow> A = B"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding eq_iff by simp
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma sup_principal[simp]: "sup (principal A) (principal B) = principal (A \<union> B)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filter_eq_iff eventually_sup eventually_principal by auto
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma inf_principal[simp]: "inf (principal A) (principal B) = principal (A \<inter> B)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filter_eq_iff eventually_inf eventually_principal
hoelzl@60036:   by (auto intro: exI[of _ "\<lambda>x. x \<in> A"] exI[of _ "\<lambda>x. x \<in> B"])
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma SUP_principal[simp]: "(SUP i : I. principal (A i)) = principal (\<Union>i\<in>I. A i)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filter_eq_iff eventually_Sup SUP_def by (auto simp: eventually_principal)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma INF_principal_finite: "finite X \<Longrightarrow> (INF x:X. principal (f x)) = principal (\<Inter>x\<in>X. f x)"
hoelzl@60036:   by (induct X rule: finite_induct) auto
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filtermap_principal[simp]: "filtermap f (principal A) = principal (f ` A)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filter_eq_iff eventually_filtermap eventually_principal by simp
hoelzl@60036: 
wenzelm@60758: subsubsection \<open>Order filters\<close>
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: definition at_top :: "('a::order) filter"
hoelzl@60036:   where "at_top = (INF k. principal {k ..})"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma at_top_sub: "at_top = (INF k:{c::'a::linorder..}. principal {k ..})"
hoelzl@60036:   by (auto intro!: INF_eq max.cobounded1 max.cobounded2 simp: at_top_def)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_at_top_linorder: "eventually P at_top \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>N::'a::linorder. \<forall>n\<ge>N. P n)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding at_top_def
hoelzl@60036:   by (subst eventually_INF_base) (auto simp: eventually_principal intro: max.cobounded1 max.cobounded2)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_ge_at_top:
hoelzl@60036:   "eventually (\<lambda>x. (c::_::linorder) \<le> x) at_top"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding eventually_at_top_linorder by auto
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_at_top_dense: "eventually P at_top \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>N::'a::{no_top, linorder}. \<forall>n>N. P n)"
hoelzl@60036: proof -
hoelzl@60036:   have "eventually P (INF k. principal {k <..}) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>N::'a. \<forall>n>N. P n)"
hoelzl@60036:     by (subst eventually_INF_base) (auto simp: eventually_principal intro: max.cobounded1 max.cobounded2)
hoelzl@60036:   also have "(INF k. principal {k::'a <..}) = at_top"
lp15@61806:     unfolding at_top_def
hoelzl@60036:     by (intro INF_eq) (auto intro: less_imp_le simp: Ici_subset_Ioi_iff gt_ex)
hoelzl@60036:   finally show ?thesis .
hoelzl@60036: qed
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60721: lemma eventually_at_top_not_equal: "eventually (\<lambda>x::'a::{no_top, linorder}. x \<noteq> c) at_top"
hoelzl@60721:   unfolding eventually_at_top_dense by auto
hoelzl@60721: 
hoelzl@60721: lemma eventually_gt_at_top: "eventually (\<lambda>x. (c::_::{no_top, linorder}) < x) at_top"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding eventually_at_top_dense by auto
hoelzl@60036: 
eberlm@61531: lemma eventually_all_ge_at_top:
eberlm@61531:   assumes "eventually P (at_top :: ('a :: linorder) filter)"
eberlm@61531:   shows   "eventually (\<lambda>x. \<forall>y\<ge>x. P y) at_top"
eberlm@61531: proof -
eberlm@61531:   from assms obtain x where "\<And>y. y \<ge> x \<Longrightarrow> P y" by (auto simp: eventually_at_top_linorder)
eberlm@61531:   hence "\<forall>z\<ge>y. P z" if "y \<ge> x" for y using that by simp
eberlm@61531:   thus ?thesis by (auto simp: eventually_at_top_linorder)
eberlm@61531: qed
eberlm@61531: 
hoelzl@60036: definition at_bot :: "('a::order) filter"
hoelzl@60036:   where "at_bot = (INF k. principal {.. k})"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma at_bot_sub: "at_bot = (INF k:{.. c::'a::linorder}. principal {.. k})"
hoelzl@60036:   by (auto intro!: INF_eq min.cobounded1 min.cobounded2 simp: at_bot_def)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_at_bot_linorder:
hoelzl@60036:   fixes P :: "'a::linorder \<Rightarrow> bool" shows "eventually P at_bot \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<le>N. P n)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding at_bot_def
hoelzl@60036:   by (subst eventually_INF_base) (auto simp: eventually_principal intro: min.cobounded1 min.cobounded2)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_le_at_bot:
hoelzl@60036:   "eventually (\<lambda>x. x \<le> (c::_::linorder)) at_bot"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding eventually_at_bot_linorder by auto
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_at_bot_dense: "eventually P at_bot \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>N::'a::{no_bot, linorder}. \<forall>n<N. P n)"
hoelzl@60036: proof -
hoelzl@60036:   have "eventually P (INF k. principal {..< k}) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>N::'a. \<forall>n<N. P n)"
hoelzl@60036:     by (subst eventually_INF_base) (auto simp: eventually_principal intro: min.cobounded1 min.cobounded2)
hoelzl@60036:   also have "(INF k. principal {..< k::'a}) = at_bot"
lp15@61806:     unfolding at_bot_def
hoelzl@60036:     by (intro INF_eq) (auto intro: less_imp_le simp: Iic_subset_Iio_iff lt_ex)
hoelzl@60036:   finally show ?thesis .
hoelzl@60036: qed
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60721: lemma eventually_at_bot_not_equal: "eventually (\<lambda>x::'a::{no_bot, linorder}. x \<noteq> c) at_bot"
hoelzl@60721:   unfolding eventually_at_bot_dense by auto
hoelzl@60721: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_gt_at_bot:
hoelzl@60036:   "eventually (\<lambda>x. x < (c::_::unbounded_dense_linorder)) at_bot"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding eventually_at_bot_dense by auto
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma trivial_limit_at_bot_linorder: "\<not> trivial_limit (at_bot ::('a::linorder) filter)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding trivial_limit_def
hoelzl@60036:   by (metis eventually_at_bot_linorder order_refl)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma trivial_limit_at_top_linorder: "\<not> trivial_limit (at_top ::('a::linorder) filter)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding trivial_limit_def
hoelzl@60036:   by (metis eventually_at_top_linorder order_refl)
hoelzl@60036: 
wenzelm@60758: subsection \<open>Sequentially\<close>
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: abbreviation sequentially :: "nat filter"
hoelzl@60036:   where "sequentially \<equiv> at_top"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_sequentially:
hoelzl@60036:   "eventually P sequentially \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. P n)"
hoelzl@60036:   by (rule eventually_at_top_linorder)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma sequentially_bot [simp, intro]: "sequentially \<noteq> bot"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filter_eq_iff eventually_sequentially by auto
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemmas trivial_limit_sequentially = sequentially_bot
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_False_sequentially [simp]:
hoelzl@60036:   "\<not> eventually (\<lambda>n. False) sequentially"
hoelzl@60036:   by (simp add: eventually_False)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma le_sequentially:
hoelzl@60036:   "F \<le> sequentially \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>N. eventually (\<lambda>n. N \<le> n) F)"
hoelzl@60036:   by (simp add: at_top_def le_INF_iff le_principal)
hoelzl@60036: 
lp15@60974: lemma eventually_sequentiallyI [intro?]:
hoelzl@60036:   assumes "\<And>x. c \<le> x \<Longrightarrow> P x"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "eventually P sequentially"
hoelzl@60036: using assms by (auto simp: eventually_sequentially)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma eventually_sequentially_Suc: "eventually (\<lambda>i. P (Suc i)) sequentially \<longleftrightarrow> eventually P sequentially"
hoelzl@60040:   unfolding eventually_sequentially by (metis Suc_le_D Suc_le_mono le_Suc_eq)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma eventually_sequentially_seg: "eventually (\<lambda>n. P (n + k)) sequentially \<longleftrightarrow> eventually P sequentially"
hoelzl@60040:   using eventually_sequentially_Suc[of "\<lambda>n. P (n + k)" for k] by (induction k) auto
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60039: subsection \<open> The cofinite filter \<close>
hoelzl@60039: 
hoelzl@60039: definition "cofinite = Abs_filter (\<lambda>P. finite {x. \<not> P x})"
hoelzl@60039: 
hoelzl@60040: abbreviation Inf_many :: "('a \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> bool"  (binder "INFM " 10) where
hoelzl@60040:   "Inf_many P \<equiv> frequently P cofinite"
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: abbreviation Alm_all :: "('a \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> bool"  (binder "MOST " 10) where
hoelzl@60040:   "Alm_all P \<equiv> eventually P cofinite"
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60040: notation (xsymbols)
hoelzl@60040:   Inf_many  (binder "\<exists>\<^sub>\<infinity>" 10) and
hoelzl@60040:   Alm_all  (binder "\<forall>\<^sub>\<infinity>" 10)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60039: lemma eventually_cofinite: "eventually P cofinite \<longleftrightarrow> finite {x. \<not> P x}"
hoelzl@60039:   unfolding cofinite_def
hoelzl@60039: proof (rule eventually_Abs_filter, rule is_filter.intro)
hoelzl@60039:   fix P Q :: "'a \<Rightarrow> bool" assume "finite {x. \<not> P x}" "finite {x. \<not> Q x}"
hoelzl@60039:   from finite_UnI[OF this] show "finite {x. \<not> (P x \<and> Q x)}"
hoelzl@60039:     by (rule rev_finite_subset) auto
hoelzl@60039: next
hoelzl@60039:   fix P Q :: "'a \<Rightarrow> bool" assume P: "finite {x. \<not> P x}" and *: "\<forall>x. P x \<longrightarrow> Q x"
hoelzl@60039:   from * show "finite {x. \<not> Q x}"
hoelzl@60039:     by (intro finite_subset[OF _ P]) auto
hoelzl@60039: qed simp
hoelzl@60039: 
hoelzl@60040: lemma frequently_cofinite: "frequently P cofinite \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> finite {x. P x}"
hoelzl@60040:   by (simp add: frequently_def eventually_cofinite)
hoelzl@60040: 
hoelzl@60039: lemma cofinite_bot[simp]: "cofinite = (bot::'a filter) \<longleftrightarrow> finite (UNIV :: 'a set)"
hoelzl@60039:   unfolding trivial_limit_def eventually_cofinite by simp
hoelzl@60039: 
hoelzl@60039: lemma cofinite_eq_sequentially: "cofinite = sequentially"
hoelzl@60039:   unfolding filter_eq_iff eventually_sequentially eventually_cofinite
hoelzl@60039: proof safe
hoelzl@60039:   fix P :: "nat \<Rightarrow> bool" assume [simp]: "finite {x. \<not> P x}"
hoelzl@60039:   show "\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. P n"
hoelzl@60039:   proof cases
hoelzl@60039:     assume "{x. \<not> P x} \<noteq> {}" then show ?thesis
hoelzl@60039:       by (intro exI[of _ "Suc (Max {x. \<not> P x})"]) (auto simp: Suc_le_eq)
hoelzl@60039:   qed auto
hoelzl@60039: next
hoelzl@60039:   fix P :: "nat \<Rightarrow> bool" and N :: nat assume "\<forall>n\<ge>N. P n"
hoelzl@60039:   then have "{x. \<not> P x} \<subseteq> {..< N}"
hoelzl@60039:     by (auto simp: not_le)
hoelzl@60039:   then show "finite {x. \<not> P x}"
hoelzl@60039:     by (blast intro: finite_subset)
hoelzl@60039: qed
hoelzl@60036: 
wenzelm@60758: subsection \<open>Limits\<close>
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: definition filterlim :: "('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) \<Rightarrow> 'b filter \<Rightarrow> 'a filter \<Rightarrow> bool" where
hoelzl@60036:   "filterlim f F2 F1 \<longleftrightarrow> filtermap f F1 \<le> F2"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: syntax
hoelzl@60036:   "_LIM" :: "pttrns \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> bool" ("(3LIM (_)/ (_)./ (_) :> (_))" [1000, 10, 0, 10] 10)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: translations
hoelzl@60036:   "LIM x F1. f :> F2"   == "CONST filterlim (%x. f) F2 F1"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_iff:
hoelzl@60036:   "(LIM x F1. f x :> F2) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>P. eventually P F2 \<longrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>x. P (f x)) F1)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filterlim_def le_filter_def eventually_filtermap ..
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_compose:
hoelzl@60036:   "filterlim g F3 F2 \<Longrightarrow> filterlim f F2 F1 \<Longrightarrow> filterlim (\<lambda>x. g (f x)) F3 F1"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filterlim_def filtermap_filtermap[symmetric] by (metis filtermap_mono order_trans)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_mono:
hoelzl@60036:   "filterlim f F2 F1 \<Longrightarrow> F2 \<le> F2' \<Longrightarrow> F1' \<le> F1 \<Longrightarrow> filterlim f F2' F1'"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filterlim_def by (metis filtermap_mono order_trans)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_ident: "LIM x F. x :> F"
hoelzl@60036:   by (simp add: filterlim_def filtermap_ident)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_cong:
hoelzl@60036:   "F1 = F1' \<Longrightarrow> F2 = F2' \<Longrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>x. f x = g x) F2 \<Longrightarrow> filterlim f F1 F2 = filterlim g F1' F2'"
hoelzl@60036:   by (auto simp: filterlim_def le_filter_def eventually_filtermap elim: eventually_elim2)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_mono_eventually:
hoelzl@60036:   assumes "filterlim f F G" and ord: "F \<le> F'" "G' \<le> G"
hoelzl@60036:   assumes eq: "eventually (\<lambda>x. f x = f' x) G'"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "filterlim f' F' G'"
hoelzl@60036:   apply (rule filterlim_cong[OF refl refl eq, THEN iffD1])
hoelzl@60036:   apply (rule filterlim_mono[OF _ ord])
hoelzl@60036:   apply fact
hoelzl@60036:   done
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filtermap_mono_strong: "inj f \<Longrightarrow> filtermap f F \<le> filtermap f G \<longleftrightarrow> F \<le> G"
hoelzl@60036:   apply (auto intro!: filtermap_mono) []
hoelzl@60036:   apply (auto simp: le_filter_def eventually_filtermap)
hoelzl@60036:   apply (erule_tac x="\<lambda>x. P (inv f x)" in allE)
hoelzl@60036:   apply auto
hoelzl@60036:   done
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filtermap_eq_strong: "inj f \<Longrightarrow> filtermap f F = filtermap f G \<longleftrightarrow> F = G"
hoelzl@60036:   by (simp add: filtermap_mono_strong eq_iff)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60721: lemma filtermap_fun_inverse:
hoelzl@60721:   assumes g: "filterlim g F G"
hoelzl@60721:   assumes f: "filterlim f G F"
hoelzl@60721:   assumes ev: "eventually (\<lambda>x. f (g x) = x) G"
hoelzl@60721:   shows "filtermap f F = G"
hoelzl@60721: proof (rule antisym)
hoelzl@60721:   show "filtermap f F \<le> G"
hoelzl@60721:     using f unfolding filterlim_def .
hoelzl@60721:   have "G = filtermap f (filtermap g G)"
hoelzl@60721:     using ev by (auto elim: eventually_elim2 simp: filter_eq_iff eventually_filtermap)
hoelzl@60721:   also have "\<dots> \<le> filtermap f F"
hoelzl@60721:     using g by (intro filtermap_mono) (simp add: filterlim_def)
hoelzl@60721:   finally show "G \<le> filtermap f F" .
hoelzl@60721: qed
hoelzl@60721: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_principal:
hoelzl@60036:   "(LIM x F. f x :> principal S) \<longleftrightarrow> (eventually (\<lambda>x. f x \<in> S) F)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filterlim_def eventually_filtermap le_principal ..
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_inf:
hoelzl@60036:   "(LIM x F1. f x :> inf F2 F3) \<longleftrightarrow> ((LIM x F1. f x :> F2) \<and> (LIM x F1. f x :> F3))"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filterlim_def by simp
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_INF:
hoelzl@60036:   "(LIM x F. f x :> (INF b:B. G b)) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>b\<in>B. LIM x F. f x :> G b)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filterlim_def le_INF_iff ..
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_INF_INF:
hoelzl@60036:   "(\<And>m. m \<in> J \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>i\<in>I. filtermap f (F i) \<le> G m) \<Longrightarrow> LIM x (INF i:I. F i). f x :> (INF j:J. G j)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filterlim_def by (rule order_trans[OF filtermap_INF INF_mono])
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_base:
lp15@61806:   "(\<And>m x. m \<in> J \<Longrightarrow> i m \<in> I) \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>m x. m \<in> J \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> F (i m) \<Longrightarrow> f x \<in> G m) \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@60036:     LIM x (INF i:I. principal (F i)). f x :> (INF j:J. principal (G j))"
hoelzl@60036:   by (force intro!: filterlim_INF_INF simp: image_subset_iff)
hoelzl@60036: 
lp15@61806: lemma filterlim_base_iff:
hoelzl@60036:   assumes "I \<noteq> {}" and chain: "\<And>i j. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> j \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> F i \<subseteq> F j \<or> F j \<subseteq> F i"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "(LIM x (INF i:I. principal (F i)). f x :> INF j:J. principal (G j)) \<longleftrightarrow>
hoelzl@60036:     (\<forall>j\<in>J. \<exists>i\<in>I. \<forall>x\<in>F i. f x \<in> G j)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filterlim_INF filterlim_principal
hoelzl@60036: proof (subst eventually_INF_base)
hoelzl@60036:   fix i j assume "i \<in> I" "j \<in> I"
hoelzl@60036:   with chain[OF this] show "\<exists>x\<in>I. principal (F x) \<le> inf (principal (F i)) (principal (F j))"
hoelzl@60036:     by auto
wenzelm@60758: qed (auto simp: eventually_principal \<open>I \<noteq> {}\<close>)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_filtermap: "filterlim f F1 (filtermap g F2) = filterlim (\<lambda>x. f (g x)) F1 F2"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filterlim_def filtermap_filtermap ..
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_sup:
hoelzl@60036:   "filterlim f F F1 \<Longrightarrow> filterlim f F F2 \<Longrightarrow> filterlim f F (sup F1 F2)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filterlim_def filtermap_sup by auto
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_sequentially_Suc:
hoelzl@60036:   "(LIM x sequentially. f (Suc x) :> F) \<longleftrightarrow> (LIM x sequentially. f x :> F)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filterlim_iff by (subst eventually_sequentially_Suc) simp
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_Suc: "filterlim Suc sequentially sequentially"
hoelzl@60036:   by (simp add: filterlim_iff eventually_sequentially) (metis le_Suc_eq)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60182: lemma filterlim_If:
hoelzl@60182:   "LIM x inf F (principal {x. P x}). f x :> G \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@60182:     LIM x inf F (principal {x. \<not> P x}). g x :> G \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@60182:     LIM x F. if P x then f x else g x :> G"
hoelzl@60182:   unfolding filterlim_iff eventually_inf_principal by (auto simp: eventually_conj_iff)
hoelzl@60036: 
wenzelm@60758: subsection \<open>Limits to @{const at_top} and @{const at_bot}\<close>
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_at_top:
hoelzl@60036:   fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> ('b::linorder)"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "(LIM x F. f x :> at_top) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>Z. eventually (\<lambda>x. Z \<le> f x) F)"
lp15@61810:   by (auto simp: filterlim_iff eventually_at_top_linorder elim!: eventually_mono)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_at_top_mono:
hoelzl@60036:   "LIM x F. f x :> at_top \<Longrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>x. f x \<le> (g x::'a::linorder)) F \<Longrightarrow>
hoelzl@60036:     LIM x F. g x :> at_top"
hoelzl@60036:   by (auto simp: filterlim_at_top elim: eventually_elim2 intro: order_trans)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_at_top_dense:
hoelzl@60036:   fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> ('b::unbounded_dense_linorder)"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "(LIM x F. f x :> at_top) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>Z. eventually (\<lambda>x. Z < f x) F)"
lp15@61810:   by (metis eventually_mono[of _ F] eventually_gt_at_top order_less_imp_le
hoelzl@60036:             filterlim_at_top[of f F] filterlim_iff[of f at_top F])
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_at_top_ge:
hoelzl@60036:   fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> ('b::linorder)" and c :: "'b"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "(LIM x F. f x :> at_top) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>Z\<ge>c. eventually (\<lambda>x. Z \<le> f x) F)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding at_top_sub[of c] filterlim_INF by (auto simp add: filterlim_principal)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_at_top_at_top:
hoelzl@60036:   fixes f :: "'a::linorder \<Rightarrow> 'b::linorder"
hoelzl@60036:   assumes mono: "\<And>x y. Q x \<Longrightarrow> Q y \<Longrightarrow> x \<le> y \<Longrightarrow> f x \<le> f y"
hoelzl@60036:   assumes bij: "\<And>x. P x \<Longrightarrow> f (g x) = x" "\<And>x. P x \<Longrightarrow> Q (g x)"
hoelzl@60036:   assumes Q: "eventually Q at_top"
hoelzl@60036:   assumes P: "eventually P at_top"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "filterlim f at_top at_top"
hoelzl@60036: proof -
hoelzl@60036:   from P obtain x where x: "\<And>y. x \<le> y \<Longrightarrow> P y"
hoelzl@60036:     unfolding eventually_at_top_linorder by auto
hoelzl@60036:   show ?thesis
hoelzl@60036:   proof (intro filterlim_at_top_ge[THEN iffD2] allI impI)
hoelzl@60036:     fix z assume "x \<le> z"
hoelzl@60036:     with x have "P z" by auto
hoelzl@60036:     have "eventually (\<lambda>x. g z \<le> x) at_top"
hoelzl@60036:       by (rule eventually_ge_at_top)
hoelzl@60036:     with Q show "eventually (\<lambda>x. z \<le> f x) at_top"
wenzelm@60758:       by eventually_elim (metis mono bij \<open>P z\<close>)
hoelzl@60036:   qed
hoelzl@60036: qed
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_at_top_gt:
hoelzl@60036:   fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> ('b::unbounded_dense_linorder)" and c :: "'b"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "(LIM x F. f x :> at_top) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>Z>c. eventually (\<lambda>x. Z \<le> f x) F)"
hoelzl@60036:   by (metis filterlim_at_top order_less_le_trans gt_ex filterlim_at_top_ge)
hoelzl@60036: 
lp15@61806: lemma filterlim_at_bot:
hoelzl@60036:   fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> ('b::linorder)"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "(LIM x F. f x :> at_bot) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>Z. eventually (\<lambda>x. f x \<le> Z) F)"
lp15@61810:   by (auto simp: filterlim_iff eventually_at_bot_linorder elim!: eventually_mono)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_at_bot_dense:
hoelzl@60036:   fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> ('b::{dense_linorder, no_bot})"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "(LIM x F. f x :> at_bot) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>Z. eventually (\<lambda>x. f x < Z) F)"
hoelzl@60036: proof (auto simp add: filterlim_at_bot[of f F])
hoelzl@60036:   fix Z :: 'b
hoelzl@60036:   from lt_ex [of Z] obtain Z' where 1: "Z' < Z" ..
hoelzl@60036:   assume "\<forall>Z. eventually (\<lambda>x. f x \<le> Z) F"
hoelzl@60036:   hence "eventually (\<lambda>x. f x \<le> Z') F" by auto
hoelzl@60036:   thus "eventually (\<lambda>x. f x < Z) F"
lp15@61810:     apply (rule eventually_mono)
hoelzl@60036:     using 1 by auto
lp15@61806:   next
lp15@61806:     fix Z :: 'b
hoelzl@60036:     show "\<forall>Z. eventually (\<lambda>x. f x < Z) F \<Longrightarrow> eventually (\<lambda>x. f x \<le> Z) F"
lp15@61810:       by (drule spec [of _ Z], erule eventually_mono, auto simp add: less_imp_le)
hoelzl@60036: qed
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_at_bot_le:
hoelzl@60036:   fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> ('b::linorder)" and c :: "'b"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "(LIM x F. f x :> at_bot) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>Z\<le>c. eventually (\<lambda>x. Z \<ge> f x) F)"
hoelzl@60036:   unfolding filterlim_at_bot
hoelzl@60036: proof safe
hoelzl@60036:   fix Z assume *: "\<forall>Z\<le>c. eventually (\<lambda>x. Z \<ge> f x) F"
hoelzl@60036:   with *[THEN spec, of "min Z c"] show "eventually (\<lambda>x. Z \<ge> f x) F"
lp15@61810:     by (auto elim!: eventually_mono)
hoelzl@60036: qed simp
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filterlim_at_bot_lt:
hoelzl@60036:   fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> ('b::unbounded_dense_linorder)" and c :: "'b"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "(LIM x F. f x :> at_bot) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>Z<c. eventually (\<lambda>x. Z \<ge> f x) F)"
hoelzl@60036:   by (metis filterlim_at_bot filterlim_at_bot_le lt_ex order_le_less_trans)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: 
wenzelm@60758: subsection \<open>Setup @{typ "'a filter"} for lifting and transfer\<close>
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: context begin interpretation lifting_syntax .
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: definition rel_filter :: "('a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> bool) \<Rightarrow> 'a filter \<Rightarrow> 'b filter \<Rightarrow> bool"
hoelzl@60036: where "rel_filter R F G = ((R ===> op =) ===> op =) (Rep_filter F) (Rep_filter G)"
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma rel_filter_eventually:
lp15@61806:   "rel_filter R F G \<longleftrightarrow>
hoelzl@60036:   ((R ===> op =) ===> op =) (\<lambda>P. eventually P F) (\<lambda>P. eventually P G)"
hoelzl@60036: by(simp add: rel_filter_def eventually_def)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filtermap_id [simp, id_simps]: "filtermap id = id"
hoelzl@60036: by(simp add: fun_eq_iff id_def filtermap_ident)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma filtermap_id' [simp]: "filtermap (\<lambda>x. x) = (\<lambda>F. F)"
hoelzl@60036: using filtermap_id unfolding id_def .
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma Quotient_filter [quot_map]:
hoelzl@60036:   assumes Q: "Quotient R Abs Rep T"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "Quotient (rel_filter R) (filtermap Abs) (filtermap Rep) (rel_filter T)"
hoelzl@60036: unfolding Quotient_alt_def
hoelzl@60036: proof(intro conjI strip)
hoelzl@60036:   from Q have *: "\<And>x y. T x y \<Longrightarrow> Abs x = y"
hoelzl@60036:     unfolding Quotient_alt_def by blast
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036:   fix F G
hoelzl@60036:   assume "rel_filter T F G"
hoelzl@60036:   thus "filtermap Abs F = G" unfolding filter_eq_iff
hoelzl@60036:     by(auto simp add: eventually_filtermap rel_filter_eventually * rel_funI del: iffI elim!: rel_funD)
hoelzl@60036: next
hoelzl@60036:   from Q have *: "\<And>x. T (Rep x) x" unfolding Quotient_alt_def by blast
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036:   fix F
lp15@61806:   show "rel_filter T (filtermap Rep F) F"
hoelzl@60036:     by(auto elim: rel_funD intro: * intro!: ext arg_cong[where f="\<lambda>P. eventually P F"] rel_funI
hoelzl@60036:             del: iffI simp add: eventually_filtermap rel_filter_eventually)
hoelzl@60036: qed(auto simp add: map_fun_def o_def eventually_filtermap filter_eq_iff fun_eq_iff rel_filter_eventually
hoelzl@60036:          fun_quotient[OF fun_quotient[OF Q identity_quotient] identity_quotient, unfolded Quotient_alt_def])
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma eventually_parametric [transfer_rule]:
hoelzl@60036:   "((A ===> op =) ===> rel_filter A ===> op =) eventually eventually"
hoelzl@60036: by(simp add: rel_fun_def rel_filter_eventually)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60038: lemma frequently_parametric [transfer_rule]:
hoelzl@60038:   "((A ===> op =) ===> rel_filter A ===> op =) frequently frequently"
hoelzl@60038:   unfolding frequently_def[abs_def] by transfer_prover
hoelzl@60038: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma rel_filter_eq [relator_eq]: "rel_filter op = = op ="
hoelzl@60036: by(auto simp add: rel_filter_eventually rel_fun_eq fun_eq_iff filter_eq_iff)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma rel_filter_mono [relator_mono]:
hoelzl@60036:   "A \<le> B \<Longrightarrow> rel_filter A \<le> rel_filter B"
hoelzl@60036: unfolding rel_filter_eventually[abs_def]
hoelzl@60036: by(rule le_funI)+(intro fun_mono fun_mono[THEN le_funD, THEN le_funD] order.refl)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma rel_filter_conversep [simp]: "rel_filter A\<inverse>\<inverse> = (rel_filter A)\<inverse>\<inverse>"
lp15@61233: apply (simp add: rel_filter_eventually fun_eq_iff rel_fun_def)
lp15@61233: apply (safe; metis)
lp15@61233: done
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma is_filter_parametric_aux:
hoelzl@60036:   assumes "is_filter F"
hoelzl@60036:   assumes [transfer_rule]: "bi_total A" "bi_unique A"
hoelzl@60036:   and [transfer_rule]: "((A ===> op =) ===> op =) F G"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "is_filter G"
hoelzl@60036: proof -
hoelzl@60036:   interpret is_filter F by fact
hoelzl@60036:   show ?thesis
hoelzl@60036:   proof
hoelzl@60036:     have "F (\<lambda>_. True) = G (\<lambda>x. True)" by transfer_prover
hoelzl@60036:     thus "G (\<lambda>x. True)" by(simp add: True)
hoelzl@60036:   next
hoelzl@60036:     fix P' Q'
hoelzl@60036:     assume "G P'" "G Q'"
hoelzl@60036:     moreover
wenzelm@60758:     from bi_total_fun[OF \<open>bi_unique A\<close> bi_total_eq, unfolded bi_total_def]
hoelzl@60036:     obtain P Q where [transfer_rule]: "(A ===> op =) P P'" "(A ===> op =) Q Q'" by blast
hoelzl@60036:     have "F P = G P'" "F Q = G Q'" by transfer_prover+
hoelzl@60036:     ultimately have "F (\<lambda>x. P x \<and> Q x)" by(simp add: conj)
hoelzl@60036:     moreover have "F (\<lambda>x. P x \<and> Q x) = G (\<lambda>x. P' x \<and> Q' x)" by transfer_prover
hoelzl@60036:     ultimately show "G (\<lambda>x. P' x \<and> Q' x)" by simp
hoelzl@60036:   next
hoelzl@60036:     fix P' Q'
hoelzl@60036:     assume "\<forall>x. P' x \<longrightarrow> Q' x" "G P'"
hoelzl@60036:     moreover
wenzelm@60758:     from bi_total_fun[OF \<open>bi_unique A\<close> bi_total_eq, unfolded bi_total_def]
hoelzl@60036:     obtain P Q where [transfer_rule]: "(A ===> op =) P P'" "(A ===> op =) Q Q'" by blast
hoelzl@60036:     have "F P = G P'" by transfer_prover
hoelzl@60036:     moreover have "(\<forall>x. P x \<longrightarrow> Q x) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x. P' x \<longrightarrow> Q' x)" by transfer_prover
hoelzl@60036:     ultimately have "F Q" by(simp add: mono)
hoelzl@60036:     moreover have "F Q = G Q'" by transfer_prover
hoelzl@60036:     ultimately show "G Q'" by simp
hoelzl@60036:   qed
hoelzl@60036: qed
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma is_filter_parametric [transfer_rule]:
hoelzl@60036:   "\<lbrakk> bi_total A; bi_unique A \<rbrakk>
hoelzl@60036:   \<Longrightarrow> (((A ===> op =) ===> op =) ===> op =) is_filter is_filter"
hoelzl@60036: apply(rule rel_funI)
hoelzl@60036: apply(rule iffI)
hoelzl@60036:  apply(erule (3) is_filter_parametric_aux)
hoelzl@60036: apply(erule is_filter_parametric_aux[where A="conversep A"])
lp15@61233: apply (simp_all add: rel_fun_def)
lp15@61233: apply metis
hoelzl@60036: done
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma left_total_rel_filter [transfer_rule]:
hoelzl@60036:   assumes [transfer_rule]: "bi_total A" "bi_unique A"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "left_total (rel_filter A)"
hoelzl@60036: proof(rule left_totalI)
hoelzl@60036:   fix F :: "'a filter"
wenzelm@60758:   from bi_total_fun[OF bi_unique_fun[OF \<open>bi_total A\<close> bi_unique_eq] bi_total_eq]
lp15@61806:   obtain G where [transfer_rule]: "((A ===> op =) ===> op =) (\<lambda>P. eventually P F) G"
hoelzl@60036:     unfolding  bi_total_def by blast
hoelzl@60036:   moreover have "is_filter (\<lambda>P. eventually P F) \<longleftrightarrow> is_filter G" by transfer_prover
hoelzl@60036:   hence "is_filter G" by(simp add: eventually_def is_filter_Rep_filter)
hoelzl@60036:   ultimately have "rel_filter A F (Abs_filter G)"
hoelzl@60036:     by(simp add: rel_filter_eventually eventually_Abs_filter)
hoelzl@60036:   thus "\<exists>G. rel_filter A F G" ..
hoelzl@60036: qed
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma right_total_rel_filter [transfer_rule]:
hoelzl@60036:   "\<lbrakk> bi_total A; bi_unique A \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> right_total (rel_filter A)"
hoelzl@60036: using left_total_rel_filter[of "A\<inverse>\<inverse>"] by simp
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma bi_total_rel_filter [transfer_rule]:
hoelzl@60036:   assumes "bi_total A" "bi_unique A"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "bi_total (rel_filter A)"
hoelzl@60036: unfolding bi_total_alt_def using assms
hoelzl@60036: by(simp add: left_total_rel_filter right_total_rel_filter)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma left_unique_rel_filter [transfer_rule]:
hoelzl@60036:   assumes "left_unique A"
hoelzl@60036:   shows "left_unique (rel_filter A)"
hoelzl@60036: proof(rule left_uniqueI)
hoelzl@60036:   fix F F' G
hoelzl@60036:   assume [transfer_rule]: "rel_filter A F G" "rel_filter A F' G"
hoelzl@60036:   show "F = F'"
hoelzl@60036:     unfolding filter_eq_iff
hoelzl@60036:   proof
hoelzl@60036:     fix P :: "'a \<Rightarrow> bool"
hoelzl@60036:     obtain P' where [transfer_rule]: "(A ===> op =) P P'"
hoelzl@60036:       using left_total_fun[OF assms left_total_eq] unfolding left_total_def by blast
lp15@61806:     have "eventually P F = eventually P' G"
hoelzl@60036:       and "eventually P F' = eventually P' G" by transfer_prover+
hoelzl@60036:     thus "eventually P F = eventually P F'" by simp
hoelzl@60036:   qed
hoelzl@60036: qed
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma right_unique_rel_filter [transfer_rule]:
hoelzl@60036:   "right_unique A \<Longrightarrow> right_unique (rel_filter A)"
hoelzl@60036: using left_unique_rel_filter[of "A\<inverse>\<inverse>"] by simp
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma bi_unique_rel_filter [transfer_rule]:
hoelzl@60036:   "bi_unique A \<Longrightarrow> bi_unique (rel_filter A)"
hoelzl@60036: by(simp add: bi_unique_alt_def left_unique_rel_filter right_unique_rel_filter)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma top_filter_parametric [transfer_rule]:
hoelzl@60036:   "bi_total A \<Longrightarrow> (rel_filter A) top top"
hoelzl@60036: by(simp add: rel_filter_eventually All_transfer)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma bot_filter_parametric [transfer_rule]: "(rel_filter A) bot bot"
hoelzl@60036: by(simp add: rel_filter_eventually rel_fun_def)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma sup_filter_parametric [transfer_rule]:
hoelzl@60036:   "(rel_filter A ===> rel_filter A ===> rel_filter A) sup sup"
hoelzl@60036: by(fastforce simp add: rel_filter_eventually[abs_def] eventually_sup dest: rel_funD)
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma Sup_filter_parametric [transfer_rule]:
hoelzl@60036:   "(rel_set (rel_filter A) ===> rel_filter A) Sup Sup"
hoelzl@60036: proof(rule rel_funI)
hoelzl@60036:   fix S T
hoelzl@60036:   assume [transfer_rule]: "rel_set (rel_filter A) S T"
hoelzl@60036:   show "rel_filter A (Sup S) (Sup T)"
hoelzl@60036:     by(simp add: rel_filter_eventually eventually_Sup) transfer_prover
hoelzl@60036: qed
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma principal_parametric [transfer_rule]:
hoelzl@60036:   "(rel_set A ===> rel_filter A) principal principal"
hoelzl@60036: proof(rule rel_funI)
hoelzl@60036:   fix S S'
hoelzl@60036:   assume [transfer_rule]: "rel_set A S S'"
hoelzl@60036:   show "rel_filter A (principal S) (principal S')"
hoelzl@60036:     by(simp add: rel_filter_eventually eventually_principal) transfer_prover
hoelzl@60036: qed
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: context
hoelzl@60036:   fixes A :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> bool"
lp15@61806:   assumes [transfer_rule]: "bi_unique A"
hoelzl@60036: begin
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma le_filter_parametric [transfer_rule]:
hoelzl@60036:   "(rel_filter A ===> rel_filter A ===> op =) op \<le> op \<le>"
hoelzl@60036: unfolding le_filter_def[abs_def] by transfer_prover
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma less_filter_parametric [transfer_rule]:
hoelzl@60036:   "(rel_filter A ===> rel_filter A ===> op =) op < op <"
hoelzl@60036: unfolding less_filter_def[abs_def] by transfer_prover
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: context
hoelzl@60036:   assumes [transfer_rule]: "bi_total A"
hoelzl@60036: begin
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma Inf_filter_parametric [transfer_rule]:
hoelzl@60036:   "(rel_set (rel_filter A) ===> rel_filter A) Inf Inf"
hoelzl@60036: unfolding Inf_filter_def[abs_def] by transfer_prover
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: lemma inf_filter_parametric [transfer_rule]:
hoelzl@60036:   "(rel_filter A ===> rel_filter A ===> rel_filter A) inf inf"
hoelzl@60036: proof(intro rel_funI)+
hoelzl@60036:   fix F F' G G'
hoelzl@60036:   assume [transfer_rule]: "rel_filter A F F'" "rel_filter A G G'"
hoelzl@60036:   have "rel_filter A (Inf {F, G}) (Inf {F', G'})" by transfer_prover
hoelzl@60036:   thus "rel_filter A (inf F G) (inf F' G')" by simp
hoelzl@60036: qed
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: end
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: end
hoelzl@60036: 
hoelzl@60036: end
hoelzl@60036: 
lp15@61806: end




