
wenzelm@23465: (* Title:      HOL/Presburger.thy
wenzelm@23465:    Author:     Amine Chaieb, TU Muenchen
wenzelm@23465: *)
wenzelm@23465: 
huffman@23472: header {* Decision Procedure for Presburger Arithmetic *}
huffman@23472: 
wenzelm@23465: theory Presburger
huffman@47317: imports Groebner_Basis Set_Interval
wenzelm@23465: begin
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@48891: ML_file "Tools/Qelim/qelim.ML"
wenzelm@48891: ML_file "Tools/Qelim/cooper_procedure.ML"
wenzelm@48891: 
wenzelm@23465: subsection{* The @{text "-\<infinity>"} and @{text "+\<infinity>"} Properties *}
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: lemma minf:
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>\<exists>(z ::'a::linorder).\<forall>x<z. P x = P' x; \<exists>z.\<forall>x<z. Q x = Q' x\<rbrakk> 
wenzelm@23465:      \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>z.\<forall>x<z. (P x \<and> Q x) = (P' x \<and> Q' x)"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>\<exists>(z ::'a::linorder).\<forall>x<z. P x = P' x; \<exists>z.\<forall>x<z. Q x = Q' x\<rbrakk> 
wenzelm@23465:      \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>z.\<forall>x<z. (P x \<or> Q x) = (P' x \<or> Q' x)"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x<z.(x = t) = False"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x<z.(x \<noteq> t) = True"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x<z.(x < t) = True"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x<z.(x \<le> t) = True"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x<z.(x > t) = False"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x<z.(x \<ge> t) = False"
wenzelm@45425:   "\<exists>z.\<forall>(x::'b::{linorder,plus,Rings.dvd})<z. (d dvd x + s) = (d dvd x + s)"
wenzelm@45425:   "\<exists>z.\<forall>(x::'b::{linorder,plus,Rings.dvd})<z. (\<not> d dvd x + s) = (\<not> d dvd x + s)"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<exists>z.\<forall>x<z. F = F"
nipkow@44890:   by ((erule exE, erule exE,rule_tac x="min z za" in exI,simp)+, (rule_tac x="t" in exI,fastforce)+) simp_all
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: lemma pinf:
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>\<exists>(z ::'a::linorder).\<forall>x>z. P x = P' x; \<exists>z.\<forall>x>z. Q x = Q' x\<rbrakk> 
wenzelm@23465:      \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>z.\<forall>x>z. (P x \<and> Q x) = (P' x \<and> Q' x)"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>\<exists>(z ::'a::linorder).\<forall>x>z. P x = P' x; \<exists>z.\<forall>x>z. Q x = Q' x\<rbrakk> 
wenzelm@23465:      \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>z.\<forall>x>z. (P x \<or> Q x) = (P' x \<or> Q' x)"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x>z.(x = t) = False"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x>z.(x \<noteq> t) = True"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x>z.(x < t) = False"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x>z.(x \<le> t) = False"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x>z.(x > t) = True"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<exists>(z ::'a::{linorder}).\<forall>x>z.(x \<ge> t) = True"
wenzelm@45425:   "\<exists>z.\<forall>(x::'b::{linorder,plus,Rings.dvd})>z. (d dvd x + s) = (d dvd x + s)"
wenzelm@45425:   "\<exists>z.\<forall>(x::'b::{linorder,plus,Rings.dvd})>z. (\<not> d dvd x + s) = (\<not> d dvd x + s)"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<exists>z.\<forall>x>z. F = F"
nipkow@44890:   by ((erule exE, erule exE,rule_tac x="max z za" in exI,simp)+,(rule_tac x="t" in exI,fastforce)+) simp_all
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: lemma inf_period:
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x k. P x = P (x - k*D); \<forall>x k. Q x = Q (x - k*D)\<rbrakk> 
wenzelm@23465:     \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x k. (P x \<and> Q x) = (P (x - k*D) \<and> Q (x - k*D))"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x k. P x = P (x - k*D); \<forall>x k. Q x = Q (x - k*D)\<rbrakk> 
wenzelm@23465:     \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x k. (P x \<or> Q x) = (P (x - k*D) \<or> Q (x - k*D))"
haftmann@35050:   "(d::'a::{comm_ring,Rings.dvd}) dvd D \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x k. (d dvd x + t) = (d dvd (x - k*D) + t)"
haftmann@35050:   "(d::'a::{comm_ring,Rings.dvd}) dvd D \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x k. (\<not>d dvd x + t) = (\<not>d dvd (x - k*D) + t)"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<forall>x k. F = F"
nipkow@29667: apply (auto elim!: dvdE simp add: algebra_simps)
haftmann@57512: unfolding mult.assoc [symmetric] distrib_right [symmetric] left_diff_distrib [symmetric]
haftmann@57512: unfolding dvd_def mult.commute [of d] 
chaieb@27668: by auto
wenzelm@23465: 
huffman@23472: subsection{* The A and B sets *}
wenzelm@23465: lemma bset:
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x.(\<forall>j \<in> {1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> P x \<longrightarrow> P(x - D) ;
wenzelm@23465:      \<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> Q x \<longrightarrow> Q(x - D)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> 
wenzelm@23465:   \<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j) \<longrightarrow> (P x \<and> Q x) \<longrightarrow> (P(x - D) \<and> Q (x - D))"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> P x \<longrightarrow> P(x - D) ;
wenzelm@23465:      \<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> Q x \<longrightarrow> Q(x - D)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> 
wenzelm@23465:   \<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (P x \<or> Q x) \<longrightarrow> (P(x - D) \<or> Q (x - D))"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>D>0; t - 1\<in> B\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x = t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D = t))"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>D>0 ; t \<in> B\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<noteq> t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D \<noteq> t))"
wenzelm@23465:   "D>0 \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x < t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D < t))"
wenzelm@23465:   "D>0 \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<le> t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D \<le> t))"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>D>0 ; t \<in> B\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x > t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D > t))"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>D>0 ; t - 1 \<in> B\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<ge> t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D \<ge> t))"
wenzelm@23465:   "d dvd D \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (d dvd x+t) \<longrightarrow> (d dvd (x - D) + t))"
wenzelm@23465:   "d dvd D \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (\<not>d dvd x+t) \<longrightarrow> (\<not> d dvd (x - D) + t))"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j) \<longrightarrow> F \<longrightarrow> F"
wenzelm@23465: proof (blast, blast)
wenzelm@23465:   assume dp: "D > 0" and tB: "t - 1\<in> B"
wenzelm@23465:   show "(\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x = t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D = t))" 
chaieb@27668:     apply (rule allI, rule impI,erule ballE[where x="1"],erule ballE[where x="t - 1"]) 
chaieb@27668:     apply algebra using dp tB by simp_all
wenzelm@23465: next
wenzelm@23465:   assume dp: "D > 0" and tB: "t \<in> B"
wenzelm@23465:   show "(\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<noteq> t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D \<noteq> t))" 
wenzelm@23465:     apply (rule allI, rule impI,erule ballE[where x="D"],erule ballE[where x="t"])
chaieb@27668:     apply algebra
wenzelm@23465:     using dp tB by simp_all
wenzelm@23465: next
wenzelm@23465:   assume dp: "D > 0" thus "(\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x < t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D < t))" by arith
wenzelm@23465: next
wenzelm@23465:   assume dp: "D > 0" thus "\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<le> t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D \<le> t)" by arith
wenzelm@23465: next
wenzelm@23465:   assume dp: "D > 0" and tB:"t \<in> B"
wenzelm@23465:   {fix x assume nob: "\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j" and g: "x > t" and ng: "\<not> (x - D) > t"
wenzelm@23465:     hence "x -t \<le> D" and "1 \<le> x - t" by simp+
wenzelm@23465:       hence "\<exists>j \<in> {1 .. D}. x - t = j" by auto
nipkow@29667:       hence "\<exists>j \<in> {1 .. D}. x = t + j" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
wenzelm@23465:       with nob tB have "False" by simp}
wenzelm@23465:   thus "\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x > t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D > t)" by blast
wenzelm@23465: next
wenzelm@23465:   assume dp: "D > 0" and tB:"t - 1\<in> B"
wenzelm@23465:   {fix x assume nob: "\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j" and g: "x \<ge> t" and ng: "\<not> (x - D) \<ge> t"
wenzelm@23465:     hence "x - (t - 1) \<le> D" and "1 \<le> x - (t - 1)" by simp+
wenzelm@23465:       hence "\<exists>j \<in> {1 .. D}. x - (t - 1) = j" by auto
nipkow@29667:       hence "\<exists>j \<in> {1 .. D}. x = (t - 1) + j" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
wenzelm@23465:       with nob tB have "False" by simp}
wenzelm@23465:   thus "\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<ge> t) \<longrightarrow> (x - D \<ge> t)" by blast
wenzelm@23465: next
wenzelm@23465:   assume d: "d dvd D"
chaieb@27668:   {fix x assume H: "d dvd x + t" with d have "d dvd (x - D) + t" by algebra}
wenzelm@23465:   thus "\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (d dvd x+t) \<longrightarrow> (d dvd (x - D) + t)" by simp
wenzelm@23465: next
wenzelm@23465:   assume d: "d dvd D"
haftmann@27651:   {fix x assume H: "\<not>(d dvd x + t)" with d have "\<not> d dvd (x - D) + t"
nipkow@29667:       by (clarsimp simp add: dvd_def,erule_tac x= "ka + k" in allE,simp add: algebra_simps)}
wenzelm@23465:   thus "\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>B. x \<noteq> b + j)\<longrightarrow> (\<not>d dvd x+t) \<longrightarrow> (\<not>d dvd (x - D) + t)" by auto
wenzelm@23465: qed blast
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: lemma aset:
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> P x \<longrightarrow> P(x + D) ;
wenzelm@23465:      \<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> Q x \<longrightarrow> Q(x + D)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> 
wenzelm@23465:   \<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j) \<longrightarrow> (P x \<and> Q x) \<longrightarrow> (P(x + D) \<and> Q (x + D))"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> P x \<longrightarrow> P(x + D) ;
wenzelm@23465:      \<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> Q x \<longrightarrow> Q(x + D)\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> 
wenzelm@23465:   \<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (P x \<or> Q x) \<longrightarrow> (P(x + D) \<or> Q (x + D))"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>D>0; t + 1\<in> A\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x = t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D = t))"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>D>0 ; t \<in> A\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<noteq> t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D \<noteq> t))"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>D>0; t\<in> A\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int). (\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x < t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D < t))"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<lbrakk>D>0; t + 1 \<in> A\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<le> t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D \<le> t))"
wenzelm@23465:   "D>0 \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x > t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D > t))"
wenzelm@23465:   "D>0 \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<ge> t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D \<ge> t))"
wenzelm@23465:   "d dvd D \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (d dvd x+t) \<longrightarrow> (d dvd (x + D) + t))"
wenzelm@23465:   "d dvd D \<Longrightarrow>(\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (\<not>d dvd x+t) \<longrightarrow> (\<not> d dvd (x + D) + t))"
wenzelm@23465:   "\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j) \<longrightarrow> F \<longrightarrow> F"
wenzelm@23465: proof (blast, blast)
wenzelm@23465:   assume dp: "D > 0" and tA: "t + 1 \<in> A"
wenzelm@23465:   show "(\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x = t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D = t))" 
wenzelm@23465:     apply (rule allI, rule impI,erule ballE[where x="1"],erule ballE[where x="t + 1"])
wenzelm@23465:     using dp tA by simp_all
wenzelm@23465: next
wenzelm@23465:   assume dp: "D > 0" and tA: "t \<in> A"
wenzelm@23465:   show "(\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<noteq> t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D \<noteq> t))" 
wenzelm@23465:     apply (rule allI, rule impI,erule ballE[where x="D"],erule ballE[where x="t"])
wenzelm@23465:     using dp tA by simp_all
wenzelm@23465: next
wenzelm@23465:   assume dp: "D > 0" thus "(\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x > t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D > t))" by arith
wenzelm@23465: next
wenzelm@23465:   assume dp: "D > 0" thus "\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<ge> t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D \<ge> t)" by arith
wenzelm@23465: next
wenzelm@23465:   assume dp: "D > 0" and tA:"t \<in> A"
wenzelm@23465:   {fix x assume nob: "\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j" and g: "x < t" and ng: "\<not> (x + D) < t"
wenzelm@23465:     hence "t - x \<le> D" and "1 \<le> t - x" by simp+
wenzelm@23465:       hence "\<exists>j \<in> {1 .. D}. t - x = j" by auto
nipkow@29667:       hence "\<exists>j \<in> {1 .. D}. x = t - j" by (auto simp add: algebra_simps) 
wenzelm@23465:       with nob tA have "False" by simp}
wenzelm@23465:   thus "\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x < t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D < t)" by blast
wenzelm@23465: next
wenzelm@23465:   assume dp: "D > 0" and tA:"t + 1\<in> A"
wenzelm@23465:   {fix x assume nob: "\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j" and g: "x \<le> t" and ng: "\<not> (x + D) \<le> t"
nipkow@29667:     hence "(t + 1) - x \<le> D" and "1 \<le> (t + 1) - x" by (simp_all add: algebra_simps)
wenzelm@23465:       hence "\<exists>j \<in> {1 .. D}. (t + 1) - x = j" by auto
nipkow@29667:       hence "\<exists>j \<in> {1 .. D}. x = (t + 1) - j" by (auto simp add: algebra_simps)
wenzelm@23465:       with nob tA have "False" by simp}
wenzelm@23465:   thus "\<forall>x.(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (x \<le> t) \<longrightarrow> (x + D \<le> t)" by blast
wenzelm@23465: next
wenzelm@23465:   assume d: "d dvd D"
wenzelm@23465:   {fix x assume H: "d dvd x + t" with d have "d dvd (x + D) + t"
nipkow@29667:       by (clarsimp simp add: dvd_def,rule_tac x= "ka + k" in exI,simp add: algebra_simps)}
wenzelm@23465:   thus "\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (d dvd x+t) \<longrightarrow> (d dvd (x + D) + t)" by simp
wenzelm@23465: next
wenzelm@23465:   assume d: "d dvd D"
wenzelm@23465:   {fix x assume H: "\<not>(d dvd x + t)" with d have "\<not>d dvd (x + D) + t"
nipkow@29667:       by (clarsimp simp add: dvd_def,erule_tac x= "ka - k" in allE,simp add: algebra_simps)}
wenzelm@23465:   thus "\<forall>(x::int).(\<forall>j\<in>{1 .. D}. \<forall>b\<in>A. x \<noteq> b - j)\<longrightarrow> (\<not>d dvd x+t) \<longrightarrow> (\<not>d dvd (x + D) + t)" by auto
wenzelm@23465: qed blast
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: subsection{* Cooper's Theorem @{text "-\<infinity>"} and @{text "+\<infinity>"} Version *}
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: subsubsection{* First some trivial facts about periodic sets or predicates *}
wenzelm@23465: lemma periodic_finite_ex:
wenzelm@23465:   assumes dpos: "(0::int) < d" and modd: "ALL x k. P x = P(x - k*d)"
wenzelm@23465:   shows "(EX x. P x) = (EX j : {1..d}. P j)"
wenzelm@23465:   (is "?LHS = ?RHS")
wenzelm@23465: proof
wenzelm@23465:   assume ?LHS
wenzelm@23465:   then obtain x where P: "P x" ..
haftmann@57514:   have "x mod d = x - (x div d)*d" by(simp add:zmod_zdiv_equality ac_simps eq_diff_eq)
wenzelm@23465:   hence Pmod: "P x = P(x mod d)" using modd by simp
wenzelm@23465:   show ?RHS
wenzelm@23465:   proof (cases)
wenzelm@23465:     assume "x mod d = 0"
wenzelm@23465:     hence "P 0" using P Pmod by simp
wenzelm@23465:     moreover have "P 0 = P(0 - (-1)*d)" using modd by blast
wenzelm@23465:     ultimately have "P d" by simp
huffman@35216:     moreover have "d : {1..d}" using dpos by simp
wenzelm@23465:     ultimately show ?RHS ..
wenzelm@23465:   next
wenzelm@23465:     assume not0: "x mod d \<noteq> 0"
huffman@35216:     have "P(x mod d)" using dpos P Pmod by simp
wenzelm@23465:     moreover have "x mod d : {1..d}"
wenzelm@23465:     proof -
wenzelm@23465:       from dpos have "0 \<le> x mod d" by(rule pos_mod_sign)
wenzelm@23465:       moreover from dpos have "x mod d < d" by(rule pos_mod_bound)
huffman@35216:       ultimately show ?thesis using not0 by simp
wenzelm@23465:     qed
wenzelm@23465:     ultimately show ?RHS ..
wenzelm@23465:   qed
wenzelm@23465: qed auto
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: subsubsection{* The @{text "-\<infinity>"} Version*}
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: lemma decr_lemma: "0 < (d::int) \<Longrightarrow> x - (abs(x-z)+1) * d < z"
wenzelm@23465: by(induct rule: int_gr_induct,simp_all add:int_distrib)
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: lemma incr_lemma: "0 < (d::int) \<Longrightarrow> z < x + (abs(x-z)+1) * d"
wenzelm@23465: by(induct rule: int_gr_induct, simp_all add:int_distrib)
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: lemma decr_mult_lemma:
wenzelm@23465:   assumes dpos: "(0::int) < d" and minus: "\<forall>x. P x \<longrightarrow> P(x - d)" and knneg: "0 <= k"
wenzelm@23465:   shows "ALL x. P x \<longrightarrow> P(x - k*d)"
wenzelm@23465: using knneg
wenzelm@23465: proof (induct rule:int_ge_induct)
wenzelm@23465:   case base thus ?case by simp
wenzelm@23465: next
wenzelm@23465:   case (step i)
wenzelm@23465:   {fix x
wenzelm@23465:     have "P x \<longrightarrow> P (x - i * d)" using step.hyps by blast
wenzelm@23465:     also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow> P(x - (i + 1) * d)" using minus[THEN spec, of "x - i * d"]
haftmann@35050:       by (simp add: algebra_simps)
wenzelm@23465:     ultimately have "P x \<longrightarrow> P(x - (i + 1) * d)" by blast}
wenzelm@23465:   thus ?case ..
wenzelm@23465: qed
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: lemma  minusinfinity:
wenzelm@23465:   assumes dpos: "0 < d" and
wenzelm@23465:     P1eqP1: "ALL x k. P1 x = P1(x - k*d)" and ePeqP1: "EX z::int. ALL x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (P x = P1 x)"
wenzelm@23465:   shows "(EX x. P1 x) \<longrightarrow> (EX x. P x)"
wenzelm@23465: proof
wenzelm@23465:   assume eP1: "EX x. P1 x"
wenzelm@23465:   then obtain x where P1: "P1 x" ..
wenzelm@23465:   from ePeqP1 obtain z where P1eqP: "ALL x. x < z \<longrightarrow> (P x = P1 x)" ..
wenzelm@23465:   let ?w = "x - (abs(x-z)+1) * d"
wenzelm@23465:   from dpos have w: "?w < z" by(rule decr_lemma)
wenzelm@23465:   have "P1 x = P1 ?w" using P1eqP1 by blast
wenzelm@23465:   also have "\<dots> = P(?w)" using w P1eqP by blast
wenzelm@23465:   finally have "P ?w" using P1 by blast
wenzelm@23465:   thus "EX x. P x" ..
wenzelm@23465: qed
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: lemma cpmi: 
wenzelm@23465:   assumes dp: "0 < D" and p1:"\<exists>z. \<forall> x< z. P x = P' x"
wenzelm@23465:   and nb:"\<forall>x.(\<forall> j\<in> {1..D}. \<forall>(b::int) \<in> B. x \<noteq> b+j) --> P (x) --> P (x - D)"
wenzelm@23465:   and pd: "\<forall> x k. P' x = P' (x-k*D)"
wenzelm@23465:   shows "(\<exists>x. P x) = ((\<exists> j\<in> {1..D} . P' j) | (\<exists> j \<in> {1..D}.\<exists> b\<in> B. P (b+j)))" 
wenzelm@23465:          (is "?L = (?R1 \<or> ?R2)")
wenzelm@23465: proof-
wenzelm@23465:  {assume "?R2" hence "?L"  by blast}
wenzelm@23465:  moreover
wenzelm@23465:  {assume H:"?R1" hence "?L" using minusinfinity[OF dp pd p1] periodic_finite_ex[OF dp pd] by simp}
wenzelm@23465:  moreover 
wenzelm@23465:  { fix x
wenzelm@23465:    assume P: "P x" and H: "\<not> ?R2"
wenzelm@23465:    {fix y assume "\<not> (\<exists>j\<in>{1..D}. \<exists>b\<in>B. P (b + j))" and P: "P y"
wenzelm@23465:      hence "~(EX (j::int) : {1..D}. EX (b::int) : B. y = b+j)" by auto
wenzelm@23465:      with nb P  have "P (y - D)" by auto }
wenzelm@23465:    hence "ALL x.~(EX (j::int) : {1..D}. EX (b::int) : B. P(b+j)) --> P (x) --> P (x - D)" by blast
wenzelm@23465:    with H P have th: " \<forall>x. P x \<longrightarrow> P (x - D)" by auto
wenzelm@23465:    from p1 obtain z where z: "ALL x. x < z --> (P x = P' x)" by blast
wenzelm@23465:    let ?y = "x - (\<bar>x - z\<bar> + 1)*D"
wenzelm@23465:    have zp: "0 <= (\<bar>x - z\<bar> + 1)" by arith
wenzelm@23465:    from dp have yz: "?y < z" using decr_lemma[OF dp] by simp   
wenzelm@23465:    from z[rule_format, OF yz] decr_mult_lemma[OF dp th zp, rule_format, OF P] have th2: " P' ?y" by auto
wenzelm@23465:    with periodic_finite_ex[OF dp pd]
wenzelm@23465:    have "?R1" by blast}
wenzelm@23465:  ultimately show ?thesis by blast
wenzelm@23465: qed
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: subsubsection {* The @{text "+\<infinity>"} Version*}
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: lemma  plusinfinity:
wenzelm@23465:   assumes dpos: "(0::int) < d" and
wenzelm@23465:     P1eqP1: "\<forall>x k. P' x = P'(x - k*d)" and ePeqP1: "\<exists> z. \<forall> x>z. P x = P' x"
wenzelm@23465:   shows "(\<exists> x. P' x) \<longrightarrow> (\<exists> x. P x)"
wenzelm@23465: proof
wenzelm@23465:   assume eP1: "EX x. P' x"
wenzelm@23465:   then obtain x where P1: "P' x" ..
wenzelm@23465:   from ePeqP1 obtain z where P1eqP: "\<forall>x>z. P x = P' x" ..
wenzelm@23465:   let ?w' = "x + (abs(x-z)+1) * d"
wenzelm@23465:   let ?w = "x - (-(abs(x-z) + 1))*d"
nipkow@29667:   have ww'[simp]: "?w = ?w'" by (simp add: algebra_simps)
wenzelm@23465:   from dpos have w: "?w > z" by(simp only: ww' incr_lemma)
wenzelm@23465:   hence "P' x = P' ?w" using P1eqP1 by blast
wenzelm@23465:   also have "\<dots> = P(?w)" using w P1eqP by blast
wenzelm@23465:   finally have "P ?w" using P1 by blast
wenzelm@23465:   thus "EX x. P x" ..
wenzelm@23465: qed
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: lemma incr_mult_lemma:
wenzelm@23465:   assumes dpos: "(0::int) < d" and plus: "ALL x::int. P x \<longrightarrow> P(x + d)" and knneg: "0 <= k"
wenzelm@23465:   shows "ALL x. P x \<longrightarrow> P(x + k*d)"
wenzelm@23465: using knneg
wenzelm@23465: proof (induct rule:int_ge_induct)
wenzelm@23465:   case base thus ?case by simp
wenzelm@23465: next
wenzelm@23465:   case (step i)
wenzelm@23465:   {fix x
wenzelm@23465:     have "P x \<longrightarrow> P (x + i * d)" using step.hyps by blast
wenzelm@23465:     also have "\<dots> \<longrightarrow> P(x + (i + 1) * d)" using plus[THEN spec, of "x + i * d"]
haftmann@57514:       by (simp add:int_distrib ac_simps)
wenzelm@23465:     ultimately have "P x \<longrightarrow> P(x + (i + 1) * d)" by blast}
wenzelm@23465:   thus ?case ..
wenzelm@23465: qed
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: lemma cppi: 
wenzelm@23465:   assumes dp: "0 < D" and p1:"\<exists>z. \<forall> x> z. P x = P' x"
wenzelm@23465:   and nb:"\<forall>x.(\<forall> j\<in> {1..D}. \<forall>(b::int) \<in> A. x \<noteq> b - j) --> P (x) --> P (x + D)"
wenzelm@23465:   and pd: "\<forall> x k. P' x= P' (x-k*D)"
wenzelm@23465:   shows "(\<exists>x. P x) = ((\<exists> j\<in> {1..D} . P' j) | (\<exists> j \<in> {1..D}.\<exists> b\<in> A. P (b - j)))" (is "?L = (?R1 \<or> ?R2)")
wenzelm@23465: proof-
wenzelm@23465:  {assume "?R2" hence "?L"  by blast}
wenzelm@23465:  moreover
wenzelm@23465:  {assume H:"?R1" hence "?L" using plusinfinity[OF dp pd p1] periodic_finite_ex[OF dp pd] by simp}
wenzelm@23465:  moreover 
wenzelm@23465:  { fix x
wenzelm@23465:    assume P: "P x" and H: "\<not> ?R2"
wenzelm@23465:    {fix y assume "\<not> (\<exists>j\<in>{1..D}. \<exists>b\<in>A. P (b - j))" and P: "P y"
wenzelm@23465:      hence "~(EX (j::int) : {1..D}. EX (b::int) : A. y = b - j)" by auto
wenzelm@23465:      with nb P  have "P (y + D)" by auto }
wenzelm@23465:    hence "ALL x.~(EX (j::int) : {1..D}. EX (b::int) : A. P(b-j)) --> P (x) --> P (x + D)" by blast
wenzelm@23465:    with H P have th: " \<forall>x. P x \<longrightarrow> P (x + D)" by auto
wenzelm@23465:    from p1 obtain z where z: "ALL x. x > z --> (P x = P' x)" by blast
wenzelm@23465:    let ?y = "x + (\<bar>x - z\<bar> + 1)*D"
wenzelm@23465:    have zp: "0 <= (\<bar>x - z\<bar> + 1)" by arith
wenzelm@23465:    from dp have yz: "?y > z" using incr_lemma[OF dp] by simp
wenzelm@23465:    from z[rule_format, OF yz] incr_mult_lemma[OF dp th zp, rule_format, OF P] have th2: " P' ?y" by auto
wenzelm@23465:    with periodic_finite_ex[OF dp pd]
wenzelm@23465:    have "?R1" by blast}
wenzelm@23465:  ultimately show ?thesis by blast
wenzelm@23465: qed
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: lemma simp_from_to: "{i..j::int} = (if j < i then {} else insert i {i+1..j})"
wenzelm@23465: apply(simp add:atLeastAtMost_def atLeast_def atMost_def)
nipkow@44890: apply(fastforce)
wenzelm@23465: done
wenzelm@23465: 
haftmann@35050: theorem unity_coeff_ex: "(\<exists>(x::'a::{semiring_0,Rings.dvd}). P (l * x)) \<equiv> (\<exists>x. l dvd (x + 0) \<and> P x)"
haftmann@27651:   apply (rule eq_reflection [symmetric])
wenzelm@23465:   apply (rule iffI)
wenzelm@23465:   defer
wenzelm@23465:   apply (erule exE)
wenzelm@23465:   apply (rule_tac x = "l * x" in exI)
wenzelm@23465:   apply (simp add: dvd_def)
haftmann@27651:   apply (rule_tac x = x in exI, simp)
wenzelm@23465:   apply (erule exE)
wenzelm@23465:   apply (erule conjE)
haftmann@27651:   apply simp
wenzelm@23465:   apply (erule dvdE)
wenzelm@23465:   apply (rule_tac x = k in exI)
wenzelm@23465:   apply simp
wenzelm@23465:   done
wenzelm@23465: 
haftmann@54227: lemma zdvd_mono:
haftmann@54227:   fixes k m t :: int
haftmann@54227:   assumes "k \<noteq> 0"
haftmann@54227:   shows "m dvd t \<equiv> k * m dvd k * t" 
haftmann@54227:   using assms by simp
wenzelm@23465: 
haftmann@54227: lemma uminus_dvd_conv:
haftmann@54227:   fixes d t :: int
haftmann@54227:   shows "d dvd t \<equiv> - d dvd t" and "d dvd t \<equiv> d dvd - t"
wenzelm@23465:   by simp_all
haftmann@32553: 
wenzelm@23465: text {* \bigskip Theorems for transforming predicates on nat to predicates on @{text int}*}
haftmann@32553: 
wenzelm@23465: lemma zdiff_int_split: "P (int (x - y)) =
wenzelm@23465:   ((y \<le> x \<longrightarrow> P (int x - int y)) \<and> (x < y \<longrightarrow> P 0))"
haftmann@36800:   by (cases "y \<le> x") (simp_all add: zdiff_int)
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@23465: text {*
wenzelm@23465:   \medskip Specific instances of congruence rules, to prevent
wenzelm@23465:   simplifier from looping. *}
wenzelm@23465: 
huffman@47108: theorem imp_le_cong:
huffman@47108:   "\<lbrakk>x = x'; 0 \<le> x' \<Longrightarrow> P = P'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (0 \<le> (x::int) \<longrightarrow> P) = (0 \<le> x' \<longrightarrow> P')"
huffman@47108:   by simp
wenzelm@23465: 
huffman@47108: theorem conj_le_cong:
huffman@47108:   "\<lbrakk>x = x'; 0 \<le> x' \<Longrightarrow> P = P'\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (0 \<le> (x::int) \<and> P) = (0 \<le> x' \<and> P')"
wenzelm@23465:   by (simp cong: conj_cong)
haftmann@36799: 
wenzelm@48891: ML_file "Tools/Qelim/cooper.ML"
haftmann@36799: setup Cooper.setup
wenzelm@23465: 
wenzelm@47432: method_setup presburger = {*
wenzelm@47432:   let
wenzelm@47432:     fun keyword k = Scan.lift (Args.$$$ k -- Args.colon) >> K ()
wenzelm@47432:     fun simple_keyword k = Scan.lift (Args.$$$ k) >> K ()
wenzelm@47432:     val addN = "add"
wenzelm@47432:     val delN = "del"
wenzelm@47432:     val elimN = "elim"
wenzelm@47432:     val any_keyword = keyword addN || keyword delN || simple_keyword elimN
wenzelm@47432:     val thms = Scan.repeat (Scan.unless any_keyword Attrib.multi_thm) >> flat;
wenzelm@47432:   in
wenzelm@47432:     Scan.optional (simple_keyword elimN >> K false) true --
wenzelm@47432:     Scan.optional (keyword addN |-- thms) [] --
wenzelm@47432:     Scan.optional (keyword delN |-- thms) [] >>
wenzelm@47432:     (fn ((elim, add_ths), del_ths) => fn ctxt =>
wenzelm@47432:       SIMPLE_METHOD' (Cooper.tac elim add_ths del_ths ctxt))
wenzelm@47432:   end
wenzelm@47432: *} "Cooper's algorithm for Presburger arithmetic"
wenzelm@23465: 
haftmann@54227: declare dvd_eq_mod_eq_0 [symmetric, presburger]
haftmann@54227: declare mod_1 [presburger] 
haftmann@54227: declare mod_0 [presburger]
haftmann@54227: declare mod_by_1 [presburger]
haftmann@54227: declare mod_self [presburger]
haftmann@54227: declare div_by_0 [presburger]
haftmann@54227: declare mod_by_0 [presburger]
haftmann@54227: declare mod_div_trivial [presburger]
haftmann@54227: declare div_mod_equality2 [presburger]
haftmann@54227: declare div_mod_equality [presburger]
haftmann@54227: declare mod_div_equality2 [presburger]
haftmann@54227: declare mod_div_equality [presburger]
haftmann@54227: declare mod_mult_self1 [presburger]
haftmann@54227: declare mod_mult_self2 [presburger]
haftmann@36798: declare mod2_Suc_Suc[presburger]
haftmann@54227: declare not_mod_2_eq_0_eq_1 [presburger] 
haftmann@54227: declare nat_zero_less_power_iff [presburger]
haftmann@36798: 
chaieb@27668: lemma [presburger, algebra]: "m mod 2 = (1::nat) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> 2 dvd m " by presburger
chaieb@27668: lemma [presburger, algebra]: "m mod 2 = Suc 0 \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> 2 dvd m " by presburger
chaieb@27668: lemma [presburger, algebra]: "m mod (Suc (Suc 0)) = (1::nat) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> 2 dvd m " by presburger
chaieb@27668: lemma [presburger, algebra]: "m mod (Suc (Suc 0)) = Suc 0 \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> 2 dvd m " by presburger
chaieb@27668: lemma [presburger, algebra]: "m mod 2 = (1::int) \<longleftrightarrow> \<not> 2 dvd m " by presburger
wenzelm@23465: 
blanchet@56850: 
blanchet@56850: subsection {* Try0 *}
blanchet@56850: 
blanchet@56850: ML_file "Tools/try0.ML"
blanchet@56850: 
wenzelm@23465: end




