paulson@10751: (*  Title       : Series.thy
paulson@10751:     Author      : Jacques D. Fleuriot
paulson@10751:     Copyright   : 1998  University of Cambridge
paulson@14416: 
paulson@14416: Converted to Isar and polished by lcp
nipkow@15539: Converted to setsum and polished yet more by TNN
avigad@16819: Additional contributions by Jeremy Avigad
hoelzl@41970: *)
paulson@10751: 
hoelzl@56213: header {* Infinite Series *}
paulson@10751: 
nipkow@15131: theory Series
hoelzl@51528: imports Limits
nipkow@15131: begin
nipkow@15561: 
hoelzl@56213: subsection {* Definition of infinite summability *}
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56193: definition
hoelzl@56193:   sums :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::{topological_space, comm_monoid_add}) \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> bool"
hoelzl@56193:   (infixr "sums" 80)
hoelzl@56193: where
hoelzl@56193:   "f sums s \<longleftrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. \<Sum>i<n. f i) ----> s"
paulson@14416: 
hoelzl@56193: definition summable :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::{topological_space, comm_monoid_add}) \<Rightarrow> bool" where
hoelzl@56193:    "summable f \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>s. f sums s)"
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: definition
hoelzl@56193:   suminf :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::{topological_space, comm_monoid_add}) \<Rightarrow> 'a"
hoelzl@56193:   (binder "\<Sum>" 10)
hoelzl@56193: where
hoelzl@56193:   "suminf f = (THE s. f sums s)"
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56213: subsection {* Infinite summability on topological monoids *}
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma sums_subst[trans]: "f = g \<Longrightarrow> g sums z \<Longrightarrow> f sums z"
hoelzl@56193:   by simp
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma sums_summable: "f sums l \<Longrightarrow> summable f"
hoelzl@41970:   by (simp add: sums_def summable_def, blast)
paulson@14416: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma summable_iff_convergent: "summable f \<longleftrightarrow> convergent (\<lambda>n. \<Sum>i<n. f i)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (simp add: summable_def sums_def convergent_def)
paulson@14416: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma suminf_eq_lim: "suminf f = lim (\<lambda>n. \<Sum>i<n. f i)"
hoelzl@41970:   by (simp add: suminf_def sums_def lim_def)
paulson@32707: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma sums_zero[simp, intro]: "(\<lambda>n. 0) sums 0"
hoelzl@56213:   unfolding sums_def by (simp add: tendsto_const)
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma summable_zero[simp, intro]: "summable (\<lambda>n. 0)"
hoelzl@56213:   by (rule sums_zero [THEN sums_summable])
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma sums_group: "f sums s \<Longrightarrow> 0 < k \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. setsum f {n * k ..< n * k + k}) sums s"
hoelzl@56213:   apply (simp only: sums_def setsum_nat_group tendsto_def eventually_sequentially)
hoelzl@56213:   apply safe
hoelzl@56213:   apply (erule_tac x=S in allE)
hoelzl@56213:   apply safe
hoelzl@56213:   apply (rule_tac x="N" in exI, safe)
hoelzl@56213:   apply (drule_tac x="n*k" in spec)
hoelzl@56213:   apply (erule mp)
hoelzl@56213:   apply (erule order_trans)
hoelzl@56213:   apply simp
hoelzl@56213:   done
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@47761: lemma sums_finite:
hoelzl@56193:   assumes [simp]: "finite N" and f: "\<And>n. n \<notin> N \<Longrightarrow> f n = 0"
hoelzl@47761:   shows "f sums (\<Sum>n\<in>N. f n)"
hoelzl@47761: proof -
hoelzl@47761:   { fix n
hoelzl@47761:     have "setsum f {..<n + Suc (Max N)} = setsum f N"
hoelzl@47761:     proof cases
hoelzl@47761:       assume "N = {}"
hoelzl@47761:       with f have "f = (\<lambda>x. 0)" by auto
hoelzl@47761:       then show ?thesis by simp
hoelzl@47761:     next
hoelzl@47761:       assume [simp]: "N \<noteq> {}"
hoelzl@47761:       show ?thesis
haftmann@57418:       proof (safe intro!: setsum.mono_neutral_right f)
hoelzl@47761:         fix i assume "i \<in> N"
hoelzl@47761:         then have "i \<le> Max N" by simp
hoelzl@47761:         then show "i < n + Suc (Max N)" by simp
hoelzl@47761:       qed
hoelzl@47761:     qed }
hoelzl@47761:   note eq = this
hoelzl@47761:   show ?thesis unfolding sums_def
hoelzl@47761:     by (rule LIMSEQ_offset[of _ "Suc (Max N)"])
hoelzl@47761:        (simp add: eq atLeast0LessThan tendsto_const del: add_Suc_right)
hoelzl@47761: qed
hoelzl@47761: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma summable_finite: "finite N \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>n. n \<notin> N \<Longrightarrow> f n = 0) \<Longrightarrow> summable f"
hoelzl@56213:   by (rule sums_summable) (rule sums_finite)
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma sums_If_finite_set: "finite A \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>r. if r \<in> A then f r else 0) sums (\<Sum>r\<in>A. f r)"
hoelzl@47761:   using sums_finite[of A "(\<lambda>r. if r \<in> A then f r else 0)"] by simp
hoelzl@47761: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma summable_If_finite_set[simp, intro]: "finite A \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>r. if r \<in> A then f r else 0)"
hoelzl@56213:   by (rule sums_summable) (rule sums_If_finite_set)
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma sums_If_finite: "finite {r. P r} \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>r. if P r then f r else 0) sums (\<Sum>r | P r. f r)"
hoelzl@56193:   using sums_If_finite_set[of "{r. P r}"] by simp
avigad@16819: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma summable_If_finite[simp, intro]: "finite {r. P r} \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>r. if P r then f r else 0)"
hoelzl@56213:   by (rule sums_summable) (rule sums_If_finite)
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma sums_single: "(\<lambda>r. if r = i then f r else 0) sums f i"
hoelzl@56193:   using sums_If_finite[of "\<lambda>r. r = i"] by simp
hoelzl@29803: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma summable_single[simp, intro]: "summable (\<lambda>r. if r = i then f r else 0)"
hoelzl@56213:   by (rule sums_summable) (rule sums_single)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: context
hoelzl@56193:   fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::{t2_space, comm_monoid_add}"
hoelzl@56193: begin
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma summable_sums[intro]: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> f sums (suminf f)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (simp add: summable_def sums_def suminf_def)
hoelzl@56193:      (metis convergent_LIMSEQ_iff convergent_def lim_def)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma summable_LIMSEQ: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. \<Sum>i<n. f i) ----> suminf f"
hoelzl@56193:   by (rule summable_sums [unfolded sums_def])
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma sums_unique: "f sums s \<Longrightarrow> s = suminf f"
hoelzl@56193:   by (metis limI suminf_eq_lim sums_def)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma sums_iff: "f sums x \<longleftrightarrow> summable f \<and> (suminf f = x)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (metis summable_sums sums_summable sums_unique)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma suminf_finite:
hoelzl@56193:   assumes N: "finite N" and f: "\<And>n. n \<notin> N \<Longrightarrow> f n = 0"
hoelzl@56193:   shows "suminf f = (\<Sum>n\<in>N. f n)"
hoelzl@56193:   using sums_finite[OF assms, THEN sums_unique] by simp
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: end
avigad@16819: 
hoelzl@41970: lemma suminf_zero[simp]: "suminf (\<lambda>n. 0::'a::{t2_space, comm_monoid_add}) = 0"
hoelzl@56193:   by (rule sums_zero [THEN sums_unique, symmetric])
avigad@16819: 
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56213: subsection {* Infinite summability on ordered, topological monoids *}
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma sums_le:
hoelzl@56213:   fixes f g :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::{ordered_comm_monoid_add, linorder_topology}"
hoelzl@56213:   shows "\<forall>n. f n \<le> g n \<Longrightarrow> f sums s \<Longrightarrow> g sums t \<Longrightarrow> s \<le> t"
hoelzl@56213:   by (rule LIMSEQ_le) (auto intro: setsum_mono simp: sums_def)
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56193: context
hoelzl@56193:   fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::{ordered_comm_monoid_add, linorder_topology}"
hoelzl@56193: begin
paulson@14416: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma suminf_le: "\<lbrakk>\<forall>n. f n \<le> g n; summable f; summable g\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> suminf f \<le> suminf g"
hoelzl@56213:   by (auto dest: sums_summable intro: sums_le)
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma setsum_le_suminf: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>m\<ge>n. 0 \<le> f m \<Longrightarrow> setsum f {..<n} \<le> suminf f"
hoelzl@56213:   by (rule sums_le[OF _ sums_If_finite_set summable_sums]) auto
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma suminf_nonneg: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>n. 0 \<le> f n \<Longrightarrow> 0 \<le> suminf f"
hoelzl@56213:   using setsum_le_suminf[of 0] by simp
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma setsum_less_suminf2: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>m\<ge>n. 0 \<le> f m \<Longrightarrow> n \<le> i \<Longrightarrow> 0 < f i \<Longrightarrow> setsum f {..<n} < suminf f"
hoelzl@56213:   using
hoelzl@56213:     setsum_le_suminf[of "Suc i"]
hoelzl@56213:     add_strict_increasing[of "f i" "setsum f {..<n}" "setsum f {..<i}"]
hoelzl@56213:     setsum_mono2[of "{..<i}" "{..<n}" f]
hoelzl@56213:   by (auto simp: less_imp_le ac_simps)
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma setsum_less_suminf: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>m\<ge>n. 0 < f m \<Longrightarrow> setsum f {..<n} < suminf f"
hoelzl@56213:   using setsum_less_suminf2[of n n] by (simp add: less_imp_le)
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma suminf_pos2: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>n. 0 \<le> f n \<Longrightarrow> 0 < f i \<Longrightarrow> 0 < suminf f"
hoelzl@56213:   using setsum_less_suminf2[of 0 i] by simp
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma suminf_pos: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>n. 0 < f n \<Longrightarrow> 0 < suminf f"
hoelzl@56213:   using suminf_pos2[of 0] by (simp add: less_imp_le)
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma suminf_le_const: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>n. setsum f {..<n} \<le> x) \<Longrightarrow> suminf f \<le> x"
hoelzl@56213:   by (metis LIMSEQ_le_const2 summable_LIMSEQ)
paulson@14416: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma suminf_eq_zero_iff: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>n. 0 \<le> f n \<Longrightarrow> suminf f = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>n. f n = 0)"
hoelzl@50999: proof
hoelzl@50999:   assume "summable f" "suminf f = 0" and pos: "\<forall>n. 0 \<le> f n"
hoelzl@50999:   then have f: "(\<lambda>n. \<Sum>i<n. f i) ----> 0"
hoelzl@56213:     using summable_LIMSEQ[of f] by simp
hoelzl@56213:   then have "\<And>i. (\<Sum>n\<in>{i}. f n) \<le> 0"
hoelzl@56213:   proof (rule LIMSEQ_le_const)
hoelzl@50999:     fix i show "\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. (\<Sum>n\<in>{i}. f n) \<le> setsum f {..<n}"
hoelzl@50999:       using pos by (intro exI[of _ "Suc i"] allI impI setsum_mono2) auto
hoelzl@50999:   qed
hoelzl@50999:   with pos show "\<forall>n. f n = 0"
hoelzl@50999:     by (auto intro!: antisym)
hoelzl@56193: qed (metis suminf_zero fun_eq_iff)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma suminf_pos_iff: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>n. 0 \<le> f n \<Longrightarrow> 0 < suminf f \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>i. 0 < f i)"
hoelzl@56213:   using setsum_le_suminf[of 0] suminf_eq_zero_iff by (simp add: less_le)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: end
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma summableI_nonneg_bounded:
hoelzl@56213:   fixes f:: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::{ordered_comm_monoid_add, linorder_topology, conditionally_complete_linorder}"
hoelzl@56213:   assumes pos[simp]: "\<And>n. 0 \<le> f n" and le: "\<And>n. (\<Sum>i<n. f i) \<le> x"
hoelzl@56213:   shows "summable f"
hoelzl@56213:   unfolding summable_def sums_def[abs_def]
hoelzl@56213: proof (intro exI order_tendstoI)
hoelzl@56213:   have [simp, intro]: "bdd_above (range (\<lambda>n. \<Sum>i<n. f i))"
hoelzl@56213:     using le by (auto simp: bdd_above_def)
hoelzl@56213:   { fix a assume "a < (SUP n. \<Sum>i<n. f i)"
hoelzl@56213:     then obtain n where "a < (\<Sum>i<n. f i)"
hoelzl@56213:       by (auto simp add: less_cSUP_iff)
hoelzl@56213:     then have "\<And>m. n \<le> m \<Longrightarrow> a < (\<Sum>i<m. f i)"
hoelzl@56213:       by (rule less_le_trans) (auto intro!: setsum_mono2)
hoelzl@56213:     then show "eventually (\<lambda>n. a < (\<Sum>i<n. f i)) sequentially"
hoelzl@56213:       by (auto simp: eventually_sequentially) }
hoelzl@56213:   { fix a assume "(SUP n. \<Sum>i<n. f i) < a"
hoelzl@56213:     moreover have "\<And>n. (\<Sum>i<n. f i) \<le> (SUP n. \<Sum>i<n. f i)"
hoelzl@56213:       by (auto intro: cSUP_upper)
hoelzl@56213:     ultimately show "eventually (\<lambda>n. (\<Sum>i<n. f i) < a) sequentially"
hoelzl@56213:       by (auto intro: le_less_trans simp: eventually_sequentially) }
hoelzl@56213: qed
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56213: subsection {* Infinite summability on real normed vector spaces *}
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma sums_Suc_iff:
hoelzl@56193:   fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::real_normed_vector"
hoelzl@56193:   shows "(\<lambda>n. f (Suc n)) sums s \<longleftrightarrow> f sums (s + f 0)"
hoelzl@56193: proof -
hoelzl@56193:   have "f sums (s + f 0) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<lambda>i. \<Sum>j<Suc i. f j) ----> s + f 0"
hoelzl@56193:     by (subst LIMSEQ_Suc_iff) (simp add: sums_def)
hoelzl@56193:   also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<lambda>i. (\<Sum>j<i. f (Suc j)) + f 0) ----> s + f 0"
haftmann@57418:     by (simp add: ac_simps setsum.reindex image_iff lessThan_Suc_eq_insert_0)
hoelzl@56193:   also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. f (Suc n)) sums s"
hoelzl@56193:   proof
hoelzl@56193:     assume "(\<lambda>i. (\<Sum>j<i. f (Suc j)) + f 0) ----> s + f 0"
hoelzl@56193:     with tendsto_add[OF this tendsto_const, of "- f 0"]
hoelzl@56193:     show "(\<lambda>i. f (Suc i)) sums s"
hoelzl@56193:       by (simp add: sums_def)
hoelzl@56193:   qed (auto intro: tendsto_add tendsto_const simp: sums_def)
hoelzl@56193:   finally show ?thesis ..
hoelzl@50999: qed
hoelzl@50999: 
hoelzl@56193: context
hoelzl@56193:   fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::real_normed_vector"
hoelzl@56193: begin
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma sums_add: "f sums a \<Longrightarrow> g sums b \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. f n + g n) sums (a + b)"
haftmann@57418:   unfolding sums_def by (simp add: setsum.distrib tendsto_add)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma summable_add: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> summable g \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. f n + g n)"
hoelzl@56193:   unfolding summable_def by (auto intro: sums_add)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma suminf_add: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> summable g \<Longrightarrow> suminf f + suminf g = (\<Sum>n. f n + g n)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (intro sums_unique sums_add summable_sums)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma sums_diff: "f sums a \<Longrightarrow> g sums b \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. f n - g n) sums (a - b)"
hoelzl@56193:   unfolding sums_def by (simp add: setsum_subtractf tendsto_diff)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma summable_diff: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> summable g \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. f n - g n)"
hoelzl@56193:   unfolding summable_def by (auto intro: sums_diff)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma suminf_diff: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> summable g \<Longrightarrow> suminf f - suminf g = (\<Sum>n. f n - g n)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (intro sums_unique sums_diff summable_sums)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma sums_minus: "f sums a \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. - f n) sums (- a)"
hoelzl@56193:   unfolding sums_def by (simp add: setsum_negf tendsto_minus)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma summable_minus: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. - f n)"
hoelzl@56193:   unfolding summable_def by (auto intro: sums_minus)
huffman@20692: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma suminf_minus: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> (\<Sum>n. - f n) = - (\<Sum>n. f n)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (intro sums_unique [symmetric] sums_minus summable_sums)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma sums_Suc: "(\<lambda> n. f (Suc n)) sums l \<Longrightarrow> f sums (l + f 0)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (simp add: sums_Suc_iff)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma sums_iff_shift: "(\<lambda>i. f (i + n)) sums s \<longleftrightarrow> f sums (s + (\<Sum>i<n. f i))"
hoelzl@56193: proof (induct n arbitrary: s)
hoelzl@56193:   case (Suc n)
hoelzl@56193:   moreover have "(\<lambda>i. f (Suc i + n)) sums s \<longleftrightarrow> (\<lambda>i. f (i + n)) sums (s + f n)"
hoelzl@56193:     by (subst sums_Suc_iff) simp
hoelzl@56193:   ultimately show ?case
hoelzl@56193:     by (simp add: ac_simps)
hoelzl@56193: qed simp
huffman@20692: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma summable_iff_shift: "summable (\<lambda>n. f (n + k)) \<longleftrightarrow> summable f"
hoelzl@56193:   by (metis diff_add_cancel summable_def sums_iff_shift[abs_def])
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma sums_split_initial_segment: "f sums s \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>i. f (i + n)) sums (s - (\<Sum>i<n. f i))"
hoelzl@56193:   by (simp add: sums_iff_shift)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma summable_ignore_initial_segment: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. f(n + k))"
hoelzl@56193:   by (simp add: summable_iff_shift)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma suminf_minus_initial_segment: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> (\<Sum>n. f (n + k)) = (\<Sum>n. f n) - (\<Sum>i<k. f i)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (rule sums_unique[symmetric]) (auto simp: sums_iff_shift)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma suminf_split_initial_segment: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> suminf f = (\<Sum>n. f(n + k)) + (\<Sum>i<k. f i)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (auto simp add: suminf_minus_initial_segment)
huffman@20692: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma suminf_exist_split: 
hoelzl@56193:   fixes r :: real assumes "0 < r" and "summable f"
hoelzl@56193:   shows "\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (\<Sum>i. f (i + n)) < r"
hoelzl@56193: proof -
hoelzl@56193:   from LIMSEQ_D[OF summable_LIMSEQ[OF `summable f`] `0 < r`]
hoelzl@56193:   obtain N :: nat where "\<forall> n \<ge> N. norm (setsum f {..<n} - suminf f) < r" by auto
hoelzl@56193:   thus ?thesis
hoelzl@56193:     by (auto simp: norm_minus_commute suminf_minus_initial_segment[OF `summable f`])
hoelzl@56193: qed
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma summable_LIMSEQ_zero: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> f ----> 0"
hoelzl@56193:   apply (drule summable_iff_convergent [THEN iffD1])
hoelzl@56193:   apply (drule convergent_Cauchy)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (simp only: Cauchy_iff LIMSEQ_iff, safe)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (drule_tac x="r" in spec, safe)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (rule_tac x="M" in exI, safe)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (drule_tac x="Suc n" in spec, simp)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (drule_tac x="n" in spec, simp)
hoelzl@56193:   done
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: end
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@57025: context
hoelzl@57025:   fixes f :: "'i \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::real_normed_vector" and I :: "'i set"
hoelzl@57025: begin
hoelzl@57025: 
hoelzl@57025: lemma sums_setsum: "(\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> (f i) sums (x i)) \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. \<Sum>i\<in>I. f i n) sums (\<Sum>i\<in>I. x i)"
hoelzl@57025:   by (induct I rule: infinite_finite_induct) (auto intro!: sums_add)
hoelzl@57025: 
hoelzl@57025: lemma suminf_setsum: "(\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> summable (f i)) \<Longrightarrow> (\<Sum>n. \<Sum>i\<in>I. f i n) = (\<Sum>i\<in>I. \<Sum>n. f i n)"
hoelzl@57025:   using sums_unique[OF sums_setsum, OF summable_sums] by simp
hoelzl@57025: 
hoelzl@57025: lemma summable_setsum: "(\<And>i. i \<in> I \<Longrightarrow> summable (f i)) \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. \<Sum>i\<in>I. f i n)"
hoelzl@57025:   using sums_summable[OF sums_setsum[OF summable_sums]] .
hoelzl@57025: 
hoelzl@57025: end
hoelzl@57025: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma (in bounded_linear) sums: "(\<lambda>n. X n) sums a \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. f (X n)) sums (f a)"
hoelzl@56193:   unfolding sums_def by (drule tendsto, simp only: setsum)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma (in bounded_linear) summable: "summable (\<lambda>n. X n) \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. f (X n))"
hoelzl@56193:   unfolding summable_def by (auto intro: sums)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma (in bounded_linear) suminf: "summable (\<lambda>n. X n) \<Longrightarrow> f (\<Sum>n. X n) = (\<Sum>n. f (X n))"
hoelzl@56193:   by (intro sums_unique sums summable_sums)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemmas sums_of_real = bounded_linear.sums [OF bounded_linear_of_real]
hoelzl@56193: lemmas summable_of_real = bounded_linear.summable [OF bounded_linear_of_real]
hoelzl@56193: lemmas suminf_of_real = bounded_linear.suminf [OF bounded_linear_of_real]
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@57275: lemmas sums_scaleR_left = bounded_linear.sums[OF bounded_linear_scaleR_left]
hoelzl@57275: lemmas summable_scaleR_left = bounded_linear.summable[OF bounded_linear_scaleR_left]
hoelzl@57275: lemmas suminf_scaleR_left = bounded_linear.suminf[OF bounded_linear_scaleR_left]
hoelzl@57275: 
hoelzl@57275: lemmas sums_scaleR_right = bounded_linear.sums[OF bounded_linear_scaleR_right]
hoelzl@57275: lemmas summable_scaleR_right = bounded_linear.summable[OF bounded_linear_scaleR_right]
hoelzl@57275: lemmas suminf_scaleR_right = bounded_linear.suminf[OF bounded_linear_scaleR_right]
hoelzl@57275: 
hoelzl@56213: subsection {* Infinite summability on real normed algebras *}
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56193: context
hoelzl@56193:   fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::real_normed_algebra"
hoelzl@56193: begin
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma sums_mult: "f sums a \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. c * f n) sums (c * a)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (rule bounded_linear.sums [OF bounded_linear_mult_right])
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma summable_mult: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. c * f n)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (rule bounded_linear.summable [OF bounded_linear_mult_right])
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma suminf_mult: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> suminf (\<lambda>n. c * f n) = c * suminf f"
hoelzl@56193:   by (rule bounded_linear.suminf [OF bounded_linear_mult_right, symmetric])
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma sums_mult2: "f sums a \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. f n * c) sums (a * c)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (rule bounded_linear.sums [OF bounded_linear_mult_left])
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma summable_mult2: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. f n * c)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (rule bounded_linear.summable [OF bounded_linear_mult_left])
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma suminf_mult2: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> suminf f * c = (\<Sum>n. f n * c)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (rule bounded_linear.suminf [OF bounded_linear_mult_left])
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: end
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56213: subsection {* Infinite summability on real normed fields *}
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56193: context
hoelzl@56193:   fixes c :: "'a::real_normed_field"
hoelzl@56193: begin
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma sums_divide: "f sums a \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. f n / c) sums (a / c)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (rule bounded_linear.sums [OF bounded_linear_divide])
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma summable_divide: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. f n / c)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (rule bounded_linear.summable [OF bounded_linear_divide])
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma suminf_divide: "summable f \<Longrightarrow> suminf (\<lambda>n. f n / c) = suminf f / c"
hoelzl@56193:   by (rule bounded_linear.suminf [OF bounded_linear_divide, symmetric])
paulson@14416: 
paulson@15085: text{*Sum of a geometric progression.*}
paulson@14416: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma geometric_sums: "norm c < 1 \<Longrightarrow> (\<lambda>n. c^n) sums (1 / (1 - c))"
huffman@20692: proof -
hoelzl@56193:   assume less_1: "norm c < 1"
hoelzl@56193:   hence neq_1: "c \<noteq> 1" by auto
hoelzl@56193:   hence neq_0: "c - 1 \<noteq> 0" by simp
hoelzl@56193:   from less_1 have lim_0: "(\<lambda>n. c^n) ----> 0"
huffman@20692:     by (rule LIMSEQ_power_zero)
hoelzl@56193:   hence "(\<lambda>n. c ^ n / (c - 1) - 1 / (c - 1)) ----> 0 / (c - 1) - 1 / (c - 1)"
huffman@44568:     using neq_0 by (intro tendsto_intros)
hoelzl@56193:   hence "(\<lambda>n. (c ^ n - 1) / (c - 1)) ----> 1 / (1 - c)"
huffman@20692:     by (simp add: nonzero_minus_divide_right [OF neq_0] diff_divide_distrib)
hoelzl@56193:   thus "(\<lambda>n. c ^ n) sums (1 / (1 - c))"
huffman@20692:     by (simp add: sums_def geometric_sum neq_1)
huffman@20692: qed
huffman@20692: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma summable_geometric: "norm c < 1 \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. c^n)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (rule geometric_sums [THEN sums_summable])
paulson@14416: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma suminf_geometric: "norm c < 1 \<Longrightarrow> suminf (\<lambda>n. c^n) = 1 / (1 - c)"
hoelzl@56193:   by (rule sums_unique[symmetric]) (rule geometric_sums)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: end
paulson@33271: 
paulson@33271: lemma power_half_series: "(\<lambda>n. (1/2::real)^Suc n) sums 1"
paulson@33271: proof -
paulson@33271:   have 2: "(\<lambda>n. (1/2::real)^n) sums 2" using geometric_sums [of "1/2::real"]
paulson@33271:     by auto
paulson@33271:   have "(\<lambda>n. (1/2::real)^Suc n) = (\<lambda>n. (1 / 2) ^ n / 2)"
paulson@33271:     by simp
huffman@44282:   thus ?thesis using sums_divide [OF 2, of 2]
paulson@33271:     by simp
paulson@33271: qed
paulson@33271: 
hoelzl@56213: subsection {* Infinite summability on Banach spaces *}
hoelzl@56213: 
paulson@15085: text{*Cauchy-type criterion for convergence of series (c.f. Harrison)*}
paulson@15085: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma summable_Cauchy:
hoelzl@56193:   fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::banach"
hoelzl@56193:   shows "summable f \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>e>0. \<exists>N. \<forall>m\<ge>N. \<forall>n. norm (setsum f {m..<n}) < e)"
hoelzl@56193:   apply (simp only: summable_iff_convergent Cauchy_convergent_iff [symmetric] Cauchy_iff, safe)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (drule spec, drule (1) mp)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (erule exE, rule_tac x="M" in exI, clarify)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (rule_tac x="m" and y="n" in linorder_le_cases)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (frule (1) order_trans)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (drule_tac x="n" in spec, drule (1) mp)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (drule_tac x="m" in spec, drule (1) mp)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (simp_all add: setsum_diff [symmetric])
hoelzl@56193:   apply (drule spec, drule (1) mp)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (erule exE, rule_tac x="N" in exI, clarify)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (rule_tac x="m" and y="n" in linorder_le_cases)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (subst norm_minus_commute)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (simp_all add: setsum_diff [symmetric])
hoelzl@56193:   done
paulson@14416: 
hoelzl@56193: context
hoelzl@56193:   fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::banach"
hoelzl@56193: begin  
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: text{*Absolute convergence imples normal convergence*}
huffman@20689: 
hoelzl@56194: lemma summable_norm_cancel: "summable (\<lambda>n. norm (f n)) \<Longrightarrow> summable f"
hoelzl@56193:   apply (simp only: summable_Cauchy, safe)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (drule_tac x="e" in spec, safe)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (rule_tac x="N" in exI, safe)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (drule_tac x="m" in spec, safe)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (rule order_le_less_trans [OF norm_setsum])
hoelzl@56193:   apply (rule order_le_less_trans [OF abs_ge_self])
hoelzl@56193:   apply simp
hoelzl@50999:   done
paulson@32707: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma summable_norm: "summable (\<lambda>n. norm (f n)) \<Longrightarrow> norm (suminf f) \<le> (\<Sum>n. norm (f n))"
hoelzl@56193:   by (auto intro: LIMSEQ_le tendsto_norm summable_norm_cancel summable_LIMSEQ norm_setsum)
hoelzl@56193: 
hoelzl@56193: text {* Comparison tests *}
paulson@14416: 
hoelzl@56194: lemma summable_comparison_test: "\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (f n) \<le> g n \<Longrightarrow> summable g \<Longrightarrow> summable f"
hoelzl@56193:   apply (simp add: summable_Cauchy, safe)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (drule_tac x="e" in spec, safe)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (rule_tac x = "N + Na" in exI, safe)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (rotate_tac 2)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (drule_tac x = m in spec)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (auto, rotate_tac 2, drule_tac x = n in spec)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (rule_tac y = "\<Sum>k=m..<n. norm (f k)" in order_le_less_trans)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (rule norm_setsum)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (rule_tac y = "setsum g {m..<n}" in order_le_less_trans)
hoelzl@56193:   apply (auto intro: setsum_mono simp add: abs_less_iff)
hoelzl@56193:   done
hoelzl@56193: 
lp15@56217: (*A better argument order*)
lp15@56217: lemma summable_comparison_test': "summable g \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>n. n \<ge> N \<Longrightarrow> norm(f n) \<le> g n) \<Longrightarrow> summable f"
hoelzl@56369:   by (rule summable_comparison_test) auto
lp15@56217: 
hoelzl@56193: subsection {* The Ratio Test*}
paulson@15085: 
hoelzl@56193: lemma summable_ratio_test: 
hoelzl@56193:   assumes "c < 1" "\<And>n. n \<ge> N \<Longrightarrow> norm (f (Suc n)) \<le> c * norm (f n)"
hoelzl@56193:   shows "summable f"
hoelzl@56193: proof cases
hoelzl@56193:   assume "0 < c"
hoelzl@56193:   show "summable f"
hoelzl@56193:   proof (rule summable_comparison_test)
hoelzl@56193:     show "\<exists>N'. \<forall>n\<ge>N'. norm (f n) \<le> (norm (f N) / (c ^ N)) * c ^ n"
hoelzl@56193:     proof (intro exI allI impI)
hoelzl@56193:       fix n assume "N \<le> n" then show "norm (f n) \<le> (norm (f N) / (c ^ N)) * c ^ n"
hoelzl@56193:       proof (induct rule: inc_induct)
hoelzl@56193:         case (step m)
hoelzl@56193:         moreover have "norm (f (Suc m)) / c ^ Suc m * c ^ n \<le> norm (f m) / c ^ m * c ^ n"
hoelzl@56193:           using `0 < c` `c < 1` assms(2)[OF `N \<le> m`] by (simp add: field_simps)
hoelzl@56193:         ultimately show ?case by simp
hoelzl@56193:       qed (insert `0 < c`, simp)
hoelzl@56193:     qed
hoelzl@56193:     show "summable (\<lambda>n. norm (f N) / c ^ N * c ^ n)"
hoelzl@56193:       using `0 < c` `c < 1` by (intro summable_mult summable_geometric) simp
hoelzl@56193:   qed
hoelzl@56193: next
hoelzl@56193:   assume c: "\<not> 0 < c"
hoelzl@56193:   { fix n assume "n \<ge> N"
hoelzl@56193:     then have "norm (f (Suc n)) \<le> c * norm (f n)"
hoelzl@56193:       by fact
hoelzl@56193:     also have "\<dots> \<le> 0"
hoelzl@56193:       using c by (simp add: not_less mult_nonpos_nonneg)
hoelzl@56193:     finally have "f (Suc n) = 0"
hoelzl@56193:       by auto }
hoelzl@56193:   then show "summable f"
hoelzl@56194:     by (intro sums_summable[OF sums_finite, of "{.. Suc N}"]) (auto simp: not_le Suc_less_eq2)
lp15@56178: qed
lp15@56178: 
hoelzl@56193: end
paulson@14416: 
hoelzl@56369: text{*Relations among convergence and absolute convergence for power series.*}
hoelzl@56369: 
hoelzl@56369: lemma abel_lemma:
hoelzl@56369:   fixes a :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::real_normed_vector"
hoelzl@56369:   assumes r: "0 \<le> r" and r0: "r < r0" and M: "\<And>n. norm (a n) * r0^n \<le> M"
hoelzl@56369:     shows "summable (\<lambda>n. norm (a n) * r^n)"
hoelzl@56369: proof (rule summable_comparison_test')
hoelzl@56369:   show "summable (\<lambda>n. M * (r / r0) ^ n)"
hoelzl@56369:     using assms 
hoelzl@56369:     by (auto simp add: summable_mult summable_geometric)
hoelzl@56369: next
hoelzl@56369:   fix n
hoelzl@56369:   show "norm (norm (a n) * r ^ n) \<le> M * (r / r0) ^ n"
hoelzl@56369:     using r r0 M [of n]
hoelzl@56369:     apply (auto simp add: abs_mult field_simps power_divide)
hoelzl@56369:     apply (cases "r=0", simp)
hoelzl@56369:     apply (cases n, auto)
hoelzl@56369:     done
hoelzl@56369: qed
hoelzl@56369: 
hoelzl@56369: 
huffman@23084: text{*Summability of geometric series for real algebras*}
huffman@23084: 
huffman@23084: lemma complete_algebra_summable_geometric:
haftmann@31017:   fixes x :: "'a::{real_normed_algebra_1,banach}"
huffman@23084:   shows "norm x < 1 \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. x ^ n)"
huffman@23084: proof (rule summable_comparison_test)
huffman@23084:   show "\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (x ^ n) \<le> norm x ^ n"
huffman@23084:     by (simp add: norm_power_ineq)
huffman@23084:   show "norm x < 1 \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. norm x ^ n)"
huffman@23084:     by (simp add: summable_geometric)
huffman@23084: qed
huffman@23084: 
huffman@23111: subsection {* Cauchy Product Formula *}
huffman@23111: 
wenzelm@54703: text {*
wenzelm@54703:   Proof based on Analysis WebNotes: Chapter 07, Class 41
wenzelm@54703:   @{url "http://www.math.unl.edu/~webnotes/classes/class41/prp77.htm"}
wenzelm@54703: *}
huffman@23111: 
huffman@23111: lemma setsum_triangle_reindex:
huffman@23111:   fixes n :: nat
hoelzl@56213:   shows "(\<Sum>(i,j)\<in>{(i,j). i+j < n}. f i j) = (\<Sum>k<n. \<Sum>i\<le>k. f i (k - i))"
haftmann@57418:   apply (simp add: setsum.Sigma)
hoelzl@57129:   apply (rule setsum.reindex_bij_witness[where j="\<lambda>(i, j). (i+j, i)" and i="\<lambda>(k, i). (i, k - i)"])
hoelzl@57129:   apply auto
hoelzl@57129:   done
huffman@23111: 
huffman@23111: lemma Cauchy_product_sums:
huffman@23111:   fixes a b :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::{real_normed_algebra,banach}"
huffman@23111:   assumes a: "summable (\<lambda>k. norm (a k))"
huffman@23111:   assumes b: "summable (\<lambda>k. norm (b k))"
hoelzl@56213:   shows "(\<lambda>k. \<Sum>i\<le>k. a i * b (k - i)) sums ((\<Sum>k. a k) * (\<Sum>k. b k))"
huffman@23111: proof -
hoelzl@56193:   let ?S1 = "\<lambda>n::nat. {..<n} \<times> {..<n}"
huffman@23111:   let ?S2 = "\<lambda>n::nat. {(i,j). i + j < n}"
huffman@23111:   have S1_mono: "\<And>m n. m \<le> n \<Longrightarrow> ?S1 m \<subseteq> ?S1 n" by auto
huffman@23111:   have S2_le_S1: "\<And>n. ?S2 n \<subseteq> ?S1 n" by auto
huffman@23111:   have S1_le_S2: "\<And>n. ?S1 (n div 2) \<subseteq> ?S2 n" by auto
huffman@23111:   have finite_S1: "\<And>n. finite (?S1 n)" by simp
huffman@23111:   with S2_le_S1 have finite_S2: "\<And>n. finite (?S2 n)" by (rule finite_subset)
huffman@23111: 
huffman@23111:   let ?g = "\<lambda>(i,j). a i * b j"
huffman@23111:   let ?f = "\<lambda>(i,j). norm (a i) * norm (b j)"
nipkow@56536:   have f_nonneg: "\<And>x. 0 \<le> ?f x" by (auto)
huffman@23111:   hence norm_setsum_f: "\<And>A. norm (setsum ?f A) = setsum ?f A"
huffman@23111:     unfolding real_norm_def
huffman@23111:     by (simp only: abs_of_nonneg setsum_nonneg [rule_format])
huffman@23111: 
hoelzl@56193:   have "(\<lambda>n. (\<Sum>k<n. a k) * (\<Sum>k<n. b k)) ----> (\<Sum>k. a k) * (\<Sum>k. b k)"
hoelzl@56193:     by (intro tendsto_mult summable_LIMSEQ summable_norm_cancel [OF a] summable_norm_cancel [OF b])
huffman@23111:   hence 1: "(\<lambda>n. setsum ?g (?S1 n)) ----> (\<Sum>k. a k) * (\<Sum>k. b k)"
haftmann@57418:     by (simp only: setsum_product setsum.Sigma [rule_format] finite_lessThan)
huffman@23111: 
hoelzl@56193:   have "(\<lambda>n. (\<Sum>k<n. norm (a k)) * (\<Sum>k<n. norm (b k))) ----> (\<Sum>k. norm (a k)) * (\<Sum>k. norm (b k))"
hoelzl@56193:     using a b by (intro tendsto_mult summable_LIMSEQ)
huffman@23111:   hence "(\<lambda>n. setsum ?f (?S1 n)) ----> (\<Sum>k. norm (a k)) * (\<Sum>k. norm (b k))"
haftmann@57418:     by (simp only: setsum_product setsum.Sigma [rule_format] finite_lessThan)
huffman@23111:   hence "convergent (\<lambda>n. setsum ?f (?S1 n))"
huffman@23111:     by (rule convergentI)
huffman@23111:   hence Cauchy: "Cauchy (\<lambda>n. setsum ?f (?S1 n))"
huffman@23111:     by (rule convergent_Cauchy)
huffman@36657:   have "Zfun (\<lambda>n. setsum ?f (?S1 n - ?S2 n)) sequentially"
huffman@36657:   proof (rule ZfunI, simp only: eventually_sequentially norm_setsum_f)
huffman@23111:     fix r :: real
huffman@23111:     assume r: "0 < r"
huffman@23111:     from CauchyD [OF Cauchy r] obtain N
huffman@23111:     where "\<forall>m\<ge>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (setsum ?f (?S1 m) - setsum ?f (?S1 n)) < r" ..
huffman@23111:     hence "\<And>m n. \<lbrakk>N \<le> n; n \<le> m\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> norm (setsum ?f (?S1 m - ?S1 n)) < r"
huffman@23111:       by (simp only: setsum_diff finite_S1 S1_mono)
huffman@23111:     hence N: "\<And>m n. \<lbrakk>N \<le> n; n \<le> m\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> setsum ?f (?S1 m - ?S1 n) < r"
huffman@23111:       by (simp only: norm_setsum_f)
huffman@23111:     show "\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. setsum ?f (?S1 n - ?S2 n) < r"
huffman@23111:     proof (intro exI allI impI)
huffman@23111:       fix n assume "2 * N \<le> n"
huffman@23111:       hence n: "N \<le> n div 2" by simp
huffman@23111:       have "setsum ?f (?S1 n - ?S2 n) \<le> setsum ?f (?S1 n - ?S1 (n div 2))"
huffman@23111:         by (intro setsum_mono2 finite_Diff finite_S1 f_nonneg
huffman@23111:                   Diff_mono subset_refl S1_le_S2)
huffman@23111:       also have "\<dots> < r"
huffman@23111:         using n div_le_dividend by (rule N)
huffman@23111:       finally show "setsum ?f (?S1 n - ?S2 n) < r" .
huffman@23111:     qed
huffman@23111:   qed
huffman@36657:   hence "Zfun (\<lambda>n. setsum ?g (?S1 n - ?S2 n)) sequentially"
huffman@36657:     apply (rule Zfun_le [rule_format])
huffman@23111:     apply (simp only: norm_setsum_f)
huffman@23111:     apply (rule order_trans [OF norm_setsum setsum_mono])
huffman@23111:     apply (auto simp add: norm_mult_ineq)
huffman@23111:     done
huffman@23111:   hence 2: "(\<lambda>n. setsum ?g (?S1 n) - setsum ?g (?S2 n)) ----> 0"
huffman@36660:     unfolding tendsto_Zfun_iff diff_0_right
huffman@36657:     by (simp only: setsum_diff finite_S1 S2_le_S1)
huffman@23111: 
huffman@23111:   with 1 have "(\<lambda>n. setsum ?g (?S2 n)) ----> (\<Sum>k. a k) * (\<Sum>k. b k)"
huffman@23111:     by (rule LIMSEQ_diff_approach_zero2)
huffman@23111:   thus ?thesis by (simp only: sums_def setsum_triangle_reindex)
huffman@23111: qed
huffman@23111: 
huffman@23111: lemma Cauchy_product:
huffman@23111:   fixes a b :: "nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::{real_normed_algebra,banach}"
huffman@23111:   assumes a: "summable (\<lambda>k. norm (a k))"
huffman@23111:   assumes b: "summable (\<lambda>k. norm (b k))"
hoelzl@56213:   shows "(\<Sum>k. a k) * (\<Sum>k. b k) = (\<Sum>k. \<Sum>i\<le>k. a i * b (k - i))"
hoelzl@56213:   using a b
hoelzl@56213:   by (rule Cauchy_product_sums [THEN sums_unique])
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56213: subsection {* Series on @{typ real}s *}
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma summable_norm_comparison_test: "\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (f n) \<le> g n \<Longrightarrow> summable g \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. norm (f n))"
hoelzl@56213:   by (rule summable_comparison_test) auto
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma summable_rabs_comparison_test: "\<lbrakk>\<exists>N. \<forall>n\<ge>N. \<bar>f n\<bar> \<le> g n; summable g\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> summable (\<lambda>n. \<bar>f n :: real\<bar>)"
hoelzl@56213:   by (rule summable_comparison_test) auto
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma summable_rabs_cancel: "summable (\<lambda>n. \<bar>f n :: real\<bar>) \<Longrightarrow> summable f"
hoelzl@56213:   by (rule summable_norm_cancel) simp
hoelzl@56213: 
hoelzl@56213: lemma summable_rabs: "summable (\<lambda>n. \<bar>f n :: real\<bar>) \<Longrightarrow> \<bar>suminf f\<bar> \<le> (\<Sum>n. \<bar>f n\<bar>)"
hoelzl@56213:   by (fold real_norm_def) (rule summable_norm)
huffman@23111: 
paulson@14416: end