diff -r 000000000000 -r a5a9c433f639 src/FOL/simpdata.ML
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/src/FOL/simpdata.ML	Thu Sep 16 12:20:38 1993 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,114 @@
+(*  Title: 	FOL/simpdata
+    ID:         $Id$
+    Author: 	Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
+    Copyright   1991  University of Cambridge
+
+Simplification data for FOL
+*)
+
+(*** Rewrite rules ***)
+
+fun int_prove_fun s = 
+    (writeln s;  prove_goal IFOL.thy s
+       (fn prems => [ (cut_facts_tac prems 1), (Int.fast_tac 1) ]));
+
+val conj_rews = map int_prove_fun
+ ["P & True <-> P", 	"True & P <-> P",
+  "P & False <-> False", "False & P <-> False",
+  "P & P <-> P",
+  "P & ~P <-> False", 	"~P & P <-> False",
+  "(P & Q) & R <-> P & (Q & R)"];
+
+val disj_rews = map int_prove_fun
+ ["P | True <-> True", 	"True | P <-> True",
+  "P | False <-> P", 	"False | P <-> P",
+  "P | P <-> P",
+  "(P | Q) | R <-> P | (Q | R)"];
+
+val not_rews = map int_prove_fun
+ ["~ False <-> True",	"~ True <-> False"];
+
+val imp_rews = map int_prove_fun
+ ["(P --> False) <-> ~P",	"(P --> True) <-> True",
+  "(False --> P) <-> True",	"(True --> P) <-> P", 
+  "(P --> P) <-> True",		"(P --> ~P) <-> ~P"];
+
+val iff_rews = map int_prove_fun
+ ["(True <-> P) <-> P", 	"(P <-> True) <-> P",
+  "(P <-> P) <-> True",
+  "(False <-> P) <-> ~P", 	"(P <-> False) <-> ~P"];
+
+val quant_rews = map int_prove_fun
+ ["(ALL x.P) <-> P",	"(EX x.P) <-> P"];
+
+(*These are NOT supplied by default!*)
+val distrib_rews  = map int_prove_fun
+ ["~(P|Q) <-> ~P & ~Q",
+  "P & (Q | R) <-> P&Q | P&R", "(Q | R) & P <-> Q&P | R&P",
+  "(P | Q --> R) <-> (P --> R) & (Q --> R)"];
+
+val P_Imp_P_iff_T = int_prove_fun "P ==> (P <-> True)";
+
+fun make_iff_T th = th RS P_Imp_P_iff_T;
+
+val refl_iff_T = make_iff_T refl;
+
+val notFalseI = int_prove_fun "~False";
+
+(* Conversion into rewrite rules *)
+
+val not_P_imp_P_iff_F = int_prove_fun "~P ==> (P <-> False)";
+
+fun mk_meta_eq th = case concl_of th of
+      _ $ (Const("op <->",_)$_$_) => th RS iff_reflection
+    | _ $ (Const("op =",_)$_$_) => th RS eq_reflection
+    | _ $ (Const("Not",_)$_) => (th RS not_P_imp_P_iff_F) RS iff_reflection
+    | _ => (make_iff_T th) RS iff_reflection;
+
+fun atomize th = case concl_of th of (*The operator below is Trueprop*)
+      _ $ (Const("op -->",_) $ _ $ _) => atomize(th RS mp)
+    | _ $ (Const("op &",_) $ _ $ _) => atomize(th RS conjunct1) @
+				       atomize(th RS conjunct2)
+    | _ $ (Const("All",_) $ _) => atomize(th RS spec)
+    | _ $ (Const("True",_)) => []
+    | _ $ (Const("False",_)) => []
+    | _ => [th];
+
+fun mk_rew_rules th = map mk_meta_eq (atomize th);
+
+structure Induction = InductionFun(struct val spec=IFOL.spec end);
+
+val IFOL_rews =
+   [refl_iff_T] @ conj_rews @ disj_rews @ not_rews @ 
+    imp_rews @ iff_rews @ quant_rews;
+
+open Simplifier Induction;
+
+val IFOL_ss = empty_ss
+      setmksimps mk_rew_rules
+      setsolver
+        (fn prems => resolve_tac (TrueI::refl::iff_refl::notFalseI::prems))
+      setsubgoaler asm_simp_tac
+      addsimps IFOL_rews
+      addcongs [imp_cong RS iff_reflection];
+
+(*Classical version...*)
+fun prove_fun s = 
+    (writeln s;  prove_goal FOL.thy s
+       (fn prems => [ (cut_facts_tac prems 1), (Cla.fast_tac FOL_cs 1) ]));
+
+val cla_rews = map prove_fun
+ ["P | ~P", 		"~P | P",
+  "~ ~ P <-> P",	"(~P --> P) <-> P"];
+
+val FOL_ss = IFOL_ss addsimps cla_rews;
+
+(*** case splitting ***)
+
+val split_tac =
+  let val eq_reflection2 = prove_goal FOL.thy "x==y ==> x=y"
+                             (fn [prem] => [rewtac prem, rtac refl 1])
+      val iff_reflection2 = prove_goal FOL.thy "x==y ==> x<->y"
+                              (fn [prem] => [rewtac prem, rtac iff_refl 1])
+      val [iffD] = [eq_reflection2,iff_reflection2] RL [iffD2]
+  in fn splits => mk_case_split_tac iffD (map mk_meta_eq splits) end;