diff -r 000000000000 -r a5a9c433f639 src/ZF/indrule.ML
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/src/ZF/indrule.ML	Thu Sep 16 12:20:38 1993 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,162 @@
+(*  Title: 	ZF/indrule.ML
+    ID:         $Id$
+    Author: 	Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
+    Copyright   1993  University of Cambridge
+
+Induction rule module -- for Inductive/Coinductive Definitions
+
+Proves a strong induction rule and a mutual induction rule
+*)
+
+signature INDRULE =
+  sig
+  val induct        : thm			(*main induction rule*)
+  val mutual_induct : thm			(*mutual induction rule*)
+  end;
+
+
+functor Indrule_Fun (structure Ind: INDUCTIVE and 
+		     Pr: PR and Intr_elim: INTR_ELIM) : INDRULE  =
+struct
+open Logic Ind Intr_elim;
+
+val dummy = writeln "Proving the induction rules...";
+
+(*** Prove the main induction rule ***)
+
+val pred_name = "P";		(*name for predicate variables*)
+
+val prove = prove_term (sign_of Intr_elim.thy);
+
+val big_rec_def::part_rec_defs = Intr_elim.defs;
+
+(*Used to make induction rules;
+   ind_alist = [(rec_tm1,pred1),...]  -- associates predicates with rec ops
+   prem is a premise of an intr rule*)
+fun add_induct_prem ind_alist (prem as Const("Trueprop",_) $ 
+		 (Const("op :",_)$t$X), iprems) =
+     (case gen_assoc (op aconv) (ind_alist, X) of
+	  Some pred => prem :: mk_tprop (pred $ t) :: iprems
+	| None => (*possibly membership in M(rec_tm), for M monotone*)
+	    let fun mk_sb (rec_tm,pred) = (rec_tm, Collect_const$rec_tm$pred)
+	    in  subst_free (map mk_sb ind_alist) prem :: iprems  end)
+  | add_induct_prem ind_alist (prem,iprems) = prem :: iprems;
+
+(*Make a premise of the induction rule.*)
+fun induct_prem ind_alist intr =
+  let val quantfrees = map dest_Free (term_frees intr \\ rec_params)
+      val iprems = foldr (add_induct_prem ind_alist)
+			 (strip_imp_prems intr,[])
+      val (t,X) = rule_concl intr
+      val (Some pred) = gen_assoc (op aconv) (ind_alist, X)
+      val concl = mk_tprop (pred $ t)
+  in list_all_free (quantfrees, list_implies (iprems,concl)) end
+  handle Bind => error"Recursion term not found in conclusion";
+
+(*Avoids backtracking by delivering the correct premise to each goal*)
+fun ind_tac [] 0 = all_tac
+  | ind_tac(prem::prems) i = REPEAT (ares_tac [Part_eqI,prem] i) THEN
+			     ind_tac prems (i-1);
+
+val pred = Free(pred_name, iT-->oT);
+
+val ind_prems = map (induct_prem (map (rpair pred) rec_tms)) intr_tms;
+
+val quant_induct = 
+    prove part_rec_defs 
+      (list_implies (ind_prems, mk_tprop (mk_all_imp(big_rec_tm,pred))),
+       fn prems =>
+       [rtac (impI RS allI) 1,
+	etac raw_induct 1,
+	REPEAT (FIRSTGOAL (eresolve_tac [CollectE,exE,conjE,disjE,ssubst])),
+	REPEAT (FIRSTGOAL (eresolve_tac [PartE,CollectE])),
+	ind_tac (rev prems) (length prems) ]);
+
+(*** Prove the simultaneous induction rule ***)
+
+(*Make distinct predicates for each inductive set*)
+
+(*Sigmas and Cartesian products may nest ONLY to the right!*)
+fun mk_pred_typ (t $ A $ B) = 
+        if t = Pr.sigma  then  iT --> mk_pred_typ B
+                         else  iT --> oT
+  | mk_pred_typ _           =  iT --> oT
+
+(*Given a recursive set and its domain, return the "fsplit" predicate
+  and a conclusion for the simultaneous induction rule*)
+fun mk_predpair (rec_tm,domt) = 
+  let val rec_name = (#1 o dest_Const o head_of) rec_tm
+      val T = mk_pred_typ domt
+      val pfree = Free(pred_name ^ "_" ^ rec_name, T)
+      val frees = mk_frees "za" (binder_types T)
+      val qconcl = 
+	foldr mk_all (frees, 
+		      imp $ (mem_const $ foldr1 (app Pr.pair) frees $ rec_tm)
+			  $ (list_comb (pfree,frees)))
+  in  (ap_split Pr.fsplit_const pfree (binder_types T), 
+      qconcl)  
+  end;
+
+val (preds,qconcls) = split_list (map mk_predpair (rec_tms~~domts));
+
+(*Used to form simultaneous induction lemma*)
+fun mk_rec_imp (rec_tm,pred) = 
+    imp $ (mem_const $ Bound 0 $ rec_tm) $  (pred $ Bound 0);
+
+(*To instantiate the main induction rule*)
+val induct_concl = 
+ mk_tprop(mk_all_imp(big_rec_tm,
+		     Abs("z", iT, 
+			 fold_bal (app conj) 
+			          (map mk_rec_imp (rec_tms~~preds)))))
+and mutual_induct_concl = mk_tprop(fold_bal (app conj) qconcls);
+
+val lemma = (*makes the link between the two induction rules*)
+    prove part_rec_defs 
+	  (mk_implies (induct_concl,mutual_induct_concl), 
+	   fn prems =>
+	   [cut_facts_tac prems 1,
+	    REPEAT (eresolve_tac [asm_rl,conjE,PartE,mp] 1
+	     ORELSE resolve_tac [allI,impI,conjI,Part_eqI] 1
+	     ORELSE dresolve_tac [spec, mp, Pr.fsplitD] 1)]);
+
+(*Mutual induction follows by freeness of Inl/Inr.*)
+
+(*Removes Collects caused by M-operators in the intro rules*)
+val cmonos = [subset_refl RS Collect_mono] RL monos RLN (2,[rev_subsetD]);
+
+(*Avoids backtracking by delivering the correct premise to each goal*)
+fun mutual_ind_tac [] 0 = all_tac
+  | mutual_ind_tac(prem::prems) i = 
+      SELECT_GOAL 
+	((*unpackage and use "prem" in the corresponding place*)
+	 REPEAT (FIRSTGOAL
+		    (eresolve_tac ([conjE,mp]@cmonos) ORELSE'
+		     ares_tac [prem,impI,conjI]))
+	 (*prove remaining goals by contradiction*)
+	 THEN rewrite_goals_tac (con_defs@part_rec_defs)
+	 THEN REPEAT (eresolve_tac (PartE :: sumprod_free_SEs) 1))
+	i  THEN mutual_ind_tac prems (i-1);
+
+val mutual_induct_fsplit = 
+    prove []
+	  (list_implies (map (induct_prem (rec_tms~~preds)) intr_tms,
+			 mutual_induct_concl),
+	   fn prems =>
+	   [rtac (quant_induct RS lemma) 1,
+	    mutual_ind_tac (rev prems) (length prems)]);
+
+(*Attempts to remove all occurrences of fsplit*)
+val fsplit_tac =
+    REPEAT (SOMEGOAL (FIRST' [rtac Pr.fsplitI, 
+			      dtac Pr.fsplitD,
+			      etac Pr.fsplitE,
+			      bound_hyp_subst_tac]))
+    THEN prune_params_tac;
+
+(*strip quantifier*)
+val induct = standard (quant_induct RS spec RSN (2,rev_mp));
+
+val mutual_induct = rule_by_tactic fsplit_tac mutual_induct_fsplit;
+
+end;