diff -r fe5b796d6b2a -r 23b67731f4f0 src/HOL/HOLCF/IOA/meta_theory/Sequence.thy
--- a/src/HOL/HOLCF/IOA/meta_theory/Sequence.thy	Mon Mar 23 10:16:20 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/HOLCF/IOA/meta_theory/Sequence.thy	Mon Mar 23 13:30:59 2015 +0100
@@ -1081,7 +1081,7 @@
 ML {*
 
 fun Seq_case_tac ctxt s i =
-  Rule_Insts.res_inst_tac ctxt [((("x", 0), Position.none), s)] @{thm Seq_cases} i
+  Rule_Insts.res_inst_tac ctxt [((("x", 0), Position.none), s)] [] @{thm Seq_cases} i
   THEN hyp_subst_tac ctxt i THEN hyp_subst_tac ctxt (i+1) THEN hyp_subst_tac ctxt (i+2);
 
 (* on a>>s only simp_tac, as full_simp_tac is uncomplete and often causes errors *)
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@
 
 (* rws are definitions to be unfolded for admissibility check *)
 fun Seq_induct_tac ctxt s rws i =
-  Rule_Insts.res_inst_tac ctxt [((("x", 0), Position.none), s)] @{thm Seq_induct} i
+  Rule_Insts.res_inst_tac ctxt [((("x", 0), Position.none), s)] [] @{thm Seq_induct} i
   THEN (REPEAT_DETERM (CHANGED (asm_simp_tac ctxt (i+1))))
   THEN simp_tac (ctxt addsimps rws) i;
 
@@ -1102,12 +1102,12 @@
   THEN (REPEAT_DETERM (CHANGED (asm_simp_tac ctxt i)));
 
 fun pair_tac ctxt s =
-  Rule_Insts.res_inst_tac ctxt [((("p", 0), Position.none), s)] @{thm PairE}
+  Rule_Insts.res_inst_tac ctxt [((("p", 0), Position.none), s)] [] @{thm PairE}
   THEN' hyp_subst_tac ctxt THEN' asm_full_simp_tac ctxt;
 
 (* induction on a sequence of pairs with pairsplitting and simplification *)
 fun pair_induct_tac ctxt s rws i =
-  Rule_Insts.res_inst_tac ctxt [((("x", 0), Position.none), s)] @{thm Seq_induct} i
+  Rule_Insts.res_inst_tac ctxt [((("x", 0), Position.none), s)] [] @{thm Seq_induct} i
   THEN pair_tac ctxt "a" (i+3)
   THEN (REPEAT_DETERM (CHANGED (simp_tac ctxt (i+1))))
   THEN simp_tac (ctxt addsimps rws) i;