
diff -r bfc2e92d9b4c -r 261d42f0bfac src/HOL/Old_Number_Theory/Euler.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Old_Number_Theory/Euler.thy	Tue Oct 18 07:04:08 2016 +0200
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,303 +0,0 @@
-(*  Title:      HOL/Old_Number_Theory/Euler.thy
-    Authors:    Jeremy Avigad, David Gray, and Adam Kramer
-*)
-
-section \<open>Euler's criterion\<close>
-
-theory Euler
-imports Residues EvenOdd
-begin
-
-definition MultInvPair :: "int => int => int => int set"
-  where "MultInvPair a p j = {StandardRes p j, StandardRes p (a * (MultInv p j))}"
-
-definition SetS :: "int => int => int set set"
-  where "SetS a p = MultInvPair a p ` SRStar p"
-
-
-subsection \<open>Property for MultInvPair\<close>
-
-lemma MultInvPair_prop1a:
-  "[| zprime p; 2 < p; ~([a = 0](mod p));
-      X \<in> (SetS a p); Y \<in> (SetS a p);
-      ~((X \<inter> Y) = {}) |] ==> X = Y"
-  apply (auto simp add: SetS_def)
-  apply (drule StandardRes_SRStar_prop1a)+ defer 1
-  apply (drule StandardRes_SRStar_prop1a)+
-  apply (auto simp add: MultInvPair_def StandardRes_prop2 zcong_sym)
-  apply (drule notE, rule MultInv_zcong_prop1, auto)[]
-  apply (drule notE, rule MultInv_zcong_prop2, auto simp add: zcong_sym)[]
-  apply (drule MultInv_zcong_prop2, auto simp add: zcong_sym)[]
-  apply (drule MultInv_zcong_prop3, auto simp add: zcong_sym)[]
-  apply (drule MultInv_zcong_prop1, auto)[]
-  apply (drule MultInv_zcong_prop2, auto simp add: zcong_sym)[]
-  apply (drule MultInv_zcong_prop2, auto simp add: zcong_sym)[]
-  apply (drule MultInv_zcong_prop3, auto simp add: zcong_sym)[]
-  done
-
-lemma MultInvPair_prop1b:
-  "[| zprime p; 2 < p; ~([a = 0](mod p));
-      X \<in> (SetS a p); Y \<in> (SetS a p);
-      X \<noteq> Y |] ==> X \<inter> Y = {}"
-  apply (rule notnotD)
-  apply (rule notI)
-  apply (drule MultInvPair_prop1a, auto)
-  done
-
-lemma MultInvPair_prop1c: "[| zprime p; 2 < p; ~([a = 0](mod p)) |] ==>  
-    \<forall>X \<in> SetS a p. \<forall>Y \<in> SetS a p. X \<noteq> Y --> X\<inter>Y = {}"
-  by (auto simp add: MultInvPair_prop1b)
-
-lemma MultInvPair_prop2: "[| zprime p; 2 < p; ~([a = 0](mod p)) |] ==> 
-                          \<Union>(SetS a p) = SRStar p"
-  apply (auto simp add: SetS_def MultInvPair_def StandardRes_SRStar_prop4 
-    SRStar_mult_prop2)
-  apply (frule StandardRes_SRStar_prop3)
-  apply (rule bexI, auto)
-  done
-
-lemma MultInvPair_distinct:
-  assumes "zprime p" and "2 < p" and
-    "~([a = 0] (mod p))" and
-    "~([j = 0] (mod p))" and
-    "~(QuadRes p a)"
-  shows "~([j = a * MultInv p j] (mod p))"
-proof
-  assume "[j = a * MultInv p j] (mod p)"
-  then have "[j * j = (a * MultInv p j) * j] (mod p)"
-    by (auto simp add: zcong_scalar)
-  then have a:"[j * j = a * (MultInv p j * j)] (mod p)"
-    by (auto simp add: ac_simps)
-  have "[j * j = a] (mod p)"
-  proof -
-    from assms(1,2,4) have "[MultInv p j * j = 1] (mod p)"
-      by (simp add: MultInv_prop2a)
-    from this and a show ?thesis
-      by (auto simp add: zcong_zmult_prop2)
-  qed
-  then have "[j\<^sup>2 = a] (mod p)" by (simp add: power2_eq_square)
-  with assms show False by (simp add: QuadRes_def)
-qed
-
-lemma MultInvPair_card_two: "[| zprime p; 2 < p; ~([a = 0] (mod p)); 
-                                ~(QuadRes p a); ~([j = 0] (mod p)) |]  ==> 
-                             card (MultInvPair a p j) = 2"
-  apply (auto simp add: MultInvPair_def)
-  apply (subgoal_tac "~ (StandardRes p j = StandardRes p (a * MultInv p j))")
-  apply auto
-  apply (metis MultInvPair_distinct StandardRes_def aux)
-  done
-
-
-subsection \<open>Properties of SetS\<close>
-
-lemma SetS_finite: "2 < p ==> finite (SetS a p)"
-  by (auto simp add: SetS_def SRStar_finite [of p])
-
-lemma SetS_elems_finite: "\<forall>X \<in> SetS a p. finite X"
-  by (auto simp add: SetS_def MultInvPair_def)
-
-lemma SetS_elems_card: "[| zprime p; 2 < p; ~([a = 0] (mod p)); 
-                        ~(QuadRes p a) |]  ==>
-                        \<forall>X \<in> SetS a p. card X = 2"
-  apply (auto simp add: SetS_def)
-  apply (frule StandardRes_SRStar_prop1a)
-  apply (rule MultInvPair_card_two, auto)
-  done
-
-lemma Union_SetS_finite: "2 < p ==> finite (\<Union>(SetS a p))"
-  by (auto simp add: SetS_finite SetS_elems_finite)
-
-lemma card_sum_aux: "[| finite S; \<forall>X \<in> S. finite (X::int set); 
-    \<forall>X \<in> S. card X = n |] ==> sum card S = sum (%x. n) S"
-  by (induct set: finite) auto
-
-lemma SetS_card:
-  assumes "zprime p" and "2 < p" and "~([a = 0] (mod p))" and "~(QuadRes p a)"
-  shows "int(card(SetS a p)) = (p - 1) div 2"
-proof -
-  have "(p - 1) = 2 * int(card(SetS a p))"
-  proof -
-    have "p - 1 = int(card(\<Union>(SetS a p)))"
-      by (auto simp add: assms MultInvPair_prop2 SRStar_card)
-    also have "... = int (sum card (SetS a p))"
-      by (auto simp add: assms SetS_finite SetS_elems_finite
-        MultInvPair_prop1c [of p a] card_Union_disjoint)
-    also have "... = int(sum (%x.2) (SetS a p))"
-      using assms by (auto simp add: SetS_elems_card SetS_finite SetS_elems_finite
-        card_sum_aux simp del: sum_constant)
-    also have "... = 2 * int(card( SetS a p))"
-      by (auto simp add: assms SetS_finite sum_const2)
-    finally show ?thesis .
-  qed
-  then show ?thesis by auto
-qed
-
-lemma SetS_prod_prop: "[| zprime p; 2 < p; ~([a = 0] (mod p));
-                              ~(QuadRes p a); x \<in> (SetS a p) |] ==> 
-                          [\<Prod>x = a] (mod p)"
-  apply (auto simp add: SetS_def MultInvPair_def)
-  apply (frule StandardRes_SRStar_prop1a)
-  apply hypsubst_thin
-  apply (subgoal_tac "StandardRes p x \<noteq> StandardRes p (a * MultInv p x)")
-  apply (auto simp add: StandardRes_prop2 MultInvPair_distinct)
-  apply (frule_tac m = p and x = x and y = "(a * MultInv p x)" in 
-    StandardRes_prop4)
-  apply (subgoal_tac "[x * (a * MultInv p x) = a * (x * MultInv p x)] (mod p)")
-  apply (drule_tac a = "StandardRes p x * StandardRes p (a * MultInv p x)" and
-                   b = "x * (a * MultInv p x)" and
-                   c = "a * (x * MultInv p x)" in  zcong_trans, force)
-  apply (frule_tac p = p and x = x in MultInv_prop2, auto)
-apply (metis StandardRes_SRStar_prop3 mult_1_right mult.commute zcong_sym zcong_zmult_prop1)
-  apply (auto simp add: ac_simps)
-  done
-
-lemma aux1: "[| 0 < x; (x::int) < a; x \<noteq> (a - 1) |] ==> x < a - 1"
-  by arith
-
-lemma aux2: "[| (a::int) < c; b < c |] ==> (a \<le> b | b \<le> a)"
-  by auto
-
-lemma d22set_induct_old: "(\<And>a::int. 1 < a \<longrightarrow> P (a - 1) \<Longrightarrow> P a) \<Longrightarrow> P x"
-using d22set.induct by blast
-
-lemma SRStar_d22set_prop: "2 < p \<Longrightarrow> (SRStar p) = {1} \<union> (d22set (p - 1))"
-  apply (induct p rule: d22set_induct_old)
-  apply auto
-  apply (simp add: SRStar_def d22set.simps)
-  apply (simp add: SRStar_def d22set.simps, clarify)
-  apply (frule aux1)
-  apply (frule aux2, auto)
-  apply (simp_all add: SRStar_def)
-  apply (simp add: d22set.simps)
-  apply (frule d22set_le)
-  apply (frule d22set_g_1, auto)
-  done
-
-lemma Union_SetS_prod_prop1:
-  assumes "zprime p" and "2 < p" and "~([a = 0] (mod p))" and
-    "~(QuadRes p a)"
-  shows "[\<Prod>(\<Union>(SetS a p)) = a ^ nat ((p - 1) div 2)] (mod p)"
-proof -
-  from assms have "[\<Prod>(\<Union>(SetS a p)) = prod (prod (%x. x)) (SetS a p)] (mod p)"
-    by (auto simp add: SetS_finite SetS_elems_finite
-      MultInvPair_prop1c prod.Union_disjoint)
-  also have "[prod (prod (%x. x)) (SetS a p) = 
-      prod (%x. a) (SetS a p)] (mod p)"
-    by (rule prod_same_function_zcong)
-      (auto simp add: assms SetS_prod_prop SetS_finite)
-  also (zcong_trans) have "[prod (%x. a) (SetS a p) = 
-      a^(card (SetS a p))] (mod p)"
-    by (auto simp add: assms SetS_finite prod_constant)
-  finally (zcong_trans) show ?thesis
-    apply (rule zcong_trans)
-    apply (subgoal_tac "card(SetS a p) = nat((p - 1) div 2)", auto)
-    apply (subgoal_tac "nat(int(card(SetS a p))) = nat((p - 1) div 2)", force)
-    apply (auto simp add: assms SetS_card)
-    done
-qed
-
-lemma Union_SetS_prod_prop2:
-  assumes "zprime p" and "2 < p" and "~([a = 0](mod p))"
-  shows "\<Prod>(\<Union>(SetS a p)) = zfact (p - 1)"
-proof -
-  from assms have "\<Prod>(\<Union>(SetS a p)) = \<Prod>(SRStar p)"
-    by (auto simp add: MultInvPair_prop2)
-  also have "... = \<Prod>({1} \<union> (d22set (p - 1)))"
-    by (auto simp add: assms SRStar_d22set_prop)
-  also have "... = zfact(p - 1)"
-  proof -
-    have "~(1 \<in> d22set (p - 1)) & finite( d22set (p - 1))"
-      by (metis d22set_fin d22set_g_1 linorder_neq_iff)
-    then have "\<Prod>({1} \<union> (d22set (p - 1))) = \<Prod>(d22set (p - 1))"
-      by auto
-    then show ?thesis
-      by (auto simp add: d22set_prod_zfact)
-  qed
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma zfact_prop: "[| zprime p; 2 < p; ~([a = 0] (mod p)); ~(QuadRes p a) |] ==>
-                   [zfact (p - 1) = a ^ nat ((p - 1) div 2)] (mod p)"
-  apply (frule Union_SetS_prod_prop1) 
-  apply (auto simp add: Union_SetS_prod_prop2)
-  done
-
-text \<open>\medskip Prove the first part of Euler's Criterion:\<close>
-
-lemma Euler_part1: "[| 2 < p; zprime p; ~([x = 0](mod p)); 
-    ~(QuadRes p x) |] ==> 
-      [x^(nat (((p) - 1) div 2)) = -1](mod p)"
-  by (metis Wilson_Russ zcong_sym zcong_trans zfact_prop)
-
-text \<open>\medskip Prove another part of Euler Criterion:\<close>
-
-lemma aux_1: "0 < p ==> (a::int) ^ nat (p) = a * a ^ (nat (p) - 1)"
-proof -
-  assume "0 < p"
-  then have "a ^ (nat p) =  a ^ (1 + (nat p - 1))"
-    by (auto simp add: diff_add_assoc)
-  also have "... = (a ^ 1) * a ^ (nat(p) - 1)"
-    by (simp only: power_add)
-  also have "... = a * a ^ (nat(p) - 1)"
-    by auto
-  finally show ?thesis .
-qed
-
-lemma aux_2: "[| (2::int) < p; p \<in> zOdd |] ==> 0 < ((p - 1) div 2)"
-proof -
-  assume "2 < p" and "p \<in> zOdd"
-  then have "(p - 1):zEven"
-    by (auto simp add: zEven_def zOdd_def)
-  then have aux_1: "2 * ((p - 1) div 2) = (p - 1)"
-    by (auto simp add: even_div_2_prop2)
-  with \<open>2 < p\<close> have "1 < (p - 1)"
-    by auto
-  then have " 1 < (2 * ((p - 1) div 2))"
-    by (auto simp add: aux_1)
-  then have "0 < (2 * ((p - 1) div 2)) div 2"
-    by auto
-  then show ?thesis by auto
-qed
-
-lemma Euler_part2:
-    "[| 2 < p; zprime p; [a = 0] (mod p) |] ==> [0 = a ^ nat ((p - 1) div 2)] (mod p)"
-  apply (frule zprime_zOdd_eq_grt_2)
-  apply (frule aux_2, auto)
-  apply (frule_tac a = a in aux_1, auto)
-  apply (frule zcong_zmult_prop1, auto)
-  done
-
-text \<open>\medskip Prove the final part of Euler's Criterion:\<close>
-
-lemma aux__1: "[| ~([x = 0] (mod p)); [y\<^sup>2 = x] (mod p)|] ==> ~(p dvd y)"
-  by (metis dvdI power2_eq_square zcong_sym zcong_trans zcong_zero_equiv_div dvd_trans)
-
-lemma aux__2: "2 * nat((p - 1) div 2) =  nat (2 * ((p - 1) div 2))"
-  by (auto simp add: nat_mult_distrib)
-
-lemma Euler_part3: "[| 2 < p; zprime p; ~([x = 0](mod p)); QuadRes p x |] ==> 
-                      [x^(nat (((p) - 1) div 2)) = 1](mod p)"
-  apply (subgoal_tac "p \<in> zOdd")
-  apply (auto simp add: QuadRes_def)
-   prefer 2 
-   apply (metis zprime_zOdd_eq_grt_2)
-  apply (frule aux__1, auto)
-  apply (drule_tac z = "nat ((p - 1) div 2)" in zcong_zpower)
-  apply (auto simp add: power_mult [symmetric]) 
-  apply (rule zcong_trans)
-  apply (auto simp add: zcong_sym [of "x ^ nat ((p - 1) div 2)"])
-  apply (metis Little_Fermat even_div_2_prop2 odd_minus_one_even mult_1 aux__2)
-  done
-
-
-text \<open>\medskip Finally show Euler's Criterion:\<close>
-
-theorem Euler_Criterion: "[| 2 < p; zprime p |] ==> [(Legendre a p) =
-    a^(nat (((p) - 1) div 2))] (mod p)"
-  apply (auto simp add: Legendre_def Euler_part2)
-  apply (frule Euler_part3, auto simp add: zcong_sym)[]
-  apply (frule Euler_part1, auto simp add: zcong_sym)[]
-  done
-
-end




