
diff -r 0c86acc069ad -r 5deda0549f97 doc-src/TutorialI/Inductive/document/Even.tex
--- a/doc-src/TutorialI/Inductive/document/Even.tex	Thu Jul 26 16:54:44 2012 +0200
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,543 +0,0 @@
-%
-\begin{isabellebody}%
-\def\isabellecontext{Even}%
-%
-\isadelimtheory
-%
-\endisadelimtheory
-%
-\isatagtheory
-%
-\endisatagtheory
-{\isafoldtheory}%
-%
-\isadelimtheory
-%
-\endisadelimtheory
-%
-\isadelimML
-%
-\endisadelimML
-%
-\isatagML
-%
-\endisatagML
-{\isafoldML}%
-%
-\isadelimML
-%
-\endisadelimML
-%
-\isamarkupsection{The Set of Even Numbers%
-}
-\isamarkuptrue%
-%
-\begin{isamarkuptext}%
-\index{even numbers!defining inductively|(}%
-The set of even numbers can be inductively defined as the least set
-containing 0 and closed under the operation $+2$.  Obviously,
-\emph{even} can also be expressed using the divides relation (\isa{dvd}). 
-We shall prove below that the two formulations coincide.  On the way we
-shall examine the primary means of reasoning about inductively defined
-sets: rule induction.%
-\end{isamarkuptext}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-%
-\isamarkupsubsection{Making an Inductive Definition%
-}
-\isamarkuptrue%
-%
-\begin{isamarkuptext}%
-Using \commdx{inductive\protect\_set}, we declare the constant \isa{even} to be
-a set of natural numbers with the desired properties.%
-\end{isamarkuptext}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-\isacommand{inductive{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}set}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ even\ {\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}nat\ set{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}\ \isakeyword{where}\isanewline
-zero{\isaliteral{5B}{\isacharbrackleft}}intro{\isaliteral{21}{\isacharbang}}{\isaliteral{5D}{\isacharbrackright}}{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}{\isadigit{0}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}\ {\isaliteral{7C}{\isacharbar}}\isanewline
-step{\isaliteral{5B}{\isacharbrackleft}}intro{\isaliteral{21}{\isacharbang}}{\isaliteral{5D}{\isacharbrackright}}{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}%
-\begin{isamarkuptext}%
-An inductive definition consists of introduction rules.  The first one
-above states that 0 is even; the second states that if $n$ is even, then so
-is~$n+2$.  Given this declaration, Isabelle generates a fixed point
-definition for \isa{even} and proves theorems about it,
-thus following the definitional approach (see {\S}\ref{sec:definitional}).
-These theorems
-include the introduction rules specified in the declaration, an elimination
-rule for case analysis and an induction rule.  We can refer to these
-theorems by automatically-generated names.  Here are two examples:
-\begin{isabelle}%
-{\isadigit{0}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even\rulename{even{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}zero}\par\smallskip%
-n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even\rulename{even{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}step}%
-\end{isabelle}
-
-The introduction rules can be given attributes.  Here
-both rules are specified as \isa{intro!},%
-\index{intro"!@\isa {intro"!} (attribute)}
-directing the classical reasoner to 
-apply them aggressively. Obviously, regarding 0 as even is safe.  The
-\isa{step} rule is also safe because $n+2$ is even if and only if $n$ is
-even.  We prove this equivalence later.%
-\end{isamarkuptext}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-%
-\isamarkupsubsection{Using Introduction Rules%
-}
-\isamarkuptrue%
-%
-\begin{isamarkuptext}%
-Our first lemma states that numbers of the form $2\times k$ are even.
-Introduction rules are used to show that specific values belong to the
-inductive set.  Such proofs typically involve 
-induction, perhaps over some other inductive set.%
-\end{isamarkuptext}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-\isacommand{lemma}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ two{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}times{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}even{\isaliteral{5B}{\isacharbrackleft}}intro{\isaliteral{21}{\isacharbang}}{\isaliteral{5D}{\isacharbrackright}}{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}{\isadigit{2}}{\isaliteral{2A}{\isacharasterisk}}k\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}\isanewline
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isatagproof
-\isacommand{apply}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}induct{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}tac\ k{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\isanewline
-\ \isacommand{apply}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ auto\isanewline
-\isacommand{done}\isamarkupfalse%
-%
-\endisatagproof
-{\isafoldproof}%
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isatagproof
-%
-\begin{isamarkuptxt}%
-\noindent
-The first step is induction on the natural number \isa{k}, which leaves
-two subgoals:
-\begin{isabelle}%
-\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isadigit{2}}\ {\isaliteral{2A}{\isacharasterisk}}\ {\isadigit{0}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even\isanewline
-\ {\isadigit{2}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C416E643E}{\isasymAnd}}n{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isadigit{2}}\ {\isaliteral{2A}{\isacharasterisk}}\ n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ {\isadigit{2}}\ {\isaliteral{2A}{\isacharasterisk}}\ Suc\ n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even%
-\end{isabelle}
-Here \isa{auto} simplifies both subgoals so that they match the introduction
-rules, which are then applied automatically.
-
-Our ultimate goal is to prove the equivalence between the traditional
-definition of \isa{even} (using the divides relation) and our inductive
-definition.  One direction of this equivalence is immediate by the lemma
-just proved, whose \isa{intro{\isaliteral{21}{\isacharbang}}} attribute ensures it is applied automatically.%
-\end{isamarkuptxt}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-%
-\endisatagproof
-{\isafoldproof}%
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-\isacommand{lemma}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ dvd{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}imp{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}even{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}{\isadigit{2}}\ dvd\ n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}\isanewline
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isatagproof
-\isacommand{by}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}auto\ simp\ add{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ dvd{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}def{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}%
-\endisatagproof
-{\isafoldproof}%
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isamarkupsubsection{Rule Induction \label{sec:rule-induction}%
-}
-\isamarkuptrue%
-%
-\begin{isamarkuptext}%
-\index{rule induction|(}%
-From the definition of the set
-\isa{even}, Isabelle has
-generated an induction rule:
-\begin{isabelle}%
-{\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}x\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ P\ {\isadigit{0}}{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\isanewline
-\isaindent{\ }{\isaliteral{5C3C416E643E}{\isasymAnd}}n{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ P\ n{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ P\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\isanewline
-{\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ P\ x\rulename{even{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}induct}%
-\end{isabelle}
-A property \isa{P} holds for every even number provided it
-holds for~\isa{{\isadigit{0}}} and is closed under the operation
-\isa{Suc(Suc \(\cdot\))}.  Then \isa{P} is closed under the introduction
-rules for \isa{even}, which is the least set closed under those rules. 
-This type of inductive argument is called \textbf{rule induction}. 
-
-Apart from the double application of \isa{Suc}, the induction rule above
-resembles the familiar mathematical induction, which indeed is an instance
-of rule induction; the natural numbers can be defined inductively to be
-the least set containing \isa{{\isadigit{0}}} and closed under~\isa{Suc}.
-
-Induction is the usual way of proving a property of the elements of an
-inductively defined set.  Let us prove that all members of the set
-\isa{even} are multiples of two.%
-\end{isamarkuptext}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-\isacommand{lemma}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ even{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}imp{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}dvd{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ {\isadigit{2}}\ dvd\ n{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isatagproof
-%
-\begin{isamarkuptxt}%
-We begin by applying induction.  Note that \isa{even{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}induct} has the form
-of an elimination rule, so we use the method \isa{erule}.  We get two
-subgoals:%
-\end{isamarkuptxt}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-\isacommand{apply}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}erule\ even{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}induct{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}%
-\begin{isamarkuptxt}%
-\begin{isabelle}%
-\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isadigit{2}}\ dvd\ {\isadigit{0}}\isanewline
-\ {\isadigit{2}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C416E643E}{\isasymAnd}}n{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ {\isadigit{2}}\ dvd\ n{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ {\isadigit{2}}\ dvd\ Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}%
-\end{isabelle}
-We unfold the definition of \isa{dvd} in both subgoals, proving the first
-one and simplifying the second:%
-\end{isamarkuptxt}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-\isacommand{apply}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}simp{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}all\ add{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ dvd{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}def{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}%
-\begin{isamarkuptxt}%
-\begin{isabelle}%
-\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C416E643E}{\isasymAnd}}n{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6578697374733E}{\isasymexists}}k{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ n\ {\isaliteral{3D}{\isacharequal}}\ {\isadigit{2}}\ {\isaliteral{2A}{\isacharasterisk}}\ k{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6578697374733E}{\isasymexists}}k{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{3D}{\isacharequal}}\ {\isadigit{2}}\ {\isaliteral{2A}{\isacharasterisk}}\ k%
-\end{isabelle}
-The next command eliminates the existential quantifier from the assumption
-and replaces \isa{n} by \isa{{\isadigit{2}}\ {\isaliteral{2A}{\isacharasterisk}}\ k}.%
-\end{isamarkuptxt}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-\isacommand{apply}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ clarify%
-\begin{isamarkuptxt}%
-\begin{isabelle}%
-\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C416E643E}{\isasymAnd}}n\ k{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isadigit{2}}\ {\isaliteral{2A}{\isacharasterisk}}\ k\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6578697374733E}{\isasymexists}}ka{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}{\isadigit{2}}\ {\isaliteral{2A}{\isacharasterisk}}\ k{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{3D}{\isacharequal}}\ {\isadigit{2}}\ {\isaliteral{2A}{\isacharasterisk}}\ ka%
-\end{isabelle}
-To conclude, we tell Isabelle that the desired value is
-\isa{Suc\ k}.  With this hint, the subgoal falls to \isa{simp}.%
-\end{isamarkuptxt}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-\isacommand{apply}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}rule{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}tac\ x\ {\isaliteral{3D}{\isacharequal}}\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}Suc\ k{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}\ \isakeyword{in}\ exI{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ simp{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}%
-\endisatagproof
-{\isafoldproof}%
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\begin{isamarkuptext}%
-Combining the previous two results yields our objective, the
-equivalence relating \isa{even} and \isa{dvd}. 
-%
-%we don't want [iff]: discuss?%
-\end{isamarkuptext}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-\isacommand{theorem}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ even{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}iff{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}dvd{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}{\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{3D}{\isacharequal}}\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}{\isadigit{2}}\ dvd\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}\isanewline
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isatagproof
-\isacommand{by}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}blast\ intro{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ dvd{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}imp{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}even\ even{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}imp{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}dvd{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}%
-\endisatagproof
-{\isafoldproof}%
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isamarkupsubsection{Generalization and Rule Induction \label{sec:gen-rule-induction}%
-}
-\isamarkuptrue%
-%
-\begin{isamarkuptext}%
-\index{generalizing for induction}%
-Before applying induction, we typically must generalize
-the induction formula.  With rule induction, the required generalization
-can be hard to find and sometimes requires a complete reformulation of the
-problem.  In this  example, our first attempt uses the obvious statement of
-the result.  It fails:%
-\end{isamarkuptext}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-\isacommand{lemma}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}\isanewline
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isatagproof
-\isacommand{apply}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}erule\ even{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}induct{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\isanewline
-\isacommand{oops}\isamarkupfalse%
-%
-\endisatagproof
-{\isafoldproof}%
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isatagproof
-%
-\begin{isamarkuptxt}%
-Rule induction finds no occurrences of \isa{Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}} in the
-conclusion, which it therefore leaves unchanged.  (Look at
-\isa{even{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}induct} to see why this happens.)  We have these subgoals:
-\begin{isabelle}%
-\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even\isanewline
-\ {\isadigit{2}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C416E643E}{\isasymAnd}}na{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}na\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even%
-\end{isabelle}
-The first one is hopeless.  Rule induction on
-a non-variable term discards information, and usually fails.
-How to deal with such situations
-in general is described in {\S}\ref{sec:ind-var-in-prems} below.
-In the current case the solution is easy because
-we have the necessary inverse, subtraction:%
-\end{isamarkuptxt}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-%
-\endisatagproof
-{\isafoldproof}%
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-\isacommand{lemma}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ even{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}imp{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}even{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}minus{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}{\isadigit{2}}{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ n\ {\isaliteral{2D}{\isacharminus}}\ {\isadigit{2}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}\isanewline
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isatagproof
-\isacommand{apply}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}erule\ even{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}induct{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\isanewline
-\ \isacommand{apply}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ auto\isanewline
-\isacommand{done}\isamarkupfalse%
-%
-\endisatagproof
-{\isafoldproof}%
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isatagproof
-%
-\begin{isamarkuptxt}%
-This lemma is trivially inductive.  Here are the subgoals:
-\begin{isabelle}%
-\ {\isadigit{1}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isadigit{0}}\ {\isaliteral{2D}{\isacharminus}}\ {\isadigit{2}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even\isanewline
-\ {\isadigit{2}}{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C416E643E}{\isasymAnd}}n{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ n\ {\isaliteral{2D}{\isacharminus}}\ {\isadigit{2}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{2D}{\isacharminus}}\ {\isadigit{2}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even%
-\end{isabelle}
-The first is trivial because \isa{{\isadigit{0}}\ {\isaliteral{2D}{\isacharminus}}\ {\isadigit{2}}} simplifies to \isa{{\isadigit{0}}}, which is
-even.  The second is trivial too: \isa{Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{2D}{\isacharminus}}\ {\isadigit{2}}} simplifies to
-\isa{n}, matching the assumption.%
-\index{rule induction|)}  %the sequel isn't really about induction
-
-\medskip
-Using our lemma, we can easily prove the result we originally wanted:%
-\end{isamarkuptxt}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-%
-\endisatagproof
-{\isafoldproof}%
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-\isacommand{lemma}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ Suc{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}Suc{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}even{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}imp{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}even{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}\isanewline
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isatagproof
-\isacommand{by}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}drule\ even{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}imp{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}even{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}minus{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}{\isadigit{2}}{\isaliteral{2C}{\isacharcomma}}\ simp{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}%
-\endisatagproof
-{\isafoldproof}%
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\begin{isamarkuptext}%
-We have just proved the converse of the introduction rule \isa{even{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}step}.
-This suggests proving the following equivalence.  We give it the
-\attrdx{iff} attribute because of its obvious value for simplification.%
-\end{isamarkuptext}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-\isacommand{lemma}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ {\isaliteral{5B}{\isacharbrackleft}}iff{\isaliteral{5D}{\isacharbrackright}}{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}{\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}{\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{3D}{\isacharequal}}\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}\isanewline
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isatagproof
-\isacommand{by}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}blast\ dest{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ Suc{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}Suc{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}even{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}imp{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}even{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}%
-\endisatagproof
-{\isafoldproof}%
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isamarkupsubsection{Rule Inversion \label{sec:rule-inversion}%
-}
-\isamarkuptrue%
-%
-\begin{isamarkuptext}%
-\index{rule inversion|(}%
-Case analysis on an inductive definition is called \textbf{rule
-inversion}.  It is frequently used in proofs about operational
-semantics.  It can be highly effective when it is applied
-automatically.  Let us look at how rule inversion is done in
-Isabelle/HOL\@.
-
-Recall that \isa{even} is the minimal set closed under these two rules:
-\begin{isabelle}%
-{\isadigit{0}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even\isasep\isanewline%
-n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even%
-\end{isabelle}
-Minimality means that \isa{even} contains only the elements that these
-rules force it to contain.  If we are told that \isa{a}
-belongs to
-\isa{even} then there are only two possibilities.  Either \isa{a} is \isa{{\isadigit{0}}}
-or else \isa{a} has the form \isa{Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}}, for some suitable \isa{n}
-that belongs to
-\isa{even}.  That is the gist of the \isa{cases} rule, which Isabelle proves
-for us when it accepts an inductive definition:
-\begin{isabelle}%
-{\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}a\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ a\ {\isaliteral{3D}{\isacharequal}}\ {\isadigit{0}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ P{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\isanewline
-\isaindent{\ }{\isaliteral{5C3C416E643E}{\isasymAnd}}n{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}a\ {\isaliteral{3D}{\isacharequal}}\ Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ P{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\isanewline
-{\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ P\rulename{even{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}cases}%
-\end{isabelle}
-This general rule is less useful than instances of it for
-specific patterns.  For example, if \isa{a} has the form
-\isa{Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}} then the first case becomes irrelevant, while the second
-case tells us that \isa{n} belongs to \isa{even}.  Isabelle will generate
-this instance for us:%
-\end{isamarkuptext}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-\isacommand{inductive{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}cases}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ Suc{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}Suc{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}cases\ {\isaliteral{5B}{\isacharbrackleft}}elim{\isaliteral{21}{\isacharbang}}{\isaliteral{5D}{\isacharbrackright}}{\isaliteral{3A}{\isacharcolon}}\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}Suc{\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}%
-\begin{isamarkuptext}%
-The \commdx{inductive\protect\_cases} command generates an instance of
-the \isa{cases} rule for the supplied pattern and gives it the supplied name:
-\begin{isabelle}%
-{\isaliteral{5C3C6C6272616B6B3E}{\isasymlbrakk}}Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{3B}{\isacharsemicolon}}\ n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ P{\isaliteral{5C3C726272616B6B3E}{\isasymrbrakk}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ P\rulename{Suc{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}Suc{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}cases}%
-\end{isabelle}
-Applying this as an elimination rule yields one case where \isa{even{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}cases}
-would yield two.  Rule inversion works well when the conclusions of the
-introduction rules involve datatype constructors like \isa{Suc} and \isa{{\isaliteral{23}{\isacharhash}}}
-(list ``cons''); freeness reasoning discards all but one or two cases.
-
-In the \isacommand{inductive\_cases} command we supplied an
-attribute, \isa{elim{\isaliteral{21}{\isacharbang}}},
-\index{elim"!@\isa {elim"!} (attribute)}%
-indicating that this elimination rule can be
-applied aggressively.  The original
-\isa{cases} rule would loop if used in that manner because the
-pattern~\isa{a} matches everything.
-
-The rule \isa{Suc{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}Suc{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}cases} is equivalent to the following implication:
-\begin{isabelle}%
-Suc\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even\ {\isaliteral{5C3C4C6F6E6772696768746172726F773E}{\isasymLongrightarrow}}\ n\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even%
-\end{isabelle}
-Just above we devoted some effort to reaching precisely
-this result.  Yet we could have obtained it by a one-line declaration,
-dispensing with the lemma \isa{even{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}imp{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}even{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}minus{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}{\isadigit{2}}}. 
-This example also justifies the terminology
-\textbf{rule inversion}: the new rule inverts the introduction rule
-\isa{even{\isaliteral{2E}{\isachardot}}step}.  In general, a rule can be inverted when the set of elements
-it introduces is disjoint from those of the other introduction rules.
-
-For one-off applications of rule inversion, use the \methdx{ind_cases} method. 
-Here is an example:%
-\end{isamarkuptext}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\isatagproof
-\isacommand{apply}\isamarkupfalse%
-\ {\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}ind{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}cases\ {\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteopen}}Suc{\isaliteral{28}{\isacharparenleft}}Suc\ n{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}\ {\isaliteral{5C3C696E3E}{\isasymin}}\ even{\isaliteral{22}{\isachardoublequoteclose}}{\isaliteral{29}{\isacharparenright}}%
-\endisatagproof
-{\isafoldproof}%
-%
-\isadelimproof
-%
-\endisadelimproof
-%
-\begin{isamarkuptext}%
-The specified instance of the \isa{cases} rule is generated, then applied
-as an elimination rule.
-
-To summarize, every inductive definition produces a \isa{cases} rule.  The
-\commdx{inductive\protect\_cases} command stores an instance of the
-\isa{cases} rule for a given pattern.  Within a proof, the
-\isa{ind{\isaliteral{5F}{\isacharunderscore}}cases} method applies an instance of the \isa{cases}
-rule.
-
-The even numbers example has shown how inductive definitions can be
-used.  Later examples will show that they are actually worth using.%
-\index{rule inversion|)}%
-\index{even numbers!defining inductively|)}%
-\end{isamarkuptext}%
-\isamarkuptrue%
-%
-\isadelimtheory
-%
-\endisadelimtheory
-%
-\isatagtheory
-%
-\endisatagtheory
-{\isafoldtheory}%
-%
-\isadelimtheory
-%
-\endisadelimtheory
-\end{isabellebody}%
-%%% Local Variables:
-%%% mode: latex
-%%% TeX-master: "root"
-%%% End:




