
diff -r 44ce6b524ff3 -r 6ddb43c6b711 src/HOL/Multivariate_Analysis/Regularity.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Multivariate_Analysis/Regularity.thy	Fri Aug 05 18:34:57 2016 +0200
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,383 +0,0 @@
-(*  Title:      HOL/Probability/Regularity.thy
-    Author:     Fabian Immler, TU München
-*)
-
-section \<open>Regularity of Measures\<close>
-
-theory Regularity
-imports Measure_Space Borel_Space
-begin
-
-lemma
-  fixes M::"'a::{second_countable_topology, complete_space} measure"
-  assumes sb: "sets M = sets borel"
-  assumes "emeasure M (space M) \<noteq> \<infinity>"
-  assumes "B \<in> sets borel"
-  shows inner_regular: "emeasure M B =
-    (SUP K : {K. K \<subseteq> B \<and> compact K}. emeasure M K)" (is "?inner B")
-  and outer_regular: "emeasure M B =
-    (INF U : {U. B \<subseteq> U \<and> open U}. emeasure M U)" (is "?outer B")
-proof -
-  have Us: "UNIV = space M" by (metis assms(1) sets_eq_imp_space_eq space_borel)
-  hence sU: "space M = UNIV" by simp
-  interpret finite_measure M by rule fact
-  have approx_inner: "\<And>A. A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow>
-    (\<And>e. e > 0 \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>K. K \<subseteq> A \<and> compact K \<and> emeasure M A \<le> emeasure M K + ennreal e) \<Longrightarrow> ?inner A"
-    by (rule ennreal_approx_SUP)
-      (force intro!: emeasure_mono simp: compact_imp_closed emeasure_eq_measure)+
-  have approx_outer: "\<And>A. A \<in> sets M \<Longrightarrow>
-    (\<And>e. e > 0 \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>B. A \<subseteq> B \<and> open B \<and> emeasure M B \<le> emeasure M A + ennreal e) \<Longrightarrow> ?outer A"
-    by (rule ennreal_approx_INF)
-       (force intro!: emeasure_mono simp: emeasure_eq_measure sb)+
-  from countable_dense_setE guess X::"'a set"  . note X = this
-  {
-    fix r::real assume "r > 0" hence "\<And>y. open (ball y r)" "\<And>y. ball y r \<noteq> {}" by auto
-    with X(2)[OF this]
-    have x: "space M = (\<Union>x\<in>X. cball x r)"
-      by (auto simp add: sU) (metis dist_commute order_less_imp_le)
-    let ?U = "\<Union>k. (\<Union>n\<in>{0..k}. cball (from_nat_into X n) r)"
-    have "(\<lambda>k. emeasure M (\<Union>n\<in>{0..k}. cball (from_nat_into X n) r)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> M ?U"
-      by (rule Lim_emeasure_incseq) (auto intro!: borel_closed bexI simp: incseq_def Us sb)
-    also have "?U = space M"
-    proof safe
-      fix x from X(2)[OF open_ball[of x r]] \<open>r > 0\<close> obtain d where d: "d\<in>X" "d \<in> ball x r" by auto
-      show "x \<in> ?U"
-        using X(1) d
-        by simp (auto intro!: exI [where x = "to_nat_on X d"] simp: dist_commute Bex_def)
-    qed (simp add: sU)
-    finally have "(\<lambda>k. M (\<Union>n\<in>{0..k}. cball (from_nat_into X n) r)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> M (space M)" .
-  } note M_space = this
-  {
-    fix e ::real and n :: nat assume "e > 0" "n > 0"
-    hence "1/n > 0" "e * 2 powr - n > 0" by (auto)
-    from M_space[OF \<open>1/n>0\<close>]
-    have "(\<lambda>k. measure M (\<Union>i\<in>{0..k}. cball (from_nat_into X i) (1/real n))) \<longlonglongrightarrow> measure M (space M)"
-      unfolding emeasure_eq_measure by (auto simp: measure_nonneg)
-    from metric_LIMSEQ_D[OF this \<open>0 < e * 2 powr -n\<close>]
-    obtain k where "dist (measure M (\<Union>i\<in>{0..k}. cball (from_nat_into X i) (1/real n))) (measure M (space M)) <
-      e * 2 powr -n"
-      by auto
-    hence "measure M (\<Union>i\<in>{0..k}. cball (from_nat_into X i) (1/real n)) \<ge>
-      measure M (space M) - e * 2 powr -real n"
-      by (auto simp: dist_real_def)
-    hence "\<exists>k. measure M (\<Union>i\<in>{0..k}. cball (from_nat_into X i) (1/real n)) \<ge>
-      measure M (space M) - e * 2 powr - real n" ..
-  } note k=this
-  hence "\<forall>e\<in>{0<..}. \<forall>(n::nat)\<in>{0<..}. \<exists>k.
-    measure M (\<Union>i\<in>{0..k}. cball (from_nat_into X i) (1/real n)) \<ge> measure M (space M) - e * 2 powr - real n"
-    by blast
-  then obtain k where k: "\<forall>e\<in>{0<..}. \<forall>n\<in>{0<..}. measure M (space M) - e * 2 powr - real (n::nat)
-    \<le> measure M (\<Union>i\<in>{0..k e n}. cball (from_nat_into X i) (1 / n))"
-    by metis
-  hence k: "\<And>e n. e > 0 \<Longrightarrow> n > 0 \<Longrightarrow> measure M (space M) - e * 2 powr - n
-    \<le> measure M (\<Union>i\<in>{0..k e n}. cball (from_nat_into X i) (1 / n))"
-    unfolding Ball_def by blast
-  have approx_space:
-    "\<exists>K \<in> {K. K \<subseteq> space M \<and> compact K}. emeasure M (space M) \<le> emeasure M K + ennreal e"
-    (is "?thesis e") if "0 < e" for e :: real
-  proof -
-    define B where [abs_def]:
-      "B n = (\<Union>i\<in>{0..k e (Suc n)}. cball (from_nat_into X i) (1 / Suc n))" for n
-    have "\<And>n. closed (B n)" by (auto simp: B_def)
-    hence [simp]: "\<And>n. B n \<in> sets M" by (simp add: sb)
-    from k[OF \<open>e > 0\<close> zero_less_Suc]
-    have "\<And>n. measure M (space M) - measure M (B n) \<le> e * 2 powr - real (Suc n)"
-      by (simp add: algebra_simps B_def finite_measure_compl)
-    hence B_compl_le: "\<And>n::nat. measure M (space M - B n) \<le> e * 2 powr - real (Suc n)"
-      by (simp add: finite_measure_compl)
-    define K where "K = (\<Inter>n. B n)"
-    from \<open>closed (B _)\<close> have "closed K" by (auto simp: K_def)
-    hence [simp]: "K \<in> sets M" by (simp add: sb)
-    have "measure M (space M) - measure M K = measure M (space M - K)"
-      by (simp add: finite_measure_compl)
-    also have "\<dots> = emeasure M (\<Union>n. space M - B n)" by (auto simp: K_def emeasure_eq_measure)
-    also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<Sum>n. emeasure M (space M - B n))"
-      by (rule emeasure_subadditive_countably) (auto simp: summable_def)
-    also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<Sum>n. ennreal (e*2 powr - real (Suc n)))"
-      using B_compl_le by (intro suminf_le) (simp_all add: measure_nonneg emeasure_eq_measure ennreal_leI)
-    also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<Sum>n. ennreal (e * (1 / 2) ^ Suc n))"
-      by (simp add: powr_minus powr_realpow field_simps del: of_nat_Suc)
-    also have "\<dots> = ennreal e * (\<Sum>n. ennreal ((1 / 2) ^ Suc n))"
-      unfolding ennreal_power[symmetric]
-      using \<open>0 < e\<close>
-      by (simp add: ac_simps ennreal_mult' divide_ennreal[symmetric] divide_ennreal_def
-                    ennreal_power[symmetric])
-    also have "\<dots> = e"
-      by (subst suminf_ennreal_eq[OF zero_le_power power_half_series]) auto
-    finally have "measure M (space M) \<le> measure M K + e"
-      using \<open>0 < e\<close> by simp
-    hence "emeasure M (space M) \<le> emeasure M K + e"
-      using \<open>0 < e\<close> by (simp add: emeasure_eq_measure measure_nonneg ennreal_plus[symmetric] del: ennreal_plus)
-    moreover have "compact K"
-      unfolding compact_eq_totally_bounded
-    proof safe
-      show "complete K" using \<open>closed K\<close> by (simp add: complete_eq_closed)
-      fix e'::real assume "0 < e'"
-      from nat_approx_posE[OF this] guess n . note n = this
-      let ?k = "from_nat_into X ` {0..k e (Suc n)}"
-      have "finite ?k" by simp
-      moreover have "K \<subseteq> (\<Union>x\<in>?k. ball x e')" unfolding K_def B_def using n by force
-      ultimately show "\<exists>k. finite k \<and> K \<subseteq> (\<Union>x\<in>k. ball x e')" by blast
-    qed
-    ultimately
-    show ?thesis by (auto simp: sU)
-  qed
-  { fix A::"'a set" assume "closed A" hence "A \<in> sets borel" by (simp add: compact_imp_closed)
-    hence [simp]: "A \<in> sets M" by (simp add: sb)
-    have "?inner A"
-    proof (rule approx_inner)
-      fix e::real assume "e > 0"
-      from approx_space[OF this] obtain K where
-        K: "K \<subseteq> space M" "compact K" "emeasure M (space M) \<le> emeasure M K + e"
-        by (auto simp: emeasure_eq_measure)
-      hence [simp]: "K \<in> sets M" by (simp add: sb compact_imp_closed)
-      have "measure M A - measure M (A \<inter> K) = measure M (A - A \<inter> K)"
-        by (subst finite_measure_Diff) auto
-      also have "A - A \<inter> K = A \<union> K - K" by auto
-      also have "measure M \<dots> = measure M (A \<union> K) - measure M K"
-        by (subst finite_measure_Diff) auto
-      also have "\<dots> \<le> measure M (space M) - measure M K"
-        by (simp add: emeasure_eq_measure sU sb finite_measure_mono)
-      also have "\<dots> \<le> e"
-        using K \<open>0 < e\<close> by (simp add: emeasure_eq_measure ennreal_plus[symmetric] measure_nonneg del: ennreal_plus)
-      finally have "emeasure M A \<le> emeasure M (A \<inter> K) + ennreal e"
-        using \<open>0<e\<close> by (simp add: emeasure_eq_measure algebra_simps ennreal_plus[symmetric] measure_nonneg del: ennreal_plus)
-      moreover have "A \<inter> K \<subseteq> A" "compact (A \<inter> K)" using \<open>closed A\<close> \<open>compact K\<close> by auto
-      ultimately show "\<exists>K \<subseteq> A. compact K \<and> emeasure M A \<le> emeasure M K + ennreal e"
-        by blast
-    qed simp
-    have "?outer A"
-    proof cases
-      assume "A \<noteq> {}"
-      let ?G = "\<lambda>d. {x. infdist x A < d}"
-      {
-        fix d
-        have "?G d = (\<lambda>x. infdist x A) -` {..<d}" by auto
-        also have "open \<dots>"
-          by (intro continuous_open_vimage) (auto intro!: continuous_infdist continuous_ident)
-        finally have "open (?G d)" .
-      } note open_G = this
-      from in_closed_iff_infdist_zero[OF \<open>closed A\<close> \<open>A \<noteq> {}\<close>]
-      have "A = {x. infdist x A = 0}" by auto
-      also have "\<dots> = (\<Inter>i. ?G (1/real (Suc i)))"
-      proof (auto simp del: of_nat_Suc, rule ccontr)
-        fix x
-        assume "infdist x A \<noteq> 0"
-        hence pos: "infdist x A > 0" using infdist_nonneg[of x A] by simp
-        from nat_approx_posE[OF this] guess n .
-        moreover
-        assume "\<forall>i. infdist x A < 1 / real (Suc i)"
-        hence "infdist x A < 1 / real (Suc n)" by auto
-        ultimately show False by simp
-      qed
-      also have "M \<dots> = (INF n. emeasure M (?G (1 / real (Suc n))))"
-      proof (rule INF_emeasure_decseq[symmetric], safe)
-        fix i::nat
-        from open_G[of "1 / real (Suc i)"]
-        show "?G (1 / real (Suc i)) \<in> sets M" by (simp add: sb borel_open)
-      next
-        show "decseq (\<lambda>i. {x. infdist x A < 1 / real (Suc i)})"
-          by (auto intro: less_trans intro!: divide_strict_left_mono
-            simp: decseq_def le_eq_less_or_eq)
-      qed simp
-      finally
-      have "emeasure M A = (INF n. emeasure M {x. infdist x A < 1 / real (Suc n)})" .
-      moreover
-      have "\<dots> \<ge> (INF U:{U. A \<subseteq> U \<and> open U}. emeasure M U)"
-      proof (intro INF_mono)
-        fix m
-        have "?G (1 / real (Suc m)) \<in> {U. A \<subseteq> U \<and> open U}" using open_G by auto
-        moreover have "M (?G (1 / real (Suc m))) \<le> M (?G (1 / real (Suc m)))" by simp
-        ultimately show "\<exists>U\<in>{U. A \<subseteq> U \<and> open U}.
-          emeasure M U \<le> emeasure M {x. infdist x A < 1 / real (Suc m)}"
-          by blast
-      qed
-      moreover
-      have "emeasure M A \<le> (INF U:{U. A \<subseteq> U \<and> open U}. emeasure M U)"
-        by (rule INF_greatest) (auto intro!: emeasure_mono simp: sb)
-      ultimately show ?thesis by simp
-    qed (auto intro!: INF_eqI)
-    note \<open>?inner A\<close> \<open>?outer A\<close> }
-  note closed_in_D = this
-  from \<open>B \<in> sets borel\<close>
-  have "Int_stable (Collect closed)" "Collect closed \<subseteq> Pow UNIV" "B \<in> sigma_sets UNIV (Collect closed)"
-    by (auto simp: Int_stable_def borel_eq_closed)
-  then show "?inner B" "?outer B"
-  proof (induct B rule: sigma_sets_induct_disjoint)
-    case empty
-    { case 1 show ?case by (intro SUP_eqI[symmetric]) auto }
-    { case 2 show ?case by (intro INF_eqI[symmetric]) (auto elim!: meta_allE[of _ "{}"]) }
-  next
-    case (basic B)
-    { case 1 from basic closed_in_D show ?case by auto }
-    { case 2 from basic closed_in_D show ?case by auto }
-  next
-    case (compl B)
-    note inner = compl(2) and outer = compl(3)
-    from compl have [simp]: "B \<in> sets M" by (auto simp: sb borel_eq_closed)
-    case 2
-    have "M (space M - B) = M (space M) - emeasure M B" by (auto simp: emeasure_compl)
-    also have "\<dots> = (INF K:{K. K \<subseteq> B \<and> compact K}. M (space M) -  M K)"
-      by (subst ennreal_SUP_const_minus) (auto simp: less_top[symmetric] inner)
-    also have "\<dots> = (INF U:{U. U \<subseteq> B \<and> compact U}. M (space M - U))"
-      by (rule INF_cong) (auto simp add: emeasure_compl sb compact_imp_closed)
-    also have "\<dots> \<ge> (INF U:{U. U \<subseteq> B \<and> closed U}. M (space M - U))"
-      by (rule INF_superset_mono) (auto simp add: compact_imp_closed)
-    also have "(INF U:{U. U \<subseteq> B \<and> closed U}. M (space M - U)) =
-        (INF U:{U. space M - B \<subseteq> U \<and> open U}. emeasure M U)"
-      unfolding INF_image [of _ "\<lambda>u. space M - u" _, symmetric, unfolded comp_def]
-        by (rule INF_cong) (auto simp add: sU Compl_eq_Diff_UNIV [symmetric, simp])
-    finally have
-      "(INF U:{U. space M - B \<subseteq> U \<and> open U}. emeasure M U) \<le> emeasure M (space M - B)" .
-    moreover have
-      "(INF U:{U. space M - B \<subseteq> U \<and> open U}. emeasure M U) \<ge> emeasure M (space M - B)"
-      by (auto simp: sb sU intro!: INF_greatest emeasure_mono)
-    ultimately show ?case by (auto intro!: antisym simp: sets_eq_imp_space_eq[OF sb])
-
-    case 1
-    have "M (space M - B) = M (space M) - emeasure M B" by (auto simp: emeasure_compl)
-    also have "\<dots> = (SUP U: {U. B \<subseteq> U \<and> open U}. M (space M) -  M U)"
-      unfolding outer by (subst ennreal_INF_const_minus) auto
-    also have "\<dots> = (SUP U:{U. B \<subseteq> U \<and> open U}. M (space M - U))"
-      by (rule SUP_cong) (auto simp add: emeasure_compl sb compact_imp_closed)
-    also have "\<dots> = (SUP K:{K. K \<subseteq> space M - B \<and> closed K}. emeasure M K)"
-      unfolding SUP_image [of _ "\<lambda>u. space M - u" _, symmetric, unfolded comp_def]
-        by (rule SUP_cong) (auto simp add: sU)
-    also have "\<dots> = (SUP K:{K. K \<subseteq> space M - B \<and> compact K}. emeasure M K)"
-    proof (safe intro!: antisym SUP_least)
-      fix K assume "closed K" "K \<subseteq> space M - B"
-      from closed_in_D[OF \<open>closed K\<close>]
-      have K_inner: "emeasure M K = (SUP K:{Ka. Ka \<subseteq> K \<and> compact Ka}. emeasure M K)" by simp
-      show "emeasure M K \<le> (SUP K:{K. K \<subseteq> space M - B \<and> compact K}. emeasure M K)"
-        unfolding K_inner using \<open>K \<subseteq> space M - B\<close>
-        by (auto intro!: SUP_upper SUP_least)
-    qed (fastforce intro!: SUP_least SUP_upper simp: compact_imp_closed)
-    finally show ?case by (auto intro!: antisym simp: sets_eq_imp_space_eq[OF sb])
-  next
-    case (union D)
-    then have "range D \<subseteq> sets M" by (auto simp: sb borel_eq_closed)
-    with union have M[symmetric]: "(\<Sum>i. M (D i)) = M (\<Union>i. D i)" by (intro suminf_emeasure)
-    also have "(\<lambda>n. \<Sum>i<n. M (D i)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> (\<Sum>i. M (D i))"
-      by (intro summable_LIMSEQ) auto
-    finally have measure_LIMSEQ: "(\<lambda>n. \<Sum>i<n. measure M (D i)) \<longlonglongrightarrow> measure M (\<Union>i. D i)"
-      by (simp add: emeasure_eq_measure measure_nonneg setsum_nonneg)
-    have "(\<Union>i. D i) \<in> sets M" using \<open>range D \<subseteq> sets M\<close> by auto
-
-    case 1
-    show ?case
-    proof (rule approx_inner)
-      fix e::real assume "e > 0"
-      with measure_LIMSEQ
-      have "\<exists>no. \<forall>n\<ge>no. \<bar>(\<Sum>i<n. measure M (D i)) -measure M (\<Union>x. D x)\<bar> < e/2"
-        by (auto simp: lim_sequentially dist_real_def simp del: less_divide_eq_numeral1)
-      hence "\<exists>n0. \<bar>(\<Sum>i<n0. measure M (D i)) - measure M (\<Union>x. D x)\<bar> < e/2" by auto
-      then obtain n0 where n0: "\<bar>(\<Sum>i<n0. measure M (D i)) - measure M (\<Union>i. D i)\<bar> < e/2"
-        unfolding choice_iff by blast
-      have "ennreal (\<Sum>i<n0. measure M (D i)) = (\<Sum>i<n0. M (D i))"
-        by (auto simp add: emeasure_eq_measure setsum_nonneg measure_nonneg)
-      also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<Sum>i. M (D i))" by (rule setsum_le_suminf) auto
-      also have "\<dots> = M (\<Union>i. D i)" by (simp add: M)
-      also have "\<dots> = measure M (\<Union>i. D i)" by (simp add: emeasure_eq_measure)
-      finally have n0: "measure M (\<Union>i. D i) - (\<Sum>i<n0. measure M (D i)) < e/2"
-        using n0 by (auto simp: measure_nonneg setsum_nonneg)
-      have "\<forall>i. \<exists>K. K \<subseteq> D i \<and> compact K \<and> emeasure M (D i) \<le> emeasure M K + e/(2*Suc n0)"
-      proof
-        fix i
-        from \<open>0 < e\<close> have "0 < e/(2*Suc n0)" by simp
-        have "emeasure M (D i) = (SUP K:{K. K \<subseteq> (D i) \<and> compact K}. emeasure M K)"
-          using union by blast
-        from SUP_approx_ennreal[OF \<open>0 < e/(2*Suc n0)\<close> _ this]
-        show "\<exists>K. K \<subseteq> D i \<and> compact K \<and> emeasure M (D i) \<le> emeasure M K + e/(2*Suc n0)"
-          by (auto simp: emeasure_eq_measure intro: less_imp_le compact_empty)
-      qed
-      then obtain K where K: "\<And>i. K i \<subseteq> D i" "\<And>i. compact (K i)"
-        "\<And>i. emeasure M (D i) \<le> emeasure M (K i) + e/(2*Suc n0)"
-        unfolding choice_iff by blast
-      let ?K = "\<Union>i\<in>{..<n0}. K i"
-      have "disjoint_family_on K {..<n0}" using K \<open>disjoint_family D\<close>
-        unfolding disjoint_family_on_def by blast
-      hence mK: "measure M ?K = (\<Sum>i<n0. measure M (K i))" using K
-        by (intro finite_measure_finite_Union) (auto simp: sb compact_imp_closed)
-      have "measure M (\<Union>i. D i) < (\<Sum>i<n0. measure M (D i)) + e/2" using n0 by simp
-      also have "(\<Sum>i<n0. measure M (D i)) \<le> (\<Sum>i<n0. measure M (K i) + e/(2*Suc n0))"
-        using K \<open>0 < e\<close>
-        by (auto intro: setsum_mono simp: emeasure_eq_measure measure_nonneg ennreal_plus[symmetric] simp del: ennreal_plus)
-      also have "\<dots> = (\<Sum>i<n0. measure M (K i)) + (\<Sum>i<n0. e/(2*Suc n0))"
-        by (simp add: setsum.distrib)
-      also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<Sum>i<n0. measure M (K i)) +  e / 2" using \<open>0 < e\<close>
-        by (auto simp: field_simps intro!: mult_left_mono)
-      finally
-      have "measure M (\<Union>i. D i) < (\<Sum>i<n0. measure M (K i)) + e / 2 + e / 2"
-        by auto
-      hence "M (\<Union>i. D i) < M ?K + e"
-        using \<open>0<e\<close> by (auto simp: mK emeasure_eq_measure measure_nonneg setsum_nonneg ennreal_less_iff ennreal_plus[symmetric] simp del: ennreal_plus)
-      moreover
-      have "?K \<subseteq> (\<Union>i. D i)" using K by auto
-      moreover
-      have "compact ?K" using K by auto
-      ultimately
-      have "?K\<subseteq>(\<Union>i. D i) \<and> compact ?K \<and> emeasure M (\<Union>i. D i) \<le> emeasure M ?K + ennreal e" by simp
-      thus "\<exists>K\<subseteq>\<Union>i. D i. compact K \<and> emeasure M (\<Union>i. D i) \<le> emeasure M K + ennreal e" ..
-    qed fact
-    case 2
-    show ?case
-    proof (rule approx_outer[OF \<open>(\<Union>i. D i) \<in> sets M\<close>])
-      fix e::real assume "e > 0"
-      have "\<forall>i::nat. \<exists>U. D i \<subseteq> U \<and> open U \<and> e/(2 powr Suc i) > emeasure M U - emeasure M (D i)"
-      proof
-        fix i::nat
-        from \<open>0 < e\<close> have "0 < e/(2 powr Suc i)" by simp
-        have "emeasure M (D i) = (INF U:{U. (D i) \<subseteq> U \<and> open U}. emeasure M U)"
-          using union by blast
-        from INF_approx_ennreal[OF \<open>0 < e/(2 powr Suc i)\<close> this]
-        show "\<exists>U. D i \<subseteq> U \<and> open U \<and> e/(2 powr Suc i) > emeasure M U - emeasure M (D i)"
-          using \<open>0<e\<close>
-          by (auto simp: emeasure_eq_measure measure_nonneg setsum_nonneg ennreal_less_iff ennreal_plus[symmetric] ennreal_minus
-                         finite_measure_mono sb
-                   simp del: ennreal_plus)
-      qed
-      then obtain U where U: "\<And>i. D i \<subseteq> U i" "\<And>i. open (U i)"
-        "\<And>i. e/(2 powr Suc i) > emeasure M (U i) - emeasure M (D i)"
-        unfolding choice_iff by blast
-      let ?U = "\<Union>i. U i"
-      have "ennreal (measure M ?U - measure M (\<Union>i. D i)) = M ?U - M (\<Union>i. D i)"
-        using U(1,2)
-        by (subst ennreal_minus[symmetric])
-           (auto intro!: finite_measure_mono simp: sb measure_nonneg emeasure_eq_measure)
-      also have "\<dots> = M (?U - (\<Union>i. D i))" using U  \<open>(\<Union>i. D i) \<in> sets M\<close>
-        by (subst emeasure_Diff) (auto simp: sb)
-      also have "\<dots> \<le> M (\<Union>i. U i - D i)" using U  \<open>range D \<subseteq> sets M\<close>
-        by (intro emeasure_mono) (auto simp: sb intro!: sets.countable_nat_UN sets.Diff)
-      also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<Sum>i. M (U i - D i))" using U  \<open>range D \<subseteq> sets M\<close>
-        by (intro emeasure_subadditive_countably) (auto intro!: sets.Diff simp: sb)
-      also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<Sum>i. ennreal e/(2 powr Suc i))" using U \<open>range D \<subseteq> sets M\<close>
-        using \<open>0<e\<close>
-        by (intro suminf_le, subst emeasure_Diff)
-           (auto simp: emeasure_Diff emeasure_eq_measure sb measure_nonneg ennreal_minus
-                       finite_measure_mono divide_ennreal ennreal_less_iff
-                 intro: less_imp_le)
-      also have "\<dots> \<le> (\<Sum>n. ennreal (e * (1 / 2) ^ Suc n))"
-        using \<open>0<e\<close>
-        by (simp add: powr_minus powr_realpow field_simps divide_ennreal del: of_nat_Suc)
-      also have "\<dots> = ennreal e * (\<Sum>n. ennreal ((1 / 2) ^  Suc n))"
-        unfolding ennreal_power[symmetric]
-        using \<open>0 < e\<close>
-        by (simp add: ac_simps ennreal_mult' divide_ennreal[symmetric] divide_ennreal_def
-                      ennreal_power[symmetric])
-      also have "\<dots> = ennreal e"
-        by (subst suminf_ennreal_eq[OF zero_le_power power_half_series]) auto
-      finally have "emeasure M ?U \<le> emeasure M (\<Union>i. D i) + ennreal e"
-        using \<open>0<e\<close> by (simp add: emeasure_eq_measure ennreal_plus[symmetric] measure_nonneg del: ennreal_plus)
-      moreover
-      have "(\<Union>i. D i) \<subseteq> ?U" using U by auto
-      moreover
-      have "open ?U" using U by auto
-      ultimately
-      have "(\<Union>i. D i) \<subseteq> ?U \<and> open ?U \<and> emeasure M ?U \<le> emeasure M (\<Union>i. D i) + ennreal e" by simp
-      thus "\<exists>B. (\<Union>i. D i) \<subseteq> B \<and> open B \<and> emeasure M B \<le> emeasure M (\<Union>i. D i) + ennreal e" ..
-    qed
-  qed
-qed
-
-end
-




