diff -r 3d2e35c23c66 -r 6ef5ddf22d3a src/HOL/Real/HahnBanach/HahnBanachExtLemmas.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Real/HahnBanach/HahnBanachExtLemmas.thy	Mon Dec 29 11:04:27 2008 -0800
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,281 +0,0 @@
-(*  Title:      HOL/Real/HahnBanach/HahnBanachExtLemmas.thy
-    ID:         $Id$
-    Author:     Gertrud Bauer, TU Munich
-*)
-
-header {* Extending non-maximal functions *}
-
-theory HahnBanachExtLemmas
-imports FunctionNorm
-begin
-
-text {*
-  In this section the following context is presumed.  Let @{text E} be
-  a real vector space with a seminorm @{text q} on @{text E}. @{text
-  F} is a subspace of @{text E} and @{text f} a linear function on
-  @{text F}. We consider a subspace @{text H} of @{text E} that is a
-  superspace of @{text F} and a linear form @{text h} on @{text
-  H}. @{text H} is a not equal to @{text E} and @{text "x\<^sub>0"} is
-  an element in @{text "E - H"}.  @{text H} is extended to the direct
-  sum @{text "H' = H + lin x\<^sub>0"}, so for any @{text "x \<in> H'"}
-  the decomposition of @{text "x = y + a \<cdot> x"} with @{text "y \<in> H"} is
-  unique. @{text h'} is defined on @{text H'} by @{text "h' x = h y +
-  a \<cdot> \<xi>"} for a certain @{text \<xi>}.
-
-  Subsequently we show some properties of this extension @{text h'} of
-  @{text h}.
-
-  \medskip This lemma will be used to show the existence of a linear
-  extension of @{text f} (see page \pageref{ex-xi-use}). It is a
-  consequence of the completeness of @{text \<real>}. To show
-  \begin{center}
-  \begin{tabular}{l}
-  @{text "\<exists>\<xi>. \<forall>y \<in> F. a y \<le> \<xi> \<and> \<xi> \<le> b y"}
-  \end{tabular}
-  \end{center}
-  \noindent it suffices to show that
-  \begin{center}
-  \begin{tabular}{l}
-  @{text "\<forall>u \<in> F. \<forall>v \<in> F. a u \<le> b v"}
-  \end{tabular}
-  \end{center}
-*}
-
-lemma ex_xi:
-  assumes "vectorspace F"
-  assumes r: "\<And>u v. u \<in> F \<Longrightarrow> v \<in> F \<Longrightarrow> a u \<le> b v"
-  shows "\<exists>xi::real. \<forall>y \<in> F. a y \<le> xi \<and> xi \<le> b y"
-proof -
-  interpret vectorspace [F] by fact
-  txt {* From the completeness of the reals follows:
-    The set @{text "S = {a u. u \<in> F}"} has a supremum, if it is
-    non-empty and has an upper bound. *}
-
-  let ?S = "{a u | u. u \<in> F}"
-  have "\<exists>xi. lub ?S xi"
-  proof (rule real_complete)
-    have "a 0 \<in> ?S" by blast
-    then show "\<exists>X. X \<in> ?S" ..
-    have "\<forall>y \<in> ?S. y \<le> b 0"
-    proof
-      fix y assume y: "y \<in> ?S"
-      then obtain u where u: "u \<in> F" and y: "y = a u" by blast
-      from u and zero have "a u \<le> b 0" by (rule r)
-      with y show "y \<le> b 0" by (simp only:)
-    qed
-    then show "\<exists>u. \<forall>y \<in> ?S. y \<le> u" ..
-  qed
-  then obtain xi where xi: "lub ?S xi" ..
-  {
-    fix y assume "y \<in> F"
-    then have "a y \<in> ?S" by blast
-    with xi have "a y \<le> xi" by (rule lub.upper)
-  } moreover {
-    fix y assume y: "y \<in> F"
-    from xi have "xi \<le> b y"
-    proof (rule lub.least)
-      fix au assume "au \<in> ?S"
-      then obtain u where u: "u \<in> F" and au: "au = a u" by blast
-      from u y have "a u \<le> b y" by (rule r)
-      with au show "au \<le> b y" by (simp only:)
-    qed
-  } ultimately show "\<exists>xi. \<forall>y \<in> F. a y \<le> xi \<and> xi \<le> b y" by blast
-qed
-
-text {*
-  \medskip The function @{text h'} is defined as a @{text "h' x = h y
-  + a \<cdot> \<xi>"} where @{text "x = y + a \<cdot> \<xi>"} is a linear extension of
-  @{text h} to @{text H'}.
-*}
-
-lemma h'_lf:
-  assumes h'_def: "h' \<equiv> \<lambda>x. let (y, a) =
-      SOME (y, a). x = y + a \<cdot> x0 \<and> y \<in> H in h y + a * xi"
-    and H'_def: "H' \<equiv> H + lin x0"
-    and HE: "H \<unlhd> E"
-  assumes "linearform H h"
-  assumes x0: "x0 \<notin> H"  "x0 \<in> E"  "x0 \<noteq> 0"
-  assumes E: "vectorspace E"
-  shows "linearform H' h'"
-proof -
-  interpret linearform [H h] by fact
-  interpret vectorspace [E] by fact
-  show ?thesis
-  proof
-    note E = `vectorspace E`
-    have H': "vectorspace H'"
-    proof (unfold H'_def)
-      from `x0 \<in> E`
-      have "lin x0 \<unlhd> E" ..
-      with HE show "vectorspace (H + lin x0)" using E ..
-    qed
-    {
-      fix x1 x2 assume x1: "x1 \<in> H'" and x2: "x2 \<in> H'"
-      show "h' (x1 + x2) = h' x1 + h' x2"
-      proof -
-	from H' x1 x2 have "x1 + x2 \<in> H'"
-          by (rule vectorspace.add_closed)
-	with x1 x2 obtain y y1 y2 a a1 a2 where
-          x1x2: "x1 + x2 = y + a \<cdot> x0" and y: "y \<in> H"
-          and x1_rep: "x1 = y1 + a1 \<cdot> x0" and y1: "y1 \<in> H"
-          and x2_rep: "x2 = y2 + a2 \<cdot> x0" and y2: "y2 \<in> H"
-          unfolding H'_def sum_def lin_def by blast
-	
-	have ya: "y1 + y2 = y \<and> a1 + a2 = a" using E HE _ y x0
-	proof (rule decomp_H') txt_raw {* \label{decomp-H-use} *}
-          from HE y1 y2 show "y1 + y2 \<in> H"
-            by (rule subspace.add_closed)
-          from x0 and HE y y1 y2
-          have "x0 \<in> E"  "y \<in> E"  "y1 \<in> E"  "y2 \<in> E" by auto
-          with x1_rep x2_rep have "(y1 + y2) + (a1 + a2) \<cdot> x0 = x1 + x2"
-            by (simp add: add_ac add_mult_distrib2)
-          also note x1x2
-          finally show "(y1 + y2) + (a1 + a2) \<cdot> x0 = y + a \<cdot> x0" .
-	qed
-	
-	from h'_def x1x2 E HE y x0
-	have "h' (x1 + x2) = h y + a * xi"
-          by (rule h'_definite)
-	also have "\<dots> = h (y1 + y2) + (a1 + a2) * xi"
-          by (simp only: ya)
-	also from y1 y2 have "h (y1 + y2) = h y1 + h y2"
-          by simp
-	also have "\<dots> + (a1 + a2) * xi = (h y1 + a1 * xi) + (h y2 + a2 * xi)"
-          by (simp add: left_distrib)
-	also from h'_def x1_rep E HE y1 x0
-	have "h y1 + a1 * xi = h' x1"
-          by (rule h'_definite [symmetric])
-	also from h'_def x2_rep E HE y2 x0
-	have "h y2 + a2 * xi = h' x2"
-          by (rule h'_definite [symmetric])
-	finally show ?thesis .
-      qed
-    next
-      fix x1 c assume x1: "x1 \<in> H'"
-      show "h' (c \<cdot> x1) = c * (h' x1)"
-      proof -
-	from H' x1 have ax1: "c \<cdot> x1 \<in> H'"
-          by (rule vectorspace.mult_closed)
-	with x1 obtain y a y1 a1 where
-            cx1_rep: "c \<cdot> x1 = y + a \<cdot> x0" and y: "y \<in> H"
-          and x1_rep: "x1 = y1 + a1 \<cdot> x0" and y1: "y1 \<in> H"
-          unfolding H'_def sum_def lin_def by blast
-	
-	have ya: "c \<cdot> y1 = y \<and> c * a1 = a" using E HE _ y x0
-	proof (rule decomp_H')
-          from HE y1 show "c \<cdot> y1 \<in> H"
-            by (rule subspace.mult_closed)
-          from x0 and HE y y1
-          have "x0 \<in> E"  "y \<in> E"  "y1 \<in> E" by auto
-          with x1_rep have "c \<cdot> y1 + (c * a1) \<cdot> x0 = c \<cdot> x1"
-            by (simp add: mult_assoc add_mult_distrib1)
-          also note cx1_rep
-          finally show "c \<cdot> y1 + (c * a1) \<cdot> x0 = y + a \<cdot> x0" .
-	qed
-	
-	from h'_def cx1_rep E HE y x0 have "h' (c \<cdot> x1) = h y + a * xi"
-          by (rule h'_definite)
-	also have "\<dots> = h (c \<cdot> y1) + (c * a1) * xi"
-          by (simp only: ya)
-	also from y1 have "h (c \<cdot> y1) = c * h y1"
-          by simp
-	also have "\<dots> + (c * a1) * xi = c * (h y1 + a1 * xi)"
-          by (simp only: right_distrib)
-	also from h'_def x1_rep E HE y1 x0 have "h y1 + a1 * xi = h' x1"
-          by (rule h'_definite [symmetric])
-	finally show ?thesis .
-      qed
-    }
-  qed
-qed
-
-text {* \medskip The linear extension @{text h'} of @{text h}
-  is bounded by the seminorm @{text p}. *}
-
-lemma h'_norm_pres:
-  assumes h'_def: "h' \<equiv> \<lambda>x. let (y, a) =
-      SOME (y, a). x = y + a \<cdot> x0 \<and> y \<in> H in h y + a * xi"
-    and H'_def: "H' \<equiv> H + lin x0"
-    and x0: "x0 \<notin> H"  "x0 \<in> E"  "x0 \<noteq> 0"
-  assumes E: "vectorspace E" and HE: "subspace H E"
-    and "seminorm E p" and "linearform H h"
-  assumes a: "\<forall>y \<in> H. h y \<le> p y"
-    and a': "\<forall>y \<in> H. - p (y + x0) - h y \<le> xi \<and> xi \<le> p (y + x0) - h y"
-  shows "\<forall>x \<in> H'. h' x \<le> p x"
-proof -
-  interpret vectorspace [E] by fact
-  interpret subspace [H E] by fact
-  interpret seminorm [E p] by fact
-  interpret linearform [H h] by fact
-  show ?thesis
-  proof
-    fix x assume x': "x \<in> H'"
-    show "h' x \<le> p x"
-    proof -
-      from a' have a1: "\<forall>ya \<in> H. - p (ya + x0) - h ya \<le> xi"
-	and a2: "\<forall>ya \<in> H. xi \<le> p (ya + x0) - h ya" by auto
-      from x' obtain y a where
-          x_rep: "x = y + a \<cdot> x0" and y: "y \<in> H"
-	unfolding H'_def sum_def lin_def by blast
-      from y have y': "y \<in> E" ..
-      from y have ay: "inverse a \<cdot> y \<in> H" by simp
-      
-      from h'_def x_rep E HE y x0 have "h' x = h y + a * xi"
-	by (rule h'_definite)
-      also have "\<dots> \<le> p (y + a \<cdot> x0)"
-      proof (rule linorder_cases)
-	assume z: "a = 0"
-	then have "h y + a * xi = h y" by simp
-	also from a y have "\<dots> \<le> p y" ..
-	also from x0 y' z have "p y = p (y + a \<cdot> x0)" by simp
-	finally show ?thesis .
-      next
-	txt {* In the case @{text "a < 0"}, we use @{text "a\<^sub>1"}
-          with @{text ya} taken as @{text "y / a"}: *}
-	assume lz: "a < 0" then have nz: "a \<noteq> 0" by simp
-	from a1 ay
-	have "- p (inverse a \<cdot> y + x0) - h (inverse a \<cdot> y) \<le> xi" ..
-	with lz have "a * xi \<le>
-          a * (- p (inverse a \<cdot> y + x0) - h (inverse a \<cdot> y))"
-          by (simp add: mult_left_mono_neg order_less_imp_le)
-	
-	also have "\<dots> =
-          - a * (p (inverse a \<cdot> y + x0)) - a * (h (inverse a \<cdot> y))"
-	  by (simp add: right_diff_distrib)
-	also from lz x0 y' have "- a * (p (inverse a \<cdot> y + x0)) =
-          p (a \<cdot> (inverse a \<cdot> y + x0))"
-          by (simp add: abs_homogenous)
-	also from nz x0 y' have "\<dots> = p (y + a \<cdot> x0)"
-          by (simp add: add_mult_distrib1 mult_assoc [symmetric])
-	also from nz y have "a * (h (inverse a \<cdot> y)) =  h y"
-          by simp
-	finally have "a * xi \<le> p (y + a \<cdot> x0) - h y" .
-	then show ?thesis by simp
-      next
-	txt {* In the case @{text "a > 0"}, we use @{text "a\<^sub>2"}
-          with @{text ya} taken as @{text "y / a"}: *}
-	assume gz: "0 < a" then have nz: "a \<noteq> 0" by simp
-	from a2 ay
-	have "xi \<le> p (inverse a \<cdot> y + x0) - h (inverse a \<cdot> y)" ..
-	with gz have "a * xi \<le>
-          a * (p (inverse a \<cdot> y + x0) - h (inverse a \<cdot> y))"
-          by simp
-	also have "\<dots> = a * p (inverse a \<cdot> y + x0) - a * h (inverse a \<cdot> y)"
-	  by (simp add: right_diff_distrib)
-	also from gz x0 y'
-	have "a * p (inverse a \<cdot> y + x0) = p (a \<cdot> (inverse a \<cdot> y + x0))"
-          by (simp add: abs_homogenous)
-	also from nz x0 y' have "\<dots> = p (y + a \<cdot> x0)"
-          by (simp add: add_mult_distrib1 mult_assoc [symmetric])
-	also from nz y have "a * h (inverse a \<cdot> y) = h y"
-          by simp
-	finally have "a * xi \<le> p (y + a \<cdot> x0) - h y" .
-	then show ?thesis by simp
-      qed
-      also from x_rep have "\<dots> = p x" by (simp only:)
-      finally show ?thesis .
-    qed
-  qed
-qed
-
-end