
diff -r 7263c856787e -r b9fd52525b69 doc-src/TutorialI/Inductive/Star.thy
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/doc-src/TutorialI/Inductive/Star.thy	Mon Oct 16 13:21:01 2000 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,56 @@
+(*<*)theory Star = Main:(*>*)
+
+section{*The transitive and reflexive closure*}
+
+text{*
+A perfect example of an inductive definition is the transitive, reflexive
+closure of a relation. This concept was already introduced in
+\S\ref{sec:rtrancl}, but it was not shown how it is defined. In fact,
+the operator @{text"^*"} is not defined inductively but via a least
+fixpoint because at that point in the theory hierarchy
+inductive definitions are not yet available. But now they are:
+*}
+
+consts trc :: "('a \<times> 'a)set \<Rightarrow> ('a \<times> 'a)set"  ("_*" [1000] 999)
+inductive "r*"
+intros
+trc_refl[intro!]:                        "(x,x) \<in> r*"
+trc_step: "\<lbrakk> (x,y) \<in> r*; (y,z) \<in> r \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (x,z) \<in> r*"
+
+lemma [intro]: "(x,y) : r \<Longrightarrow> (x,y) \<in> r*"
+by(blast intro: trc_step);
+
+lemma step2[rule_format]:
+  "(y,z) \<in> r*  \<Longrightarrow> (x,y) \<in> r \<longrightarrow> (x,z) \<in> r*"
+apply(erule trc.induct)
+ apply(blast);
+apply(blast intro: trc_step);
+done
+
+lemma trc_trans[rule_format]:
+  "(x,y) \<in> r*  \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>z. (y,z) \<in> r* \<longrightarrow> (x,z) \<in> r*"
+apply(erule trc.induct)
+ apply blast;
+apply(blast intro: step2);
+done
+
+consts trc2 :: "('a \<times> 'a)set \<Rightarrow> ('a \<times> 'a)set"
+inductive "trc2 r"
+intros
+"(x,y) \<in> r \<Longrightarrow> (x,y) \<in> trc2 r"
+"(x,x) \<in> trc2 r"
+"\<lbrakk> (x,y) \<in> trc2 r; (y,z) \<in> trc2 r \<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> (x,z) \<in> trc2 r"
+
+
+lemma "((x,y) \<in> trc2 r) = ((x,y) \<in> r*)"
+apply(rule iffI);
+ apply(erule trc2.induct);
+   apply(blast);
+  apply(blast);
+ apply(blast intro: trc_trans);
+apply(erule trc.induct);
+ apply(blast intro: trc2.intros);
+apply(blast intro: trc2.intros);
+done
+
+(*<*)end(*>*)




