
diff -r 6c1bf72430b6 -r cbcba2092d6b src/HOL/Lambda/Type.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Lambda/Type.thy	Thu Oct 25 20:00:11 2001 +0200
+++ b/src/HOL/Lambda/Type.thy	Thu Oct 25 20:04:43 2001 +0200
@@ -27,6 +27,7 @@
 syntax
   "_typing" :: "[nat => type, dB, type] => bool"  ("_ |- _ : _" [50,50,50] 50)
   "_funs" :: "[type list, type] => type"  (infixl "=>>" 150)
+
 translations
   "env |- t : T" == "(env, t, T) \<in> typing"
   "Ts =>> T" == "foldr Fun Ts T"
@@ -37,6 +38,10 @@
     Abs [intro!]: "(nat_case T env) |- t : U ==> env |- Abs t : (T => U)"
     App [intro!]: "env |- s : T => U ==> env |- t : T ==> env |- (s $ t) : U"
 
+constdefs
+  shift :: "(nat \<Rightarrow> 'a) \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> nat \<Rightarrow> 'a" ("_<_:_>" [50,0,0] 51)
+  "e<i:a> == \<lambda>j. if j < i then e j else if j = i then a else e (j - 1)"
+
 inductive_cases [elim!]:
   "e |- Var i : T"
   "e |- t $ u : T"
@@ -60,15 +65,13 @@
 subsection {* Some examples *}
 
 lemma "e |- Abs (Abs (Abs (Var 1 $ (Var 2 $ Var 1 $ Var 0)))) : ?T"
-  apply force
-  done
+  by force
 
 lemma "e |- Abs (Abs (Abs (Var 2 $ Var 0 $ (Var 1 $ Var 0)))) : ?T"
-  apply force
-  done
+  by force
 
 
-text {* Iterated function types *}
+subsection {* @{text n}-ary function types *}
 
 lemma list_app_typeD [rule_format]:
     "\<forall>t T. e |- t $$ ts : T --> (\<exists>Ts. e |- t : Ts =>> T \<and> types e ts Ts)"
@@ -86,6 +89,10 @@
   apply simp
   done
 
+lemma list_app_typeE:
+  "e |- t $$ ts : T \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>Ts. e |- t : Ts =>> T \<Longrightarrow> types e ts Ts \<Longrightarrow> C) \<Longrightarrow> C"
+  by (insert list_app_typeD) fast
+
 lemma list_app_typeI [rule_format]:
     "\<forall>t T Ts. e |- t : Ts =>> T --> types e ts Ts --> e |- t $$ ts : T"
   apply (induct_tac ts)
@@ -125,17 +132,13 @@
 
 subsection {* Lifting preserves termination and well-typedness *}
 
-lemma lift_map [rule_format, simp]:
-    "\<forall>t. lift (t $$ ts) i = lift t i $$ map (\<lambda>t. lift t i) ts"
-  apply (induct_tac ts)
-   apply simp_all
-  done
+lemma lift_map [simp]:
+    "\<And>t. lift (t $$ ts) i = lift t i $$ map (\<lambda>t. lift t i) ts"
+  by (induct ts) simp_all
 
-lemma subst_map [rule_format, simp]:
-  "\<forall>t. subst (t $$ ts) u i = subst t u i $$ map (\<lambda>t. subst t u i) ts"
-  apply (induct_tac ts)
-   apply simp_all
-  done
+lemma subst_map [simp]:
+    "\<And>t. subst (t $$ ts) u i = subst t u i $$ map (\<lambda>t. subst t u i) ts"
+  by (induct ts) simp_all
 
 lemma lift_IT [rule_format, intro!]:
     "t \<in> IT ==> \<forall>i. lift t i \<in> IT"
@@ -157,12 +160,9 @@
      apply auto
    done
 
-lemma lifts_IT [rule_format]:
-    "ts \<in> lists IT --> map (\<lambda>t. lift t 0) ts \<in> lists IT"
-  apply (induct_tac ts)
-   apply auto
-  done
-
+lemma lifts_IT:
+    "ts \<in> lists IT \<Longrightarrow> map (\<lambda>t. lift t 0) ts \<in> lists IT"
+  by (induct ts) auto
 
 lemma shift_env [simp]:
   "nat_case T
@@ -176,33 +176,26 @@
    apply simp_all
   done
 
-lemma lift_type' [rule_format]:
-  "e |- t : T ==> \<forall>i U.
-    (\<lambda>j. if j < i then e j
-          else if j = i then U
-          else e (j - 1)) |- lift t i : T"
-  apply (erule typing.induct)
-    apply auto
-  done
+lemma lift_type':
+  "e |- t : T ==> e<i:U> |- lift t i : T"
+proof -
+  assume "e |- t : T"
+  thus "\<And>i U. e<i:U> |- lift t i : T"
+    by induct (auto simp add: shift_def)
+qed
 
 lemma lift_type [intro!]:
     "e |- t : T ==> nat_case U e |- lift t 0 : T"
-  apply (subgoal_tac
-    "nat_case U e =
-      (\<lambda>j. if j < 0 then e j
-            else if j = 0 then U else e (j - 1))")
+  apply (subgoal_tac "nat_case U e = e<0:U>")
    apply (erule ssubst)
    apply (erule lift_type')
   apply (rule ext)
-  apply (case_tac j)
-   apply simp_all
+  apply (case_tac x)
+   apply (simp_all add: shift_def)
   done
 
 lemma lift_types [rule_format]:
-  "\<forall>Ts. types e ts Ts -->
-    types (\<lambda>j. if j < i then e j
-                else if j = i then U
-                else e (j - 1)) (map (\<lambda>t. lift t i) ts) Ts"
+  "\<forall>Ts. types e ts Ts --> types (e<i:U>) (map (\<lambda>t. lift t i) ts) Ts"
   apply (induct_tac ts)
    apply simp
   apply (intro strip)
@@ -216,11 +209,9 @@
 subsection {* Substitution lemmas *}
 
 lemma subst_lemma [rule_format]:
-  "e |- t : T ==> \<forall>e' i U u.
-    e = (\<lambda>j. if j < i then e' j
-              else if j = i then U
-              else e' (j - 1)) -->
-    e' |- u : U --> e' |- t[u/i] : T"
+  "e |- t : T ==> \<forall>e' i U u. e' |- u : U -->
+    e = e'<i:U> --> e' |- t[u/i] : T"
+  apply (unfold shift_def)
   apply (erule typing.induct)
     apply (intro strip)
     apply (case_tac "x = i")
@@ -235,14 +226,12 @@
     apply (rule typing.Var)
     apply assumption
    apply fastsimp
-  apply fastsimp
+  apply auto
   done
 
 lemma substs_lemma [rule_format]:
-  "e |- u : T ==>
-    \<forall>Ts. types (\<lambda>j. if j < i then e j
-                     else if j = i then T else e (j - 1)) ts Ts -->
-      types e (map (\<lambda>t. t[u/i]) ts) Ts"
+  "e |- u : T ==> \<forall>Ts. types (e<i:T>) ts Ts -->
+     types e (map (\<lambda>t. t[u/i]) ts) Ts"
   apply (induct_tac ts)
    apply (intro strip)
    apply (case_tac Ts)
@@ -254,8 +243,8 @@
   apply simp
   apply (erule conjE)
   apply (erule subst_lemma)
-   apply (rule refl)
-  apply assumption
+   apply assumption
+  apply (rule refl)
   done
 
 
@@ -272,19 +261,17 @@
     apply (ind_cases "env |- Abs t : T => U")
     apply (rule subst_lemma)
       apply assumption
-     prefer 2
      apply assumption
     apply (rule ext)
-    apply (case_tac j)
-     apply auto
+    apply (case_tac x)
+     apply (auto simp add: shift_def)
   done
 
 
 subsection {* Additional lemmas *}
 
 lemma app_last: "(t $$ ts) $ u = t $$ (ts @ [u])"
-  apply simp
-  done
+  by simp
 
 lemma subst_Var_IT [rule_format]: "r \<in> IT ==> \<forall>i j. r[Var i/j] \<in> IT"
   apply (erule IT.induct)
@@ -340,130 +327,215 @@
   apply assumption
   done
 
+lemma type_induct [induct type]:
+  "(\<And>T. (\<And>T1 T2. T = T1 => T2 \<Longrightarrow> P T1) \<Longrightarrow>
+   (\<And>T1 T2. T = T1 => T2 \<Longrightarrow> P T2) \<Longrightarrow> P T) \<Longrightarrow> P T"
+proof -
+  case rule_context
+  show ?thesis
+  proof (induct T)
+    case Atom
+    show ?case by (rule rule_context) simp_all
+  next
+    case Fun
+    show ?case  by (rule rule_context) (insert Fun, simp_all)
+  qed
+qed
+
 
 subsection {* Well-typed substitution preserves termination *}
 
-lemma subst_type_IT [rule_format]:
-  "\<forall>t. t \<in> IT --> (\<forall>e T u i.
-    (\<lambda>j. if j < i then e j
-          else if j = i then U
-          else e (j - 1)) |- t : T -->
-    u \<in> IT --> e |- u : U --> t[u/i] \<in> IT)"
-  apply (rule_tac f = size and a = U in measure_induct)
-  apply (rule allI)
-  apply (rule impI)
-  apply (erule IT.induct)
-    txt {* Case @{term Var}: *}
-    apply (intro strip)
-    apply (case_tac "n = i")
-     txt {* Case @{term "n = i"}: *}
-     apply (case_tac rs)
-      apply simp
-     apply simp
-     apply (drule list_app_typeD)
-     apply (elim exE conjE)
-     apply (ind_cases "e |- t $ u : T")
-     apply (ind_cases "e |- Var i : T")
-     apply (drule_tac s = "(?T::type) => ?U" in sym)
-     apply simp
-     apply (subgoal_tac "lift u 0 $ Var 0 \<in> IT")
-      prefer 2
-      apply (rule app_Var_IT)
-      apply (erule lift_IT)
-     apply (subgoal_tac "(lift u 0 $ Var 0)[a[u/i]/0] \<in> IT")
-      apply (simp (no_asm_use))
-      apply (subgoal_tac "(Var 0 $$ map (\<lambda>t. lift t 0)
-        (map (\<lambda>t. t[u/i]) list))[(u $ a[u/i])/0] \<in> IT")
-       apply (simp (no_asm_use) del: map_compose
-	 add: map_compose [symmetric] o_def)
-      apply (erule_tac x = "Ts =>> T" in allE)
-      apply (erule impE)
-       apply simp
-      apply (erule_tac x = "Var 0 $$
-        map (\<lambda>t. lift t 0) (map (\<lambda>t. t[u/i]) list)" in allE)
-      apply (erule impE)
-       apply (rule IT.Var)
-       apply (rule lifts_IT)
-       apply (drule lists_types)
-       apply
-        (ind_cases "x # xs \<in> lists (Collect P)",
-         erule lists_IntI [THEN lists.induct],
-         assumption)
-        apply fastsimp
-       apply fastsimp
-      apply (erule_tac x = e in allE)
-      apply (erule_tac x = T in allE)
-      apply (erule_tac x = "u $ a[u/i]" in allE)
-      apply (erule_tac x = 0 in allE)
-      apply (fastsimp intro!: list_app_typeI lift_types subst_lemma substs_lemma)
-     apply (erule_tac x = Ta in allE)
-     apply (erule impE)
-      apply simp
-     apply (erule_tac x = "lift u 0 $ Var 0" in allE)
-     apply (erule impE)
-      apply assumption
-     apply (erule_tac x = e in allE)
-     apply (erule_tac x = "Ts =>> T" in allE)
-     apply (erule_tac x = "a[u/i]" in allE)
-     apply (erule_tac x = 0 in allE)
-     apply (erule impE)
-      apply (rule typing.App)
-       apply (erule lift_type')
-      apply (rule typing.Var)
-      apply simp
-     apply (fast intro!: subst_lemma)
-    txt {* Case @{term "n ~= i"}: *}
-    apply (drule list_app_typeD)
-    apply (erule exE)
-    apply (erule conjE)
-    apply (drule lists_types)
-    apply (subgoal_tac "map (\<lambda>x. x[u/i]) rs \<in> lists IT")
-     apply (simp add: subst_Var)
-     apply fast
-    apply (erule lists_IntI [THEN lists.induct])
-      apply assumption
-     apply fastsimp
-    apply fastsimp
-   txt {* Case @{term Lambda}: *}
-   apply fastsimp
-  txt {* Case @{term Beta}: *}
-  apply (intro strip)
-  apply (simp (no_asm))
-  apply (rule IT.Beta)
-   apply (simp (no_asm) del: subst_map add: subst_subst subst_map [symmetric])
-   apply (drule subject_reduction)
-    apply (rule apps_preserves_beta)
-    apply (rule beta.beta)
-   apply fast
-  apply (drule list_app_typeD)
-  apply fast
-  done
+lemma subst_type_IT:
+  "\<And>t e T u i. t \<in> IT \<Longrightarrow> e<i:U> |- t : T \<Longrightarrow>
+    u \<in> IT \<Longrightarrow> e |- u : U \<Longrightarrow> t[u/i] \<in> IT"
+  (is "PROP ?P U" is "\<And>t e T u i. _ \<Longrightarrow> PROP ?Q t e T u i U")
+proof (induct U)
+  fix T t
+  assume MI1: "\<And>T1 T2. T = T1 => T2 \<Longrightarrow> PROP ?P T1"
+  assume MI2: "\<And>T1 T2. T = T1 => T2 \<Longrightarrow> PROP ?P T2"
+  assume "t \<in> IT"
+  thus "\<And>e T' u i. PROP ?Q t e T' u i T"
+  proof induct
+    fix e T' u i
+    assume uIT: "u : IT"
+    assume uT: "e |- u : T"
+    {
+      case (Var n rs)
+      assume nT: "e<i:T> |- Var n $$ rs : T'"
+      let ?ty = "{t. \<exists>T'. e<i:T> |- t : T'}"
+      let ?R = "\<lambda>t. \<forall>e T' u i.
+	e<i:T> |- t : T' \<longrightarrow> u \<in> IT \<longrightarrow> e |- u : T \<longrightarrow> t[u/i] \<in> IT"
+      show "(Var n $$ rs)[u/i] \<in> IT"
+      proof (cases "n = i")
+	case True
+	show ?thesis
+	proof (cases rs)
+	  case Nil
+	  with uIT True show ?thesis by simp
+	next
+	  case (Cons a as)
+	  with nT have "e<i:T> |- Var n $ a $$ as : T'" by simp
+	  then obtain Ts
+	    where headT: "e<i:T> |- Var n $ a : Ts =>> T'"
+	    and argsT: "types (e<i:T>) as Ts"
+	    by (rule list_app_typeE)
+	  from headT obtain T''
+	    where varT: "e<i:T> |- Var n : T'' => (Ts =>> T')"
+	    and argT: "e<i:T> |- a : T''"
+	    by cases simp_all
+	  from varT True have T: "T = T'' => (Ts =>> T')"
+	    by cases (auto simp add: shift_def)
+	  with uT have uT': "e |- u : T'' => (Ts =>> T')" by simp
+	  from Var have SI: "?R a" by cases (simp_all add: Cons)
+	  from T have "(Var 0 $$ map (\<lambda>t. lift t 0)
+            (map (\<lambda>t. t[u/i]) as))[(u $ a[u/i])/0] \<in> IT"
+	  proof (rule MI2)
+	    from T have "(lift u 0 $ Var 0)[a[u/i]/0] \<in> IT"
+	    proof (rule MI1)
+	      have "lift u 0 : IT" by (rule lift_IT)
+	      thus "lift u 0 $ Var 0 \<in> IT" by (rule app_Var_IT)
+	      show "e<0:T''> |- lift u 0 $ Var 0 : Ts =>> T'"
+	      proof (rule typing.App)
+		show "e<0:T''> |- lift u 0 : T'' => (Ts =>> T')"
+		  by (rule lift_type') (rule uT')
+		show "e<0:T''> |- Var 0 : T''"
+		  by (rule typing.Var) (simp add: shift_def)
+	      qed
+	      from argT uIT uT show "a[u/i] : IT"
+		by (rule SI[rule_format])
+	      from argT uT show "e |- a[u/i] : T''"
+		by (rule subst_lemma) (simp add: shift_def)
+	    qed
+	    thus "u $ a[u/i] \<in> IT" by simp
+	    from Var have "as : lists {t. ?R t}"
+	      by cases (simp_all add: Cons)
+	    moreover from argsT have "as : lists ?ty"
+	      by (rule lists_types)
+	    ultimately have "as : lists ({t. ?R t} \<inter> ?ty)"
+	      by (rule lists_IntI)
+	    hence "map (\<lambda>t. lift t 0) (map (\<lambda>t. t[u/i]) as) \<in> lists IT"
+	      (is "(?ls as) \<in> _")
+	    proof induct
+	      case Nil
+	      show ?case by fastsimp
+	    next
+	      case (Cons b bs)
+	      hence I: "?R b" by simp
+	      from Cons obtain U where "e<i:T> |- b : U" by fast
+	      with uT uIT I have "b[u/i] : IT" by simp
+	      hence "lift (b[u/i]) 0 : IT" by (rule lift_IT)
+	      hence "lift (b[u/i]) 0 # ?ls bs \<in> lists IT"
+		by (rule lists.Cons) (rule Cons)
+	      thus ?case by simp
+	    qed
+	    thus "Var 0 $$ ?ls as \<in> IT" by (rule IT.Var)
+	    have "e<0:Ts =>> T'> |- Var 0 : Ts =>> T'"
+	      by (rule typing.Var) (simp add: shift_def)
+	    moreover from uT argsT have "types e (map (\<lambda>t. t[u/i]) as) Ts"
+	      by (rule substs_lemma)
+	    hence "types (e<0:Ts =>> T'>) (?ls as) Ts"
+	      by (rule lift_types)
+	    ultimately show "e<0:Ts =>> T'> |- Var 0 $$ ?ls as : T'"
+	      by (rule list_app_typeI)
+	    from argT uT have "e |- a[u/i] : T''"
+	      by (rule subst_lemma) (rule refl)
+	    with uT' show "e |- u $ a[u/i] : Ts =>> T'"
+	      by (rule typing.App)
+	  qed
+	  with Cons True show ?thesis
+	    by (simp add: map_compose [symmetric] o_def)
+	qed
+      next
+	case False
+	from Var have "rs : lists {t. ?R t}" by simp
+	moreover from nT obtain Ts where "types (e<i:T>) rs Ts"
+	  by (rule list_app_typeE)
+	hence "rs : lists ?ty" by (rule lists_types)
+	ultimately have "rs : lists ({t. ?R t} \<inter> ?ty)"
+	  by (rule lists_IntI)
+	hence "map (\<lambda>x. x[u/i]) rs \<in> lists IT"
+	proof induct
+	  case Nil
+	  show ?case by fastsimp
+	next
+	  case (Cons a as)
+	  hence I: "?R a" by simp
+	  from Cons obtain U where "e<i:T> |- a : U" by fast
+	  with uT uIT I have "a[u/i] : IT" by simp
+	  hence "a[u/i] # map (\<lambda>t. t[u/i]) as \<in> lists IT"
+	    by (rule lists.Cons) (rule Cons)
+	  thus ?case by simp
+	qed
+	with False show ?thesis by (auto simp add: subst_Var)
+      qed
+    next
+      case (Lambda r)
+      assume "e<i:T> |- Abs r : T'"
+	and "\<And>e T' u i. PROP ?Q r e T' u i T"
+      with uIT uT show "Abs r[u/i] \<in> IT"
+	by (fastsimp simp add: shift_def)
+    next
+      case (Beta r a as)
+      assume T: "e<i:T> |- Abs r $ a $$ as : T'"
+      assume SI1: "\<And>e T' u i. PROP ?Q (r[a/0] $$ as) e T' u i T"
+      assume SI2: "\<And>e T' u i. PROP ?Q a e T' u i T"
+      have "Abs (r[lift u 0/Suc i]) $ a[u/i] $$ map (\<lambda>t. t[u/i]) as \<in> IT"
+      proof (rule IT.Beta)
+	have "Abs r $ a $$ as -> r[a/0] $$ as"
+	  by (rule apps_preserves_beta) (rule beta.beta)
+	with T have "e<i:T> |- r[a/0] $$ as : T'"
+	  by (rule subject_reduction)
+	hence "(r[a/0] $$ as)[u/i] \<in> IT"
+	  by (rule SI1)
+	thus "r[lift u 0/Suc i][a[u/i]/0] $$ map (\<lambda>t. t[u/i]) as \<in> IT"
+	  by (simp del: subst_map add: subst_subst subst_map [symmetric])
+	from T obtain U where "e<i:T> |- Abs r $ a : U"
+	  by (rule list_app_typeE) fast
+	then obtain T'' where "e<i:T> |- a : T''" by cases simp_all
+	thus "a[u/i] \<in> IT" by (rule SI2)
+      qed
+      thus "(Abs r $ a $$ as)[u/i] \<in> IT" by simp
+    }
+  qed
+qed
 
-
-subsection {* Main theorem: well-typed terms are strongly normalizing *}
+subsection {* Well-typed terms are strongly normalizing *}
 
 lemma type_implies_IT: "e |- t : T ==> t \<in> IT"
-  apply (erule typing.induct)
-    apply (rule Var_IT)
-   apply (erule IT.Lambda)
-  apply (subgoal_tac "(Var 0 $ lift t 0)[s/0] \<in> IT")
-   apply simp
-  apply (rule subst_type_IT)
-  apply (rule lists.Nil
-    [THEN [2] lists.Cons [THEN IT.Var], unfolded foldl_Nil [THEN eq_reflection]
-      foldl_Cons [THEN eq_reflection]])
-      apply (erule lift_IT)
-     apply (rule typing.App)
-     apply (rule typing.Var)
-     apply simp
-    apply (erule lift_type')
-   apply assumption
-  apply assumption
-  done
+proof -
+  assume "e |- t : T"
+  thus ?thesis
+  proof induct
+    case Var
+    show ?case by (rule Var_IT)
+  next
+    case Abs
+    show ?case by (rule IT.Lambda)
+  next
+    case (App T U e s t)
+    have "(Var 0 $ lift t 0)[s/0] \<in> IT"
+    proof (rule subst_type_IT)
+      have "lift t 0 : IT" by (rule lift_IT)
+      hence "[lift t 0] : lists IT" by (rule lists.Cons) (rule lists.Nil)
+      hence "Var 0 $$ [lift t 0] : IT" by (rule IT.Var)
+      also have "(Var 0 $$ [lift t 0]) = (Var 0 $ lift t 0)" by simp
+      finally show "\<dots> : IT" .
+      have "e<0:T => U> |- Var 0 : T => U"
+	by (rule typing.Var) (simp add: shift_def)
+      moreover have "e<0:T => U> |- lift t 0 : T"
+	by (rule lift_type')
+      ultimately show "e<0:T => U> |- Var 0 $ lift t 0 : U"
+	by (rule typing.App)
+    qed
+    thus ?case by simp
+  qed
+qed
 
 theorem type_implies_termi: "e |- t : T ==> t \<in> termi beta"
-  apply (rule IT_implies_termi)
-  apply (erule type_implies_IT)
-  done
+proof -
+  assume "e |- t : T"
+  hence "t \<in> IT" by (rule type_implies_IT)
+  thus ?thesis by (rule IT_implies_termi)
+qed
 
 end




