# HG changeset patch
# User wenzelm
# Date 1425496599 -3600
# Node ID 3c94c44dfc0f4ae712d993e822332f670bd6ca00
# Parent  0fbed69ff081ce0111a17e0024902acf3f9b974d# Parent  09722854b8f4ef7627206f01418df9938a87801f
merged;

diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f NEWS
--- a/NEWS	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/NEWS	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -258,6 +258,10 @@
 
 *** ML ***
 
+* Elementary operations in module Thm are no longer pervasive.
+INCOMPATIBILITY, need to use qualified Thm.prop_of, Thm.cterm_of,
+Thm.term_of etc.
+
 * Former combinators NAMED_CRITICAL and CRITICAL for central critical
 sections have been discontinued, in favour of the more elementary
 Multithreading.synchronized and its high-level derivative
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/CCL/Wfd.thy
--- a/src/CCL/Wfd.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/CCL/Wfd.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -423,9 +423,9 @@
   | get_bno l n (Bound m) = (m-length(l),n)
 
 (* Not a great way of identifying induction hypothesis! *)
-fun could_IH x = Term.could_unify(x,hd (prems_of @{thm rcallT})) orelse
-                 Term.could_unify(x,hd (prems_of @{thm rcall2T})) orelse
-                 Term.could_unify(x,hd (prems_of @{thm rcall3T}))
+fun could_IH x = Term.could_unify(x,hd (Thm.prems_of @{thm rcallT})) orelse
+                 Term.could_unify(x,hd (Thm.prems_of @{thm rcall2T})) orelse
+                 Term.could_unify(x,hd (Thm.prems_of @{thm rcall3T}))
 
 fun IHinst tac rls = SUBGOAL (fn (Bi,i) =>
   let val bvs = bvars Bi []
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Doc/Isar_Ref/Generic.thy
--- a/src/Doc/Isar_Ref/Generic.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Doc/Isar_Ref/Generic.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -999,7 +999,7 @@
 
 simproc_setup unit ("x::unit") = \<open>
   fn _ => fn _ => fn ct =>
-    if HOLogic.is_unit (term_of ct) then NONE
+    if HOLogic.is_unit (Thm.term_of ct) then NONE
     else SOME (mk_meta_eq @{thm unit_eq})
 \<close>
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/FOL/simpdata.ML
--- a/src/FOL/simpdata.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/FOL/simpdata.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -7,18 +7,19 @@
 
 (*Make meta-equalities.  The operator below is Trueprop*)
 
-fun mk_meta_eq th = case concl_of th of
+fun mk_meta_eq th =
+  (case Thm.concl_of th of
     _ $ (Const(@{const_name eq},_)$_$_)   => th RS @{thm eq_reflection}
   | _ $ (Const(@{const_name iff},_)$_$_) => th RS @{thm iff_reflection}
-  | _                           =>
-  error("conclusion must be a =-equality or <->");;
+  | _ => error "conclusion must be a =-equality or <->");
 
-fun mk_eq th = case concl_of th of
+fun mk_eq th =
+  (case Thm.concl_of th of
     Const(@{const_name Pure.eq},_)$_$_ => th
   | _ $ (Const(@{const_name eq},_)$_$_)   => mk_meta_eq th
   | _ $ (Const(@{const_name iff},_)$_$_) => mk_meta_eq th
   | _ $ (Const(@{const_name Not},_)$_)      => th RS @{thm iff_reflection_F}
-  | _                           => th RS @{thm iff_reflection_T};
+  | _  => th RS @{thm iff_reflection_T});
 
 (*Replace premises x=y, X<->Y by X==Y*)
 fun mk_meta_prems ctxt =
@@ -36,16 +37,17 @@
    (@{const_name All}, [@{thm spec}]), (@{const_name True}, []), (@{const_name False}, [])];
 
 fun mk_atomize pairs =
-  let fun atoms th =
-        (case concl_of th of
-           Const(@{const_name Trueprop},_) $ p =>
-             (case head_of p of
-                Const(a,_) =>
-                  (case AList.lookup (op =) pairs a of
-                     SOME(rls) => maps atoms ([th] RL rls)
-                   | NONE => [th])
-              | _ => [th])
-         | _ => [th])
+  let
+    fun atoms th =
+      (case Thm.concl_of th of
+         Const(@{const_name Trueprop},_) $ p =>
+           (case head_of p of
+              Const(a,_) =>
+                (case AList.lookup (op =) pairs a of
+                   SOME(rls) => maps atoms ([th] RL rls)
+                 | NONE => [th])
+            | _ => [th])
+       | _ => [th])
   in atoms end;
 
 fun mksimps pairs (_: Proof.context) = map mk_eq o mk_atomize pairs o gen_all;
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/FOLP/simp.ML
--- a/src/FOLP/simp.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/FOLP/simp.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
 
 (*insert a thm in a discrimination net by its lhs*)
 fun lhs_insert_thm th net =
-    Net.insert_term eq_brl (lhs_of (concl_of th), (false,th)) net
+    Net.insert_term eq_brl (lhs_of (Thm.concl_of th), (false,th)) net
     handle  Net.INSERT => net;
 
 (*match subgoal i against possible theorems in the net.
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
           biresolve0_tac (Net.unify_term net
                        (lhs_of (Logic.strip_assums_concl prem))) i);
 
-fun nth_subgoal i thm = nth (prems_of thm) (i - 1);
+fun nth_subgoal i thm = nth (Thm.prems_of thm) (i - 1);
 
 fun goal_concl i thm = Logic.strip_assums_concl (nth_subgoal i thm);
 
@@ -111,7 +111,7 @@
 (*Get the norm constants from norm_thms*)
 val norms =
   let fun norm thm =
-      case lhs_of(concl_of thm) of
+      case lhs_of (Thm.concl_of thm) of
           Const(n,_)$_ => n
         | _ => error "No constant in lhs of a norm_thm"
   in map norm normE_thms end;
@@ -145,7 +145,7 @@
 
 (*get name of the constant from conclusion of a congruence rule*)
 fun cong_const cong =
-    case head_of (lhs_of (concl_of cong)) of
+    case head_of (lhs_of (Thm.concl_of cong)) of
         Const(c,_) => c
       | _ => ""                 (*a placeholder distinct from const names*);
 
@@ -189,10 +189,10 @@
 fun add_norms(congs,ccs,new_asms) thm =
 let val thm' = mk_trans2 thm;
 (* thm': [?z -> l; Prems; r -> ?t] ==> ?z -> ?t *)
-    val nops = nprems_of thm'
+    val nops = Thm.nprems_of thm'
     val lhs = rhs_of_eq 1 thm'
     val rhs = lhs_of_eq nops thm'
-    val asms = tl(rev(tl(prems_of thm')))
+    val asms = tl(rev(tl(Thm.prems_of thm')))
     val hvars = fold_rev (add_hidden_vars ccs) (lhs::rhs::asms) []
     val hvars = add_new_asm_vars new_asms (rhs,hvars)
     fun it_asms asm hvars =
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@
 fun add_norm_tags congs =
     let val ccs = map cong_const congs
         val new_asms = filter (exists not o #2)
-                (ccs ~~ (map (map atomic o prems_of) congs));
+                (ccs ~~ (map (map atomic o Thm.prems_of) congs));
     in add_norms(congs,ccs,new_asms) end;
 
 fun normed_rews congs =
@@ -252,7 +252,7 @@
 
 (*insert a thm in a thm net*)
 fun insert_thm_warn th net =
-  Net.insert_term Thm.eq_thm_prop (concl_of th, th) net
+  Net.insert_term Thm.eq_thm_prop (Thm.concl_of th, th) net
   handle Net.INSERT =>
     (writeln ("Duplicate rewrite or congruence rule:\n" ^
         Display.string_of_thm_without_context th); net);
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@
 
 (*delete a thm from a thm net*)
 fun delete_thm_warn th net =
-  Net.delete_term Thm.eq_thm_prop (concl_of th, th) net
+  Net.delete_term Thm.eq_thm_prop (Thm.concl_of th, th) net
   handle Net.DELETE =>
     (writeln ("No such rewrite or congruence rule:\n" ^
         Display.string_of_thm_without_context th); net);
@@ -348,7 +348,7 @@
               | seq_try([],_) thm = no_tac thm
         and try_rew thm = (seq_try(case_rews,case_consts) ORELSE one_subt) thm
         and one_subt thm =
-                let val test = has_fewer_prems (nprems_of thm + 1)
+                let val test = has_fewer_prems (Thm.nprems_of thm + 1)
                     fun loop thm =
                         COND test no_tac
                           ((try_rew THEN DEPTH_FIRST test (refl_tac i))
@@ -424,8 +424,8 @@
     if lhs_is_NORM(thm,i) then (ss, res1(thm,trans_norms,i), anet,ats,cs)
     else case Seq.pull(cong_tac i thm) of
             SOME(thm',_) =>
-                    let val ps = prems_of thm
-                        and ps' = prems_of thm';
+                    let val ps = Thm.prems_of thm
+                        and ps' = Thm.prems_of thm';
                         val n = length(ps')-length(ps);
                         val a = length(Logic.strip_assums_hyp(nth ps (i - 1)))
                         val l = map (length o Logic.strip_assums_hyp) (take n (drop (i-1) ps'));
@@ -436,7 +436,7 @@
       are represented by rules, generalized over their parameters*)
 fun add_asms(ss,thm,a,anet,ats,cs) =
     let val As = strip_varify(nth_subgoal i thm, a, []);
-        val thms = map (Thm.trivial o cterm_of(Thm.theory_of_thm thm)) As;
+        val thms = map (Thm.trivial o Thm.cterm_of(Thm.theory_of_thm thm)) As;
         val new_rws = maps mk_rew_rules thms;
         val rwrls = map mk_trans (maps mk_rew_rules thms);
         val anet' = fold_rev lhs_insert_thm rwrls anet;
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@
 
 fun rew(seq,thm,ss,anet,ats,cs, more) = case Seq.pull seq of
       SOME(thm',seq') =>
-            let val n = (nprems_of thm') - (nprems_of thm)
+            let val n = (Thm.nprems_of thm') - (Thm.nprems_of thm)
             in pr_rew(i,n,thm,thm',more);
                if n=0 then (SIMP_LHS::ss, thm', anet, ats, cs)
                else ((replicate n PROVE) @ (POP_CS::SIMP_LHS::ss),
@@ -499,7 +499,7 @@
 let val cong_tac = net_tac cong_net
 in fn i =>
     (fn thm =>
-     if i <= 0 orelse nprems_of thm < i then Seq.empty
+     if i <= 0 orelse Thm.nprems_of thm < i then Seq.empty
      else Seq.single(execute(ss,fl,auto_tac,cong_tac,simp_net,i,thm)))
     THEN TRY(auto_tac i)
 end;
@@ -547,8 +547,8 @@
 
 fun find_subst sg T =
 let fun find (thm::thms) =
-        let val (Const(_,cT), va, vb) = dest_red(hd(prems_of thm));
-            val [P] = subtract (op =) [va, vb] (Misc_Legacy.add_term_vars (concl_of thm, []));
+        let val (Const(_,cT), va, vb) = dest_red(hd(Thm.prems_of thm));
+            val [P] = subtract (op =) [va, vb] (Misc_Legacy.add_term_vars (Thm.concl_of thm, []));
             val eqT::_ = binder_types cT
         in if Sign.typ_instance sg (T,eqT) then SOME(thm,va,vb,P)
            else find thms
@@ -559,12 +559,12 @@
 fun mk_cong sg (f,aTs,rT) (refl,eq) =
 let val k = length aTs;
     fun ri((subst,va as Var(_,Ta),vb as Var(_,Tb),P),i,si,T,yik) =
-        let val ca = cterm_of sg va
-            and cx = cterm_of sg (eta_Var(("X"^si,0),T))
-            val cb = cterm_of sg vb
-            and cy = cterm_of sg (eta_Var(("Y"^si,0),T))
-            val cP = cterm_of sg P
-            and cp = cterm_of sg (Pinst(f,rT,eq,k,i,T,yik,aTs))
+        let val ca = Thm.cterm_of sg va
+            and cx = Thm.cterm_of sg (eta_Var(("X"^si,0),T))
+            val cb = Thm.cterm_of sg vb
+            and cy = Thm.cterm_of sg (eta_Var(("Y"^si,0),T))
+            val cP = Thm.cterm_of sg P
+            and cp = Thm.cterm_of sg (Pinst(f,rT,eq,k,i,T,yik,aTs))
         in cterm_instantiate [(ca,cx),(cb,cy),(cP,cp)] subst end;
     fun mk(c,T::Ts,i,yik) =
         let val si = radixstring(26,"a",i)
@@ -579,7 +579,7 @@
 fun mk_cong_type sg (f,T) =
 let val (aTs,rT) = strip_type T;
     fun find_refl(r::rs) =
-        let val (Const(eq,eqT),_,_) = dest_red(concl_of r)
+        let val (Const(eq,eqT),_,_) = dest_red(Thm.concl_of r)
         in if Sign.typ_instance sg (rT, hd(binder_types eqT))
            then SOME(r,(eq,body_type eqT)) else find_refl rs
         end
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/FOLP/simpdata.ML
--- a/src/FOLP/simpdata.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/FOLP/simpdata.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -16,7 +16,7 @@
 
 (* Conversion into rewrite rules *)
 
-fun mk_eq th = case concl_of th of
+fun mk_eq th = case Thm.concl_of th of
       _ $ (Const (@{const_name iff}, _) $ _ $ _) $ _ => th
     | _ $ (Const (@{const_name eq}, _) $ _ $ _) $ _ => th
     | _ $ (Const (@{const_name Not}, _) $ _) $ _ => th RS @{thm not_P_imp_P_iff_F}
@@ -32,7 +32,7 @@
 
 fun mk_atomize pairs =
   let fun atoms th =
-        (case concl_of th of
+        (case Thm.concl_of th of
            Const ("Trueprop", _) $ p =>
              (case head_of p of
                 Const(a,_) =>
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Approximation.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Approximation.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Approximation.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -3597,11 +3597,11 @@
         | variable_of_bound t = raise TERM ("variable_of_bound", [t])
 
       val variable_bounds
-        = map (` (variable_of_bound o prop_of)) prems
+        = map (`(variable_of_bound o Thm.prop_of)) prems
 
       fun add_deps (name, bnds)
         = Graph.add_deps_acyclic (name,
-            remove (op =) name (Term.add_free_names (prop_of bnds) []))
+            remove (op =) name (Term.add_free_names (Thm.prop_of bnds) []))
 
       val order = Graph.empty
                   |> fold Graph.new_node variable_bounds
@@ -3634,7 +3634,7 @@
         = case AList.lookup (op =) splitting name
           of SOME s => HOLogic.mk_number @{typ nat} s
            | NONE => @{term "0 :: nat"}
-      val vs = nth (prems_of st) (i - 1)
+      val vs = nth (Thm.prems_of st) (i - 1)
                |> Logic.strip_imp_concl
                |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop
                |> Term.strip_comb |> snd |> List.last
@@ -3659,7 +3659,9 @@
           THEN simp_tac (put_simpset (simpset_of @{context}) ctxt) i) st
        end
 
-     | SOME t => if length vs <> 1 then raise (TERM ("More than one variable used for taylor series expansion", [prop_of st]))
+     | SOME t =>
+       if length vs <> 1
+       then raise (TERM ("More than one variable used for taylor series expansion", [Thm.prop_of st]))
        else let
          val t = t
               |> HOLogic.mk_number @{typ nat}
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Dense_Linear_Order.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Dense_Linear_Order.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Dense_Linear_Order.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -558,20 +558,20 @@
     let
       val [lt, le] = map (Morphism.term phi) [@{term "op \<sqsubset>"}, @{term "op \<sqsubseteq>"}]
       fun h x t =
-        case term_of t of
+        case Thm.term_of t of
           Const(@{const_name HOL.eq}, _)$y$z =>
-            if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Eq
+            if Thm.term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Eq
             else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
        | @{term "Not"}$(Const(@{const_name HOL.eq}, _)$y$z) =>
-            if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.NEq
+            if Thm.term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.NEq
             else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
        | b$y$z => if Term.could_unify (b, lt) then
-                     if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Lt
-                     else if term_of x aconv z then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Gt
+                     if Thm.term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Lt
+                     else if Thm.term_of x aconv z then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Gt
                      else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
                  else if Term.could_unify (b, le) then
-                     if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Le
-                     else if term_of x aconv z then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Ge
+                     if Thm.term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Le
+                     else if Thm.term_of x aconv z then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Ge
                      else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
                  else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
        | _ => Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
@@ -709,7 +709,7 @@
         if h aconvc y then false else if h aconvc x then true else earlier t x y;
 
 fun dest_frac ct =
-  case term_of ct of
+  case Thm.term_of ct of
     Const (@{const_name Fields.divide},_) $ a $ b=>
       Rat.rat_of_quotient (snd (HOLogic.dest_number a), snd (HOLogic.dest_number b))
   | Const(@{const_name inverse}, _)$a => Rat.rat_of_quotient(1, HOLogic.dest_number a |> snd)
@@ -724,21 +724,21 @@
          (Numeral.mk_cnumber cT b)
  end
 
-fun whatis x ct = case term_of ct of
+fun whatis x ct = case Thm.term_of ct of
   Const(@{const_name Groups.plus}, _)$(Const(@{const_name Groups.times},_)$_$y)$_ =>
-     if y aconv term_of x then ("c*x+t",[(funpow 2 Thm.dest_arg1) ct, Thm.dest_arg ct])
+     if y aconv Thm.term_of x then ("c*x+t",[(funpow 2 Thm.dest_arg1) ct, Thm.dest_arg ct])
      else ("Nox",[])
 | Const(@{const_name Groups.plus}, _)$y$_ =>
-     if y aconv term_of x then ("x+t",[Thm.dest_arg ct])
+     if y aconv Thm.term_of x then ("x+t",[Thm.dest_arg ct])
      else ("Nox",[])
 | Const(@{const_name Groups.times}, _)$_$y =>
-     if y aconv term_of x then ("c*x",[Thm.dest_arg1 ct])
+     if y aconv Thm.term_of x then ("c*x",[Thm.dest_arg1 ct])
      else ("Nox",[])
-| t => if t aconv term_of x then ("x",[]) else ("Nox",[]);
+| t => if t aconv Thm.term_of x then ("x",[]) else ("Nox",[]);
 
 fun xnormalize_conv ctxt [] ct = Thm.reflexive ct
 | xnormalize_conv ctxt (vs as (x::_)) ct =
-   case term_of ct of
+   case Thm.term_of ct of
    Const(@{const_name Orderings.less},_)$_$Const(@{const_name Groups.zero},_) =>
     (case whatis x (Thm.dest_arg1 ct) of
     ("c*x+t",[c,t]) =>
@@ -752,14 +752,14 @@
                   (if neg then Thm.apply (Thm.apply clt c) cz
                     else Thm.apply (Thm.apply clt cz) c))
         val cth = Thm.equal_elim (Thm.symmetric cthp) TrueI
-        val th = Thm.implies_elim (instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of_term x)] (map SOME [c,x,t])
+        val th = Thm.implies_elim (instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of_term x)] (map SOME [c,x,t])
              (if neg then @{thm neg_prod_sum_lt} else @{thm pos_prod_sum_lt})) cth
         val rth = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.binop_conv
                    (Semiring_Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv ctxt (earlier vs)))) th
       in rth end
     | ("x+t",[t]) =>
        let
-        val T = ctyp_of_term x
+        val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term x
         val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME x, SOME t] @{thm "sum_lt"}
         val rth = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.binop_conv
               (Semiring_Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv ctxt (earlier vs)))) th
@@ -775,7 +775,7 @@
                   (if neg then Thm.apply (Thm.apply clt c) cz
                     else Thm.apply (Thm.apply clt cz) c))
         val cth = Thm.equal_elim (Thm.symmetric cthp) TrueI
-        val th = Thm.implies_elim (instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of_term x)] (map SOME [c,x])
+        val th = Thm.implies_elim (instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of_term x)] (map SOME [c,x])
              (if neg then @{thm neg_prod_lt} else @{thm pos_prod_lt})) cth
         val rth = th
       in rth end
@@ -786,7 +786,7 @@
    (case whatis x (Thm.dest_arg1 ct) of
     ("c*x+t",[c,t]) =>
        let
-        val T = ctyp_of_term x
+        val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term x
         val cr = dest_frac c
         val clt = Drule.cterm_rule (instantiate' [SOME T] []) @{cpat "op <"}
         val cz = Thm.dest_arg ct
@@ -803,14 +803,14 @@
       in rth end
     | ("x+t",[t]) =>
        let
-        val T = ctyp_of_term x
+        val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term x
         val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME x, SOME t] @{thm "sum_le"}
         val rth = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.binop_conv
               (Semiring_Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv ctxt (earlier vs)))) th
        in  rth end
     | ("c*x",[c]) =>
        let
-        val T = ctyp_of_term x
+        val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term x
         val cr = dest_frac c
         val clt = Drule.cterm_rule (instantiate' [SOME T] []) @{cpat "op <"}
         val cz = Thm.dest_arg ct
@@ -820,7 +820,7 @@
                   (if neg then Thm.apply (Thm.apply clt c) cz
                     else Thm.apply (Thm.apply clt cz) c))
         val cth = Thm.equal_elim (Thm.symmetric cthp) TrueI
-        val th = Thm.implies_elim (instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of_term x)] (map SOME [c,x])
+        val th = Thm.implies_elim (instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of_term x)] (map SOME [c,x])
              (if neg then @{thm neg_prod_le} else @{thm pos_prod_le})) cth
         val rth = th
       in rth end
@@ -830,7 +830,7 @@
    (case whatis x (Thm.dest_arg1 ct) of
     ("c*x+t",[c,t]) =>
        let
-        val T = ctyp_of_term x
+        val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term x
         val cr = dest_frac c
         val ceq = Thm.dest_fun2 ct
         val cz = Thm.dest_arg ct
@@ -845,14 +845,14 @@
       in rth end
     | ("x+t",[t]) =>
        let
-        val T = ctyp_of_term x
+        val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term x
         val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME x, SOME t] @{thm "sum_eq"}
         val rth = Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.binop_conv
               (Semiring_Normalizer.semiring_normalize_ord_conv ctxt (earlier vs)))) th
        in  rth end
     | ("c*x",[c]) =>
        let
-        val T = ctyp_of_term x
+        val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term x
         val cr = dest_frac c
         val ceq = Thm.dest_fun2 ct
         val cz = Thm.dest_arg ct
@@ -871,10 +871,10 @@
   val eq_iff_diff_eq_0 = mk_meta_eq @{thm "eq_iff_diff_eq_0"}
   val ss = simpset_of @{context}
 in
-fun field_isolate_conv phi ctxt vs ct = case term_of ct of
+fun field_isolate_conv phi ctxt vs ct = case Thm.term_of ct of
   Const(@{const_name Orderings.less},_)$a$b =>
    let val (ca,cb) = Thm.dest_binop ct
-       val T = ctyp_of_term ca
+       val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term ca
        val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME ca, SOME cb] less_iff_diff_less_0
        val nth = Conv.fconv_rule
          (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.arg1_conv
@@ -883,7 +883,7 @@
    in rth end
 | Const(@{const_name Orderings.less_eq},_)$a$b =>
    let val (ca,cb) = Thm.dest_binop ct
-       val T = ctyp_of_term ca
+       val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term ca
        val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME ca, SOME cb] le_iff_diff_le_0
        val nth = Conv.fconv_rule
          (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.arg1_conv
@@ -893,7 +893,7 @@
 
 | Const(@{const_name HOL.eq},_)$a$b =>
    let val (ca,cb) = Thm.dest_binop ct
-       val T = ctyp_of_term ca
+       val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term ca
        val th = instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME ca, SOME cb] eq_iff_diff_eq_0
        val nth = Conv.fconv_rule
          (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.arg1_conv
@@ -907,19 +907,21 @@
 fun classfield_whatis phi =
  let
   fun h x t =
-   case term_of t of
-     Const(@{const_name HOL.eq}, _)$y$z => if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Eq
-                            else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
-   | @{term "Not"}$(Const(@{const_name HOL.eq}, _)$y$z) => if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.NEq
-                            else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
+   case Thm.term_of t of
+     Const(@{const_name HOL.eq}, _)$y$z =>
+      if Thm.term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Eq
+      else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
+   | @{term "Not"}$(Const(@{const_name HOL.eq}, _)$y$z) =>
+      if Thm.term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.NEq
+      else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
    | Const(@{const_name Orderings.less},_)$y$z =>
-       if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Lt
-        else if term_of x aconv z then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Gt
-        else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
+       if Thm.term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Lt
+       else if Thm.term_of x aconv z then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Gt
+       else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
    | Const (@{const_name Orderings.less_eq},_)$y$z =>
-         if term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Le
-         else if term_of x aconv z then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Ge
-         else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
+       if Thm.term_of x aconv y then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Le
+       else if Thm.term_of x aconv z then Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Ge
+       else Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
    | _ => Ferrante_Rackoff_Data.Nox
  in h end;
 fun class_field_ss phi =
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Decision_Procs/MIR.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/MIR.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/MIR.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -5655,7 +5655,7 @@
     val vs = map_index swap fs;
     val qe = if proofs then @{code mirlfrqe} else @{code mircfrqe};
     val t' = (term_of_fm vs o qe o fm_of_term vs) t;
-  in (cterm_of thy o HOLogic.mk_Trueprop o HOLogic.mk_eq) (t, t') end
+  in (Thm.cterm_of thy o HOLogic.mk_Trueprop o HOLogic.mk_eq) (t, t') end
 end;
 *}
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Parametric_Ferrante_Rackoff.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Parametric_Ferrante_Rackoff.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/Parametric_Ferrante_Rackoff.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -4156,7 +4156,7 @@
 
   fn (ctxt, alternative, ty, ps, ct) =>
     Proof_Context.cterm_of ctxt
-      (frpar_procedure alternative ty ps (term_of ct))
+      (frpar_procedure alternative ty ps (Thm.term_of ct))
 
 end
 *}
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Decision_Procs/approximation.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/approximation.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/approximation.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
   Proof_Context.cterm_of ctxt term
   |> Goal.init
   |> SINGLE tactic
-  |> the |> prems_of |> hd
+  |> the |> Thm.prems_of |> hd
 
 fun prepare_form ctxt term = apply_tactic ctxt term (
     REPEAT (FIRST' [etac @{thm intervalE}, etac @{thm meta_eqE}, rtac @{thm impI}] 1)
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
 fun approx_arith prec ctxt t = realify t
      |> Proof_Context.cterm_of ctxt
      |> Reification.conv ctxt form_equations
-     |> prop_of
+     |> Thm.prop_of
      |> Logic.dest_equals |> snd
      |> dest_interpret |> fst
      |> mk_approx' prec
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Decision_Procs/approximation_generator.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/approximation_generator.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/approximation_generator.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
   }
 
 fun rewrite_with ctxt thms = Simplifier.rewrite (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt addsimps thms)
-fun conv_term thy conv r = cterm_of thy r |> conv |> Thm.prop_of |> Logic.dest_equals |> snd
+fun conv_term thy conv r = Thm.cterm_of thy r |> conv |> Thm.prop_of |> Logic.dest_equals |> snd
 
 fun approx_random ctxt prec eps frees e xs genuine_only size seed =
   let
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Decision_Procs/commutative_ring_tac.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/commutative_ring_tac.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/commutative_ring_tac.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -78,10 +78,10 @@
         let
           val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt;
           val fs = Misc_Legacy.term_frees eq;
-          val cvs = cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_list T fs);
-          val clhs = cterm_of thy (reif_polex T fs lhs);
-          val crhs = cterm_of thy (reif_polex T fs rhs);
-          val ca = ctyp_of thy T;
+          val cvs = Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_list T fs);
+          val clhs = Thm.cterm_of thy (reif_polex T fs lhs);
+          val crhs = Thm.cterm_of thy (reif_polex T fs rhs);
+          val ca = Thm.ctyp_of thy T;
         in (ca, cvs, clhs, crhs) end
       else error ("reif_eq: not an equation over " ^ Syntax.string_of_sort ctxt cr_sort)
   | reif_eq _ _ = error "reif_eq: not an equation";
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Decision_Procs/cooper_tac.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/cooper_tac.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/cooper_tac.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
       |> fold Simplifier.add_cong @{thms conj_le_cong imp_le_cong}
     (* simp rules for elimination of abs *)
     val simpset3 = put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt |> Splitter.add_split @{thm abs_split}
-    val ct = cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop t)
+    val ct = Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop t)
     (* Theorem for the nat --> int transformation *)
     val pre_thm = Seq.hd (EVERY
       [simp_tac mod_div_simpset 1, simp_tac simpset0 1,
@@ -83,10 +83,10 @@
     fun assm_tac i = REPEAT_DETERM_N nh (assume_tac ctxt i)
     (* The result of the quantifier elimination *)
     val (th, tac) =
-      (case (prop_of pre_thm) of
+      (case Thm.prop_of pre_thm of
         Const (@{const_name Pure.imp}, _) $ (Const (@{const_name Trueprop}, _) $ t1) $ _ =>
           let
-            val pth = linzqe_oracle (cterm_of thy (Envir.eta_long [] t1))
+            val pth = linzqe_oracle (Thm.cterm_of thy (Envir.eta_long [] t1))
           in
             ((pth RS iffD2) RS pre_thm,
               assm_tac (i + 1) THEN (if q then I else TRY) (rtac TrueI i))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Decision_Procs/ferrack_tac.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/ferrack_tac.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/ferrack_tac.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -55,7 +55,7 @@
     val (t,np,nh) = prepare_for_linr q g
     (* Some simpsets for dealing with mod div abs and nat*)
     val simpset0 = put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt addsimps comp_arith
-    val ct = cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop t)
+    val ct = Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop t)
     (* Theorem for the nat --> int transformation *)
    val pre_thm = Seq.hd (EVERY
       [simp_tac simpset0 1,
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
       (Thm.trivial ct))
     fun assm_tac i = REPEAT_DETERM_N nh (assume_tac ctxt i)
     (* The result of the quantifier elimination *)
-    val (th, tac) = case prop_of pre_thm of
+    val (th, tac) = case Thm.prop_of pre_thm of
         Const (@{const_name Pure.imp}, _) $ (Const (@{const_name Trueprop}, _) $ t1) $ _ =>
     let val pth = linr_oracle (ctxt, Envir.eta_long [] t1)
     in 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Decision_Procs/ferrante_rackoff.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/ferrante_rackoff.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/ferrante_rackoff.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -25,14 +25,14 @@
 
 fun get_p1 th =
   funpow 2 (Thm.dest_arg o snd o Thm.dest_abs NONE)
-    (funpow 2 Thm.dest_arg (cprop_of th)) |> Thm.dest_arg
+    (funpow 2 Thm.dest_arg (Thm.cprop_of th)) |> Thm.dest_arg
 
 fun ferrack_conv ctxt
    (entr as ({minf = minf, pinf = pinf, nmi = nmi, npi = npi,
               ld = ld, qe = qe, atoms = atoms},
              {isolate_conv = icv, whatis = wi, simpset = simpset}):entry) =
 let
- fun uset (vars as (x::vs)) p = case term_of p of
+ fun uset (vars as (x::vs)) p = case Thm.term_of p of
    Const(@{const_name HOL.conj}, _)$ _ $ _ =>
      let
        val ((b,l),r) = Thm.dest_comb p |>> Thm.dest_comb
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
 
  val ((p1_v,p2_v),(mp1_v,mp2_v)) =
    funpow 2 (Thm.dest_arg o snd o Thm.dest_abs NONE)
-     (funpow 4 Thm.dest_arg (cprop_of (hd minf)))
+     (funpow 4 Thm.dest_arg (Thm.cprop_of (hd minf)))
    |> Thm.dest_binop |> apply2 Thm.dest_binop |> apfst (apply2 Thm.dest_fun)
 
  fun myfwd (th1, th2, th3, th4, th5) p1 p2
@@ -73,14 +73,14 @@
   in (fw true th1 th_1 th_1', fw false th2 th_2 th_2',
       fw true th3 th_3 th_3', fw false th4 th_4 th_4', fw true th5 th_5 th_5')
   end
- val U_v = (Thm.dest_arg o Thm.dest_arg o Thm.dest_arg1) (cprop_of qe)
+ val U_v = (Thm.dest_arg o Thm.dest_arg o Thm.dest_arg1) (Thm.cprop_of qe)
  fun main vs p =
   let
-   val ((xn,ce),(x,fm)) = (case term_of p of
+   val ((xn,ce),(x,fm)) = (case Thm.term_of p of
                    Const(@{const_name Ex},_)$Abs(xn,xT,_) =>
                         Thm.dest_comb p ||> Thm.dest_abs (SOME xn) |>> pair xn
                  | _ => raise CTERM ("main QE only treats existential quantifiers!", [p]))
-   val cT = ctyp_of_term x
+   val cT = Thm.ctyp_of_term x
    val (u,nth) = uset (x::vs) fm |>> distinct (op aconvc)
    val nthx = Thm.abstract_rule xn x nth
    val q = Thm.rhs_of nth
@@ -97,18 +97,18 @@
      val insI2 = instantiate' [SOME cT] [] @{thm "insertI2"}
    in
     fun provein x S =
-     case term_of S of
+     case Thm.term_of S of
         Const(@{const_name Orderings.bot}, _) => raise CTERM ("provein : not a member!", [S])
       | Const(@{const_name insert}, _) $ y $_ =>
          let val (cy,S') = Thm.dest_binop S
-         in if term_of x aconv y then instantiate' [] [SOME x, SOME S'] insI1
+         in if Thm.term_of x aconv y then instantiate' [] [SOME x, SOME S'] insI1
          else Thm.implies_elim (instantiate' [] [SOME x, SOME S', SOME cy] insI2)
                            (provein x S')
          end
    end
-   val tabU = fold (fn t => fn tab => Termtab.update (term_of t, provein t cU) tab)
+   val tabU = fold (fn t => fn tab => Termtab.update (Thm.term_of t, provein t cU) tab)
                    u Termtab.empty
-   val U = the o Termtab.lookup tabU o term_of
+   val U = the o Termtab.lookup tabU o Thm.term_of
    val [minf_conj, minf_disj, minf_eq, minf_neq, minf_lt,
         minf_le, minf_gt, minf_ge, minf_P] = minf
    val [pinf_conj, pinf_disj, pinf_eq, pinf_neq, pinf_lt,
@@ -121,7 +121,7 @@
         ld_le, ld_gt, ld_ge, ld_P] = map (Drule.instantiate_normalize ([],[(U_v,cU)])) ld
 
    fun decomp_mpinf fm =
-     case term_of fm of
+     case Thm.term_of fm of
        Const(@{const_name HOL.conj},_)$_$_ =>
         let val (p,q) = Thm.dest_binop fm
         in ([p,q], myfwd (minf_conj,pinf_conj, nmi_conj, npi_conj,ld_conj)
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
 val grab_atom_bop =
  let
   fun h bounds tm =
-   (case term_of tm of
+   (case Thm.term_of tm of
      Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, T) $ _ $ _ =>
        if domain_type T = HOLogic.boolT then find_args bounds tm
        else Thm.dest_fun2 tm
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Decision_Procs/langford.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/langford.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/langford.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 val dest_set =
   let
     fun h acc ct =
-      (case term_of ct of
+      (case Thm.term_of ct of
         Const (@{const_name Orderings.bot}, _) => acc
       | Const (@{const_name insert}, _) $ _ $ t => h (Thm.dest_arg1 ct :: acc) (Thm.dest_arg ct));
   in h [] end;
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
       (Simplifier.rewrite (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt addsimps @{thms ball_simps simp_thms})));
 
 fun basic_dloqe ctxt stupid dlo_qeth dlo_qeth_nolb dlo_qeth_noub gather ep =
-  (case term_of ep of
+  (case Thm.term_of ep of
     Const (@{const_name Ex}, _) $ _ =>
       let
         val p = Thm.dest_arg ep
@@ -46,13 +46,13 @@
         fun proveneF S =
           let
             val (a, A) = Thm.dest_comb S |>> Thm.dest_arg
-            val cT = ctyp_of_term a
+            val cT = Thm.ctyp_of_term a
             val ne = instantiate' [SOME cT] [SOME a, SOME A] @{thm insert_not_empty}
             val f = prove_finite cT (dest_set S)
          in (ne, f) end
 
         val qe =
-          (case (term_of L, term_of U) of
+          (case (Thm.term_of L, Thm.term_of U) of
             (Const (@{const_name Orderings.bot}, _),_) =>
               let val (neU, fU) = proveneF U
               in simp_rule ctxt (Thm.transitive ths (dlo_qeth_nolb OF [neU, fU])) end
@@ -70,13 +70,13 @@
 val all_conjuncts =
   let
     fun h acc ct =
-      (case term_of ct of
+      (case Thm.term_of ct of
         @{term HOL.conj} $ _ $ _ => h (h acc (Thm.dest_arg ct)) (Thm.dest_arg1 ct)
       | _ => ct :: acc)
   in h [] end;
 
 fun conjuncts ct =
-  (case term_of ct of
+  (case Thm.term_of ct of
     @{term HOL.conj} $ _ $ _ => Thm.dest_arg1 ct :: conjuncts (Thm.dest_arg ct)
   | _ => [ct]);
 
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
 fun mk_conj_tab th =
   let
     fun h acc th =
-      (case prop_of th of
+      (case Thm.prop_of th of
         @{term "Trueprop"} $ (@{term HOL.conj} $ p $ q) =>
           h (h acc (th RS conjunct2)) (th RS conjunct1)
       | @{term "Trueprop"} $ p => (p, th) :: acc)
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@
 fun prove_conj tab cjs =
   (case cjs of
     [c] =>
-      if is_conj (term_of c)
+      if is_conj (Thm.term_of c)
       then prove_conj tab (conjuncts c)
       else tab c
   | c :: cs => conjI OF [prove_conj tab [c], prove_conj tab cs]);
@@ -108,8 +108,8 @@
 fun conj_aci_rule eq =
   let
     val (l, r) = Thm.dest_equals eq
-    fun tabl c = the (Termtab.lookup (mk_conj_tab (Thm.assume l)) (term_of c))
-    fun tabr c = the (Termtab.lookup (mk_conj_tab (Thm.assume r)) (term_of c))
+    fun tabl c = the (Termtab.lookup (mk_conj_tab (Thm.assume l)) (Thm.term_of c))
+    fun tabr c = the (Termtab.lookup (mk_conj_tab (Thm.assume r)) (Thm.term_of c))
     val ll = Thm.dest_arg l
     val rr = Thm.dest_arg r
     val thl  = prove_conj tabl (conjuncts rr) |> Drule.implies_intr_hyps
@@ -118,18 +118,18 @@
   in Thm.implies_elim (Thm.implies_elim eqI thl) thr |> mk_meta_eq end;
 
 fun contains x ct =
-  member (op aconv) (Misc_Legacy.term_frees (term_of ct)) (term_of x);
+  member (op aconv) (Misc_Legacy.term_frees (Thm.term_of ct)) (Thm.term_of x);
 
 fun is_eqx x eq =
-  (case term_of eq of
+  (case Thm.term_of eq of
     Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ l $ r =>
-      l aconv term_of x orelse r aconv term_of x
+      l aconv Thm.term_of x orelse r aconv Thm.term_of x
   | _ => false);
 
 local
 
 fun proc ctxt ct =
-  (case term_of ct of
+  (case Thm.term_of ct of
     Const (@{const_name Ex}, _) $ Abs (xn, _, _) =>
       let
         val e = Thm.dest_fun ct
@@ -198,7 +198,7 @@
 val grab_atom_bop =
   let
     fun h bounds tm =
-      (case term_of tm of
+      (case Thm.term_of tm of
         Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, T) $ _ $ _ =>
           if domain_type T = HOLogic.boolT then find_args bounds tm
           else Thm.dest_fun2 tm
@@ -231,8 +231,8 @@
 fun generalize_tac f = CSUBGOAL (fn (p, _) => PRIMITIVE (fn st =>
   let
     fun all T = Drule.cterm_rule (instantiate' [SOME T] []) @{cpat "Pure.all"}
-    fun gen x t = Thm.apply (all (ctyp_of_term x)) (Thm.lambda x t)
-    val ts = sort (fn (a,b) => Term_Ord.fast_term_ord (term_of a, term_of b)) (f p)
+    fun gen x t = Thm.apply (all (Thm.ctyp_of_term x)) (Thm.lambda x t)
+    val ts = sort (fn (a,b) => Term_Ord.fast_term_ord (Thm.term_of a, Thm.term_of b)) (f p)
     val p' = fold_rev gen ts p
   in Thm.implies_intr p' (Thm.implies_elim st (fold Thm.forall_elim ts (Thm.assume p'))) end));
 
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@
   let
     val ins = insert (op aconvc)
     fun h acc t =
-      (case (term_of t) of
+      (case Thm.term_of t of
         _ $ _ $ _ =>
           if member (op aconvc) ats (Thm.dest_fun2 t)
           then ins (Thm.dest_arg t) (ins (Thm.dest_arg1 t) acc)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Decision_Procs/mir_tac.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/mir_tac.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Decision_Procs/mir_tac.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -101,7 +101,7 @@
                 @{thm "int_0"}, @{thm "int_1"}]
       |> fold Simplifier.add_cong [@{thm "conj_le_cong"}, @{thm "imp_le_cong"}]
     (* simp rules for elimination of abs *)
-    val ct = cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop t)
+    val ct = Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop t)
     (* Theorem for the nat --> int transformation *)
     val pre_thm = Seq.hd (EVERY
       [simp_tac mod_div_simpset 1, simp_tac simpset0 1,
@@ -110,13 +110,14 @@
       (Thm.trivial ct))
     fun assm_tac i = REPEAT_DETERM_N nh (assume_tac ctxt i)
     (* The result of the quantifier elimination *)
-    val (th, tac) = case (prop_of pre_thm) of
+    val (th, tac) =
+      case Thm.prop_of pre_thm of
         Const (@{const_name Pure.imp}, _) $ (Const (@{const_name Trueprop}, _) $ t1) $ _ =>
     let val pth =
           (* If quick_and_dirty then run without proof generation as oracle*)
              if Config.get ctxt quick_and_dirty
-             then mirfr_oracle (false, cterm_of thy (Envir.eta_long [] t1))
-             else mirfr_oracle (true, cterm_of thy (Envir.eta_long [] t1))
+             then mirfr_oracle (false, Thm.cterm_of thy (Envir.eta_long [] t1))
+             else mirfr_oracle (true, Thm.cterm_of thy (Envir.eta_long [] t1))
     in 
        ((pth RS iffD2) RS pre_thm,
         assm_tac (i + 1) THEN (if q then I else TRY) (rtac TrueI i))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Enum.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Enum.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Enum.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -563,12 +563,14 @@
 by(cases x) simp
 
 simproc_setup finite_1_eq ("x::finite_1") = {*
-  fn _ => fn _ => fn ct => case term_of ct of
-    Const (@{const_name a\<^sub>1}, _) => NONE
-  | _ => SOME (mk_meta_eq @{thm finite_1_eq})
+  fn _ => fn _ => fn ct =>
+    (case Thm.term_of ct of
+      Const (@{const_name a\<^sub>1}, _) => NONE
+    | _ => SOME (mk_meta_eq @{thm finite_1_eq}))
 *}
 
-instantiation finite_1 :: complete_boolean_algebra begin
+instantiation finite_1 :: complete_boolean_algebra
+begin
 definition [simp]: "op - = (\<lambda>_ _. a\<^sub>1)"
 definition [simp]: "uminus = (\<lambda>_. a\<^sub>1)"
 instance by intro_classes simp_all
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/HOL.thy
--- a/src/HOL/HOL.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/HOL.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -1193,14 +1193,14 @@
 simproc_setup let_simp ("Let x f") = {*
 let
   val (f_Let_unfold, x_Let_unfold) =
-    let val [(_ $ (f $ x) $ _)] = prems_of @{thm Let_unfold}
-    in (cterm_of @{theory} f, cterm_of @{theory} x) end
+    let val [(_ $ (f $ x) $ _)] = Thm.prems_of @{thm Let_unfold}
+    in (Thm.cterm_of @{theory} f, Thm.cterm_of @{theory} x) end
   val (f_Let_folded, x_Let_folded) =
-    let val [(_ $ (f $ x) $ _)] = prems_of @{thm Let_folded}
-    in (cterm_of @{theory} f, cterm_of @{theory} x) end;
+    let val [(_ $ (f $ x) $ _)] = Thm.prems_of @{thm Let_folded}
+    in (Thm.cterm_of @{theory} f, Thm.cterm_of @{theory} x) end;
   val g_Let_folded =
-    let val [(_ $ _ $ (g $ _))] = prems_of @{thm Let_folded}
-    in cterm_of @{theory} g end;
+    let val [(_ $ _ $ (g $ _))] = Thm.prems_of @{thm Let_folded}
+    in Thm.cterm_of @{theory} g end;
   fun count_loose (Bound i) k = if i >= k then 1 else 0
     | count_loose (s $ t) k = count_loose s k + count_loose t k
     | count_loose (Abs (_, _, t)) k = count_loose  t (k + 1)
@@ -1222,11 +1222,11 @@
       else
         let
           val n = case f of (Abs (x, _, _)) => x | _ => "x";
-          val cx = cterm_of thy x;
-          val {T = xT, ...} = rep_cterm cx;
-          val cf = cterm_of thy f;
+          val cx = Thm.cterm_of thy x;
+          val {T = xT, ...} = Thm.rep_cterm cx;
+          val cf = Thm.cterm_of thy f;
           val fx_g = Simplifier.rewrite ctxt (Thm.apply cf cx);
-          val (_ $ _ $ g) = prop_of fx_g;
+          val (_ $ _ $ g) = Thm.prop_of fx_g;
           val g' = abstract_over (x,g);
           val abs_g'= Abs (n,xT,g');
         in (if (g aconv g')
@@ -1238,10 +1238,10 @@
              else if (Envir.beta_eta_contract f) aconv (Envir.beta_eta_contract abs_g') then NONE (*avoid identity conversion*)
              else let
                    val g'x = abs_g'$x;
-                   val g_g'x = Thm.symmetric (Thm.beta_conversion false (cterm_of thy g'x));
+                   val g_g'x = Thm.symmetric (Thm.beta_conversion false (Thm.cterm_of thy g'x));
                    val rl = cterm_instantiate
-                             [(f_Let_folded, cterm_of thy f), (x_Let_folded, cx),
-                              (g_Let_folded, cterm_of thy abs_g')]
+                             [(f_Let_folded, Thm.cterm_of thy f), (x_Let_folded, cx),
+                              (g_Let_folded, Thm.cterm_of thy abs_g')]
                              @{thm Let_folded};
                  in SOME (rl OF [Thm.transitive fx_g g_g'x])
                  end)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/HOLCF/Cfun.thy
--- a/src/HOL/HOLCF/Cfun.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/HOLCF/Cfun.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
     let
       val dest = Thm.dest_comb;
       val f = (snd o dest o snd o dest) ct;
-      val [T, U] = Thm.dest_ctyp (ctyp_of_term f);
+      val [T, U] = Thm.dest_ctyp (Thm.ctyp_of_term f);
       val tr = instantiate' [SOME T, SOME U] [SOME f]
           (mk_meta_eq @{thm Abs_cfun_inverse2});
       val rules = Named_Theorems.get ctxt @{named_theorems cont2cont};
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/HOLCF/Tools/Domain/domain_constructors.ML
--- a/src/HOL/HOLCF/Tools/Domain/domain_constructors.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/HOLCF/Tools/Domain/domain_constructors.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -135,7 +135,7 @@
   fun beta_of_def thy def_thm =
       let
         val (con, lam) =
-          Logic.dest_equals (Logic.unvarify_global (concl_of def_thm))
+          Logic.dest_equals (Logic.unvarify_global (Thm.concl_of def_thm))
         val (args, rhs) = arglist lam
         val lhs = list_ccomb (con, args)
         val goal = mk_equals (lhs, rhs)
@@ -211,7 +211,7 @@
             val (n1, t1) = args2typ n (snd con)
             val (n2, t2) = cons2typ n1 cons
           in (n2, mk_ssumT (t1, t2)) end
-      val ct = ctyp_of thy (snd (cons2typ 1 spec'))
+      val ct = Thm.ctyp_of thy (snd (cons2typ 1 spec'))
       val thm1 = instantiate' [SOME ct] [] @{thm exh_start}
       val thm2 = rewrite_rule (Proof_Context.init_global thy)
         (map mk_meta_eq @{thms ex_bottom_iffs}) thm1
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/HOLCF/Tools/cont_proc.ML
--- a/src/HOL/HOLCF/Tools/cont_proc.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/HOLCF/Tools/cont_proc.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
   fun solve_cont ctxt t =
     let
       val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
-      val tr = instantiate' [] [SOME (cterm_of thy t)] @{thm Eq_TrueI}
+      val tr = instantiate' [] [SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy t)] @{thm Eq_TrueI}
     in Option.map fst (Seq.pull (cont_tac ctxt 1 tr)) end
 in
   fun cont_proc thy =
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/HOLCF/Tools/fixrec.ML
--- a/src/HOL/HOLCF/Tools/fixrec.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/HOLCF/Tools/fixrec.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -100,7 +100,7 @@
   | name_of t = raise TERM ("Fixrec.add_unfold: lhs not a constant", [t])
 
 val lhs_name =
-  name_of o head_of o fst o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of
+  name_of o head_of o fst o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of
 
 in
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Import/import_data.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Import/import_data.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Import/import_data.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
     val th = Thm.legacy_freezeT th
     val name = case name_opt of
          NONE => (fst o dest_Const o fst o HOLogic.dest_eq o
-           HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) th
+           HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) th
        | SOME n => n
     val thy' = add_const_map s name thy
   in
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
 fun add_typ_def tyname absname repname th thy =
   let
     val th = Thm.legacy_freezeT th
-    val (l, _) = dest_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (prop_of th))
+    val (l, _) = dest_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.prop_of th))
     val (l, abst) = dest_comb l
     val (_, rept) = dest_comb l
     val (absn, _) = dest_Const abst
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Import/import_rule.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Import/import_rule.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Import/import_rule.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
 fun meta_mp th1 th2 =
   let
     val th1a = implies_elim_all th1
-    val th1b = Thm.implies_intr (strip_imp_concl (cprop_of th2)) th1a
+    val th1b = Thm.implies_intr (strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of th2)) th1a
     val th2a = implies_elim_all th2
     val th3 = Thm.implies_elim th1b th2a
   in
@@ -53,8 +53,8 @@
 
 fun meta_eq_to_obj_eq th =
   let
-    val (tml, tmr) = Thm.dest_binop (strip_imp_concl (cprop_of th))
-    val cty = ctyp_of_term tml
+    val (tml, tmr) = Thm.dest_binop (strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of th))
+    val cty = Thm.ctyp_of_term tml
     val i = Drule.instantiate' [SOME cty] [SOME tml, SOME tmr]
       @{thm meta_eq_to_obj_eq}
   in
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
 
 fun eq_mp th1 th2 =
   let
-    val (tm1l, tm1r) = Thm.dest_binop (Thm.dest_arg (strip_imp_concl (cprop_of th1)))
+    val (tm1l, tm1r) = Thm.dest_binop (Thm.dest_arg (strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of th1)))
     val i1 = Drule.instantiate' [] [SOME tm1l, SOME tm1r] @{thm iffD1}
     val i2 = meta_mp i1 th1
   in
@@ -74,11 +74,11 @@
 
 fun comb th1 th2 =
   let
-    val t1c = Thm.dest_arg (strip_imp_concl (cprop_of th1))
-    val t2c = Thm.dest_arg (strip_imp_concl (cprop_of th2))
+    val t1c = Thm.dest_arg (strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of th1))
+    val t2c = Thm.dest_arg (strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of th2))
     val (cf, cg) = Thm.dest_binop t1c
     val (cx, cy) = Thm.dest_binop t2c
-    val [fd, fr] = Thm.dest_ctyp (ctyp_of_term cf)
+    val [fd, fr] = Thm.dest_ctyp (Thm.ctyp_of_term cf)
     val i1 = Drule.instantiate' [SOME fd, SOME fr]
       [SOME cf, SOME cg, SOME cx, SOME cy] @{thm cong}
     val i2 = meta_mp i1 th1
@@ -88,11 +88,11 @@
 
 fun trans th1 th2 =
   let
-    val t1c = Thm.dest_arg (strip_imp_concl (cprop_of th1))
-    val t2c = Thm.dest_arg (strip_imp_concl (cprop_of th2))
+    val t1c = Thm.dest_arg (strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of th1))
+    val t2c = Thm.dest_arg (strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of th2))
     val (r, s) = Thm.dest_binop t1c
     val (_, t) = Thm.dest_binop t2c
-    val ty = ctyp_of_term r
+    val ty = Thm.ctyp_of_term r
     val i1 = Drule.instantiate' [SOME ty] [SOME r, SOME s, SOME t] @{thm trans}
     val i2 = meta_mp i1 th1
   in
@@ -101,17 +101,17 @@
 
 fun deduct th1 th2 =
   let
-    val th1c = strip_imp_concl (cprop_of th1)
-    val th2c = strip_imp_concl (cprop_of th2)
+    val th1c = strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of th1)
+    val th2c = strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of th2)
     val th1a = implies_elim_all th1
     val th2a = implies_elim_all th2
     val th1b = Thm.implies_intr th2c th1a
     val th2b = Thm.implies_intr th1c th2a
     val i = Drule.instantiate' []
       [SOME (Thm.dest_arg th1c), SOME (Thm.dest_arg th2c)] @{thm iffI}
-    val i1 = Thm.implies_elim i (Thm.assume (cprop_of th2b))
+    val i1 = Thm.implies_elim i (Thm.assume (Thm.cprop_of th2b))
     val i2 = Thm.implies_elim i1 th1b
-    val i3 = Thm.implies_intr (cprop_of th2b) i2
+    val i3 = Thm.implies_intr (Thm.cprop_of th2b) i2
     val i4 = Thm.implies_elim i3 th2b
   in
     implies_intr_hyps i4
@@ -119,7 +119,7 @@
 
 fun conj1 th =
   let
-    val (tml, tmr) = Thm.dest_binop (Thm.dest_arg (strip_imp_concl (cprop_of th)))
+    val (tml, tmr) = Thm.dest_binop (Thm.dest_arg (strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of th)))
     val i = Drule.instantiate' [] [SOME tml, SOME tmr] @{thm conjunct1}
   in
     meta_mp i th
@@ -127,7 +127,7 @@
 
 fun conj2 th =
   let
-    val (tml, tmr) = Thm.dest_binop (Thm.dest_arg (strip_imp_concl (cprop_of th)))
+    val (tml, tmr) = Thm.dest_binop (Thm.dest_arg (strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of th)))
     val i = Drule.instantiate' [] [SOME tml, SOME tmr] @{thm conjunct2}
   in
     meta_mp i th
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
 fun abs cv th =
   let
     val th1 = implies_elim_all th
-    val (tl, tr) = Thm.dest_binop (Thm.dest_arg (strip_imp_concl (cprop_of th1)))
+    val (tl, tr) = Thm.dest_binop (Thm.dest_arg (strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of th1)))
     val (ll, lr) = (Thm.lambda cv tl, Thm.lambda cv tr)
     val (al, ar) = (Thm.apply ll cv, Thm.apply lr cv)
     val bl = beta al
@@ -151,7 +151,7 @@
     val th2 = trans (trans bl th1) br
     val th3 = implies_elim_all th2
     val th4 = Thm.forall_intr cv th3
-    val i = Drule.instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of_term cv), SOME (ctyp_of_term tl)]
+    val i = Drule.instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of_term cv), SOME (Thm.ctyp_of_term tl)]
       [SOME ll, SOME lr] @{thm ext2}
   in
     meta_mp i th4
@@ -159,18 +159,18 @@
 
 fun freezeT thm =
   let
-    val tvars = Term.add_tvars (prop_of thm) []
+    val tvars = Term.add_tvars (Thm.prop_of thm) []
     val tfrees = map (fn ((t, _), s) => TFree (t, s)) tvars
     val tvars = map TVar tvars
     val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm thm
-    fun inst ty = ctyp_of thy ty
+    fun inst ty = Thm.ctyp_of thy ty
   in
     Thm.instantiate ((map inst tvars ~~ map inst tfrees), []) thm
   end
 
 fun def' constname rhs thy =
   let
-    val rhs = term_of rhs
+    val rhs = Thm.term_of rhs
     val typ = type_of rhs
     val constbinding = Binding.name constname
     val thy1 = Sign.add_consts [(constbinding, typ, NoSyn)] thy
@@ -199,23 +199,24 @@
 
 fun typedef_hollight th thy =
   let
-    val (th_s, cn) = Thm.dest_comb (Thm.dest_arg (cprop_of th))
+    val (th_s, cn) = Thm.dest_comb (Thm.dest_arg (Thm.cprop_of th))
     val (th_s, abst) = Thm.dest_comb th_s
     val rept = Thm.dest_arg th_s
     val P = Thm.dest_arg cn
-    val [nty, oty] = Thm.dest_ctyp (ctyp_of_term rept)
+    val [nty, oty] = Thm.dest_ctyp (Thm.ctyp_of_term rept)
   in
     Drule.instantiate' [SOME nty, SOME oty] [SOME rept, SOME abst, SOME P,
-      SOME (cterm_of thy (Free ("a", typ_of nty))),
-      SOME (cterm_of thy (Free ("r", typ_of oty)))] @{thm typedef_hol2hollight}
+      SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy (Free ("a", Thm.typ_of nty))),
+      SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy (Free ("r", Thm.typ_of oty)))] @{thm typedef_hol2hollight}
   end
 
 fun tydef' tycname abs_name rep_name cP ct td_th thy =
   let
-    val ctT = ctyp_of_term ct
+    val ctT = Thm.ctyp_of_term ct
     val nonempty = Drule.instantiate' [SOME ctT] [SOME cP, SOME ct] @{thm light_ex_imp_nonempty}
     val th2 = meta_mp nonempty td_th
-    val c = case concl_of th2 of
+    val c =
+      case Thm.concl_of th2 of
         _ $ (Const(@{const_name Ex},_) $ Abs(_,_,Const(@{const_name Set.member},_) $ _ $ c)) => c
       | _ => error "type_introduction: bad type definition theorem"
     val tfrees = Term.add_tfrees c []
@@ -225,15 +226,15 @@
        (SOME (Binding.name rep_name, Binding.name abs_name)) (fn _ => rtac th2 1) thy
     val aty = #abs_type (#1 typedef_info)
     val th = freezeT (#type_definition (#2 typedef_info))
-    val (th_s, _) = Thm.dest_comb (Thm.dest_arg (cprop_of th))
+    val (th_s, _) = Thm.dest_comb (Thm.dest_arg (Thm.cprop_of th))
     val (th_s, abst) = Thm.dest_comb th_s
     val rept = Thm.dest_arg th_s
-    val [nty, oty] = Thm.dest_ctyp (ctyp_of_term rept)
+    val [nty, oty] = Thm.dest_ctyp (Thm.ctyp_of_term rept)
     val typedef_th =
        Drule.instantiate'
           [SOME nty, SOME oty]
-          [SOME rept, SOME abst, SOME cP, SOME (cterm_of thy' (Free ("a", aty))),
-             SOME (cterm_of thy' (Free ("r", typ_of ctT)))]
+          [SOME rept, SOME abst, SOME cP, SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy' (Free ("a", aty))),
+             SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy' (Free ("r", Thm.typ_of ctT)))]
           @{thm typedef_hol2hollight}
     val th4 = typedef_th OF [#type_definition (#2 typedef_info)]
   in
@@ -259,14 +260,14 @@
   let
     fun assoc _ [] = error "assoc"
       | assoc x ((x',y)::rest) = if x = x' then y else assoc x rest
-    val lambda = map (fn (a, b) => (typ_of a, b)) lambda
-    val tys_before = Term.add_tfrees (prop_of th) []
+    val lambda = map (fn (a, b) => (Thm.typ_of a, b)) lambda
+    val tys_before = Term.add_tfrees (Thm.prop_of th) []
     val th1 = Thm.varifyT_global th
-    val tys_after = Term.add_tvars (prop_of th1) []
+    val tys_after = Term.add_tvars (Thm.prop_of th1) []
     val tyinst = map2 (fn bef => fn iS =>
        (case try (assoc (TFree bef)) lambda of
-              SOME cty => (ctyp_of thy (TVar iS), cty)
-            | NONE => (ctyp_of thy (TVar iS), ctyp_of thy (TFree bef))
+              SOME cty => (Thm.ctyp_of thy (TVar iS), cty)
+            | NONE => (Thm.ctyp_of thy (TVar iS), Thm.ctyp_of thy (TFree bef))
        )) tys_before tys_after
   in
     Thm.instantiate (tyinst,[]) th1
@@ -328,12 +329,12 @@
 fun store_thm binding thm thy =
   let
     val thm = Drule.export_without_context_open thm
-    val tvs = Term.add_tvars (prop_of thm) []
+    val tvs = Term.add_tvars (Thm.prop_of thm) []
     val tns = map (fn (_, _) => "'") tvs
     val nms = fst (fold_map Name.variant tns (Variable.names_of (Proof_Context.init_global thy)))
     val vs = map TVar ((nms ~~ (map (snd o fst) tvs)) ~~ (map snd tvs))
-    val cvs = map (ctyp_of thy) vs
-    val ctvs = map (ctyp_of thy) (map TVar tvs)
+    val cvs = map (Thm.ctyp_of thy) vs
+    val ctvs = map (Thm.ctyp_of thy) (map TVar tvs)
     val thm' = Thm.instantiate ((ctvs ~~ cvs), []) thm
   in
     snd (Global_Theory.add_thm ((binding, thm'), []) thy)
@@ -410,14 +411,14 @@
           end
       | process (thy, state) (#"Y", [name, _, _]) = setth (mtydef name thy) (thy, state)
       | process (thy, state) (#"t", [n]) =
-          setty (ctyp_of thy (TFree ("'" ^ (transl_qm n), @{sort type}))) (thy, state)
+          setty (Thm.ctyp_of thy (TFree ("'" ^ (transl_qm n), @{sort type}))) (thy, state)
       | process (thy, state) (#"a", n :: l) =
           fold_map getty l (thy, state) |>>
-            (fn tys => ctyp_of thy (Type (gettyname n thy, map typ_of tys))) |-> setty
+            (fn tys => Thm.ctyp_of thy (Type (gettyname n thy, map Thm.typ_of tys))) |-> setty
       | process (thy, state) (#"v", [n, ty]) =
-          getty ty (thy, state) |>> (fn ty => cterm_of thy (Free (transl_dot n, typ_of ty))) |-> settm
+          getty ty (thy, state) |>> (fn ty => Thm.cterm_of thy (Free (transl_dot n, Thm.typ_of ty))) |-> settm
       | process (thy, state) (#"c", [n, ty]) =
-          getty ty (thy, state) |>> (fn ty => cterm_of thy (Const (getconstname n thy, typ_of ty))) |-> settm
+          getty ty (thy, state) |>> (fn ty => Thm.cterm_of thy (Const (getconstname n thy, Thm.typ_of ty))) |-> settm
       | process tstate (#"f", [t1, t2]) =
           gettm t1 tstate ||>> gettm t2 |>> (fn (t1, t2) => Thm.apply t1 t2) |-> settm
       | process tstate (#"l", [t1, t2]) =
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Int.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Int.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Int.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -753,7 +753,7 @@
 simproc_setup fast_arith ("(m::'a::linordered_idom) < n" |
   "(m::'a::linordered_idom) <= n" |
   "(m::'a::linordered_idom) = n") =
-  {* fn _ => fn ss => fn ct => Lin_Arith.simproc ss (term_of ct) *}
+  {* fn _ => fn ss => fn ct => Lin_Arith.simproc ss (Thm.term_of ct) *}
 
 
 subsection{*More Inequality Reasoning*}
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Library/Code_Abstract_Nat.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Library/Code_Abstract_Nat.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Library/Code_Abstract_Nat.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -59,10 +59,10 @@
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt;
     val vname = singleton (Name.variant_list (map fst
       (fold (Term.add_var_names o Thm.full_prop_of) thms []))) "n";
-    val cv = cterm_of thy (Var ((vname, 0), HOLogic.natT));
-    val lhs_of = snd o Thm.dest_comb o fst o Thm.dest_comb o cprop_of;
-    val rhs_of = snd o Thm.dest_comb o cprop_of;
-    fun find_vars ct = (case term_of ct of
+    val cv = Thm.cterm_of thy (Var ((vname, 0), HOLogic.natT));
+    val lhs_of = snd o Thm.dest_comb o fst o Thm.dest_comb o Thm.cprop_of;
+    val rhs_of = snd o Thm.dest_comb o Thm.cprop_of;
+    fun find_vars ct = (case Thm.term_of ct of
         (Const (@{const_name Suc}, _) $ Var _) => [(cv, snd (Thm.dest_comb ct))]
       | _ $ _ =>
         let val (ct1, ct2) = Thm.dest_comb ct
@@ -79,7 +79,7 @@
           Thm.implies_elim
            (Conv.fconv_rule (Thm.beta_conversion true)
              (Drule.instantiate'
-               [SOME (ctyp_of_term ct)] [SOME (Thm.lambda cv ct),
+               [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of_term ct)] [SOME (Thm.lambda cv ct),
                  SOME (Thm.lambda cv' (rhs_of thm)), NONE, SOME cv']
                Suc_if_eq)) (Thm.forall_intr cv' thm)
       in
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
 
 fun eqn_suc_base_preproc ctxt thms =
   let
-    val dest = fst o Logic.dest_equals o prop_of;
+    val dest = fst o Logic.dest_equals o Thm.prop_of;
     val contains_suc = exists_Const (fn (c, _) => c = @{const_name Suc});
   in
     if forall (can dest) thms andalso exists (contains_suc o dest) thms
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Library/Countable.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Library/Countable.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Library/Countable.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -171,7 +171,7 @@
         val typedef_info = hd (Typedef.get_info ctxt ty_name)
         val typedef_thm = #type_definition (snd typedef_info)
         val pred_name =
-          (case HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of typedef_thm) of
+          (case HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of typedef_thm) of
             (_ $ _ $ _ $ (_ $ Const (n, _))) => n
           | _ => raise Match)
         val induct_info = Inductive.the_inductive ctxt pred_name
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Library/Extended_Nat.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Library/Extended_Nat.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Library/Extended_Nat.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -561,15 +561,15 @@
 
 simproc_setup enat_eq_cancel
   ("(l::enat) + m = n" | "(l::enat) = m + n") =
-  {* fn phi => fn ctxt => fn ct => Eq_Enat_Cancel.proc ctxt (term_of ct) *}
+  {* fn phi => fn ctxt => fn ct => Eq_Enat_Cancel.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct) *}
 
 simproc_setup enat_le_cancel
   ("(l::enat) + m \<le> n" | "(l::enat) \<le> m + n") =
-  {* fn phi => fn ctxt => fn ct => Le_Enat_Cancel.proc ctxt (term_of ct) *}
+  {* fn phi => fn ctxt => fn ct => Le_Enat_Cancel.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct) *}
 
 simproc_setup enat_less_cancel
   ("(l::enat) + m < n" | "(l::enat) < m + n") =
-  {* fn phi => fn ctxt => fn ct => Less_Enat_Cancel.proc ctxt (term_of ct) *}
+  {* fn phi => fn ctxt => fn ct => Less_Enat_Cancel.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct) *}
 
 text {* TODO: add regression tests for these simprocs *}
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Library/Reflection.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Library/Reflection.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Library/Reflection.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
   val rulesN = "rules";
   val any_keyword = keyword onlyN || keyword rulesN;
   val thms = Scan.repeat (Scan.unless any_keyword Attrib.multi_thm) >> flat;
-  val terms = thms >> map (term_of o Drule.dest_term);
+  val terms = thms >> map (Thm.term_of o Drule.dest_term);
 in
   thms -- Scan.optional (keyword rulesN |-- thms) [] --
     Scan.option (keyword onlyN |-- Args.term) >>
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Library/Sum_of_Squares/positivstellensatz_tools.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Library/Sum_of_Squares/positivstellensatz_tools.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Library/Sum_of_Squares/positivstellensatz_tools.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
 
 fun string_of_varpow x k =
   let
-    val term = term_of x
+    val term = Thm.term_of x
     val name =
       (case term of
         Free (n, _) => n
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Library/Sum_of_Squares/sum_of_squares.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Library/Sum_of_Squares/sum_of_squares.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Library/Sum_of_Squares/sum_of_squares.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -234,7 +234,7 @@
   val div_tm = @{cterm "op / :: real => _"}
   val pow_tm = @{cterm "op ^ :: real => _"}
   val zero_tm = @{cterm "0:: real"}
-  val is_numeral = can (HOLogic.dest_number o term_of)
+  val is_numeral = can (HOLogic.dest_number o Thm.term_of)
   fun poly_of_term tm =
     if tm aconvc zero_tm then poly_0
     else
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@
               val (opr,l) = Thm.dest_comb lop
             in
               if opr aconvc pow_tm andalso is_numeral r
-              then poly_pow (poly_of_term l) ((snd o HOLogic.dest_number o term_of) r)
+              then poly_pow (poly_of_term l) ((snd o HOLogic.dest_number o Thm.term_of) r)
               else if opr aconvc add_tm
               then poly_add (poly_of_term l) (poly_of_term r)
               else if opr aconvc sub_tm
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@
         end handle CTERM ("dest_comb",_) => poly_var tm)
 in
   val poly_of_term = fn tm =>
-    if type_of (term_of tm) = @{typ real}
+    if type_of (Thm.term_of tm) = @{typ real}
     then poly_of_term tm
     else error "poly_of_term: term does not have real type"
 end;
@@ -779,8 +779,8 @@
 (* Interface to HOL.                                                         *)
 local
   open Conv
-  val concl = Thm.dest_arg o cprop_of
-  fun simple_cterm_ord t u = Term_Ord.fast_term_ord (term_of t, term_of u) = LESS
+  val concl = Thm.dest_arg o Thm.cprop_of
+  fun simple_cterm_ord t u = Term_Ord.fast_term_ord (Thm.term_of t, Thm.term_of u) = LESS
 in
 (* FIXME: Replace tryfind by get_first !! *)
 fun real_nonlinear_prover proof_method ctxt =
@@ -881,8 +881,8 @@
 
 local
   open Conv
-  fun simple_cterm_ord t u = Term_Ord.fast_term_ord (term_of t, term_of u) = LESS
-  val concl = Thm.dest_arg o cprop_of
+  fun simple_cterm_ord t u = Term_Ord.fast_term_ord (Thm.term_of t, Thm.term_of u) = LESS
+  val concl = Thm.dest_arg o Thm.cprop_of
   val shuffle1 =
     fconv_rule (rewr_conv @{lemma "(a + x == y) == (x == y - (a::real))"
       by (atomize (full)) (simp add: field_simps)})
@@ -890,7 +890,7 @@
     fconv_rule (rewr_conv @{lemma "(x + a == y) ==  (x == y - (a::real))"
       by (atomize (full)) (simp add: field_simps)})
   fun substitutable_monomial fvs tm =
-    (case term_of tm of
+    (case Thm.term_of tm of
       Free (_, @{typ real}) =>
         if not (member (op aconvc) fvs tm) then (Rat.one, tm)
         else raise Failure "substitutable_monomial"
@@ -907,11 +907,11 @@
 
   fun isolate_variable v th =
     let
-      val w = Thm.dest_arg1 (cprop_of th)
+      val w = Thm.dest_arg1 (Thm.cprop_of th)
     in
       if v aconvc w then th
       else
-        (case term_of w of
+        (case Thm.term_of w of
           @{term "op + :: real => _"} $ _ $ _ =>
             if Thm.dest_arg1 w aconvc v then shuffle2 th
             else isolate_variable v (shuffle1 th)
@@ -951,7 +951,7 @@
             in
               substfirst
                 (filter_out
-                  (fn t => (Thm.dest_arg1 o Thm.dest_arg o cprop_of) t aconvc @{cterm "0::real"})
+                  (fn t => (Thm.dest_arg1 o Thm.dest_arg o Thm.cprop_of) t aconvc @{cterm "0::real"})
                   (map modify eqs),
                   map modify les,
                   map modify lts)
@@ -986,7 +986,7 @@
 
 fun check_sos kcts ct =
   let
-    val t = term_of ct
+    val t = Thm.term_of ct
     val _ =
       if not (null (Term.add_tfrees t []) andalso null (Term.add_tvars t []))
       then error "SOS: not sos. Additional type varables"
@@ -1022,10 +1022,10 @@
 
 
 local
-  val is_numeral = can (HOLogic.dest_number o term_of)
+  val is_numeral = can (HOLogic.dest_number o Thm.term_of)
 in
   fun get_denom b ct =
-    (case term_of ct of
+    (case Thm.term_of ct of
       @{term "op / :: real => _"} $ _ $ _ =>
         if is_numeral (Thm.dest_arg ct)
         then get_denom b (Thm.dest_arg1 ct)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Library/positivstellensatz.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Library/positivstellensatz.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Library/positivstellensatz.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -64,7 +64,7 @@
 structure Symfunc = FuncFun(type key = string val ord = fast_string_ord);
 structure Termfunc = FuncFun(type key = term val ord = Term_Ord.fast_term_ord);
 
-val cterm_ord = Term_Ord.fast_term_ord o apply2 term_of
+val cterm_ord = Term_Ord.fast_term_ord o apply2 Thm.term_of
 
 structure Ctermfunc = FuncFun(type key = cterm val ord = cterm_ord);
 
@@ -170,11 +170,11 @@
 
     (* Some useful derived rules *)
 fun deduct_antisym_rule tha thb =
-    Thm.equal_intr (Thm.implies_intr (cprop_of thb) tha)
-     (Thm.implies_intr (cprop_of tha) thb);
+    Thm.equal_intr (Thm.implies_intr (Thm.cprop_of thb) tha)
+     (Thm.implies_intr (Thm.cprop_of tha) thb);
 
 fun prove_hyp tha thb =
-  if exists (curry op aconv (concl_of tha)) (Thm.hyps_of thb)  (* FIXME !? *)
+  if exists (curry op aconv (Thm.concl_of tha)) (Thm.hyps_of thb)  (* FIXME !? *)
   then Thm.equal_elim (Thm.symmetric (deduct_antisym_rule tha thb)) tha else thb;
 
 val pth = @{lemma "(((x::real) < y) == (y - x > 0))" and "((x <= y) == (y - x >= 0))" and
@@ -279,10 +279,10 @@
 fun literals_conv bops uops cv =
   let
     fun h t =
-      case (term_of t) of
+      (case Thm.term_of t of
         b$_$_ => if member (op aconv) bops b then binop_conv h t else cv t
       | u$_ => if member (op aconv) uops u then arg_conv h t else cv t
-      | _ => cv t
+      | _ => cv t)
   in h end;
 
 fun cterm_of_rat x =
@@ -296,9 +296,9 @@
   end;
 
 fun dest_ratconst t =
-  case term_of t of
+  case Thm.term_of t of
     Const(@{const_name divide}, _)$a$b => Rat.rat_of_quotient(HOLogic.dest_number a |> snd, HOLogic.dest_number b |> snd)
-  | _ => Rat.rat_of_int (HOLogic.dest_number (term_of t) |> snd)
+  | _ => Rat.rat_of_int (HOLogic.dest_number (Thm.term_of t) |> snd)
 fun is_ratconst t = can dest_ratconst t
 
 (*
@@ -311,14 +311,14 @@
 
 fun find_cterm p t =
   if p t then t else
-  case term_of t of
+  case Thm.term_of t of
     _$_ => (find_cterm p (Thm.dest_fun t) handle CTERM _ => find_cterm p (Thm.dest_arg t))
   | Abs (_,_,_) => find_cterm p (Thm.dest_abs NONE t |> snd)
   | _ => raise CTERM ("find_cterm",[t]);
 
     (* Some conversions-related stuff which has been forbidden entrance into Pure/conv.ML*)
 fun instantiate_cterm' ty tms = Drule.cterm_rule (Drule.instantiate' ty tms)
-fun is_comb t = case (term_of t) of _$_ => true | _ => false;
+fun is_comb t = (case Thm.term_of t of _ $ _ => true | _ => false);
 
 fun is_binop ct ct' = ct aconvc (Thm.dest_fun (Thm.dest_fun ct'))
   handle CTERM _ => false;
@@ -428,7 +428,7 @@
         nnf_conv ctxt then_conv skolemize_conv then_conv prenex_conv then_conv
         weak_dnf_conv
 
-    val concl = Thm.dest_arg o cprop_of
+    val concl = Thm.dest_arg o Thm.cprop_of
     fun is_binop opr ct = (Thm.dest_fun2 ct aconvc opr handle CTERM _ => false)
     val is_req = is_binop @{cterm "op =:: real => _"}
     val is_ge = is_binop @{cterm "op <=:: real => _"}
@@ -501,36 +501,36 @@
     val strip_exists =
       let
         fun h (acc, t) =
-          case (term_of t) of
+          case Thm.term_of t of
             Const(@{const_name Ex},_)$Abs(_,_,_) =>
               h (Thm.dest_abs NONE (Thm.dest_arg t) |>> (fn v => v::acc))
           | _ => (acc,t)
       in fn t => h ([],t)
       end
     fun name_of x =
-      case term_of x of
+      case Thm.term_of x of
         Free(s,_) => s
       | Var ((s,_),_) => s
       | _ => "x"
 
     fun mk_forall x th =
       Drule.arg_cong_rule
-        (instantiate_cterm' [SOME (ctyp_of_term x)] [] @{cpat "All :: (?'a => bool) => _" })
+        (instantiate_cterm' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of_term x)] [] @{cpat "All :: (?'a => bool) => _" })
         (Thm.abstract_rule (name_of x) x th)
 
     val specl = fold_rev (fn x => fn th => instantiate' [] [SOME x] (th RS spec));
 
     fun ext T = Drule.cterm_rule (instantiate' [SOME T] []) @{cpat Ex}
-    fun mk_ex v t = Thm.apply (ext (ctyp_of_term v)) (Thm.lambda v t)
+    fun mk_ex v t = Thm.apply (ext (Thm.ctyp_of_term v)) (Thm.lambda v t)
 
     fun choose v th th' =
-      case concl_of th of
+      case Thm.concl_of th of
         @{term Trueprop} $ (Const(@{const_name Ex},_)$_) =>
         let
-          val p = (funpow 2 Thm.dest_arg o cprop_of) th
-          val T = (hd o Thm.dest_ctyp o ctyp_of_term) p
+          val p = (funpow 2 Thm.dest_arg o Thm.cprop_of) th
+          val T = (hd o Thm.dest_ctyp o Thm.ctyp_of_term) p
           val th0 = fconv_rule (Thm.beta_conversion true)
-            (instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME p, (SOME o Thm.dest_arg o cprop_of) th'] exE)
+            (instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME p, (SOME o Thm.dest_arg o Thm.cprop_of) th'] exE)
           val pv = (Thm.rhs_of o Thm.beta_conversion true)
             (Thm.apply @{cterm Trueprop} (Thm.apply p v))
           val th1 = Thm.forall_intr v (Thm.implies_intr pv th')
@@ -545,7 +545,7 @@
     val strip_forall =
       let
         fun h (acc, t) =
-          case (term_of t) of
+          case Thm.term_of t of
             Const(@{const_name All},_)$Abs(_,_,_) =>
               h (Thm.dest_abs NONE (Thm.dest_arg t) |>> (fn v => v::acc))
           | _ => (acc,t)
@@ -693,15 +693,15 @@
       end
 
   fun is_alien ct =
-      case term_of ct of
-        Const(@{const_name "real"}, _)$ n =>
-        if can HOLogic.dest_number n then false else true
-      | _ => false
+    case Thm.term_of ct of
+      Const(@{const_name "real"}, _)$ n =>
+      if can HOLogic.dest_number n then false else true
+    | _ => false
 in
 fun real_linear_prover translator (eq,le,lt) =
   let
-    val lhs = lin_of_hol o Thm.dest_arg1 o Thm.dest_arg o cprop_of
-    val rhs = lin_of_hol o Thm.dest_arg o Thm.dest_arg o cprop_of
+    val lhs = lin_of_hol o Thm.dest_arg1 o Thm.dest_arg o Thm.cprop_of
+    val rhs = lin_of_hol o Thm.dest_arg o Thm.dest_arg o Thm.cprop_of
     val eq_pols = map lhs eq
     val le_pols = map rhs le
     val lt_pols = map rhs lt
@@ -770,7 +770,7 @@
 
 fun gen_prover_real_arith ctxt prover =
   let
-    fun simple_cterm_ord t u = Term_Ord.term_ord (term_of t, term_of u) = LESS
+    fun simple_cterm_ord t u = Term_Ord.term_ord (Thm.term_of t, Thm.term_of u) = LESS
     val {add, mul, neg, pow = _, sub = _, main} =
         Semiring_Normalizer.semiring_normalizers_ord_wrapper ctxt
         (the (Semiring_Normalizer.match ctxt @{cterm "(0::real) + 1"}))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Library/refute.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Library/refute.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Library/refute.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -1202,13 +1202,13 @@
 
 fun refute_goal ctxt params th i =
   let
-    val t = th |> prop_of
+    val t = th |> Thm.prop_of
   in
     if Logic.count_prems t = 0 then
       (writeln "No subgoal!"; "none")
     else
       let
-        val assms = map term_of (Assumption.all_assms_of ctxt)
+        val assms = map Thm.term_of (Assumption.all_assms_of ctxt)
         val (t, frees) = Logic.goal_params t i
       in
         refute_term ctxt params assms (subst_bounds (frees, t))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Library/simps_case_conv.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Library/simps_case_conv.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Library/simps_case_conv.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
     #> map_filter (Ctr_Sugar.ctr_sugar_of ctxt)
     #> map #split
 
-val strip_eq = prop_of #> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop #> HOLogic.dest_eq
+val strip_eq = Thm.prop_of #> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop #> HOLogic.dest_eq
 
 
 local
@@ -161,7 +161,7 @@
 
 fun apply_split ctxt split thm = Seq.of_list
   let val ((_,thm'), ctxt') = Variable.import false [thm] ctxt in
-    (Variable.export ctxt' ctxt) (filter (was_split o prop_of) (thm' RL [split]))
+    (Variable.export ctxt' ctxt) (filter (was_split o Thm.prop_of) (thm' RL [split]))
   end
 
 fun forward_tac rules t = Seq.of_list ([t] RL rules)
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
 fun do_split ctxt split =
   let
     val split' = split RS iffD1;
-    val split_rhs = concl_of (hd (snd (fst (Variable.import false [split'] ctxt))))
+    val split_rhs = Thm.concl_of (hd (snd (fst (Variable.import false [split'] ctxt))))
   in if was_split split_rhs
      then DETERM (apply_split ctxt split') THEN get_rules_once_split
      else raise TERM ("malformed split rule", [split_rhs])
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/List.thy
--- a/src/HOL/List.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/List.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -708,7 +708,7 @@
                 val inner_t =
                   fold (fn (_, T) => fn t => HOLogic.exists_const T $ absdummy T t)
                     (rev bound_vs) (fold (curry HOLogic.mk_conj) eqs' pat_eq')
-                val lhs = term_of redex
+                val lhs = Thm.term_of redex
                 val rhs = HOLogic.mk_Collect ("x", rT, inner_t)
                 val rewrite_rule_t = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (HOLogic.mk_eq (lhs, rhs))
               in
@@ -717,7 +717,7 @@
                     (fn {context, ...} => tac context (rev Tis))) RS @{thm eq_reflection})
               end))
   in
-    make_inner_eqs [] [] [] (dest_set (term_of redex))
+    make_inner_eqs [] [] [] (dest_set (Thm.term_of redex))
   end
 
 end
@@ -1043,7 +1043,7 @@
         else if lastl aconv lastr then rearr @{thm append_same_eq}
         else NONE
       end;
-  in fn _ => fn ctxt => fn ct => list_eq ctxt (term_of ct) end;
+  in fn _ => fn ctxt => fn ct => list_eq ctxt (Thm.term_of ct) end;
 *}
 
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Matrix_LP/ComputeHOL.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Matrix_LP/ComputeHOL.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Matrix_LP/ComputeHOL.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
 struct
 
 local
-fun lhs_of eq = fst (Thm.dest_equals (cprop_of eq));
+fun lhs_of eq = fst (Thm.dest_equals (Thm.cprop_of eq));
 in
 fun rewrite_conv [] ct = raise CTERM ("rewrite_conv", [ct])
   | rewrite_conv (eq :: eqs) ct =
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Matrix_LP/Compute_Oracle/compute.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Matrix_LP/Compute_Oracle/compute.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Matrix_LP/Compute_Oracle/compute.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@
 fun export_thm thy hyps shyps prop =
     let
         val th = export_oracle (thy, hyps, shyps, prop)
-        val hyps = map (fn h => Thm.assume (cterm_of thy h)) hyps
+        val hyps = map (fn h => Thm.assume (Thm.cterm_of thy h)) hyps
     in
         fold (fn h => fn p => Thm.implies_elim p h) hyps th 
     end
@@ -378,7 +378,7 @@
 fun rewrite computer ct =
     let
         val thy = Thm.theory_of_cterm ct
-        val {t=t',T=ty,...} = rep_cterm ct
+        val {t=t',T=ty,...} = Thm.rep_cterm ct
         val _ = super_theory (theory_of computer) thy
         val naming = naming_of computer
         val (encoding, t) = remove_types (encoding_of computer) t'
@@ -401,7 +401,7 @@
 
 fun make_theorem computer th vars =
 let
-    val _ = super_theory (theory_of computer) (theory_of_thm th)
+    val _ = super_theory (theory_of computer) (Thm.theory_of_thm th)
 
     val (ComputeThm (hyps, shyps, prop)) = thm2cthm th 
 
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@
     val (encoding, concl) = remove_types encoding (Logic.strip_imp_concl prop)
     val _ = set_encoding computer encoding
 in
-    Theorem (theory_of_thm th, stamp_of computer, vartab, varsubst, 
+    Theorem (Thm.theory_of_thm th, stamp_of computer, vartab, varsubst, 
              prems, concl, hyps, shyps)
 end
     
@@ -506,8 +506,8 @@
 
     fun compute_inst (s, ct) vs =
         let
-            val _ = super_theory (theory_of_cterm ct) thy
-            val ty = typ_of (ctyp_of_term ct) 
+            val _ = super_theory (Thm.theory_of_cterm ct) thy
+            val ty = Thm.typ_of (Thm.ctyp_of_term ct) 
         in          
             (case Symtab.lookup vartab s of 
                  NONE => raise Compute ("instantiate: variable '"^s^"' not found in theorem")
@@ -519,7 +519,7 @@
                           raise Compute ("instantiate: wrong type for variable '"^s^"'")
                       else
                           let
-                              val t = rewrite computer (term_of ct)
+                              val t = rewrite computer (Thm.term_of ct)
                               val _ = assert_varfree vs t 
                               val _ = assert_closed t
                           in
@@ -611,7 +611,7 @@
     val thy = 
         let
             val thy1 = theory_of_theorem th
-            val thy2 = theory_of_thm th'
+            val thy2 = Thm.theory_of_thm th'
         in
             if Theory.subthy (thy1, thy2) then thy2 
             else if Theory.subthy (thy2, thy1) then thy1 else
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Matrix_LP/Compute_Oracle/linker.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Matrix_LP/Compute_Oracle/linker.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Matrix_LP/Compute_Oracle/linker.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -246,7 +246,7 @@
 
 fun collect_consts_of_thm th = 
     let
-        val th = prop_of th
+        val th = Thm.prop_of th
         val (prems, th) = (Logic.strip_imp_prems th, Logic.strip_imp_concl th)
         val (left, right) = Logic.dest_equals th
     in
@@ -315,7 +315,8 @@
     end
 
 fun conv_subst thy (subst : Type.tyenv) =
-    map (fn (iname, (sort, ty)) => (ctyp_of thy (TVar (iname, sort)), ctyp_of thy ty)) (Vartab.dest subst)
+    map (fn (iname, (sort, ty)) => (Thm.ctyp_of thy (TVar (iname, sort)), Thm.ctyp_of thy ty))
+      (Vartab.dest subst)
 
 fun add_monos thy monocs pats ths =
     let
@@ -433,7 +434,7 @@
 
 fun rewrite pc cts =
     let
-        val _ = add_instances' pc (map term_of cts)
+        val _ = add_instances' pc (map Thm.term_of cts)
         val computer = (computer_of pc)
     in
         map (fn ct => Compute.rewrite computer ct) cts
@@ -443,7 +444,7 @@
 
 fun make_theorem pc th vars = 
     let
-        val _ = add_instances' pc [prop_of th]
+        val _ = add_instances' pc [Thm.prop_of th]
 
     in
         Compute.make_theorem (computer_of pc) th vars
@@ -451,7 +452,7 @@
 
 fun instantiate pc insts th = 
     let
-        val _ = add_instances' pc (map (term_of o snd) insts)
+        val _ = add_instances' pc (map (Thm.term_of o snd) insts)
     in
         Compute.instantiate (computer_of pc) insts th
     end
@@ -460,7 +461,7 @@
 
 fun modus_ponens pc prem_no th' th =
     let
-        val _ = add_instances' pc [prop_of th']
+        val _ = add_instances' pc [Thm.prop_of th']
     in
         Compute.modus_ponens (computer_of pc) prem_no th' th
     end    
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Matrix_LP/matrixlp.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Matrix_LP/matrixlp.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Matrix_LP/matrixlp.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -23,7 +23,7 @@
 
 fun matrix_simplify th =
   let
-    val simp_th = matrix_compute (cprop_of th)
+    val simp_th = matrix_compute (Thm.cprop_of th)
     val th = Thm.strip_shyps (Thm.equal_elim simp_th th)
     fun removeTrue th = removeTrue (Thm.implies_elim th TrueI) handle THM _ => th
   in
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Mirabelle/Tools/mirabelle_sledgehammer.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Mirabelle/Tools/mirabelle_sledgehammer.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Mirabelle/Tools/mirabelle_sledgehammer.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -310,7 +310,7 @@
 
 fun get_prover ctxt name params goal all_facts =
   let
-    val learn = Sledgehammer_MaSh.mash_learn_proof ctxt params (prop_of goal) all_facts
+    val learn = Sledgehammer_MaSh.mash_learn_proof ctxt params (Thm.prop_of goal) all_facts
   in
     Sledgehammer_Prover_Minimize.get_minimizing_prover ctxt Sledgehammer_Prover.Normal learn name
   end
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Multivariate_Analysis/normarith.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Multivariate_Analysis/normarith.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Multivariate_Analysis/normarith.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -15,15 +15,15 @@
 
  open Conv;
  val bool_eq = op = : bool *bool -> bool
-  fun dest_ratconst t = case term_of t of
+  fun dest_ratconst t = case Thm.term_of t of
    Const(@{const_name divide}, _)$a$b => Rat.rat_of_quotient(HOLogic.dest_number a |> snd, HOLogic.dest_number b |> snd)
  | Const(@{const_name inverse}, _)$a => Rat.rat_of_quotient(1, HOLogic.dest_number a |> snd)
- | _ => Rat.rat_of_int (HOLogic.dest_number (term_of t) |> snd)
+ | _ => Rat.rat_of_int (HOLogic.dest_number (Thm.term_of t) |> snd)
  fun is_ratconst t = can dest_ratconst t
- fun augment_norm b t acc = case term_of t of
+ fun augment_norm b t acc = case Thm.term_of t of
      Const(@{const_name norm}, _) $ _ => insert (eq_pair bool_eq (op aconvc)) (b,Thm.dest_arg t) acc
    | _ => acc
- fun find_normedterms t acc = case term_of t of
+ fun find_normedterms t acc = case Thm.term_of t of
     @{term "op + :: real => _"}$_$_ =>
             find_normedterms (Thm.dest_arg1 t) (find_normedterms (Thm.dest_arg t) acc)
       | @{term "op * :: real => _"}$_$_ =>
@@ -50,7 +50,7 @@
  fun int_lincomb_eq l r = FuncUtil.Intfunc.is_empty (int_lincomb_sub l r)
 *)
 
-fun vector_lincomb t = case term_of t of
+fun vector_lincomb t = case Thm.term_of t of
    Const(@{const_name plus}, _) $ _ $ _ =>
     cterm_lincomb_add (vector_lincomb (Thm.dest_arg1 t)) (vector_lincomb (Thm.dest_arg t))
  | Const(@{const_name minus}, _) $ _ $ _ =>
@@ -81,7 +81,7 @@
        end
    | SOME _ => fns) ts []
 
-fun replacenegnorms cv t = case term_of t of
+fun replacenegnorms cv t = case Thm.term_of t of
   @{term "op + :: real => _"}$_$_ => binop_conv (replacenegnorms cv) t
 | @{term "op * :: real => _"}$_$_ =>
     if dest_ratconst (Thm.dest_arg1 t) </ Rat.zero then arg_conv cv t else Thm.reflexive t
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@
  handle CTERM _ =>
   (apply_pth8 ctxt ct
    handle CTERM _ =>
-    (case term_of ct of
+    (case Thm.term_of ct of
      Const(@{const_name plus},_)$lt$rt =>
       let
        val l = headvector lt
@@ -219,7 +219,7 @@
       end
      | _ => Thm.reflexive ct))
 
-fun vector_canon_conv ctxt ct = case term_of ct of
+fun vector_canon_conv ctxt ct = case Thm.term_of ct of
  Const(@{const_name plus},_)$_$_ =>
   let
    val ((p,l),r) = Thm.dest_comb ct |>> Thm.dest_comb
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@
 *)
 | _ => apply_pth1 ct
 
-fun norm_canon_conv ctxt ct = case term_of ct of
+fun norm_canon_conv ctxt ct = case Thm.term_of ct of
   Const(@{const_name norm},_)$_ => arg_conv (vector_canon_conv ctxt) ct
  | _ => raise CTERM ("norm_canon_conv", [ct])
 
@@ -258,9 +258,9 @@
 
 local
  val pth_zero = @{thm norm_zero}
- val tv_n = (ctyp_of_term o Thm.dest_arg o Thm.dest_arg1 o Thm.dest_arg o cprop_of)
+ val tv_n = (Thm.ctyp_of_term o Thm.dest_arg o Thm.dest_arg1 o Thm.dest_arg o Thm.cprop_of)
              pth_zero
- val concl = Thm.dest_arg o cprop_of
+ val concl = Thm.dest_arg o Thm.cprop_of
  fun real_vector_combo_prover ctxt translator (nubs,ges,gts) =
   let
    (* FIXME: Should be computed statically!!*)
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@
         (fn t => null (FuncUtil.Ctermfunc.dom (vector_lincomb t))) (map snd rawdests)
 
   in fst (RealArith.real_linear_prover translator
-        (map (fn t => Drule.instantiate_normalize ([(tv_n, ctyp_of_term t)],[]) pth_zero)
+        (map (fn t => Drule.instantiate_normalize ([(tv_n, Thm.ctyp_of_term t)],[]) pth_zero)
             zerodests,
         map (fconv_rule (try_conv (Conv.top_sweep_conv (K (norm_canon_conv ctxt)) ctxt) then_conv
                        arg_conv (arg_conv real_poly_conv))) ges',
@@ -332,7 +332,7 @@
 local
  val pth = @{thm norm_imp_pos_and_ge}
  val norm_mp = match_mp pth
- val concl = Thm.dest_arg o cprop_of
+ val concl = Thm.dest_arg o Thm.cprop_of
  fun conjunct1 th = th RS @{thm conjunct1}
  fun conjunct2 th = th RS @{thm conjunct2}
 fun real_vector_ineq_prover ctxt translator (ges,gts) =
@@ -342,8 +342,8 @@
   val lctab = vector_lincombs (map snd (filter (not o fst) ntms))
   val (fxns, ctxt') = Variable.variant_fixes (replicate (length lctab) "x") ctxt
   fun instantiate_cterm' ty tms = Drule.cterm_rule (Drule.instantiate' ty tms)
-  fun mk_norm t = Thm.apply (instantiate_cterm' [SOME (ctyp_of_term t)] [] @{cpat "norm :: (?'a :: real_normed_vector) => real"}) t
-  fun mk_equals l r = Thm.apply (Thm.apply (instantiate_cterm' [SOME (ctyp_of_term l)] [] @{cpat "op == :: ?'a =>_"}) l) r
+  fun mk_norm t = Thm.apply (instantiate_cterm' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of_term t)] [] @{cpat "norm :: (?'a :: real_normed_vector) => real"}) t
+  fun mk_equals l r = Thm.apply (Thm.apply (instantiate_cterm' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of_term l)] [] @{cpat "op == :: ?'a =>_"}) l) r
   val asl = map2 (fn (t,_) => fn n => Thm.assume (mk_equals (mk_norm t) (Proof_Context.cterm_of ctxt' (Free(n,@{typ real}))))) lctab fxns
   val replace_conv = try_conv (rewrs_conv asl)
   val replace_rule = fconv_rule (funpow 2 arg_conv (replacenegnorms replace_conv))
@@ -353,7 +353,7 @@
   val gts' = map replace_rule gts
   val nubs = map (conjunct2 o norm_mp) asl
   val th1 = real_vector_combo_prover ctxt' translator (nubs,ges',gts')
-  val shs = filter (member (fn (t,th) => t aconvc cprop_of th) asl) (#hyps (crep_thm th1))
+  val shs = filter (member (fn (t,th) => t aconvc Thm.cprop_of th) asl) (#hyps (Thm.crep_thm th1))
   val th11 = hd (Variable.export ctxt' ctxt [fold Thm.implies_intr shs th1])
   val cps = map (swap o Thm.dest_equals) (cprems_of th11)
   val th12 = Drule.instantiate_normalize ([], cps) th11
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@
 local
  val rawrule = fconv_rule (arg_conv (rewr_conv @{thm real_eq_0_iff_le_ge_0}))
  fun conj_pair th = (th RS @{thm conjunct1}, th RS @{thm conjunct2})
- fun simple_cterm_ord t u = Term_Ord.term_ord (term_of t, term_of u) = LESS;
+ fun simple_cterm_ord t u = Term_Ord.term_ord (Thm.term_of t, Thm.term_of u) = LESS;
   (* FIXME: Lookup in the context every time!!! Fix this !!!*)
  fun splitequation ctxt th acc =
   let
@@ -391,7 +391,7 @@
  fun pure ctxt = fst o RealArith.gen_prover_real_arith ctxt (real_vector_prover ctxt);
  fun norm_arith ctxt ct =
   let
-   val ctxt' = Variable.declare_term (term_of ct) ctxt
+   val ctxt' = Variable.declare_term (Thm.term_of ct) ctxt
    val th = init_conv ctxt' ct
   in Thm.equal_elim (Drule.arg_cong_rule @{cterm Trueprop} (Thm.symmetric th))
                 (pure ctxt' (Thm.rhs_of th))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Mutabelle/mutabelle_extra.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Mutabelle/mutabelle_extra.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Mutabelle/mutabelle_extra.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -236,7 +236,7 @@
 val forbidden_consts = [@{const_name Pure.type}]
 
 fun is_forbidden_theorem (s, th) =
-  let val consts = Term.add_const_names (prop_of th) [] in
+  let val consts = Term.add_const_names (Thm.prop_of th) [] in
     exists (member (op =) (Long_Name.explode s)) forbidden_thms orelse
     exists (member (op =) forbidden_consts) consts orelse
     length (Long_Name.explode s) <> 2 orelse
@@ -325,7 +325,7 @@
         (fst (Variable.import_terms true [t] ctxt)))
   end
 
-fun is_executable_thm thy th = is_executable_term thy (prop_of th)
+fun is_executable_thm thy th = is_executable_term thy (Thm.prop_of th)
 
 val freezeT =
   map_types (map_type_tvar (fn ((a, i), S) =>
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@
 
 fun thms_of all thy =
   filter
-    (fn th => (all orelse Context.theory_name (theory_of_thm th) = Context.theory_name thy)
+    (fn th => (all orelse Context.theory_name (Thm.theory_of_thm th) = Context.theory_name thy)
       (* andalso is_executable_thm thy th *))
     (map snd (filter_out is_forbidden_theorem (Global_Theory.all_thms_of thy false)))
 
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@
       map (fn (mtd_name, invoke_mtd) =>
         (mtd_name, safe_invoke_mtd thy (mtd_name, invoke_mtd) mutant)) mtds)
   in
-    (Thm.get_name_hint thm, exec, prop_of thm, map create_mutant_subentry mutants)
+    (Thm.get_name_hint thm, exec, Thm.prop_of thm, map create_mutant_subentry mutants)
   end
 
 (* (theory -> thm -> bool -> term list -> mtd list -> 'a) -> theory -> mtd list -> thm -> 'a *)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/NSA/HyperDef.thy
--- a/src/HOL/NSA/HyperDef.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/NSA/HyperDef.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -338,7 +338,7 @@
 *}
 
 simproc_setup fast_arith_hypreal ("(m::hypreal) < n" | "(m::hypreal) <= n" | "(m::hypreal) = n") =
-  {* fn _ => fn ss => fn ct => Lin_Arith.simproc ss (term_of ct) *}
+  {* fn _ => fn ss => fn ct => Lin_Arith.simproc ss (Thm.term_of ct) *}
 
 
 subsection {* Exponentials on the Hyperreals *}
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/NSA/NSA.thy
--- a/src/HOL/NSA/NSA.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/NSA/NSA.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -656,7 +656,8 @@
   ("0 @= x" | "1 @= y" | "numeral w @= z" | "- 1 @= y" | "- numeral w @= r") =
 {*
   let val rule = @{thm approx_reorient} RS eq_reflection
-      fun proc phi ss ct = case term_of ct of
+      fun proc phi ss ct =
+        case Thm.term_of ct of
           _ $ t $ u => if can HOLogic.dest_number u then NONE
             else if can HOLogic.dest_number t then SOME rule else NONE
         | _ => NONE
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/NSA/transfer.ML
--- a/src/HOL/NSA/transfer.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/NSA/transfer.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -57,7 +57,7 @@
     val meta = Local_Defs.meta_rewrite_rule ctxt;
     val ths' = map meta ths;
     val unfolds' = map meta unfolds and refolds' = map meta refolds;
-    val (_$_$t') = concl_of (Raw_Simplifier.rewrite ctxt true unfolds' (cterm_of thy t))
+    val (_$_$t') = Thm.concl_of (Raw_Simplifier.rewrite ctxt true unfolds' (Thm.cterm_of thy t))
     val u = unstar_term consts t'
     val tac =
       rewrite_goals_tac ctxt (ths' @ refolds' @ unfolds') THEN
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
         (fn th =>
             let
               val tr = transfer_thm_of ctxt ths t
-              val (_$l$r) = concl_of tr;
+              val (_$l$r) = Thm.concl_of tr;
               val trs = if l aconv r then [] else [tr];
             in rewrite_goals_tac ctxt trs th end))
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Nat.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Nat.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Nat.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -1629,7 +1629,7 @@
 declaration {* K Lin_Arith.setup *}
 
 simproc_setup fast_arith_nat ("(m::nat) < n" | "(m::nat) <= n" | "(m::nat) = n") =
-  {* fn _ => fn ss => fn ct => Lin_Arith.simproc ss (term_of ct) *}
+  {* fn _ => fn ss => fn ct => Lin_Arith.simproc ss (Thm.term_of ct) *}
 (* Because of this simproc, the arithmetic solver is really only
 useful to detect inconsistencies among the premises for subgoals which are
 *not* themselves (in)equalities, because the latter activate
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Nitpick_Examples/Mono_Nits.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Nitpick_Examples/Mono_Nits.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Nitpick_Examples/Mono_Nits.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -153,7 +153,7 @@
 fun theorems_of thy =
   filter (fn (name, th) =>
              not (is_forbidden_theorem name) andalso
-             (theory_of_thm th, thy) |> apply2 Context.theory_name |> op =)
+             (Thm.theory_of_thm th, thy) |> apply2 Context.theory_name |> op =)
          (Global_Theory.all_thms_of thy true)
 
 fun check_formulas tsp =
@@ -179,7 +179,7 @@
     val _ = File.write path ""
     fun check_theorem (name, th) =
       let
-        val t = th |> prop_of |> Type.legacy_freeze |> close_form
+        val t = th |> Thm.prop_of |> Type.legacy_freeze |> close_form
         val neg_t = Logic.mk_implies (t, @{prop False})
         val (nondef_ts, def_ts, _, _, _, _) =
           TimeLimit.timeLimit preproc_timeout (preprocess_formulas hol_ctxt [])
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_datatype.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_datatype.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_datatype.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -84,7 +84,7 @@
 
 (*******************************)
 
-val (_ $ (_ $ (_ $ (distinct_f $ _) $ _))) = hd (prems_of Old_Datatype.distinct_lemma);
+val (_ $ (_ $ (_ $ (distinct_f $ _) $ _))) = hd (Thm.prems_of Old_Datatype.distinct_lemma);
 
 
 (** simplification procedure for sorting permutations **)
@@ -108,9 +108,9 @@
             val cp = cp_inst_of thy a b;
             val dj = dj_thm_of thy b a;
             val dj_cp' = [cp, dj] MRS dj_cp;
-            val cert = SOME o cterm_of thy
+            val cert = SOME o Thm.cterm_of thy
           in
-            SOME (mk_meta_eq (Drule.instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of thy S)]
+            SOME (mk_meta_eq (Drule.instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of thy S)]
               [cert t, cert r, cert s] dj_cp'))
           end
         else NONE
@@ -152,9 +152,11 @@
     HOLogic.mk_prod (x, y) $ Const (@{const_name Nil}, pT)
   end;
 
-fun mk_not_sym ths = maps (fn th => case prop_of th of
-    _ $ (Const (@{const_name Not}, _) $ (Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ _ $ _)) => [th, th RS not_sym]
-  | _ => [th]) ths;
+fun mk_not_sym ths = maps (fn th =>
+  (case Thm.prop_of th of
+    _ $ (Const (@{const_name Not}, _) $ (Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ _ $ _)) =>
+    [th, th RS not_sym]
+  | _ => [th])) ths;
 
 fun fresh_const T U = Const (@{const_name Nominal.fresh}, T --> U --> HOLogic.boolT);
 fun fresh_star_const T U =
@@ -775,11 +777,12 @@
     fun dt_constr_defs ((((((_, (_, _, constrs)),
         (_, (_, _, constrs'))), tname), T), T'), constr_syntax) (thy, defs, eqns, dist_lemmas) =
       let
-        val rep_const = cterm_of thy
+        val rep_const = Thm.cterm_of thy
           (Const (Sign.intern_const thy ("Rep_" ^ tname), T --> T'));
         val dist =
           Drule.export_without_context
-            (cterm_instantiate [(cterm_of thy distinct_f, rep_const)] Old_Datatype.distinct_lemma);
+            (cterm_instantiate
+              [(Thm.cterm_of thy distinct_f, rep_const)] Old_Datatype.distinct_lemma);
         val (thy', defs', eqns') = fold (make_constr_def tname T T')
           (constrs ~~ constrs' ~~ constr_syntax) (Sign.add_path tname thy, defs, [])
       in
@@ -815,7 +818,7 @@
 
     fun prove_perm_rep_perm (atom, perm_closed_thms) = map (fn th =>
       let
-        val _ $ (_ $ (Rep $ x)) = Logic.unvarify_global (prop_of th);
+        val _ $ (_ $ (Rep $ x)) = Logic.unvarify_global (Thm.prop_of th);
         val Type ("fun", [T, U]) = fastype_of Rep;
         val permT = mk_permT (Type (atom, []));
         val pi = Free ("pi", permT);
@@ -1044,11 +1047,11 @@
                full_simp_tac (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt addsimps Rep_inverse_thms) 1,
                etac mp 1, resolve_tac ctxt Rep_thms 1])]);
 
-    val Ps = map head_of (HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of indrule_lemma)));
+    val Ps = map head_of (HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of indrule_lemma)));
     val frees = if length Ps = 1 then [Free ("P", snd (dest_Var (hd Ps)))] else
       map (Free o apfst fst o dest_Var) Ps;
     val indrule_lemma' = cterm_instantiate
-      (map (cterm_of thy8) Ps ~~ map (cterm_of thy8) frees) indrule_lemma;
+      (map (Thm.cterm_of thy8) Ps ~~ map (Thm.cterm_of thy8) frees) indrule_lemma;
 
     val Abs_inverse_thms' = map (fn r => r RS subst) Abs_inverse_thms;
 
@@ -1254,17 +1257,18 @@
              full_simp_tac (put_simpset HOL_ss ctxt' addsimps (fresh_prod :: fresh_atm)) 1,
              REPEAT (etac conjE 1)])
           [ex] ctxt
-      in (freshs1 @ [term_of cx], freshs2 @ ths, ctxt') end;
+      in (freshs1 @ [Thm.term_of cx], freshs2 @ ths, ctxt') end;
 
     fun fresh_fresh_inst thy a b =
       let
         val T = fastype_of a;
-        val SOME th = find_first (fn th => case prop_of th of
+        val SOME th = find_first (fn th =>
+          (case Thm.prop_of th of
             _ $ (_ $ (Const (_, Type (_, [U, _])) $ _ $ _)) $ _ => U = T
-          | _ => false) perm_fresh_fresh
+          | _ => false)) perm_fresh_fresh
       in
         Drule.instantiate' []
-          [SOME (cterm_of thy a), NONE, SOME (cterm_of thy b)] th
+          [SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy a), NONE, SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy b)] th
       end;
 
     val fs_cp_sort =
@@ -1311,11 +1315,11 @@
                    SUBPROOF (fn {prems = iprems, params, concl,
                        context = context2, ...} =>
                      let
-                       val concl' = term_of concl;
+                       val concl' = Thm.term_of concl;
                        val _ $ (_ $ _ $ u) = concl';
                        val U = fastype_of u;
                        val (xs, params') =
-                         chop (length cargs) (map (term_of o #2) params);
+                         chop (length cargs) (map (Thm.term_of o #2) params);
                        val Ts = map fastype_of xs;
                        val cnstr = Const (cname, Ts ---> U);
                        val (pis, z) = split_last params';
@@ -1378,13 +1382,13 @@
 
     val induct_aux' = Thm.instantiate ([],
       map (fn (s, v as Var (_, T)) =>
-        (cterm_of thy9 v, cterm_of thy9 (Free (s, T))))
+        (Thm.cterm_of thy9 v, Thm.cterm_of thy9 (Free (s, T))))
           (pnames ~~ map head_of (HOLogic.dest_conj
-             (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of induct_aux)))) @
+             (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of induct_aux)))) @
       map (fn (_, f) =>
         let val f' = Logic.varify_global f
-        in (cterm_of thy9 f',
-          cterm_of thy9 (Const (@{const_name Nominal.supp}, fastype_of f')))
+        in (Thm.cterm_of thy9 f',
+          Thm.cterm_of thy9 (Const (@{const_name Nominal.supp}, fastype_of f')))
         end) fresh_fs) induct_aux;
 
     val induct = Goal.prove_global_future thy9 []
@@ -1547,8 +1551,8 @@
             (augment_sort thy1 pt_cp_sort
               (Logic.mk_implies (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop Q, HOLogic.mk_Trueprop P)))
             (fn {context = ctxt, ...} => dtac (Thm.instantiate ([],
-                 [(cterm_of thy11 (Var (("pi", 0), permT)),
-                   cterm_of thy11 (Const (@{const_name rev}, permT --> permT) $ pi))]) th) 1 THEN
+                 [(Thm.cterm_of thy11 (Var (("pi", 0), permT)),
+                   Thm.cterm_of thy11 (Const (@{const_name rev}, permT --> permT) $ pi))]) th) 1 THEN
                NominalPermeq.perm_simp_tac (put_simpset HOL_ss ctxt) 1)) (ps ~~ ths)
       in (ths, ths') end) dt_atomTs);
 
@@ -1622,12 +1626,12 @@
                      fresh_prems) = chop (length finite_prems) prems;
                    val unique_prem' = unique_prem RS spec RS mp;
                    val unique = [unique_prem', unique_prem' RS sym] MRS trans;
-                   val _ $ (_ $ (_ $ S $ _)) $ _ = prop_of supports_fresh;
+                   val _ $ (_ $ (_ $ S $ _)) $ _ = Thm.prop_of supports_fresh;
                    val tuple = foldr1 HOLogic.mk_prod (x :: rec_fns')
                  in EVERY
                    [rtac (Drule.cterm_instantiate
-                      [(cterm_of thy11 S,
-                        cterm_of thy11 (Const (@{const_name Nominal.supp},
+                      [(Thm.cterm_of thy11 S,
+                        Thm.cterm_of thy11 (Const (@{const_name Nominal.supp},
                           fastype_of tuple --> HOLogic.mk_setT aT) $ tuple))]
                       supports_fresh) 1,
                     simp_tac (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss context addsimps
@@ -1638,8 +1642,9 @@
                     SUBPROOF (fn {prems = prems', params = [(_, a), (_, b)], ...} => EVERY
                       [cut_facts_tac [rec_prem] 1,
                        rtac (Thm.instantiate ([],
-                         [(cterm_of thy11 (Var (("pi", 0), mk_permT aT)),
-                           cterm_of thy11 (perm_of_pair (term_of a, term_of b)))]) eqvt_th) 1,
+                         [(Thm.cterm_of thy11 (Var (("pi", 0), mk_permT aT)),
+                           Thm.cterm_of thy11
+                            (perm_of_pair (Thm.term_of a, Thm.term_of b)))]) eqvt_th) 1,
                        asm_simp_tac (put_simpset HOL_ss context addsimps
                          (prems' @ perm_swap @ perm_fresh_fresh)) 1]) context 1,
                     rtac rec_prem 1,
@@ -1666,7 +1671,7 @@
       (rec_unique_frees ~~ rec_result_Ts ~~ rec_sets);
 
     val induct_aux_rec = Drule.cterm_instantiate
-      (map (apply2 (cterm_of thy11) o apsnd (augment_sort thy11 fs_cp_sort))
+      (map (apply2 (Thm.cterm_of thy11) o apsnd (augment_sort thy11 fs_cp_sort))
          (map (fn (aT, f) => (Logic.varify_global f, Abs ("z", HOLogic.unitT,
             Const (@{const_name Nominal.supp}, fun_tupleT --> HOLogic.mk_setT aT) $ fun_tuple)))
               fresh_fs @
@@ -1694,7 +1699,7 @@
              full_simp_tac (put_simpset HOL_ss ctxt addsimps (fresh_prod :: fresh_atm)) 1,
              REPEAT (etac conjE 1)])
           [ex] ctxt
-      in (freshs1 @ [term_of cx], freshs2 @ ths, ctxt') end;
+      in (freshs1 @ [Thm.term_of cx], freshs2 @ ths, ctxt') end;
 
     val finite_ctxt_prems = map (fn aT =>
       HOLogic.mk_Trueprop
@@ -1747,9 +1752,9 @@
                 SUBPROOF (fn {asms, concl, prems = prems', params, context = context', ...} =>
                   let
                     val SOME prem = find_first (can (HOLogic.dest_eq o
-                      HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of)) prems';
-                    val _ $ (_ $ lhs $ rhs) = prop_of prem;
-                    val _ $ (_ $ lhs' $ rhs') = term_of concl;
+                      HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of)) prems';
+                    val _ $ (_ $ lhs $ rhs) = Thm.prop_of prem;
+                    val _ $ (_ $ lhs' $ rhs') = Thm.term_of concl;
                     val rT = fastype_of lhs';
                     val (c, cargsl) = strip_comb lhs;
                     val cargsl' = partition_cargs idxs cargsl;
@@ -1758,17 +1763,20 @@
                     val cargsr' = partition_cargs idxs cargsr;
                     val boundsr = maps fst cargsr';
                     val (params1, _ :: params2) =
-                      chop (length params div 2) (map (term_of o #2) params);
+                      chop (length params div 2) (map (Thm.term_of o #2) params);
                     val params' = params1 @ params2;
-                    val rec_prems = filter (fn th => case prop_of th of
-                        _ $ p => (case head_of p of
-                          Const (s, _) => member (op =) rec_set_names s
-                        | _ => false)
-                      | _ => false) prems';
-                    val fresh_prems = filter (fn th => case prop_of th of
+                    val rec_prems = filter (fn th =>
+                        (case Thm.prop_of th of
+                          _ $ p =>
+                            (case head_of p of
+                              Const (s, _) => member (op =) rec_set_names s
+                            | _ => false)
+                        | _ => false)) prems';
+                    val fresh_prems = filter (fn th =>
+                      (case Thm.prop_of th of
                         _ $ (Const (@{const_name Nominal.fresh}, _) $ _ $ _) => true
                       | _ $ (Const (@{const_name Not}, _) $ _) => true
-                      | _ => false) prems';
+                      | _ => false)) prems';
                     val Ts = map fastype_of boundsl;
 
                     val _ = warning "step 1: obtaining fresh names";
@@ -1842,7 +1850,7 @@
                     val _ = warning "step 6: (ts, pi1^-1 o pi2 o vs) in rec_set";
                     val rec_prems' = map (fn th =>
                       let
-                        val _ $ (S $ x $ y) = prop_of th;
+                        val _ $ (S $ x $ y) = Thm.prop_of th;
                         val Const (s, _) = head_of S;
                         val k = find_index (equal s) rec_set_names;
                         val pi = rpi1 @ pi2;
@@ -1853,8 +1861,8 @@
                             val l = find_index (equal T) dt_atomTs;
                             val th = nth (nth rec_equiv_thms' l) k;
                             val th' = Thm.instantiate ([],
-                              [(cterm_of thy11 (Var (("pi", 0), U)),
-                                cterm_of thy11 p)]) th;
+                              [(Thm.cterm_of thy11 (Var (("pi", 0), U)),
+                                Thm.cterm_of thy11 p)]) th;
                           in rtac th' 1 end;
                         val th' = Goal.prove context'' [] []
                           (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (S $ mk_pi x $ mk_pi y))
@@ -1868,15 +1876,17 @@
                           (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss context'' addsimps rpi1_pi2_eqs) th'
                       end) rec_prems2;
 
-                    val ihs = filter (fn th => case prop_of th of
-                      _ $ (Const (@{const_name All}, _) $ _) => true | _ => false) prems';
+                    val ihs = filter (fn th =>
+                      (case Thm.prop_of th of
+                        _ $ (Const (@{const_name All}, _) $ _) => true
+                      | _ => false)) prems';
 
                     (** pi1 o rs = pi2 o vs , rs = pi1^-1 o pi2 o vs **)
                     val _ = warning "step 7: pi1 o rs = pi2 o vs , rs = pi1^-1 o pi2 o vs";
                     val rec_eqns = map (fn (th, ih) =>
                       let
                         val th' = th RS (ih RS spec RS mp) RS sym;
-                        val _ $ (_ $ lhs $ rhs) = prop_of th';
+                        val _ $ (_ $ lhs $ rhs) = Thm.prop_of th';
                         fun strip_perm (_ $ _ $ t) = strip_perm t
                           | strip_perm t = t;
                       in
@@ -1894,7 +1904,7 @@
                       maps (fn (rec_prem, ih) =>
                         let
                           val _ $ (S $ x $ (y as Free (_, T))) =
-                            prop_of rec_prem;
+                            Thm.prop_of rec_prem;
                           val k = find_index (equal S) rec_sets;
                           val atoms = flat (map_filter (fn (bs, z) =>
                             if z = x then NONE else SOME bs) cargsl')
@@ -1981,7 +1991,7 @@
                            (fresh_prems' @ freshs2' @ calc_atm @ perm_fresh_fresh)) 1));
 
                     val _ = warning "final result";
-                    val final = Goal.prove context'' [] [] (term_of concl)
+                    val final = Goal.prove context'' [] [] (Thm.term_of concl)
                       (fn _ => cut_facts_tac [pi1_pi2_result RS sym] 1 THEN
                         full_simp_tac (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss context'' addsimps perm_fresh_fresh @
                           fresh_results @ fresh_results') 1);
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_fresh_fun.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_fresh_fun.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_fresh_fun.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -12,22 +12,22 @@
 (* FIXME proper SUBGOAL/CSUBGOAL instead of cprems_of etc. *)
 fun gen_res_inst_tac_term ctxt instf tyinst tinst elim th i st =
   let
-    val thy = theory_of_thm st;
+    val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm st;
     val cgoal = nth (cprems_of st) (i - 1);
-    val {maxidx, ...} = rep_cterm cgoal;
+    val {maxidx, ...} = Thm.rep_cterm cgoal;
     val j = maxidx + 1;
     val tyinst' = map (apfst (Logic.incr_tvar j)) tyinst;
-    val ps = Logic.strip_params (term_of cgoal);
+    val ps = Logic.strip_params (Thm.term_of cgoal);
     val Ts = map snd ps;
     val tinst' = map (fn (t, u) =>
       (head_of (Logic.incr_indexes (Ts, j) t),
        fold_rev Term.abs ps u)) tinst;
     val th' = instf
-      (map (apply2 (ctyp_of thy)) tyinst')
-      (map (apply2 (cterm_of thy)) tinst')
+      (map (apply2 (Thm.ctyp_of thy)) tyinst')
+      (map (apply2 (Thm.cterm_of thy)) tinst')
       (Thm.lift_rule cgoal th)
   in
-    compose_tac ctxt (elim, th', nprems_of th) i st
+    compose_tac ctxt (elim, th', Thm.nprems_of th) i st
   end handle General.Subscript => Seq.empty;
 (* FIXME proper SUBGOAL/CSUBGOAL instead of cprems_of etc. *)
 
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
    val at_name_inst_thm = get_dyn_thm thy ("at_"^atom_basename^"_inst") atom_basename;
    val exists_fresh' = at_name_inst_thm RS at_exists_fresh';
 (* find the variable we want to instantiate *)
-   val x = hd (Misc_Legacy.term_vars (prop_of exists_fresh'));
+   val x = hd (Misc_Legacy.term_vars (Thm.prop_of exists_fresh'));
  in
    fn st =>
    (cut_inst_tac_term' ctxt [(x,s)] exists_fresh' 1 THEN
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
     val simp_ctxt =
       ctxt addsimps (fresh_prod :: abs_fresh)
       addsimps fresh_perm_app;
-    val x = hd (tl (Misc_Legacy.term_vars (prop_of exI)));
+    val x = hd (tl (Misc_Legacy.term_vars (Thm.prop_of exI)));
     val atom_name_opt = get_inner_fresh_fun goal;
     val n = length (Logic.strip_params goal);
     (* Here we rely on the fact that the variable introduced by generate_fresh_tac *)
@@ -145,18 +145,18 @@
     val pt_name_inst = get_dyn_thm thy ("pt_"^atom_basename^"_inst") atom_basename;
     val at_name_inst = get_dyn_thm thy ("at_"^atom_basename^"_inst") atom_basename;
     fun inst_fresh vars params i st =
-   let val vars' = Misc_Legacy.term_vars (prop_of st);
-       val thy = theory_of_thm st;
+   let val vars' = Misc_Legacy.term_vars (Thm.prop_of st);
+       val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm st;
    in case subtract (op =) vars vars' of
      [x] =>
-      Seq.single (Thm.instantiate ([],[(cterm_of thy x,cterm_of thy (fold_rev Term.abs params (Bound 0)))]) st)
+      Seq.single (Thm.instantiate ([], [(Thm.cterm_of thy x, Thm.cterm_of thy (fold_rev Term.abs params (Bound 0)))]) st)
     | _ => error "fresh_fun_simp: Too many variables, please report."
    end
   in
   ((fn st =>
   let
-    val vars = Misc_Legacy.term_vars (prop_of st);
-    val params = Logic.strip_params (nth (prems_of st) (i-1))
+    val vars = Misc_Legacy.term_vars (Thm.prop_of st);
+    val params = Logic.strip_params (nth (Thm.prems_of st) (i-1))
     (* The tactics which solve the subgoals generated
        by the conditionnal rewrite rule. *)
     val post_rewrite_tacs =
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_induct.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_induct.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_induct.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
           (CONJUNCTS (ALLGOALS
             let
               val adefs = nth_list atomized_defs (j - 1);
-              val frees = fold (Term.add_frees o prop_of) adefs [];
+              val frees = fold (Term.add_frees o Thm.prop_of) adefs [];
               val xs = nth_list fixings (j - 1);
               val k = nth concls (j - 1) + more_consumes
             in
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_inductive.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_inductive.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_inductive.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -34,13 +34,13 @@
 val perm_bool = mk_meta_eq @{thm perm_bool_def};
 val perm_boolI = @{thm perm_boolI};
 val (_, [perm_boolI_pi, _]) = Drule.strip_comb (snd (Thm.dest_comb
-  (Drule.strip_imp_concl (cprop_of perm_boolI))));
+  (Drule.strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of perm_boolI))));
 
 fun mk_perm_bool pi th = th RS Drule.cterm_instantiate
   [(perm_boolI_pi, pi)] perm_boolI;
 
 fun mk_perm_bool_simproc names = Simplifier.simproc_global_i
-  (theory_of_thm perm_bool) "perm_bool" [@{term "perm pi x"}] (fn ctxt =>
+  (Thm.theory_of_thm perm_bool) "perm_bool" [@{term "perm pi x"}] (fn ctxt =>
     fn Const (@{const_name Nominal.perm}, _) $ _ $ t =>
          if member (op =) names (the_default "" (try (head_of #> dest_Const #> fst) t))
          then SOME perm_bool else NONE
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
 
 fun map_thm ctxt f tac monos opt th =
   let
-    val prop = prop_of th;
+    val prop = Thm.prop_of th;
     fun prove t =
       Goal.prove ctxt [] [] t (fn _ =>
         EVERY [cut_facts_tac [th] 1, etac rev_mp 1,
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
    eta_contract_cterm (Conjunction.mk_conjunction_balanced objs));
 
 fun first_order_mrs ths th = ths MRS
-  Thm.instantiate (first_order_matchs (cprems_of th) (map cprop_of ths)) th;
+  Thm.instantiate (first_order_matchs (cprems_of th) (map Thm.cprop_of ths)) th;
 
 fun prove_strong_ind s avoids ctxt =
   let
@@ -159,7 +159,7 @@
           commas_quote xs));
     val induct_cases = map (fst o fst) (fst (Rule_Cases.get (the
       (Induct.lookup_inductP ctxt (hd names)))));
-    val ([raw_induct'], ctxt') = Variable.import_terms false [prop_of raw_induct] ctxt;
+    val ([raw_induct'], ctxt') = Variable.import_terms false [Thm.prop_of raw_induct] ctxt;
     val concls = raw_induct' |> Logic.strip_imp_concl |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |>
       HOLogic.dest_conj |> map (HOLogic.dest_imp ##> strip_comb);
     val ps = map (fst o snd) concls;
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@
     val fsT = TFree (fs_ctxt_tyname, ind_sort);
 
     val inductive_forall_def' = Drule.instantiate'
-      [SOME (ctyp_of thy fsT)] [] inductive_forall_def;
+      [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of thy fsT)] [] inductive_forall_def;
 
     fun lift_pred' t (Free (s, T)) ts =
       list_comb (Free (s, fsT --> T), t :: ts);
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@
              full_simp_tac (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt' addsimps [@{thm id_apply}]) 1,
              REPEAT (etac conjE 1)])
           [ex] ctxt
-      in (freshs1 @ [term_of cx], freshs2 @ ths, ctxt') end;
+      in (freshs1 @ [Thm.term_of cx], freshs2 @ ths, ctxt') end;
 
     fun mk_ind_proof ctxt' thss =
       Goal.prove ctxt' [] prems' concl' (fn {prems = ihyps, context = ctxt} =>
@@ -316,14 +316,14 @@
              SUBPROOF (fn {prems = gprems, params, concl, context = ctxt', ...} =>
                let
                  val (params', (pis, z)) =
-                   chop (length params - length atomTs - 1) (map (term_of o #2) params) ||>
+                   chop (length params - length atomTs - 1) (map (Thm.term_of o #2) params) ||>
                    split_last;
                  val bvars' = map
                    (fn (Bound i, T) => (nth params' (length params' - i), T)
                      | (t, T) => (t, T)) bvars;
                  val pi_bvars = map (fn (t, _) =>
                    fold_rev (NominalDatatype.mk_perm []) pis t) bvars';
-                 val (P, ts) = strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (term_of concl));
+                 val (P, ts) = strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.term_of concl));
                  val (freshs1, freshs2, ctxt'') = fold
                    (obtain_fresh_name (ts @ pi_bvars))
                    (map snd bvars') ([], [], ctxt');
@@ -336,9 +336,9 @@
                      else pi2
                    end;
                  val pis'' = fold (concat_perm #> map) pis' pis;
-                 val env = Pattern.first_order_match thy (ihypt, prop_of ihyp)
+                 val env = Pattern.first_order_match thy (ihypt, Thm.prop_of ihyp)
                    (Vartab.empty, Vartab.empty);
-                 val ihyp' = Thm.instantiate ([], map (apply2 (cterm_of thy))
+                 val ihyp' = Thm.instantiate ([], map (apply2 (Thm.cterm_of thy))
                    (map (Envir.subst_term env) vs ~~
                     map (fold_rev (NominalDatatype.mk_perm [])
                       (rev pis' @ pis)) params' @ [z])) ihyp;
@@ -346,7 +346,7 @@
                    Simplifier.simplify (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt' addsimps [@{thm id_apply}]
                        addsimprocs [NominalDatatype.perm_simproc])
                      (Simplifier.simplify (put_simpset eqvt_ss ctxt')
-                       (fold_rev (mk_perm_bool o cterm_of thy)
+                       (fold_rev (mk_perm_bool o Thm.cterm_of thy)
                          (rev pis' @ pis) th));
                  val (gprems1, gprems2) = split_list
                    (map (fn (th, t) =>
@@ -360,7 +360,7 @@
                  val vc_compat_ths' = map (fn th =>
                    let
                      val th' = first_order_mrs gprems1 th;
-                     val (bop, lhs, rhs) = (case concl_of th' of
+                     val (bop, lhs, rhs) = (case Thm.concl_of th' of
                          _ $ (fresh $ lhs $ rhs) =>
                            (fn t => fn u => fresh $ t $ u, lhs, rhs)
                        | _ $ (_ $ (_ $ lhs $ rhs)) =>
@@ -382,14 +382,14 @@
                    (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (list_comb (P $ hd ts,
                      map (fold (NominalDatatype.mk_perm []) pis') (tl ts))))
                    (fn _ => EVERY ([simp_tac (put_simpset eqvt_ss ctxt'') 1, rtac ihyp' 1,
-                     REPEAT_DETERM_N (nprems_of ihyp - length gprems)
+                     REPEAT_DETERM_N (Thm.nprems_of ihyp - length gprems)
                        (simp_tac swap_simps_simpset 1),
                      REPEAT_DETERM_N (length gprems)
                        (simp_tac (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt''
                           addsimps [inductive_forall_def']
                           addsimprocs [NominalDatatype.perm_simproc]) 1 THEN
                         resolve_tac ctxt'' gprems2 1)]));
-                 val final = Goal.prove ctxt'' [] [] (term_of concl)
+                 val final = Goal.prove ctxt'' [] [] (Thm.term_of concl)
                    (fn _ => cut_facts_tac [th] 1 THEN full_simp_tac (put_simpset HOL_ss ctxt''
                      addsimps vc_compat_ths'' @ freshs2' @
                        perm_fresh_fresh @ fresh_atm) 1);
@@ -407,7 +407,7 @@
 
     val cases_prems = map (fn ((name, avoids), rule) =>
       let
-        val ([rule'], ctxt') = Variable.import_terms false [prop_of rule] ctxt;
+        val ([rule'], ctxt') = Variable.import_terms false [Thm.prop_of rule] ctxt;
         val prem :: prems = Logic.strip_imp_prems rule';
         val concl = Logic.strip_imp_concl rule'
       in
@@ -472,7 +472,7 @@
                 rtac (first_order_mrs case_hyps case_hyp) 1
               else
                 let
-                  val params' = map (term_of o #2 o nth (rev params)) is;
+                  val params' = map (Thm.term_of o #2 o nth (rev params)) is;
                   val tab = params' ~~ map fst qs;
                   val (hyps1, hyps2) = chop (length args) case_hyps;
                   (* turns a = t and [x1 # t, ..., xn # t] *)
@@ -483,12 +483,12 @@
                       (map (fn th =>
                          let
                            val (cf, ct) =
-                             Thm.dest_comb (Thm.dest_arg (cprop_of th));
+                             Thm.dest_comb (Thm.dest_arg (Thm.cprop_of th));
                            val arg_cong' = Drule.instantiate'
-                             [SOME (ctyp_of_term ct)]
+                             [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of_term ct)]
                              [NONE, SOME ct, SOME cf] (arg_cong RS iffD2);
                            val inst = Thm.first_order_match (ct,
-                             Thm.dest_arg (Thm.dest_arg (cprop_of th')))
+                             Thm.dest_arg (Thm.dest_arg (Thm.cprop_of th')))
                          in [th', th] MRS Thm.instantiate inst arg_cong'
                          end) ths1,
                        ths2)
@@ -505,17 +505,17 @@
                   val freshs2' = NominalDatatype.mk_not_sym freshs2;
                   val pis = map (NominalDatatype.perm_of_pair)
                     ((freshs1 ~~ map fst qs) @ (params' ~~ freshs1));
-                  val mk_pis = fold_rev mk_perm_bool (map (cterm_of thy) pis);
-                  val obj = cterm_of thy (foldr1 HOLogic.mk_conj (map (map_aterms
+                  val mk_pis = fold_rev mk_perm_bool (map (Thm.cterm_of thy) pis);
+                  val obj = Thm.cterm_of thy (foldr1 HOLogic.mk_conj (map (map_aterms
                      (fn x as Free _ =>
                            if member (op =) args x then x
                            else (case AList.lookup op = tab x of
                              SOME y => y
                            | NONE => fold_rev (NominalDatatype.mk_perm []) pis x)
-                       | x => x) o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) case_hyps));
+                       | x => x) o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) case_hyps));
                   val inst = Thm.first_order_match (Thm.dest_arg
                     (Drule.strip_imp_concl (hd (cprems_of case_hyp))), obj);
-                  val th = Goal.prove ctxt3 [] [] (term_of concl)
+                  val th = Goal.prove ctxt3 [] [] (Thm.term_of concl)
                     (fn {context = ctxt4, ...} =>
                        rtac (Thm.instantiate inst case_hyp) 1 THEN
                        SUBPROOF (fn {prems = fresh_hyps, ...} =>
@@ -610,7 +610,7 @@
       end;
     val perm_pi_simp = Global_Theory.get_thms thy "perm_pi_simp";
     val (([t], [pi]), ctxt') = ctxt |>
-      Variable.import_terms false [concl_of raw_induct] ||>>
+      Variable.import_terms false [Thm.concl_of raw_induct] ||>>
       Variable.variant_fixes ["pi"];
     val eqvt_simpset = put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt' addsimps
       (NominalThmDecls.get_eqvt_thms ctxt' @ perm_pi_simp) addsimprocs
@@ -621,7 +621,7 @@
     fun eqvt_tac pi (intr, vs) st =
       let
         fun eqvt_err s =
-          let val ([t], ctxt'') = Variable.import_terms true [prop_of intr] ctxt'
+          let val ([t], ctxt'') = Variable.import_terms true [Thm.prop_of intr] ctxt'
           in error ("Could not prove equivariance for introduction rule\n" ^
             Syntax.string_of_term ctxt'' t ^ "\n" ^ s)
           end;
@@ -630,16 +630,16 @@
             val prems' = map (fn th => the_default th (map_thm ctxt''
               (split_conj (K I) names) (etac conjunct2 1) monos NONE th)) prems;
             val prems'' = map (fn th => Simplifier.simplify eqvt_simpset
-              (mk_perm_bool (cterm_of thy pi) th)) prems';
-            val intr' = Drule.cterm_instantiate (map (cterm_of thy) vs ~~
-               map (cterm_of thy o NominalDatatype.mk_perm [] pi o term_of o #2) params)
+              (mk_perm_bool (Thm.cterm_of thy pi) th)) prems';
+            val intr' = Drule.cterm_instantiate (map (Thm.cterm_of thy) vs ~~
+               map (Thm.cterm_of thy o NominalDatatype.mk_perm [] pi o Thm.term_of o #2) params)
                intr
           in (rtac intr' THEN_ALL_NEW (TRY o resolve_tac ctxt'' prems'')) 1
           end) ctxt' 1 st
       in
         case (Seq.pull res handle THM (s, _, _) => eqvt_err s) of
           NONE => eqvt_err ("Rule does not match goal\n" ^
-            Syntax.string_of_term ctxt' (hd (prems_of st)))
+            Syntax.string_of_term ctxt' (hd (Thm.prems_of st)))
         | SOME (th, _) => Seq.single th
       end;
     val thss = map (fn atom =>
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_inductive2.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_inductive2.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_inductive2.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -38,13 +38,13 @@
 val perm_bool = mk_meta_eq @{thm perm_bool_def};
 val perm_boolI = @{thm perm_boolI};
 val (_, [perm_boolI_pi, _]) = Drule.strip_comb (snd (Thm.dest_comb
-  (Drule.strip_imp_concl (cprop_of perm_boolI))));
+  (Drule.strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of perm_boolI))));
 
 fun mk_perm_bool pi th = th RS Drule.cterm_instantiate
   [(perm_boolI_pi, pi)] perm_boolI;
 
 fun mk_perm_bool_simproc names = Simplifier.simproc_global_i
-  (theory_of_thm perm_bool) "perm_bool" [@{term "perm pi x"}] (fn ctxt =>
+  (Thm.theory_of_thm perm_bool) "perm_bool" [@{term "perm pi x"}] (fn ctxt =>
     fn Const (@{const_name Nominal.perm}, _) $ _ $ t =>
          if member (op =) names (the_default "" (try (head_of #> dest_Const #> fst) t))
          then SOME perm_bool else NONE
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
 
 fun map_thm ctxt f tac monos opt th =
   let
-    val prop = prop_of th;
+    val prop = Thm.prop_of th;
     fun prove t =
       Goal.prove ctxt [] [] t (fn _ =>
         EVERY [cut_facts_tac [th] 1, etac rev_mp 1,
@@ -144,10 +144,10 @@
   in (Logic.list_all (params, t), (rev vs, subst_bounds (vs, t))) end;
 
 fun inst_params thy (vs, p) th cts =
-  let val env = Pattern.first_order_match thy (p, prop_of th)
+  let val env = Pattern.first_order_match thy (p, Thm.prop_of th)
     (Vartab.empty, Vartab.empty)
   in Thm.instantiate ([],
-    map (Envir.subst_term env #> cterm_of thy) vs ~~ cts) th
+    map (Envir.subst_term env #> Thm.cterm_of thy) vs ~~ cts) th
   end;
 
 fun prove_strong_ind s alt_name avoids ctxt =
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@
       (Induct.lookup_inductP ctxt (hd names)))));
     val induct_cases' = if null induct_cases then replicate (length intrs) ""
       else induct_cases;
-    val ([raw_induct'], ctxt') = Variable.import_terms false [prop_of raw_induct] ctxt;
+    val ([raw_induct'], ctxt') = Variable.import_terms false [Thm.prop_of raw_induct] ctxt;
     val concls = raw_induct' |> Logic.strip_imp_concl |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |>
       HOLogic.dest_conj |> map (HOLogic.dest_imp ##> strip_comb);
     val ps = map (fst o snd) concls;
@@ -230,7 +230,7 @@
     val fsT = TFree (fs_ctxt_tyname, ind_sort);
 
     val inductive_forall_def' = Drule.instantiate'
-      [SOME (ctyp_of thy fsT)] [] inductive_forall_def;
+      [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of thy fsT)] [] inductive_forall_def;
 
     fun lift_pred' t (Free (s, T)) ts =
       list_comb (Free (s, fsT --> T), t :: ts);
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@
         val fs_atom = Global_Theory.get_thm thy
           ("fs_" ^ Long_Name.base_name atom ^ "1");
         val avoid_th = Drule.instantiate'
-          [SOME (ctyp_of thy (fastype_of p))] [SOME (cterm_of thy p)]
+          [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of thy (fastype_of p))] [SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy p)]
           ([at_inst, fin, fs_atom] MRS @{thm at_set_avoiding});
         val (([(_, cx)], th1 :: th2 :: ths), ctxt') = Obtain.result
           (fn ctxt' => EVERY
@@ -333,7 +333,7 @@
         val pTs = map NominalAtoms.mk_permT (Ts1 @ Ts2);
         val (pis1, pis2) = chop (length Ts1)
           (map Bound (length pTs - 1 downto 0));
-        val _ $ (f $ (_ $ pi $ l) $ r) = prop_of th2
+        val _ $ (f $ (_ $ pi $ l) $ r) = Thm.prop_of th2
         val th2' =
           Goal.prove ctxt' [] []
             (Logic.list_all (map (pair "pi") pTs, HOLogic.mk_Trueprop
@@ -343,7 +343,7 @@
                full_simp_tac (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt' addsimps perm_set_forget) 1) |>
           Simplifier.simplify (put_simpset eqvt_ss ctxt')
       in
-        (freshs @ [term_of cx],
+        (freshs @ [Thm.term_of cx],
          ths1 @ ths, ths2 @ [th1], ths3 @ [th2'], ctxt')
       end;
 
@@ -358,12 +358,12 @@
                let
                  val (cparams', (pis, z)) =
                    chop (length params - length atomTs - 1) (map #2 params) ||>
-                   (map term_of #> split_last);
-                 val params' = map term_of cparams'
+                   (map Thm.term_of #> split_last);
+                 val params' = map Thm.term_of cparams'
                  val sets' = map (apfst (curry subst_bounds (rev params'))) sets;
                  val pi_sets = map (fn (t, _) =>
                    fold_rev (NominalDatatype.mk_perm []) pis t) sets';
-                 val (P, ts) = strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (term_of concl));
+                 val (P, ts) = strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.term_of concl));
                  val gprems1 = map_filter (fn (th, t) =>
                    if null (preds_of ps t) then SOME th
                    else
@@ -374,7 +374,7 @@
                    let
                      val th' = gprems1 MRS inst_params thy p th cparams';
                      val (h, ts) =
-                       strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of th'))
+                       strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of th'))
                    in
                      Goal.prove ctxt' [] []
                        (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (list_comb (h,
@@ -399,12 +399,12 @@
                  val pis'' = fold_rev (concat_perm #> map) pis' pis;
                  val ihyp' = inst_params thy vs_ihypt ihyp
                    (map (fold_rev (NominalDatatype.mk_perm [])
-                      (pis' @ pis) #> cterm_of thy) params' @ [cterm_of thy z]);
+                      (pis' @ pis) #> Thm.cterm_of thy) params' @ [Thm.cterm_of thy z]);
                  fun mk_pi th =
                    Simplifier.simplify (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt' addsimps [@{thm id_apply}]
                        addsimprocs [NominalDatatype.perm_simproc])
                      (Simplifier.simplify (put_simpset eqvt_ss ctxt')
-                       (fold_rev (mk_perm_bool o cterm_of thy)
+                       (fold_rev (mk_perm_bool o Thm.cterm_of thy)
                          (pis' @ pis) th));
                  val gprems2 = map (fn (th, t) =>
                    if null (preds_of ps t) then mk_pi th
@@ -425,7 +425,7 @@
                           addsimps [inductive_forall_def']
                           addsimprocs [NominalDatatype.perm_simproc]) 1 THEN
                         resolve_tac ctxt'' gprems2 1)]));
-                 val final = Goal.prove ctxt'' [] [] (term_of concl)
+                 val final = Goal.prove ctxt'' [] [] (Thm.term_of concl)
                    (fn _ => cut_facts_tac [th] 1 THEN full_simp_tac (put_simpset HOL_ss ctxt''
                      addsimps vc_compat_ths1' @ fresh_ths1 @
                        perm_freshs_freshs') 1);
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_permeq.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_permeq.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_permeq.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -71,8 +71,8 @@
 val supports_fresh_rule = @{thm "supports_fresh"};
 
 (* pulls out dynamically a thm via the proof state *)
-fun dynamic_thms st name = Global_Theory.get_thms (theory_of_thm st) name;
-fun dynamic_thm  st name = Global_Theory.get_thm  (theory_of_thm st) name;
+fun dynamic_thms st name = Global_Theory.get_thms (Thm.theory_of_thm st) name;
+fun dynamic_thm  st name = Global_Theory.get_thm  (Thm.theory_of_thm st) name;
 
 
 (* needed in the process of fully simplifying permutations *)
@@ -203,14 +203,14 @@
       if pi1 <> pi2 then  (* only apply the composition rule in this case *)
         if T = U then    
           SOME (Drule.instantiate'
-            [SOME (ctyp_of thy (fastype_of t))]
-            [SOME (cterm_of thy pi1), SOME (cterm_of thy pi2), SOME (cterm_of thy t)]
+            [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of thy (fastype_of t))]
+            [SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy pi1), SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy pi2), SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy t)]
             (mk_meta_eq ([Global_Theory.get_thm thy ("pt_"^tname'^"_inst"),
              Global_Theory.get_thm thy ("at_"^tname'^"_inst")] MRS pt_perm_compose_aux)))
         else
           SOME (Drule.instantiate'
-            [SOME (ctyp_of thy (fastype_of t))]
-            [SOME (cterm_of thy pi1), SOME (cterm_of thy pi2), SOME (cterm_of thy t)]
+            [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of thy (fastype_of t))]
+            [SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy pi1), SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy pi2), SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy t)]
             (mk_meta_eq (Global_Theory.get_thm thy ("cp_"^tname'^"_"^uname'^"_inst") RS 
              cp1_aux)))
       else NONE
@@ -293,11 +293,11 @@
 fun finite_guess_tac_i tactical ctxt i st =
     let val goal = nth (cprems_of st) (i - 1)
     in
-      case Envir.eta_contract (Logic.strip_assums_concl (term_of goal)) of
+      case Envir.eta_contract (Logic.strip_assums_concl (Thm.term_of goal)) of
           _ $ (Const (@{const_name finite}, _) $ (Const (@{const_name Nominal.supp}, T) $ x)) =>
           let
             val cert = Thm.cterm_of (Thm.theory_of_thm st);
-            val ps = Logic.strip_params (term_of goal);
+            val ps = Logic.strip_params (Thm.term_of goal);
             val Ts = rev (map snd ps);
             val vs = collect_vars 0 x [];
             val s = fold_rev (fn v => fn s =>
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@
                 Term.range_type T) $ s);
             val supports_rule' = Thm.lift_rule goal supports_rule;
             val _ $ (_ $ S $ _) =
-              Logic.strip_assums_concl (hd (prems_of supports_rule'));
+              Logic.strip_assums_concl (hd (Thm.prems_of supports_rule'));
             val supports_rule'' = Drule.cterm_instantiate
               [(cert (head_of S), cert s')] supports_rule'
             val fin_supp = dynamic_thms st ("fin_supp")
@@ -337,11 +337,11 @@
         val ctxt1 = ctxt addsimps [Thm.symmetric fresh_def,fresh_prod,fresh_unit,conj_absorb,not_false]@fresh_atm
         val ctxt2 = ctxt addsimps [supp_prod,supp_unit,finite_Un,finite_emptyI,conj_absorb]@fin_supp
     in
-      case Logic.strip_assums_concl (term_of goal) of
+      case Logic.strip_assums_concl (Thm.term_of goal) of
           _ $ (Const (@{const_name Nominal.fresh}, Type ("fun", [T, _])) $ _ $ t) => 
           let
             val cert = Thm.cterm_of (Thm.theory_of_thm st);
-            val ps = Logic.strip_params (term_of goal);
+            val ps = Logic.strip_params (Thm.term_of goal);
             val Ts = rev (map snd ps);
             val vs = collect_vars 0 t [];
             val s = fold_rev (fn v => fn s =>
@@ -352,7 +352,7 @@
                 (Const (@{const_name Nominal.supp}, fastype_of1 (Ts, s) --> HOLogic.mk_setT T) $ s);
             val supports_fresh_rule' = Thm.lift_rule goal supports_fresh_rule;
             val _ $ (_ $ S $ _) =
-              Logic.strip_assums_concl (hd (prems_of supports_fresh_rule'));
+              Logic.strip_assums_concl (hd (Thm.prems_of supports_fresh_rule'));
             val supports_fresh_rule'' = Drule.cterm_instantiate
               [(cert (head_of S), cert s')] supports_fresh_rule'
           in
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_primrec.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_primrec.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_primrec.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -296,14 +296,14 @@
 
     val rec_rewritess =
       unflat (map (fn (_, (_, _, constrs)) => constrs) descr) rec_rewrites;
-    val fvars = rec_rewrites |> hd |> concl_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |>
+    val fvars = rec_rewrites |> hd |> Thm.concl_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |>
       HOLogic.dest_eq |> fst |> strip_comb |> snd |> take_prefix is_Var |> fst;
     val (pvars, ctxtvars) = List.partition
       (equal HOLogic.boolT o body_type o snd)
       (subtract (op =)
-        (Term.add_vars (concl_of (hd rec_rewrites)) [])
+        (Term.add_vars (Thm.concl_of (hd rec_rewrites)) [])
         (fold_rev (Term.add_vars o Logic.strip_assums_concl)
-           (prems_of (hd rec_rewrites)) []));
+           (Thm.prems_of (hd rec_rewrites)) []));
     val cfs = defs' |> hd |> snd |> strip_comb |> snd |>
       curry (List.take o swap) (length fvars) |> map cert;
     val invs' = (case invs of
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@
       let
         val (i, j, cargs) = mk_idx eq
         val th = nth (nth rec_rewritess i) j;
-        val cargs' = th |> concl_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |>
+        val cargs' = th |> Thm.concl_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |>
           HOLogic.dest_eq |> fst |> strip_comb |> snd |> List.last |>
           strip_comb |> snd
       in (cargs, Logic.strip_imp_prems eq,
@@ -328,12 +328,12 @@
           (map cert cargs' ~~ map (cert o Free) cargs)) th)
       end) eqns';
 
-    val prems = foldr1 (common_prefix op aconv) (map (prems_of o #3) rec_rewrites');
+    val prems = foldr1 (common_prefix op aconv) (map (Thm.prems_of o #3) rec_rewrites');
     val cprems = map cert prems;
     val asms = map Thm.assume cprems;
     val premss = map (fn (cargs, eprems, eqn) =>
       map (fn t => fold_rev (Logic.all o Free) cargs (Logic.list_implies (eprems, t)))
-        (List.drop (prems_of eqn, length prems))) rec_rewrites';
+        (List.drop (Thm.prems_of eqn, length prems))) rec_rewrites';
     val cpremss = map (map cert) premss;
     val asmss = map (map Thm.assume) cpremss;
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_thmdecls.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_thmdecls.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_thmdecls.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -132,7 +132,8 @@
 fun eqvt_add_del_aux flag orig_thm context = 
   let
     val thy = Context.theory_of context
-    val thms_to_be_added = (case (prop_of orig_thm) of
+    val thms_to_be_added =
+      (case Thm.prop_of orig_thm of
         (* case: eqvt-lemma is of the implicational form *)
         (Const(@{const_name Pure.imp}, _) $ (Const (@{const_name Trueprop},_) $ hyp) $ (Const (@{const_name Trueprop},_) $ concl)) =>
           let
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Orderings.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Orderings.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Orderings.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -608,7 +608,7 @@
 in
 
 fun antisym_le_simproc ctxt ct =
-  (case term_of ct of
+  (case Thm.term_of ct of
     (le as Const (_, T)) $ r $ s =>
      (let
         val prems = Simplifier.prems_of ctxt;
@@ -627,7 +627,7 @@
   | _ => NONE);
 
 fun antisym_less_simproc ctxt ct =
-  (case term_of ct of
+  (case Thm.term_of ct of
     NotC $ ((less as Const(_,T)) $ r $ s) =>
      (let
        val prems = Simplifier.prems_of ctxt;
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Probability/Giry_Monad.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Probability/Giry_Monad.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Probability/Giry_Monad.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@
 fun subprob_cong thm ctxt = (
   let
     val thm' = Thm.transfer (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt) thm
-    val free = thm' |> concl_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> dest_comb |> fst |>
+    val free = thm' |> Thm.concl_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> dest_comb |> fst |>
       dest_comb |> snd |> strip_abs_body |> head_of |> is_Free
   in
     if free then ([], Measurable.add_local_cong (thm' RS @{thm subprob_measurableD(2)}) ctxt)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Probability/measurable.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Probability/measurable.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Probability/measurable.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -114,7 +114,7 @@
 
 fun is_too_generic thm =
   let 
-    val concl = concl_of thm
+    val concl = Thm.concl_of thm
     val concl' = HOLogic.dest_Trueprop concl handle TERM _ => concl
   in is_Var (head_of concl') end
 
@@ -126,19 +126,21 @@
   if Config.get ctxt debug then print_tac ctxt (msg ()) THEN f else f
 
 fun nth_hol_goal thm i =
-  HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_imp_concl (strip_all_body (nth (prems_of thm) (i - 1))))
+  HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_imp_concl (strip_all_body (nth (Thm.prems_of thm) (i - 1))))
 
 fun dest_measurable_fun t =
   (case t of
     (Const (@{const_name "Set.member"}, _) $ f $ (Const (@{const_name "measurable"}, _) $ _ $ _)) => f
   | _ => raise (TERM ("not a measurability predicate", [t])))
 
-fun not_measurable_prop n thm = if length (prems_of thm) < n then false else
-  (case nth_hol_goal thm n of
-    (Const (@{const_name "Set.member"}, _) $ _ $ (Const (@{const_name "sets"}, _) $ _)) => false
-  | (Const (@{const_name "Set.member"}, _) $ _ $ (Const (@{const_name "measurable"}, _) $ _ $ _)) => false
-  | _ => true)
-  handle TERM _ => true;
+fun not_measurable_prop n thm =
+  if length (Thm.prems_of thm) < n then false
+  else
+    (case nth_hol_goal thm n of
+      (Const (@{const_name "Set.member"}, _) $ _ $ (Const (@{const_name "sets"}, _) $ _)) => false
+    | (Const (@{const_name "Set.member"}, _) $ _ $ (Const (@{const_name "measurable"}, _) $ _ $ _)) => false
+    | _ => true)
+    handle TERM _ => true;
 
 fun indep (Bound i) t b = i < b orelse t <= i
   | indep (f $ t) top bot = indep f top bot andalso indep t top bot
@@ -201,7 +203,7 @@
 fun measurable_tac ctxt facts =
   let
     fun debug_fact msg thm () =
-      msg ^ " " ^ Pretty.str_of (Syntax.pretty_term ctxt (prop_of thm))
+      msg ^ " " ^ Pretty.str_of (Syntax.pretty_term ctxt (Thm.prop_of thm))
 
     fun IF' c t i = COND (c i) (t i) no_tac
 
@@ -225,7 +227,7 @@
       | is_sets_eq _ = false
 
     val cong_thms = get_cong (Context.Proof ctxt) @
-      filter (fn thm => concl_of thm |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> is_sets_eq handle TERM _ => false) facts
+      filter (fn thm => Thm.concl_of thm |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> is_sets_eq handle TERM _ => false) facts
 
     fun sets_cong_tac i =
       Subgoal.FOCUS (fn {context = ctxt', prems = prems, ...} => (
@@ -235,7 +237,7 @@
           r_tac "cong intro" [elem_congI]
           THEN' SOLVED' (fn i => REPEAT_DETERM (
               ((r_tac "cong solve" (cong_thms @ [@{thm refl}])
-                ORELSE' IF' (fn i => fn thm => nprems_of thm > i)
+                ORELSE' IF' (fn i => fn thm => Thm.nprems_of thm > i)
                   (SOLVED' (asm_full_simp_tac ctxt''))) i)))
         end) 1) ctxt i
         THEN flexflex_tac ctxt
@@ -249,7 +251,7 @@
           val f = dest_measurable_fun (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop t)
           fun cert f = map (Option.map (f (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt)))
           fun inst (ts, Ts) =
-            Drule.instantiate' (cert ctyp_of Ts) (cert cterm_of ts)
+            Drule.instantiate' (cert Thm.ctyp_of Ts) (cert Thm.cterm_of ts)
               @{thm measurable_compose_countable}
         in r_tac "split countable" (cnt_prefixes ctxt f |> map inst) i end
         handle TERM _ => no_tac) 1)
@@ -267,7 +269,7 @@
 
 fun simproc ctxt redex =
   let
-    val t = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (term_of redex);
+    val t = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (Thm.term_of redex);
     fun tac {context = ctxt, prems = _ } =
       SOLVE (measurable_tac ctxt (Simplifier.prems_of ctxt));
   in try (fn () => Goal.prove ctxt [] [] t tac RS @{thm Eq_TrueI}) () end;
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Product_Type.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Product_Type.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Product_Type.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
 
 simproc_setup unit_eq ("x::unit") = {*
   fn _ => fn _ => fn ct =>
-    if HOLogic.is_unit (term_of ct) then NONE
+    if HOLogic.is_unit (Thm.term_of ct) then NONE
     else SOME (mk_meta_eq @{thm unit_eq})
 *}
 
@@ -579,8 +579,10 @@
     | eta_proc _ _ = NONE;
 end;
 *}
-simproc_setup split_beta ("split f z") = {* fn _ => fn ctxt => fn ct => beta_proc ctxt (term_of ct) *}
-simproc_setup split_eta ("split f") = {* fn _ => fn ctxt => fn ct => eta_proc ctxt (term_of ct) *}
+simproc_setup split_beta ("split f z") =
+  {* fn _ => fn ctxt => fn ct => beta_proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct) *}
+simproc_setup split_eta ("split f") =
+  {* fn _ => fn ctxt => fn ct => eta_proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct) *}
 
 lemmas split_beta [mono] = prod.case_eq_if
 
@@ -1309,7 +1311,7 @@
 (* simplify {(x1, ..., xn). (x1, ..., xn) : S} to S *)
 simproc_setup Collect_mem ("Collect t") = {*
   fn _ => fn ctxt => fn ct =>
-    (case term_of ct of
+    (case Thm.term_of ct of
       S as Const (@{const_name Collect}, Type (@{type_name fun}, [_, T])) $ t =>
         let val (u, _, ps) = HOLogic.strip_psplits t in
           (case u of
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Prolog/prolog.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Prolog/prolog.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Prolog/prolog.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -43,15 +43,15 @@
   | _ (* atom *)              => true;
 
 val check_HOHH_tac1 = PRIMITIVE (fn thm =>
-        if isG (concl_of thm) then thm else raise not_HOHH);
+        if isG (Thm.concl_of thm) then thm else raise not_HOHH);
 val check_HOHH_tac2 = PRIMITIVE (fn thm =>
-        if forall isG (prems_of thm) then thm else raise not_HOHH);
-fun check_HOHH thm  = (if isD (concl_of thm) andalso forall isG (prems_of thm)
+        if forall isG (Thm.prems_of thm) then thm else raise not_HOHH);
+fun check_HOHH thm  = (if isD (Thm.concl_of thm) andalso forall isG (Thm.prems_of thm)
                         then thm else raise not_HOHH);
 
 fun atomizeD ctxt thm =
   let
-    fun at  thm = case concl_of thm of
+    fun at  thm = case Thm.concl_of thm of
       _$(Const(@{const_name All} ,_)$Abs(s,_,_))=>
         let val s' = if s="P" then "PP" else s
         in at(thm RS (Rule_Insts.read_instantiate ctxt [(("x", 0), s')] [s'] spec)) end
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Proofs/Lambda/WeakNorm.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Proofs/Lambda/WeakNorm.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Proofs/Lambda/WeakNorm.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -432,12 +432,12 @@
 fun dummyf _ = error "dummy";
 
 val ct1 = @{cterm "%f. ((%f x. f (f (f x))) ((%f x. f (f (f (f x)))) f))"};
-val (dB1, _) = @{code type_NF} (typing_of_term [] dummyf (term_of ct1));
-val ct1' = cterm_of @{theory} (term_of_dB [] (#T (rep_cterm ct1)) dB1);
+val (dB1, _) = @{code type_NF} (typing_of_term [] dummyf (Thm.term_of ct1));
+val ct1' = Thm.cterm_of @{theory} (term_of_dB [] (#T (Thm.rep_cterm ct1)) dB1);
 
 val ct2 = @{cterm "%f x. (%x. f x x) ((%x. f x x) ((%x. f x x) ((%x. f x x) ((%x. f x x) ((%x. f x x) x)))))"};
-val (dB2, _) = @{code type_NF} (typing_of_term [] dummyf (term_of ct2));
-val ct2' = cterm_of @{theory} (term_of_dB [] (#T (rep_cterm ct2)) dB2);
+val (dB2, _) = @{code type_NF} (typing_of_term [] dummyf (Thm.term_of ct2));
+val ct2' = Thm.cterm_of @{theory} (term_of_dB [] (#T (Thm.rep_cterm ct2)) dB2);
 *}
 
 end
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Statespace/distinct_tree_prover.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Statespace/distinct_tree_prover.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Statespace/distinct_tree_prover.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -90,12 +90,12 @@
  *)
 fun instantiate instTs insts =
   let
-    val instTs' = map (fn (T, U) => (dest_TVar (typ_of T), typ_of U)) instTs;
+    val instTs' = map (fn (T, U) => (dest_TVar (Thm.typ_of T), Thm.typ_of U)) instTs;
     fun substT x = (case AList.lookup (op =) instTs' x of NONE => TVar x | SOME T' => T');
     fun mapT_and_recertify ct =
       let
-        val thy = theory_of_cterm ct;
-      in (cterm_of thy (Term.map_types (Term.map_type_tvar substT) (term_of ct))) end;
+        val thy = Thm.theory_of_cterm ct;
+      in (Thm.cterm_of thy (Term.map_types (Term.map_type_tvar substT) (Thm.term_of ct))) end;
     val insts' = map (apfst mapT_and_recertify) insts;
   in Thm.instantiate (instTs, insts') end;
 
@@ -133,7 +133,8 @@
     fun mtch (env as (tyinsts, insts)) =
       fn (Var (ixn, T), ct) =>
           (case AList.lookup (op =) insts ixn of
-            NONE => (naive_typ_match (T, typ_of (ctyp_of_term ct)) tyinsts, (ixn, ct) :: insts)
+            NONE =>
+              (naive_typ_match (T, Thm.typ_of (Thm.ctyp_of_term ct)) tyinsts, (ixn, ct) :: insts)
           | SOME _ => env)
        | (f $ t, ct) =>
           let val (cf, ct') = Thm.dest_comb ct;
@@ -144,14 +145,16 @@
 
 fun discharge prems rule =
   let
-    val thy = theory_of_thm (hd prems);
+    val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm (hd prems);
     val (tyinsts,insts) =
-      fold naive_cterm_first_order_match (prems_of rule ~~ map cprop_of prems) ([], []);
+      fold naive_cterm_first_order_match (Thm.prems_of rule ~~ map Thm.cprop_of prems) ([], []);
 
     val tyinsts' =
-      map (fn (v, (S, U)) => (ctyp_of thy (TVar (v, S)), ctyp_of thy U)) tyinsts;
+      map (fn (v, (S, U)) =>
+        (Thm.ctyp_of thy (TVar (v, S)), Thm.ctyp_of thy U)) tyinsts;
     val insts' =
-      map (fn (idxn, ct) => (cterm_of thy (Var (idxn, typ_of (ctyp_of_term ct))), ct)) insts;
+      map (fn (idxn, ct) =>
+        (Thm.cterm_of thy (Var (idxn, Thm.typ_of (Thm.ctyp_of_term ct))), ct)) insts;
     val rule' = Thm.instantiate (tyinsts', insts') rule;
   in fold Thm.elim_implies prems rule' end;
 
@@ -160,7 +163,7 @@
 val (l_in_set_root, x_in_set_root, r_in_set_root) =
   let
     val (Node_l_x_d, r) =
-      cprop_of @{thm in_set_root}
+      Thm.cprop_of @{thm in_set_root}
       |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2
       |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2 |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2 |> Thm.dest_comb;
     val (Node_l, x) = Node_l_x_d |> Thm.dest_comb |> #1 |> Thm.dest_comb;
@@ -170,7 +173,7 @@
 val (x_in_set_left, r_in_set_left) =
   let
     val (Node_l_x_d, r) =
-      cprop_of @{thm in_set_left}
+      Thm.cprop_of @{thm in_set_left}
       |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2 |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2
       |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2 |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2 |> Thm.dest_comb;
     val x = Node_l_x_d |> Thm.dest_comb |> #1 |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2;
@@ -179,7 +182,7 @@
 val (x_in_set_right, l_in_set_right) =
   let
     val (Node_l, x) =
-      cprop_of @{thm in_set_right}
+      Thm.cprop_of @{thm in_set_right}
       |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2 |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2
       |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2 |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2
       |> Thm.dest_comb |> #1 |> Thm.dest_comb |> #1
@@ -207,25 +210,25 @@
 
     val (ps, x_rest, y_rest) = split_common_prefix x_path y_path;
     val dist_subtree_thm = dist_subtree ps dist_thm;
-    val subtree = cprop_of dist_subtree_thm |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2 |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2;
+    val subtree = Thm.cprop_of dist_subtree_thm |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2 |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2;
     val (_, [l, _, _, r]) = Drule.strip_comb subtree;
 
     fun in_set ps tree =
       let
         val (_, [l, x, _, r]) = Drule.strip_comb tree;
-        val xT = ctyp_of_term x;
+        val xT = Thm.ctyp_of_term x;
       in
         (case ps of
           [] =>
             instantiate
-              [(ctyp_of_term x_in_set_root, xT)]
+              [(Thm.ctyp_of_term x_in_set_root, xT)]
               [(l_in_set_root, l), (x_in_set_root, x), (r_in_set_root, r)] @{thm in_set_root}
         | Left :: ps' =>
             let
               val in_set_l = in_set ps' l;
               val in_set_left' =
                 instantiate
-                  [(ctyp_of_term x_in_set_left, xT)]
+                  [(Thm.ctyp_of_term x_in_set_left, xT)]
                   [(x_in_set_left, x), (r_in_set_left, r)] @{thm in_set_left};
             in discharge [in_set_l] in_set_left' end
         | Right :: ps' =>
@@ -233,7 +236,7 @@
               val in_set_r = in_set ps' r;
               val in_set_right' =
                 instantiate
-                  [(ctyp_of_term x_in_set_right, xT)]
+                  [(Thm.ctyp_of_term x_in_set_right, xT)]
                   [(x_in_set_right, x), (l_in_set_right, l)] @{thm in_set_right};
             in discharge [in_set_r] in_set_right' end)
       end;
@@ -286,29 +289,29 @@
         @{thm subtract_Tip} |> Thm.cprop_of |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2 |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2
         |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2;
       val [alpha] = ct |> Thm.ctyp_of_term |> Thm.dest_ctyp;
-    in (alpha, #1 (dest_Var (term_of ct))) end;
+    in (alpha, #1 (dest_Var (Thm.term_of ct))) end;
 in
 
 fun subtractProver (Const (@{const_name Tip}, T)) ct dist_thm =
       let
         val ct' = dist_thm |> Thm.cprop_of |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2 |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2;
-        val thy = theory_of_cterm ct;
+        val thy = Thm.theory_of_cterm ct;
         val [alphaI] = #2 (dest_Type T);
       in
         Thm.instantiate
-          ([(alpha, ctyp_of thy alphaI)],
-           [(cterm_of thy (Var (v, treeT alphaI)), ct')]) @{thm subtract_Tip}
+          ([(alpha, Thm.ctyp_of thy alphaI)],
+           [(Thm.cterm_of thy (Var (v, treeT alphaI)), ct')]) @{thm subtract_Tip}
       end
   | subtractProver (Const (@{const_name Node}, nT) $ l $ x $ d $ r) ct dist_thm =
       let
         val ct' = dist_thm |> Thm.cprop_of |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2 |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2;
         val (_, [cl, _, _, cr]) = Drule.strip_comb ct;
-        val ps = the (find_tree x (term_of ct'));
+        val ps = the (find_tree x (Thm.term_of ct'));
         val del_tree = deleteProver dist_thm ps;
         val dist_thm' = discharge [del_tree, dist_thm] @{thm delete_Some_all_distinct};
-        val sub_l = subtractProver (term_of cl) cl (dist_thm');
+        val sub_l = subtractProver (Thm.term_of cl) cl (dist_thm');
         val sub_r =
-          subtractProver (term_of cr) cr
+          subtractProver (Thm.term_of cr) cr
             (discharge [sub_l, dist_thm'] @{thm subtract_Some_all_distinct_res});
       in discharge [del_tree, sub_l, sub_r] @{thm subtract_Node} end;
 
@@ -317,7 +320,7 @@
 fun distinct_implProver dist_thm ct =
   let
     val ctree = ct |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2 |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2;
-    val sub = subtractProver (term_of ctree) ctree dist_thm;
+    val sub = subtractProver (Thm.term_of ctree) ctree dist_thm;
   in @{thm subtract_Some_all_distinct} OF [sub, dist_thm] end;
 
 fun get_fst_success f [] = NONE
@@ -329,8 +332,8 @@
 fun neq_x_y ctxt x y name =
   (let
     val dist_thm = the (try (Proof_Context.get_thm ctxt) name);
-    val ctree = cprop_of dist_thm |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2 |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2;
-    val tree = term_of ctree;
+    val ctree = Thm.cprop_of dist_thm |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2 |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2;
+    val tree = Thm.term_of ctree;
     val x_path = the (find_tree x tree);
     val y_path = the (find_tree y tree);
     val thm = distinctTreeProver dist_thm x_path y_path;
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Statespace/state_fun.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Statespace/state_fun.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Statespace/state_fun.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -56,14 +56,14 @@
       let val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt in
         (case t of (Const (@{const_name HOL.conj},_) $ P $ Q) =>
           let
-            val P_P' = Simplifier.rewrite ctxt (cterm_of thy P);
-            val P' = P_P' |> prop_of |> Logic.dest_equals |> #2;
+            val P_P' = Simplifier.rewrite ctxt (Thm.cterm_of thy P);
+            val P' = P_P' |> Thm.prop_of |> Logic.dest_equals |> #2;
           in
             if isFalse P' then SOME (conj1_False OF [P_P'])
             else
               let
-                val Q_Q' = Simplifier.rewrite ctxt (cterm_of thy Q);
-                val Q' = Q_Q' |> prop_of |> Logic.dest_equals |> #2;
+                val Q_Q' = Simplifier.rewrite ctxt (Thm.cterm_of thy Q);
+                val Q' = Q_Q' |> Thm.prop_of |> Logic.dest_equals |> #2;
               in
                 if isFalse Q' then SOME (conj2_False OF [Q_Q'])
                 else if isTrue P' andalso isTrue Q' then SOME (conj_True OF [P_P', Q_Q'])
@@ -141,12 +141,12 @@
             | mk_upds s = (Var (("s", mi + 1), sT), mi + 2);
 
           val ct =
-            cterm_of thy (Const (@{const_name StateFun.lookup}, lT) $ destr $ n $ fst (mk_upds s));
+            Thm.cterm_of thy (Const (@{const_name StateFun.lookup}, lT) $ destr $ n $ fst (mk_upds s));
           val basic_ss = #1 (Data.get (Context.Proof ctxt));
           val ctxt' = ctxt |> Config.put simp_depth_limit 100 |> put_simpset basic_ss;
           val thm = Simplifier.rewrite ctxt' ct;
         in
-          if (op aconv) (Logic.dest_equals (prop_of thm))
+          if (op aconv) (Logic.dest_equals (Thm.prop_of thm))
           then NONE
           else SOME thm
         end
@@ -251,7 +251,7 @@
                     Goal.prove ctxt0 [] []
                       (Logic.list_all (vars, Logic.mk_equals (trm, trm')))
                       (fn _ => rtac meta_ext 1 THEN simp_tac ctxt1 1);
-                  val eq2 = Simplifier.asm_full_rewrite ctxt2 (Thm.dest_equals_rhs (cprop_of eq1));
+                  val eq2 = Simplifier.asm_full_rewrite ctxt2 (Thm.dest_equals_rhs (Thm.cprop_of eq1));
                 in SOME (Thm.transitive eq1 eq2) end
             | _ => NONE)
           end
@@ -375,7 +375,7 @@
           val ctxt = Context.proof_of context;
           val (lookup_ss, ex_lookup_ss, simprocs_active) = Data.get context;
           val (lookup_ss', ex_lookup_ss') =
-            (case concl_of thm of
+            (case Thm.concl_of thm of
               (_ $ ((Const (@{const_name Ex}, _) $ _))) =>
                 (lookup_ss, simpset_map ctxt (Simplifier.add_simp thm) ex_lookup_ss)
             | _ =>
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Statespace/state_space.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Statespace/state_space.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Statespace/state_space.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -190,8 +190,8 @@
 fun neq_x_y ctxt x y =
   (let
     val dist_thm = the (get_dist_thm (Context.Proof ctxt) (#1 (dest_Free x)));
-    val ctree = cprop_of dist_thm |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2 |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2;
-    val tree = term_of ctree;
+    val ctree = Thm.cprop_of dist_thm |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2 |> Thm.dest_comb |> #2;
+    val tree = Thm.term_of ctree;
     val x_path = the (DistinctTreeProver.find_tree x tree);
     val y_path = the (DistinctTreeProver.find_tree y tree);
     val thm = DistinctTreeProver.distinctTreeProver dist_thm x_path y_path;
@@ -238,7 +238,7 @@
     val dist_thm_name = distinct_compsN;
 
     val dist_thm_full_name = dist_thm_name;
-    fun comps_of_thm thm = prop_of thm
+    fun comps_of_thm thm = Thm.prop_of thm
              |> (fn (_$(_$t)) => DistinctTreeProver.dest_tree t) |> map (fst o dest_Free);
 
     fun type_attr phi = Thm.declaration_attribute (fn thm => fn context =>
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/TLA/Action.thy
--- a/src/HOL/TLA/Action.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/TLA/Action.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -116,7 +116,7 @@
 val action_rewrite = int_rewrite
 
 fun action_use ctxt th =
-    case (concl_of th) of
+    case Thm.concl_of th of
       Const _ $ (Const (@{const_name Valid}, _) $ _) =>
               (flatten (action_unlift ctxt th) handle THM _ => th)
     | _ => th;
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/TLA/Intensional.thy
--- a/src/HOL/TLA/Intensional.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/TLA/Intensional.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -271,18 +271,18 @@
     fun matchsome tha thb =
       let fun hmatch 0 = raise THM("matchsome: no match", 0, [tha,thb])
             | hmatch n = matchres tha n thb handle THM _ => hmatch (n-1)
-      in hmatch (nprems_of thb) end
+      in hmatch (Thm.nprems_of thb) end
 
     fun hflatten t =
-        case (concl_of t) of
-          Const _ $ (Const (@{const_name HOL.implies}, _) $ _ $ _) => hflatten (t RS mp)
-        | _ => (hflatten (matchsome conjI t)) handle THM _ => zero_var_indexes t
+      case Thm.concl_of t of
+        Const _ $ (Const (@{const_name HOL.implies}, _) $ _ $ _) => hflatten (t RS mp)
+      | _ => (hflatten (matchsome conjI t)) handle THM _ => zero_var_indexes t
   in
     hflatten t
   end
 
 fun int_use ctxt th =
-    case (concl_of th) of
+    case Thm.concl_of th of
       Const _ $ (Const (@{const_name Valid}, _) $ _) =>
               (flatten (int_unlift ctxt th) handle THM _ => th)
     | _ => th
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/TLA/TLA.thy
--- a/src/HOL/TLA/TLA.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/TLA/TLA.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -126,7 +126,7 @@
 val temp_rewrite = int_rewrite
 
 fun temp_use ctxt th =
-  case (concl_of th) of
+  case Thm.concl_of th of
     Const _ $ (Const (@{const_name Intensional.Valid}, _) $ _) =>
             ((flatten (temp_unlift ctxt th)) handle THM _ => th)
   | _ => th;
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/TPTP/TPTP_Parser/tptp_reconstruct.ML
--- a/src/HOL/TPTP/TPTP_Parser/tptp_reconstruct.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/TPTP/TPTP_Parser/tptp_reconstruct.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -737,7 +737,7 @@
   in
     (*Instantiate the abstract rule based on the contents of the
       required instance*)
-    diff_and_instantiate ctxt abs_rule_thm (prop_of abs_rule_thm) rule_t
+    diff_and_instantiate ctxt abs_rule_thm (Thm.prop_of abs_rule_thm) rule_t
   end
 
 
@@ -1089,7 +1089,7 @@
           raise SKELETON
         (*FIXME or classify it as follows:
           [(Caboose,
-            prop_of @{thm asm_rl}
+            Thm.prop_of @{thm asm_rl}
             |> SOME,
             SOME (@{thm asm_rl}, TRY (HEADGOAL atac)))]
          *)
@@ -1097,17 +1097,17 @@
           case hd skel of
               Assumed =>
                 (hd skel,
-                 prop_of @{thm asm_rl}
+                 Thm.prop_of @{thm asm_rl}
                  |> SOME,
                  SOME (@{thm asm_rl}, TRY (HEADGOAL atac))) :: rest memo ctxt
             | Caboose =>
                 [(Caboose,
-                  prop_of @{thm asm_rl}
+                  Thm.prop_of @{thm asm_rl}
                   |> SOME,
                   SOME (@{thm asm_rl}, TRY (HEADGOAL atac)))]
             | Unconjoin =>
                 (hd skel,
-                 prop_of @{thm conjI}
+                 Thm.prop_of @{thm conjI}
                  |> SOME,
                  SOME (@{thm conjI}, rtac @{thm conjI} 1)) :: rest memo ctxt
             | Split (split_node, solved_node, antes) =>
@@ -1126,7 +1126,7 @@
                       simulate_split ctxt split_fmla minor_prems_assumps conclusion
                 in
                   (hd skel,
-                   prop_of split_thm
+                   Thm.prop_of split_thm
                    |> SOME,
                    SOME (split_thm, rtac split_thm 1)) :: rest memo ctxt
                 end
@@ -1190,7 +1190,7 @@
                           |> Global_Theory.get_thm thy
                 in
                   (hd skel,
-                   prop_of (def_thm thy)
+                   Thm.prop_of (def_thm thy)
                    |> SOME,
                    SOME (def_thm thy,
                          HEADGOAL (rtac_wrap def_thm))) :: rest memo ctxt
@@ -1206,7 +1206,7 @@
                           |> Global_Theory.get_thm thy
                 in
                   (hd skel,
-                   prop_of ax_thm
+                   Thm.prop_of ax_thm
                    |> SOME,
                    SOME (ax_thm, rtac ax_thm 1)) :: rest memo ctxt
                 end
@@ -1256,11 +1256,11 @@
     let
       val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
     in
-      (Synth_step "ccontr", prop_of @{thm ccontr} |> SOME,
+      (Synth_step "ccontr", Thm.prop_of @{thm ccontr} |> SOME,
        SOME (@{thm ccontr}, rtac @{thm ccontr} 1)) ::
-      (Synth_step "neg_eq_false", prop_of neg_eq_false |> SOME,
+      (Synth_step "neg_eq_false", Thm.prop_of neg_eq_false |> SOME,
        SOME (neg_eq_false, dtac neg_eq_false 1)) ::
-      (Synth_step "sas_if_needed_tac", prop_of @{thm asm_rl}(*FIXME *) |> SOME,
+      (Synth_step "sas_if_needed_tac", Thm.prop_of @{thm asm_rl} (*FIXME *) |> SOME,
        SOME (sas_if_needed_tac ctxt prob_name)) ::
       skel_to_naive_tactic_dbg prover_tac ctxt prob_name
        (make_skeleton ctxt
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/TPTP/TPTP_Parser/tptp_reconstruct_library.ML
--- a/src/HOL/TPTP/TPTP_Parser/tptp_reconstruct_library.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/TPTP/TPTP_Parser/tptp_reconstruct_library.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -563,7 +563,7 @@
   In addition to the abstract thm ("scheme_thm"), this function is
   also supplied with the (sub)term of the abstract thm ("scheme_t")
   we want to use in the diff, in case only part of "scheme_t"
-  might be needed (not the whole "prop_of scheme_thm")*)
+  might be needed (not the whole "Thm.prop_of scheme_thm")*)
 fun diff_and_instantiate ctxt scheme_thm scheme_t instance_t =
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
@@ -572,14 +572,14 @@
       diff thy (scheme_t, instance_t)
 
     (*valuation of type variables*)
-    val typeval = map (apply2 (ctyp_of thy)) type_pairing
+    val typeval = map (apply2 (Thm.ctyp_of thy)) type_pairing
 
     val typeval_env =
       map (apfst dest_TVar) type_pairing
     (*valuation of term variables*)
     val termval =
       map (apfst (type_devar typeval_env)) term_pairing
-      |> map (apply2 (cterm_of thy))
+      |> map (apply2 (Thm.cterm_of thy))
   in
     Thm.instantiate (typeval, termval) scheme_thm
   end
@@ -670,7 +670,7 @@
 fun head_quantified_variable ctxt i = fn st =>
   let
     val gls =
-      prop_of st
+      Thm.prop_of st
       |> Logic.strip_horn
       |> fst
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/TPTP/TPTP_Proof_Reconstruction.thy
--- a/src/HOL/TPTP/TPTP_Proof_Reconstruction.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/TPTP/TPTP_Proof_Reconstruction.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@
 fun inst_parametermatch_tac ctxt thms i = fn st =>
   let
     val gls =
-      prop_of st
+      Thm.prop_of st
       |> Logic.strip_horn
       |> fst
 
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@
 fun nominal_inst_parametermatch_tac ctxt thm i = fn st =>
   let
     val gls =
-      prop_of st
+      Thm.prop_of st
       |> Logic.strip_horn
       |> fst
 
@@ -247,7 +247,7 @@
 fun canonicalise_qtfr_order ctxt i = fn st =>
   let
     val gls =
-      prop_of st
+      Thm.prop_of st
       |> Logic.strip_horn
       |> fst
   in
@@ -649,7 +649,7 @@
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
 
     val gls =
-      prop_of st
+      Thm.prop_of st
       |> Logic.strip_horn
       |> fst
 
@@ -689,7 +689,7 @@
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
 
     val gls =
-      prop_of st
+      Thm.prop_of st
       |> Logic.strip_horn
       |> fst
 
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@
     val _ = @{assert} (arity > 0)
 
     val gls =
-      prop_of st
+      Thm.prop_of st
       |> Logic.strip_horn
       |> fst
 
@@ -809,7 +809,7 @@
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
 
     val gls =
-      prop_of st
+      Thm.prop_of st
       |> Logic.strip_horn
       |> fst
 
@@ -917,7 +917,7 @@
     (* val contextualise = fold absdummy (map snd params) *)
     val contextualise = fold absfree params
 
-    val skolem_cts = map (contextualise #> cterm_of thy) skolem_terms
+    val skolem_cts = map (contextualise #> Thm.cterm_of thy) skolem_terms
 
 
 (*now the instantiation code*)
@@ -937,7 +937,7 @@
         fun make_var pre_var =
           the_single pre_var
           |> Var
-          |> cterm_of thy
+          |> Thm.cterm_of thy
           |> SOME
       in
         if null pre_var then NONE
@@ -1049,7 +1049,7 @@
 fun find_dec_arity i = fn st =>
   let
     val gls =
-      prop_of st
+      Thm.prop_of st
       |> Logic.strip_horn
       |> fst
   in
@@ -1093,7 +1093,7 @@
 fun breakdown_inference i = fn st =>
   let
     val gls =
-      prop_of st
+      Thm.prop_of st
       |> Logic.strip_horn
       |> fst
   in
@@ -1110,7 +1110,7 @@
     val rule = extuni_dec_n ctxt arity
 
     val rule_hyp =
-      prop_of rule
+      Thm.prop_of rule
       |> Logic.dest_implies
       |> fst (*assuming that rule has single hypothesis*)
 
@@ -1208,7 +1208,7 @@
 fun standard_cnf_type ctxt i : thm -> (TPTP_Reconstruct.formula_kind * int * bool) option = fn st =>
   let
     val gls =
-      prop_of st
+      Thm.prop_of st
       |> Logic.strip_horn
       |> fst
 
@@ -1681,7 +1681,7 @@
 fun clause_consts_diff thm =
   let
     val t =
-      prop_of thm
+      Thm.prop_of thm
       |> Logic.dest_implies
       |> fst
 
@@ -1707,7 +1707,7 @@
 fun remove_redundant_quantification ctxt i = fn st =>
   let
     val gls =
-      prop_of st
+      Thm.prop_of st
       |> Logic.strip_horn
       |> fst
   in
@@ -1763,7 +1763,7 @@
 fun remove_redundant_quantification_in_lit ctxt i = fn st =>
   let
     val gls =
-      prop_of st
+      Thm.prop_of st
       |> Logic.strip_horn
       |> fst
   in
@@ -2003,7 +2003,7 @@
      thy
      prob_name (#meta pannot) n
       |> the
-      |> (fn {inference_fmla, ...} => cterm_of thy inference_fmla)
+      |> (fn {inference_fmla, ...} => Thm.cterm_of thy inference_fmla)
       |> oracle_iinterp
   end
 *}
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/TPTP/atp_theory_export.ML
--- a/src/HOL/TPTP/atp_theory_export.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/TPTP/atp_theory_export.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -170,7 +170,7 @@
     val problem =
       facts
       |> map (fn ((_, loc), th) =>
-        ((Thm.get_name_hint th, loc), th |> prop_of |> mono ? monomorphize_term ctxt))
+        ((Thm.get_name_hint th, loc), th |> Thm.prop_of |> mono ? monomorphize_term ctxt))
       |> generate_atp_problem ctxt format Axiom type_enc Exporter combsN false false true []
         @{prop False}
       |> #1 |> sort_wrt (heading_sort_key o fst)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/TPTP/mash_export.ML
--- a/src/HOL/TPTP/mash_export.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/TPTP/mash_export.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
   | _ => ("", []))
 
 fun has_thm_thy th thy =
-  Context.theory_name thy = Context.theory_name (theory_of_thm th)
+  Context.theory_name thy = Context.theory_name (Thm.theory_of_thm th)
 
 fun has_thys thys th = exists (has_thm_thy th) thys
 
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
     fun do_fact ((_, stature), th) =
       let
         val name = nickname_of_thm th
-        val feats = features_of ctxt (theory_of_thm th) stature [prop_of th]
+        val feats = features_of ctxt (Thm.theory_of_thm th) stature [Thm.prop_of th]
         val s = encode_str name ^ ": " ^ encode_strs (sort string_ord feats) ^ "\n"
       in
         File.append path s
@@ -188,14 +188,14 @@
           val _ = tracing ("Fact " ^ string_of_int j ^ ": " ^ name)
           val isar_deps = isar_dependencies_of name_tabs th
           val do_query = not (is_bad_query ctxt ho_atp step j th isar_deps)
-          val goal_feats = features_of ctxt (theory_of_thm th) stature [prop_of th]
+          val goal_feats = features_of ctxt (Thm.theory_of_thm th) stature [Thm.prop_of th]
           val access_facts = filter_accessible_from th new_facts @ old_facts
           val (marker, deps) =
             smart_dependencies_of ctxt params_opt access_facts name_tabs th isar_deps
 
           fun extra_features_of (((_, stature), th), weight) =
-            [prop_of th]
-            |> features_of ctxt (theory_of_thm th) stature
+            [Thm.prop_of th]
+            |> features_of ctxt (Thm.theory_of_thm th) stature
             |> map (rpair (weight * extra_feature_factor))
 
           val query =
@@ -261,7 +261,7 @@
               val suggs =
                 old_facts
                 |> filter_accessible_from th
-                |> mepo_or_mash_suggested_facts ctxt (theory_of_thm th) params max_suggs hyp_ts
+                |> mepo_or_mash_suggested_facts ctxt (Thm.theory_of_thm th) params max_suggs hyp_ts
                   concl_t
                 |> map (nickname_of_thm o snd)
             in
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/ATP/atp_problem_generate.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/ATP/atp_problem_generate.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/ATP/atp_problem_generate.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -760,9 +760,9 @@
 fun do_introduce_combinators ctxt Ts t =
   let val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt in
     t |> conceal_bounds Ts
-      |> cterm_of thy
+      |> Thm.cterm_of thy
       |> Meson_Clausify.introduce_combinators_in_cterm
-      |> prop_of |> Logic.dest_equals |> snd
+      |> Thm.prop_of |> Logic.dest_equals |> snd
       |> reveal_bounds Ts
   end
   (* A type variable of sort "{}" will make abstraction fail. *)
@@ -1211,7 +1211,7 @@
   if exists_Const (member (op =) Meson.presimplified_consts o fst) t then
     t |> Skip_Proof.make_thm (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt)
       |> Meson.presimplify ctxt
-      |> prop_of
+      |> Thm.prop_of
   else
     t
 
@@ -1750,7 +1750,7 @@
                  I
                else
                  ths ~~ (1 upto length ths)
-                 |> maps (dub_and_inst needs_sound o apfst (apsnd prop_of))
+                 |> maps (dub_and_inst needs_sound o apfst (apsnd Thm.prop_of))
                  |> make_facts
                  |> union (op = o apply2 #iformula))
            (if completish then completish_helper_table else helper_table)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/ATP/atp_proof_reconstruct.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/ATP/atp_proof_reconstruct.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/ATP/atp_proof_reconstruct.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -580,7 +580,7 @@
       | uncomb (Abs (s, T, t)) = Abs (s, T, uncomb t)
       | uncomb (t as Const (x as (s, _))) =
         (case AList.lookup (op =) combinator_table s of
-          SOME thm => thm |> prop_of |> specialize_type thy x |> Logic.dest_equals |> snd
+          SOME thm => thm |> Thm.prop_of |> specialize_type thy x |> Logic.dest_equals |> snd
         | NONE => t)
       | uncomb t = t
   in uncomb end
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/ATP/atp_util.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/ATP/atp_util.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/ATP/atp_util.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -342,7 +342,7 @@
   if exists_Const (fn (s, _) => s = @{const_name Not}) t then
     t |> Skip_Proof.make_thm thy
       |> Meson.cong_extensionalize_thm thy
-      |> prop_of
+      |> Thm.prop_of
   else
     t
 
@@ -353,8 +353,8 @@
 fun abs_extensionalize_term ctxt t =
   if exists_Const is_fun_equality t then
     let val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt in
-      t |> cterm_of thy |> Meson.abs_extensionalize_conv ctxt
-        |> prop_of |> Logic.dest_equals |> snd
+      t |> Thm.cterm_of thy |> Meson.abs_extensionalize_conv ctxt
+        |> Thm.prop_of |> Logic.dest_equals |> snd
     end
   else
     t
@@ -405,7 +405,7 @@
 fun strip_subgoal goal i ctxt =
   let
     val (t, (frees, params)) =
-      Logic.goal_params (prop_of goal) i
+      Logic.goal_params (Thm.prop_of goal) i
       ||> (map dest_Free #> Variable.variant_frees ctxt [] #> `(map Free))
     val hyp_ts = t |> Logic.strip_assums_hyp |> map (curry subst_bounds frees)
     val concl_t = t |> Logic.strip_assums_concl |> curry subst_bounds frees
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/ATP/atp_waldmeister.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/ATP/atp_waldmeister.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/ATP/atp_waldmeister.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -516,7 +516,7 @@
       if helper_lemmas_needed then
         [(helpersN,
           @{thms waldmeister_fol}
-          |> map (fn th => (("", (Global, General)), preproc (prop_of th)))
+          |> map (fn th => (("", (Global, General)), preproc (Thm.prop_of th)))
           |> map (fn ((s, _) ,t) => mk_formula helper_prefix s Axiom (eq_trm_to_atp thy t)))]
       else
         []
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_fp_def_sugar.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_fp_def_sugar.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_fp_def_sugar.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@
 
 fun flip_rels lthy n thm =
   let
-    val Rs = Term.add_vars (prop_of thm) [];
+    val Rs = Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of thm) [];
     val Rs' = rev (drop (length Rs - n) Rs);
     val cRs = map (fn f => (Proof_Context.cterm_of lthy (Var f), Proof_Context.cterm_of lthy (mk_flip f))) Rs';
   in
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_fp_def_sugar_tactics.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_fp_def_sugar_tactics.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_fp_def_sugar_tactics.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
 
 fun co_induct_inst_as_projs ctxt k thm =
   let
-    val fs = Term.add_vars (prop_of thm) []
+    val fs = Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of thm) []
       |> filter (fn (_, Type (@{type_name fun}, [_, T'])) => T' <> HOLogic.boolT | _ => false);
     fun mk_cfp (f as (_, T)) =
       (Proof_Context.cterm_of ctxt (Var f), Proof_Context.cterm_of ctxt (mk_proj T (num_binder_types T) k));
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
 
 fun mk_case_transfer_tac ctxt rel_cases cases =
   let
-    val n = length (tl (prems_of rel_cases));
+    val n = length (tl (Thm.prems_of rel_cases));
   in
     REPEAT_DETERM (HEADGOAL (rtac rel_funI)) THEN
     HEADGOAL (etac rel_cases) THEN
@@ -512,7 +512,7 @@
     val assms_tac =
       let val assms' = map (unfold_thms ctxt (@{thm id_bnf_def} :: ctor_defs)) assms in
         fold (curry (op ORELSE')) (map (fn thm =>
-            funpow (length (prems_of thm)) (fn tac => tac THEN' atac) (rtac thm)) assms')
+            funpow (length (Thm.prems_of thm)) (fn tac => tac THEN' atac) (rtac thm)) assms')
           (etac FalseE)
       end;
     val exhausts' = map (fn thm => thm RS @{thm asm_rl[of "P x y" for P x y]}) exhausts
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_fp_util.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_fp_util.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_fp_util.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@
       val T = mk_tupleT_balanced tfrees;
     in
       @{thm asm_rl[of "ALL x. P x --> Q x" for P Q]}
-      |> Drule.instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of @{theory} T)] []
+      |> Drule.instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of @{theory} T)] []
       |> Raw_Simplifier.rewrite_goals_rule @{context} @{thms split_paired_All[THEN eq_reflection]}
       |> (fn thm => impI RS funpow n (fn th => allI RS th) thm)
       |> Thm.varifyT_global
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_gfp_rec_sugar.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_gfp_rec_sugar.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_gfp_rec_sugar.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -1343,7 +1343,7 @@
                   NONE => []
                 | SOME (exhaustive_code, rhs, raw_rhs, ctr_thms) =>
                   let
-                    val ms = map (Logic.count_prems o prop_of) ctr_thms;
+                    val ms = map (Logic.count_prems o Thm.prop_of) ctr_thms;
                     val (raw_goal, goal) = (raw_rhs, rhs)
                       |> apply2 (curry mk_Trueprop_eq (applied_fun_of fun_name fun_T fun_args)
                         #> curry Logic.list_all (map dest_Free fun_args));
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_gfp_rec_sugar_tactics.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_gfp_rec_sugar_tactics.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_gfp_rec_sugar_tactics.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -40,7 +40,7 @@
 fun exhaust_inst_as_projs ctxt frees thm =
   let
     val num_frees = length frees;
-    val fs = Term.add_vars (prop_of thm) [] |> filter (can dest_funT o snd);
+    val fs = Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of thm) [] |> filter (can dest_funT o snd);
     fun find s = find_index (curry (op =) s) frees;
     fun mk_cfp (f as ((s, _), T)) =
       (Proof_Context.cterm_of ctxt (Var f), Proof_Context.cterm_of ctxt (mk_proj T num_frees (find s)));
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@
   unfold_thms_tac ctxt (@{thm split_def} :: unfold_lets @ sel_funs) THEN HEADGOAL (rtac refl);
 
 fun inst_split_eq ctxt split =
-  (case prop_of split of
+  (case Thm.prop_of split of
     @{const Trueprop} $ (Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ (Var (_, Type (_, [T, _])) $ _) $ _) =>
     let
       val s = Name.uu;
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_lfp_size.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_lfp_size.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_lfp_size.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@
       val size_thmss = map2 append size_simpss overloaded_size_simpss;
       val size_gen_thmss = size_simpss
       fun rhs_is_zero thm =
-        let val Const (trueprop, _) $ (Const (eq, _) $ _ $ rhs) = prop_of thm in
+        let val Const (trueprop, _) $ (Const (eq, _) $ _ $ rhs) = Thm.prop_of thm in
           trueprop = @{const_name Trueprop} andalso
           eq = @{const_name HOL.eq} andalso
           rhs = HOLogic.zero
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_tactics.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_tactics.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/BNF/bnf_tactics.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
 (*stolen from Christian Urban's Cookbook (and adapted slightly)*)
 fun fo_rtac thm = Subgoal.FOCUS (fn {concl, ...} =>
   let
-    val concl_pat = Drule.strip_imp_concl (cprop_of thm)
+    val concl_pat = Drule.strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of thm)
     val insts = Thm.first_order_match (concl_pat, concl)
   in
     rtac (Drule.instantiate_normalize insts thm) 1
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Ctr_Sugar/ctr_sugar.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Ctr_Sugar/ctr_sugar.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Ctr_Sugar/ctr_sugar.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -795,7 +795,7 @@
               val sel_thmss = @{map 3} (map oo make_sel_thm) xss' case_thms sel_defss;
 
               fun has_undefined_rhs thm =
-                (case snd (HOLogic.dest_eq (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (prop_of thm))) of
+                (case snd (HOLogic.dest_eq (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.prop_of thm))) of
                   Const (@{const_name undefined}, _) => true
                 | _ => false);
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Ctr_Sugar/ctr_sugar_code.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Ctr_Sugar/ctr_sugar_code.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Ctr_Sugar/ctr_sugar_code.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -53,7 +53,7 @@
     fun true_eq tu = HOLogic.mk_eq (mk_fcT_eq tu, @{term True});
     fun false_eq tu = HOLogic.mk_eq (mk_fcT_eq tu, @{term False});
 
-    val monomorphic_prop_of = prop_of o Thm.unvarify_global o Drule.zero_var_indexes;
+    val monomorphic_prop_of = Thm.prop_of o Thm.unvarify_global o Drule.zero_var_indexes;
 
     fun massage_inject (tp $ (eqv $ (_ $ t $ u) $ rhs)) = tp $ (eqv $ mk_fcT_eq (t, u) $ rhs);
     fun massage_distinct (tp $ (_ $ (_ $ t $ u))) = [tp $ false_eq (t, u), tp $ false_eq (u, t)];
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Ctr_Sugar/ctr_sugar_util.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Ctr_Sugar/ctr_sugar_util.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Ctr_Sugar/ctr_sugar_util.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -178,7 +178,8 @@
 fun subst_nonatomic_types [] = I
   | subst_nonatomic_types inst = map_types (typ_subst_nonatomic inst);
 
-fun lhs_head_of thm = Term.head_of (fst (HOLogic.dest_eq (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (prop_of thm))));
+fun lhs_head_of thm =
+  Term.head_of (fst (HOLogic.dest_eq (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.prop_of thm))));
 
 fun mk_predT Ts = Ts ---> HOLogic.boolT;
 fun mk_pred1T T = mk_predT [T];
@@ -213,7 +214,7 @@
 fun cterm_instantiate_pos cts thm =
   let
     val cert = Thm.cterm_of (Thm.theory_of_thm thm);
-    val vars = Term.add_vars (prop_of thm) [];
+    val vars = Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of thm) [];
     val vars' = rev (drop (length vars - length cts) vars);
     val ps = map_filter (fn (_, NONE) => NONE
       | (var, SOME ct) => SOME (cert (Var var), ct)) (vars' ~~ cts);
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Function/fun_cases.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Function/fun_cases.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Function/fun_cases.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
     val info = Function.get_info ctxt f handle List.Empty => err ();
     val {elims, pelims, is_partial, ...} = info;
     val elims = if is_partial then pelims else the elims;
-    val cprop = cterm_of thy prop;
+    val cprop = Thm.cterm_of thy prop;
     fun mk_elim rl =
       Thm.implies_intr cprop
         (Tactic.rule_by_tactic ctxt (Inductive.mk_cases_tac ctxt) (Thm.assume cprop RS rl))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Function/function.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Function/function.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Function/function.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -166,7 +166,7 @@
       prepare_function do_print prep default_constraint fixspec eqns config lthy
   in
     lthy'
-    |> Proof.theorem NONE (snd oo afterqed) [[(Logic.unprotect (concl_of goal_state), [])]]
+    |> Proof.theorem NONE (snd oo afterqed) [[(Logic.unprotect (Thm.concl_of goal_state), [])]]
     |> Proof.refine (Method.primitive_text (K (K goal_state))) |> Seq.hd
   end
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Function/function_common.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Function/function_common.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Function/function_common.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -339,11 +339,11 @@
 fun import_function_data t ctxt =
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
-    val ct = cterm_of thy t
+    val ct = Thm.cterm_of thy t
     val inst_morph = lift_morphism thy o Thm.instantiate
 
     fun match (trm, data) =
-      SOME (transform_function_data data (inst_morph (Thm.match (cterm_of thy trm, ct))))
+      SOME (transform_function_data data (inst_morph (Thm.match (Thm.cterm_of thy trm, ct))))
       handle Pattern.MATCH => NONE
   in
     get_first match (Item_Net.retrieve (get_functions ctxt) t)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Function/function_context_tree.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Function/function_context_tree.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Function/function_context_tree.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
 
 fun cong_deps crule =
   let
-    val num_branches = map_index (apsnd branch_vars) (prems_of crule)
+    val num_branches = map_index (apsnd branch_vars) (Thm.prems_of crule)
   in
     Int_Graph.empty
     |> fold (fn (i,_)=> Int_Graph.new_node (i,i)) num_branches
@@ -114,13 +114,13 @@
         val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
 
         val tt' = Logic.mk_equals (Pattern.rewrite_term thy [(Free fvar, h)] [] t, t)
-        val (c, subs) = (concl_of r, prems_of r)
+        val (c, subs) = (Thm.concl_of r, Thm.prems_of r)
 
         val subst =
           Pattern.match (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt) (c, tt') (Vartab.empty, Vartab.empty)
         val branches = map (mk_branch ctxt o Envir.beta_norm o Envir.subst_term subst) subs
         val inst = map (fn v =>
-            (cterm_of thy (Var v), cterm_of thy (Envir.subst_term subst (Var v))))
+            (Thm.cterm_of thy (Var v), Thm.cterm_of thy (Envir.subst_term subst (Var v))))
           (Term.add_vars c [])
       in
          (cterm_instantiate inst r, dep, branches)
@@ -160,8 +160,8 @@
 
 fun inst_tree thy fvar f tr =
   let
-    val cfvar = cterm_of thy fvar
-    val cf = cterm_of thy f
+    val cfvar = Thm.cterm_of thy fvar
+    val cf = Thm.cterm_of thy f
 
     fun inst_term t =
       subst_bound(f, abstract_over (fvar, t))
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
       | inst_tree_aux (RCall (t, str)) =
         RCall (inst_term t, inst_tree_aux str)
     and inst_branch ((fxs, assms), str) =
-      ((fxs, map (Thm.assume o cterm_of thy o inst_term o prop_of) assms),
+      ((fxs, map (Thm.assume o Thm.cterm_of thy o inst_term o Thm.prop_of) assms),
        inst_tree_aux str)
   in
     inst_tree_aux tr
@@ -185,15 +185,15 @@
 fun compose (fs1, as1) (fs2, as2) = (fs1 @ fs2, as1 @ as2)
 
 fun export_term (fixes, assumes) =
- fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies o prop_of) assumes
+ fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies o Thm.prop_of) assumes
  #> fold_rev (Logic.all o Free) fixes
 
 fun export_thm thy (fixes, assumes) =
- fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o cprop_of) assumes
- #> fold_rev (Thm.forall_intr o cterm_of thy o Free) fixes
+ fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o Thm.cprop_of) assumes
+ #> fold_rev (Thm.forall_intr o Thm.cterm_of thy o Free) fixes
 
 fun import_thm thy (fixes, athms) =
- fold (Thm.forall_elim o cterm_of thy o Free) fixes
+ fold (Thm.forall_elim o Thm.cterm_of thy o Free) fixes
  #> fold Thm.elim_implies athms
 
 
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@
 fun rewrite_by_tree ctxt h ih x tr =
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
-    fun rewrite_help _ _ x (Leaf t) = (Thm.reflexive (cterm_of thy t), x)
+    fun rewrite_help _ _ x (Leaf t) = (Thm.reflexive (Thm.cterm_of thy t), x)
       | rewrite_help fix h_as x (RCall (_ $ arg, st)) =
         let
           val (inner, (lRi,ha)::x') = rewrite_help fix h_as x st (* "a' = a" *)
@@ -251,10 +251,10 @@
           val iha = import_thm thy (fix, h_as) ha (* (a', h a') : G *)
             |> Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.comb_conv (Conv.arg_conv (K inner))))
                                                     (* (a, h a) : G   *)
-          val inst_ih = instantiate' [] [SOME (cterm_of thy arg)] ih
+          val inst_ih = instantiate' [] [SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy arg)] ih
           val eq = Thm.implies_elim (Thm.implies_elim inst_ih lRi) iha (* h a = f a *)
 
-          val h_a'_eq_h_a = Thm.combination (Thm.reflexive (cterm_of thy h)) inner
+          val h_a'_eq_h_a = Thm.combination (Thm.reflexive (Thm.cterm_of thy h)) inner
           val h_a_eq_f_a = eq RS eq_reflection
           val result = Thm.transitive h_a'_eq_h_a h_a_eq_f_a
         in
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Function/function_core.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Function/function_core.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Function/function_core.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -152,10 +152,10 @@
     val lhs = inst pre_lhs
     val rhs = inst pre_rhs
 
-    val cqs = map (cterm_of thy) qs
-    val ags = map (Thm.assume o cterm_of thy) gs
+    val cqs = map (Thm.cterm_of thy) qs
+    val ags = map (Thm.assume o Thm.cterm_of thy) gs
 
-    val case_hyp = Thm.assume (cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (mk_eq (x, lhs))))
+    val case_hyp = Thm.assume (Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (mk_eq (x, lhs))))
   in
     ClauseContext { ctxt = ctxt', qs = qs, gs = gs, lhs = lhs, rhs = rhs,
       cqs = cqs, ags = ags, case_hyp = case_hyp }
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@
 
         val h_assum =
           HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (G $ rcarg $ (h $ rcarg))
-          |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies o prop_of) rcassm
+          |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies o Thm.prop_of) rcassm
           |> fold_rev (Logic.all o Free) rcfix
           |> Pattern.rewrite_term (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt) [(f, h)] []
           |> abstract_over_list (rev qs)
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@
     val ClauseContext {cqs=cqsi,ags=agsi,lhs=lhsi,...} = ctxi
     val ClauseContext {cqs=cqsj,ags=agsj,lhs=lhsj,...} = ctxj
 
-    val lhsi_eq_lhsj = cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (mk_eq (lhsi, lhsj)))
+    val lhsi_eq_lhsj = Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (mk_eq (lhsi, lhsj)))
   in if j < i then
     let
       val compat = lookup_compat_thm j i cts
@@ -274,15 +274,15 @@
 
     val Ris = map (fn RCInfo {llRI, ...} => llRI) RCs
     val h_assums = map (fn RCInfo {h_assum, ...} =>
-      Thm.assume (cterm_of thy (subst_bounds (rev qs, h_assum)))) RCs
+      Thm.assume (Thm.cterm_of thy (subst_bounds (rev qs, h_assum)))) RCs
 
     val (eql, _) =
       Function_Context_Tree.rewrite_by_tree ctxt h ih_elim_case (Ris ~~ h_assums) tree
 
     val replace_lemma = (eql RS meta_eq_to_obj_eq)
-      |> Thm.implies_intr (cprop_of case_hyp)
-      |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o cprop_of) h_assums
-      |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o cprop_of) ags
+      |> Thm.implies_intr (Thm.cprop_of case_hyp)
+      |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o Thm.cprop_of) h_assums
+      |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o Thm.cprop_of) ags
       |> fold_rev Thm.forall_intr cqs
       |> Thm.close_derivation
   in
@@ -293,7 +293,8 @@
 fun mk_uniqueness_clause thy globals compat_store clausei clausej RLj =
   let
     val Globals {h, y, x, fvar, ...} = globals
-    val ClauseInfo {no=i, cdata=cctxi as ClauseContext {ctxt=ctxti, lhs=lhsi, case_hyp, ...}, ...} = clausei
+    val ClauseInfo {no=i, cdata=cctxi as ClauseContext {ctxt=ctxti, lhs=lhsi, case_hyp, ...}, ...} =
+      clausei
     val ClauseInfo {no=j, qglr=cdescj, RCs=RCsj, ...} = clausej
 
     val cctxj as ClauseContext {ags = agsj', lhs = lhsj', rhs = rhsj', qs = qsj', cqs = cqsj', ...} =
@@ -301,15 +302,17 @@
 
     val rhsj'h = Pattern.rewrite_term thy [(fvar,h)] [] rhsj'
     val compat = get_compat_thm thy compat_store i j cctxi cctxj
-    val Ghsj' = map (fn RCInfo {h_assum, ...} => Thm.assume (cterm_of thy (subst_bounds (rev qsj', h_assum)))) RCsj
+    val Ghsj' =
+      map (fn RCInfo {h_assum, ...} =>
+        Thm.assume (Thm.cterm_of thy (subst_bounds (rev qsj', h_assum)))) RCsj
 
     val RLj_import = RLj
       |> fold Thm.forall_elim cqsj'
       |> fold Thm.elim_implies agsj'
       |> fold Thm.elim_implies Ghsj'
 
-    val y_eq_rhsj'h = Thm.assume (cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (mk_eq (y, rhsj'h))))
-    val lhsi_eq_lhsj' = Thm.assume (cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (mk_eq (lhsi, lhsj'))))
+    val y_eq_rhsj'h = Thm.assume (Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (mk_eq (y, rhsj'h))))
+    val lhsi_eq_lhsj' = Thm.assume (Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (mk_eq (lhsi, lhsj'))))
        (* lhs_i = lhs_j' |-- lhs_i = lhs_j' *)
   in
     (trans OF [case_hyp, lhsi_eq_lhsj']) (* lhs_i = lhs_j' |-- x = lhs_j' *)
@@ -319,12 +322,12 @@
       (* lhs_i = lhs_j', Gj', Rj1' ... Rjk' |-- rhs_j'_h = rhs_i_f *)
     |> (fn it => trans OF [y_eq_rhsj'h, it])
       (* lhs_i = lhs_j', Gj', Rj1' ... Rjk', y = rhs_j_h' |-- y = rhs_i_f *)
-    |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o cprop_of) Ghsj'
-    |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o cprop_of) agsj'
+    |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o Thm.cprop_of) Ghsj'
+    |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o Thm.cprop_of) agsj'
       (* lhs_i = lhs_j' , y = rhs_j_h' |-- Gj', Rj1'...Rjk' ==> y = rhs_i_f *)
-    |> Thm.implies_intr (cprop_of y_eq_rhsj'h)
-    |> Thm.implies_intr (cprop_of lhsi_eq_lhsj')
-    |> fold_rev Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy h :: cqsj')
+    |> Thm.implies_intr (Thm.cprop_of y_eq_rhsj'h)
+    |> Thm.implies_intr (Thm.cprop_of lhsi_eq_lhsj')
+    |> fold_rev Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy h :: cqsj')
   end
 
 
@@ -339,13 +342,13 @@
     val ih_intro_case = full_simplify (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt addsimps [case_hyp]) ih_intro
 
     fun prep_RC (RCInfo {llRI, RIvs, CCas, ...}) = (llRI RS ih_intro_case)
-      |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o cprop_of) CCas
-      |> fold_rev (Thm.forall_intr o cterm_of thy o Free) RIvs
+      |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o Thm.cprop_of) CCas
+      |> fold_rev (Thm.forall_intr o Thm.cterm_of thy o Free) RIvs
 
     val existence = fold (curry op COMP o prep_RC) RCs lGI
 
-    val P = cterm_of thy (mk_eq (y, rhsC))
-    val G_lhs_y = Thm.assume (cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (G $ lhs $ y)))
+    val P = Thm.cterm_of thy (mk_eq (y, rhsC))
+    val G_lhs_y = Thm.assume (Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (G $ lhs $ y)))
 
     val unique_clauses =
       map2 (mk_uniqueness_clause thy globals compat_store clausei) clauses rep_lemmas
@@ -356,31 +359,32 @@
       |> Seq.list_of |> the_single
 
     val uniqueness = G_cases
-      |> Thm.forall_elim (cterm_of thy lhs)
-      |> Thm.forall_elim (cterm_of thy y)
+      |> Thm.forall_elim (Thm.cterm_of thy lhs)
+      |> Thm.forall_elim (Thm.cterm_of thy y)
       |> Thm.forall_elim P
       |> Thm.elim_implies G_lhs_y
       |> fold elim_implies_eta unique_clauses
-      |> Thm.implies_intr (cprop_of G_lhs_y)
-      |> Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy y)
+      |> Thm.implies_intr (Thm.cprop_of G_lhs_y)
+      |> Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy y)
 
-    val P2 = cterm_of thy (lambda y (G $ lhs $ y)) (* P2 y := (lhs, y): G *)
+    val P2 = Thm.cterm_of thy (lambda y (G $ lhs $ y)) (* P2 y := (lhs, y): G *)
 
     val exactly_one =
-      @{thm ex1I} |> instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of thy ranT)] [SOME P2, SOME (cterm_of thy rhsC)]
+      @{thm ex1I}
+      |> instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of thy ranT)] [SOME P2, SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy rhsC)]
       |> curry (op COMP) existence
       |> curry (op COMP) uniqueness
       |> simplify (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt addsimps [case_hyp RS sym])
-      |> Thm.implies_intr (cprop_of case_hyp)
-      |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o cprop_of) ags
+      |> Thm.implies_intr (Thm.cprop_of case_hyp)
+      |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o Thm.cprop_of) ags
       |> fold_rev Thm.forall_intr cqs
 
     val function_value =
       existence
       |> Thm.implies_intr ihyp
-      |> Thm.implies_intr (cprop_of case_hyp)
-      |> Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy x)
-      |> Thm.forall_elim (cterm_of thy lhs)
+      |> Thm.implies_intr (Thm.cprop_of case_hyp)
+      |> Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy x)
+      |> Thm.forall_elim (Thm.cterm_of thy lhs)
       |> curry (op RS) refl
   in
     (exactly_one, function_value)
@@ -397,12 +401,12 @@
       Logic.mk_implies (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (R $ Bound 0 $ x),
         HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (Const (@{const_name Ex1}, (ranT --> boolT) --> boolT) $
           Abs ("y", ranT, G $ Bound 1 $ Bound 0))))
-      |> cterm_of thy
+      |> Thm.cterm_of thy
 
     val ihyp_thm = Thm.assume ihyp |> Thm.forall_elim_vars 0
     val ih_intro = ihyp_thm RS (f_def RS ex1_implies_ex)
     val ih_elim = ihyp_thm RS (f_def RS ex1_implies_un)
-      |> instantiate' [] [NONE, SOME (cterm_of thy h)]
+      |> instantiate' [] [NONE, SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy h)]
 
     val _ = trace_msg (K "Proving Replacement lemmas...")
     val repLemmas = map (mk_replacement_lemma ctxt h ih_elim) clauses
@@ -419,16 +423,17 @@
       |> Thm.forall_elim_vars 0
       |> fold (curry op COMP) ex1s
       |> Thm.implies_intr (ihyp)
-      |> Thm.implies_intr (cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (mk_acc domT R $ x)))
-      |> Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy x)
+      |> Thm.implies_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (mk_acc domT R $ x)))
+      |> Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy x)
       |> (fn it => Drule.compose (it, 2, acc_induct_rule)) (* "EX! y. (?x,y):G" *)
-      |> (fn it => fold (Thm.forall_intr o cterm_of thy o Var) (Term.add_vars (prop_of it) []) it)
+      |> (fn it =>
+          fold (Thm.forall_intr o Thm.cterm_of thy o Var) (Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of it) []) it)
 
     val goalstate =  Conjunction.intr graph_is_function complete
       |> Thm.close_derivation
       |> Goal.protect 0
-      |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o cprop_of) compat
-      |> Thm.implies_intr (cprop_of complete)
+      |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o Thm.cprop_of) compat
+      |> Thm.implies_intr (Thm.cprop_of complete)
   in
     (goalstate, values)
   end
@@ -458,7 +463,7 @@
       let
         val (qs, t) = dest_all_all orig_intro
         val frees = Variable.add_frees lthy t [] |> remove (op =) (Binding.name_of R, T)
-        val vars = Term.add_vars (prop_of thm) []
+        val vars = Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of thm) []
         val varmap = AList.lookup (op =) (frees ~~ map fst vars)
           #> the_default ("", 0)
       in
@@ -478,7 +483,7 @@
       let
         fun mk_h_assm (rcfix, rcassm, rcarg) =
           HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (Free Gvar $ rcarg $ (fvar $ rcarg))
-          |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies o prop_of) rcassm
+          |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies o Thm.prop_of) rcassm
           |> fold_rev (Logic.all o Free) rcfix
       in
         HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (Free Gvar $ lhs $ rhs)
@@ -511,7 +516,7 @@
 
     fun mk_RIntro (ClauseContext {qs, gs, lhs, ...}, (oqs, _, _, _)) (rcfix, rcassm, rcarg) =
       HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (Free Rvar $ rcarg $ lhs)
-      |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies o prop_of) rcassm
+      |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies o Thm.prop_of) rcassm
       |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies) gs
       |> fold_rev (Logic.all o Free) rcfix
       |> fold_rev mk_forall_rename (map fst oqs ~~ qs)
@@ -549,7 +554,7 @@
   let
     fun inst_term t = subst_bound(f, abstract_over (fvar, t))
   in
-    (rcfix, map (Thm.assume o cterm_of thy o inst_term o prop_of) rcassm, inst_term rcarg)
+    (rcfix, map (Thm.assume o Thm.cterm_of thy o inst_term o Thm.prop_of) rcassm, inst_term rcarg)
   end
 
 
@@ -563,19 +568,20 @@
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
     val Globals {domT, z, ...} = globals
 
-    fun mk_psimp (ClauseInfo {qglr = (oqs, _, _, _), cdata = ClauseContext {cqs, lhs, ags, ...}, ...}) valthm =
+    fun mk_psimp
+      (ClauseInfo {qglr = (oqs, _, _, _), cdata = ClauseContext {cqs, lhs, ags, ...}, ...}) valthm =
       let
-        val lhs_acc = cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (mk_acc domT R $ lhs)) (* "acc R lhs" *)
-        val z_smaller = cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (R $ z $ lhs)) (* "R z lhs" *)
+        val lhs_acc = Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (mk_acc domT R $ lhs)) (* "acc R lhs" *)
+        val z_smaller = Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (R $ z $ lhs)) (* "R z lhs" *)
       in
         ((Thm.assume z_smaller) RS ((Thm.assume lhs_acc) RS acc_downward))
         |> (fn it => it COMP graph_is_function)
         |> Thm.implies_intr z_smaller
-        |> Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy z)
+        |> Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy z)
         |> (fn it => it COMP valthm)
         |> Thm.implies_intr lhs_acc
         |> asm_simplify (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt addsimps [f_iff])
-        |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o cprop_of) ags
+        |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o Thm.cprop_of) ags
         |> fold_rev forall_intr_rename (map fst oqs ~~ cqs)
       end
   in
@@ -594,23 +600,23 @@
     val Globals {domT, x, z, a, P, D, ...} = globals
     val acc_R = mk_acc domT R
 
-    val x_D = Thm.assume (cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (D $ x)))
-    val a_D = cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (D $ a))
+    val x_D = Thm.assume (Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (D $ x)))
+    val a_D = Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (D $ a))
 
-    val D_subset = cterm_of thy (Logic.all x
+    val D_subset = Thm.cterm_of thy (Logic.all x
       (Logic.mk_implies (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (D $ x), HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (acc_R $ x))))
 
     val D_dcl = (* "!!x z. [| x: D; (z,x):R |] ==> z:D" *)
       Logic.all x (Logic.all z (Logic.mk_implies (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (D $ x),
         Logic.mk_implies (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (R $ z $ x),
           HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (D $ z)))))
-      |> cterm_of thy
+      |> Thm.cterm_of thy
 
     (* Inductive Hypothesis: !!z. (z,x):R ==> P z *)
     val ihyp = Logic.all_const domT $ Abs ("z", domT,
       Logic.mk_implies (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (R $ Bound 0 $ x),
         HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (P $ Bound 0)))
-      |> cterm_of thy
+      |> Thm.cterm_of thy
 
     val aihyp = Thm.assume ihyp
 
@@ -628,19 +634,19 @@
         end
 
         fun mk_Prec (RCInfo {llRI, RIvs, CCas, rcarg, ...}) = sih
-          |> Thm.forall_elim (cterm_of thy rcarg)
+          |> Thm.forall_elim (Thm.cterm_of thy rcarg)
           |> Thm.elim_implies llRI
-          |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o cprop_of) CCas
-          |> fold_rev (Thm.forall_intr o cterm_of thy o Free) RIvs
+          |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o Thm.cprop_of) CCas
+          |> fold_rev (Thm.forall_intr o Thm.cterm_of thy o Free) RIvs
 
         val P_recs = map mk_Prec RCs   (*  [P rec1, P rec2, ... ]  *)
 
         val step = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (P $ lhs)
-          |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies o prop_of) P_recs
+          |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies o Thm.prop_of) P_recs
           |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies) gs
           |> curry Logic.mk_implies (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (D $ lhs))
           |> fold_rev mk_forall_rename (map fst oqs ~~ qs)
-          |> cterm_of thy
+          |> Thm.cterm_of thy
 
         val P_lhs = Thm.assume step
           |> fold Thm.forall_elim cqs
@@ -648,12 +654,12 @@
           |> fold Thm.elim_implies ags
           |> fold Thm.elim_implies P_recs
 
-        val res = cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (P $ x))
+        val res = Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (P $ x))
           |> Conv.arg_conv (Conv.arg_conv case_hyp_conv)
           |> Thm.symmetric (* P lhs == P x *)
           |> (fn eql => Thm.equal_elim eql P_lhs) (* "P x" *)
-          |> Thm.implies_intr (cprop_of case_hyp)
-          |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o cprop_of) ags
+          |> Thm.implies_intr (Thm.cprop_of case_hyp)
+          |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o Thm.cprop_of) ags
           |> fold_rev Thm.forall_intr cqs
       in
         (res, step)
@@ -665,8 +671,8 @@
       |> Thm.forall_elim_vars 0
       |> fold (curry op COMP) cases (*  P x  *)
       |> Thm.implies_intr ihyp
-      |> Thm.implies_intr (cprop_of x_D)
-      |> Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy x)
+      |> Thm.implies_intr (Thm.cprop_of x_D)
+      |> Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy x)
 
     val subset_induct_rule =
       acc_subset_induct
@@ -681,16 +687,16 @@
 
     val simple_induct_rule =
       subset_induct_rule
-      |> Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy D)
-      |> Thm.forall_elim (cterm_of thy acc_R)
+      |> Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy D)
+      |> Thm.forall_elim (Thm.cterm_of thy acc_R)
       |> atac 1 |> Seq.hd
       |> (curry op COMP) (acc_downward
-        |> (instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of thy domT)]
-             (map (SOME o cterm_of thy) [R, x, z]))
-        |> Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy z)
-        |> Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy x))
-      |> Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy a)
-      |> Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy P)
+        |> (instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of thy domT)]
+             (map (SOME o Thm.cterm_of thy) [R, x, z]))
+        |> Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy z)
+        |> Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy x))
+      |> Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy a)
+      |> Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy P)
   in
     simple_induct_rule
   end
@@ -704,7 +710,7 @@
       qglr = (oqs, _, _, _), ...} = clause
     val goal = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (mk_acc domT R $ lhs)
       |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies) gs
-      |> cterm_of thy
+      |> Thm.cterm_of thy
   in
     Goal.init goal
     |> (SINGLE (resolve_tac ctxt [accI] 1)) |> the
@@ -737,11 +743,11 @@
           |> map (fn (ctxt, thm) => Function_Context_Tree.export_thm thy ctxt thm)
 
         val hyp = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (R' $ arg $ lhs)
-          |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies o prop_of) used (* additional hyps *)
+          |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies o Thm.prop_of) used (* additional hyps *)
           |> Function_Context_Tree.export_term (fixes, assumes)
-          |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies o prop_of) ags
+          |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies o Thm.prop_of) ags
           |> fold_rev mk_forall_rename (map fst oqs ~~ qs)
-          |> cterm_of thy
+          |> Thm.cterm_of thy
 
         val thm = Thm.assume hyp
           |> fold Thm.forall_elim cqs
@@ -750,7 +756,7 @@
           |> fold Thm.elim_implies used (*  "(arg, lhs) : R'"  *)
 
         val z_eq_arg = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (mk_eq (z, arg))
-          |> cterm_of thy |> Thm.assume
+          |> Thm.cterm_of thy |> Thm.assume
 
         val acc = thm COMP ih_case
         val z_acc_local = acc
@@ -786,42 +792,42 @@
 
     val wfR' = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (Const (@{const_name Wellfounded.wfP},
       (domT --> domT --> boolT) --> boolT) $ R')
-      |> cterm_of thy (* "wf R'" *)
+      |> Thm.cterm_of thy (* "wf R'" *)
 
     (* Inductive Hypothesis: !!z. (z,x):R' ==> z : acc R *)
     val ihyp = Logic.all_const domT $ Abs ("z", domT,
       Logic.mk_implies (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (R' $ Bound 0 $ x),
         HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (acc_R $ Bound 0)))
-      |> cterm_of thy
+      |> Thm.cterm_of thy
 
     val ihyp_a = Thm.assume ihyp |> Thm.forall_elim_vars 0
 
-    val R_z_x = cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (R $ z $ x))
+    val R_z_x = Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (R $ z $ x))
 
     val (hyps, cases) = fold (mk_nest_term_case ctxt globals R' ihyp_a) clauses ([], [])
   in
     R_cases
-    |> Thm.forall_elim (cterm_of thy z)
-    |> Thm.forall_elim (cterm_of thy x)
-    |> Thm.forall_elim (cterm_of thy (acc_R $ z))
+    |> Thm.forall_elim (Thm.cterm_of thy z)
+    |> Thm.forall_elim (Thm.cterm_of thy x)
+    |> Thm.forall_elim (Thm.cterm_of thy (acc_R $ z))
     |> curry op COMP (Thm.assume R_z_x)
     |> fold_rev (curry op COMP) cases
     |> Thm.implies_intr R_z_x
-    |> Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy z)
+    |> Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy z)
     |> (fn it => it COMP accI)
     |> Thm.implies_intr ihyp
-    |> Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy x)
+    |> Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy x)
     |> (fn it => Drule.compose (it, 2, wf_induct_rule))
     |> curry op RS (Thm.assume wfR')
     |> forall_intr_vars
     |> (fn it => it COMP allI)
     |> fold Thm.implies_intr hyps
     |> Thm.implies_intr wfR'
-    |> Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy R')
-    |> Thm.forall_elim (cterm_of thy (inrel_R))
+    |> Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy R')
+    |> Thm.forall_elim (Thm.cterm_of thy (inrel_R))
     |> curry op RS wf_in_rel
     |> full_simplify (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt addsimps [in_rel_def])
-    |> Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy Rrel)
+    |> Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy Rrel)
   end
 
 
@@ -892,7 +898,7 @@
 
     fun mk_partial_rules provedgoal =
       let
-        val newthy = theory_of_thm provedgoal (*FIXME*)
+        val newthy = Thm.theory_of_thm provedgoal (*FIXME*)
         val newctxt = Proof_Context.init_global newthy (*FIXME*)
 
         val (graph_is_function, complete_thm) =
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Function/function_elims.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Function/function_elims.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Function/function_elims.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
           if Logic.occs (Free x, t) then raise Match else false
       | _ => raise Match);
     fun mk_eq thm =
-      (if inspect (prop_of thm) then [thm RS eq_reflection]
+      (if inspect (Thm.prop_of thm) then [thm RS eq_reflection]
        else [Thm.symmetric (thm RS eq_reflection)])
       handle Match => [];
     val simpset =
@@ -80,7 +80,7 @@
 fun mk_partial_elim_rules ctxt result =
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt;
-    val cert = cterm_of thy;
+    val cert = Thm.cterm_of thy;
 
     val FunctionResult {fs, R, dom, psimps, cases, ...} = result;
     val n_fs = length fs;
@@ -98,14 +98,14 @@
 
         val f_simps =
           filter (fn r =>
-            (prop_of r |> Logic.strip_assums_concl
+            (Thm.prop_of r |> Logic.strip_assums_concl
               |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop
               |> dest_funprop |> fst |> fst) = f)
             psimps;
 
         val arity =
           hd f_simps
-          |> prop_of
+          |> Thm.prop_of
           |> Logic.strip_assums_concl
           |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop
           |> snd o fst o dest_funprop
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Function/function_lib.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Function/function_lib.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Function/function_lib.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -62,7 +62,7 @@
 fun forall_intr_rename (n, cv) thm =
   let
     val allthm = Thm.forall_intr cv thm
-    val (_ $ abs) = prop_of allthm
+    val (_ $ abs) = Thm.prop_of allthm
   in Thm.rename_boundvars abs (Abs (n, dummyT, Term.dummy)) allthm end
 
 
@@ -95,17 +95,17 @@
 
 fun regroup_conv neu cn ac is ct =
  let
-   val thy = theory_of_cterm ct
+   val thy = Thm.theory_of_cterm ct
    val ctxt = Proof_Context.init_global thy  (* FIXME proper context!? *)
 
    val mk = HOLogic.mk_binop cn
-   val t = term_of ct
+   val t = Thm.term_of ct
    val xs = dest_binop_list cn t
    val js = subtract (op =) is (0 upto (length xs) - 1)
    val ty = fastype_of t
  in
    Goal.prove_internal ctxt []
-     (cterm_of thy
+     (Thm.cterm_of thy
        (Logic.mk_equals (t,
           if null is
           then mk (Const (neu, ty), foldr1 mk (map (nth xs) js))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Function/induction_schema.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Function/induction_schema.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Function/induction_schema.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -46,8 +46,8 @@
   (map meta (@{thm split_conv} :: @{thms sum.case}))
 
 fun term_conv thy cv t =
-  cv (cterm_of thy t)
-  |> prop_of |> Logic.dest_equals |> snd
+  cv (Thm.cterm_of thy t)
+  |> Thm.prop_of |> Logic.dest_equals |> snd
 
 fun mk_relT T = HOLogic.mk_setT (HOLogic.mk_prodT (T, T))
 
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
   (IndScheme {T, cases=scases, branches}) =
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
-    val cert = cterm_of thy
+    val cert = Thm.cterm_of thy
 
     val n = length branches
     val scases_idx = map_index I scases
@@ -274,14 +274,14 @@
                 |> Conv.fconv_rule (sum_prod_conv ctxt)
                 |> Conv.fconv_rule (ind_rulify ctxt)
                 |> (fn th => th COMP ipres) (* P rs *)
-                |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o cprop_of) cGas
+                |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o Thm.cprop_of) cGas
                 |> fold_rev Thm.forall_intr cGvs
               end
 
             val P_recs = map2 mk_Prec rs ineq_press   (*  [P rec1, P rec2, ... ]  *)
 
             val step = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (list_comb (P, lhs))
-              |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies o prop_of) P_recs
+              |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies o Thm.prop_of) P_recs
               |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies) gs
               |> fold_rev (Logic.all o Free) qs
               |> cert
@@ -295,7 +295,7 @@
               |> fold Thm.elim_implies ags
               |> fold Thm.elim_implies P_recs (* P lhs *)
               |> Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv Plhs_to_Pxs_conv) (* P xs *)
-              |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o cprop_of) (ags @ case_hyps)
+              |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o Thm.cprop_of) (ags @ case_hyps)
               |> fold_rev Thm.forall_intr cqs (* !!qs. Gas ==> xs = lhss ==> P xs *)
           in
             (res, (cidx, step))
@@ -308,7 +308,7 @@
           |> fold (Thm.forall_elim o cert) (fxs @ map Free ws)
           |> fold Thm.elim_implies C_hyps
           |> fold Thm.elim_implies cases (* P xs *)
-          |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o cprop_of) C_hyps
+          |> fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o Thm.cprop_of) C_hyps
           |> fold_rev (Thm.forall_intr o cert o Free) ws
 
         val Pxs = cert (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (P_comp $ x))
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@
           |> Seq.hd
           |> Thm.elim_implies (Conv.fconv_rule Drule.beta_eta_conversion bstep)
           |> Goal.finish ctxt
-          |> Thm.implies_intr (cprop_of branch_hyp)
+          |> Thm.implies_intr (Thm.cprop_of branch_hyp)
           |> fold_rev (Thm.forall_intr o cert) fxs
       in
         (Pxs, steps)
@@ -380,7 +380,7 @@
       end
 
     val res = Conjunction.intr_balanced (map_index project branches)
-      |> fold_rev Thm.implies_intr (map cprop_of newgoals @ steps)
+      |> fold_rev Thm.implies_intr (map Thm.cprop_of newgoals @ steps)
       |> Drule.generalize ([], [Rn])
 
     val nbranches = length branches
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Function/lexicographic_order.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Function/lexicographic_order.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Function/lexicographic_order.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
 
 fun mk_cell thy solve_tac (vars, prems, lhs, rhs) mfun = Lazy.lazy (fn _ =>
   let
-    val goals = cterm_of thy o mk_goal (vars, prems, mfun $ lhs, mfun $ rhs)
+    val goals = Thm.cterm_of thy o mk_goal (vars, prems, mfun $ lhs, mfun $ rhs)
   in
     case try_proof (goals @{const_name Orderings.less}) solve_tac of
       Solved thm => Less thm
@@ -76,7 +76,7 @@
       (case try_proof (goals @{const_name Orderings.less_eq}) solve_tac of
          Solved thm2 => LessEq (thm2, thm)
        | Stuck thm2 =>
-         if prems_of thm2 = [HOLogic.Trueprop $ @{term False}] then False thm2
+         if Thm.prems_of thm2 = [HOLogic.Trueprop $ @{term False}] then False thm2
          else None (thm2, thm)
        | _ => raise Match) (* FIXME *)
     | _ => raise Match
@@ -176,7 +176,7 @@
 fun lex_order_tac quiet ctxt solve_tac st = SUBGOAL (fn _ =>
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
-    val ((_ $ (_ $ rel)) :: tl) = prems_of st
+    val ((_ $ (_ $ rel)) :: tl) = Thm.prems_of st
 
     val (domT, _) = HOLogic.dest_prodT (HOLogic.dest_setT (fastype_of rel))
 
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@
             else ()
   
         in (* 4: proof reconstruction *)
-          st |> (PRIMITIVE (cterm_instantiate [(cterm_of thy rel, cterm_of thy relation)])
+          st |> (PRIMITIVE (cterm_instantiate [(Thm.cterm_of thy rel, Thm.cterm_of thy relation)])
           THEN (REPEAT (rtac @{thm "wf_mlex"} 1))
           THEN (rtac @{thm "wf_empty"} 1)
           THEN EVERY (map prove_row clean_table))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Function/measure_functions.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Function/measure_functions.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Function/measure_functions.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
   DEPTH_SOLVE (resolve_tac ctxt (rev (Named_Theorems.get ctxt @{named_theorems measure_function})) 1)
     (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (mk_is_measure (Var (("f",0), T --> HOLogic.natT)))
      |> Proof_Context.cterm_of ctxt |> Goal.init)
-  |> Seq.map (prop_of #> (fn _ $ (_ $ (_ $ f)) => f))
+  |> Seq.map (Thm.prop_of #> (fn _ $ (_ $ (_ $ f)) => f))
   |> Seq.list_of
 
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Function/mutual.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Function/mutual.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Function/mutual.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -160,13 +160,13 @@
     val args = map inst pre_args
     val rhs = inst pre_rhs
 
-    val cqs = map (cterm_of thy) qs
-    val ags = map (Thm.assume o cterm_of thy) gs
+    val cqs = map (Thm.cterm_of thy) qs
+    val ags = map (Thm.assume o Thm.cterm_of thy) gs
 
     val import = fold Thm.forall_elim cqs
       #> fold Thm.elim_implies ags
 
-    val export = fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o cprop_of) ags
+    val export = fold_rev (Thm.implies_intr o Thm.cprop_of) ags
       #> fold_rev forall_intr_rename (oqnames ~~ cqs)
   in
     F ctxt (f, qs, gs, args, rhs) import export
@@ -199,7 +199,9 @@
 fun mk_applied_form ctxt caTs thm =
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
-    val xs = map_index (fn (i,T) => cterm_of thy (Free ("x" ^ string_of_int i, T))) caTs (* FIXME: Bind xs properly *)
+    val xs =
+      map_index (fn (i, T) =>
+        Thm.cterm_of thy (Free ("x" ^ string_of_int i, T))) caTs (* FIXME: Bind xs properly *)
   in
     fold (fn x => fn thm => Thm.combination thm (Thm.reflexive x)) xs thm
     |> Conv.fconv_rule (Thm.beta_conversion true)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Function/partial_function.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Function/partial_function.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Function/partial_function.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -69,7 +69,7 @@
          NONE => NONE
        | SOME {case_thms, ...} =>
            let
-             val lhs = prop_of (hd case_thms)
+             val lhs = Thm.prop_of (hd case_thms)
                |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> HOLogic.dest_eq |> fst;
              val arity = length (snd (strip_comb lhs));
              val conv = funpow (length args - arity) Conv.fun_conv
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
 fun cterm_instantiate' cts thm =
   let
     val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm thm;
-    val vs = rev (Term.add_vars (prop_of thm) [])
+    val vs = rev (Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of thm) [])
       |> map (Thm.cterm_of thy o Var);
   in
     cterm_instantiate (zip_options vs cts) thm
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Function/pat_completeness.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Function/pat_completeness.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Function/pat_completeness.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -24,9 +24,9 @@
 fun inst_free var inst = Thm.forall_elim inst o Thm.forall_intr var
 
 fun inst_case_thm thy x P thm =
-  let val [Pv, xv] = Term.add_vars (prop_of thm) []
+  let val [Pv, xv] = Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of thm) []
   in
-    thm |> cterm_instantiate (map (apply2 (cterm_of thy)) [(Var xv, x), (Var Pv, P)])
+    thm |> cterm_instantiate (map (apply2 (Thm.cterm_of thy)) [(Var xv, x), (Var Pv, P)])
   end
 
 fun invent_vars constr i =
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
   | filter_pats thy cons pvars (([], thm) :: pts) = raise Match
   | filter_pats thy cons pvars (((pat as Free _) :: pats, thm) :: pts) =
     let val inst = list_comb (cons, pvars)
-    in (inst :: pats, inst_free (cterm_of thy pat) (cterm_of thy inst) thm)
+    in (inst :: pats, inst_free (Thm.cterm_of thy pat) (Thm.cterm_of thy inst) thm)
        :: (filter_pats thy cons pvars pts)
     end
   | filter_pats thy cons pvars ((pat :: pats, thm) :: pts) =
@@ -58,7 +58,7 @@
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
     val (_, subps) = strip_comb pat
-    val eqs = map (cterm_of thy o HOLogic.mk_Trueprop o HOLogic.mk_eq) (avars ~~ subps)
+    val eqs = map (Thm.cterm_of thy o HOLogic.mk_Trueprop o HOLogic.mk_eq) (avars ~~ subps)
     val c_eq_pat = simplify (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt addsimps (map Thm.assume eqs)) c_assum
   in
     (subps @ pats,
@@ -72,13 +72,13 @@
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
     val (avars, pvars, newidx) = invent_vars cons idx
-    val c_hyp = cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (HOLogic.mk_eq (v, list_comb (cons, avars))))
+    val c_hyp = Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (HOLogic.mk_eq (v, list_comb (cons, avars))))
     val c_assum = Thm.assume c_hyp
     val newpats = map (transform_pat ctxt avars c_assum) (filter_pats thy cons pvars pats)
   in
     o_alg ctxt P newidx (avars @ vs) newpats
     |> Thm.implies_intr c_hyp
-    |> fold_rev (Thm.forall_intr o cterm_of thy) avars
+    |> fold_rev (Thm.forall_intr o Thm.cterm_of thy) avars
   end
   | constr_case _ _ _ _ _ _ = raise Match
 and o_alg _ P idx [] (([], Pthm) :: _)  = Pthm
@@ -110,10 +110,10 @@
       HOLogic.mk_Trueprop P
       |> fold_rev (curry Logic.mk_implies o HOLogic.mk_Trueprop o HOLogic.mk_eq) (xs ~~ pats)
       |> fold_rev Logic.all qs
-      |> cterm_of thy
+      |> Thm.cterm_of thy
 
     val hyps = map2 mk_assum qss patss
-    fun inst_hyps hyp qs = fold (Thm.forall_elim o cterm_of thy) qs (Thm.assume hyp)
+    fun inst_hyps hyp qs = fold (Thm.forall_elim o Thm.cterm_of thy) qs (Thm.assume hyp)
     val assums = map2 inst_hyps hyps qss
     in
       o_alg ctxt P 2 xs (patss ~~ assums)
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
 
     val patss = map (map snd) x_pats
     val complete_thm = prove_completeness ctxt xs thesis qss patss
-      |> fold_rev (Thm.forall_intr o cterm_of thy) vs
+      |> fold_rev (Thm.forall_intr o Thm.cterm_of thy) vs
     in
       PRIMITIVE (fn st => Drule.compose (complete_thm, i, st))
   end
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Function/relation.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Function/relation.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Function/relation.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -16,11 +16,11 @@
 (* tactic version *)
 
 fun inst_state_tac inst st =
-  case Term.add_vars (prop_of st) [] of
+  (case Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of st) [] of
     [v as (_, T)] =>
       let val cert = Thm.cterm_of (Thm.theory_of_thm st);
       in PRIMITIVE (Thm.instantiate ([], [(cert (Var v), cert (inst T))])) st end
-  | _ => Seq.empty;
+  | _ => Seq.empty);
 
 fun relation_tac ctxt rel i =
   TRY (Function_Common.termination_rule_tac ctxt i)
@@ -30,7 +30,7 @@
 (* version with type inference *)
 
 fun inst_state_infer_tac ctxt rel st =
-  case Term.add_vars (prop_of st) [] of
+  (case Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of st) [] of
     [v as (_, T)] =>
       let
         val cert = Proof_Context.cterm_of ctxt;
@@ -42,7 +42,7 @@
       in
         PRIMITIVE (Thm.instantiate ([], [(cert (Var v), rel')])) st
       end
-  | _ => Seq.empty;
+  | _ => Seq.empty);
 
 fun relation_infer_tac ctxt rel i =
   TRY (Function_Common.termination_rule_tac ctxt i)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Function/scnp_reconstruct.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Function/scnp_reconstruct.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Function/scnp_reconstruct.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -158,7 +158,7 @@
       (case Termination.get_descent D (nth cs cidx) m1 m2 of
         SOME (Termination.Less thm) =>
           if bStrict then thm
-          else (thm COMP (Thm.lift_rule (cprop_of thm) @{thm less_imp_le}))
+          else (thm COMP (Thm.lift_rule (Thm.cprop_of thm) @{thm less_imp_le}))
       | SOME (Termination.LessEq (thm, _))  =>
           if not bStrict then thm
           else raise Fail "get_desc_thm"
@@ -272,7 +272,7 @@
     val level_mapping =
       map_index pt_lev lev
         |> Termination.mk_sumcases D (setT nat_pairT)
-        |> cterm_of thy
+        |> Thm.cterm_of thy
     in
       PROFILE "Proof Reconstruction"
         (CONVERSION (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.arg_conv (Function_Lib.regroup_union_conv sl))) 1
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Function/termination.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Function/termination.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Function/termination.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
         Const (@{const_abbrev Set.empty}, fastype_of c1))
       |> HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (* "C1 O C2 = {}" *)
   in
-    case Function_Lib.try_proof (cterm_of thy goal) chain_tac of
+    case Function_Lib.try_proof (Thm.cterm_of thy goal) chain_tac of
       Function_Lib.Solved thm => SOME thm
     | _ => NONE
   end
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@
 fun mk_desc thy tac vs Gam l r m1 m2 =
   let
     fun try rel =
-      try_proof (cterm_of thy
+      try_proof (Thm.cterm_of thy
         (Logic.list_all (vs,
            Logic.mk_implies (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop Gam,
              HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (Const (rel, @{typ "nat => nat => bool"})
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@
        (case try @{const_name Orderings.less_eq} of
           Solved thm2 => LessEq (thm2, thm)
         | Stuck thm2 =>
-          if prems_of thm2 = [HOLogic.Trueprop $ @{term False}]
+          if Thm.prems_of thm2 = [HOLogic.Trueprop $ @{term False}]
           then False thm2 else None (thm2, thm)
         | _ => raise Match) (* FIXME *)
      | _ => raise Match
@@ -275,8 +275,8 @@
 fun wf_union_tac ctxt st = SUBGOAL (fn _ =>
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
-    val cert = cterm_of thy
-    val ((_ $ (_ $ rel)) :: ineqs) = prems_of st
+    val cert = Thm.cterm_of thy
+    val ((_ $ (_ $ rel)) :: ineqs) = Thm.prems_of st
 
     fun mk_compr ineq =
       let
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_bnf.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_bnf.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_bnf.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
 fun Quotient_tac bnf ctxt i =
   let
     val rel_Grp = rel_Grp_of_bnf bnf
-    fun get_lhs thm = thm |> concl_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> HOLogic.dest_eq |> fst
+    fun get_lhs thm = thm |> Thm.concl_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> HOLogic.dest_eq |> fst
     val vars = get_lhs rel_Grp |> strip_comb |> snd |> map_filter (try (strip_comb #> snd #> hd))
     val UNIVs = map (fn var => HOLogic.mk_UNIV (var |> dest_Var |> snd |> dest_Type |> snd |> hd)) vars
     val inst = map2 (curry (apply2 (Proof_Context.cterm_of ctxt))) vars UNIVs
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_def.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_def.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_def.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -57,12 +57,12 @@
 fun try_prove_reflexivity ctxt prop =
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
-    val cprop = cterm_of thy prop
+    val cprop = Thm.cterm_of thy prop
     val rule = @{thm ge_eq_refl}
-    val concl_pat = Drule.strip_imp_concl (cprop_of rule)
+    val concl_pat = Drule.strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of rule)
     val insts = Thm.first_order_match (concl_pat, cprop)
     val rule = Drule.instantiate_normalize insts rule
-    val prop = hd (prems_of rule)
+    val prop = hd (Thm.prems_of rule)
   in
     case mono_eq_prover ctxt prop of
       SOME thm => SOME (thm RS rule)
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
   let
     fun preprocess ctxt thm =
       let
-        val tm = (strip_args 2 o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o concl_of) thm;
+        val tm = (strip_args 2 o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.concl_of) thm;
         val param_rel = (snd o dest_comb o fst o dest_comb) tm;
         val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt;
         val free_vars = Term.add_vars param_rel [];
@@ -99,25 +99,26 @@
           end;
         
         val subst = fold make_subst free_vars [];
-        val csubst = map (apply2 (cterm_of thy)) subst;
+        val csubst = map (apply2 (Thm.cterm_of thy)) subst;
         val inst_thm = Drule.cterm_instantiate csubst thm;
       in
         Conv.fconv_rule 
-          ((Conv.concl_conv (nprems_of inst_thm) o HOLogic.Trueprop_conv o Conv.fun2_conv o Conv.arg1_conv)
+          ((Conv.concl_conv (Thm.nprems_of inst_thm) o
+            HOLogic.Trueprop_conv o Conv.fun2_conv o Conv.arg1_conv)
             (Raw_Simplifier.rewrite ctxt false (Transfer.get_sym_relator_eq ctxt))) inst_thm
       end
 
     fun inst_relcomppI thy ant1 ant2 =
       let
-        val t1 = (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o concl_of) ant1
-        val t2 = (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) ant2
-        val fun1 = cterm_of thy (strip_args 2 t1)
-        val args1 = map (cterm_of thy) (get_args 2 t1)
-        val fun2 = cterm_of thy (strip_args 2 t2)
-        val args2 = map (cterm_of thy) (get_args 1 t2)
+        val t1 = (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.concl_of) ant1
+        val t2 = (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) ant2
+        val fun1 = Thm.cterm_of thy (strip_args 2 t1)
+        val args1 = map (Thm.cterm_of thy) (get_args 2 t1)
+        val fun2 = Thm.cterm_of thy (strip_args 2 t2)
+        val args2 = map (Thm.cterm_of thy) (get_args 1 t2)
         val relcomppI = Drule.incr_indexes2 ant1 ant2 @{thm relcomppI}
-        val vars = (rev (Term.add_vars (prop_of relcomppI) []))
-        val subst = map (apfst ((cterm_of thy) o Var)) (vars ~~ ([fun1] @ args1 @ [fun2] @ args2))
+        val vars = (rev (Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of relcomppI) []))
+        val subst = map (apfst (Thm.cterm_of thy o Var)) (vars ~~ ([fun1] @ args1 @ [fun2] @ args2))
       in
         Drule.cterm_instantiate subst relcomppI
       end
@@ -126,11 +127,12 @@
       let
         val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
         fun mk_POS ty = Const (@{const_name POS}, ty --> ty --> HOLogic.boolT)
-        val rel = (Thm.dest_fun2 o Thm.dest_arg o cprop_of) thm
-        val typ = (typ_of o ctyp_of_term) rel
-        val POS_const = cterm_of thy (mk_POS typ)
-        val var = cterm_of thy (Var (("X", #maxidx (rep_cterm (rel)) + 1), typ))
-        val goal = Thm.apply (cterm_of thy HOLogic.Trueprop) (Thm.apply (Thm.apply POS_const rel) var)
+        val rel = (Thm.dest_fun2 o Thm.dest_arg o Thm.cprop_of) thm
+        val typ = (Thm.typ_of o Thm.ctyp_of_term) rel
+        val POS_const = Thm.cterm_of thy (mk_POS typ)
+        val var = Thm.cterm_of thy (Var (("X", #maxidx (Thm.rep_cterm (rel)) + 1), typ))
+        val goal =
+          Thm.apply (Thm.cterm_of thy HOLogic.Trueprop) (Thm.apply (Thm.apply POS_const rel) var)
       in
         [Lifting_Term.merge_transfer_relations ctxt goal, thm] MRSL @{thm POS_apply}
       end
@@ -208,13 +210,13 @@
 
 fun unabs_def ctxt def = 
   let
-    val (_, rhs) = Thm.dest_equals (cprop_of def)
+    val (_, rhs) = Thm.dest_equals (Thm.cprop_of def)
     fun dest_abs (Abs (var_name, T, _)) = (var_name, T)
       | dest_abs tm = raise TERM("get_abs_var",[tm])
-    val (var_name, T) = dest_abs (term_of rhs)
+    val (var_name, T) = dest_abs (Thm.term_of rhs)
     val (new_var_names, ctxt') = Variable.variant_fixes [var_name] ctxt
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt'
-    val refl_thm = Thm.reflexive (cterm_of thy (Free (hd new_var_names, T)))
+    val refl_thm = Thm.reflexive (Thm.cterm_of thy (Free (hd new_var_names, T)))
   in
     Thm.combination def refl_thm |>
     singleton (Proof_Context.export ctxt' ctxt)
@@ -222,8 +224,8 @@
 
 fun unabs_all_def ctxt def = 
   let
-    val (_, rhs) = Thm.dest_equals (cprop_of def)
-    val xs = strip_abs_vars (term_of rhs)
+    val (_, rhs) = Thm.dest_equals (Thm.cprop_of def)
+    val xs = strip_abs_vars (Thm.term_of rhs)
   in  
     fold (K (unabs_def ctxt)) xs def
   end
@@ -295,11 +297,11 @@
         val rel_fun = prove_rel ctxt rsp_thm (rty, qty)
         val rep_abs_thm = [quot_thm, rel_fun] MRSL @{thm Quotient_rep_abs_eq}
       in
-        case mono_eq_prover ctxt (hd(prems_of rep_abs_thm)) of
+        case mono_eq_prover ctxt (hd (Thm.prems_of rep_abs_thm)) of
           SOME mono_eq_thm =>
             let
               val rep_abs_eq = mono_eq_thm RS rep_abs_thm
-              val rep = (cterm_of thy o quot_thm_rep) quot_thm
+              val rep = (Thm.cterm_of thy o quot_thm_rep) quot_thm
               val rep_refl = Thm.reflexive rep RS @{thm meta_eq_to_obj_eq}
               val repped_eq = [rep_refl, unabs_def RS @{thm meta_eq_to_obj_eq}] MRSL @{thm cong}
               val code_cert = [repped_eq, rep_abs_eq] MRSL trans
@@ -323,11 +325,11 @@
         val rep_abs_folded_unmapped_thm = 
           let
             val rep_id = [quot_thm, def_thm] MRSL @{thm Quotient_Rep_eq}
-            val ctm = Thm.dest_equals_lhs (cprop_of rep_id)
+            val ctm = Thm.dest_equals_lhs (Thm.cprop_of rep_id)
             val unfolded_maps_eq = unfold_fun_maps ctm
             val t1 = [quot_thm, def_thm, rsp_thm] MRSL @{thm Quotient_rep_abs_fold_unmap}
             val prems_pat = (hd o Drule.cprems_of) t1
-            val insts = Thm.first_order_match (prems_pat, cprop_of unfolded_maps_eq)
+            val insts = Thm.first_order_match (prems_pat, Thm.cprop_of unfolded_maps_eq)
           in
             unfolded_maps_eq RS (Drule.instantiate_normalize insts t1)
           end
@@ -354,7 +356,7 @@
       | no_abstr (Const (name, _)) = not (Code.is_abstr thy name)
       | no_abstr _ = true
     fun is_valid_eq eqn = can (Code.assert_eqn thy) (mk_meta_eq eqn, true) 
-      andalso no_abstr (prop_of eqn)
+      andalso no_abstr (Thm.prop_of eqn)
     fun is_valid_abs_eq abs_eq = can (Code.assert_abs_eqn thy NONE) (mk_meta_eq abs_eq)
 
   in
@@ -378,7 +380,7 @@
 local
   fun encode_code_eq thy abs_eq opt_rep_eq (rty, qty) = 
     let
-      fun mk_type typ = typ |> Logic.mk_type |> cterm_of thy |> Drule.mk_term
+      fun mk_type typ = typ |> Logic.mk_type |> Thm.cterm_of thy |> Drule.mk_term
     in
       Conjunction.intr_balanced [abs_eq, (the_default TrueI opt_rep_eq), mk_type rty, mk_type qty]
     end
@@ -386,12 +388,12 @@
   exception DECODE
     
   fun decode_code_eq thm =
-    if nprems_of thm > 0 then raise DECODE 
+    if Thm.nprems_of thm > 0 then raise DECODE 
     else
       let
         val [abs_eq, rep_eq, rty, qty] = Conjunction.elim_balanced 4 thm
         val opt_rep_eq = if Thm.eq_thm_prop (rep_eq, TrueI) then NONE else SOME rep_eq
-        fun dest_type typ = typ |> Drule.dest_term |> term_of |> Logic.dest_type
+        fun dest_type typ = typ |> Drule.dest_term |> Thm.term_of |> Logic.dest_type
       in
         (abs_eq, opt_rep_eq, (dest_type rty, dest_type qty)) 
       end
@@ -508,7 +510,7 @@
             map_interrupt prove assms
           end
     
-        fun cconl_of thm = Drule.strip_imp_concl (cprop_of thm)
+        fun cconl_of thm = Drule.strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of thm)
         fun lhs_of thm = fst (Thm.dest_equals (cconl_of thm))
         fun rhs_of thm = snd (Thm.dest_equals (cconl_of thm))
         val rule1 = Thm.incr_indexes (#maxidx (Thm.rep_cterm ct) + 1) rule;
@@ -622,7 +624,7 @@
     val (prsp_tm, rsp_prsp_eq) = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (rsp_rel $ forced_rhs $ forced_rhs)
       |> Proof_Context.cterm_of lthy
       |> cr_to_pcr_conv
-      |> ` concl_of
+      |> `Thm.concl_of
       |>> Logic.dest_equals
       |>> snd
     val to_rsp = rsp_prsp_eq RS Drule.equal_elim_rule2
@@ -637,7 +639,7 @@
       | NONE =>  
         let
           val readable_rsp_thm_eq = mk_readable_rsp_thm_eq prsp_tm lthy
-          val (readable_rsp_tm, _) = Logic.dest_implies (prop_of readable_rsp_thm_eq)
+          val (readable_rsp_tm, _) = Logic.dest_implies (Thm.prop_of readable_rsp_thm_eq)
           val readable_rsp_tm_tnames = rename_to_tnames lthy readable_rsp_tm
       
           fun after_qed' thm_list lthy = 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_info.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_info.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_info.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
       end
 
     val ((_, [rel_quot_thm_fixed]), ctxt') = Variable.importT [rel_quot_thm] ctxt
-    val rel_quot_thm_prop = prop_of rel_quot_thm_fixed
+    val rel_quot_thm_prop = Thm.prop_of rel_quot_thm_fixed
     val rel_quot_thm_concl = Logic.strip_imp_concl rel_quot_thm_prop
     val rel_quot_thm_prems = Logic.strip_imp_prems rel_quot_thm_prop;
     val concl_absT = quot_term_absT ctxt' rel_quot_thm_concl
@@ -184,7 +184,7 @@
 fun add_quot_map rel_quot_thm ctxt = 
   let
     val _ = Context.cases (K ()) (quot_map_thm_sanity_check rel_quot_thm) ctxt
-    val rel_quot_thm_concl = (Logic.strip_imp_concl o prop_of) rel_quot_thm
+    val rel_quot_thm_concl = (Logic.strip_imp_concl o Thm.prop_of) rel_quot_thm
     val (_, abs, _, _) = (dest_Quotient o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop) rel_quot_thm_concl
     val relatorT_name = (fst o dest_Type o fst o dest_funT o fastype_of) abs
     val minfo = {rel_quot_thm = rel_quot_thm}
@@ -204,7 +204,7 @@
          [Pretty.str "type:", 
           Pretty.str ty_name,
           Pretty.str "quot. theorem:", 
-          Syntax.pretty_term ctxt (prop_of rel_quot_thm)])
+          Syntax.pretty_term ctxt (Thm.prop_of rel_quot_thm)])
   in
     map prt_map (Symtab.dest (get_quot_maps ctxt))
     |> Pretty.big_list "maps for type constructors:"
@@ -243,11 +243,11 @@
        [Pretty.str "type:", 
         Pretty.str qty_name,
         Pretty.str "quot. thm:",
-        Syntax.pretty_term ctxt (prop_of quot_thm),
+        Syntax.pretty_term ctxt (Thm.prop_of quot_thm),
         Pretty.str "pcrel_def thm:",
-        option_fold (Pretty.str "-") ((Syntax.pretty_term ctxt) o prop_of o #pcrel_def) pcr_info,
+        option_fold (Pretty.str "-") ((Syntax.pretty_term ctxt) o Thm.prop_of o #pcrel_def) pcr_info,
         Pretty.str "pcr_cr_eq thm:",
-        option_fold (Pretty.str "-") ((Syntax.pretty_term ctxt) o prop_of o #pcr_cr_eq) pcr_info])
+        option_fold (Pretty.str "-") ((Syntax.pretty_term ctxt) o Thm.prop_of o #pcr_cr_eq) pcr_info])
   in
     map prt_quot (Symtab.dest (get_quotients ctxt))
     |> Pretty.big_list "quotients:"
@@ -304,13 +304,13 @@
 fun introduce_polarities rule =
   let
     val dest_less_eq = HOLogic.dest_bin @{const_name "less_eq"} dummyT
-    val prems_pairs = map (dest_less_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop) (prems_of rule)
+    val prems_pairs = map (dest_less_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop) (Thm.prems_of rule)
     val equal_prems = filter op= prems_pairs
     val _ =
       if null equal_prems then () 
       else error "The rule contains reflexive assumptions."
     val concl_pairs = rule 
-      |> concl_of
+      |> Thm.concl_of
       |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop
       |> dest_less_eq
       |> apply2 (snd o strip_comb)
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@
   let
     fun find_eq_rule thm ctxt =
       let
-        val concl_rhs = (hd o get_args 1 o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o concl_of) thm;
+        val concl_rhs = (hd o get_args 1 o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.concl_of) thm;
         val rules = Item_Net.retrieve (Transfer.get_relator_eq_item_net ctxt) concl_rhs;
       in
         find_first (fn thm => Pattern.matches (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt) (concl_rhs, 
@@ -372,7 +372,7 @@
   let
     val pol_mono_rule = introduce_polarities mono_rule
     val mono_ruleT_name = (fst o dest_Type o fst o relation_types o fst o relation_types o snd o 
-      dest_Const o head_of o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o concl_of) pol_mono_rule
+      dest_Const o head_of o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.concl_of) pol_mono_rule
     val _ = if Symtab.defined (get_relator_distr_data' ctxt) mono_ruleT_name 
       then error ("Monotocity rule for type " ^ quote mono_ruleT_name ^ " is already_defined.")
       else ()
@@ -389,7 +389,7 @@
   fun add_distr_rule update_entry distr_rule ctxt =
     let
       val distr_ruleT_name = (fst o dest_Type o fst o relation_types o fst o relation_types o snd o 
-        dest_Const o head_of o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o concl_of) distr_rule
+        dest_Const o head_of o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.concl_of) distr_rule
     in
       if Symtab.defined (get_relator_distr_data' ctxt) distr_ruleT_name then 
         Data.map (map_relator_distr_data (Symtab.map_entry distr_ruleT_name (update_entry distr_rule))) 
@@ -441,8 +441,8 @@
 local
   fun sanity_check rule =
     let
-      val assms = map (perhaps (try HOLogic.dest_Trueprop)) (prems_of rule)
-      val concl = (perhaps (try HOLogic.dest_Trueprop)) (concl_of rule);
+      val assms = map (perhaps (try HOLogic.dest_Trueprop)) (Thm.prems_of rule)
+      val concl = (perhaps (try HOLogic.dest_Trueprop)) (Thm.concl_of rule);
       val (lhs, rhs) =
         (case concl of
           Const (@{const_name less_eq}, _) $ (lhs as Const (@{const_name relcompp},_) $ _ $ _) $ rhs =>
@@ -477,7 +477,7 @@
   fun add_distr_rule distr_rule ctxt = 
     let
       val _ = sanity_check distr_rule
-      val concl = (perhaps (try HOLogic.dest_Trueprop)) (concl_of distr_rule)
+      val concl = (perhaps (try HOLogic.dest_Trueprop)) (Thm.concl_of distr_rule)
     in
       (case concl of
         Const (@{const_name less_eq}, _) $ (Const (@{const_name relcompp},_) $ _ $ _) $ _ =>
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_setup.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_setup.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_setup.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -98,7 +98,7 @@
 in
   fun define_pcr_cr_eq lthy pcr_rel_def =
     let
-      val lhs = (term_of o Thm.lhs_of) pcr_rel_def
+      val lhs = (Thm.term_of o Thm.lhs_of) pcr_rel_def
       val qty_name = (Binding.name o Long_Name.base_name o fst o dest_Type o List.last o binder_types o fastype_of) lhs
       val args = (snd o strip_comb) lhs
       
@@ -109,7 +109,7 @@
           val (fresh_var, ctxt) = yield_singleton Variable.invent_types sort ctxt
           val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
         in
-          ((cterm_of thy var, cterm_of thy (HOLogic.eq_const (TFree fresh_var))), ctxt)
+          ((Thm.cterm_of thy var, Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.eq_const (TFree fresh_var))), ctxt)
         end
       
       val orig_lthy = lthy
@@ -120,7 +120,7 @@
         |> Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.arg1_conv 
           (Transfer.bottom_rewr_conv (Transfer.get_relator_eq lthy))))
   in
-    case (term_of o Thm.rhs_of) pcr_cr_eq of
+    case (Thm.term_of o Thm.rhs_of) pcr_cr_eq of
       Const (@{const_name "relcompp"}, _) $ Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ _ =>
         let
           val thm = 
@@ -172,13 +172,13 @@
 fun quot_thm_sanity_check ctxt quot_thm =
   let
     val _ = 
-      if (nprems_of quot_thm > 0) then   
+      if (Thm.nprems_of quot_thm > 0) then   
           raise QUOT_ERROR [Pretty.block
             [Pretty.str "The Quotient theorem has extra assumptions:",
              Pretty.brk 1,
              Display.pretty_thm ctxt quot_thm]]
       else ()
-    val _ = quot_thm |> concl_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> dest_Quotient
+    val _ = quot_thm |> Thm.concl_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> dest_Quotient
     handle TERM _ => raise QUOT_ERROR
           [Pretty.block
             [Pretty.str "The Quotient theorem is not of the right form:",
@@ -290,7 +290,7 @@
       val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
       val orig_ctxt = ctxt
       val (fixed_goal, ctxt) = yield_singleton (import_terms_exclude not_fix) goal ctxt
-      val init_goal = Goal.init (cterm_of thy fixed_goal)
+      val init_goal = Goal.init (Thm.cterm_of thy fixed_goal)
     in
       (singleton (Variable.export ctxt orig_ctxt) o Goal.conclude) (the (SINGLE tac init_goal))
     end
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@
           val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
           val orig_ctxt = ctxt
           val (fixed_goal, ctxt) = yield_singleton (Variable.import_terms true) goal ctxt
-          val init_goal = Goal.init (cterm_of thy fixed_goal)
+          val init_goal = Goal.init (Thm.cterm_of thy fixed_goal)
           val rules = Transfer.get_transfer_raw ctxt
           val rules = constraint :: OO_rules @ rules
           val tac =
@@ -318,8 +318,9 @@
       
       fun make_goal pcr_def constr =
         let 
-          val pred_name = (fst o dest_Const o strip_args 1 o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) constr
-          val arg = (fst o Logic.dest_equals o prop_of) pcr_def
+          val pred_name =
+            (fst o dest_Const o strip_args 1 o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) constr
+          val arg = (fst o Logic.dest_equals o Thm.prop_of) pcr_def
         in
           HOLogic.mk_Trueprop ((Const (pred_name, (fastype_of arg) --> HOLogic.boolT)) $ arg)
         end
@@ -337,8 +338,9 @@
         in
           fn thm => 
             let
-              val prems = map HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (prems_of thm)
-              val thm_name = (Long_Name.base_name o fst o dest_Const o strip_args 1 o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o concl_of) thm
+              val prems = map HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.prems_of thm)
+              val thm_name =
+                (Long_Name.base_name o fst o dest_Const o strip_args 1 o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.concl_of) thm
               val non_trivial_assms = filter_out is_trivial_assm prems
             in
               if null non_trivial_assms then ()
@@ -378,9 +380,9 @@
          @{thm id_transfer}
         |> Thm.incr_indexes (Term.maxidx_of_term parametrized_relator + 1)
         |> Conv.fconv_rule(HOLogic.Trueprop_conv (Conv.arg_conv id_unfold then_conv Conv.arg1_conv id_unfold))
-      val var = Var (hd (Term.add_vars (prop_of id_transfer) []))
+      val var = Var (hd (Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of id_transfer) []))
       val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of lthy
-      val inst = [(cterm_of thy var, cterm_of thy parametrized_relator)]
+      val inst = [(Thm.cterm_of thy var, Thm.cterm_of thy parametrized_relator)]
       val id_par_thm = Drule.cterm_instantiate inst id_transfer
     in
       Lifting_Def.generate_parametric_transfer_rule lthy id_transfer_rule id_par_thm
@@ -403,7 +405,9 @@
   
   fun fold_Domainp_pcrel pcrel_def thm =
     let
-      val ct = thm |> cprop_of |> Drule.strip_imp_concl |> Thm.dest_arg |> Thm.dest_arg1 |> Thm.dest_arg
+      val ct =
+        thm |> Thm.cprop_of |> Drule.strip_imp_concl
+        |> Thm.dest_arg |> Thm.dest_arg1 |> Thm.dest_arg
       val pcrel_def = Thm.incr_indexes (#maxidx (Thm.rep_cterm ct) + 1) pcrel_def
       val thm = Thm.instantiate (Thm.match (ct, Thm.rhs_of pcrel_def)) thm
         handle Pattern.MATCH => raise CTERM ("fold_Domainp_pcrel", [ct, Thm.rhs_of pcrel_def])
@@ -413,7 +417,7 @@
 
   fun reduce_Domainp ctxt rules thm =
     let
-      val goal = thm |> prems_of |> hd
+      val goal = thm |> Thm.prems_of |> hd
       val var = goal |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> dest_comb |> snd |> dest_Var 
       val reduced_assm =
         reduce_goal [var] goal (TRY (REPEAT_ALL_NEW (resolve_tac ctxt rules) 1)) ctxt
@@ -425,7 +429,7 @@
     let
       fun reduce_first_assm ctxt rules thm =
         let
-          val goal = thm |> prems_of |> hd
+          val goal = thm |> Thm.prems_of |> hd
           val reduced_assm =
             reduce_goal [] goal (TRY (REPEAT_ALL_NEW (resolve_tac ctxt rules) 1)) ctxt
         in
@@ -626,7 +630,7 @@
   let
     val transfer_attr = Attrib.internal (K Transfer.transfer_add)
     val transfer_domain_attr = Attrib.internal (K Transfer.transfer_domain_add)
-    val (_ $ rep_fun $ _ $ typedef_set) = (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) typedef_thm
+    val (_ $ rep_fun $ _ $ typedef_set) = (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) typedef_thm
     val (T_def, lthy) = define_crel rep_fun lthy
     (**)
     val T_def = Morphism.thm (Local_Theory.target_morphism lthy) T_def
@@ -742,12 +746,12 @@
 fun setup_lifting_cmd xthm opt_reflp_xthm opt_par_xthm lthy =
   let 
     val input_thm = singleton (Attrib.eval_thms lthy) xthm
-    val input_term = (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) input_thm
+    val input_term = (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) input_thm
       handle TERM _ => error "Unsupported type of a theorem. Only Quotient or type_definition are supported."
 
     fun sanity_check_reflp_thm reflp_thm = 
       let
-        val reflp_tm = (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) reflp_thm
+        val reflp_tm = (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) reflp_thm
           handle TERM _ => error "Invalid form of the reflexivity theorem. Use \"reflp R\"."
       in
         case reflp_tm of
@@ -813,13 +817,13 @@
           let
             val pcrel_def = #pcrel_def pcr
             val pcr_cr_eq = #pcr_cr_eq pcr
-            val (def_lhs, _) = Logic.dest_equals (prop_of pcrel_def)
+            val (def_lhs, _) = Logic.dest_equals (Thm.prop_of pcrel_def)
               handle TERM _ => raise PCR_ERROR [Pretty.block 
                     [Pretty.str "The pcr definiton theorem is not a plain meta equation:",
                     Pretty.brk 1,
                     Display.pretty_thm ctxt pcrel_def]]
             val pcr_const_def = head_of def_lhs
-            val (eq_lhs, eq_rhs) = HOLogic.dest_eq (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (prop_of pcr_cr_eq))
+            val (eq_lhs, eq_rhs) = HOLogic.dest_eq (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.prop_of pcr_cr_eq))
               handle TERM _ => raise PCR_ERROR [Pretty.block 
                     [Pretty.str "The pcr_cr equation theorem is not a plain equation:",
                     Pretty.brk 1,
@@ -939,7 +943,7 @@
     val transfer_rel_name = transfer_rel |> dest_Const |> fst;
     fun has_transfer_rel thm = 
       let
-        val concl = thm |> concl_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop
+        val concl = thm |> Thm.concl_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop
       in
         member op= (fold_transfer_rel (fn tm => Term.add_const_names tm []) concl) transfer_rel_name
       end
@@ -952,7 +956,7 @@
 
 fun get_transfer_rel (qinfo : Lifting_Info.quotient) =
   let
-    fun get_pcrel pcr_def = pcr_def |> concl_of |> Logic.dest_equals |> fst |> head_of
+    fun get_pcrel pcr_def = pcr_def |> Thm.concl_of |> Logic.dest_equals |> fst |> head_of
   in
     if is_some (#pcr_info qinfo) 
       then get_pcrel (#pcrel_def (the (#pcr_info qinfo)))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_term.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_term.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_term.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -128,7 +128,7 @@
        Pretty.str "found."]))
   end
 
-fun is_id_quot thm = (prop_of thm = prop_of @{thm identity_quotient})
+fun is_id_quot thm = (Thm.prop_of thm = Thm.prop_of @{thm identity_quotient})  (* FIXME equality!? *)
 
 fun zip_Tvars ctxt type_name rty_Tvars qty_Tvars =
   case try (get_rel_quot_thm ctxt) type_name of
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@
 
         val rty = Type (type_name, rty_Tvars)
         val qty = Type (type_name, qty_Tvars)
-        val rel_quot_thm_concl = (Logic.strip_imp_concl o prop_of) rel_quot_thm
+        val rel_quot_thm_concl = (Logic.strip_imp_concl o Thm.prop_of) rel_quot_thm
         val schematic_rel_absT = quot_term_absT rel_quot_thm_concl;
         val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
         val absT = rty --> qty
@@ -180,7 +180,7 @@
         val _ = Sign.typ_unify thy (schematic_rel_absT, schematic_absT) (Vartab.empty,maxidx)
           handle Type.TUNIFY => equiv_univ_err ctxt schematic_rel_absT schematic_absT
         val subs = raw_match (schematic_rel_absT, absT) Vartab.empty
-        val rel_quot_thm_prems = (Logic.strip_imp_prems o prop_of) rel_quot_thm
+        val rel_quot_thm_prems = (Logic.strip_imp_prems o Thm.prop_of) rel_quot_thm
       in
         map (dest_funT o 
              Envir.subst_type subs o
@@ -278,7 +278,7 @@
     val (_, qty_schematic) = quot_thm_rty_qty quot_thm
     val match_env = Sign.typ_match thy (qty_schematic, qty) Vartab.empty
     fun prep_ty thy (x, (S, ty)) =
-      (ctyp_of thy (TVar (x, S)), ctyp_of thy ty)
+      (Thm.ctyp_of thy (TVar (x, S)), Thm.ctyp_of thy ty)
     val ty_inst = Vartab.fold (cons o (prep_ty thy)) match_env []
   in
     Thm.instantiate (ty_inst, []) quot_thm
@@ -372,7 +372,8 @@
       then 
         let 
           val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
-          val instantiated_id_quot_thm = instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of thy ty)] [] @{thm identity_quotient}
+          val instantiated_id_quot_thm =
+            instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of thy ty)] [] @{thm identity_quotient}
         in
           (instantiated_id_quot_thm, (table, ctxt)) 
         end
@@ -389,7 +390,7 @@
           let
             val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
             val (Q_t, ctxt') = get_fresh_Q_t ctxt
-            val Q_thm = Thm.assume (cterm_of thy Q_t)
+            val Q_thm = Thm.assume (Thm.cterm_of thy Q_t)
             val table' = (ty, Q_thm)::table
           in
             (Q_thm, (table', ctxt'))
@@ -422,7 +423,7 @@
 (* Parametrization *)
 
 local
-  fun get_lhs rule = (Thm.dest_fun o Thm.dest_arg o strip_imp_concl o cprop_of) rule;
+  fun get_lhs rule = (Thm.dest_fun o Thm.dest_arg o strip_imp_concl o Thm.cprop_of) rule;
   
   fun no_imp _ = raise CTERM ("no implication", []);
   
@@ -464,7 +465,7 @@
   fun merge_transfer_relations ctxt ctm =
     let
       val ctm = Thm.dest_arg ctm
-      val tm = term_of ctm
+      val tm = Thm.term_of ctm
       val rel = (hd o get_args 2) tm
   
       fun same_constants (Const (n1,_)) (Const (n2,_)) = n1 = n2
@@ -472,11 +473,11 @@
       
       fun prove_extra_assms ctxt ctm distr_rule =
         let
-          fun prove_assm assm = try (Goal.prove ctxt [] [] (term_of assm))
+          fun prove_assm assm = try (Goal.prove ctxt [] [] (Thm.term_of assm))
             (fn _ => SOLVED' (REPEAT_ALL_NEW (resolve_tac ctxt (Transfer.get_transfer_raw ctxt))) 1)
   
           fun is_POS_or_NEG ctm =
-            case (head_of o term_of o Thm.dest_arg) ctm of
+            case (head_of o Thm.term_of o Thm.dest_arg) ctm of
               Const (@{const_name POS}, _) => true
               | Const (@{const_name NEG}, _) => true
               | _ => false
@@ -515,7 +516,7 @@
               else
                 let 
                   val pcrel_def = get_pcrel_def ctxt ((fst o dest_Type) qty)
-                  val pcrel_const = (head_of o fst o Logic.dest_equals o prop_of) pcrel_def
+                  val pcrel_const = (head_of o fst o Logic.dest_equals o Thm.prop_of) pcrel_def
                 in
                   if same_constants pcrel_const (head_of trans_rel) then
                     let
@@ -547,7 +548,7 @@
   let
     fun parametrize_relation_conv ctm =
       let
-        val (rty, qty) = (relation_types o fastype_of) (term_of ctm)
+        val (rty, qty) = (relation_types o fastype_of) (Thm.term_of ctm)
       in
         if same_type_constrs (rty, qty) then
           if forall op= (Targs rty ~~ Targs qty) then
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_util.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_util.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Lifting/lifting_util.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -57,19 +57,19 @@
 *)
 
 fun quot_thm_rel quot_thm =
-  case (dest_Quotient o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) quot_thm of
+  case (dest_Quotient o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) quot_thm of
     (rel, _, _, _) => rel
 
 fun quot_thm_abs quot_thm =
-  case (dest_Quotient o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) quot_thm of
+  case (dest_Quotient o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) quot_thm of
     (_, abs, _, _) => abs
 
 fun quot_thm_rep quot_thm =
-  case (dest_Quotient o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) quot_thm of
+  case (dest_Quotient o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) quot_thm of
     (_, _, rep, _) => rep
 
 fun quot_thm_crel quot_thm =
-  case (dest_Quotient o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) quot_thm of
+  case (dest_Quotient o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) quot_thm of
     (_, _, _, crel) => crel
 
 fun quot_thm_rty_qty quot_thm =
@@ -87,7 +87,7 @@
     Thm.implies_elim thm (Thm.assume assm)
   end
 
-fun undisch_all thm = funpow (nprems_of thm) undisch thm
+fun undisch_all thm = funpow (Thm.nprems_of thm) undisch thm
 
 fun is_fun_type (Type (@{type_name fun}, _)) = true
   | is_fun_type _ = false
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Meson/meson.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Meson/meson.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Meson/meson.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -101,13 +101,13 @@
 fun first_order_resolve thA thB =
   (case
     try (fn () =>
-      let val thy = theory_of_thm thA
-          val tmA = concl_of thA
-          val Const(@{const_name Pure.imp},_) $ tmB $ _ = prop_of thB
+      let val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm thA
+          val tmA = Thm.concl_of thA
+          val Const(@{const_name Pure.imp},_) $ tmB $ _ = Thm.prop_of thB
           val tenv =
             Pattern.first_order_match thy (tmB, tmA)
                                           (Vartab.empty, Vartab.empty) |> snd
-          val ct_pairs = map (apply2 (cterm_of thy) o term_pair_of) (Vartab.dest tenv)
+          val ct_pairs = map (apply2 (Thm.cterm_of thy) o term_pair_of) (Vartab.dest tenv)
       in  thA RS (cterm_instantiate ct_pairs thB)  end) () of
     SOME th => th
   | NONE => raise THM ("first_order_resolve", 0, [thA, thB]))
@@ -152,10 +152,10 @@
 (* Forward proof while preserving bound variables names *)
 fun rename_bound_vars_RS th rl =
   let
-    val t = concl_of th
-    val r = concl_of rl
+    val t = Thm.concl_of th
+    val r = Thm.concl_of rl
     val th' = th RS Thm.rename_boundvars r (protect_bound_var_names r) rl
-    val t' = concl_of th'
+    val t' = Thm.concl_of th'
   in Thm.rename_boundvars t' (fix_bound_var_names t t') th' end
 
 (*raises exception if no rules apply*)
@@ -171,11 +171,11 @@
    problem, due to the (spurious) choices between projection and imitation. The
    workaround is to instantiate "?P := (%c. ... c ... c ... c ...)" manually. *)
 fun quant_resolve_tac ctxt th i st =
-  case (concl_of st, prop_of th) of
+  case (Thm.concl_of st, Thm.prop_of th) of
     (@{const Trueprop} $ (Var _ $ (c as Free _)), @{const Trueprop} $ _) =>
     let
-      val cc = cterm_of (theory_of_thm th) c
-      val ct = Thm.dest_arg (cprop_of th)
+      val cc = Thm.cterm_of (Thm.theory_of_thm th) c
+      val ct = Thm.dest_arg (Thm.cprop_of th)
     in resolve_tac ctxt [th] i (Drule.instantiate' [] [SOME (Thm.lambda cc ct)] st) end
   | _ => resolve_tac ctxt [th] i st
 
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@
   | signed_lits_aux (Const(@{const_name Not},_) $ P) (poslits, neglits) = (poslits, P::neglits)
   | signed_lits_aux P (poslits, neglits) = (P::poslits, neglits);
 
-fun signed_lits th = signed_lits_aux (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of th)) ([],[]);
+fun signed_lits th = signed_lits_aux (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of th)) ([],[]);
 
 (*Literals like X=X are tautologous*)
 fun taut_poslit (Const(@{const_name HOL.eq},_) $ t $ u) = t aconv u
@@ -258,7 +258,7 @@
 
 fun refl_clause_aux 0 th = th
   | refl_clause_aux n th =
-       case HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of th) of
+       case HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of th) of
           (Const (@{const_name HOL.disj}, _) $ (Const (@{const_name HOL.disj}, _) $ _ $ _) $ _) =>
             refl_clause_aux n (th RS disj_assoc)    (*isolate an atom as first disjunct*)
         | (Const (@{const_name HOL.disj}, _) $ (Const(@{const_name Not},_) $ (Const(@{const_name HOL.eq},_) $ t $ u)) $ _) =>
@@ -275,7 +275,7 @@
 
 (*Simplify a clause by applying reflexivity to its negated equality literals*)
 fun refl_clause th =
-  let val neqs = notequal_lits_count (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of th))
+  let val neqs = notequal_lits_count (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of th))
   in  zero_var_indexes (refl_clause_aux neqs th)  end
   handle TERM _ => th;  (*probably dest_Trueprop on a weird theorem*)
 
@@ -302,7 +302,7 @@
 
 (*Remove duplicate literals, if there are any*)
 fun nodups ctxt th =
-  if has_duplicates (op =) (literals (prop_of th))
+  if has_duplicates (op =) (literals (Thm.prop_of th))
     then nodups_aux ctxt [] th
     else th;
 
@@ -353,7 +353,8 @@
   fun freeze_spec th ctxt =
     let
       val cert = Proof_Context.cterm_of ctxt;
-      val ([x], ctxt') = Variable.variant_fixes [name_of (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of th))] ctxt;
+      val ([x], ctxt') =
+        Variable.variant_fixes [name_of (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of th))] ctxt;
       val spec' = Thm.instantiate ([], [(spec_var, cert (Free (x, spec_varT)))]) spec;
     in (th RS spec', ctxt') end
 end;
@@ -371,10 +372,10 @@
 fun cnf old_skolem_ths ctxt (th, ths) =
   let val ctxt_ref = Unsynchronized.ref ctxt   (* FIXME ??? *)
       fun cnf_aux (th,ths) =
-        if not (can HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (prop_of th)) then ths (*meta-level: ignore*)
-        else if not (has_conns [@{const_name All}, @{const_name Ex}, @{const_name HOL.conj}] (prop_of th))
+        if not (can HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.prop_of th)) then ths (*meta-level: ignore*)
+        else if not (has_conns [@{const_name All}, @{const_name Ex}, @{const_name HOL.conj}] (Thm.prop_of th))
         then nodups ctxt th :: ths (*no work to do, terminate*)
-        else case head_of (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of th)) of
+        else case head_of (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of th)) of
             Const (@{const_name HOL.conj}, _) => (*conjunction*)
                 cnf_aux (th RS conjunct1, cnf_aux (th RS conjunct2, ths))
           | Const (@{const_name All}, _) => (*universal quantifier*)
@@ -395,7 +396,7 @@
           | _ => nodups ctxt th :: ths  (*no work to do*)
       and cnf_nil th = cnf_aux (th, [])
       val cls =
-        if has_too_many_clauses ctxt (concl_of th) then
+        if has_too_many_clauses ctxt (Thm.concl_of th) then
           (trace_msg ctxt (fn () =>
                "cnf is ignoring: " ^ Display.string_of_thm ctxt th); ths)
         else
@@ -417,7 +418,7 @@
 
 (*Associate disjuctions to right -- make leftmost disjunct a LITERAL*)
 fun assoc_right th =
-  if is_left (prop_of th) then assoc_right (th RS disj_assoc)
+  if is_left (Thm.prop_of th) then assoc_right (th RS disj_assoc)
   else th;
 
 (*Must check for negative literal first!*)
@@ -439,7 +440,7 @@
 
 (*Create a meta-level Horn clause*)
 fun make_horn crules th =
-  if ok4horn (concl_of th)
+  if ok4horn (Thm.concl_of th)
   then make_horn crules (tryres(th,crules)) handle THM _ => th
   else th;
 
@@ -449,7 +450,7 @@
   let fun rots (0,_) = hcs
         | rots (k,th) = zero_var_indexes (make_horn crules th) ::
                         rots(k-1, assoc_right (th RS disj_comm))
-  in case nliterals(prop_of th) of
+  in case nliterals(Thm.prop_of th) of
         1 => th::hcs
       | n => rots(n, assoc_right th)
   end;
@@ -461,7 +462,7 @@
     in  fn ths => #2 (fold_rev name1 ths (length ths, []))  end;
 
 (*Is the given disjunction an all-negative support clause?*)
-fun is_negative th = forall (not o #1) (literals (prop_of th));
+fun is_negative th = forall (not o #1) (literals (Thm.prop_of th));
 
 val neg_clauses = filter is_negative;
 
@@ -489,12 +490,12 @@
        TRYING_eq_assume_tac (i-1) (Thm.eq_assumption i st)
        handle THM _ => TRYING_eq_assume_tac (i-1) st;
 
-fun TRYALL_eq_assume_tac st = TRYING_eq_assume_tac (nprems_of st) st;
+fun TRYALL_eq_assume_tac st = TRYING_eq_assume_tac (Thm.nprems_of st) st;
 
 (*Loop checking: FAIL if trying to prove the same thing twice
   -- if *ANY* subgoal has repeated literals*)
 fun check_tac st =
-  if exists (fn prem => has_reps (rhyps(prem,[]))) (prems_of st)
+  if exists (fn prem => has_reps (rhyps(prem,[]))) (Thm.prems_of st)
   then  Seq.empty  else  Seq.single st;
 
 
@@ -506,7 +507,7 @@
 (*Sums the sizes of the subgoals, ignoring hypotheses (ancestors)*)
 fun addconcl prem sz = size_of_term (Logic.strip_assums_concl prem) + sz;
 
-fun size_of_subgoals st = fold_rev addconcl (prems_of st) 0;
+fun size_of_subgoals st = fold_rev addconcl (Thm.prems_of st) 0;
 
 
 (*Negation Normal Form*)
@@ -518,7 +519,7 @@
   | ok4nnf _ = false;
 
 fun make_nnf1 ctxt th =
-  if ok4nnf (concl_of th)
+  if ok4nnf (Thm.concl_of th)
   then make_nnf1 ctxt (tryres(th, nnf_rls))
     handle THM ("tryres", _, _) =>
         forward_res ctxt (make_nnf1 ctxt)
@@ -552,9 +553,10 @@
   #> simplify (put_simpset nnf_ss ctxt)
   #> rewrite_rule ctxt @{thms Let_def [abs_def]}
 
-fun make_nnf ctxt th = case prems_of th of
+fun make_nnf ctxt th =
+  (case Thm.prems_of th of
     [] => th |> presimplify ctxt |> make_nnf1 ctxt
-  | _ => raise THM ("make_nnf: premises in argument", 0, [th]);
+  | _ => raise THM ("make_nnf: premises in argument", 0, [th]));
 
 fun choice_theorems thy =
   try (Global_Theory.get_thm thy) "Hilbert_Choice.choice" |> the_list
@@ -564,7 +566,7 @@
 fun skolemize_with_choice_theorems ctxt choice_ths =
   let
     fun aux th =
-      if not (has_conns [@{const_name Ex}] (prop_of th)) then
+      if not (has_conns [@{const_name Ex}] (Thm.prop_of th)) then
         th
       else
         tryres (th, choice_ths @
@@ -615,35 +617,35 @@
 
 val ext_cong_neq = @{thm ext_cong_neq}
 val F_ext_cong_neq =
-  Term.add_vars (prop_of @{thm ext_cong_neq}) []
+  Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of @{thm ext_cong_neq}) []
   |> filter (fn ((s, _), _) => s = "F")
   |> the_single |> Var
 
 (* Strengthens "f g ~= f h" to "f g ~= f h & (EX x. g x ~= h x)". *)
 fun cong_extensionalize_thm thy th =
-  case concl_of th of
+  (case Thm.concl_of th of
     @{const Trueprop} $ (@{const Not}
         $ (Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, Type (_, [T, _]))
            $ (t as _ $ _) $ (u as _ $ _))) =>
     (case get_F_pattern T t u of
        SOME p =>
-       let val inst = [apply2 (cterm_of thy) (F_ext_cong_neq, p)] in
+       let val inst = [apply2 (Thm.cterm_of thy) (F_ext_cong_neq, p)] in
          th RS cterm_instantiate inst ext_cong_neq
        end
      | NONE => th)
-  | _ => th
+  | _ => th)
 
 (* Removes the lambdas from an equation of the form "t = (%x1 ... xn. u)". It
    would be desirable to do this symmetrically but there's at least one existing
    proof in "Tarski" that relies on the current behavior. *)
 fun abs_extensionalize_conv ctxt ct =
-  case term_of ct of
+  (case Thm.term_of ct of
     Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ _ $ Abs _ =>
     ct |> (Conv.rewr_conv @{thm fun_eq_iff [THEN eq_reflection]}
            then_conv abs_extensionalize_conv ctxt)
   | _ $ _ => Conv.comb_conv (abs_extensionalize_conv ctxt) ct
   | Abs _ => Conv.abs_conv (abs_extensionalize_conv o snd) ctxt ct
-  | _ => Conv.all_conv ct
+  | _ => Conv.all_conv ct)
 
 val abs_extensionalize_thm = Conv.fconv_rule o abs_extensionalize_conv
 
@@ -673,7 +675,7 @@
   in Variable.export ctxt' ctxt cnfs @ cls end;
 
 (*Sort clauses by number of literals*)
-fun fewerlits (th1, th2) = nliterals (prop_of th1) < nliterals (prop_of th2)
+fun fewerlits (th1, th2) = nliterals (Thm.prop_of th1) < nliterals (Thm.prop_of th2)
 
 (*Make clauses from a list of theorems, previously Skolemized and put into nnf.
   The resulting clauses are HOL disjunctions.*)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Meson/meson_clausify.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Meson/meson_clausify.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Meson/meson_clausify.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -35,20 +35,20 @@
 
 (**** Transformation of Elimination Rules into First-Order Formulas****)
 
-val cfalse = cterm_of @{theory HOL} @{term False};
-val ctp_false = cterm_of @{theory HOL} (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop @{term False});
+val cfalse = Thm.cterm_of @{theory HOL} @{term False};
+val ctp_false = Thm.cterm_of @{theory HOL} (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop @{term False});
 
 (* Converts an elim-rule into an equivalent theorem that does not have the
    predicate variable. Leaves other theorems unchanged. We simply instantiate
    the conclusion variable to False. (Cf. "transform_elim_prop" in
    "Sledgehammer_Util".) *)
 fun transform_elim_theorem th =
-  case concl_of th of    (*conclusion variable*)
-       @{const Trueprop} $ (v as Var (_, @{typ bool})) =>
-           Thm.instantiate ([], [(cterm_of @{theory HOL} v, cfalse)]) th
-    | v as Var(_, @{typ prop}) =>
-           Thm.instantiate ([], [(cterm_of @{theory HOL} v, ctp_false)]) th
-    | _ => th
+  (case Thm.concl_of th of    (*conclusion variable*)
+    @{const Trueprop} $ (v as Var (_, @{typ bool})) =>
+      Thm.instantiate ([], [(Thm.cterm_of @{theory HOL} v, cfalse)]) th
+  | v as Var(_, @{typ prop}) =>
+      Thm.instantiate ([], [(Thm.cterm_of @{theory HOL} v, ctp_false)]) th
+  | _ => th)
 
 
 (**** SKOLEMIZATION BY INFERENCE (lcp) ****)
@@ -83,7 +83,7 @@
       | dec_sko (@{const disj} $ p $ q) rhss = rhss |> dec_sko p |> dec_sko q
       | dec_sko (@{const Trueprop} $ p) rhss = dec_sko p rhss
       | dec_sko _ rhss = rhss
-  in  dec_sko (prop_of th) []  end;
+  in  dec_sko (Thm.prop_of th) []  end;
 
 
 (**** REPLACING ABSTRACTIONS BY COMBINATORS ****)
@@ -94,20 +94,20 @@
   | is_quasi_lambda_free (Abs _) = false
   | is_quasi_lambda_free _ = true
 
-val [f_B,g_B] = map (cterm_of @{theory}) (Misc_Legacy.term_vars (prop_of @{thm abs_B}));
-val [g_C,f_C] = map (cterm_of @{theory}) (Misc_Legacy.term_vars (prop_of @{thm abs_C}));
-val [f_S,g_S] = map (cterm_of @{theory}) (Misc_Legacy.term_vars (prop_of @{thm abs_S}));
+val [f_B,g_B] = map (Thm.cterm_of @{theory}) (Misc_Legacy.term_vars (Thm.prop_of @{thm abs_B}));
+val [g_C,f_C] = map (Thm.cterm_of @{theory}) (Misc_Legacy.term_vars (Thm.prop_of @{thm abs_C}));
+val [f_S,g_S] = map (Thm.cterm_of @{theory}) (Misc_Legacy.term_vars (Thm.prop_of @{thm abs_S}));
 
 (* FIXME: Requires more use of cterm constructors. *)
 fun abstract ct =
   let
-      val thy = theory_of_cterm ct
-      val Abs(x,_,body) = term_of ct
-      val Type(@{type_name fun}, [xT,bodyT]) = typ_of (ctyp_of_term ct)
-      val cxT = ctyp_of thy xT
-      val cbodyT = ctyp_of thy bodyT
+      val thy = Thm.theory_of_cterm ct
+      val Abs(x,_,body) = Thm.term_of ct
+      val Type(@{type_name fun}, [xT,bodyT]) = Thm.typ_of (Thm.ctyp_of_term ct)
+      val cxT = Thm.ctyp_of thy xT
+      val cbodyT = Thm.ctyp_of thy bodyT
       fun makeK () =
-        instantiate' [SOME cxT, SOME cbodyT] [SOME (cterm_of thy body)]
+        instantiate' [SOME cxT, SOME cbodyT] [SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy body)]
                      @{thm abs_K}
   in
       case body of
@@ -118,27 +118,28 @@
         | rator$rand =>
             if Term.is_dependent rator then (*C or S*)
                if Term.is_dependent rand then (*S*)
-                 let val crator = cterm_of thy (Abs(x,xT,rator))
-                     val crand = cterm_of thy (Abs(x,xT,rand))
+                 let val crator = Thm.cterm_of thy (Abs(x,xT,rator))
+                     val crand = Thm.cterm_of thy (Abs(x,xT,rand))
                      val abs_S' = cterm_instantiate [(f_S,crator),(g_S,crand)] @{thm abs_S}
-                     val (_,rhs) = Thm.dest_equals (cprop_of abs_S')
+                     val (_,rhs) = Thm.dest_equals (Thm.cprop_of abs_S')
                  in
                    Thm.transitive abs_S' (Conv.binop_conv abstract rhs)
                  end
                else (*C*)
-                 let val crator = cterm_of thy (Abs(x,xT,rator))
-                     val abs_C' = cterm_instantiate [(f_C,crator),(g_C,cterm_of thy rand)] @{thm abs_C}
-                     val (_,rhs) = Thm.dest_equals (cprop_of abs_C')
+                 let val crator = Thm.cterm_of thy (Abs(x,xT,rator))
+                     val abs_C' =
+                      cterm_instantiate [(f_C,crator),(g_C,Thm.cterm_of thy rand)] @{thm abs_C}
+                     val (_,rhs) = Thm.dest_equals (Thm.cprop_of abs_C')
                  in
                    Thm.transitive abs_C' (Conv.fun_conv (Conv.arg_conv abstract) rhs)
                  end
             else if Term.is_dependent rand then (*B or eta*)
                if rand = Bound 0 then Thm.eta_conversion ct
                else (*B*)
-                 let val crand = cterm_of thy (Abs(x,xT,rand))
-                     val crator = cterm_of thy rator
+                 let val crand = Thm.cterm_of thy (Abs(x,xT,rand))
+                     val crator = Thm.cterm_of thy rator
                      val abs_B' = cterm_instantiate [(f_B,crator),(g_B,crand)] @{thm abs_B}
-                     val (_,rhs) = Thm.dest_equals (cprop_of abs_B')
+                     val (_,rhs) = Thm.dest_equals (Thm.cprop_of abs_B')
                  in Thm.transitive abs_B' (Conv.arg_conv abstract rhs) end
             else makeK()
         | _ => raise Fail "abstract: Bad term"
@@ -146,13 +147,13 @@
 
 (* Traverse a theorem, remplacing lambda-abstractions with combinators. *)
 fun introduce_combinators_in_cterm ct =
-  if is_quasi_lambda_free (term_of ct) then
+  if is_quasi_lambda_free (Thm.term_of ct) then
     Thm.reflexive ct
-  else case term_of ct of
+  else case Thm.term_of ct of
     Abs _ =>
     let
       val (cv, cta) = Thm.dest_abs NONE ct
-      val (v, _) = dest_Free (term_of cv)
+      val (v, _) = dest_Free (Thm.term_of cv)
       val u_th = introduce_combinators_in_cterm cta
       val cu = Thm.rhs_of u_th
       val comb_eq = abstract (Thm.lambda cv cu)
@@ -164,12 +165,12 @@
     end
 
 fun introduce_combinators_in_theorem ctxt th =
-  if is_quasi_lambda_free (prop_of th) then
+  if is_quasi_lambda_free (Thm.prop_of th) then
     th
   else
     let
       val th = Drule.eta_contraction_rule th
-      val eqth = introduce_combinators_in_cterm (cprop_of th)
+      val eqth = introduce_combinators_in_cterm (Thm.cprop_of th)
     in Thm.equal_elim eqth th end
     handle THM (msg, _, _) =>
            (warning ("Error in the combinator translation of " ^ Display.string_of_thm ctxt th ^
@@ -178,7 +179,7 @@
             TrueI)
 
 (*cterms are used throughout for efficiency*)
-val cTrueprop = cterm_of @{theory HOL} HOLogic.Trueprop;
+val cTrueprop = Thm.cterm_of @{theory HOL} HOLogic.Trueprop;
 
 (*Given an abstraction over n variables, replace the bound variables by free
   ones. Return the body, along with the list of free variables.*)
@@ -193,15 +194,15 @@
 fun old_skolem_theorem_of_def ctxt rhs0 =
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
-    val rhs = rhs0 |> Type.legacy_freeze_thaw |> #1 |> cterm_of thy
+    val rhs = rhs0 |> Type.legacy_freeze_thaw |> #1 |> Thm.cterm_of thy
     val rhs' = rhs |> Thm.dest_comb |> snd
     val (ch, frees) = c_variant_abs_multi (rhs', [])
-    val (hilbert, cabs) = ch |> Thm.dest_comb |>> term_of
+    val (hilbert, cabs) = ch |> Thm.dest_comb |>> Thm.term_of
     val T =
       case hilbert of
         Const (_, Type (@{type_name fun}, [_, T])) => T
       | _ => raise TERM ("old_skolem_theorem_of_def: expected \"Eps\"", [hilbert])
-    val cex = cterm_of thy (HOLogic.exists_const T)
+    val cex = Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.exists_const T)
     val ex_tm = Thm.apply cTrueprop (Thm.apply cex cabs)
     val conc =
       Drule.list_comb (rhs, frees)
@@ -219,7 +220,7 @@
 
 fun to_definitional_cnf_with_quantifiers ctxt th =
   let
-    val eqth = CNF.make_cnfx_thm ctxt (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (prop_of th))
+    val eqth = CNF.make_cnfx_thm ctxt (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.prop_of th))
     val eqth = eqth RS @{thm eq_reflection}
     val eqth = eqth RS @{thm TruepropI}
   in Thm.equal_elim eqth th end
@@ -271,7 +272,7 @@
 
 fun zap pos ct =
   ct
-  |> (case term_of ct of
+  |> (case Thm.term_of ct of
         Const (s, _) $ Abs (s', _, _) =>
         if s = @{const_name Pure.all} orelse s = @{const_name All} orelse
            s = @{const_name Ex} then
@@ -325,23 +326,23 @@
             skolemize choice_ths
         val discharger_th = th |> pull_out
         val discharger_th =
-          discharger_th |> has_too_many_clauses ctxt (concl_of discharger_th)
+          discharger_th |> has_too_many_clauses ctxt (Thm.concl_of discharger_th)
                            ? (to_definitional_cnf_with_quantifiers ctxt
                               #> pull_out)
         val zapped_th =
-          discharger_th |> prop_of |> rename_bound_vars_to_be_zapped ax_no
+          discharger_th |> Thm.prop_of |> rename_bound_vars_to_be_zapped ax_no
           |> (if no_choice then
-                Skip_Proof.make_thm thy #> skolemize [cheat_choice] #> cprop_of
+                Skip_Proof.make_thm thy #> skolemize [cheat_choice] #> Thm.cprop_of
               else
-                cterm_of thy)
+                Thm.cterm_of thy)
           |> zap true
         val fixes =
-          [] |> Term.add_free_names (prop_of zapped_th)
+          [] |> Term.add_free_names (Thm.prop_of zapped_th)
              |> filter is_zapped_var_name
         val ctxt' = ctxt |> Variable.add_fixes_direct fixes
         val fully_skolemized_t =
           zapped_th |> singleton (Variable.export ctxt' ctxt)
-                    |> cprop_of |> Thm.dest_equals |> snd |> term_of
+                    |> Thm.cprop_of |> Thm.dest_equals |> snd |> Thm.term_of
       in
         if exists_subterm (fn Var ((s, _), _) =>
                               String.isPrefix new_skolem_var_prefix s
@@ -349,7 +350,7 @@
           let
             val (fully_skolemized_ct, ctxt) =
               Variable.import_terms true [fully_skolemized_t] ctxt
-              |>> the_single |>> cterm_of thy
+              |>> the_single |>> Thm.cterm_of thy
           in
             (SOME (discharger_th, fully_skolemized_ct),
              (Thm.assume fully_skolemized_ct, ctxt))
@@ -358,7 +359,7 @@
          (NONE, (th, ctxt))
       end
     else
-      (NONE, (th |> has_too_many_clauses ctxt (concl_of th)
+      (NONE, (th |> has_too_many_clauses ctxt (Thm.concl_of th)
                     ? to_definitional_cnf_with_quantifiers ctxt, ctxt))
   end
 
@@ -376,14 +377,14 @@
        th ctxt
     val (cnf_ths, ctxt) = clausify nnf_th
     fun intr_imp ct th =
-      Thm.instantiate ([], map (apply2 (cterm_of thy))
+      Thm.instantiate ([], map (apply2 (Thm.cterm_of thy))
                                [(Var (("i", 0), @{typ nat}),
                                  HOLogic.mk_nat ax_no)])
                       (zero_var_indexes @{thm skolem_COMBK_D})
       RS Thm.implies_intr ct th
   in
     (opt |> Option.map (I #>> singleton (Variable.export ctxt ctxt0)
-                        ##> (term_of #> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop
+                        ##> (Thm.term_of #> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop
                              #> singleton (Variable.export_terms ctxt ctxt0))),
      cnf_ths |> map (combinators ? introduce_combinators_in_theorem ctxt
                      #> (case opt of SOME (_, ct) => intr_imp ct | NONE => I))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Metis/metis_generate.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Metis/metis_generate.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Metis/metis_generate.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -216,7 +216,7 @@
         (0 upto length fact_clauses - 1) fact_clauses
     val (old_skolems, props) =
       fold_rev (fn (name, th) => fn (old_skolems, props) =>
-           th |> prop_of |> Logic.strip_imp_concl
+           th |> Thm.prop_of |> Logic.strip_imp_concl
               |> conceal_old_skolem_terms (length clauses) old_skolems
               ||> (lam_trans = liftingN orelse lam_trans = lam_liftingN) ? eliminate_lam_wrappers
               ||> (fn prop => (name, prop) :: props))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Metis/metis_reconstruct.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Metis/metis_reconstruct.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Metis/metis_reconstruct.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -88,7 +88,7 @@
   the (AList.lookup (uncurry Metis_Thm.equal) th_pairs fth)
   handle Option.Option => raise Fail ("Failed to find Metis theorem " ^ Metis_Thm.toString fth)
 
-fun cterm_incr_types thy idx = cterm_of thy o (map_types (Logic.incr_tvar idx))
+fun cterm_incr_types thy idx = Thm.cterm_of thy o map_types (Logic.incr_tvar idx)
 
 (* INFERENCE RULE: AXIOM *)
 
@@ -103,8 +103,8 @@
 fun inst_excluded_middle thy i_atom =
   let
     val th = EXCLUDED_MIDDLE
-    val [vx] = Term.add_vars (prop_of th) []
-    val substs = [(cterm_of thy (Var vx), cterm_of thy i_atom)]
+    val [vx] = Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of th) []
+    val substs = [(Thm.cterm_of thy (Var vx), Thm.cterm_of thy i_atom)]
   in
     cterm_instantiate substs th
   end
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
     val i_th = lookth th_pairs th
-    val i_th_vars = Term.add_vars (prop_of i_th) []
+    val i_th_vars = Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of i_th) []
 
     fun find_var x = the (List.find (fn ((a,_),_) => a=x) i_th_vars)
     fun subst_translation (x,y) =
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
         (* We call "polish_hol_terms" below. *)
         val t = hol_term_of_metis ctxt type_enc sym_tab y
       in
-        SOME (cterm_of thy (Var v), t)
+        SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy (Var v), t)
       end
       handle Option.Option =>
              (trace_msg ctxt (fn () =>
@@ -160,8 +160,8 @@
     val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () =>
       cat_lines ("subst_translations:" ::
         (substs' |> map (fn (x, y) =>
-          Syntax.string_of_term ctxt (term_of x) ^ " |-> " ^
-          Syntax.string_of_term ctxt (term_of y)))))
+          Syntax.string_of_term ctxt (Thm.term_of x) ^ " |-> " ^
+          Syntax.string_of_term ctxt (Thm.term_of y)))))
   in
     cterm_instantiate substs' i_th
   end
@@ -175,7 +175,7 @@
   let
     val tvs = Term.add_tvars (Thm.full_prop_of th) []
     val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm th
-    fun inc_tvar ((a, i), s) = apply2 (ctyp_of thy) (TVar ((a, i), s), TVar ((a, i + inc), s))
+    fun inc_tvar ((a, i), s) = apply2 (Thm.ctyp_of thy) (TVar ((a, i), s), TVar ((a, i + inc), s))
   in
     Thm.instantiate (map inc_tvar tvs, []) th
   end
@@ -188,7 +188,7 @@
     val tha = incr_type_indexes (1 + Thm.maxidx_of thb) tha
     fun res (tha, thb) =
       (case Thm.bicompose (SOME ctxt) {flatten = true, match = false, incremented = true}
-            (false, tha, nprems_of tha) i thb
+            (false, tha, Thm.nprems_of tha) i thb
            |> Seq.list_of |> distinct Thm.eq_thm of
         [th] => th
       | _ =>
@@ -207,13 +207,13 @@
       let
         val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
         val ps = []
-          |> fold (Term.add_vars o prop_of) [tha, thb]
+          |> fold (Term.add_vars o Thm.prop_of) [tha, thb]
           |> AList.group (op =)
           |> maps (fn ((s, _), T :: Ts) => map (fn T' => (Free (s, T), Free (s, T'))) Ts)
           |> rpair (Envir.empty ~1)
           |-> fold (Pattern.unify (Context.Proof ctxt))
           |> Envir.type_env |> Vartab.dest
-          |> map (fn (x, (S, T)) => apply2 (ctyp_of thy) (TVar (x, S), T))
+          |> map (fn (x, (S, T)) => apply2 (Thm.ctyp_of thy) (TVar (x, S), T))
       in
         (* The unifier, which is invoked from "Thm.bicompose", will sometimes refuse to unify
            "?a::?'a" with "?a::?'b" or "?a::nat" and throw a "TERM" exception (with "add_ffpair" as
@@ -248,7 +248,7 @@
 
 (* Permute a rule's premises to move the i-th premise to the last position. *)
 fun make_last i th =
-  let val n = nprems_of th in
+  let val n = Thm.nprems_of th in
     if i >= 1 andalso i <= n then Thm.permute_prems (i - 1) 1 th
     else raise THM ("select_literal", i, [th])
   end
@@ -259,7 +259,7 @@
    don't use this trick in general because it makes the proof object uglier than
    necessary. FIXME. *)
 fun negate_head ctxt th =
-  if exists (fn t => t aconv @{prop "~ False"}) (prems_of th) then
+  if exists (fn t => t aconv @{prop "~ False"}) (Thm.prems_of th) then
     (th RS @{thm select_FalseI})
     |> fold (rewrite_rule ctxt o single) @{thms not_atomize_select atomize_not_select}
   else
@@ -286,11 +286,11 @@
           singleton (hol_terms_of_metis ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab) (Metis_Term.Fn atom)
         val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "  atom: " ^ Syntax.string_of_term ctxt i_atom)
       in
-        (case index_of_literal (s_not i_atom) (prems_of i_th1) of
+        (case index_of_literal (s_not i_atom) (Thm.prems_of i_th1) of
           0 => (trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "Failed to find literal in \"th1\""); i_th1)
         | j1 =>
           (trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "  index th1: " ^ string_of_int j1);
-           (case index_of_literal i_atom (prems_of i_th2) of
+           (case index_of_literal i_atom (Thm.prems_of i_th2) of
              0 => (trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "Failed to find literal in \"th2\""); i_th2)
            | j2 =>
              (trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "  index th2: " ^ string_of_int j2);
@@ -303,7 +303,7 @@
 
 val REFL_THM = Thm.incr_indexes 2 @{lemma "t ~= t ==> False" by simp}
 
-val refl_x = cterm_of @{theory} (Var (hd (Term.add_vars (prop_of REFL_THM) [])));
+val refl_x = Thm.cterm_of @{theory} (Var (hd (Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of REFL_THM) [])));
 val refl_idx = 1 + Thm.maxidx_of REFL_THM;
 
 fun refl_inference ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab t =
@@ -374,8 +374,8 @@
       val imax = maxidx_of_term (i_tm $ tm_abs $ tm_subst)  (*ill-typed but gives right max*)
       val subst' = Thm.incr_indexes (imax+1) (if pos then subst_em else ssubst_em)
       val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "subst' " ^ Display.string_of_thm ctxt subst')
-      val eq_terms = map (apply2 (cterm_of thy))
-        (ListPair.zip (Misc_Legacy.term_vars (prop_of subst'), [tm_abs, tm_subst, i_tm]))
+      val eq_terms = map (apply2 (Thm.cterm_of thy))
+        (ListPair.zip (Misc_Legacy.term_vars (Thm.prop_of subst'), [tm_abs, tm_subst, i_tm]))
   in
     cterm_instantiate eq_terms subst'
   end
@@ -399,9 +399,9 @@
     [] => th
   | pairs =>
     let
-      val thy = theory_of_thm th
-      val cert = cterm_of thy
-      val certT = ctyp_of thy
+      val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm th
+      val cert = Thm.cterm_of thy
+      val certT = Thm.ctyp_of thy
       val (tyenv, tenv) = fold (Pattern.first_order_match thy) pairs (Vartab.empty, Vartab.empty)
 
       fun mkT (v, (S, T)) = (certT (TVar (v, S)), certT T)
@@ -429,13 +429,13 @@
   let
     val num_metis_lits =
       count is_metis_literal_genuine (Metis_LiteralSet.toList (Metis_Thm.clause fol_th))
-    val num_isabelle_lits = count is_isabelle_literal_genuine (prems_of th)
+    val num_isabelle_lits = count is_isabelle_literal_genuine (Thm.prems_of th)
   in
     if num_metis_lits >= num_isabelle_lits then
       th
     else
       let
-        val (prems0, concl) = th |> prop_of |> Logic.strip_horn
+        val (prems0, concl) = th |> Thm.prop_of |> Logic.strip_horn
         val prems = prems0 |> map normalize_literal |> distinct Term.aconv_untyped
         val goal = Logic.list_implies (prems, concl)
         val ctxt' = fold Thm.declare_hyps (#hyps (Thm.crep_thm th)) ctxt
@@ -454,7 +454,7 @@
 
 fun replay_one_inference ctxt type_enc concealed sym_tab (fol_th, inf)
                          th_pairs =
-  if not (null th_pairs) andalso prop_of (snd (hd th_pairs)) aconv @{prop False} then
+  if not (null th_pairs) andalso Thm.prop_of (snd (hd th_pairs)) aconv @{prop False} then
     (* Isabelle sometimes identifies literals (premises) that are distinct in
        Metis (e.g., because of type variables). We give the Isabelle proof the
        benefice of the doubt. *)
@@ -481,7 +481,7 @@
    where the nonvariables are goal parameters. *)
 fun unify_first_prem_with_concl thy i th =
   let
-    val goal = Logic.get_goal (prop_of th) i |> Envir.beta_eta_contract
+    val goal = Logic.get_goal (Thm.prop_of th) i |> Envir.beta_eta_contract
     val prem = goal |> Logic.strip_assums_hyp |> hd
     val concl = goal |> Logic.strip_assums_concl
 
@@ -522,7 +522,7 @@
       | _ => I)
 
     val t_inst =
-      [] |> try (unify_terms (prem, concl) #> map (apply2 (cterm_of thy)))
+      [] |> try (unify_terms (prem, concl) #> map (apply2 (Thm.cterm_of thy)))
          |> the_default [] (* FIXME *)
   in
     cterm_instantiate t_inst th
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
 
-    val params = Logic.strip_params (Logic.get_goal (prop_of st) i) |> rev
+    val params = Logic.strip_params (Logic.get_goal (Thm.prop_of st) i) |> rev
 
     fun repair (t as (Var ((s, _), _))) =
         (case find_index (fn (s', _) => s' = s) params of
@@ -561,7 +561,7 @@
     val t' = t |> repair |> fold (absdummy o snd) params
 
     fun do_instantiate th =
-      (case Term.add_vars (prop_of th) []
+      (case Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of th) []
             |> filter_out ((Meson_Clausify.is_zapped_var_name orf is_metis_fresh_variable) o fst
               o fst) of
         [] => th
@@ -576,8 +576,9 @@
             Envir.Envir {maxidx = Vartab.fold (Integer.max o snd o fst) tyenv 0,
               tenv = Vartab.empty, tyenv = tyenv}
           val ty_inst =
-            Vartab.fold (fn (x, (S, T)) => cons (apply2 (ctyp_of thy) (TVar (x, S), T))) tyenv []
-          val t_inst = [apply2 (cterm_of thy o Envir.norm_term env) (Var var, t')]
+            Vartab.fold (fn (x, (S, T)) => cons (apply2 (Thm.ctyp_of thy) (TVar (x, S), T)))
+              tyenv []
+          val t_inst = [apply2 (Thm.cterm_of thy o Envir.norm_term env) (Var var, t')]
         in
           Drule.instantiate_normalize (ty_inst, t_inst) th
         end
@@ -639,7 +640,7 @@
    specified axioms. The axioms have leading "All" and "Ex" quantifiers, which
    must be eliminated first. *)
 fun discharge_skolem_premises ctxt axioms prems_imp_false =
-  if prop_of prems_imp_false aconv @{prop False} then
+  if Thm.prop_of prems_imp_false aconv @{prop False} then
     prems_imp_false
   else
     let
@@ -685,7 +686,7 @@
             clusters_in_term true t |> cluster_no > 1 ? cons (ax_no, cluster_no - 1))
         | _ => raise TERM ("discharge_skolem_premises: Expected Var", [var]))
 
-      val prems = Logic.strip_imp_prems (prop_of prems_imp_false)
+      val prems = Logic.strip_imp_prems (Thm.prop_of prems_imp_false)
       val substs = prems |> map2 subst_info_of_prem (1 upto length prems)
                          |> sort (int_ord o apply2 fst)
       val depss = maps (map_filter deps_of_term_subst o snd o snd o snd) substs
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Metis/metis_tactic.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Metis/metis_tactic.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Metis/metis_tactic.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -33,7 +33,7 @@
 
 (* Designed to work also with monomorphic instances of polymorphic theorems. *)
 fun have_common_thm ths1 ths2 =
-  exists (member (Term.aconv_untyped o apply2 prop_of) ths1) (map Meson.make_meta_clause ths2)
+  exists (member (Term.aconv_untyped o apply2 Thm.prop_of) ths1) (map Meson.make_meta_clause ths2)
 
 (*Determining which axiom clauses are actually used*)
 fun used_axioms axioms (th, Metis_Proof.Axiom _) = SOME (lookth axioms th)
@@ -48,12 +48,12 @@
     (case hol_clause_of_metis ctxt type_enc sym_tab concealed mth of
       Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ _ $ t =>
       let
-        val ct = cterm_of thy t
-        val cT = ctyp_of_term ct
+        val ct = Thm.cterm_of thy t
+        val cT = Thm.ctyp_of_term ct
       in refl |> Drule.instantiate' [SOME cT] [SOME ct] end
     | Const (@{const_name disj}, _) $ t1 $ t2 =>
       (if can HOLogic.dest_not t1 then t2 else t1)
-      |> HOLogic.mk_Trueprop |> cterm_of thy |> Thm.trivial
+      |> HOLogic.mk_Trueprop |> Thm.cterm_of thy |> Thm.trivial
     | _ => raise Fail "expected reflexive or trivial clause")
   end
   |> Meson.make_meta_clause
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
     val tac = rewrite_goals_tac ctxt @{thms lambda_def [abs_def]} THEN resolve_tac ctxt [refl] 1
     val t = hol_clause_of_metis ctxt type_enc sym_tab concealed mth
-    val ct = cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop t)
+    val ct = Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop t)
   in Goal.prove_internal ctxt [] ct (K tac) |> Meson.make_meta_clause end
 
 fun add_vars_and_frees (t $ u) = fold (add_vars_and_frees) [t, u]
@@ -73,16 +73,16 @@
   | add_vars_and_frees _ = I
 
 fun introduce_lam_wrappers ctxt th =
-  if Meson_Clausify.is_quasi_lambda_free (prop_of th) then
+  if Meson_Clausify.is_quasi_lambda_free (Thm.prop_of th) then
     th
   else
     let
       val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
       fun conv first ctxt ct =
-        if Meson_Clausify.is_quasi_lambda_free (term_of ct) then
+        if Meson_Clausify.is_quasi_lambda_free (Thm.term_of ct) then
           Thm.reflexive ct
         else
-          (case term_of ct of
+          (case Thm.term_of ct of
             Abs (_, _, u) =>
             if first then
               (case add_vars_and_frees u [] of
@@ -90,18 +90,18 @@
                 Conv.abs_conv (conv false o snd) ctxt ct
                 |> (fn th => Meson.first_order_resolve th @{thm Metis.eq_lambdaI})
               | v :: _ =>
-                Abs (Name.uu, fastype_of v, abstract_over (v, term_of ct)) $ v
-                |> cterm_of thy
+                Abs (Name.uu, fastype_of v, abstract_over (v, Thm.term_of ct)) $ v
+                |> Thm.cterm_of thy
                 |> Conv.comb_conv (conv true ctxt))
             else
               Conv.abs_conv (conv false o snd) ctxt ct
           | Const (@{const_name Meson.skolem}, _) $ _ => Thm.reflexive ct
           | _ => Conv.comb_conv (conv true ctxt) ct)
-      val eq_th = conv true ctxt (cprop_of th)
+      val eq_th = conv true ctxt (Thm.cprop_of th)
       (* We replace the equation's left-hand side with a beta-equivalent term
          so that "Thm.equal_elim" works below. *)
-      val t0 $ _ $ t2 = prop_of eq_th
-      val eq_ct = t0 $ prop_of th $ t2 |> cterm_of thy
+      val t0 $ _ $ t2 = Thm.prop_of eq_th
+      val eq_ct = t0 $ Thm.prop_of th $ t2 |> Thm.cterm_of thy
       val eq_th' = Goal.prove_internal ctxt [] eq_ct (K (resolve_tac ctxt [eq_th] 1))
     in Thm.equal_elim eq_th' th end
 
@@ -189,7 +189,7 @@
            ("Falling back on " ^ quote (metis_call (hd fallback_type_encs) lam_trans) ^ "...");
        FOL_SOLVE unused fallback_type_encs lam_trans ctxt cls ths0)
   in
-    (case filter (fn t => prop_of t aconv @{prop False}) cls of
+    (case filter (fn t => Thm.prop_of t aconv @{prop False}) cls of
        false_th :: _ => [false_th RS @{thm FalseE}]
      | [] =>
      (case Metis_Resolution.loop (Metis_Resolution.new (resolution_params ordering)
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@
        Metis_Resolution.Contradiction mth =>
        let
          val _ = trace_msg ctxt (fn () => "METIS RECONSTRUCTION START: " ^ Metis_Thm.toString mth)
-         val ctxt' = fold Variable.declare_constraints (map prop_of cls) ctxt
+         val ctxt' = fold Variable.declare_constraints (map Thm.prop_of cls) ctxt
                       (*add constraints arising from converting goal to clause form*)
          val proof = Metis_Proof.proof mth
          val result = fold (replay_one_inference ctxt' type_enc concealed sym_tab) proof axioms
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@
 
 fun preskolem_tac ctxt st0 =
   (if exists (Meson.has_too_many_clauses ctxt)
-             (Logic.prems_of_goal (prop_of st0) 1) then
+             (Logic.prems_of_goal (Thm.prop_of st0) 1) then
      Simplifier.full_simp_tac (Meson_Clausify.ss_only @{thms not_all not_ex} ctxt) 1
      THEN CNF.cnfx_rewrite_tac ctxt 1
    else
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@
    prevent "Subgoal.FOCUS" from freezing the type variables. We don't do it for nonschematic facts
    "X" because this breaks a few proofs (in the rare and subtle case where a proof relied on
    extensionality not being applied) and brings few benefits. *)
-val has_tvar = exists_type (exists_subtype (fn TVar _ => true | _ => false)) o prop_of
+val has_tvar = exists_type (exists_subtype (fn TVar _ => true | _ => false)) o Thm.prop_of
 
 fun metis_method ((override_type_encs, lam_trans), ths) ctxt facts =
   let val (schem_facts, nonschem_facts) = List.partition has_tvar facts in
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Nitpick/nitpick.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Nitpick/nitpick.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Nitpick/nitpick.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -1065,14 +1065,14 @@
 fun pick_nits_in_subgoal state params mode i step =
   let
     val ctxt = Proof.context_of state
-    val t = state |> Proof.raw_goal |> #goal |> prop_of
+    val t = state |> Proof.raw_goal |> #goal |> Thm.prop_of
   in
     case Logic.count_prems t of
       0 => (writeln "No subgoal!"; (noneN, []))
     | n =>
       let
         val t = Logic.goal_params t i |> fst
-        val assms = map term_of (Assumption.all_assms_of ctxt)
+        val assms = map Thm.term_of (Assumption.all_assms_of ctxt)
         val (subst, assms, t) = extract_fixed_frees ctxt (assms, t)
       in pick_nits_in_term state params mode i n step subst [] assms t end
   end
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Nitpick/nitpick_hol.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Nitpick/nitpick_hol.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Nitpick/nitpick_hol.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -598,7 +598,7 @@
      {Rep, Abs_inverse, Rep_inverse, ...}) :: _ =>
     SOME {abs_type = Logic.varifyT_global abs_type,
           rep_type = Logic.varifyT_global rep_type, Abs_name = Abs_name,
-          Rep_name = Rep_name, prop_of_Rep = prop_of Rep,
+          Rep_name = Rep_name, prop_of_Rep = Thm.prop_of Rep,
           Abs_inverse = SOME Abs_inverse, Rep_inverse = SOME Rep_inverse}
   | _ => NONE
 
@@ -805,7 +805,7 @@
       val {qtyp, equiv_rel, equiv_thm, ...} =
         the (Quotient_Info.lookup_quotients thy s)
       val partial =
-        case prop_of equiv_thm of
+        case Thm.prop_of equiv_thm of
           @{const Trueprop} $ (Const (@{const_name equivp}, _) $ _) => false
         | @{const Trueprop} $ (Const (@{const_name part_equivp}, _) $ _) => true
         | _ => raise NOT_SUPPORTED "Ill-formed quotient type equivalence \
@@ -1349,7 +1349,7 @@
   in
     Theory.nodes_of thy
     |> maps Thm.axioms_of
-    |> map (apsnd (subst_atomic subst o prop_of))
+    |> map (apsnd (subst_atomic subst o Thm.prop_of))
     |> sort (fast_string_ord o apply2 fst)
     |> Ord_List.inter (fast_string_ord o apsnd fst) def_names
     |> map snd
@@ -1364,8 +1364,8 @@
   ctxt |> Spec_Rules.get
        |> filter (curry (op =) Spec_Rules.Unknown o fst)
        |> maps (snd o snd)
-       |> filter_out (is_built_in_theory o theory_of_thm)
-       |> map (subst_atomic subst o prop_of)
+       |> filter_out (is_built_in_theory o Thm.theory_of_thm)
+       |> map (subst_atomic subst o Thm.prop_of)
 
 fun arity_of_built_in_const (s, T) =
   if s = @{const_name If} then
@@ -1928,7 +1928,7 @@
 
 fun const_def_tables ctxt subst ts =
   (def_table_for
-    (map prop_of (rev (Named_Theorems.get ctxt @{named_theorems nitpick_unfold}))) subst,
+    (map Thm.prop_of (rev (Named_Theorems.get ctxt @{named_theorems nitpick_unfold}))) subst,
    fold (fn (s, t) => Symtab.map_default (s, []) (cons t))
         (map pair_for_prop ts) Symtab.empty)
 
@@ -1938,22 +1938,22 @@
   fold (append o paired_with_consts) ts [] |> AList.group (op =) |> Symtab.make
 
 fun const_simp_table ctxt =
-  def_table_for (map_filter (equationalize_term ctxt "nitpick_simp" o prop_of)
+  def_table_for (map_filter (equationalize_term ctxt "nitpick_simp" o Thm.prop_of)
     (rev (Named_Theorems.get ctxt @{named_theorems nitpick_simp})))
 
 fun const_psimp_table ctxt =
-  def_table_for (map_filter (equationalize_term ctxt "nitpick_psimp" o prop_of)
+  def_table_for (map_filter (equationalize_term ctxt "nitpick_psimp" o Thm.prop_of)
     (rev (Named_Theorems.get ctxt @{named_theorems nitpick_psimp})))
 
 fun const_choice_spec_table ctxt subst =
-  map (subst_atomic subst o prop_of)
+  map (subst_atomic subst o Thm.prop_of)
     (rev (Named_Theorems.get ctxt @{named_theorems nitpick_choice_spec}))
   |> const_nondef_table
 
 fun inductive_intro_table ctxt subst def_tables =
   let val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt in
     def_table_for
-        (maps (map (unfold_mutually_inductive_preds thy def_tables o prop_of)
+        (maps (map (unfold_mutually_inductive_preds thy def_tables o Thm.prop_of)
                o snd o snd)
          (filter (fn (cat, _) => cat = Spec_Rules.Inductive orelse
                                  cat = Spec_Rules.Co_Inductive) (Spec_Rules.get ctxt))) subst
@@ -1962,7 +1962,7 @@
 fun ground_theorem_table thy =
   fold ((fn @{const Trueprop} $ t1 =>
             is_ground_term t1 ? Inttab.map_default (hash_term t1, []) (cons t1)
-          | _ => I) o prop_of o snd) (Global_Theory.all_thms_of thy true) Inttab.empty
+          | _ => I) o Thm.prop_of o snd) (Global_Theory.all_thms_of thy true) Inttab.empty
 
 fun ersatz_table ctxt =
  #ersatz_table (Data.get (Context.Proof ctxt))
@@ -1979,7 +1979,7 @@
   in
     typedef_info ctxt (fst (dest_Type abs_T)) |> the
     |> pairf #Abs_inverse #Rep_inverse
-    |> apply2 (specialize_type thy x o prop_of o the)
+    |> apply2 (specialize_type thy x o Thm.prop_of o the)
     ||> single |> op ::
   end
 
@@ -2149,7 +2149,7 @@
            SOME wf => wf
          | NONE =>
            let
-             val goal = prop |> cterm_of thy |> Goal.init
+             val goal = prop |> Thm.cterm_of thy |> Goal.init
              val wf = exists (terminates_by ctxt tac_timeout goal)
                              termination_tacs
            in Synchronized.change cached_wf_props (cons (prop, wf)); wf end
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Nitpick/nitpick_model.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Nitpick/nitpick_model.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Nitpick/nitpick_model.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -1062,7 +1062,7 @@
             |> writeln
           else
             ()
-        val goal = prop |> cterm_of thy |> Goal.init
+        val goal = prop |> Thm.cterm_of thy |> Goal.init
       in
         (goal |> SINGLE (DETERM_TIMEOUT auto_timeout (auto_tac ctxt))
               |> the |> Goal.finish ctxt; true)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Nitpick/nitpick_preproc.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Nitpick/nitpick_preproc.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Nitpick/nitpick_preproc.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -1025,7 +1025,7 @@
       let
         val supers = Sign.complete_sort thy S
         val class_axioms =
-          maps (fn class => map prop_of (Axclass.get_info thy class |> #axioms
+          maps (fn class => map Thm.prop_of (Axclass.get_info thy class |> #axioms
                                          handle ERROR _ => [])) supers
         val monomorphic_class_axioms =
           map (fn t => case Term.add_tvars t [] of
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Nitpick/nitpick_util.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Nitpick/nitpick_util.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Nitpick/nitpick_util.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@
     let
       val (state, i, message) = f ()
       val ctxt = Proof.context_of state
-      val goal = Logic.get_goal (prop_of (#goal (Proof.goal state))) i
+      val goal = Logic.get_goal (Thm.prop_of (#goal (Proof.goal state))) i
       val hash = String.substring (SHA1.rep (SHA1.digest (hackish_string_of_term ctxt goal)), 0, 12)
     in
       File.append (Path.explode "$ISABELLE_HOME_USER/spy_nitpick")
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Old_Datatype/old_datatype.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Old_Datatype/old_datatype.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Old_Datatype/old_datatype.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 (** auxiliary **)
 
 val distinct_lemma = @{lemma "f x \<noteq> f y ==> x \<noteq> y" by iprover};
-val (_ $ (_ $ (_ $ (distinct_f $ _) $ _))) = hd (prems_of distinct_lemma);
+val (_ $ (_ $ (_ $ (distinct_f $ _) $ _))) = hd (Thm.prems_of distinct_lemma);
 
 fun exh_thm_of (dt_info : Old_Datatype_Aux.info Symtab.table) tname =
   #exhaust (the (Symtab.lookup dt_info tname));
@@ -246,10 +246,10 @@
     fun dt_constr_defs (((((_, (_, _, constrs)), tname), typedef: Typedef.info), T), constr_syntax)
         (thy, defs, eqns, rep_congs, dist_lemmas) =
       let
-        val _ $ (_ $ (cong_f $ _) $ _) = concl_of arg_cong;
-        val rep_const = cterm_of thy (Const (#Rep_name (#1 typedef), T --> Univ_elT));
-        val cong' = cterm_instantiate [(cterm_of thy cong_f, rep_const)] arg_cong;
-        val dist = cterm_instantiate [(cterm_of thy distinct_f, rep_const)] distinct_lemma;
+        val _ $ (_ $ (cong_f $ _) $ _) = Thm.concl_of arg_cong;
+        val rep_const = Thm.cterm_of thy (Const (#Rep_name (#1 typedef), T --> Univ_elT));
+        val cong' = cterm_instantiate [(Thm.cterm_of thy cong_f, rep_const)] arg_cong;
+        val dist = cterm_instantiate [(Thm.cterm_of thy distinct_f, rep_const)] distinct_lemma;
         val (thy', defs', eqns', _) =
           fold (make_constr_def typedef T (length constrs))
             (constrs ~~ constr_syntax) (Sign.add_path tname thy, defs, [], 1);
@@ -390,7 +390,7 @@
     (* prove  inj Rep_dt_i  and  Rep_dt_i x : rep_set_dt_i *)
 
     val fun_congs =
-      map (fn T => make_elim (Drule.instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of thy5 T)] [] fun_cong)) branchTs;
+      map (fn T => make_elim (Drule.instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of thy5 T)] [] fun_cong)) branchTs;
 
     fun prove_iso_thms ds (inj_thms, elem_thms) =
       let
@@ -609,7 +609,7 @@
     val (indrule_lemma_prems, indrule_lemma_concls) =
       split_list (map2 mk_indrule_lemma descr' recTs);
 
-    val cert = cterm_of thy6;
+    val cert = Thm.cterm_of thy6;
 
     val indrule_lemma =
       Goal.prove_sorry_global thy6 [] []
@@ -623,7 +623,7 @@
               [TRY (rtac conjI 1), resolve_tac ctxt Rep_inverse_thms 1,
                etac mp 1, resolve_tac ctxt iso_elem_thms 1])]);
 
-    val Ps = map head_of (HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of indrule_lemma)));
+    val Ps = map head_of (HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of indrule_lemma)));
     val frees =
       if length Ps = 1 then [Free ("P", snd (dest_Var (hd Ps)))]
       else map (Free o apfst fst o dest_Var) Ps;
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Old_Datatype/old_datatype_aux.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Old_Datatype/old_datatype_aux.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Old_Datatype/old_datatype_aux.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -126,9 +126,9 @@
 
 fun ind_tac indrule indnames = CSUBGOAL (fn (cgoal, i) =>
   let
-    val cert = cterm_of (Thm.theory_of_cterm cgoal);
-    val goal = term_of cgoal;
-    val ts = HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of indrule));
+    val cert = Thm.cterm_of (Thm.theory_of_cterm cgoal);
+    val goal = Thm.term_of cgoal;
+    val ts = HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of indrule));
     val ts' = HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_imp_concl goal));
     val getP =
       if can HOLogic.dest_imp (hd ts)
@@ -158,16 +158,18 @@
 fun exh_tac ctxt exh_thm_of = CSUBGOAL (fn (cgoal, i) =>
   let
     val thy = Thm.theory_of_cterm cgoal;
-    val goal = term_of cgoal;
+    val goal = Thm.term_of cgoal;
     val params = Logic.strip_params goal;
     val (_, Type (tname, _)) = hd (rev params);
     val exhaustion = Thm.lift_rule cgoal (exh_thm_of tname);
-    val prem' = hd (prems_of exhaustion);
+    val prem' = hd (Thm.prems_of exhaustion);
     val _ $ (_ $ lhs $ _) = hd (rev (Logic.strip_assums_hyp prem'));
     val exhaustion' =
-      cterm_instantiate [(cterm_of thy (head_of lhs),
-        cterm_of thy (fold_rev (fn (_, T) => fn t => Abs ("z", T, t)) params (Bound 0)))] exhaustion;
-  in compose_tac ctxt (false, exhaustion', nprems_of exhaustion) i end);
+      cterm_instantiate
+        [(Thm.cterm_of thy (head_of lhs),
+          Thm.cterm_of thy (fold_rev (fn (_, T) => fn t => Abs ("z", T, t)) params (Bound 0)))]
+        exhaustion;
+  in compose_tac ctxt (false, exhaustion', Thm.nprems_of exhaustion) i end);
 
 
 (********************** Internal description of datatypes *********************)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Old_Datatype/old_datatype_data.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Old_Datatype/old_datatype_data.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Old_Datatype/old_datatype_data.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -87,12 +87,12 @@
 val info_of_case = Symtab.lookup o #cases o Data.get;
 
 fun ctrs_of_exhaust exhaust =
-  Logic.strip_imp_prems (prop_of exhaust) |>
+  Logic.strip_imp_prems (Thm.prop_of exhaust) |>
   map (head_of o snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o the_single
     o Logic.strip_assums_hyp);
 
 fun case_of_case_rewrite case_rewrite =
-  head_of (fst (HOLogic.dest_eq (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (prop_of case_rewrite))));
+  head_of (fst (HOLogic.dest_eq (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.prop_of case_rewrite))));
 
 fun ctr_sugar_of_info ({exhaust, nchotomy, inject, distinct, case_rewrites, case_cong,
     case_cong_weak, split, split_asm, ...} : Old_Datatype_Aux.info) =
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Old_Datatype/old_rep_datatype.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Old_Datatype/old_rep_datatype.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Old_Datatype/old_rep_datatype.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -35,7 +35,8 @@
     val newTs = take (length (hd descr)) recTs;
 
     val maxidx = Thm.maxidx_of induct;
-    val induct_Ps = map head_of (HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of induct)));
+    val induct_Ps =
+      map head_of (HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of induct)));
 
     fun prove_casedist_thm (i, (T, t)) =
       let
@@ -45,7 +46,7 @@
           Abs ("z", T, HOLogic.imp $ HOLogic.mk_eq (Var (("a", maxidx + 1), T), Bound 0) $
             Var (("P", 0), HOLogic.boolT));
         val insts = take i dummyPs @ (P :: drop (i + 1) dummyPs);
-        val cert = cterm_of thy;
+        val cert = Thm.cterm_of thy;
         val insts' = map cert induct_Ps ~~ map cert insts;
         val induct' =
           refl RS
@@ -87,7 +88,8 @@
     val used = fold Term.add_tfree_namesT recTs [];
     val newTs = take (length (hd descr)) recTs;
 
-    val induct_Ps = map head_of (HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of induct)));
+    val induct_Ps =
+      map head_of (HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of induct)));
 
     val big_rec_name' = "rec_set_" ^ big_name;
     val rec_set_names' =
@@ -202,7 +204,7 @@
             Const (@{const_name Ex1}, (T2 --> HOLogic.boolT) --> HOLogic.boolT) $
               absfree ("y", T2) (set_t $ Old_Datatype_Aux.mk_Free "x" T1 i $ Free ("y", T2)))
                 (rec_sets ~~ recTs ~~ rec_result_Ts ~~ (1 upto length recTs));
-        val cert = cterm_of thy1;
+        val cert = Thm.cterm_of thy1;
         val insts =
           map (fn ((i, T), t) => absfree ("x" ^ string_of_int i, T) t)
             ((1 upto length recTs) ~~ recTs ~~ rec_unique_ts);
@@ -351,7 +353,7 @@
       map2 prove_cases newTs (Old_Datatype_Prop.make_cases case_names0 descr thy2);
 
     fun case_name_of (th :: _) =
-      fst (dest_Const (head_of (fst (HOLogic.dest_eq (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (prop_of th))))));
+      fst (dest_Const (head_of (fst (HOLogic.dest_eq (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.prop_of th))))));
 
     val case_names = map case_name_of case_thms;
   in
@@ -377,8 +379,8 @@
 
     fun prove_split_thms ((((((t1, t2), inject), dist_rewrites'), exhaustion), case_thms'), T) =
       let
-        val cert = cterm_of thy;
-        val _ $ (_ $ lhs $ _) = hd (Logic.strip_assums_hyp (hd (prems_of exhaustion)));
+        val cert = Thm.cterm_of thy;
+        val _ $ (_ $ lhs $ _) = hd (Logic.strip_assums_hyp (hd (Thm.prems_of exhaustion)));
         val exhaustion' = cterm_instantiate [(cert lhs, cert (Free ("x", T)))] exhaustion;
         fun tac ctxt =
           EVERY [resolve_tac ctxt [exhaustion'] 1,
@@ -448,9 +450,9 @@
       let
         val Const (@{const_name Pure.imp}, _) $ tm $ _ = t;
         val Const (@{const_name Trueprop}, _) $ (Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ _ $ Ma) = tm;
-        val cert = cterm_of thy;
+        val cert = Thm.cterm_of thy;
         val nchotomy' = nchotomy RS spec;
-        val [v] = Term.add_vars (concl_of nchotomy') [];
+        val [v] = Term.add_vars (Thm.concl_of nchotomy') [];
         val nchotomy'' = cterm_instantiate [(cert (Var v), cert Ma)] nchotomy';
       in
         Goal.prove_sorry_global thy [] (Logic.strip_imp_prems t) (Logic.strip_imp_concl t)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/code_prolog.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/code_prolog.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/code_prolog.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -319,7 +319,7 @@
 fun translate_intros ensure_groundness ctxt gr const constant_table =
   let
     val intros = map (preprocess_intro (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt)) (Graph.get_node gr const)
-    val (intros', ctxt') = Variable.import_terms true (map prop_of intros) ctxt
+    val (intros', ctxt') = Variable.import_terms true (map Thm.prop_of intros) ctxt
     val constant_table' = declare_consts (fold Term.add_const_names intros' []) constant_table
     fun translate_intro intro =
       let
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/core_data.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/core_data.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/core_data.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -235,7 +235,7 @@
         fun term_pair_of (ix, (ty, t)) = (Var (ix, ty), t)
         fun inst_of_matches tts =
           fold (Pattern.match thy) tts (Vartab.empty, Vartab.empty)
-          |> snd |> Vartab.dest |> map (apply2 (cterm_of thy) o term_pair_of)
+          |> snd |> Vartab.dest |> map (apply2 (Thm.cterm_of thy) o term_pair_of)
         val (cases, (eqs, prems1)) = apsnd (chop (nargs - nparams)) (chop n prems)
         val case_th =
           rewrite_rule ctxt2 (@{thm Predicate.eq_is_eq} :: map meta_eq_of eqs) (nth cases (i - 1))
@@ -247,8 +247,8 @@
           Thm.instantiate ([], inst_of_matches pats) case_th
             OF replicate nargs @{thm refl}
         val thesis =
-          Thm.instantiate ([], inst_of_matches (prems_of case_th' ~~ map prop_of prems2)) case_th'
-            OF prems2
+          Thm.instantiate ([], inst_of_matches (Thm.prems_of case_th' ~~ map Thm.prop_of prems2))
+            case_th' OF prems2
       in rtac thesis 1 end
   in
     Goal.prove ctxt (Term.add_free_names cases_rule []) [] cases_rule
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@
         val pos = Position.thread_data ()
         fun is_intro_of intro =
           let
-            val (const, _) = strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of intro))
+            val (const, _) = strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of intro))
           in (fst (dest_Const const) = name) end;
         val intros = map (preprocess_intro thy) (filter is_intro_of (#intrs result))
         val index = find_index (fn s => s = name) (#names (fst info))
@@ -330,7 +330,7 @@
 fun set_elim thm =
   let
     val (name, _) =
-      dest_Const (fst (strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (hd (prems_of thm)))))
+      dest_Const (fst (strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (hd (Thm.prems_of thm)))))
   in
     PredData.map (Graph.map_node name (map_pred_data (apsnd (apfst (apfst (apsnd (K (SOME thm))))))))
   end
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_aux.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_aux.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_aux.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -459,13 +459,13 @@
       (Const (@{const_name Trueprop}, _) $ (Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ _ $ _)) = true
   | is_equationlike_term _ = false
 
-val is_equationlike = is_equationlike_term o prop_of
+val is_equationlike = is_equationlike_term o Thm.prop_of
 
 fun is_pred_equation_term (Const (@{const_name Pure.eq}, _) $ u $ v) =
       (fastype_of u = @{typ bool}) andalso (fastype_of v = @{typ bool})
   | is_pred_equation_term _ = false
 
-val is_pred_equation = is_pred_equation_term o prop_of
+val is_pred_equation = is_pred_equation_term o Thm.prop_of
 
 fun is_intro_term constname t =
   the_default false (try (fn t =>
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@
       Const (c, _) => c = constname
     | _ => false) t)
 
-fun is_intro constname t = is_intro_term constname (prop_of t)
+fun is_intro constname t = is_intro_term constname (Thm.prop_of t)
 
 fun is_predT (T as Type("fun", [_, _])) = (body_type T = @{typ bool})
   | is_predT _ = false
@@ -528,7 +528,8 @@
     val t'' = Term.subst_bounds (rev vs, t');
   in ((ps', t''), nctxt') end
 
-val strip_intro_concl = strip_comb o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Logic.strip_imp_concl o prop_of
+val strip_intro_concl =
+  strip_comb o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Logic.strip_imp_concl o Thm.prop_of
 
 
 (* introduction rule combinators *)
@@ -610,7 +611,7 @@
 (* lifting term operations to theorems *)
 
 fun map_term thy f th =
-  Skip_Proof.make_thm thy (f (prop_of th))
+  Skip_Proof.make_thm thy (f (Thm.prop_of th))
 
 (*
 fun equals_conv lhs_cv rhs_cv ct =
@@ -860,23 +861,23 @@
   end
 
 fun dest_conjunct_prem th =
-  (case HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (prop_of th) of
+  (case HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.prop_of th) of
     (Const (@{const_name HOL.conj}, _) $ _ $ _) =>
-      dest_conjunct_prem (th RS @{thm conjunct1})
-        @ dest_conjunct_prem (th RS @{thm conjunct2})
-   | _ => [th])
+      dest_conjunct_prem (th RS @{thm conjunct1}) @
+      dest_conjunct_prem (th RS @{thm conjunct2})
+  | _ => [th])
 
 fun expand_tuples thy intro =
   let
     val ctxt = Proof_Context.init_global thy
     val (((T_insts, t_insts), [intro']), ctxt1) = Variable.import false [intro] ctxt
-    val intro_t = prop_of intro'
+    val intro_t = Thm.prop_of intro'
     val concl = Logic.strip_imp_concl intro_t
     val (_, args) = strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop concl)
     val (pats', intro_t', ctxt2) = rewrite_args args ([], intro_t, ctxt1)
     val (pats', _, ctxt3) = fold_atoms rewrite_prem intro_t' (pats', intro_t', ctxt2)
     fun rewrite_pat (ct1, ct2) =
-      (ct1, cterm_of thy (Pattern.rewrite_term thy pats' [] (term_of ct2)))
+      (ct1, Thm.cterm_of thy (Pattern.rewrite_term thy pats' [] (Thm.term_of ct2)))
     val t_insts' = map rewrite_pat t_insts
     val intro'' = Thm.instantiate (T_insts, t_insts') intro
     val [intro'''] = Variable.export ctxt3 ctxt [intro'']
@@ -939,7 +940,7 @@
   let
     val th = case_rewrite thy Tcon
     val ctxt = Proof_Context.init_global thy
-    val f = fst (strip_comb (fst (HOLogic.dest_eq (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (prop_of th)))))
+    val f = fst (strip_comb (fst (HOLogic.dest_eq (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.prop_of th)))))
     val Type ("fun", [uninst_T, uninst_T']) = fastype_of f
     val ([yname], ctxt') = Variable.add_fixes ["y"] ctxt
     val T' = TFree ("'t'", @{sort type})
@@ -1026,7 +1027,7 @@
 (* Some last processing *)
 
 fun remove_pointless_clauses intro =
-  if Logic.strip_imp_prems (prop_of intro) = [@{prop "False"}] then
+  if Logic.strip_imp_prems (Thm.prop_of intro) = [@{prop "False"}] then
     []
   else [intro]
 
@@ -1045,7 +1046,7 @@
       map_filter_premises (fn p => if p = @{prop True} then NONE else SOME p) intro_t
   in
     Option.map (Skip_Proof.make_thm thy)
-      (process_False (process_True (prop_of (process intro))))
+      (process_False (process_True (Thm.prop_of (process intro))))
   end
 
 
@@ -1089,7 +1090,7 @@
         fun instantiate_ho_args th =
           let
             val (_, args') =
-              (strip_comb o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Logic.strip_imp_concl o prop_of) th
+              (strip_comb o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Logic.strip_imp_concl o Thm.prop_of) th
             val ho_args' = map dest_Var (ho_args_of_typ T args')
           in Thm.certify_instantiate ([], ho_args' ~~ ho_args) th end
         val outp_pred =
@@ -1136,7 +1137,7 @@
     val (((pred, params), intros_th), ctxt1) = import_intros pred introrules ctxt
     (* TODO: distinct required ? -- test case with more than one parameter! *)
     val params = distinct (op aconv) params
-    val intros = map prop_of intros_th
+    val intros = map Thm.prop_of intros_th
     val ([propname], ctxt2) = Variable.variant_fixes ["thesis"] ctxt1
     val prop = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (Free (propname, HOLogic.boolT))
     val argsT = binder_types (fastype_of pred)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_core.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_core.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_core.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -1226,7 +1226,7 @@
 fun prepare_intrs options ctxt prednames intros =
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
-    val intrs = map prop_of intros
+    val intrs = map Thm.prop_of intros
     val preds = map (fn c => Const (c, Sign.the_const_type thy c)) prednames
     val (preds, intrs) = unify_consts thy preds intrs
     val ([preds, intrs], _) = fold_burrow (Variable.import_terms false) [preds, intrs] ctxt
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_data.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_data.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_data.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -72,17 +72,17 @@
     | _ => raise TERM ("defining_const_of_introrule_term failed: Not a constant", [t])
   end
 *)
-val defining_term_of_introrule = defining_term_of_introrule_term o prop_of
+val defining_term_of_introrule = defining_term_of_introrule_term o Thm.prop_of
 
 fun defining_const_of_introrule th =
   (case defining_term_of_introrule th of
     Const (c, _) => c
-  | _ => raise TERM ("defining_const_of_introrule failed: Not a constant", [prop_of th]))
+  | _ => raise TERM ("defining_const_of_introrule failed: Not a constant", [Thm.prop_of th]))
 
 (*TODO*)
 fun is_introlike_term _ = true
 
-val is_introlike = is_introlike_term o prop_of
+val is_introlike = is_introlike_term o Thm.prop_of
 
 fun check_equation_format_term (t as (Const (@{const_name Pure.eq}, _) $ u $ _)) =
       (case strip_comb u of
@@ -95,19 +95,19 @@
   | check_equation_format_term t =
       raise TERM ("check_equation_format_term failed: Not an equation", [t])
 
-val check_equation_format = check_equation_format_term o prop_of
+val check_equation_format = check_equation_format_term o Thm.prop_of
 
 
 fun defining_term_of_equation_term (Const (@{const_name Pure.eq}, _) $ u $ _) = fst (strip_comb u)
   | defining_term_of_equation_term t =
       raise TERM ("defining_const_of_equation_term failed: Not an equation", [t])
 
-val defining_term_of_equation = defining_term_of_equation_term o prop_of
+val defining_term_of_equation = defining_term_of_equation_term o Thm.prop_of
 
 fun defining_const_of_equation th =
   (case defining_term_of_equation th of
     Const (c, _) => c
-  | _ => raise TERM ("defining_const_of_equation failed: Not a constant", [prop_of th]))
+  | _ => raise TERM ("defining_const_of_equation failed: Not a constant", [Thm.prop_of th]))
 
 
 
@@ -115,7 +115,7 @@
 (* Normalizing equations *)
 
 fun mk_meta_equation th =
-  (case prop_of th of
+  (case Thm.prop_of th of
     Const (@{const_name Trueprop}, _) $ (Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ _ $ _) =>
       th RS @{thm eq_reflection}
   | _ => th)
@@ -124,7 +124,7 @@
 
 fun full_fun_cong_expand th =
   let
-    val (f, args) = strip_comb (fst (Logic.dest_equals (prop_of th)))
+    val (f, args) = strip_comb (fst (Logic.dest_equals (Thm.prop_of th)))
     val i = length (binder_types (fastype_of f)) - length args
   in funpow i (fn th => th RS meta_fun_cong) th end;
 
@@ -137,7 +137,7 @@
   let
     val ctxt = Proof_Context.init_global thy  (* FIXME proper context!? *)
     val ((_, [th']), _) = Variable.import true [th] ctxt
-    val t = prop_of th'
+    val t = Thm.prop_of th'
     val frees = Term.add_frees t []
     val freenames = Term.add_free_names t []
     val nctxt = Name.make_context freenames
@@ -269,7 +269,7 @@
         Type (Tcon, _) => can (Ctr_Sugar.dest_ctr ctxt Tcon) (Const x)
       | _ => false)
     fun defiants_of specs =
-      fold (Term.add_consts o prop_of) specs []
+      fold (Term.add_consts o Thm.prop_of) specs []
       |> filter_out is_datatype_constructor
       |> filter_out is_nondefining_const
       |> filter_out has_code_pred_intros
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_fun.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_fun.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_fun.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -169,7 +169,7 @@
           SOME raw_split_thm =>
           let
             val split_thm = prepare_split_thm (Proof_Context.init_global thy) raw_split_thm
-            val (assms, concl) = Logic.strip_horn (prop_of split_thm)
+            val (assms, concl) = Logic.strip_horn (Thm.prop_of split_thm)
             val (_, [split_t]) = strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop concl)
             val t' = case_betapply thy t
             val subst = Pattern.match thy (split_t, t') (Vartab.empty, Vartab.empty)
@@ -311,7 +311,7 @@
   let
     fun lookup_pred t = lookup thy (Fun_Pred.get thy) t
     (*val _ = tracing ("Rewriting intro " ^ Display.string_of_thm_global thy intro)*)
-    val intro_t = Logic.unvarify_global (prop_of intro)
+    val intro_t = Logic.unvarify_global (Thm.prop_of intro)
     val (prems, concl) = Logic.strip_horn intro_t
     val frees = map fst (Term.add_frees intro_t [])
     fun rewrite prem names =
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_pred.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_pred.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_pred.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -36,7 +36,7 @@
       (* TODO: contextify things - this line is to unvarify the split_thm *)
       (*val ((_, [isplit_thm]), _) =
         Variable.import true [split_thm] (Proof_Context.init_global thy)*)
-      val (assms, concl) = Logic.strip_horn (prop_of split_thm)
+      val (assms, concl) = Logic.strip_horn (Thm.prop_of split_thm)
       val (_, [split_t]) = strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop concl) 
       val atom' = case_betapply thy atom
       val subst = Pattern.match thy (split_t, atom') (Vartab.empty, Vartab.empty)
@@ -132,7 +132,7 @@
     val ctxt = Proof_Context.init_global thy  (* FIXME proper context!? *)
     val ((_, intros), ctxt') = Variable.import true intros ctxt
     val (intros', (local_defs, thy')) = (fold_map o fold_map_atoms)
-      (flatten constname) (map prop_of intros) ([], thy)
+      (flatten constname) (map Thm.prop_of intros) ([], thy)
     val ctxt'' = Proof_Context.transfer thy' ctxt'
     val intros'' =
       map (fn t => Goal.prove ctxt'' [] [] t (fn _ => ALLGOALS (Skip_Proof.cheat_tac ctxt''))) intros'
@@ -147,7 +147,7 @@
     val ((_, ths'), ctxt') = Variable.import true ths ctxt
     fun introrulify' th =
       let
-        val (lhs, rhs) = Logic.dest_equals (prop_of th)
+        val (lhs, rhs) = Logic.dest_equals (Thm.prop_of th)
         val frees = Term.add_free_names rhs []
         val disjuncts = HOLogic.dest_disj rhs
         val nctxt = Name.make_context frees
@@ -158,14 +158,14 @@
           in
             (ps, Logic.list_implies (prems, HOLogic.mk_Trueprop lhs))
           end
-        val x = ((cterm_of thy) o the_single o snd o strip_comb o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o fst o
-          Logic.dest_implies o prop_of) @{thm exI}
+        val x = (Thm.cterm_of thy o the_single o snd o strip_comb o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o fst o
+          Logic.dest_implies o Thm.prop_of) @{thm exI}
         fun prove_introrule (index, (ps, introrule)) =
           let
             val tac = Simplifier.simp_tac (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt' addsimps [th]) 1
               THEN Inductive.select_disj_tac ctxt' (length disjuncts) (index + 1) 1
               THEN (EVERY (map (fn y =>
-                rtac (Drule.cterm_instantiate [(x, cterm_of thy (Free y))] @{thm exI}) 1) ps))
+                rtac (Drule.cterm_instantiate [(x, Thm.cterm_of thy (Free y))] @{thm exI}) 1) ps))
               THEN REPEAT_DETERM (rtac @{thm conjI} 1 THEN assume_tac ctxt' 1)
               THEN TRY (assume_tac ctxt' 1)
           in
@@ -270,9 +270,9 @@
     fun flat_intro intro (new_defs, thy) =
       let
         val constname = fst (dest_Const (fst (strip_comb
-          (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_imp_concl (prop_of intro))))))
+          (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_imp_concl (Thm.prop_of intro))))))
         val (intro_ts, (new_defs, thy)) =
-          fold_map_atoms (process constname) (prop_of intro) (new_defs, thy)
+          fold_map_atoms (process constname) (Thm.prop_of intro) (new_defs, thy)
         val th = Skip_Proof.make_thm thy intro_ts
       in
         (th, (new_defs, thy))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_proof.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_proof.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_proof.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -108,10 +108,10 @@
       THEN Subgoal.FOCUS_PREMS (fn {context = ctxt', prems, concl, ...} =>
           let
             val param_prem = nth prems premposition
-            val (param, _) = strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (prop_of param_prem))
+            val (param, _) = strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.prop_of param_prem))
             val prems' = maps dest_conjunct_prem (take nargs prems)
             fun param_rewrite prem =
-              param = snd (HOLogic.dest_eq (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (prop_of prem)))
+              param = snd (HOLogic.dest_eq (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.prop_of prem)))
             val SOME rew_eq = find_first param_rewrite prems'
             val param_prem' = rewrite_rule ctxt'
               (map (fn th => th RS @{thm eq_reflection})
@@ -122,7 +122,7 @@
           end) ctxt 1
       THEN trace_tac ctxt options "after prove parameter call")
 
-fun SOLVED tac st = FILTER (fn st' => nprems_of st' = nprems_of st - 1) tac st
+fun SOLVED tac st = FILTER (fn st' => Thm.nprems_of st' = Thm.nprems_of st - 1) tac st
 
 fun prove_match options ctxt nargs out_ts =
   let
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_specialisation.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_specialisation.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Predicate_Compile/predicate_compile_specialisation.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -31,7 +31,7 @@
   let
     val ((_, intros'), ctxt') = Variable.importT intros ctxt
     val pred' =
-      fst (strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_imp_concl (prop_of (hd intros')))))
+      fst (strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_imp_concl (Thm.prop_of (hd intros')))))
     val Ts = binder_types (fastype_of pred')
     val argTs = map fastype_of args
     val Tsubst = Type.raw_matches (argTs, Ts) Vartab.empty
@@ -61,8 +61,8 @@
 fun specialise_intros black_list (pred, intros) pats thy =
   let
     val ctxt = Proof_Context.init_global thy
-    val maxidx = fold (Term.maxidx_term o prop_of) intros ~1
-    val pats = map (Logic.incr_indexes ([],  maxidx + 1)) pats
+    val maxidx = fold (Term.maxidx_term o Thm.prop_of) intros ~1
+    val pats = map (Logic.incr_indexes ([], maxidx + 1)) pats
     val (((pred, intros), pats), ctxt') = import (pred, intros) pats ctxt
     val result_pats = map Var (fold_rev Term.add_vars pats [])
     fun mk_fresh_name names =
@@ -82,7 +82,7 @@
     val specialised_const = Const (constname, constT)
     fun specialise_intro intro =
       (let
-        val (prems, concl) = Logic.strip_horn (prop_of intro)
+        val (prems, concl) = Logic.strip_horn (Thm.prop_of intro)
         val env = Pattern.unify (Context.Theory thy)
           (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (list_comb (pred, pats)), concl) (Envir.empty 0)
         val prems = map (Envir.norm_term env) prems
@@ -201,7 +201,7 @@
       let
         (* FIXME: only necessary because of sloppy Logic.unvarify in restrict_pattern *)
         val intros = Drule.zero_var_indexes_list intros
-        val (intros_t', thy') = (fold_map o fold_map_atoms) detect' (map prop_of intros) thy
+        val (intros_t', thy') = (fold_map o fold_map_atoms) detect' (map Thm.prop_of intros) thy
       in
         ((constname, map (Skip_Proof.make_thm thy') intros_t'), thy')
       end
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/cooper.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/cooper.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/cooper.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -122,22 +122,22 @@
             | Dvd of cterm*cterm | NDvd of cterm*cterm | Nox
 
 fun whatis x ct =
-( case (term_of ct) of
+( case Thm.term_of ct of
   Const(@{const_name HOL.conj},_)$_$_ => And (Thm.dest_binop ct)
 | Const (@{const_name HOL.disj},_)$_$_ => Or (Thm.dest_binop ct)
-| Const (@{const_name HOL.eq},_)$y$_ => if term_of x aconv y then Eq (Thm.dest_arg ct) else Nox
+| Const (@{const_name HOL.eq},_)$y$_ => if Thm.term_of x aconv y then Eq (Thm.dest_arg ct) else Nox
 | Const (@{const_name Not},_) $ (Const (@{const_name HOL.eq},_)$y$_) =>
-  if term_of x aconv y then NEq (funpow 2 Thm.dest_arg ct) else Nox
+  if Thm.term_of x aconv y then NEq (funpow 2 Thm.dest_arg ct) else Nox
 | Const (@{const_name Orderings.less}, _) $ y$ z =>
-   if term_of x aconv y then Lt (Thm.dest_arg ct)
-   else if term_of x aconv z then Gt (Thm.dest_arg1 ct) else Nox
+   if Thm.term_of x aconv y then Lt (Thm.dest_arg ct)
+   else if Thm.term_of x aconv z then Gt (Thm.dest_arg1 ct) else Nox
 | Const (@{const_name Orderings.less_eq}, _) $ y $ z =>
-   if term_of x aconv y then Le (Thm.dest_arg ct)
-   else if term_of x aconv z then Ge (Thm.dest_arg1 ct) else Nox
+   if Thm.term_of x aconv y then Le (Thm.dest_arg ct)
+   else if Thm.term_of x aconv z then Ge (Thm.dest_arg1 ct) else Nox
 | Const (@{const_name Rings.dvd},_)$_$(Const(@{const_name Groups.plus},_)$y$_) =>
-   if term_of x aconv y then Dvd (Thm.dest_binop ct ||> Thm.dest_arg) else Nox
+   if Thm.term_of x aconv y then Dvd (Thm.dest_binop ct ||> Thm.dest_arg) else Nox
 | Const (@{const_name Not},_) $ (Const (@{const_name Rings.dvd},_)$_$(Const(@{const_name Groups.plus},_)$y$_)) =>
-   if term_of x aconv y then
+   if Thm.term_of x aconv y then
    NDvd (Thm.dest_binop (Thm.dest_arg ct) ||> Thm.dest_arg) else Nox
 | _ => Nox)
   handle CTERM _ => Nox;
@@ -148,7 +148,7 @@
         (Thm.dest_arg t)
 in (Thm.lambda x o Thm.dest_arg o Thm.dest_arg) eq end;
 
-val get_pmi = get_pmi_term o cprop_of;
+val get_pmi = get_pmi_term o Thm.cprop_of;
 
 val p_v' = @{cpat "?P' :: int => bool"};
 val q_v' = @{cpat "?Q' :: int => bool"};
@@ -174,7 +174,7 @@
 val cmulC =  @{cterm "op * :: int => _"}
 val cminus =  @{cterm "op - :: int => _"}
 val cone =  @{cterm "1 :: int"}
-val [addC, mulC, subC] = map term_of [cadd, cmulC, cminus]
+val [addC, mulC, subC] = map Thm.term_of [cadd, cmulC, cminus]
 val [zero, one] = [@{term "0 :: int"}, @{term "1 :: int"}];
 
 fun numeral1 f n = HOLogic.mk_number iT (f (dest_number n));
@@ -294,7 +294,7 @@
   | lin vs fm = fm;
 
 fun lint_conv ctxt vs ct =
-let val t = term_of ct
+let val t = Thm.term_of ct
 in (provelin ctxt ((HOLogic.eq_const iT)$t$(lint vs t) |> HOLogic.mk_Trueprop))
              RS eq_reflection
 end;
@@ -305,18 +305,18 @@
   | is_intrel (@{term "Not"}$(b$_$_)) = is_intrel_type (fastype_of b)
   | is_intrel _ = false;
 
-fun linearize_conv ctxt vs ct = case term_of ct of
+fun linearize_conv ctxt vs ct = case Thm.term_of ct of
   Const(@{const_name Rings.dvd},_)$_$_ =>
   let
     val th = Conv.binop_conv (lint_conv ctxt vs) ct
     val (d',t') = Thm.dest_binop (Thm.rhs_of th)
-    val (dt',tt') = (term_of d', term_of t')
+    val (dt',tt') = (Thm.term_of d', Thm.term_of t')
   in if is_number dt' andalso is_number tt'
      then Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Simplifier.rewrite (put_simpset presburger_ss ctxt))) th
      else
      let
        val dth =
-         case perhaps_number (term_of d') of
+         case perhaps_number (Thm.term_of d') of
            SOME d => if d < 0 then
              (Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.arg_conv (Conv.arg1_conv (lint_conv ctxt vs)))
                               (Thm.transitive th (inst' [d',t'] dvd_uminus))
@@ -345,10 +345,10 @@
 fun unify ctxt q =
  let
   val (e,(cx,p)) = q |> Thm.dest_comb ||> Thm.dest_abs NONE
-  val x = term_of cx
+  val x = Thm.term_of cx
   val ins = insert (op = : int * int -> bool)
   fun h (acc,dacc) t =
-   case (term_of t) of
+   case Thm.term_of t of
     Const(s,_)$(Const(@{const_name Groups.times},_)$c$y)$ _ =>
     if x aconv y andalso member (op =)
       [@{const_name HOL.eq}, @{const_name Orderings.less}, @{const_name Orderings.less_eq}] s
@@ -366,7 +366,7 @@
   val (cs,ds) = h ([],[]) p
   val l = Integer.lcms (union (op =) cs ds)
   fun cv k ct =
-    let val (tm as b$s$t) = term_of ct
+    let val (tm as b$s$t) = Thm.term_of ct
     in ((HOLogic.eq_const bT)$tm$(b$(linear_cmul k s)$(linear_cmul k t))
          |> HOLogic.mk_Trueprop |> provelin ctxt) RS eq_reflection end
   fun nzprop x =
@@ -381,13 +381,13 @@
     let val tab = fold Inttab.update
           (ds ~~ (map (fn x => nzprop (l div x)) ds)) Inttab.empty
     in
-      fn ct => the (Inttab.lookup tab (ct |> term_of |> dest_number))
+      fn ct => the (Inttab.lookup tab (ct |> Thm.term_of |> dest_number))
         handle Option.Option =>
           (writeln ("noz: Theorems-Table contains no entry for " ^
               Syntax.string_of_term ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)); raise Option.Option)
     end
   fun unit_conv t =
-   case (term_of t) of
+   case Thm.term_of t of
    Const(@{const_name HOL.conj},_)$_$_ => Conv.binop_conv unit_conv t
   | Const(@{const_name HOL.disj},_)$_$_ => Conv.binop_conv unit_conv t
   | Const (@{const_name Not},_)$_ => Conv.arg_conv unit_conv t
@@ -420,8 +420,8 @@
   val th = Drule.arg_cong_rule e (Thm.abstract_rule (fst (dest_Free x )) cx uth)
   val th' = inst' [Thm.lambda ltx (Thm.rhs_of uth), clt] unity_coeff_ex
   val thf = Thm.transitive th
-      (Thm.transitive (Thm.symmetric (Thm.beta_conversion true (cprop_of th' |> Thm.dest_arg1))) th')
-  val (lth,rth) = Thm.dest_comb (cprop_of thf) |>> Thm.dest_arg |>> Thm.beta_conversion true
+      (Thm.transitive (Thm.symmetric (Thm.beta_conversion true (Thm.cprop_of th' |> Thm.dest_arg1))) th')
+  val (lth,rth) = Thm.dest_comb (Thm.cprop_of thf) |>> Thm.dest_arg |>> Thm.beta_conversion true
                   ||> Thm.beta_conversion true |>> Thm.symmetric
  in Thm.transitive (Thm.transitive lth thf) rth end;
 
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@
 val insert_tm = @{cterm "insert :: int => _"};
 fun mkISet cts = fold_rev (Thm.apply insert_tm #> Thm.apply) cts emptyIS;
 val eqelem_imp_imp = @{thm eqelem_imp_iff} RS iffD1;
-val [A_tm,B_tm] = map (fn th => cprop_of th |> funpow 2 Thm.dest_arg |> Thm.dest_abs NONE |> snd |> Thm.dest_arg1 |> Thm.dest_arg
+val [A_tm,B_tm] = map (fn th => Thm.cprop_of th |> funpow 2 Thm.dest_arg |> Thm.dest_abs NONE |> snd |> Thm.dest_arg1 |> Thm.dest_arg
                                       |> Thm.dest_abs NONE |> snd |> Thm.dest_fun |> Thm.dest_arg)
                       [asetP,bsetP];
 
@@ -454,8 +454,8 @@
   | Le t => (bacc, ins (plus1 t) aacc,dacc)
   | Gt t => (ins t bacc, aacc,dacc)
   | Ge t => (ins (minus1 t) bacc, aacc,dacc)
-  | Dvd (d,_) => (bacc,aacc,insert (op =) (term_of d |> dest_number) dacc)
-  | NDvd (d,_) => (bacc,aacc,insert (op =) (term_of d|> dest_number) dacc)
+  | Dvd (d,_) => (bacc,aacc,insert (op =) (Thm.term_of d |> dest_number) dacc)
+  | NDvd (d,_) => (bacc,aacc,insert (op =) (Thm.term_of d|> dest_number) dacc)
   | _ => (bacc, aacc, dacc)
  val (b0,a0,ds) = h p ([],[],[])
  val d = Integer.lcms ds
@@ -469,7 +469,7 @@
    in Thm.equal_elim (Thm.symmetric th) TrueI end;
  val dvd =
    let val tab = fold Inttab.update (ds ~~ (map divprop ds)) Inttab.empty in
-     fn ct => the (Inttab.lookup tab (term_of ct |> dest_number))
+     fn ct => the (Inttab.lookup tab (Thm.term_of ct |> dest_number))
        handle Option.Option =>
         (writeln ("dvd: Theorems-Table contains no entry for" ^
             Syntax.string_of_term ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)); raise Option.Option)
@@ -485,18 +485,18 @@
      val insI2 = instantiate' [SOME @{ctyp "int"}] [] @{thm "insertI2"}
    in
     fun provein x S =
-     case term_of S of
+     case Thm.term_of S of
         Const(@{const_name Orderings.bot}, _) => error "Unexpected error in Cooper, please email Amine Chaieb"
       | Const(@{const_name insert}, _) $ y $ _ =>
          let val (cy,S') = Thm.dest_binop S
-         in if term_of x aconv y then instantiate' [] [SOME x, SOME S'] insI1
+         in if Thm.term_of x aconv y then instantiate' [] [SOME x, SOME S'] insI1
          else Thm.implies_elim (instantiate' [] [SOME x, SOME S', SOME cy] insI2)
                            (provein x S')
          end
    end
 
- val al = map (lint vs o term_of) a0
- val bl = map (lint vs o term_of) b0
+ val al = map (lint vs o Thm.term_of) a0
+ val bl = map (lint vs o Thm.term_of) b0
  val (sl,s0,f,abths,cpth) =
    if length (distinct (op aconv) bl) <= length (distinct (op aconv) al)
    then
@@ -516,29 +516,29 @@
  val cpth =
   let
    val sths = map (fn (tl,t0) =>
-                      if tl = term_of t0
+                      if tl = Thm.term_of t0
                       then instantiate' [SOME @{ctyp "int"}] [SOME t0] refl
-                      else provelin ctxt ((HOLogic.eq_const iT)$tl$(term_of t0)
+                      else provelin ctxt ((HOLogic.eq_const iT)$tl$(Thm.term_of t0)
                                  |> HOLogic.mk_Trueprop))
                    (sl ~~ s0)
-   val csl = distinct (op aconvc) (map (cprop_of #> Thm.dest_arg #> Thm.dest_arg1) sths)
+   val csl = distinct (op aconvc) (map (Thm.cprop_of #> Thm.dest_arg #> Thm.dest_arg1) sths)
    val S = mkISet csl
-   val inStab = fold (fn ct => fn tab => Termtab.update (term_of ct, provein ct S) tab)
+   val inStab = fold (fn ct => fn tab => Termtab.update (Thm.term_of ct, provein ct S) tab)
                     csl Termtab.empty
    val eqelem_th = instantiate' [SOME @{ctyp "int"}] [NONE,NONE, SOME S] eqelem_imp_imp
    val inS =
      let
       val tab = fold Termtab.update
         (map (fn eq =>
-                let val (s,t) = cprop_of eq |> Thm.dest_arg |> Thm.dest_binop
-                    val th = if term_of s = term_of t
-                             then the (Termtab.lookup inStab (term_of s))
+                let val (s,t) = Thm.cprop_of eq |> Thm.dest_arg |> Thm.dest_binop
+                    val th = if Thm.term_of s = Thm.term_of t  (* FIXME equality? *)
+                             then the (Termtab.lookup inStab (Thm.term_of s))
                              else FWD (instantiate' [] [SOME s, SOME t] eqelem_th)
-                                [eq, the (Termtab.lookup inStab (term_of s))]
-                 in (term_of t, th) end)
+                                [eq, the (Termtab.lookup inStab (Thm.term_of s))]
+                 in (Thm.term_of t, th) end)
                   sths) Termtab.empty
         in
-          fn ct => the (Termtab.lookup tab (term_of ct))
+          fn ct => the (Termtab.lookup tab (Thm.term_of ct))
             handle Option.Option =>
               (writeln ("inS: No theorem for " ^ Syntax.string_of_term ctxt (Thm.term_of ct));
                 raise Option.Option)
@@ -552,7 +552,7 @@
 
 fun literals_conv bops uops env cv =
  let fun h t =
-  case (term_of t) of
+  case Thm.term_of t of
    b$_$_ => if member (op aconv) bops b then Conv.binop_conv h t else cv env t
  | u$_ => if member (op aconv) uops u then Conv.arg_conv h t else cv env t
  | _ => cv env t
@@ -571,7 +571,7 @@
     (Simplifier.rewrite (put_simpset conv_ss ctxt))
     (Simplifier.rewrite (put_simpset presburger_ss ctxt))
     (Simplifier.rewrite (put_simpset conv_ss ctxt))
-    (cons o term_of) (Misc_Legacy.term_frees (term_of p))
+    (cons o Thm.term_of) (Misc_Legacy.term_frees (Thm.term_of p))
     (linearize_conv ctxt) (integer_nnf_conv ctxt)
     (cooperex_conv ctxt) p
   handle CTERM _ => raise COOPER "bad cterm"
@@ -708,7 +708,7 @@
   | _ => [ct]);
 
 fun strip_objall ct = 
- case term_of ct of 
+ case Thm.term_of ct of 
   Const (@{const_name All}, _) $ Abs (xn,_,_) => 
    let val (a,(v,t')) = (apsnd (Thm.dest_abs (SOME xn)) o Thm.dest_comb) ct
    in apfst (cons (a,v)) (strip_objall t')
@@ -760,13 +760,14 @@
  | _ => is_number t orelse can HOLogic.dest_nat t
 
  fun ty cts t = 
- if not (member (op =) [HOLogic.intT, HOLogic.natT, HOLogic.boolT] (typ_of (ctyp_of_term t))) then false 
-    else case term_of t of 
-      c$l$r => if member (op =) [@{term"op *::int => _"}, @{term"op *::nat => _"}] c
-               then not (isnum l orelse isnum r)
-               else not (member (op aconv) cts c)
-    | c$_ => not (member (op aconv) cts c)
-    | c => not (member (op aconv) cts c)
+  if not (member (op =) [HOLogic.intT, HOLogic.natT, HOLogic.boolT] (Thm.typ_of (Thm.ctyp_of_term t)))
+  then false 
+  else case Thm.term_of t of 
+    c$l$r => if member (op =) [@{term"op *::int => _"}, @{term"op *::nat => _"}] c
+             then not (isnum l orelse isnum r)
+             else not (member (op aconv) cts c)
+  | c$_ => not (member (op aconv) cts c)
+  | c => not (member (op aconv) cts c)
 
  val term_constants =
   let fun h acc t = case t of
@@ -777,15 +778,19 @@
  in h [] end;
 in 
 fun is_relevant ctxt ct = 
- subset (op aconv) (term_constants (term_of ct) , snd (get ctxt))
- andalso forall (fn Free (_,T) => member (op =) [@{typ int}, @{typ nat}] T) (Misc_Legacy.term_frees (term_of ct))
- andalso forall (fn Var (_,T) => member (op =) [@{typ int}, @{typ nat}] T) (Misc_Legacy.term_vars (term_of ct));
+ subset (op aconv) (term_constants (Thm.term_of ct), snd (get ctxt))
+ andalso
+  forall (fn Free (_, T) => member (op =) [@{typ int}, @{typ nat}] T)
+    (Misc_Legacy.term_frees (Thm.term_of ct))
+ andalso
+  forall (fn Var (_, T) => member (op =) [@{typ int}, @{typ nat}] T)
+    (Misc_Legacy.term_vars (Thm.term_of ct));
 
 fun int_nat_terms ctxt ct =
  let 
   val cts = snd (get ctxt)
   fun h acc t = if ty cts t then insert (op aconvc) t acc else
-   case (term_of t) of
+   case Thm.term_of t of
     _$_ => h (h acc (Thm.dest_arg t)) (Thm.dest_fun t)
   | Abs(_,_,_) => Thm.dest_abs NONE t ||> h acc |> uncurry (remove (op aconvc))
   | _ => acc
@@ -795,8 +800,8 @@
 fun generalize_tac f = CSUBGOAL (fn (p, _) => PRIMITIVE (fn st =>
  let 
    fun all T = Drule.cterm_rule (instantiate' [SOME T] []) @{cpat "Pure.all"}
-   fun gen x t = Thm.apply (all (ctyp_of_term x)) (Thm.lambda x t)
-   val ts = sort (fn (a,b) => Term_Ord.fast_term_ord (term_of a, term_of b)) (f p)
+   fun gen x t = Thm.apply (all (Thm.ctyp_of_term x)) (Thm.lambda x t)
+   val ts = sort (fn (a,b) => Term_Ord.fast_term_ord (Thm.term_of a, Thm.term_of b)) (f p)
    val p' = fold_rev gen ts p
  in Thm.implies_intr p' (Thm.implies_elim st (fold Thm.forall_elim ts (Thm.assume p'))) end));
 
@@ -849,7 +854,7 @@
    let
      val cpth = 
        if Config.get ctxt quick_and_dirty
-       then oracle (ctxt, Envir.beta_norm (Envir.eta_long [] (term_of (Thm.dest_arg p))))
+       then oracle (ctxt, Envir.beta_norm (Envir.eta_long [] (Thm.term_of (Thm.dest_arg p))))
        else Conv.arg_conv (conv ctxt) p
      val p' = Thm.rhs_of cpth
      val th = Thm.implies_intr p' (Thm.equal_elim (Thm.symmetric cpth) (Thm.assume p'))
@@ -891,7 +896,7 @@
 val constsN = "consts";
 val any_keyword = keyword constsN
 val thms = Scan.repeat (Scan.unless any_keyword Attrib.multi_thm) >> flat;
-val terms = thms >> map (term_of o Drule.dest_term);
+val terms = thms >> map (Thm.term_of o Drule.dest_term);
 
 fun optional scan = Scan.optional scan [];
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/qelim.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/qelim.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Qelim/qelim.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 fun gen_qelim_conv precv postcv simpex_conv ins env atcv ncv qcv =
  let
   fun conv env p =
-   case (term_of p) of
+   case Thm.term_of p of
     Const(s,T)$_$_ =>
        if domain_type T = HOLogic.boolT
           andalso member (op =) [@{const_name HOL.conj}, @{const_name HOL.disj},
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
      val th = Thm.abstract_rule s x ((conv env' then_conv ncv env') p')
                    |> Drule.arg_cong_rule e
      val th' = simpex_conv (Thm.rhs_of th)
-     val (_, r) = Thm.dest_equals (cprop_of th')
+     val (_, r) = Thm.dest_equals (Thm.cprop_of th')
     in if Thm.is_reflexive th' then Thm.transitive th (qcv env (Thm.rhs_of th))
        else Thm.transitive (Thm.transitive th th') (conv env r) end
   | Const(@{const_name Ex},_)$ _ => (Thm.eta_long_conversion then_conv conv env) p
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Quickcheck/find_unused_assms.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Quickcheck/find_unused_assms.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Quickcheck/find_unused_assms.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -14,7 +14,7 @@
 struct
 
 fun thms_of thy thy_name = Global_Theory.all_thms_of thy false
-  |> filter (fn (_, th) => Context.theory_name (theory_of_thm th) = thy_name)
+  |> filter (fn (_, th) => Context.theory_name (Thm.theory_of_thm th) = thy_name)
 
 fun do_while P f s list =
   if P s then
@@ -52,7 +52,7 @@
             if member (op =) S x then I
             else insert (eq_set (op =)) (insert (op =) x S)) X) Ss []
     fun check (s, th) =
-      (case Logic.strip_horn (prop_of (Thm.unvarify_global th)) of
+      (case Logic.strip_horn (Thm.prop_of (Thm.unvarify_global th)) of
         ([], _) => (s, NONE)
       | (ts, t) =>
           let
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Quotient/quotient_def.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Quotient/quotient_def.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Quotient/quotient_def.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -156,7 +156,7 @@
       let
         val lhs_eq =
           thm
-          |> prop_of
+          |> Thm.prop_of
           |> Logic.dest_implies
           |> fst
           |> strip_all_body
@@ -178,7 +178,7 @@
     val internal_rsp_tm = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (Syntax.check_term lthy (rsp_rel $ rhs $ rhs))
     val readable_rsp_thm_eq = mk_readable_rsp_thm_eq internal_rsp_tm lthy
     val maybe_proven_rsp_thm = try_to_prove_refl readable_rsp_thm_eq
-    val (readable_rsp_tm, _) = Logic.dest_implies (prop_of readable_rsp_thm_eq)
+    val (readable_rsp_tm, _) = Logic.dest_implies (Thm.prop_of readable_rsp_thm_eq)
   
     fun after_qed thm_list lthy = 
       let
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Quotient/quotient_info.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Quotient/quotient_info.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Quotient/quotient_info.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@
           Pretty.str "relation map:",
           Pretty.str relmap,
           Pretty.str "quot. theorem:",
-          Syntax.pretty_term ctxt (prop_of quot_thm)])
+          Syntax.pretty_term ctxt (Thm.prop_of quot_thm)])
   in
     map prt_map (Symtab.dest (get_quotmaps (Context.Proof ctxt)))
     |> Pretty.big_list "maps for type constructors:"
@@ -178,9 +178,9 @@
         Pretty.str "relation:",
         Syntax.pretty_term ctxt equiv_rel,
         Pretty.str "equiv. thm:",
-        Syntax.pretty_term ctxt (prop_of equiv_thm),
+        Syntax.pretty_term ctxt (Thm.prop_of equiv_thm),
         Pretty.str "quot. thm:",
-        Syntax.pretty_term ctxt (prop_of quot_thm)])
+        Syntax.pretty_term ctxt (Thm.prop_of quot_thm)])
   in
     map (prt_quot o snd) (Symtab.dest (get_quotients (Context.Proof ctxt)))
     |> Pretty.big_list "quotients:"
@@ -218,7 +218,7 @@
         Pretty.str ":=",
         Syntax.pretty_term ctxt rconst,
         Pretty.str "as",
-        Syntax.pretty_term ctxt (prop_of def)])
+        Syntax.pretty_term ctxt (Thm.prop_of def)])
   in
     map prt_qconst (maps snd (Symtab.dest (get_quotconsts (Context.Proof ctxt))))
     |> Pretty.big_list "quotient constants:"
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Quotient/quotient_tacs.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Quotient/quotient_tacs.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Quotient/quotient_tacs.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -43,7 +43,7 @@
 fun atomize_thm ctxt thm =
   let
     val thm' = Thm.legacy_freezeT (forall_intr_vars thm) (* FIXME/TODO: is this proper Isar-technology? no! *)
-    val thm'' = Object_Logic.atomize ctxt (cprop_of thm')
+    val thm'' = Object_Logic.atomize ctxt (Thm.cprop_of thm')
   in
     @{thm equal_elim_rule1} OF [thm'', thm']
   end
@@ -73,10 +73,10 @@
 
 
 fun prep_trm thy (x, (T, t)) =
-  (cterm_of thy (Var (x, T)), cterm_of thy t)
+  (Thm.cterm_of thy (Var (x, T)), Thm.cterm_of thy t)
 
 fun prep_ty thy (x, (S, ty)) =
-  (ctyp_of thy (TVar (x, S)), ctyp_of thy ty)
+  (Thm.ctyp_of thy (TVar (x, S)), Thm.ctyp_of thy ty)
 
 fun get_match_inst thy pat trm =
   let
@@ -100,8 +100,8 @@
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
     fun get_lhs thm = fst (Logic.dest_equals (Thm.concl_of thm))
-    val ty_inst = map (SOME o ctyp_of thy) [domain_type (fastype_of R2)]
-    val trm_inst = map (SOME o cterm_of thy) [R2, R1]
+    val ty_inst = map (SOME o Thm.ctyp_of thy) [domain_type (fastype_of R2)]
+    val trm_inst = map (SOME o Thm.cterm_of thy) [R2, R1]
   in
     (case try (Drule.instantiate' ty_inst trm_inst) ball_bex_thm of
       NONE => NONE
@@ -143,7 +143,7 @@
 *)
 
 fun reflp_get ctxt =
-  map_filter (fn th => if prems_of th = [] then SOME (OF1 @{thm equivp_reflp} th) else NONE
+  map_filter (fn th => if Thm.prems_of th = [] then SOME (OF1 @{thm equivp_reflp} th) else NONE
     handle THM _ => NONE) (rev (Named_Theorems.get ctxt @{named_theorems quot_equiv}))
 
 val eq_imp_rel = @{lemma "equivp R ==> a = b --> R a b" by (simp add: equivp_reflp)}
@@ -194,22 +194,22 @@
   end
 
 fun quot_true_simple_conv ctxt fnctn ctrm =
-  case term_of ctrm of
+  (case Thm.term_of ctrm of
     (Const (@{const_name Quot_True}, _) $ x) =>
       let
         val fx = fnctn x;
         val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt;
-        val cx = cterm_of thy x;
-        val cfx = cterm_of thy fx;
-        val cxt = ctyp_of thy (fastype_of x);
-        val cfxt = ctyp_of thy (fastype_of fx);
+        val cx = Thm.cterm_of thy x;
+        val cfx = Thm.cterm_of thy fx;
+        val cxt = Thm.ctyp_of thy (fastype_of x);
+        val cfxt = Thm.ctyp_of thy (fastype_of fx);
         val thm = Drule.instantiate' [SOME cxt, SOME cfxt] [SOME cx, SOME cfx] @{thm QT_imp}
       in
         Conv.rewr_conv thm ctrm
-      end
+      end)
 
 fun quot_true_conv ctxt fnctn ctrm =
-  (case term_of ctrm of
+  (case Thm.term_of ctrm of
     (Const (@{const_name Quot_True}, _) $ _) =>
       quot_true_simple_conv ctxt fnctn ctrm
   | _ $ _ => Conv.comb_conv (quot_true_conv ctxt fnctn) ctrm
@@ -238,8 +238,8 @@
 val apply_rsp_tac =
   Subgoal.FOCUS (fn {concl, asms, context,...} =>
     let
-      val bare_concl = HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (term_of concl)
-      val qt_asm = find_qt_asm (map term_of asms)
+      val bare_concl = HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.term_of concl)
+      val qt_asm = find_qt_asm (map Thm.term_of asms)
     in
       case (bare_concl, qt_asm) of
         (R2 $ (f $ x) $ (g $ y), SOME (qt_fun, qt_arg)) =>
@@ -251,8 +251,8 @@
               val ty_b = fastype_of qt_arg
               val ty_f = range_type (fastype_of f)
               val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of context
-              val ty_inst = map (SOME o (ctyp_of thy)) [ty_x, ty_b, ty_f]
-              val t_inst = map (SOME o (cterm_of thy)) [R2, f, g, x, y];
+              val ty_inst = map (SOME o Thm.ctyp_of thy) [ty_x, ty_b, ty_f]
+              val t_inst = map (SOME o Thm.cterm_of thy) [R2, f, g, x, y];
               val inst_thm = Drule.instantiate' ty_inst
                 ([NONE, NONE, NONE] @ t_inst) @{thm apply_rspQ3}
             in
@@ -268,13 +268,13 @@
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
   in
-    case try (cterm_of thy) R of (* There can be loose bounds in R *)
+    case try (Thm.cterm_of thy) R of (* There can be loose bounds in R *)
       SOME ctm =>
         let
           val ty = domain_type (fastype_of R)
         in
-          case try (Drule.instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of thy ty)]
-              [SOME (cterm_of thy R)]) @{thm equals_rsp} of
+          case try (Drule.instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of thy ty)]
+              [SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy R)]) @{thm equals_rsp} of
             SOME thm => rtac thm THEN' quotient_tac ctxt
           | NONE => K no_tac
         end
@@ -288,9 +288,9 @@
         (let
           val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt;
           val (ty_a, ty_b) = dest_funT (fastype_of abs);
-          val ty_inst = map (SOME o (ctyp_of thy)) [ty_a, ty_b];
+          val ty_inst = map (SOME o Thm.ctyp_of thy) [ty_a, ty_b];
         in
-          case try (map (SOME o (cterm_of thy))) [rel, abs, rep] of
+          case try (map (SOME o Thm.cterm_of thy)) [rel, abs, rep] of
             SOME t_inst =>
               (case try (Drule.instantiate' ty_inst t_inst) @{thm rep_abs_rsp} of
                 SOME inst_thm => (rtac inst_thm THEN' quotient_tac ctxt) i
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@
 
 (* expands all map_funs, except in front of the (bound) variables listed in xs *)
 fun map_fun_simple_conv xs ctrm =
-  (case term_of ctrm of
+  (case Thm.term_of ctrm of
     ((Const (@{const_name "map_fun"}, _) $ _ $ _) $ h $ _) =>
         if member (op=) xs h
         then Conv.all_conv ctrm
@@ -429,11 +429,11 @@
   | _ => Conv.all_conv ctrm)
 
 fun map_fun_conv xs ctxt ctrm =
-  (case term_of ctrm of
+  (case Thm.term_of ctrm of
     _ $ _ =>
       (Conv.comb_conv (map_fun_conv xs ctxt) then_conv
         map_fun_simple_conv xs) ctrm
-  | Abs _ => Conv.abs_conv (fn (x, ctxt) => map_fun_conv ((term_of x)::xs) ctxt) ctxt ctrm
+  | Abs _ => Conv.abs_conv (fn (x, ctxt) => map_fun_conv (Thm.term_of x :: xs) ctxt) ctxt ctrm
   | _ => Conv.all_conv ctrm)
 
 fun map_fun_tac ctxt = CONVERSION (map_fun_conv [] ctxt)
@@ -472,22 +472,23 @@
    make_inst_id is used
 *)
 fun lambda_prs_simple_conv ctxt ctrm =
-  (case term_of ctrm of
+  (case Thm.term_of ctrm of
     (Const (@{const_name map_fun}, _) $ r1 $ a2) $ (Abs _) =>
       let
         val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
         val (ty_b, ty_a) = dest_funT (fastype_of r1)
         val (ty_c, ty_d) = dest_funT (fastype_of a2)
-        val tyinst = map (SOME o (ctyp_of thy)) [ty_a, ty_b, ty_c, ty_d]
-        val tinst = [NONE, NONE, SOME (cterm_of thy r1), NONE, SOME (cterm_of thy a2)]
+        val tyinst = map (SOME o Thm.ctyp_of thy) [ty_a, ty_b, ty_c, ty_d]
+        val tinst = [NONE, NONE, SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy r1), NONE, SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy a2)]
         val thm1 = Drule.instantiate' tyinst tinst @{thm lambda_prs[THEN eq_reflection]}
         val thm2 = solve_quotient_assm ctxt (solve_quotient_assm ctxt thm1)
         val thm3 = rewrite_rule ctxt @{thms id_apply[THEN eq_reflection]} thm2
         val (insp, inst) =
           if ty_c = ty_d
-          then make_inst_id (term_of (Thm.lhs_of thm3)) (term_of ctrm)
-          else make_inst (term_of (Thm.lhs_of thm3)) (term_of ctrm)
-        val thm4 = Drule.instantiate_normalize ([], [(cterm_of thy insp, cterm_of thy inst)]) thm3
+          then make_inst_id (Thm.term_of (Thm.lhs_of thm3)) (Thm.term_of ctrm)
+          else make_inst (Thm.term_of (Thm.lhs_of thm3)) (Thm.term_of ctrm)
+        val thm4 =
+          Drule.instantiate_normalize ([], [(Thm.cterm_of thy insp, Thm.cterm_of thy inst)]) thm3
       in
         Conv.rewr_conv thm4 ctrm
       end
@@ -540,7 +541,7 @@
 (* Tactic for Generalising Free Variables in a Goal *)
 
 fun inst_spec ctrm =
-  Drule.instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of_term ctrm)] [NONE, SOME ctrm] @{thm spec}
+  Drule.instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of_term ctrm)] [NONE, SOME ctrm] @{thm spec}
 
 fun inst_spec_tac ctrms =
   EVERY' (map (dtac o inst_spec) ctrms)
@@ -556,7 +557,7 @@
     let
       val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
       val vrs = Term.add_frees concl []
-      val cvrs = map (cterm_of thy o Free) vrs
+      val cvrs = map (Thm.cterm_of thy o Free) vrs
       val concl' = apply_under_Trueprop (all_list vrs) concl
       val goal = Logic.mk_implies (concl', concl)
       val rule = Goal.prove ctxt [] [] goal
@@ -616,10 +617,10 @@
       handle Quotient_Term.LIFT_MATCH msg => lift_match_error ctxt msg rtrm qtrm
   in
     Drule.instantiate' []
-      [SOME (cterm_of thy rtrm'),
-       SOME (cterm_of thy reg_goal),
+      [SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy rtrm'),
+       SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy reg_goal),
        NONE,
-       SOME (cterm_of thy inj_goal)] procedure_thm
+       SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy inj_goal)] procedure_thm
   end
 
 
@@ -676,9 +677,9 @@
       handle Quotient_Term.LIFT_MATCH msg => lift_match_error ctxt msg rtrm qtrm
   in
     Drule.instantiate' []
-      [SOME (cterm_of thy reg_goal),
+      [SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy reg_goal),
        NONE,
-       SOME (cterm_of thy inj_goal)] partiality_procedure_thm
+       SOME (Thm.cterm_of thy inj_goal)] partiality_procedure_thm
   end
 
 
@@ -734,7 +735,7 @@
                |> Thm.forall_intr_frees
                |> atomize_thm ctxt
 
-        val rule = procedure_inst ctxt (prop_of rthm') goal
+        val rule = procedure_inst ctxt (Thm.prop_of rthm') goal
       in
         (rtac rule THEN' rtac rthm') i
       end)
@@ -757,7 +758,7 @@
 fun lifted ctxt qtys simps rthm =
   let
     val ((_, [rthm']), ctxt') = Variable.import true [rthm] ctxt
-    val goal = Quotient_Term.derive_qtrm ctxt' qtys (prop_of rthm')
+    val goal = Quotient_Term.derive_qtrm ctxt' qtys (Thm.prop_of rthm')
   in
     Goal.prove ctxt' [] [] goal
       (K (HEADGOAL (lift_single_tac ctxt' simps rthm')))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Quotient/quotient_term.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Quotient/quotient_term.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Quotient/quotient_term.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -355,7 +355,7 @@
     | NONE => raise CODE_GEN ("get_relmap (no relation map function found for type " ^ s ^ ")"))
   end
 
-fun is_id_quot thm = (prop_of thm = prop_of @{thm identity_quotient3})
+fun is_id_quot thm = (Thm.prop_of thm = Thm.prop_of @{thm identity_quotient3})  (* FIXME equality *)
 
 open Lifting_Util
 
@@ -365,7 +365,7 @@
 
 fun get_rel_from_quot_thm quot_thm = 
   let
-    val (_ $ rel $ _ $ _) = (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) quot_thm
+    val (_ $ rel $ _ $ _) = (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) quot_thm
   in
     rel
   end
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Quotient/quotient_type.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Quotient/quotient_type.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Quotient/quotient_type.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -94,7 +94,7 @@
   
     val (rty, qty) = (dest_funT o fastype_of) abs_fun
     val abs_fun_graph = HOLogic.mk_eq(abs_fun $ Bound 1, Bound 0)
-    val Abs_body = (case (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) equiv_thm of
+    val Abs_body = (case (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) equiv_thm of
       Const (@{const_name equivp}, _) $ _ => abs_fun_graph
       | Const (@{const_name part_equivp}, _) $ rel => 
         HOLogic.mk_conj (force_type_of_rel rel rty $ Bound 1 $ Bound 1, abs_fun_graph)
@@ -112,20 +112,19 @@
 
 fun setup_lifting_package quot3_thm equiv_thm opt_par_thm lthy =
   let
-    val (_ $ _ $ abs_fun $ _) = (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) quot3_thm
+    val (_ $ _ $ abs_fun $ _) = (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) quot3_thm
     val (T_def, lthy') = define_cr_rel equiv_thm abs_fun lthy
     val (rty, qty) = (dest_funT o fastype_of) abs_fun
     val qty_name = (Binding.name o Long_Name.base_name o fst o dest_Type) qty
     val quotient_thm_name = Binding.prefix_name "Quotient_" qty_name
-    val (reflp_thm, quot_thm) = (case (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) equiv_thm of
-      Const (@{const_name equivp}, _) $ _ =>
-        (SOME (equiv_thm RS @{thm equivp_reflp2}),
-         [quot3_thm, T_def, equiv_thm] MRSL @{thm Quotient3_to_Quotient_equivp})
+    val (reflp_thm, quot_thm) =
+      (case (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) equiv_thm of
+        Const (@{const_name equivp}, _) $ _ =>
+          (SOME (equiv_thm RS @{thm equivp_reflp2}),
+            [quot3_thm, T_def, equiv_thm] MRSL @{thm Quotient3_to_Quotient_equivp})
       | Const (@{const_name part_equivp}, _) $ _ =>
-        (NONE,
-        [quot3_thm, T_def] MRSL @{thm Quotient3_to_Quotient})
-      | _ => error "unsupported equivalence theorem"
-      )
+          (NONE, [quot3_thm, T_def] MRSL @{thm Quotient3_to_Quotient})
+      | _ => error "unsupported equivalence theorem")
   in
     lthy'
       |> Lifting_Setup.setup_by_quotient quot_thm reflp_thm opt_par_thm
@@ -134,7 +133,7 @@
 
 fun init_quotient_infr quot_thm equiv_thm opt_par_thm lthy =
   let
-    val (_ $ rel $ abs $ rep) = (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) quot_thm
+    val (_ $ rel $ abs $ rep) = (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) quot_thm
     val (qtyp, rtyp) = (dest_funT o fastype_of) rep
     val qty_full_name = (fst o dest_Type) qtyp
     val quotients = {qtyp = qtyp, rtyp = rtyp, equiv_rel = rel, equiv_thm = equiv_thm, 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/SMT/verit_proof_parse.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/SMT/verit_proof_parse.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/SMT/verit_proof_parse.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -37,7 +37,7 @@
 
     fun step_of_assume j (_, th) =
       VeriT_Proof.VeriT_Step {id = SMTLIB_Interface.assert_name_of_index (id_of_index j),
-        rule = veriT_input_rule, prems = [], concl = prop_of th, fixes = []}
+        rule = veriT_input_rule, prems = [], concl = Thm.prop_of th, fixes = []}
 
     val (actual_steps, _) = VeriT_Proof.parse typs terms output ctxt
     val used_assert_ids = fold add_used_asserts_in_step actual_steps []
@@ -65,8 +65,8 @@
     val helper_ids' = filter (fn (i, _) => i >= helpers_i) used_assms
 
     val fact_helper_ts =
-      map (fn (_, th) => (ATP_Util.short_thm_name ctxt th, prop_of th)) helper_ids' @
-      map (fn (_, ((s, _), th)) => (s, prop_of th)) fact_ids'
+      map (fn (_, th) => (ATP_Util.short_thm_name ctxt th, Thm.prop_of th)) helper_ids' @
+      map (fn (_, ((s, _), th)) => (s, Thm.prop_of th)) fact_ids'
     val fact_helper_ids' =
       map (apsnd (ATP_Util.short_thm_name ctxt)) helper_ids' @ map (apsnd (fst o fst)) fact_ids'
   in
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/SMT/z3_replay.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/SMT/z3_replay.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/SMT/z3_replay.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -201,8 +201,8 @@
     val helper_ids' = map_filter (try (fn (~1, idth) => idth)) iidths
 
     val fact_helper_ts =
-      map (fn (_, th) => (ATP_Util.short_thm_name ctxt th, prop_of th)) helper_ids' @
-      map (fn (_, ((s, _), th)) => (s, prop_of th)) fact_ids'
+      map (fn (_, th) => (ATP_Util.short_thm_name ctxt th, Thm.prop_of th)) helper_ids' @
+      map (fn (_, ((s, _), th)) => (s, Thm.prop_of th)) fact_ids'
     val fact_helper_ids' =
       map (apsnd (ATP_Util.short_thm_name ctxt)) helper_ids' @ map (apsnd (fst o fst)) fact_ids'
   in
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -75,7 +75,7 @@
 
       val {context = ctxt, facts = chained, goal} = Proof.goal state
       val (_, hyp_ts, concl_t) = strip_subgoal goal i ctxt
-      val goal_t = Logic.list_implies (map prop_of chained @ hyp_ts, concl_t)
+      val goal_t = Logic.list_implies (map Thm.prop_of chained @ hyp_ts, concl_t)
 
       fun try_methss [] [] = (used_facts, (preferred_meth, Play_Timed_Out Time.zeroTime))
         | try_methss ress [] =
@@ -305,7 +305,7 @@
             val problem =
               {comment = "", state = state, goal = goal, subgoal = i, subgoal_count = n,
                factss = factss}
-            val learn = mash_learn_proof ctxt params (prop_of goal) all_facts
+            val learn = mash_learn_proof ctxt params (Thm.prop_of goal) all_facts
             val launch = launch_prover params mode output_result only learn
           in
             if mode = Auto_Try then
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_fact.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_fact.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_fact.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -91,7 +91,7 @@
   | is_rec_def (Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ t1 $ t2) = is_rec_eq t1 t2
   | is_rec_def _ = false
 
-fun is_assum assms th = exists (fn ct => prop_of th aconv term_of ct) assms
+fun is_assum assms th = exists (fn ct => Thm.prop_of th aconv Thm.term_of ct) assms
 fun is_chained chained = member Thm.eq_thm_prop chained
 
 fun scope_of_thm global assms chained th =
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
   if Termtab.is_empty css then
     General
   else
-    let val t = prop_of th in
+    let val t = Thm.prop_of th in
       (* FIXME: use structured name *)
       if String.isSubstring ".induct" name andalso may_be_induction t then
         Induction
@@ -224,7 +224,7 @@
 val skolem_thesis = Name.skolem Auto_Bind.thesisN
 
 fun is_that_fact th =
-  exists_subterm (fn Free (s, _) => s = skolem_thesis | _ => false) (prop_of th)
+  exists_subterm (fn Free (s, _) => s = skolem_thesis | _ => false) (Thm.prop_of th)
   andalso String.isSuffix sep_that (Thm.get_name_hint th)
 
 datatype interest = Deal_Breaker | Interesting | Boring
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@
         combine_interests (interest_of_bool t) (interest_of_bool u)
       | interest_of_prop _ _ = Deal_Breaker
 
-    val t = prop_of th
+    val t = Thm.prop_of th
   in
     (interest_of_prop [] t <> Interesting andalso not (Thm.eq_thm_prop (@{thm ext}, th))) orelse
     is_that_fact th
@@ -298,7 +298,7 @@
   |> fst
 
 fun backquote_term ctxt = close_form #> hackish_string_of_term ctxt #> backquote
-fun backquote_thm ctxt = backquote_term ctxt o prop_of
+fun backquote_thm ctxt = backquote_term ctxt o Thm.prop_of
 
 (* TODO: rewrite to use nets and/or to reuse existing data structures *)
 fun clasimpset_rule_table_of ctxt =
@@ -307,7 +307,7 @@
       Termtab.empty
     else
       let
-        fun add stature th = Termtab.update (normalize_vars (prop_of th), stature)
+        fun add stature th = Termtab.update (normalize_vars (Thm.prop_of th), stature)
 
         val {safeIs, (* safeEs, *) hazIs, (* hazEs, *) ...} = ctxt |> claset_of |> Classical.rep_cs
         val intros = Item_Net.content safeIs @ Item_Net.content hazIs
@@ -320,7 +320,7 @@
           |> filter (curry (op =) Spec_Rules.Equational o fst)
           |> maps (snd o snd)
           |> filter_out (member Thm.eq_thm_prop risky_defs)
-          |> List.partition (is_rec_def o prop_of)
+          |> List.partition (is_rec_def o Thm.prop_of)
         val spec_intros = specs
           |> filter (member (op =) [Spec_Rules.Inductive, Spec_Rules.Co_Inductive] o fst)
           |> maps (snd o snd)
@@ -359,7 +359,7 @@
 
 fun build_name_tables name_of facts =
   let
-    fun cons_thm (_, th) = Termtab.cons_list (normalize_vars (normalize_eq (prop_of th)), th)
+    fun cons_thm (_, th) = Termtab.cons_list (normalize_vars (normalize_eq (Thm.prop_of th)), th)
     fun add_plain canon alias =
       Symtab.update (Thm.get_name_hint alias, name_of (if_thm_before canon alias))
     fun add_plains (_, aliases as canon :: _) = fold (add_plain canon) aliases
@@ -373,13 +373,13 @@
 
 fun fact_distinct eq facts =
   fold (fn fact as (_, th) =>
-      Net.insert_term_safe (eq o apply2 (normalize_eq o prop_of o snd))
-        (normalize_eq (prop_of th), fact))
+      Net.insert_term_safe (eq o apply2 (normalize_eq o Thm.prop_of o snd))
+        (normalize_eq (Thm.prop_of th), fact))
     facts Net.empty
   |> Net.entries
 
 fun struct_induct_rule_on th =
-  (case Logic.strip_horn (prop_of th) of
+  (case Logic.strip_horn (Thm.prop_of th) of
     (prems, @{const Trueprop} $ ((p as Var ((p_name, 0), _)) $ (a as Var (_, ind_T)))) =>
     if not (is_TVar ind_T) andalso length prems > 1 andalso
        exists (exists_subterm (curry (op aconv) p)) prems andalso
@@ -495,7 +495,7 @@
               (j - 1,
                if not (member Thm.eq_thm_prop add_ths th) andalso
                   (is_likely_tautology_too_meta_or_too_technical th orelse
-                   is_too_complex (prop_of th)) then
+                   is_too_complex (Thm.prop_of th)) then
                  accum
                else
                  let
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_mash.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_mash.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_mash.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -783,7 +783,7 @@
     | order => order)
 
 fun crude_thm_ord p =
-  (case crude_theory_ord (apply2 theory_of_thm p) of
+  (case crude_theory_ord (apply2 Thm.theory_of_thm p) of
     EQUAL =>
     (* The hack below is necessary because of odd dependencies that are not reflected in the theory
        comparison. *)
@@ -795,7 +795,7 @@
     end
   | ord => ord)
 
-val thm_less_eq = Theory.subthy o apply2 theory_of_thm
+val thm_less_eq = Theory.subthy o apply2 Thm.theory_of_thm
 fun thm_less p = thm_less_eq p andalso not (thm_less_eq (swap p))
 
 val freezeT = Type.legacy_freeze_type
@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@
   | freeze (Free (s, T)) = Free (s, freezeT T)
   | freeze t = t
 
-fun goal_of_thm thy = prop_of #> freeze #> cterm_of thy #> Goal.init
+fun goal_of_thm thy = Thm.prop_of #> freeze #> Thm.cterm_of thy #> Goal.init
 
 fun run_prover_for_mash ctxt params prover goal_name facts goal =
   let
@@ -1120,8 +1120,8 @@
 
 fun maximal_wrt_access_graph _ [] = []
   | maximal_wrt_access_graph access_G ((fact as (_, th)) :: facts) =
-    let val thy = theory_of_thm th in
-      fact :: filter_out (fn (_, th') => strict_subthy (theory_of_thm th', thy)) facts
+    let val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm th in
+      fact :: filter_out (fn (_, th') => strict_subthy (Thm.theory_of_thm th', thy)) facts
       |> map (nickname_of_thm o snd)
       |> maximal_wrt_graph access_G
     end
@@ -1163,11 +1163,11 @@
     val chained = filter (fn ((_, (scope, _)), _) => scope = Chained) facts
 
     fun fact_has_right_theory (_, th) =
-      thy_name = Context.theory_name (theory_of_thm th)
+      thy_name = Context.theory_name (Thm.theory_of_thm th)
 
     fun chained_or_extra_features_of factor (((_, stature), th), weight) =
-      [prop_of th]
-      |> features_of ctxt (theory_of_thm th) stature
+      [Thm.prop_of th]
+      |> features_of ctxt (Thm.theory_of_thm th) stature
       |> map (rpair (weight * factor))
 
     val {access_G, xtabs = ((num_facts, fact_tab), (num_feats, feat_tab)), ffds, freqs, ...} =
@@ -1380,7 +1380,7 @@
               (learns, (num_nontrivial, next_commit, _)) =
             let
               val name = nickname_of_thm th
-              val feats = features_of ctxt (theory_of_thm th) stature [prop_of th]
+              val feats = features_of ctxt (Thm.theory_of_thm th) stature [Thm.prop_of th]
               val deps = these (deps_of status th)
               val num_nontrivial = num_nontrivial |> not (null deps) ? Integer.add 1
               val learns = (name, parents, feats, deps) :: learns
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_mepo.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_mepo.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_mepo.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -220,7 +220,7 @@
     t
 
 fun theory_const_prop_of fudge th =
-  theory_constify fudge (Context.theory_name (theory_of_thm th)) (prop_of th)
+  theory_constify fudge (Context.theory_name (Thm.theory_of_thm th)) (Thm.prop_of th)
 
 fun pair_consts_fact thy fudge fact =
   (case fact |> snd |> theory_const_prop_of fudge |> pconsts_in_fact thy of
@@ -379,7 +379,7 @@
   if Symtab.is_empty tab then
     Symtab.empty
     |> fold (add_pconsts_in_term thy) (map_filter (fn ((_, (sc', _)), th) =>
-      if sc' = sc then SOME (prop_of th) else NONE) facts)
+      if sc' = sc then SOME (Thm.prop_of th) else NONE) facts)
   else
     tab
 
@@ -398,7 +398,7 @@
              | SOME n => if n = length args then SOME tab else NONE))
         | _ => SOME tab)
   in
-    aux (prop_of th) []
+    aux (Thm.prop_of th) []
   end
 
 (* FIXME: This is currently only useful for polymorphic type encodings. *)
@@ -421,7 +421,7 @@
     val const_tab = fold (count_fact_consts thy fudge) facts Symtab.empty
     val add_pconsts = add_pconsts_in_term thy
     val chained_ts =
-      facts |> map_filter (try (fn ((_, (Chained, _)), th) => prop_of th))
+      facts |> map_filter (try (fn ((_, (Chained, _)), th) => Thm.prop_of th))
     val chained_const_tab = Symtab.empty |> fold add_pconsts chained_ts
     val goal_const_tab =
       Symtab.empty
@@ -502,7 +502,7 @@
       fold_aterms (curry (fn (Const (s', _), false) => s' = s | (_, b) => b)) t
                   false
     fun uses_const_anywhere accepts s =
-      exists (uses_const s o prop_of o snd) accepts orelse
+      exists (uses_const s o Thm.prop_of o snd) accepts orelse
       exists (uses_const s) (concl_t :: hyp_ts)
     fun add_set_const_thms accepts =
       exists (uses_const_anywhere accepts) set_consts ? append set_thms
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_prover_atp.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_prover_atp.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_prover_atp.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -261,10 +261,10 @@
                 cache_value
               else
                 facts
-                |> not sound ? filter_out (is_dangerous_prop ctxt o prop_of o snd)
+                |> not sound ? filter_out (is_dangerous_prop ctxt o Thm.prop_of o snd)
                 |> take num_facts
                 |> not (is_type_enc_polymorphic type_enc) ? monomorphize_facts
-                |> map (apsnd prop_of)
+                |> map (apsnd Thm.prop_of)
                 |> (if waldmeister_new then
                       generate_waldmeister_problem ctxt hyp_ts concl_t
                         #> (fn (a,b,c,d,e) => (a,b,c,d,SOME e))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_util.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_util.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Sledgehammer/sledgehammer_util.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -149,7 +149,7 @@
     let
       val (state, i, tool, message) = f ()
       val ctxt = Proof.context_of state
-      val goal = Logic.get_goal (prop_of (#goal (Proof.goal state))) i
+      val goal = Logic.get_goal (Thm.prop_of (#goal (Proof.goal state))) i
       val hash = String.substring (SHA1.rep (SHA1.digest (hackish_string_of_term ctxt goal)), 0, 12)
     in
       File.append (Path.explode "$ISABELLE_HOME_USER/spy_sledgehammer")
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/TFL/dcterm.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/TFL/dcterm.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/TFL/dcterm.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -70,7 +70,7 @@
 val mk_hol_const = Thm.cterm_of @{theory HOL} o Const;
 
 fun mk_exists (r as (Bvar, Body)) =
-  let val ty = #T(rep_cterm Bvar)
+  let val ty = #T(Thm.rep_cterm Bvar)
       val c = mk_hol_const(@{const_name Ex}, (ty --> HOLogic.boolT) --> HOLogic.boolT)
   in capply c (uncurry cabs r) end;
 
@@ -88,12 +88,12 @@
  * The primitives.
  *---------------------------------------------------------------------------*)
 fun dest_const ctm =
-   (case #t(rep_cterm ctm)
+   (case #t(Thm.rep_cterm ctm)
       of Const(s,ty) => {Name = s, Ty = ty}
        | _ => raise ERR "dest_const" "not a constant");
 
 fun dest_var ctm =
-   (case #t(rep_cterm ctm)
+   (case #t(Thm.rep_cterm ctm)
       of Var((s,i),ty) => {Name=s, Ty=ty}
        | Free(s,ty)    => {Name=s, Ty=ty}
        |             _ => raise ERR "dest_var" "not a variable");
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/TFL/post.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/TFL/post.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/TFL/post.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -26,7 +26,7 @@
  *--------------------------------------------------------------------------*)
 fun termination_goals rules =
     map (Type.legacy_freeze o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop)
-      (fold_rev (union (op aconv) o prems_of) rules []);
+      (fold_rev (union (op aconv) o Thm.prems_of) rules []);
 
 (*---------------------------------------------------------------------------
  * Three postprocessors are applied to the definition.  It
@@ -62,17 +62,18 @@
    handle Utils.ERR _ => false;
    
 val P_imp_P_eq_True = @{thm eqTrueI} RS eq_reflection;
-fun mk_meta_eq r = case concl_of r of
+fun mk_meta_eq r =
+  (case Thm.concl_of r of
      Const(@{const_name Pure.eq},_)$_$_ => r
   |   _ $(Const(@{const_name HOL.eq},_)$_$_) => r RS eq_reflection
-  |   _ => r RS P_imp_P_eq_True
+  |   _ => r RS P_imp_P_eq_True)
 
 (*Is this the best way to invoke the simplifier??*)
 fun rewrite ctxt L = rewrite_rule ctxt (map mk_meta_eq (filter_out id_thm L))
 
 fun join_assums ctxt th =
   let val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm th
-      val tych = cterm_of thy
+      val tych = Thm.cterm_of thy
       val {lhs,rhs} = USyntax.dest_eq(#2 (USyntax.strip_forall (concl th)))
       val cntxtl = (#1 o USyntax.strip_imp) lhs  (* cntxtl should = cntxtr *)
       val cntxtr = (#1 o USyntax.strip_imp) rhs  (* but union is solider *)
@@ -120,7 +121,7 @@
 
 (*lcp: curry the predicate of the induction rule*)
 fun curry_rule ctxt rl =
-  Split_Rule.split_rule_var ctxt (Term.head_of (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of rl))) rl;
+  Split_Rule.split_rule_var ctxt (Term.head_of (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of rl))) rl;
 
 (*lcp: put a theorem into Isabelle form, using meta-level connectives*)
 fun meta_outer ctxt =
@@ -187,7 +188,7 @@
   let val {functional,pats} = Prim.mk_functional thy eqs
       val (thy, def) = Prim.wfrec_definition0 thy fid R functional
       val ctxt = Proof_Context.transfer thy ctxt
-      val (lhs, _) = Logic.dest_equals (prop_of def)
+      val (lhs, _) = Logic.dest_equals (Thm.prop_of def)
       val {induct, rules, tcs} = simplify_defn strict thy ctxt congs wfs fid pats def
       val rules' = 
           if strict then derive_init_eqs ctxt rules eqs
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/TFL/rules.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/TFL/rules.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/TFL/rules.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -245,7 +245,8 @@
 
 fun DISJ_CASESL disjth thl =
    let val c = cconcl disjth
-       fun eq th atm = exists (fn t => HOLogic.dest_Trueprop t aconv term_of atm) (Thm.hyps_of th)
+       fun eq th atm =
+        exists (fn t => HOLogic.dest_Trueprop t aconv Thm.term_of atm) (Thm.hyps_of th)
        val tml = Dcterm.strip_disj c
        fun DL th [] = raise RULES_ERR "DISJ_CASESL" "no cases"
          | DL th [th1] = PROVE_HYP th th1
@@ -264,8 +265,8 @@
       val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm spec
       val prop = Thm.prop_of spec
       val x = hd (tl (Misc_Legacy.term_vars prop))
-      val cTV = ctyp_of thy (type_of x)
-      val gspec = Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy x) spec
+      val cTV = Thm.ctyp_of thy (type_of x)
+      val gspec = Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy x) spec
 in
 fun SPEC tm thm =
    let val gspec' = Drule.instantiate_normalize ([(cTV, Thm.ctyp_of_term tm)], []) gspec
@@ -281,10 +282,10 @@
 local val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm allI
       val prop = Thm.prop_of allI
       val [P] = Misc_Legacy.add_term_vars (prop, [])
-      fun cty_theta s = map (fn (i, (S, ty)) => (ctyp_of s (TVar (i, S)), ctyp_of s ty))
+      fun cty_theta s = map (fn (i, (S, ty)) => (Thm.ctyp_of s (TVar (i, S)), Thm.ctyp_of s ty))
       fun ctm_theta s = map (fn (i, (_, tm2)) =>
-                             let val ctm2 = cterm_of s tm2
-                             in (cterm_of s (Var(i,#T(rep_cterm ctm2))), ctm2)
+                             let val ctm2 = Thm.cterm_of s tm2
+                             in (Thm.cterm_of s (Var(i,#T(Thm.rep_cterm ctm2))), ctm2)
                              end)
       fun certify s (ty_theta,tm_theta) =
         (cty_theta s (Vartab.dest ty_theta),
@@ -300,7 +301,7 @@
        val thm = Thm.implies_elim allI2 gth
        val tp $ (A $ Abs(_,_,M)) = Thm.prop_of thm
        val prop' = tp $ (A $ Abs(x,ty,M))
-   in ALPHA thm (cterm_of thy prop')
+   in ALPHA thm (Thm.cterm_of thy prop')
    end
 end;
 
@@ -309,7 +310,7 @@
 fun GEN_ALL thm =
    let val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm thm
        val prop = Thm.prop_of thm
-       val tycheck = cterm_of thy
+       val tycheck = Thm.cterm_of thy
        val vlist = map tycheck (Misc_Legacy.add_term_vars (prop, []))
   in GENL vlist thm
   end;
@@ -355,8 +356,8 @@
 fun EXISTS (template,witness) thm =
    let val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm thm
        val prop = Thm.prop_of thm
-       val P' = cterm_of thy P
-       val x' = cterm_of thy x
+       val P' = Thm.cterm_of thy P
+       val x' = Thm.cterm_of thy x
        val abstr = #2 (Dcterm.dest_comb template)
    in
    thm RS (cterm_instantiate[(P',abstr), (x',witness)] exI)
@@ -388,9 +389,9 @@
 
 fun IT_EXISTS blist th =
    let val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm th
-       val tych = cterm_of thy
+       val tych = Thm.cterm_of thy
        val blist' = map (apply2 Thm.term_of) blist
-       fun ex v M  = cterm_of thy (USyntax.mk_exists{Bvar=v,Body = M})
+       fun ex v M  = Thm.cterm_of thy (USyntax.mk_exists{Bvar=v,Body = M})
 
   in
   fold_rev (fn (b as (r1,r2)) => fn thm =>
@@ -510,7 +511,7 @@
 (* Note: Thm.rename_params_rule counts from 1, not 0 *)
 fun rename thm =
   let val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm thm
-      val tych = cterm_of thy
+      val tych = Thm.cterm_of thy
       val ants = Logic.strip_imp_prems (Thm.prop_of thm)
       val news = get (ants,1,[])
   in
@@ -662,7 +663,7 @@
              val dummy = say (Display.string_of_thm ctxt thm)
              (* Unquantified eliminate *)
              fun uq_eliminate (thm,imp,thy) =
-                 let val tych = cterm_of thy
+                 let val tych = Thm.cterm_of thy
                      val dummy = print_cterm ctxt "To eliminate:" (tych imp)
                      val ants = map tych (Logic.strip_imp_prems imp)
                      val eq = Logic.strip_imp_concl imp
@@ -682,7 +683,7 @@
                     orelse error "assertion failed in CONTEXT_REWRITE_RULE"
                   val imp_body1 = subst_free (ListPair.zip (args, vstrl))
                                              imp_body
-                  val tych = cterm_of thy
+                  val tych = Thm.cterm_of thy
                   val ants1 = map tych (Logic.strip_imp_prems imp_body1)
                   val eq1 = Logic.strip_imp_concl imp_body1
                   val Q = get_lhs eq1
@@ -711,7 +712,7 @@
               in if (pbeta_redex Q) (length vlist)
                  then pq_eliminate (thm,thy,vlist,imp_body,Q)
                  else
-                 let val tych = cterm_of thy
+                 let val tych = Thm.cterm_of thy
                      val ants1 = map tych ants
                      val ctxt' = Simplifier.add_prems (map ASSUME ants1) ctxt
                      val Q_eeq_Q1 = Raw_Simplifier.rewrite_cterm
@@ -762,13 +763,13 @@
               val antl = case rcontext of [] => []
                          | _   => [USyntax.list_mk_conj(map cncl rcontext)]
               val TC = genl(USyntax.list_mk_imp(antl, A))
-              val dummy = print_cterm ctxt "func:" (cterm_of thy func)
-              val dummy = print_cterm ctxt "TC:" (cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop TC))
+              val dummy = print_cterm ctxt "func:" (Thm.cterm_of thy func)
+              val dummy = print_cterm ctxt "TC:" (Thm.cterm_of thy (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop TC))
               val dummy = tc_list := (TC :: !tc_list)
               val nestedp = is_some (USyntax.find_term is_func TC)
               val dummy = if nestedp then say "nested" else say "not_nested"
               val th' = if nestedp then raise RULES_ERR "solver" "nested function"
-                        else let val cTC = cterm_of thy
+                        else let val cTC = Thm.cterm_of thy
                                               (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop TC)
                              in case rcontext of
                                 [] => SPEC_ALL(ASSUME cTC)
@@ -781,8 +782,8 @@
     in
     (if (is_cong thm) then cong_prover else restrict_prover) ctxt thm
     end
-    val ctm = cprop_of th
-    val names = Misc_Legacy.add_term_names (term_of ctm, [])
+    val ctm = Thm.cprop_of th
+    val names = Misc_Legacy.add_term_names (Thm.term_of ctm, [])
     val th1 =
       Raw_Simplifier.rewrite_cterm (false, true, false)
         (prover names) (ctxt0 addsimps [cut_lemma'] |> fold Simplifier.add_eqcong congs) ctm
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Transfer/transfer.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Transfer/transfer.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Transfer/transfer.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -376,7 +376,7 @@
       | _ $ _ $ _ => true
       | _ => false
     fun safe_transfer_rule_conv ctm =
-      if is_transfer_rule (term_of ctm) then safe_Rel_conv ctm else Conv.all_conv ctm
+      if is_transfer_rule (Thm.term_of ctm) then safe_Rel_conv ctm else Conv.all_conv ctm
   in
     Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.prems_conv ~1 safe_transfer_rule_conv) thm
   end
@@ -440,9 +440,9 @@
           val thm0 = Thm.assume cprop
           val (thm1, hyps) = zip ctxt' (thm0 :: thms) t u
           val ((r1, x), y) = apfst Thm.dest_comb (Thm.dest_comb (Thm.dest_arg cprop))
-          val r2 = Thm.dest_fun2 (Thm.dest_arg (cprop_of thm1))
-          val (a1, (b1, _)) = apsnd dest_funcT (dest_funcT (ctyp_of_term r1))
-          val (a2, (b2, _)) = apsnd dest_funcT (dest_funcT (ctyp_of_term r2))
+          val r2 = Thm.dest_fun2 (Thm.dest_arg (Thm.cprop_of thm1))
+          val (a1, (b1, _)) = apsnd dest_funcT (dest_funcT (Thm.ctyp_of_term r1))
+          val (a2, (b2, _)) = apsnd dest_funcT (dest_funcT (Thm.ctyp_of_term r2))
           val tinsts = [SOME a1, SOME b1, SOME a2, SOME b2]
           val insts = [SOME (Thm.dest_arg r1), SOME (Thm.dest_arg r2)]
           val rule = Drule.instantiate' tinsts insts @{thm Rel_abs}
@@ -468,7 +468,7 @@
         end
     val r = mk_Rel (rel (fastype_of t) (fastype_of u))
     val goal = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (r $ t $ u)
-    val rename = Thm.trivial (cterm_of thy goal)
+    val rename = Thm.trivial (Thm.cterm_of thy goal)
     val (thm, hyps) = zip ctxt [] t u
   in
     Drule.implies_intr_list hyps (thm RS rename)
@@ -578,8 +578,9 @@
     val relT = @{typ "bool => bool => bool"}
     val idx = Thm.maxidx_of thm + 1
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
-    fun tinst (a, _) = (ctyp_of thy (TVar ((a, idx), @{sort type})), cbool)
-    fun inst (a, t) = (cterm_of thy (Var (Name.clean_index (prep a, idx), relT)), cterm_of thy t)
+    fun tinst (a, _) = (Thm.ctyp_of thy (TVar ((a, idx), @{sort type})), cbool)
+    fun inst (a, t) =
+      (Thm.cterm_of thy (Var (Name.clean_index (prep a, idx), relT)), Thm.cterm_of thy t)
   in
     thm
       |> Thm.generalize (tfrees, rnames @ frees) idx
@@ -603,8 +604,9 @@
     val relT = @{typ "bool => bool => bool"}
     val idx = Thm.maxidx_of thm + 1
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
-    fun tinst (a, _) = (ctyp_of thy (TVar ((a, idx), @{sort type})), cbool)
-    fun inst (a, t) = (cterm_of thy (Var (Name.clean_index (prep a, idx), relT)), cterm_of thy t)
+    fun tinst (a, _) = (Thm.ctyp_of thy (TVar ((a, idx), @{sort type})), cbool)
+    fun inst (a, t) =
+      (Thm.cterm_of thy (Var (Name.clean_index (prep a, idx), relT)), Thm.cterm_of thy t)
   in
     thm
       |> Thm.generalize (tfrees, rnames @ frees) idx
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/Transfer/transfer_bnf.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/Transfer/transfer_bnf.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/Transfer/transfer_bnf.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
 
 fun mk_pred pred_def args T =
   let
-    val pred_name = pred_def |> prop_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> fst o HOLogic.dest_eq
+    val pred_name = pred_def |> Thm.prop_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> fst o HOLogic.dest_eq
       |> head_of |> fst o dest_Const
     val argsT = map fastype_of args
   in
@@ -91,7 +91,8 @@
 
 fun generate_relation_constraint_goal ctxt bnf constraint_def =
   let
-    val constr_name = constraint_def |> prop_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> fst o HOLogic.dest_eq
+    val constr_name =
+      constraint_def |> Thm.prop_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> fst o HOLogic.dest_eq
       |> head_of |> fst o dest_Const
     val live = live_of_bnf bnf
     val (((As, Bs), Ds), ctxt) = ctxt
@@ -345,7 +346,7 @@
     val args = map mk_eq_onp preds
     val cTs = map (SOME o Proof_Context.ctyp_of lthy) (maps (replicate 2) As)
     val cts = map (SOME o Proof_Context.cterm_of lthy) args
-    fun get_rhs thm = thm |> concl_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> HOLogic.dest_eq |> snd
+    fun get_rhs thm = thm |> Thm.concl_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> HOLogic.dest_eq |> snd
     fun is_eqn thm = can get_rhs thm
     fun rel2pred_massage thm =
       let
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/choice_specification.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/choice_specification.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/choice_specification.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -17,8 +17,8 @@
 
 fun mk_definitional [] arg = arg
   | mk_definitional ((thname, cname, covld) :: cos) (thy, thm) =
-      (case HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of thm) of
-        Const (@{const_name Ex},_) $ P =>
+      (case HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of thm) of
+        Const (@{const_name Ex}, _) $ P =>
           let
             val ctype = domain_type (type_of P)
             val cname_full = Sign.intern_const thy cname
@@ -85,7 +85,7 @@
     val rew_imps = alt_props |>
       map (Object_Logic.atomize ctxt o Thm.cterm_of thy o Syntax.read_prop_global thy o snd)
     val props' = rew_imps |>
-      map (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o term_of o snd o Thm.dest_equals o cprop_of)
+      map (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.term_of o snd o Thm.dest_equals o Thm.cprop_of)
 
     fun proc_single prop =
       let
@@ -136,8 +136,8 @@
       let
         fun inst_all thy v thm =
           let
-            val cv = cterm_of thy v
-            val cT = ctyp_of_term cv
+            val cv = Thm.cterm_of thy v
+            val cT = Thm.ctyp_of_term cv
             val spec' = instantiate' [SOME cT] [NONE, SOME cv] spec
           in thm RS spec' end
         fun remove_alls frees thm = fold (inst_all (Thm.theory_of_thm thm)) frees thm
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/cnf.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/cnf.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/cnf.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
     (* adding new premises, then continues with the (i+1)-th premise   *)
     (* int -> Thm.thm -> Thm.thm *)
     fun not_disj_to_prem i thm =
-      if i > nprems_of thm then
+      if i > Thm.nprems_of thm then
         thm
       else
         not_disj_to_prem (i+1)
@@ -165,7 +165,7 @@
 (* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
 
 fun inst_thm thy ts thm =
-  instantiate' [] (map (SOME o cterm_of thy) ts) thm;
+  instantiate' [] (map (SOME o Thm.cterm_of thy) ts) thm;
 
 (* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
 (*                         Naive CNF transformation                          *)
@@ -261,12 +261,12 @@
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
     fun conv ctxt ct =
-      case term_of ct of
+      (case Thm.term_of ct of
         Const _ $ Abs _ => Conv.comb_conv (conv ctxt) ct
       | Abs _ => Conv.abs_conv (conv o snd) ctxt ct
       | Const _ => Conv.all_conv ct
-      | t => make t RS eq_reflection
-  in conv ctxt (cterm_of thy t) RS meta_eq_to_obj_eq end
+      | t => make t RS eq_reflection)
+  in conv ctxt (Thm.cterm_of thy t) RS meta_eq_to_obj_eq end
 
 fun make_nnf_thm_under_quantifiers ctxt =
   make_under_quantifiers ctxt (make_nnf_thm (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt))
@@ -293,14 +293,14 @@
 fun simp_True_False_thm thy (Const (@{const_name HOL.conj}, _) $ x $ y) =
       let
         val thm1 = simp_True_False_thm thy x
-        val x'= (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) thm1
+        val x'= (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) thm1
       in
         if x' = @{term False} then
           simp_TF_conj_False_l OF [thm1]  (* (x & y) = False *)
         else
           let
             val thm2 = simp_True_False_thm thy y
-            val y' = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) thm2
+            val y' = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) thm2
           in
             if x' = @{term True} then
               simp_TF_conj_True_l OF [thm1, thm2]  (* (x & y) = y' *)
@@ -315,14 +315,14 @@
   | simp_True_False_thm thy (Const (@{const_name HOL.disj}, _) $ x $ y) =
       let
         val thm1 = simp_True_False_thm thy x
-        val x' = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) thm1
+        val x' = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) thm1
       in
         if x' = @{term True} then
           simp_TF_disj_True_l OF [thm1]  (* (x | y) = True *)
         else
           let
             val thm2 = simp_True_False_thm thy y
-            val y' = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) thm2
+            val y' = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) thm2
           in
             if x' = @{term False} then
               simp_TF_disj_False_l OF [thm1, thm2]  (* (x | y) = y' *)
@@ -373,8 +373,8 @@
                   inst_thm thy [HOLogic.mk_disj (x', y')] iff_refl  (* (x' | y') = (x' | y') *)
             val thm1 = make_cnf_thm_from_nnf x
             val thm2 = make_cnf_thm_from_nnf y
-            val x' = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) thm1
-            val y' = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) thm2
+            val x' = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) thm1
+            val y' = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) thm2
             val disj_thm = disj_cong OF [thm1, thm2]  (* (x | y) = (x' | y') *)
           in
             iff_trans OF [disj_thm, make_cnf_disj_thm x' y']
@@ -385,10 +385,10 @@
 (*###
     val nnf_thm = make_nnf_thm thy t
 *)
-    val nnf = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) nnf_thm
+    val nnf = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) nnf_thm
     (* then simplify wrt. True/False (this should preserve NNF) *)
     val simp_thm = simp_True_False_thm thy nnf
-    val simp = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) simp_thm
+    val simp = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) simp_thm
     (* finally, convert to CNF (this should preserve the simplification) *)
     val cnf_thm = make_under_quantifiers ctxt make_cnf_thm_from_nnf simp
 (* ###
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@
                       val thm1 = inst_thm thy [x', y'] make_cnfx_disj_ex_l   (* ((Ex x') | y') = (Ex (x' | y')) *)
                       val var = new_free ()
                       val thm2 = make_cnfx_disj_thm (betapply (x', var)) y'  (* (x' | y') = body' *)
-                      val thm3 = Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy var) thm2     (* !!v. (x' | y') = body' *)
+                      val thm3 = Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy var) thm2 (* !!v. (x' | y') = body' *)
                       val thm4 = Thm.strip_shyps (thm3 COMP allI)            (* ALL v. (x' | y') = body' *)
                       val thm5 = Thm.strip_shyps (thm4 RS make_cnfx_ex_cong) (* (EX v. (x' | y')) = (EX v. body') *)
                     in
@@ -462,7 +462,7 @@
                       val thm1 = inst_thm thy [x', y'] make_cnfx_disj_ex_r   (* (x' | (Ex y')) = (Ex (x' | y')) *)
                       val var = new_free ()
                       val thm2 = make_cnfx_disj_thm x' (betapply (y', var))  (* (x' | y') = body' *)
-                      val thm3 = Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy var) thm2     (* !!v. (x' | y') = body' *)
+                      val thm3 = Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy var) thm2 (* !!v. (x' | y') = body' *)
                       val thm4 = Thm.strip_shyps (thm3 COMP allI)            (* ALL v. (x' | y') = body' *)
                       val thm5 = Thm.strip_shyps (thm4 RS make_cnfx_ex_cong) (* (EX v. (x' | y')) = (EX v. body') *)
                     in
@@ -472,8 +472,8 @@
                     inst_thm thy [HOLogic.mk_disj (x', y')] iff_refl  (* (x' | y') = (x' | y') *)
               val thm1 = make_cnfx_thm_from_nnf x
               val thm2 = make_cnfx_thm_from_nnf y
-              val x' = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) thm1
-              val y' = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) thm2
+              val x' = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) thm1
+              val y' = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) thm2
               val disj_thm = disj_cong OF [thm1, thm2]  (* (x | y) = (x' | y') *)
             in
               iff_trans OF [disj_thm, make_cnfx_disj_thm x' y']
@@ -484,7 +484,7 @@
               val var = new_free ()
               val body = HOLogic.mk_conj (HOLogic.mk_disj (x, var), HOLogic.mk_disj (y, HOLogic.Not $ var))
               val thm2 = make_cnfx_thm_from_nnf body              (* (x | v) & (y | ~v) = body' *)
-              val thm3 = Thm.forall_intr (cterm_of thy var) thm2  (* !!v. (x | v) & (y | ~v) = body' *)
+              val thm3 = Thm.forall_intr (Thm.cterm_of thy var) thm2 (* !!v. (x | v) & (y | ~v) = body' *)
               val thm4 = Thm.strip_shyps (thm3 COMP allI)         (* ALL v. (x | v) & (y | ~v) = body' *)
               val thm5 = Thm.strip_shyps (thm4 RS make_cnfx_ex_cong)  (* (EX v. (x | v) & (y | ~v)) = (EX v. body') *)
             in
@@ -496,10 +496,10 @@
 (* ###
     val nnf_thm = make_nnf_thm thy t
 *)
-    val nnf = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) nnf_thm
+    val nnf = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) nnf_thm
     (* then simplify wrt. True/False (this should preserve NNF) *)
     val simp_thm = simp_True_False_thm thy nnf
-    val simp = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) simp_thm
+    val simp = (snd o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) simp_thm
     (* initialize var_id, in case the term already contains variables of the form "cnfx_<int>" *)
     val _ = (var_id := fold (fn free => fn max =>
       let
@@ -550,7 +550,7 @@
   (* remove the original premises *)
   THEN SELECT_GOAL (fn thm =>
     let
-      val n = Logic.count_prems ((Term.strip_all_body o fst o Logic.dest_implies o prop_of) thm)
+      val n = Logic.count_prems ((Term.strip_all_body o fst o Logic.dest_implies o Thm.prop_of) thm)
     in
       PRIMITIVE (funpow (n div 2) (Seq.hd o weakening_tac ctxt 1)) thm
     end) i;
@@ -564,7 +564,7 @@
   (* cut the CNF formulas as new premises *)
   Subgoal.FOCUS (fn {prems, ...} =>
     let
-      val cnfx_thms = map (make_cnfx_thm ctxt o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) prems
+      val cnfx_thms = map (make_cnfx_thm ctxt o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) prems
       val cut_thms = map (fn (th, pr) => cnftac_eq_imp OF [th, pr]) (cnfx_thms ~~ prems)
     in
       cut_facts_tac cut_thms 1
@@ -572,7 +572,7 @@
   (* remove the original premises *)
   THEN SELECT_GOAL (fn thm =>
     let
-      val n = Logic.count_prems ((Term.strip_all_body o fst o Logic.dest_implies o prop_of) thm)
+      val n = Logic.count_prems ((Term.strip_all_body o fst o Logic.dest_implies o Thm.prop_of) thm)
     in
       PRIMITIVE (funpow (n div 2) (Seq.hd o weakening_tac ctxt 1)) thm
     end) i;
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/coinduction.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/coinduction.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/coinduction.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -24,15 +24,15 @@
 
 fun ALLGOALS_SKIP skip tac st =
   let fun doall n = if n = skip then all_tac else tac n THEN doall (n - 1)
-  in doall (nprems_of st) st  end;
+  in doall (Thm.nprems_of st) st  end;
 
 fun THEN_ALL_NEW_SKIP skip tac1 tac2 i st =
   st |> (tac1 i THEN (fn st' =>
-    Seq.INTERVAL tac2 (i + skip) (i + nprems_of st' - nprems_of st) st'));
+    Seq.INTERVAL tac2 (i + skip) (i + Thm.nprems_of st' - Thm.nprems_of st) st'));
 
 fun DELETE_PREMS_AFTER skip tac i st =
   let
-    val n = nth (prems_of st) (i - 1) |> Logic.strip_assums_hyp |> length;
+    val n = nth (Thm.prems_of st) (i - 1) |> Logic.strip_assums_hyp |> length;
   in
     (THEN_ALL_NEW_SKIP skip tac (REPEAT_DETERM_N n o eresolve0_tac [thin_rl])) i st
   end;
@@ -56,14 +56,14 @@
       Object_Logic.atomize_prems_tac ctxt THEN'
       DELETE_PREMS_AFTER skip (Subgoal.FOCUS (fn {concl, context = ctxt, params, prems, ...} =>
         let
-          val vars = raw_vars @ map (term_of o snd) params;
+          val vars = raw_vars @ map (Thm.term_of o snd) params;
           val names_ctxt = ctxt
             |> fold Variable.declare_names vars
             |> fold Variable.declare_thm (raw_thm :: prems);
           val thm_concl = Thm.cprop_of raw_thm |> strip_imp_concl;
           val (rhoTs, rhots) = Thm.match (thm_concl, concl)
-            |>> map (apply2 typ_of)
-            ||> map (apply2 term_of);
+            |>> map (apply2 Thm.typ_of)
+            ||> map (apply2 Thm.term_of);
           val xs = hd (Thm.prems_of raw_thm) |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> strip_comb |> snd
             |> map (subst_atomic_types rhoTs);
           val raw_eqs = map (fn x => (x, AList.lookup op aconv rhots x |> the)) xs;
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
             @{map 3} (fn name => fn T => fn (_, rhs) =>
               HOLogic.mk_eq (Free (name, T), rhs))
             names Ts raw_eqs;
-          val phi = eqs @ map (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) prems
+          val phi = eqs @ map (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) prems
             |> try (Library.foldr1 HOLogic.mk_conj)
             |> the_default @{term True}
             |> Ctr_Sugar_Util.list_exists_free vars
@@ -104,8 +104,9 @@
                        val inv_thms = init @ [last];
                        val eqs = take e inv_thms;
                        fun is_local_var t =
-                         member (fn (t, (_, t')) => t aconv (term_of t')) params t;
-                        val (eqs, assms') = filter_in_out (is_local_var o lhs_of_eq o prop_of) eqs;
+                         member (fn (t, (_, t')) => t aconv (Thm.term_of t')) params t;
+                        val (eqs, assms') =
+                          filter_in_out (is_local_var o lhs_of_eq o Thm.prop_of) eqs;
                         val assms = assms' @ drop e inv_thms
                       in
                         HEADGOAL (Method.insert_tac (assms @ case_prems)) THEN
@@ -114,7 +115,7 @@
         end) ctxt) THEN'
       K (prune_params_tac ctxt))
     #> Seq.maps (fn st =>
-      CASES (Rule_Cases.make_common (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt, prop_of st) cases) all_tac st)
+      CASES (Rule_Cases.make_common (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt, Thm.prop_of st) cases) all_tac st)
   end));
 
 local
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/datatype_realizer.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/datatype_realizer.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/datatype_realizer.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -27,7 +27,7 @@
 fun make_ind ({descr, rec_names, rec_rewrites, induct, ...} : Old_Datatype_Aux.info) is thy =
   let
     val ctxt = Proof_Context.init_global thy;
-    val cert = cterm_of thy;
+    val cert = Thm.cterm_of thy;
 
     val recTs = Old_Datatype_Aux.get_rec_types descr;
     val pnames =
@@ -107,7 +107,7 @@
           make_pred i U T (mk_proj i is r) (Free (tname, T)))
             (descr ~~ recTs ~~ rec_result_Ts ~~ tnames)));
     val inst = map (apply2 cert) (map head_of (HOLogic.dest_conj
-      (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of induct))) ~~ ps);
+      (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of induct))) ~~ ps);
 
     val thm =
       Goal.prove_internal ctxt (map cert prems) (cert concl)
@@ -144,7 +144,7 @@
                     (Var ((s, 0), T')) (AbsP ("H", SOME p, prf)))
                 end
             | _ => AbsP ("H", SOME p, prf)))
-          (rec_fns ~~ prems_of thm)
+          (rec_fns ~~ Thm.prems_of thm)
           (Proofterm.proof_combP
             (Reconstruct.proof_of thm', map PBound (length prems - 1 downto 0))));
 
@@ -160,7 +160,7 @@
 fun make_casedists ({index, descr, case_name, case_rewrites, exhaust, ...} : Old_Datatype_Aux.info) thy =
   let
     val ctxt = Proof_Context.init_global thy;
-    val cert = cterm_of thy;
+    val cert = Thm.cterm_of thy;
     val rT = TFree ("'P", @{sort type});
     val rT' = TVar (("'P", 0), @{sort type});
 
@@ -214,7 +214,7 @@
             (Reconstruct.proof_of thm', map PBound (length prems - 1 downto 0))));
     val prf' =
       Extraction.abs_corr_shyps thy' exhaust []
-        (map Var (Term.add_vars (prop_of exhaust) [])) (Reconstruct.proof_of exhaust);
+        (map Var (Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of exhaust) [])) (Reconstruct.proof_of exhaust);
     val r' =
       Logic.varify_global (Abs ("y", T,
         (fold_rev (Term.abs o dest_Free) rs
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/groebner.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/groebner.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/groebner.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -25,7 +25,7 @@
 
 fun is_binop ct ct' =
   (case Thm.term_of ct' of
-    c $ _ $ _ => term_of ct aconv c
+    c $ _ $ _ => Thm.term_of ct aconv c
   | _ => false);
 
 fun dest_binary ct ct' =
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@
 (* We return an ideal_conv and the actual ring prover.                       *)
 
 fun refute_disj rfn tm =
- case term_of tm of
+ case Thm.term_of tm of
   Const(@{const_name HOL.disj},_)$_$_ =>
    Drule.compose
     (refute_disj rfn (Thm.dest_arg tm), 2,
@@ -362,11 +362,11 @@
 fun mk_binop ct x y = Thm.apply (Thm.apply ct x) y
 
 fun is_neg t =
-    case term_of t of
+    case Thm.term_of t of
       (Const(@{const_name Not},_)$_) => true
     | _  => false;
 fun is_eq t =
- case term_of t of
+ case Thm.term_of t of
  (Const(@{const_name HOL.eq},_)$_$_) => true
 | _  => false;
 
@@ -387,7 +387,7 @@
 
 val strip_exists =
  let fun h (acc, t) =
-      case term_of t of
+      case Thm.term_of t of
        Const (@{const_name Ex}, _) $ Abs _ =>
         h (Thm.dest_abs NONE (Thm.dest_arg t) |>> (fn v => v::acc))
      | _ => (acc,t)
@@ -395,7 +395,7 @@
  end;
 
 fun is_forall t =
- case term_of t of
+ case Thm.term_of t of
   (Const(@{const_name All},_)$Abs(_,_,_)) => true
 | _ => false;
 
@@ -435,12 +435,12 @@
 
 fun sym_conv eq =
  let val (l,r) = Thm.dest_binop eq
- in instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of_term l)] [SOME l, SOME r] eq_commute
+ in instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of_term l)] [SOME l, SOME r] eq_commute
  end;
 
   (* FIXME : copied from cqe.ML -- complex QE*)
 fun conjuncts ct =
- case term_of ct of
+ case Thm.term_of ct of
   @{term HOL.conj}$_$_ => (Thm.dest_arg1 ct)::(conjuncts (Thm.dest_arg ct))
 | _ => [ct];
 
@@ -448,7 +448,7 @@
 
 fun mk_conj_tab th =
  let fun h acc th =
-   case prop_of th of
+   case Thm.prop_of th of
    @{term "Trueprop"}$(@{term HOL.conj}$_$_) =>
      h (h acc (th RS conjunct2)) (th RS conjunct1)
   | @{term "Trueprop"}$p => (p,th)::acc
@@ -459,7 +459,7 @@
 
 fun prove_conj tab cjs =
  case cjs of
-   [c] => if is_conj (term_of c) then prove_conj tab (conjuncts c) else tab c
+   [c] => if is_conj (Thm.term_of c) then prove_conj tab (conjuncts c) else tab c
  | c::cs => conjI OF [prove_conj tab [c], prove_conj tab cs];
 
 fun conj_ac_rule eq =
@@ -467,8 +467,8 @@
   val (l,r) = Thm.dest_equals eq
   val ctabl = mk_conj_tab (Thm.assume (Thm.apply @{cterm Trueprop} l))
   val ctabr = mk_conj_tab (Thm.assume (Thm.apply @{cterm Trueprop} r))
-  fun tabl c = the (Termtab.lookup ctabl (term_of c))
-  fun tabr c = the (Termtab.lookup ctabr (term_of c))
+  fun tabl c = the (Termtab.lookup ctabl (Thm.term_of c))
+  fun tabr c = the (Termtab.lookup ctabr (Thm.term_of c))
   val thl  = prove_conj tabl (conjuncts r) |> implies_intr_hyps
   val thr  = prove_conj tabr (conjuncts l) |> implies_intr_hyps
   val eqI = instantiate' [] [SOME l, SOME r] @{thm iffI}
@@ -479,15 +479,15 @@
    (* Conversion for the equivalence of existential statements where
       EX quantifiers are rearranged differently *)
  fun ext T = Drule.cterm_rule (instantiate' [SOME T] []) @{cpat Ex}
- fun mk_ex v t = Thm.apply (ext (ctyp_of_term v)) (Thm.lambda v t)
+ fun mk_ex v t = Thm.apply (ext (Thm.ctyp_of_term v)) (Thm.lambda v t)
 
-fun choose v th th' = case concl_of th of
+fun choose v th th' = case Thm.concl_of th of
   @{term Trueprop} $ (Const(@{const_name Ex},_)$_) =>
    let
-    val p = (funpow 2 Thm.dest_arg o cprop_of) th
-    val T = (hd o Thm.dest_ctyp o ctyp_of_term) p
+    val p = (funpow 2 Thm.dest_arg o Thm.cprop_of) th
+    val T = (hd o Thm.dest_ctyp o Thm.ctyp_of_term) p
     val th0 = Conv.fconv_rule (Thm.beta_conversion true)
-        (instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME p, (SOME o Thm.dest_arg o cprop_of) th'] exE)
+        (instantiate' [SOME T] [SOME p, (SOME o Thm.dest_arg o Thm.cprop_of) th'] exE)
     val pv = (Thm.rhs_of o Thm.beta_conversion true)
           (Thm.apply @{cterm Trueprop} (Thm.apply p v))
     val th1 = Thm.forall_intr v (Thm.implies_intr pv th')
@@ -504,7 +504,7 @@
    val p = Thm.lambda v (Thm.dest_arg (Thm.cprop_of th))
   in Thm.implies_elim
     (Conv.fconv_rule (Thm.beta_conversion true)
-      (instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of_term v)] [SOME p, SOME v] @{thm exI}))
+      (instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of_term v)] [SOME p, SOME v] @{thm exI}))
       th
   end
  fun ex_eq_conv t =
@@ -515,19 +515,19 @@
    val th = Thm.assume (Thm.apply @{cterm Trueprop} P)
    val th1 = implies_intr_hyps (fold simple_choose vs' (fold mkexi vs th))
    val th2 = implies_intr_hyps (fold simple_choose vs (fold mkexi vs' th))
-   val p = (Thm.dest_arg o Thm.dest_arg1 o cprop_of) th1
-   val q = (Thm.dest_arg o Thm.dest_arg o cprop_of) th1
+   val p = (Thm.dest_arg o Thm.dest_arg1 o Thm.cprop_of) th1
+   val q = (Thm.dest_arg o Thm.dest_arg o Thm.cprop_of) th1
   in Thm.implies_elim (Thm.implies_elim (instantiate' [] [SOME p, SOME q] iffI) th1) th2
      |> mk_meta_eq
   end;
 
 
- fun getname v = case term_of v of
+ fun getname v = case Thm.term_of v of
   Free(s,_) => s
  | Var ((s,_),_) => s
  | _ => "x"
  fun mk_eq s t = Thm.apply (Thm.apply @{cterm "op == :: bool => _"} s) t
-  fun mk_exists v th = Drule.arg_cong_rule (ext (ctyp_of_term v))
+  fun mk_exists v th = Drule.arg_cong_rule (ext (Thm.ctyp_of_term v))
    (Thm.abstract_rule (getname v) v th)
  fun simp_ex_conv ctxt =
    Simplifier.rewrite (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt addsimps @{thms simp_thms(39)})
@@ -567,13 +567,13 @@
      if length ideal = 2 then ideal else [eq_commute, eq_commute]
   fun ring_dest_neg t =
     let val (l,r) = Thm.dest_comb t
-    in if Term.could_unify(term_of l,term_of ring_neg_tm) then r
+    in if Term.could_unify(Thm.term_of l, Thm.term_of ring_neg_tm) then r
        else raise CTERM ("ring_dest_neg", [t])
     end
 
  fun field_dest_inv t =
     let val (l,r) = Thm.dest_comb t in
-        if Term.could_unify(term_of l, term_of field_inv_tm) then r
+        if Term.could_unify (Thm.term_of l, Thm.term_of field_inv_tm) then r
         else raise CTERM ("field_dest_inv", [t])
     end
  val ring_dest_add = dest_binary ring_add_tm;
@@ -633,7 +633,7 @@
           end)
          handle CTERM _ =>
           ((let val (l,r) = ring_dest_pow tm
-          in grob_pow vars (grobify_term vars l) ((term_of #> HOLogic.dest_number #> snd) r)
+          in grob_pow vars (grobify_term vars l) ((Thm.term_of #> HOLogic.dest_number #> snd) r)
           end)
            handle CTERM _ => error "grobify_term: unknown or invalid term")))))))));
 val eq_tm = idom_thm |> concl |> Thm.dest_arg |> Thm.dest_arg |> Thm.dest_fun2;
@@ -649,7 +649,7 @@
   val cjs = conjs tm
   val  rawvars =
     fold_rev (fn eq => fn a => grobvars (Thm.dest_arg1 eq) (grobvars (Thm.dest_arg eq) a)) cjs []
-  val vars = sort (fn (x, y) => Term_Ord.term_ord (term_of x, term_of y))
+  val vars = sort (fn (x, y) => Term_Ord.term_ord (Thm.term_of x, Thm.term_of y))
                   (distinct (op aconvc) rawvars)
  in (vars,map (grobify_equation vars) cjs)
  end;
@@ -739,7 +739,7 @@
  let
   fun mk_forall x p =
     Thm.apply
-      (Drule.cterm_rule (instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of_term x)] [])
+      (Drule.cterm_rule (instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of_term x)] [])
         @{cpat "All:: (?'a => bool) => _"}) (Thm.lambda x p)
   val avs = Thm.add_cterm_frees tm []
   val P' = fold mk_forall avs tm
@@ -756,7 +756,7 @@
     val th3 =
       Thm.equal_elim
         (Simplifier.rewrite (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt addsimps [not_ex RS sym])
-          (th2 |> cprop_of)) th2
+          (th2 |> Thm.cprop_of)) th2
     in specl avs
              ([[[mk_object_eq th1, th3 RS PFalse'] MRS trans] MRS PFalse] MRS notnotD)
    end
@@ -764,7 +764,7 @@
 fun ideal tms tm ord =
  let
   val rawvars = fold_rev grobvars (tm::tms) []
-  val vars = sort ord (distinct (fn (x,y) => (term_of x) aconv (term_of y)) rawvars)
+  val vars = sort ord (distinct (fn (x,y) => (Thm.term_of x) aconv (Thm.term_of y)) rawvars)
   val pols = map (grobify_term vars) tms
   val pol = grobify_term vars tm
   val cert = grobner_ideal vars pols pol
@@ -866,7 +866,7 @@
   val vars = filter (fn v => free_in v eq) evs
   val (qs,p) = isolate_monomials vars eq
   val rs = ideal (qs @ ps) p
-              (fn (s,t) => Term_Ord.term_ord (term_of s, term_of t))
+              (fn (s,t) => Term_Ord.term_ord (Thm.term_of s, Thm.term_of t))
  in (eq, take (length qs) rs ~~ vars)
  end;
  fun subst_in_poly i p = Thm.rhs_of (ring_normalize_conv (vsubst i p));
@@ -888,7 +888,7 @@
 
 
 fun find_term bounds tm =
-  (case term_of tm of
+  (case Thm.term_of tm of
     Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, T) $ _ $ _ =>
       if domain_type T = HOLogic.boolT then find_args bounds tm
       else Thm.dest_arg tm
@@ -919,7 +919,7 @@
   | SOME (res as (theory, {is_const = _, dest_const,
           mk_const, conv = ring_eq_conv})) =>
      SOME (ring_and_ideal_conv theory
-          dest_const (mk_const (ctyp_of_term tm)) (ring_eq_conv ctxt)
+          dest_const (mk_const (Thm.ctyp_of_term tm)) (ring_eq_conv ctxt)
           (Semiring_Normalizer.semiring_normalize_wrapper ctxt res)))
 
 fun presimplify ctxt add_thms del_thms =
@@ -941,11 +941,11 @@
         | THM _ => no_tac);
 
 local
- fun lhs t = case term_of t of
+ fun lhs t = case Thm.term_of t of
   Const(@{const_name HOL.eq},_)$_$_ => Thm.dest_arg1 t
  | _=> raise CTERM ("ideal_tac - lhs",[t])
  fun exitac NONE = no_tac
-   | exitac (SOME y) = rtac (instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of_term y)] [NONE,SOME y] exI) 1
+   | exitac (SOME y) = rtac (instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of_term y)] [NONE,SOME y] exI) 1
 
  val claset = claset_of @{context}
 in
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/inductive.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/inductive.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/inductive.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -260,7 +260,7 @@
     fun dest_less_concl thm = dest_less_concl (thm RS @{thm le_funD})
       handle THM _ => thm RS @{thm le_boolD}
   in
-    (case concl_of thm of
+    (case Thm.concl_of thm of
       Const (@{const_name Pure.eq}, _) $ _ $ _ => eq_to_mono (thm RS meta_eq_to_obj_eq)
     | _ $ (Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ _ $ _) => eq_to_mono thm
     | _ $ (Const (@{const_name Orderings.less_eq}, _) $ _ $ _) =>
@@ -636,7 +636,7 @@
       | _ => error
         ("equations matching pattern " ^ Syntax.string_of_term ctxt prop ^ " is not unique"));
     val inst =
-      map (fn v => (cterm_of thy (Var v), cterm_of thy (Envir.subst_term subst (Var v))))
+      map (fn v => (Thm.cterm_of thy (Var v), Thm.cterm_of thy (Envir.subst_term subst (Var v))))
         (Term.add_vars (lhs_of eq) []);
   in
     Drule.cterm_instantiate inst eq
@@ -1101,12 +1101,12 @@
 fun arities_of induct =
   map (fn (_ $ t $ u) =>
       (fst (dest_Const (head_of t)), length (snd (strip_comb u))))
-    (HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of induct)));
+    (HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of induct)));
 
 (* read off parameters of inductive predicate from raw induction rule *)
 fun params_of induct =
   let
-    val (_ $ t $ u :: _) = HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of induct));
+    val (_ $ t $ u :: _) = HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of induct));
     val (_, ts) = strip_comb t;
     val (_, us) = strip_comb u;
   in
@@ -1114,7 +1114,7 @@
   end;
 
 val pname_of_intr =
-  concl_of #> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop #> head_of #> dest_Const #> fst;
+  Thm.concl_of #> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop #> head_of #> dest_Const #> fst;
 
 (* partition introduction rules according to predicate name *)
 fun gen_partition_rules f induct intros =
@@ -1131,9 +1131,9 @@
 (* infer order of variables in intro rules from order of quantifiers in elim rule *)
 fun infer_intro_vars elim arity intros =
   let
-    val thy = theory_of_thm elim;
-    val _ :: cases = prems_of elim;
-    val used = map (fst o fst) (Term.add_vars (prop_of elim) []);
+    val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm elim;
+    val _ :: cases = Thm.prems_of elim;
+    val used = map (fst o fst) (Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of elim) []);
     fun mtch (t, u) =
       let
         val params = Logic.strip_params t;
@@ -1150,7 +1150,7 @@
         map (Envir.subst_term tab) vars
       end
   in
-    map (mtch o apsnd prop_of) (cases ~~ intros)
+    map (mtch o apsnd Thm.prop_of) (cases ~~ intros)
   end;
 
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/inductive_realizer.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/inductive_realizer.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/inductive_realizer.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -58,16 +58,16 @@
 
 fun dt_of_intrs thy vs nparms intrs =
   let
-    val iTs = rev (Term.add_tvars (prop_of (hd intrs)) []);
+    val iTs = rev (Term.add_tvars (Thm.prop_of (hd intrs)) []);
     val (Const (s, _), ts) = strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop
-      (Logic.strip_imp_concl (prop_of (hd intrs))));
+      (Logic.strip_imp_concl (Thm.prop_of (hd intrs))));
     val params = map dest_Var (take nparms ts);
     val tname = Binding.name (space_implode "_" (Long_Name.base_name s ^ "T" :: vs));
     fun constr_of_intr intr = (Binding.name (Long_Name.base_name (name_of_thm intr)),
-      map (Logic.unvarifyT_global o snd) (subtract (op =) params (rev (Term.add_vars (prop_of intr) []))) @
-        filter_out (equal Extraction.nullT) (map
-          (Logic.unvarifyT_global o Extraction.etype_of thy vs []) (prems_of intr)),
-            NoSyn);
+      map (Logic.unvarifyT_global o snd)
+        (subtract (op =) params (rev (Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of intr) []))) @
+      filter_out (equal Extraction.nullT)
+        (map (Logic.unvarifyT_global o Extraction.etype_of thy vs []) (Thm.prems_of intr)), NoSyn);
   in
     ((tname, map (rpair dummyS) (map (fn a => "'" ^ a) vs @ map (fst o fst) iTs), NoSyn),
       map constr_of_intr intrs)
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
 
 fun mk_realizes_eqn n vs nparms intrs =
   let
-    val intr = map_types Type.strip_sorts (prop_of (hd intrs));
+    val intr = map_types Type.strip_sorts (Thm.prop_of (hd intrs));
     val concl = HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_imp_concl intr);
     val iTs = rev (Term.add_tvars intr []);
     val Tvs = map TVar iTs;
@@ -138,7 +138,7 @@
     val ctxt = Proof_Context.init_global thy
     val args = map (Free o apfst fst o dest_Var) ivs;
     val args' = map (Free o apfst fst)
-      (subtract (op =) params (Term.add_vars (prop_of intr) []));
+      (subtract (op =) params (Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of intr) []));
     val rule' = strip_all rule;
     val conclT = Extraction.etype_of thy vs [] (Logic.strip_imp_concl rule');
     val used = map (fst o dest_Free) args;
@@ -203,10 +203,10 @@
 
 fun indrule_realizer thy induct raw_induct rsets params vs rec_names rss intrs dummies =
   let
-    val concls = HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of raw_induct));
+    val concls = HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of raw_induct));
     val premss = map_filter (fn (s, rs) => if member (op =) rsets s then
-      SOME (rs, map (fn (_, r) => nth (prems_of raw_induct)
-        (find_index (fn prp => prp = prop_of r) (map prop_of intrs))) rs) else NONE) rss;
+      SOME (rs, map (fn (_, r) => nth (Thm.prems_of raw_induct)
+        (find_index (fn prp => prp = Thm.prop_of r) (map Thm.prop_of intrs))) rs) else NONE) rss;
     val fs = maps (fn ((intrs, prems), dummy) =>
       let
         val fs = map (fn (rule, (ivs, intr)) =>
@@ -257,13 +257,13 @@
 
 fun mk_realizer thy vs (name, rule, rrule, rlz, rt) =
   let
-    val rvs = map fst (relevant_vars (prop_of rule));
-    val xs = rev (Term.add_vars (prop_of rule) []);
+    val rvs = map fst (relevant_vars (Thm.prop_of rule));
+    val xs = rev (Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of rule) []);
     val vs1 = map Var (filter_out (fn ((a, _), _) => member (op =) rvs a) xs);
-    val rlzvs = rev (Term.add_vars (prop_of rrule) []);
+    val rlzvs = rev (Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of rrule) []);
     val vs2 = map (fn (ixn, _) => Var (ixn, (the o AList.lookup (op =) rlzvs) ixn)) xs;
     val rs = map Var (subtract (op = o apply2 fst) xs rlzvs);
-    val rlz' = fold_rev Logic.all rs (prop_of rrule)
+    val rlz' = fold_rev Logic.all rs (Thm.prop_of rrule)
   in (name, (vs,
     if rt = Extraction.nullt then rt else fold_rev lambda vs1 rt,
     Extraction.abs_corr_shyps thy rule vs vs2
@@ -277,7 +277,7 @@
   let
     val qualifier = Long_Name.qualifier (name_of_thm induct);
     val inducts = Global_Theory.get_thms thy (Long_Name.qualify qualifier "inducts");
-    val iTs = rev (Term.add_tvars (prop_of (hd intrs)) []);
+    val iTs = rev (Term.add_tvars (Thm.prop_of (hd intrs)) []);
     val ar = length vs + length iTs;
     val params = Inductive.params_of raw_induct;
     val arities = Inductive.arities_of raw_induct;
@@ -317,21 +317,21 @@
       if null dt_names then []
       else #rec_rewrites (Old_Datatype_Data.the_info thy2 (hd dt_names));
     val rec_names = distinct (op =) (map (fst o dest_Const o head_of o fst o
-      HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) rec_thms);
+      HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) rec_thms);
     val (constrss, _) = fold_map (fn (s, rs) => fn (recs, dummies) =>
       if member (op =) rsets s then
         let
           val (d :: dummies') = dummies;
           val (recs1, recs2) = chop (length rs) (if d then tl recs else recs)
         in (map (head_of o hd o rev o snd o strip_comb o fst o
-          HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of) recs1, (recs2, dummies'))
+          HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) recs1, (recs2, dummies'))
         end
       else (replicate (length rs) Extraction.nullt, (recs, dummies)))
         rss (rec_thms, dummies);
     val rintrs = map (fn (intr, c) => attach_typeS (Envir.eta_contract
       (Extraction.realizes_of thy2 vs
         (if c = Extraction.nullt then c else list_comb (c, map Var (rev
-          (subtract (op =) params' (Term.add_vars (prop_of intr) []))))) (prop_of intr))))
+          (subtract (op =) params' (Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of intr) []))))) (Thm.prop_of intr))))
             (maps snd rss ~~ flat constrss);
     val (rlzpreds, rlzpreds') =
       rintrs |> map (fn rintr =>
@@ -365,17 +365,17 @@
 
     val Ps = map_filter (fn _ $ M $ P => if member (op =) rsets (pred_of M) then
       SOME (fst (fst (dest_Var (head_of P)))) else NONE)
-        (HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of raw_induct)));
+        (HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of raw_induct)));
 
     fun add_ind_realizer Ps thy =
       let
         val vs' = rename (map (apply2 (fst o fst o dest_Var))
           (params ~~ List.take (snd (strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop
-            (hd (prems_of (hd inducts))))), nparms))) vs;
+            (hd (Thm.prems_of (hd inducts))))), nparms))) vs;
         val rs = indrule_realizer thy induct raw_induct rsets params'
           (vs' @ Ps) rec_names rss' intrs dummies;
         val rlzs = map (fn (r, ind) => Extraction.realizes_of thy (vs' @ Ps) r
-          (prop_of ind)) (rs ~~ inducts);
+          (Thm.prop_of ind)) (rs ~~ inducts);
         val used = fold Term.add_free_names rlzs [];
         val rnames = Name.variant_list used (replicate (length inducts) "r");
         val rnames' = Name.variant_list
@@ -421,24 +421,24 @@
     (** realizer for elimination rules **)
 
     val case_names = map (fst o dest_Const o head_of o fst o HOLogic.dest_eq o
-      HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o prop_of o hd) case_thms;
+      HOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of o hd) case_thms;
 
     fun add_elim_realizer Ps
       (((((elim, elimR), intrs), case_thms), case_name), dummy) thy =
       let
-        val (prem :: prems) = prems_of elim;
+        val (prem :: prems) = Thm.prems_of elim;
         fun reorder1 (p, (_, intr)) =
           fold (fn ((s, _), T) => Logic.all (Free (s, T)))
-            (subtract (op =) params' (Term.add_vars (prop_of intr) []))
+            (subtract (op =) params' (Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of intr) []))
             (strip_all p);
         fun reorder2 ((ivs, intr), i) =
-          let val fs = subtract (op =) params' (Term.add_vars (prop_of intr) [])
+          let val fs = subtract (op =) params' (Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of intr) [])
           in fold (lambda o Var) fs (list_comb (Bound (i + length ivs), ivs)) end;
         val p = Logic.list_implies
-          (map reorder1 (prems ~~ intrs) @ [prem], concl_of elim);
+          (map reorder1 (prems ~~ intrs) @ [prem], Thm.concl_of elim);
         val T' = Extraction.etype_of thy (vs @ Ps) [] p;
         val T = if dummy then (HOLogic.unitT --> body_type T') --> T' else T';
-        val Ts = map (Extraction.etype_of thy (vs @ Ps) []) (prems_of elim);
+        val Ts = map (Extraction.etype_of thy (vs @ Ps) []) (Thm.prems_of elim);
         val r =
           if null Ps then Extraction.nullt
           else
@@ -449,7 +449,7 @@
                  else []) @
                 map reorder2 (intrs ~~ (length prems - 1 downto 0)) @
                 [Bound (length prems)]));
-        val rlz = Extraction.realizes_of thy (vs @ Ps) r (prop_of elim);
+        val rlz = Extraction.realizes_of thy (vs @ Ps) r (Thm.prop_of elim);
         val rlz' = attach_typeS (strip_all (Logic.unvarify_global rlz));
         val rews = map mk_meta_eq case_thms;
         val thm = Goal.prove_global thy []
@@ -474,7 +474,7 @@
     val thy5 = Extraction.add_realizers_i
       (map (mk_realizer thy4 vs) (map (fn (((rule, rrule), rlz), c) =>
          (name_of_thm rule, rule, rrule, rlz,
-            list_comb (c, map Var (subtract (op =) params' (rev (Term.add_vars (prop_of rule) []))))))
+            list_comb (c, map Var (subtract (op =) params' (rev (Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of rule) []))))))
               (maps snd rss ~~ #intrs ind_info ~~ rintrs ~~ flat constrss))) thy4;
     val elimps = map_filter (fn ((s, intrs), p) =>
       if member (op =) rsets s then SOME (p, intrs) else NONE)
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@
     val thy6 =
       fold (fn p as (((((elim, _), _), _), _), _) =>
         add_elim_realizer [] p #>
-        add_elim_realizer [fst (fst (dest_Var (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of elim))))] p)
+        add_elim_realizer [fst (fst (dest_Var (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of elim))))] p)
       (elimps ~~ case_thms ~~ case_names ~~ dummies) thy5;
 
   in Sign.restore_naming thy thy6 end;
@@ -492,7 +492,7 @@
     val (_, {intrs, induct, raw_induct, elims, ...}) =
       Inductive.the_inductive (Proof_Context.init_global thy) name;
     val vss = sort (int_ord o apply2 length)
-      (subsets (map fst (relevant_vars (concl_of (hd intrs)))))
+      (subsets (map fst (relevant_vars (Thm.concl_of (hd intrs)))))
   in
     fold_rev (add_ind_realizer rsets intrs induct raw_induct elims) vss thy
   end
@@ -501,8 +501,8 @@
   let
     fun err () = error "ind_realizer: bad rule";
     val sets =
-      (case HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of thm)) of
-           [_] => [pred_of (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (hd (prems_of thm)))]
+      (case HOLogic.dest_conj (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of thm)) of
+           [_] => [pred_of (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (hd (Thm.prems_of thm)))]
          | xs => map (pred_of o fst o HOLogic.dest_imp) xs)
          handle TERM _ => err () | List.Empty => err ();
   in 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/inductive_set.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/inductive_set.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/inductive_set.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -44,7 +44,7 @@
       val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt;
       fun close p t f =
         let val vs = Term.add_vars t []
-        in Drule.instantiate' [] (rev (map (SOME o cterm_of thy o Var) vs))
+        in Drule.instantiate' [] (rev (map (SOME o Thm.cterm_of thy o Var) vs))
           (p (fold (Logic.all o Var) vs t) f)
         end;
       fun mkop @{const_name HOL.conj} T x =
@@ -93,8 +93,8 @@
             in
               if forall is_none rews then NONE
               else SOME (fold (fn th1 => fn th2 => Thm.combination th2 th1)
-                (map2 (fn SOME r => K r | NONE => Thm.reflexive o cterm_of thy)
-                   rews ts) (Thm.reflexive (cterm_of thy h)))
+                (map2 (fn SOME r => K r | NONE => Thm.reflexive o Thm.cterm_of thy)
+                   rews ts) (Thm.reflexive (Thm.cterm_of thy h)))
             end
         | NONE => NONE)
       | _ => NONE
@@ -117,7 +117,7 @@
   Conv.fconv_rule (Conv.then_conv (Thm.beta_conversion true, fn ct =>
     Thm.transitive (Thm.eta_conversion ct)
       (Thm.symmetric (Thm.eta_conversion
-        (cterm_of (theory_of_cterm ct) (eta_contract p (term_of ct)))))));
+        (Thm.cterm_of (Thm.theory_of_cterm ct) (eta_contract p (Thm.term_of ct)))))));
 
 
 (***********************************************************)
@@ -208,8 +208,8 @@
       val x' = map_type
         (K (Ts @ HOLogic.strip_ptupleT ps U ---> HOLogic.boolT)) x;
     in
-      (cterm_of thy x,
-       cterm_of thy (fold_rev (Term.abs o pair "x") Ts
+      (Thm.cterm_of thy x,
+       Thm.cterm_of thy (fold_rev (Term.abs o pair "x") Ts
          (HOLogic.Collect_const U $
             HOLogic.mk_psplits ps U HOLogic.boolT
               (list_comb (x', map Bound (length Ts - 1 downto 0))))))
@@ -217,7 +217,7 @@
 
 fun mk_to_pred_eq ctxt p fs optfs' T thm =
   let
-    val thy = theory_of_thm thm;
+    val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm thm;
     val insts = mk_to_pred_inst thy fs;
     val thm' = Thm.instantiate ([], insts) thm;
     val thm'' =
@@ -229,11 +229,11 @@
             val Ts = HOLogic.strip_ptupleT fs' U;
             (* FIXME: should cterm_instantiate increment indexes? *)
             val arg_cong' = Thm.incr_indexes (Thm.maxidx_of thm + 1) arg_cong;
-            val (arg_cong_f, _) = arg_cong' |> cprop_of |> Drule.strip_imp_concl |>
+            val (arg_cong_f, _) = arg_cong' |> Thm.cprop_of |> Drule.strip_imp_concl |>
               Thm.dest_comb |> snd |> Drule.strip_comb |> snd |> hd |> Thm.dest_comb
           in
             thm' RS (Drule.cterm_instantiate [(arg_cong_f,
-              cterm_of thy (Abs ("P", Ts ---> HOLogic.boolT,
+              Thm.cterm_of thy (Abs ("P", Ts ---> HOLogic.boolT,
                 HOLogic.Collect_const U $ HOLogic.mk_psplits fs' U
                   HOLogic.boolT (Bound 0))))] arg_cong' RS sym)
           end)
@@ -249,7 +249,7 @@
 exception Malformed of string;
 
 fun add context thm (tab as {to_set_simps, to_pred_simps, set_arities, pred_arities}) =
-  (case prop_of thm of
+  (case Thm.prop_of thm of
     Const (@{const_name Trueprop}, _) $ (Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, Type (_, [T, _])) $ lhs $ rhs) =>
       (case body_type T of
          @{typ bool} =>
@@ -318,7 +318,8 @@
   let val rules' = map mk_meta_eq rules
   in
     Simplifier.simproc_global_i @{theory HOL} "to_pred" [anyt]
-      (fn ctxt => (lookup_rule (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt) (prop_of #> Logic.dest_equals) rules'))
+      (fn ctxt =>
+        lookup_rule (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt) (Thm.prop_of #> Logic.dest_equals) rules')
   end;
 
 fun to_pred_proc thy rules t = case lookup_rule thy I rules t of
@@ -334,7 +335,7 @@
     val {to_pred_simps, set_arities, pred_arities, ...} =
       fold (add context) thms (Data.get context);
     val fs = filter (is_Var o fst)
-      (infer_arities thy set_arities (NONE, prop_of thm) []);
+      (infer_arities thy set_arities (NONE, Thm.prop_of thm) []);
     (* instantiate each set parameter with {(x, y). p x y} *)
     val insts = mk_to_pred_inst thy fs
   in
@@ -358,7 +359,7 @@
     val {to_set_simps, pred_arities, ...} =
       fold (add context) thms (Data.get context);
     val fs = filter (is_Var o fst)
-      (infer_arities thy pred_arities (NONE, prop_of thm) []);
+      (infer_arities thy pred_arities (NONE, Thm.prop_of thm) []);
     (* instantiate each predicate parameter with %x y. (x, y) : s *)
     val insts = map (fn (x, ps) =>
       let
@@ -369,8 +370,8 @@
         val T = HOLogic.mk_ptupleT ps Us;
         val x' = map_type (K (Rs ---> HOLogic.mk_setT T)) x
       in
-        (cterm_of thy x,
-         cterm_of thy (fold_rev (Term.abs o pair "x") Ts
+        (Thm.cterm_of thy x,
+         Thm.cterm_of thy (fold_rev (Term.abs o pair "x") Ts
           (HOLogic.mk_mem (HOLogic.mk_ptuple ps T (map Bound (k downto 0)),
              list_comb (x', map Bound (l - 1 downto k + 1))))))
       end) fs;
@@ -397,7 +398,7 @@
       if exists_Const (fn (s, _) => case Symtab.lookup set_arities s of
           NONE => false
         | SOME arities => exists (fn (_, (xs, _)) =>
-            forall is_none xs) arities) (prop_of thm)
+            forall is_none xs) arities) (Thm.prop_of thm)
       then
         thm |>
         Simplifier.full_simplify (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt addsimprocs
@@ -465,7 +466,7 @@
             (list_comb (c', params1))))
       end) |> split_list |>> split_list;
     val eqns' = eqns @
-      map (prop_of #> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop #> HOLogic.dest_eq)
+      map (Thm.prop_of #> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop #> HOLogic.dest_eq)
         (mem_Collect_eq :: @{thm split_conv} :: to_pred_simps);
 
     (* predicate version of the introduction rules *)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/int_arith.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/int_arith.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/int_arith.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -25,8 +25,8 @@
 val lhss0 = [@{cpat "0::?'a::ring"}];
 
 fun proc0 phi ctxt ct =
-  let val T = ctyp_of_term ct
-  in if typ_of T = @{typ int} then NONE else
+  let val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term ct
+  in if Thm.typ_of T = @{typ int} then NONE else
      SOME (instantiate' [SOME T] [] zeroth)
   end;
 
@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@
 val lhss1 = [@{cpat "1::?'a::ring_1"}];
 
 fun proc1 phi ctxt ct =
-  let val T = ctyp_of_term ct
-  in if typ_of T = @{typ int} then NONE else
+  let val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term ct
+  in if Thm.typ_of T = @{typ int} then NONE else
      SOME (instantiate' [SOME T] [] oneth)
   end;
 
@@ -67,7 +67,7 @@
      addsimprocs [zero_to_of_int_zero_simproc,one_to_of_int_one_simproc]);
 
 fun sproc phi ctxt ct =
-  if check (term_of ct) then SOME (Simplifier.rewrite (put_simpset conv_ss ctxt) ct)
+  if check (Thm.term_of ct) then SOME (Simplifier.rewrite (put_simpset conv_ss ctxt) ct)
   else NONE;
 
 val lhss' =
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/legacy_transfer.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/legacy_transfer.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/legacy_transfer.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -21,7 +21,7 @@
 
 (* data administration *)
 
-val direction_of = Thm.dest_binop o Thm.dest_arg o cprop_of;
+val direction_of = Thm.dest_binop o Thm.dest_arg o Thm.cprop_of;
 
 val transfer_morphism_key = Drule.strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of @{thm transfer_morphismI});
 
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
     val tys = map snd (Term.add_vars t []);
     val _ = if null tys then error "Transfer: unable to guess instance" else ();
     val tyss = splits (curry Type.could_unify) tys;
-    val get_ty = typ_of o ctyp_of_term o fst o direction_of;
+    val get_ty = Thm.typ_of o Thm.ctyp_of_term o fst o direction_of;
     val insts = map_filter (fn tys => get_first (fn (k, e) =>
       if Type.could_unify (hd tys, range_type (get_ty k))
       then SOME (direction_of k, transfer_rules_of e)
@@ -114,8 +114,8 @@
     (* determine variables to transfer *)
     val ctxt3 = ctxt2
       |> Variable.declare_thm thm
-      |> Variable.declare_term (term_of a)
-      |> Variable.declare_term (term_of D);
+      |> Variable.declare_term (Thm.term_of a)
+      |> Variable.declare_term (Thm.term_of D);
     val vars = filter (fn ((v, _), T) => Type.could_unify (T, aT) andalso
       not (member (op =) leave v)) (Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of thm) []);
     val c_vars = map (Proof_Context.cterm_of ctxt3 o Var) vars;
@@ -131,7 +131,7 @@
       |> fold Simplifier.add_cong cong;
     val thm' = thm
       |> Drule.cterm_instantiate (c_vars ~~ c_exprs')
-      |> fold_rev Thm.implies_intr (map cprop_of hyps)
+      |> fold_rev Thm.implies_intr (map Thm.cprop_of hyps)
       |> Simplifier.asm_full_simplify simpset
   in singleton (Variable.export ctxt5 ctxt1) thm' end;
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/lin_arith.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/lin_arith.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/lin_arith.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -62,8 +62,8 @@
 
 fun mk_nat_thm thy t =
   let
-    val cn = cterm_of thy (Var (("n", 0), HOLogic.natT))
-    and ct = cterm_of thy t
+    val cn = Thm.cterm_of thy (Var (("n", 0), HOLogic.natT))
+    and ct = Thm.cterm_of thy t
   in Drule.instantiate_normalize ([], [(cn, ct)]) @{thm le0} end;
 
 end;
@@ -288,7 +288,7 @@
 (* checks if splitting with 'thm' is implemented                             *)
 
 fun is_split_thm ctxt thm =
-  (case concl_of thm of _ $ (_ $ (_ $ lhs) $ _) =>
+  (case Thm.concl_of thm of _ $ (_ $ (_ $ lhs) $ _) =>
     (* Trueprop $ ((op =) $ (?P $ lhs) $ rhs) *)
     (case head_of lhs of
       Const (a, _) =>
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/nat_numeral_simprocs.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/nat_numeral_simprocs.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/nat_numeral_simprocs.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -216,10 +216,10 @@
   val bal_add2 = @{thm nat_diff_add_eq2} RS trans
 );
 
-fun eq_cancel_numerals ctxt ct = EqCancelNumerals.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun less_cancel_numerals ctxt ct = LessCancelNumerals.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun le_cancel_numerals ctxt ct = LeCancelNumerals.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun diff_cancel_numerals ctxt ct = DiffCancelNumerals.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
+fun eq_cancel_numerals ctxt ct = EqCancelNumerals.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun less_cancel_numerals ctxt ct = LessCancelNumerals.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun le_cancel_numerals ctxt ct = LeCancelNumerals.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun diff_cancel_numerals ctxt ct = DiffCancelNumerals.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
 
 
 (*** Applying CombineNumeralsFun ***)
@@ -257,7 +257,7 @@
 
 structure CombineNumerals = CombineNumeralsFun(CombineNumeralsData);
 
-fun combine_numerals ctxt ct = CombineNumerals.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
+fun combine_numerals ctxt ct = CombineNumerals.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
 
 
 (*** Applying CancelNumeralFactorFun ***)
@@ -326,11 +326,11 @@
   val neg_exchanges = true
 )
 
-fun eq_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = EqCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun less_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = LessCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun le_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = LeCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun div_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = DivCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun dvd_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = DvdCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
+fun eq_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = EqCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun less_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = LessCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun le_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = LeCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun div_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = DivCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun dvd_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = DvdCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
 
 
 (*** Applying ExtractCommonTermFun ***)
@@ -405,10 +405,10 @@
   fun simp_conv _ _ = SOME @{thm nat_mult_dvd_cancel_disj}
 );
 
-fun eq_cancel_factor ctxt ct = EqCancelFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun less_cancel_factor ctxt ct = LessCancelFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun le_cancel_factor ctxt ct = LeCancelFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun div_cancel_factor ctxt ct = DivideCancelFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun dvd_cancel_factor ctxt ct = DvdCancelFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
+fun eq_cancel_factor ctxt ct = EqCancelFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun less_cancel_factor ctxt ct = LessCancelFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun le_cancel_factor ctxt ct = LeCancelFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun div_cancel_factor ctxt ct = DivideCancelFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun dvd_cancel_factor ctxt ct = DvdCancelFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
 
 end;
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/numeral_simprocs.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/numeral_simprocs.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/numeral_simprocs.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -288,9 +288,9 @@
   val bal_add2 = @{thm le_add_iff2} RS trans
 );
 
-fun eq_cancel_numerals ctxt ct = EqCancelNumerals.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun less_cancel_numerals ctxt ct = LessCancelNumerals.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun le_cancel_numerals ctxt ct = LeCancelNumerals.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
+fun eq_cancel_numerals ctxt ct = EqCancelNumerals.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun less_cancel_numerals ctxt ct = LessCancelNumerals.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun le_cancel_numerals ctxt ct = LeCancelNumerals.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
 
 structure CombineNumeralsData =
 struct
@@ -350,9 +350,9 @@
 
 structure FieldCombineNumerals = CombineNumeralsFun(FieldCombineNumeralsData);
 
-fun combine_numerals ctxt ct = CombineNumerals.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
+fun combine_numerals ctxt ct = CombineNumerals.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
 
-fun field_combine_numerals ctxt ct = FieldCombineNumerals.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
+fun field_combine_numerals ctxt ct = FieldCombineNumerals.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
 
 
 (** Constant folding for multiplication in semirings **)
@@ -368,7 +368,7 @@
 
 structure Semiring_Times_Assoc = Assoc_Fold (Semiring_Times_Assoc_Data);
 
-fun assoc_fold ctxt ct = Semiring_Times_Assoc.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
+fun assoc_fold ctxt ct = Semiring_Times_Assoc.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
 
 structure CancelNumeralFactorCommon =
 struct
@@ -440,11 +440,11 @@
   val neg_exchanges = true
 )
 
-fun eq_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = EqCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun less_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = LessCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun le_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = LeCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun div_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = DivCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun divide_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = DivideCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
+fun eq_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = EqCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun less_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = LessCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun le_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = LeCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun div_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = DivCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun divide_cancel_numeral_factor ctxt ct = DivideCancelNumeralFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
 
 val field_divide_cancel_numeral_factor =
   [prep_simproc @{theory}
@@ -577,19 +577,19 @@
   fun simp_conv _ _ = SOME @{thm mult_divide_mult_cancel_left_if}
 );
 
-fun eq_cancel_factor ctxt ct = EqCancelFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun le_cancel_factor ctxt ct = LeCancelFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun less_cancel_factor ctxt ct = LessCancelFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun div_cancel_factor ctxt ct = DivCancelFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun mod_cancel_factor ctxt ct = ModCancelFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun dvd_cancel_factor ctxt ct = DvdCancelFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
-fun divide_cancel_factor ctxt ct = DivideCancelFactor.proc ctxt (term_of ct)
+fun eq_cancel_factor ctxt ct = EqCancelFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun le_cancel_factor ctxt ct = LeCancelFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun less_cancel_factor ctxt ct = LessCancelFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun div_cancel_factor ctxt ct = DivCancelFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun mod_cancel_factor ctxt ct = ModCancelFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun dvd_cancel_factor ctxt ct = DvdCancelFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
+fun divide_cancel_factor ctxt ct = DivideCancelFactor.proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct)
 
 local
  val zr = @{cpat "0"}
- val zT = ctyp_of_term zr
+ val zT = Thm.ctyp_of_term zr
  val geq = @{cpat HOL.eq}
- val eqT = Thm.dest_ctyp (ctyp_of_term geq) |> hd
+ val eqT = Thm.dest_ctyp (Thm.ctyp_of_term geq) |> hd
  val add_frac_eq = mk_meta_eq @{thm "add_frac_eq"}
  val add_frac_num = mk_meta_eq @{thm "add_frac_num"}
  val add_num_frac = mk_meta_eq @{thm "add_num_frac"}
@@ -608,8 +608,8 @@
   let
     val ((x,y),(w,z)) =
          (Thm.dest_binop #> (fn (a,b) => (Thm.dest_binop a, Thm.dest_binop b))) ct
-    val _ = map (HOLogic.dest_number o term_of) [x,y,z,w]
-    val T = ctyp_of_term x
+    val _ = map (HOLogic.dest_number o Thm.term_of) [x,y,z,w]
+    val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term x
     val [y_nz, z_nz] = map (prove_nz ctxt T) [y, z]
     val th = instantiate' [SOME T] (map SOME [y,z,x,w]) add_frac_eq
   in SOME (Thm.implies_elim (Thm.implies_elim th y_nz) z_nz)
@@ -619,17 +619,17 @@
  fun proc2 phi ctxt ct =
   let
     val (l,r) = Thm.dest_binop ct
-    val T = ctyp_of_term l
-  in (case (term_of l, term_of r) of
+    val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term l
+  in (case (Thm.term_of l, Thm.term_of r) of
       (Const(@{const_name Fields.divide},_)$_$_, _) =>
         let val (x,y) = Thm.dest_binop l val z = r
-            val _ = map (HOLogic.dest_number o term_of) [x,y,z]
+            val _ = map (HOLogic.dest_number o Thm.term_of) [x,y,z]
             val ynz = prove_nz ctxt T y
         in SOME (Thm.implies_elim (instantiate' [SOME T] (map SOME [y,x,z]) add_frac_num) ynz)
         end
      | (_, Const (@{const_name Fields.divide},_)$_$_) =>
         let val (x,y) = Thm.dest_binop r val z = l
-            val _ = map (HOLogic.dest_number o term_of) [x,y,z]
+            val _ = map (HOLogic.dest_number o Thm.term_of) [x,y,z]
             val ynz = prove_nz ctxt T y
         in SOME (Thm.implies_elim (instantiate' [SOME T] (map SOME [y,z,x]) add_num_frac) ynz)
         end
@@ -640,50 +640,50 @@
  fun is_number (Const(@{const_name Fields.divide},_)$a$b) = is_number a andalso is_number b
    | is_number t = can HOLogic.dest_number t
 
- val is_number = is_number o term_of
+ val is_number = is_number o Thm.term_of
 
  fun proc3 phi ctxt ct =
-  (case term_of ct of
+  (case Thm.term_of ct of
     Const(@{const_name Orderings.less},_)$(Const(@{const_name Fields.divide},_)$_$_)$_ =>
       let
         val ((a,b),c) = Thm.dest_binop ct |>> Thm.dest_binop
         val _ = map is_number [a,b,c]
-        val T = ctyp_of_term c
+        val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term c
         val th = instantiate' [SOME T] (map SOME [a,b,c]) @{thm "divide_less_eq"}
       in SOME (mk_meta_eq th) end
   | Const(@{const_name Orderings.less_eq},_)$(Const(@{const_name Fields.divide},_)$_$_)$_ =>
       let
         val ((a,b),c) = Thm.dest_binop ct |>> Thm.dest_binop
         val _ = map is_number [a,b,c]
-        val T = ctyp_of_term c
+        val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term c
         val th = instantiate' [SOME T] (map SOME [a,b,c]) @{thm "divide_le_eq"}
       in SOME (mk_meta_eq th) end
   | Const(@{const_name HOL.eq},_)$(Const(@{const_name Fields.divide},_)$_$_)$_ =>
       let
         val ((a,b),c) = Thm.dest_binop ct |>> Thm.dest_binop
         val _ = map is_number [a,b,c]
-        val T = ctyp_of_term c
+        val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term c
         val th = instantiate' [SOME T] (map SOME [a,b,c]) @{thm "divide_eq_eq"}
       in SOME (mk_meta_eq th) end
   | Const(@{const_name Orderings.less},_)$_$(Const(@{const_name Fields.divide},_)$_$_) =>
     let
       val (a,(b,c)) = Thm.dest_binop ct ||> Thm.dest_binop
         val _ = map is_number [a,b,c]
-        val T = ctyp_of_term c
+        val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term c
         val th = instantiate' [SOME T] (map SOME [a,b,c]) @{thm "less_divide_eq"}
       in SOME (mk_meta_eq th) end
   | Const(@{const_name Orderings.less_eq},_)$_$(Const(@{const_name Fields.divide},_)$_$_) =>
     let
       val (a,(b,c)) = Thm.dest_binop ct ||> Thm.dest_binop
         val _ = map is_number [a,b,c]
-        val T = ctyp_of_term c
+        val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term c
         val th = instantiate' [SOME T] (map SOME [a,b,c]) @{thm "le_divide_eq"}
       in SOME (mk_meta_eq th) end
   | Const(@{const_name HOL.eq},_)$_$(Const(@{const_name Fields.divide},_)$_$_) =>
     let
       val (a,(b,c)) = Thm.dest_binop ct ||> Thm.dest_binop
         val _ = map is_number [a,b,c]
-        val T = ctyp_of_term c
+        val T = Thm.ctyp_of_term c
         val th = instantiate' [SOME T] (map SOME [a,b,c]) @{thm "eq_divide_eq"}
       in SOME (mk_meta_eq th) end
   | _ => NONE)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/record.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/record.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/record.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -77,8 +77,8 @@
   let
     fun match name ((name', _), _) = name = name';
     fun getvar name =
-      (case find_first (match name) (Term.add_vars (prop_of thm) []) of
-        SOME var => cterm_of (theory_of_thm thm) (Var var)
+      (case find_first (match name) (Term.add_vars (Thm.prop_of thm) []) of
+        SOME var => Thm.cterm_of (Thm.theory_of_thm thm) (Var var)
       | NONE => raise THM ("named_cterm_instantiate: " ^ name, 0, [thm]));
   in
     cterm_instantiate (map (apfst getvar) values) thm
@@ -97,7 +97,7 @@
   let
     val exists_thm =
       UNIV_I
-      |> Drule.instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of thy (Logic.varifyT_global rep_type))] [];
+      |> Drule.instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of thy (Logic.varifyT_global rep_type))] [];
     val proj_constr = Abs_inverse OF [exists_thm];
     val absT = Type (tyco, map TFree vs);
   in
@@ -141,8 +141,8 @@
     (*construct a type and body for the isomorphism constant by
       instantiating the theorem to which the definition will be applied*)
     val intro_inst =
-      rep_inject RS named_cterm_instantiate [("abst", cterm_of typ_thy absC)] iso_tuple_intro;
-    val (_, body) = Logic.dest_equals (List.last (prems_of intro_inst));
+      rep_inject RS named_cterm_instantiate [("abst", Thm.cterm_of typ_thy absC)] iso_tuple_intro;
+    val (_, body) = Logic.dest_equals (List.last (Thm.prems_of intro_inst));
     val isomT = fastype_of body;
     val isom_binding = Binding.suffix_name isoN b;
     val isom_name = Sign.full_name typ_thy isom_binding;
@@ -1121,7 +1121,7 @@
 
 fun get_upd_acc_cong_thm upd acc thy ss =
   let
-    val insts = [("upd", cterm_of thy upd), ("ac", cterm_of thy acc)];
+    val insts = [("upd", Thm.cterm_of thy upd), ("ac", Thm.cterm_of thy acc)];
     val prop = Thm.concl_of (named_cterm_instantiate insts updacc_cong_triv);
   in
     Goal.prove (Proof_Context.init_global thy) [] [] prop
@@ -1364,7 +1364,7 @@
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt;
 
-    val goal = term_of cgoal;
+    val goal = Thm.term_of cgoal;
     val frees = filter (is_recT o #2) (Term.add_frees goal []);
 
     val has_rec = exists_Const
@@ -1375,9 +1375,9 @@
 
     fun mk_split_free_tac free induct_thm i =
       let
-        val cfree = cterm_of thy free;
-        val _$ (_ $ r) = concl_of induct_thm;
-        val crec = cterm_of thy r;
+        val cfree = Thm.cterm_of thy free;
+        val _$ (_ $ r) = Thm.concl_of induct_thm;
+        val crec = Thm.cterm_of thy r;
         val thm = cterm_instantiate [(crec, cfree)] induct_thm;
       in
         simp_tac (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt addsimps @{thms induct_atomize}) i THEN
@@ -1415,7 +1415,7 @@
 (*Split all records in the goal, which are quantified by !! or ALL.*)
 fun split_tac ctxt = CSUBGOAL (fn (cgoal, i) =>
   let
-    val goal = term_of cgoal;
+    val goal = Thm.term_of cgoal;
 
     val has_rec = exists_Const
       (fn (s, Type (_, [Type (_, [T, _]), _])) =>
@@ -1466,12 +1466,12 @@
     val params = Logic.strip_params g;
     val concl = HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_assums_concl g);
     val rule' = Thm.lift_rule cgoal rule;
-    val (P, ys) = strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_assums_concl (prop_of rule')));
+    val (P, ys) = strip_comb (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_assums_concl (Thm.prop_of rule')));
     (*ca indicates if rule is a case analysis or induction rule*)
     val (x, ca) =
       (case rev (drop (length params) ys) of
         [] => (head_of (fst (HOLogic.dest_eq (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop
-          (hd (rev (Logic.strip_assums_hyp (hd (prems_of rule')))))))), true)
+          (hd (rev (Logic.strip_assums_hyp (hd (Thm.prems_of rule')))))))), true)
       | [x] => (head_of x, false));
     val rule'' =
       cterm_instantiate
@@ -1484,7 +1484,7 @@
           | (_, T) :: _ =>
               [(P, fold_rev Term.abs params (if ca then concl else incr_boundvars 1 (Abs (s, T, concl)))),
                 (x, fold_rev Term.abs params (Bound 0))])) rule';
-  in compose_tac ctxt (false, rule'', nprems_of rule) i end);
+  in compose_tac ctxt (false, rule'', Thm.nprems_of rule) i end);
 
 
 fun extension_definition name fields alphas zeta moreT more vars thy =
@@ -1608,7 +1608,7 @@
       (roughly) the definition of the accessor.*)
     val surject = timeit_msg ctxt "record extension surjective proof:" (fn () =>
       let
-        val cterm_ext = cterm_of defs_thy ext;
+        val cterm_ext = Thm.cterm_of defs_thy ext;
         val start = named_cterm_instantiate [("y", cterm_ext)] surject_assist_idE;
         val tactic1 =
           simp_tac (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss defs_ctxt addsimps [ext_def]) 1 THEN
@@ -1758,7 +1758,7 @@
       fun mk_eq_refl thy =
         @{thm equal_refl}
         |> Thm.instantiate
-          ([apply2 (ctyp_of thy) (TVar (("'a", 0), @{sort equal}), Logic.varifyT_global extT)], [])
+          ([apply2 (Thm.ctyp_of thy) (TVar (("'a", 0), @{sort equal}), Logic.varifyT_global extT)], [])
         |> Axclass.unoverload thy;
       val ensure_random_record = ensure_sort_record (@{sort random}, mk_random_eq);
       val ensure_exhaustive_record =
@@ -1945,8 +1945,8 @@
               fun to_Var (Free (c, T)) = Var ((c, 1), T);
             in mk_rec (map to_Var all_vars_more) 0 end;
 
-          val cterm_rec = cterm_of ext_thy r_rec0;
-          val cterm_vrs = cterm_of ext_thy r_rec0_Vars;
+          val cterm_rec = Thm.cterm_of ext_thy r_rec0;
+          val cterm_vrs = Thm.cterm_of ext_thy r_rec0_Vars;
           val insts = [("v", cterm_rec), ("v'", cterm_vrs)];
           val init_thm = named_cterm_instantiate insts updacc_eq_triv;
           val terminal = rtac updacc_eq_idI 1 THEN rtac refl 1;
@@ -2223,7 +2223,7 @@
         sel_convs' upd_convs' sel_defs' upd_defs' fold_congs' unfold_congs' splits' derived_defs'
         surjective' equality' induct_scheme' induct' cases_scheme' cases' simps' iffs';
 
-    val sels = map (fst o Logic.dest_equals o prop_of) sel_defs;
+    val sels = map (fst o Logic.dest_equals o Thm.prop_of) sel_defs;
 
     val final_thy =
       thms_thy'
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/reification.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/reification.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/reification.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -46,7 +46,7 @@
 
 fun mk_congeq ctxt fs th =
   let
-    val Const (fN, _) = th |> prop_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> HOLogic.dest_eq
+    val Const (fN, _) = th |> Thm.prop_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> HOLogic.dest_eq
       |> fst |> strip_comb |> fst;
     val cert = Proof_Context.cterm_of ctxt;
     val ((_, [th']), ctxt') = Variable.import true [th] ctxt;
@@ -95,7 +95,7 @@
 fun rearrange congs =
   let
     fun P (_, th) =
-      let val @{term "Trueprop"} $ (Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ l $ _) = concl_of th
+      let val @{term "Trueprop"} $ (Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ l $ _) = Thm.concl_of th
       in can dest_Var l end;
     val (yes, no) = List.partition P congs;
   in no @ yes end;
@@ -134,8 +134,8 @@
 fun decomp_reify da cgns (ct, ctxt) bds =
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt;
-    val cert = cterm_of thy;
-    val certT = ctyp_of thy;
+    val cert = Thm.cterm_of thy;
+    val certT = Thm.ctyp_of thy;
     fun tryabsdecomp (ct, ctxt) bds =
       (case Thm.term_of ct of
         Abs (_, xT, ta) =>
@@ -167,7 +167,7 @@
         (let
           val (tyenv, tmenv) =
             Pattern.match thy
-              ((fst o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop) (concl_of cong), Thm.term_of ct)
+              ((fst o HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop) (Thm.concl_of cong), Thm.term_of ct)
               (Vartab.empty, Vartab.empty);
           val (fnvs, invs) = List.partition (fn ((vn, _),_) => member (op =) vns vn) (Vartab.dest tmenv);
           val (fts, its) =
@@ -189,15 +189,15 @@
 fun tryeqs [] (ct, ctxt) bds = error "Cannot find the atoms equation"
   | tryeqs (eq :: eqs) (ct, ctxt) bds = ((
       let
-        val rhs = eq |> prop_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop  |> HOLogic.dest_eq |> snd;
+        val rhs = eq |> Thm.prop_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop  |> HOLogic.dest_eq |> snd;
         val nths = get_nths rhs [];
         val (vss, _) = fold_rev (fn (_, (vs, n)) => fn (vss, ns) =>
           (insert (op aconv) vs vss, insert (op aconv) n ns)) nths ([], []);
         val (vsns, ctxt') = Variable.variant_fixes (replicate (length vss) "vs") ctxt;
         val (xns, ctxt'') = Variable.variant_fixes (replicate (length nths) "x") ctxt';
         val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt'';
-        val cert = cterm_of thy;
-        val certT = ctyp_of thy;
+        val cert = Thm.cterm_of thy;
+        val certT = Thm.ctyp_of thy;
         val vsns_map = vss ~~ vsns;
         val xns_map = fst (split_list nths) ~~ xns;
         val subst = map (fn (nt, xn) => (nt, Var ((xn, 0), fastype_of nt))) xns_map;
@@ -243,7 +243,7 @@
     val tT = fastype_of (Thm.term_of ct);
     fun isat eq =
       let
-        val rhs = eq |> prop_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> HOLogic.dest_eq |> snd;
+        val rhs = eq |> Thm.prop_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop |> HOLogic.dest_eq |> snd;
       in exists_Const
         (fn (n, ty) => n = @{const_name "List.nth"}
           andalso AList.defined Type.could_unify bds (domain_type ty)) rhs
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@
 
 fun mk_congs ctxt eqs =
   let
-    val fs = fold_rev (fn eq => insert (op =) (eq |> prop_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop
+    val fs = fold_rev (fn eq => insert (op =) (eq |> Thm.prop_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop
       |> HOLogic.dest_eq |> fst |> strip_comb
       |> fst)) eqs [];
     val tys = fold_rev (fn f => fold (insert (op =)) (f |> fastype_of |> binder_types |> tl)) fs [];
@@ -266,7 +266,7 @@
       the o AList.lookup (op =) (map2 (fn T => fn v => (T, cert (Free (v, T)))) tys vs);
     fun prep_eq eq =
       let
-        val (_, _ :: vs) = eq |> prop_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop
+        val (_, _ :: vs) = eq |> Thm.prop_of |> HOLogic.dest_Trueprop
           |> HOLogic.dest_eq |> fst |> strip_comb;
         val subst = map_filter (fn (v as Var (_, T)) => SOME (cert v, subst T)
           | _ => NONE) vs;
@@ -283,7 +283,7 @@
       apfst mk_eq (divide_and_conquer' (decomp_reify (mk_decompatom eqs) congs) (ct, ctxt) bds);
     fun is_list_var (Var (_, t)) = can dest_listT t
       | is_list_var _ = false;
-    val vars = th |> prop_of |> Logic.dest_equals |> snd
+    val vars = th |> Thm.prop_of |> Logic.dest_equals |> snd
       |> strip_comb |> snd |> filter is_list_var;
     val cert = Proof_Context.cterm_of ctxt;
     val vs = map (fn v as Var (_, T) =>
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/sat.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/sat.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/sat.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
 val resolution_thm =
   @{lemma "(P ==> False) ==> (~ P ==> False) ==> False" by (rule case_split)}
 
-val cP = cterm_of @{theory} (Var (("P", 0), HOLogic.boolT));
+val cP = Thm.cterm_of @{theory} (Var (("P", 0), HOLogic.boolT));
 
 (* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
 (* lit_ord: an order on integers that considers their absolute values only,  *)
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@
             (* [c_1, ..., c_n] |- c_1 && ... && c_n *)
             val clauses_thm = Conjunction.intr_balanced (map Thm.assume sorted_clauses)
             (* [c_1 && ... && c_n] |- c_1 && ... && c_n *)
-            val cnf_cterm = cprop_of clauses_thm
+            val cnf_cterm = Thm.cprop_of clauses_thm
             val cnf_thm = Thm.assume cnf_cterm
             (* [[c_1 && ... && c_n] |- c_1, ..., [c_1 && ... && c_n] |- c_n] *)
             val cnf_clauses = Conjunction.elim_balanced (length sorted_clauses) cnf_thm
@@ -409,7 +409,7 @@
 
 fun rawsat_tac ctxt i =
   Subgoal.FOCUS (fn {context = ctxt', prems, ...} =>
-    resolve_tac ctxt' [rawsat_thm ctxt' (map cprop_of prems)] 1) ctxt i;
+    resolve_tac ctxt' [rawsat_thm ctxt' (map Thm.cprop_of prems)] 1) ctxt i;
 
 (* ------------------------------------------------------------------------- *)
 (* pre_cnf_tac: converts the i-th subgoal                                    *)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/semiring_normalizer.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/semiring_normalizer.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/semiring_normalizer.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -126,12 +126,12 @@
 val field_funs =
   let
     fun numeral_is_const ct =
-      case term_of ct of
+      case Thm.term_of ct of
        Const (@{const_name Fields.divide},_) $ a $ b =>
          can HOLogic.dest_number a andalso can HOLogic.dest_number b
      | Const (@{const_name Fields.inverse},_)$t => can HOLogic.dest_number t
      | t => can HOLogic.dest_number t
-    fun dest_const ct = ((case term_of ct of
+    fun dest_const ct = ((case Thm.term_of ct of
        Const (@{const_name Fields.divide},_) $ a $ b=>
         Rat.rat_of_quotient (snd (HOLogic.dest_number a), snd (HOLogic.dest_number b))
      | Const (@{const_name Fields.inverse},_)$t => 
@@ -231,7 +231,7 @@
 
 fun is_binop ct ct' =
   (case Thm.term_of ct' of
-    c $ _ $ _ => term_of ct aconv c
+    c $ _ $ _ => Thm.term_of ct aconv c
   | _ => false);
 
 fun dest_binop ct ct' =
@@ -240,7 +240,7 @@
 
 fun inst_thm inst = Thm.instantiate ([], inst);
 
-val dest_number = term_of #> HOLogic.dest_number #> snd;
+val dest_number = Thm.term_of #> HOLogic.dest_number #> snd;
 val is_number = can dest_number;
 
 fun numeral01_conv ctxt =
@@ -838,7 +838,7 @@
     addsimps (@{thms eval_nat_numeral} @ @{thms diff_nat_numeral} @ @{thms arith_simps} @ @{thms rel_simps})
     addsimps [@{thm Let_def}, @{thm if_False}, @{thm if_True}, @{thm Nat.add_0}, @{thm add_Suc}]);
 
-fun simple_cterm_ord t u = Term_Ord.term_ord (term_of t, term_of u) = LESS;
+fun simple_cterm_ord t u = Term_Ord.term_ord (Thm.term_of t, Thm.term_of u) = LESS;
 
 
 (* various normalizing conversions *)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/set_comprehension_pointfree.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/set_comprehension_pointfree.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/set_comprehension_pointfree.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -430,7 +430,7 @@
       in
         HOLogic.Collect_const T $ absdummy T (list_ex vs (HOLogic.mk_conj (eq, t'')))
       end;
-    fun is_eq th = is_some (try (HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop) (prop_of th))
+    fun is_eq th = is_some (try (HOLogic.dest_eq o HOLogic.dest_Trueprop) (Thm.prop_of th))
     val unfold_thms = @{thms split_paired_all mem_Collect_eq prod.case}
     fun tac ctxt = 
       resolve_tac ctxt @{thms set_eqI}
@@ -446,10 +446,10 @@
         simp_tac (put_simpset HOL_basic_ss ctxt addsimps (filter is_eq prems)) 1) ctxt
       THEN' TRY o assume_tac ctxt
   in
-    case try mk_term (term_of ct) of
+    case try mk_term (Thm.term_of ct) of
       NONE => Thm.reflexive ct
     | SOME t' =>
-      Goal.prove ctxt [] [] (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (HOLogic.mk_eq (term_of ct, t')))
+      Goal.prove ctxt [] [] (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (HOLogic.mk_eq (Thm.term_of ct, t')))
           (fn {context, ...} => tac context 1)
         RS @{thm eq_reflection}
   end
@@ -473,7 +473,7 @@
       Raw_Simplifier.rewrite_cterm (false, false, false) (K (K NONE))
         (empty_simpset ctxt' addsimps thms)
     val prep_eq = (comprehension_conv ctxt' then_conv unfold_conv prep_thms) ct
-    val t'' = term_of (Thm.rhs_of prep_eq)
+    val t'' = Thm.term_of (Thm.rhs_of prep_eq)
     fun mk_thm (fm, t''') = Goal.prove ctxt' [] []
       (HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (HOLogic.mk_eq (t'', t'''))) (fn {context, ...} => tac context fm 1)
     fun unfold th = th RS ((prep_eq RS meta_eq_to_obj_eq) RS @{thm trans})
@@ -487,7 +487,7 @@
 
 fun base_simproc ctxt redex =
   let
-    val set_compr = term_of redex
+    val set_compr = Thm.term_of redex
   in
     conv ctxt set_compr
     |> Option.map (fn thm => thm RS @{thm eq_reflection})
@@ -496,14 +496,14 @@
 fun instantiate_arg_cong ctxt pred =
   let
     val arg_cong = Thm.incr_indexes (maxidx_of_term pred + 1) @{thm arg_cong}
-    val f $ _ = fst (HOLogic.dest_eq (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (concl_of arg_cong)))
+    val f $ _ = fst (HOLogic.dest_eq (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.concl_of arg_cong)))
   in
     cterm_instantiate [(Proof_Context.cterm_of ctxt f, Proof_Context.cterm_of ctxt pred)] arg_cong
   end;
 
 fun simproc ctxt redex =
   let
-    val pred $ set_compr = term_of redex
+    val pred $ set_compr = Thm.term_of redex
     val arg_cong' = instantiate_arg_cong ctxt pred
   in
     conv ctxt set_compr
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/simpdata.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/simpdata.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/simpdata.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -41,12 +41,13 @@
 fun mk_meta_eq r = r RS @{thm eq_reflection};
 fun safe_mk_meta_eq r = mk_meta_eq r handle Thm.THM _ => r;
 
-fun mk_eq th = case concl_of th
+fun mk_eq th =
+  (case Thm.concl_of th of
   (*expects Trueprop if not == *)
-  of Const (@{const_name Pure.eq},_) $ _ $ _ => th
-   | _ $ (Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ _ $ _) => mk_meta_eq th
-   | _ $ (Const (@{const_name Not}, _) $ _) => th RS @{thm Eq_FalseI}
-   | _ => th RS @{thm Eq_TrueI}
+    Const (@{const_name Pure.eq},_) $ _ $ _ => th
+  | _ $ (Const (@{const_name HOL.eq}, _) $ _ $ _) => mk_meta_eq th
+  | _ $ (Const (@{const_name Not}, _) $ _) => th RS @{thm Eq_FalseI}
+  | _ => th RS @{thm Eq_TrueI})
 
 fun mk_eq_True (_: Proof.context) r =
   SOME (r RS @{thm meta_eq_to_obj_eq} RS @{thm Eq_TrueI}) handle Thm.THM _ => NONE;
@@ -87,7 +88,7 @@
       resolve_tac ctxt [lift_meta_eq_to_obj_eq i st] i st) rl)
   in
     mk_meta_eq rl' handle THM _ =>
-      if can Logic.dest_equals (concl_of rl') then rl'
+      if can Logic.dest_equals (Thm.concl_of rl') then rl'
       else error "Conclusion of congruence rules must be =-equality"
   end |> zero_var_indexes;
 
@@ -101,7 +102,7 @@
           if Thm.maxidx_of (Thm.adjust_maxidx_thm ~1 thm) = ~1 then res thm rls
           else Variable.trade (K (fn [thm'] => res thm' rls)) thm_ctxt [thm];
       in
-        case concl_of thm
+        case Thm.concl_of thm
           of Const (@{const_name Trueprop}, _) $ p => (case head_of p
             of Const (a, _) => (case AList.lookup (op =) pairs a
               of SOME rls => (maps atoms (res_fixed rls) handle THM _ => [thm])
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/split_rule.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/split_rule.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/split_rule.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -89,7 +89,7 @@
 
 (*curries ALL function variables occurring in a rule's conclusion*)
 fun split_rule ctxt rl =
-  fold_rev split_rule_var' (Misc_Legacy.term_vars (concl_of rl)) rl
+  fold_rev split_rule_var' (Misc_Legacy.term_vars (Thm.concl_of rl)) rl
   |> remove_internal_split ctxt
   |> Drule.export_without_context;
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Tools/try0.ML
--- a/src/HOL/Tools/try0.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Tools/try0.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -29,7 +29,7 @@
     (case (case timeout_opt of
             SOME timeout => TimeLimit.timeLimit timeout
           | NONE => fn f => fn x => f x) (Seq.pull o tac) (pre st) of
-      SOME (x, _) => nprems_of (post x) < nprems_of goal
+      SOME (x, _) => Thm.nprems_of (post x) < Thm.nprems_of goal
     | NONE => false)
   end;
 
@@ -68,7 +68,7 @@
     let val attrs = attrs_text attrs quad in
       apply_generic timeout_opt name
         ((name ^ attrs |> attrs <> "" ? enclose "(" ")") ^
-         (if all_goals andalso nprems_of (#goal (Proof.goal st)) > 1 then "[1]" else ""))
+         (if all_goals andalso Thm.nprems_of (#goal (Proof.goal st)) > 1 then "[1]" else ""))
         I (#goal o Proof.goal)
         (apply_named_method_on_first_goal (Proof.context_of st) (name ^ attrs)) st
     end
@@ -141,7 +141,7 @@
            | Try => "Try0 found a proof"
            | Normal => "Try this") ^ ": " ^
           Active.sendback_markup [Markup.padding_command]
-              ((if nprems_of (#goal (Proof.goal st)) = 1 then "by"
+              ((if Thm.nprems_of (#goal (Proof.goal st)) = 1 then "by"
                 else "apply") ^ " " ^ command) ^
           (case xs of
             [(_, ms)] => " (" ^ time_string ms ^ ")."
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Topological_Spaces.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Topological_Spaces.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Topological_Spaces.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -451,7 +451,7 @@
         (@{thm allI} RS @{thm always_eventually})
         |> fold (fn thm1 => fn thm2 => thm2 RS thm1) mp_thms
         |> fold (fn _ => fn thm => @{thm impI} RS thm) thms
-      val cases_prop = prop_of (raw_elim_thm RS st)
+      val cases_prop = Thm.prop_of (raw_elim_thm RS st)
       val cases = (Rule_Cases.make_common (thy, cases_prop) [(("elim", []), [])])
     in
       CASES cases (rtac raw_elim_thm 1)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/HOL/Word/WordBitwise.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Word/WordBitwise.thy	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Word/WordBitwise.thy	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -507,7 +507,7 @@
   @{cterm "[] :: nat list"} ns;
 
 fun upt_conv ctxt ct =
-  case term_of ct of
+  case Thm.term_of ct of
     (@{const upt} $ n $ m) =>
       let
         val (i, j) = apply2 (snd o HOLogic.dest_number) (n, m);
@@ -529,7 +529,7 @@
    proc = K upt_conv};
 
 fun word_len_simproc_fn ctxt ct =
-  case term_of ct of
+  case Thm.term_of ct of
     Const (@{const_name len_of}, _) $ t => (let
         val T = fastype_of t |> dest_Type |> snd |> the_single
         val n = Numeral.mk_cnumber @{ctyp nat} (Word_Lib.dest_binT T);
@@ -551,7 +551,7 @@
 fun nat_get_Suc_simproc_fn n_sucs ctxt ct =
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt;
-    val (f $ arg) = (term_of ct);
+    val (f $ arg) = Thm.term_of ct;
     val n = (case arg of @{term nat} $ n => n | n => n)
       |> HOLogic.dest_number |> snd;
     val (i, j) = if n > n_sucs then (n_sucs, n - n_sucs)
@@ -560,7 +560,7 @@
         (replicate i @{term Suc});
     val _ = if arg = arg' then raise TERM ("", []) else ();
     fun propfn g = HOLogic.mk_eq (g arg, g arg')
-      |> HOLogic.mk_Trueprop |> cterm_of thy;
+      |> HOLogic.mk_Trueprop |> Thm.cterm_of thy;
     val eq1 = Goal.prove_internal ctxt [] (propfn I)
       (K (simp_tac (put_simpset word_ss ctxt) 1));
   in Goal.prove_internal ctxt [] (propfn (curry (op $) f))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Provers/Arith/cancel_div_mod.ML
--- a/src/Provers/Arith/cancel_div_mod.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Provers/Arith/cancel_div_mod.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -72,7 +72,7 @@
 
 fun proc ctxt ct =
   let
-    val t = term_of ct;
+    val t = Thm.term_of ct;
     val (divs, mods) = coll_div_mod t ([], []);
   in
     if null divs orelse null mods then NONE
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Provers/Arith/fast_lin_arith.ML
--- a/src/Provers/Arith/fast_lin_arith.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Provers/Arith/fast_lin_arith.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -882,7 +882,7 @@
       | elim_neq (neqs as (neq :: _)) (asms', asm::asms) =
       (case get_first (fn th => SOME (asm COMP th) handle THM _ => NONE) [neq] of
         SOME spl =>
-          let val (ct1, ct2) = extract (cprop_of spl)
+          let val (ct1, ct2) = extract (Thm.cprop_of spl)
               val thm1 = Thm.assume ct1
               val thm2 = Thm.assume ct2
           in Spl (spl, ct1, elim_neq neqs (asms', asms@[thm1]),
@@ -905,7 +905,7 @@
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
     val nTconcl = LA_Logic.neg_prop Tconcl
-    val cnTconcl = cterm_of thy nTconcl
+    val cnTconcl = Thm.cterm_of thy nTconcl
     val nTconclthm = Thm.assume cnTconcl
     val tree = (if split_neq then splitasms ctxt else Tip) (thms @ [nTconclthm])
     val (Falsethm, _) = fwdproof ctxt tree js
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Provers/clasimp.ML
--- a/src/Provers/clasimp.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Provers/clasimp.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -65,7 +65,7 @@
 fun add_iff safe unsafe =
   Thm.declaration_attribute (fn th =>
     let
-      val n = nprems_of th;
+      val n = Thm.nprems_of th;
       val (elim, intro) = if n = 0 then safe else unsafe;
       val zero_rotate = zero_var_indexes o rotate_prems n;
     in
@@ -77,7 +77,7 @@
     end);
 
 fun del_iff del = Thm.declaration_attribute (fn th =>
-  let val zero_rotate = zero_var_indexes o rotate_prems (nprems_of th) in
+  let val zero_rotate = zero_var_indexes o rotate_prems (Thm.nprems_of th) in
     Thm.attribute_declaration del (zero_rotate (th RS Data.iffD2)) #>
     Thm.attribute_declaration del (Tactic.make_elim (zero_rotate (th RS Data.iffD1)))
     handle THM _ =>
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Provers/classical.ML
--- a/src/Provers/classical.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Provers/classical.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -351,7 +351,7 @@
     let
       val th' = classical_rule (flat_rule context th);
       val (safe0_rls, safep_rls) = (*0 subgoals vs 1 or more*)
-        List.partition (fn rl => nprems_of rl=1) [th'];
+        List.partition (fn rl => Thm.nprems_of rl=1) [th'];
       val nI = Item_Net.length safeIs;
       val nE = Item_Net.length safeEs + 1;
       val _ = warn_claset context th cs;
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@
   if Item_Net.member safeEs th then
     let
       val th' = classical_rule (flat_rule context th);
-      val (safe0_rls, safep_rls) = List.partition (fn rl => nprems_of rl = 1) [th'];
+      val (safe0_rls, safep_rls) = List.partition (fn rl => Thm.nprems_of rl = 1) [th'];
     in
       CS
        {safe0_netpair = delete ([], safe0_rls) safe0_netpair,
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Provers/hypsubst.ML
--- a/src/Provers/hypsubst.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Provers/hypsubst.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -184,14 +184,14 @@
             (case (if b then t else t') of
               Bound j => subst_bounds (map Bound ((1 upto j) @ 0 :: (j + 2 upto length ps)), Q)
             | t => Term.abstract_over (t, Term.incr_boundvars 1 Q));
-        val (instT, _) = Thm.match (apply2 (cterm_of thy o Logic.mk_type) (V, U));
+        val (instT, _) = Thm.match (apply2 (Thm.cterm_of thy o Logic.mk_type) (V, U));
       in
         compose_tac ctxt (true, Drule.instantiate_normalize (instT,
-          map (apply2 (cterm_of thy))
+          map (apply2 (Thm.cterm_of thy))
             [(Var (ixn, Ts ---> U --> body_type T), u),
              (Var (fst (dest_Var (head_of v1)), Ts ---> U), fold_rev Term.abs ps t),
              (Var (fst (dest_Var (head_of v2)), Ts ---> U), fold_rev Term.abs ps t')]) rl',
-          nprems_of rl) i
+          Thm.nprems_of rl) i
       end
   | NONE => no_tac);
 
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@
       | imptac (r, hyp::hyps) st =
           let
             val (hyp', _) =
-              term_of (Thm.cprem_of st i)
+              Thm.term_of (Thm.cprem_of st i)
               |> Logic.strip_assums_concl
               |> Data.dest_Trueprop |> Data.dest_imp;
             val (r', tac) =
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Provers/order.ML
--- a/src/Provers/order.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Provers/order.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -1235,7 +1235,9 @@
   let
    val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt;
    val rfrees = map Free (Term.rename_wrt_term A (Logic.strip_params A));
-   val Hs = map prop_of prems @ map (fn H => subst_bounds (rfrees, H)) (Logic.strip_assums_hyp A)
+   val Hs =
+    map Thm.prop_of prems @
+    map (fn H => subst_bounds (rfrees, H)) (Logic.strip_assums_hyp A)
    val C = subst_bounds (rfrees, Logic.strip_assums_concl A)
    val lesss = flat (map_index (mkasm decomp less_thms thy) Hs)
    val prfs = gen_solve mkconcl thy (lesss, C);
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Provers/quantifier1.ML
--- a/src/Provers/quantifier1.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Provers/quantifier1.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -181,7 +181,7 @@
   in quant xs (qC $ Abs (x, T, Q)) end;
 
 fun rearrange_all ctxt ct =
-  (case term_of ct of
+  (case Thm.term_of ct of
     F as (all as Const (q, _)) $ Abs (x, T, P) =>
       (case extract_quant extract_imp q P of
         NONE => NONE
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@
   | _ => NONE);
 
 fun rearrange_ball tac ctxt ct =
-  (case term_of ct of
+  (case Thm.term_of ct of
     F as Ball $ A $ Abs (x, T, P) =>
       (case extract_imp true [] P of
         NONE => NONE
@@ -203,7 +203,7 @@
   | _ => NONE);
 
 fun rearrange_ex ctxt ct =
-  (case term_of ct of
+  (case Thm.term_of ct of
     F as (ex as Const (q, _)) $ Abs (x, T, P) =>
       (case extract_quant extract_conj q P of
         NONE => NONE
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@
   | _ => NONE);
 
 fun rearrange_bex tac ctxt ct =
-  (case term_of ct of
+  (case Thm.term_of ct of
     F as Bex $ A $ Abs (x, T, P) =>
       (case extract_conj true [] P of
         NONE => NONE
@@ -223,7 +223,7 @@
   | _ => NONE);
 
 fun rearrange_Collect tac ctxt ct =
-  (case term_of ct of
+  (case Thm.term_of ct of
     F as Collect $ Abs (x, T, P) =>
       (case extract_conj true [] P of
         NONE => NONE
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Provers/splitter.ML
--- a/src/Provers/splitter.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Provers/splitter.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -55,17 +55,19 @@
 
 fun split_format_err () = error "Wrong format for split rule";
 
-fun split_thm_info thm = case concl_of (Data.mk_eq thm) of
-     Const(@{const_name Pure.eq}, _) $ (Var _ $ t) $ c => (case strip_comb t of
-       (Const p, _) => (p, case c of (Const (s, _) $ _) => s = const_not | _ => false)
-     | _ => split_format_err ())
-   | _ => split_format_err ();
+fun split_thm_info thm =
+  (case Thm.concl_of (Data.mk_eq thm) of
+    Const(@{const_name Pure.eq}, _) $ (Var _ $ t) $ c =>
+      (case strip_comb t of
+        (Const p, _) => (p, case c of (Const (s, _) $ _) => s = const_not | _ => false)
+      | _ => split_format_err ())
+  | _ => split_format_err ());
 
 fun cmap_of_split_thms thms =
 let
   val splits = map Data.mk_eq thms
   fun add_thm thm cmap =
-    (case concl_of thm of _ $ (t as _ $ lhs) $ _ =>
+    (case Thm.concl_of thm of _ $ (t as _ $ lhs) $ _ =>
        (case strip_comb lhs of (Const(a,aT),args) =>
           let val info = (aT,lhs,thm,fastype_of t,length args)
           in case AList.lookup (op =) cmap a of
@@ -102,7 +104,7 @@
   (fn {context = ctxt, prems} =>
     rewrite_goals_tac ctxt prems THEN resolve_tac ctxt [reflexive_thm] 1)
 
-val _ $ _ $ (_ $ (_ $ abs_lift) $ _) = prop_of lift;
+val _ $ _ $ (_ $ (_ $ abs_lift) $ _) = Thm.prop_of lift;
 
 val trlift = lift RS transitive_thm;
 
@@ -286,7 +288,7 @@
 fun select cmap state i =
   let
     val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm state
-    val goal = term_of (Thm.cprem_of state i);
+    val goal = Thm.term_of (Thm.cprem_of state i);
     val Ts = rev (map #2 (Logic.strip_params goal));
     val _ $ t $ _ = Logic.strip_assums_concl goal;
   in (Ts, t, sort shorter (split_posns cmap thy Ts t)) end;
@@ -313,7 +315,7 @@
 
 fun inst_lift Ts t (T, U, pos) state i =
   let
-    val cert = cterm_of (Thm.theory_of_thm state);
+    val cert = Thm.cterm_of (Thm.theory_of_thm state);
     val (cntxt, u) = mk_cntxt t pos (T --> U);
     val trlift' = Thm.lift_rule (Thm.cprem_of state i)
       (Thm.rename_boundvars abs_lift u trlift);
@@ -341,7 +343,7 @@
     val thm' = Thm.lift_rule (Thm.cprem_of state i) thm;
     val (P, _) = strip_comb (fst (Logic.dest_equals
       (Logic.strip_assums_concl (Thm.prop_of thm'))));
-    val cert = cterm_of (Thm.theory_of_thm state);
+    val cert = Thm.cterm_of (Thm.theory_of_thm state);
     val cntxt = mk_cntxt_splitthm t tt TB;
   in cterm_instantiate [(cert P, cert (abss Ts cntxt))] thm'
   end;
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Provers/trancl.ML
--- a/src/Provers/trancl.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Provers/trancl.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -93,8 +93,8 @@
 fun prove thy r asms =
   let
     fun inst thm =
-      let val SOME (_, _, r', _) = decomp (concl_of thm)
-      in Drule.cterm_instantiate [(cterm_of thy r', cterm_of thy r)] thm end;
+      let val SOME (_, _, r', _) = decomp (Thm.concl_of thm)
+      in Drule.cterm_instantiate [(Thm.cterm_of thy r', Thm.cterm_of thy r)] thm end;
     fun pr (Asm i) = nth asms i
       | pr (Thm (prfs, thm)) = map pr prfs MRS inst thm;
   in pr end;
@@ -543,7 +543,7 @@
  in
   Subgoal.FOCUS (fn {context = ctxt', prems, concl, ...} =>
     let
-      val SOME (_, _, rel', _) = decomp (term_of concl);
+      val SOME (_, _, rel', _) = decomp (Thm.term_of concl);
       val thms = map (prove thy rel' prems) prfs
     in resolve_tac ctxt' [prove thy rel' thms prf] 1 end) ctxt n st
  end
@@ -562,7 +562,7 @@
  in
   Subgoal.FOCUS (fn {context = ctxt', prems, concl, ...} =>
     let
-      val SOME (_, _, rel', _) = decomp (term_of concl);
+      val SOME (_, _, rel', _) = decomp (Thm.term_of concl);
       val thms = map (prove thy rel' prems) prfs
     in resolve_tac ctxt' [prove thy rel' thms prf] 1 end) ctxt n st
  end
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/Isar/expression.ML
--- a/src/Pure/Isar/expression.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/Isar/expression.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -706,7 +706,7 @@
 fun define_preds binding parms (((exts, exts'), (ints, ints')), defs) thy =
   let
     val ctxt = Proof_Context.init_global thy;
-    val defs' = map (cterm_of thy #> Assumption.assume ctxt #> Drule.abs_def) defs;
+    val defs' = map (Thm.cterm_of thy #> Assumption.assume ctxt #> Drule.abs_def) defs;
 
     val (a_pred, a_intro, a_axioms, thy'') =
       if null exts then (NONE, NONE, [], thy)
@@ -807,7 +807,7 @@
     val notes =
       if is_some asm then
         [("", [((Binding.conceal (Binding.suffix_name ("_" ^ axiomsN) binding), []),
-          [([Assumption.assume pred_ctxt (cterm_of thy' (the asm))],
+          [([Assumption.assume pred_ctxt (Thm.cterm_of thy' (the asm))],
             [(Attrib.internal o K) Locale.witness_add])])])]
       else [];
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/Isar/proof.ML
--- a/src/Pure/Isar/proof.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/Isar/proof.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -474,7 +474,8 @@
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt;
 
     val _ =
-      Theory.subthy (theory_of_thm goal, thy) orelse error "Bad background theory of goal state";
+      Theory.subthy (Thm.theory_of_thm goal, thy) orelse
+        error "Bad background theory of goal state";
     val _ = Thm.no_prems goal orelse error (Proof_Display.string_of_goal ctxt goal);
 
     fun lost_structure () = error ("Lost goal structure:\n" ^ Display.string_of_thm ctxt goal);
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/Isar/rule_cases.ML
--- a/src/Pure/Isar/rule_cases.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/Isar/rule_cases.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@
 
 fun (tac1 THEN_ALL_NEW_CASES tac2) i st =
   st |> tac1 i |> Seq.maps (fn (cases, st') =>
-    CASES cases (Seq.INTERVAL tac2 i (i + nprems_of st' - nprems_of st)) st');
+    CASES cases (Seq.INTERVAL tac2 i (i + Thm.nprems_of st' - Thm.nprems_of st)) st');
 
 
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/Isar/runtime.ML
--- a/src/Pure/Isar/runtime.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/Isar/runtime.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -112,7 +112,7 @@
                 raised exn "TERM" (msg :: robust_context context Syntax.string_of_term ts)
             | CTERM (msg, cts) =>
                 raised exn "CTERM"
-                  (msg :: robust_context context Syntax.string_of_term (map term_of cts))
+                  (msg :: robust_context context Syntax.string_of_term (map Thm.term_of cts))
             | THM (msg, i, thms) =>
                 raised exn ("THM " ^ string_of_int i)
                   (msg :: robust_context context Display.string_of_thm thms)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/Proof/extraction.ML
--- a/src/Pure/Proof/extraction.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/Proof/extraction.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -319,8 +319,8 @@
     let
       val name = Thm.derivation_name thm;
       val _ = name <> "" orelse error "add_realizers: unnamed theorem";
-      val prop = Thm.unconstrainT thm |> prop_of |>
-        Pattern.rewrite_term thy' (map (Logic.dest_equals o prop_of) defs) [];
+      val prop = Thm.unconstrainT thm |> Thm.prop_of |>
+        Pattern.rewrite_term thy' (map (Logic.dest_equals o Thm.prop_of) defs) [];
       val vars = vars_of prop;
       val vars' = filter_out (fn v =>
         member (op =) rtypes (tname_of (body_type (fastype_of v)))) vars;
@@ -354,7 +354,7 @@
     val procs = maps (rev o fst o snd) types;
     val eqns = Net.merge (K false) (#net realizes_eqns, #net typeof_eqns);
     val prop' = Pattern.rewrite_term thy'
-      (map (Logic.dest_equals o prop_of) defs) [] prop;
+      (map (Logic.dest_equals o Thm.prop_of) defs) [] prop;
   in freeze_thaw (condrew thy' eqns
     (procs @ [typeof_proc [] vs, rlz_proc]))
       (Const ("realizes", fastype_of t --> propT --> propT) $ t $ prop')
@@ -364,8 +364,8 @@
   let
     val S = Sign.defaultS thy;
     val ((atyp_map, constraints, _), prop') =
-      Logic.unconstrainT (#shyps (rep_thm thm)) (prop_of thm);
-    val atyps = fold_types (fold_atyps (insert (op =))) (prop_of thm) [];
+      Logic.unconstrainT (#shyps (Thm.rep_thm thm)) (Thm.prop_of thm);
+    val atyps = fold_types (fold_atyps (insert (op =))) (Thm.prop_of thm) [];
     val Ts = map_filter (fn ((v, i), _) => if member (op =) vs v then
         SOME (TVar (("'" ^ v, i), [])) else NONE)
       (rev (Term.add_vars prop' []));
@@ -397,7 +397,7 @@
       (if is_def then
         {realizes_eqns = realizes_eqns,
          typeof_eqns = add_rule ([], Logic.dest_equals (map_types
-           Type.strip_sorts (prop_of (Drule.abs_def thm)))) typeof_eqns,
+           Type.strip_sorts (Thm.prop_of (Drule.abs_def thm)))) typeof_eqns,
          types = types,
          realizers = realizers, defs = insert Thm.eq_thm thm defs,
          expand = expand, prep = prep}
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/Proof/proof_checker.ML
--- a/src/Pure/Proof/proof_checker.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/Proof/proof_checker.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -38,7 +38,7 @@
 
 fun pretty_prf thy vs Hs prf =
   let val prf' = prf |> Proofterm.prf_subst_bounds (map Free vs) |>
-    Proofterm.prf_subst_pbounds (map (Hyp o prop_of) Hs)
+    Proofterm.prf_subst_pbounds (map (Hyp o Thm.prop_of) Hs)
   in
     (Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof (Syntax.init_pretty_global thy) prf',
      Syntax.pretty_term_global thy (Reconstruct.prop_of prf'))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/Proof/proof_rewrite_rules.ML
--- a/src/Pure/Proof/proof_rewrite_rules.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/Proof/proof_rewrite_rules.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -253,7 +253,7 @@
 fun elim_defs thy r defs prf =
   let
     val defs' = map (Logic.dest_equals o
-      map_types Type.strip_sorts o prop_of o Drule.abs_def) defs;
+      map_types Type.strip_sorts o Thm.prop_of o Drule.abs_def) defs;
     val defnames = map Thm.derivation_name defs;
     val f = if not r then I else
       let
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/Proof/proof_syntax.ML
--- a/src/Pure/Proof/proof_syntax.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/Proof/proof_syntax.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -197,7 +197,7 @@
       |> add_proof_atom_consts
         (map (Long_Name.append "axm") axm_names @ map (Long_Name.append "thm") thm_names);
   in
-    (cterm_of thy' (term_of_proof prf), proof_of_term thy true o Thm.term_of)
+    (Thm.cterm_of thy' (term_of_proof prf), proof_of_term thy true o Thm.term_of)
   end;
 
 fun read_term thy topsort =
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/Tools/rule_insts.ML
--- a/src/Pure/Tools/rule_insts.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/Tools/rule_insts.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -213,7 +213,7 @@
     (* Tactic *)
     fun tac i st = CSUBGOAL (fn (cgoal, _) =>
       let
-        val goal = term_of cgoal;
+        val goal = Thm.term_of cgoal;
         val params = Logic.strip_params goal;  (*params of subgoal i as string typ pairs*)
         val params = rev (Term.rename_wrt_term goal params)
           (*as they are printed: bound variables with*)
@@ -265,12 +265,12 @@
         fun liftterm t =
           fold_rev absfree (param_names ~~ paramTs) (Logic.incr_indexes (paramTs, inc) t);
         fun liftpair (cv, ct) = (cterm_fun liftvar cv, cterm_fun liftterm ct);
-        val lifttvar = apply2 (ctyp_of thy o Logic.incr_tvar inc);
+        val lifttvar = apply2 (Thm.ctyp_of thy o Logic.incr_tvar inc);
         val rule = Drule.instantiate_normalize
               (map lifttvar envT', map liftpair cenv)
               (Thm.lift_rule cgoal thm)
       in
-        compose_tac ctxt' (bires_flag, rule, nprems_of thm) i
+        compose_tac ctxt' (bires_flag, rule, Thm.nprems_of thm) i
       end) i st;
   in tac end;
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/axclass.ML
--- a/src/Pure/axclass.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/axclass.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -191,7 +191,7 @@
               thy2
               |> update_classrel ((c1, c2),
                 (the_classrel thy2 (c1, c) RS the_classrel thy2 (c, c2))
-                |> Drule.instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of thy2 (TVar ((Name.aT, 0), [])))] []
+                |> Drule.instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of thy2 (TVar ((Name.aT, 0), [])))] []
                 |> Thm.close_derivation));
 
         val proven = is_classrel thy1;
@@ -228,7 +228,7 @@
             c1 = c2 andalso Sorts.sorts_le algebra (Ss2, Ss)) ars);
 
     val names = Name.invent Name.context Name.aT (length Ss);
-    val std_vars = map (fn a => SOME (ctyp_of thy (TVar ((a, 0), [])))) names;
+    val std_vars = map (fn a => SOME (Thm.ctyp_of thy (TVar ((a, 0), [])))) names;
 
     val completions = super_class_completions |> map (fn c1 =>
       let
@@ -396,7 +396,7 @@
     val (th', thy') = Global_Theory.store_thm (binding, th) thy;
     val th'' = th'
       |> Thm.unconstrainT
-      |> Drule.instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of thy' (TVar ((Name.aT, 0), [])))] [];
+      |> Drule.instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of thy' (TVar ((Name.aT, 0), [])))] [];
   in
     thy'
     |> Sign.primitive_classrel (c1, c2)
@@ -418,7 +418,7 @@
 
     val args = Name.invent_names Name.context Name.aT Ss;
     val T = Type (t, map TFree args);
-    val std_vars = map (fn (a, S) => SOME (ctyp_of thy' (TVar ((a, 0), [])))) args;
+    val std_vars = map (fn (a, S) => SOME (Thm.ctyp_of thy' (TVar ((a, 0), [])))) args;
 
     val missing_params = Sign.complete_sort thy' [c]
       |> maps (these o Option.map #params o try (get_info thy'))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/drule.ML
--- a/src/Pure/drule.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/drule.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -130,7 +130,7 @@
   | _ => ct);
 
 (*The premises of a theorem, as a cterm list*)
-val cprems_of = strip_imp_prems o cprop_of;
+val cprems_of = strip_imp_prems o Thm.cprop_of;
 
 fun cterm_fun f ct = Thm.cterm_of (Thm.theory_of_cterm ct) (f (Thm.term_of ct));
 fun ctyp_fun f cT = Thm.ctyp_of (Thm.theory_of_ctyp cT) (f (Thm.typ_of cT));
@@ -168,7 +168,7 @@
 (*Beta-conversion for cterms, where x is an abstraction. Simply returns the rhs
   of the meta-equality returned by the beta_conversion rule.*)
 fun beta_conv x y =
-  Thm.dest_arg (cprop_of (Thm.beta_conversion false (Thm.apply x y)));
+  Thm.dest_arg (Thm.cprop_of (Thm.beta_conversion false (Thm.apply x y)));
 
 
 
@@ -406,8 +406,8 @@
 
 fun extensional eq =
   let val eq' =
-    Thm.abstract_rule "x" (Thm.dest_arg (fst (Thm.dest_equals (cprop_of eq)))) eq
-  in Thm.equal_elim (Thm.eta_conversion (cprop_of eq')) eq' end;
+    Thm.abstract_rule "x" (Thm.dest_arg (fst (Thm.dest_equals (Thm.cprop_of eq)))) eq
+  in Thm.equal_elim (Thm.eta_conversion (Thm.cprop_of eq')) eq' end;
 
 val equals_cong =
   store_standard_thm_open (Binding.make ("equals_cong", @{here}))
@@ -452,7 +452,7 @@
 fun binop_cong_rule ct th1 th2 = Thm.combination (arg_cong_rule ct th1) th2;
 
 local
-  val dest_eq = Thm.dest_equals o cprop_of
+  val dest_eq = Thm.dest_equals o Thm.cprop_of
   val rhs_of = snd o dest_eq
 in
 fun beta_eta_conversion t =
@@ -467,7 +467,7 @@
 
 (*Contract all eta-redexes in the theorem, lest they give rise to needless abstractions*)
 fun eta_contraction_rule th =
-  Thm.equal_elim (Thm.eta_conversion (cprop_of th)) th;
+  Thm.equal_elim (Thm.eta_conversion (Thm.cprop_of th)) th;
 
 
 (* abs_def *)
@@ -482,7 +482,7 @@
 
 fun contract_lhs th =
   Thm.transitive (Thm.symmetric (beta_eta_conversion
-    (fst (Thm.dest_equals (cprop_of th))))) th;
+    (fst (Thm.dest_equals (Thm.cprop_of th))))) th;
 
 fun var_args ct =
   (case try Thm.dest_comb ct of
@@ -793,7 +793,7 @@
   | cterm_instantiate ctpairs th =
       let
         val (thy, tye, _) = fold_rev add_types ctpairs (Thm.theory_of_thm th, Vartab.empty, 0);
-        val certT = ctyp_of thy;
+        val certT = Thm.ctyp_of thy;
         val instT =
           Vartab.fold (fn (xi, (S, T)) =>
             cons (certT (TVar (xi, S)), certT (Envir.norm_type tye T))) tye [];
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/goal.ML
--- a/src/Pure/goal.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/goal.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -214,7 +214,8 @@
       | SOME st =>
           let
             val _ =
-              Theory.subthy (theory_of_thm st, thy) orelse err "Bad background theory of goal state";
+              Theory.subthy (Thm.theory_of_thm st, thy) orelse
+                err "Bad background theory of goal state";
             val res =
               (finish ctxt' st
                 |> Drule.flexflex_unique (SOME ctxt')
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/more_thm.ML
--- a/src/Pure/more_thm.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/more_thm.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -273,8 +273,8 @@
 );
 
 fun declare_hyps ct ctxt =
-  if Theory.subthy (theory_of_cterm ct, Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt) then
-    (Hyps.map o apfst) (Termtab.update (term_of ct, ())) ctxt
+  if Theory.subthy (Thm.theory_of_cterm ct, Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt) then
+    (Hyps.map o apfst) (Termtab.update (Thm.term_of ct, ())) ctxt
   else raise CTERM ("assume_hyps: bad background theory", [ct]);
 
 fun assume_hyps ct ctxt = (Thm.assume ct, declare_hyps ct ctxt);
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/raw_simplifier.ML
--- a/src/Pure/raw_simplifier.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/raw_simplifier.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -182,11 +182,11 @@
   end;
 
 fun rrule_extra_vars elhs thm =
-  rewrite_rule_extra_vars [] (term_of elhs) (Thm.full_prop_of thm);
+  rewrite_rule_extra_vars [] (Thm.term_of elhs) (Thm.full_prop_of thm);
 
 fun mk_rrule2 {thm, name, lhs, elhs, perm} =
   let
-    val t = term_of elhs;
+    val t = Thm.term_of elhs;
     val fo = Pattern.first_order t orelse not (Pattern.pattern t);
     val extra = rrule_extra_vars elhs thm;
   in {thm = thm, name = name, lhs = lhs, elhs = elhs, extra = extra, fo = fo, perm = perm} end;
@@ -461,7 +461,7 @@
 
 fun del_rrule (rrule as {thm, elhs, ...}) ctxt =
   ctxt |> map_simpset1 (fn (rules, prems, depth) =>
-    (Net.delete_term eq_rrule (term_of elhs, rrule) rules, prems, depth))
+    (Net.delete_term eq_rrule (Thm.term_of elhs, rrule) rules, prems, depth))
   handle Net.DELETE =>
     (cond_warning ctxt (fn () => print_thm ctxt "Rewrite rule not in simpset:" ("", thm)); ctxt);
 
@@ -470,7 +470,7 @@
   ctxt |> map_simpset1 (fn (rules, prems, depth) =>
     let
       val rrule2 as {elhs, ...} = mk_rrule2 rrule;
-      val rules' = Net.insert_term eq_rrule (term_of elhs, rrule2) rules;
+      val rules' = Net.insert_term eq_rrule (Thm.term_of elhs, rrule2) rules;
     in (rules', prems, depth) end)
   handle Net.INSERT =>
     (cond_warning ctxt (fn () => print_thm ctxt "Ignoring duplicate rewrite rule:" ("", thm));
@@ -496,12 +496,12 @@
     val (lhs, rhs) = Thm.dest_equals concl handle TERM _ =>
       raise SIMPLIFIER ("Rewrite rule not a meta-equality", [thm]);
     val elhs = Thm.dest_arg (Thm.cprop_of (Thm.eta_conversion lhs));
-    val erhs = Envir.eta_contract (term_of rhs);
+    val erhs = Envir.eta_contract (Thm.term_of rhs);
     val perm =
-      var_perm (term_of elhs, erhs) andalso
-      not (term_of elhs aconv erhs) andalso
-      not (is_Var (term_of elhs));
-  in (prems, term_of lhs, elhs, term_of rhs, perm) end;
+      var_perm (Thm.term_of elhs, erhs) andalso
+      not (Thm.term_of elhs aconv erhs) andalso
+      not (is_Var (Thm.term_of elhs));
+  in (prems, Thm.term_of lhs, elhs, Thm.term_of rhs, perm) end;
 
 end;
 
@@ -534,7 +534,7 @@
     if perm then [{thm = thm, name = name, lhs = lhs, elhs = elhs, perm = true}]
     else
       (*weak test for loops*)
-      if rewrite_rule_extra_vars prems lhs rhs orelse is_Var (term_of elhs)
+      if rewrite_rule_extra_vars prems lhs rhs orelse is_Var (Thm.term_of elhs)
       then mk_eq_True ctxt (thm, name)
       else rrule_eq_True ctxt thm name lhs elhs rhs thm
   end;
@@ -681,7 +681,7 @@
 
 fun mk_simproc name lhss proc =
   make_simproc {name = name, lhss = lhss, proc = fn _ => fn ctxt => fn ct =>
-    proc ctxt (term_of ct), identifier = []};
+    proc ctxt (Thm.term_of ct), identifier = []};
 
 (* FIXME avoid global thy and Logic.varify_global *)
 fun simproc_global_i thy name = mk_simproc name o map (Thm.cterm_of thy o Logic.varify_global);
@@ -692,10 +692,10 @@
 
 fun add_proc (proc as Proc {name, lhs, ...}) ctxt =
  (cond_tracing ctxt (fn () =>
-    print_term ctxt ("Adding simplification procedure " ^ quote name ^ " for") (term_of lhs));
+    print_term ctxt ("Adding simplification procedure " ^ quote name ^ " for") (Thm.term_of lhs));
   ctxt |> map_simpset2
     (fn (congs, procs, mk_rews, termless, subgoal_tac, loop_tacs, solvers) =>
-      (congs, Net.insert_term eq_proc (term_of lhs, proc) procs,
+      (congs, Net.insert_term eq_proc (Thm.term_of lhs, proc) procs,
         mk_rews, termless, subgoal_tac, loop_tacs, solvers))
   handle Net.INSERT =>
     (cond_warning ctxt (fn () => "Ignoring duplicate simplification procedure " ^ quote name);
@@ -704,7 +704,7 @@
 fun del_proc (proc as Proc {name, lhs, ...}) ctxt =
   ctxt |> map_simpset2
     (fn (congs, procs, mk_rews, termless, subgoal_tac, loop_tacs, solvers) =>
-      (congs, Net.delete_term eq_proc (term_of lhs, proc) procs,
+      (congs, Net.delete_term eq_proc (Thm.term_of lhs, proc) procs,
         mk_rews, termless, subgoal_tac, loop_tacs, solvers))
   handle Net.DELETE =>
     (cond_warning ctxt (fn () => "Simplification procedure " ^ quote name ^ " not in simpset");
@@ -917,7 +917,7 @@
     val Simpset ({rules, ...}, {congs, procs, termless, ...}) = simpset_of ctxt;
     val eta_thm = Thm.eta_conversion t;
     val eta_t' = Thm.rhs_of eta_thm;
-    val eta_t = term_of eta_t';
+    val eta_t = Thm.term_of eta_t';
     fun rew rrule =
       let
         val {thm, name, lhs, elhs, extra, fo, perm} = rrule
@@ -989,7 +989,7 @@
 
     fun proc_rews [] = NONE
       | proc_rews (Proc {name, proc, lhs, ...} :: ps) =
-          if Pattern.matches (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt) (term_of lhs, term_of t) then
+          if Pattern.matches (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt) (Thm.term_of lhs, Thm.term_of t) then
             (cond_tracing' ctxt simp_debug (fn () =>
               print_term ctxt ("Trying procedure " ^ quote name ^ " on:") eta_t);
              (case proc ctxt eta_t' of
@@ -1021,11 +1021,12 @@
 fun congc prover ctxt maxt cong t =
   let
     val rthm = Thm.incr_indexes (maxt + 1) cong;
-    val rlhs = fst (Thm.dest_equals (Drule.strip_imp_concl (cprop_of rthm)));
+    val rlhs = fst (Thm.dest_equals (Drule.strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of rthm)));
     val insts = Thm.match (rlhs, t)
     (* Thm.match can raise Pattern.MATCH;
        is handled when congc is called *)
-    val thm' = Thm.instantiate insts (Thm.rename_boundvars (term_of rlhs) (term_of t) rthm);
+    val thm' =
+      Thm.instantiate insts (Thm.rename_boundvars (Thm.term_of rlhs) (Thm.term_of t) rthm);
     val _ =
       cond_tracing ctxt (fn () => print_thm ctxt "Applying congruence rule:" ("", thm'));
     fun err (msg, thm) = (cond_tracing ctxt (fn () => print_thm ctxt msg ("", thm)); NONE);
@@ -1036,7 +1037,7 @@
         (case check_conv ctxt true (Drule.beta_eta_conversion t) thm2 of
           NONE => err ("Congruence proof failed.  Should not have proved", thm2)
         | SOME thm2' =>
-            if op aconv (apply2 term_of (Thm.dest_equals (cprop_of thm2')))
+            if op aconv (apply2 Thm.term_of (Thm.dest_equals (Thm.cprop_of thm2')))
             then NONE else SOME thm2'))
   end;
 
@@ -1076,13 +1077,13 @@
 
     and subc skel ctxt t0 =
         let val Simpset (_, {congs, ...}) = simpset_of ctxt in
-          (case term_of t0 of
+          (case Thm.term_of t0 of
               Abs (a, T, _) =>
                 let
                     val (v, ctxt') = Variable.next_bound (a, T) ctxt;
                     val b = #1 (Term.dest_Free v);
                     val (v', t') = Thm.dest_abs (SOME b) t0;
-                    val b' = #1 (Term.dest_Free (term_of v'));
+                    val b' = #1 (Term.dest_Free (Thm.term_of v'));
                     val _ =
                       if b <> b' then
                         warning ("Bad Simplifier context: renamed bound variable " ^
@@ -1155,11 +1156,11 @@
       else nonmut_impc ct ctxt
 
     and rules_of_prem prem ctxt =
-      if maxidx_of_term (term_of prem) <> ~1
+      if maxidx_of_term (Thm.term_of prem) <> ~1
       then
        (cond_tracing ctxt (fn () =>
           print_term ctxt "Cannot add premise as rewrite rule because it contains (type) unknowns:"
-            (term_of prem));
+            (Thm.term_of prem));
         (([], NONE), ctxt))
       else
         let val (asm, ctxt') = Thm.assume_hyps prem ctxt
@@ -1233,7 +1234,7 @@
         | SOME eqn =>
             let
               val prem' = Thm.rhs_of eqn;
-              val tprems = map term_of prems;
+              val tprems = map Thm.term_of prems;
               val i = 1 + fold Integer.max (map (fn p =>
                 find_index (fn q => q aconv p) tprems) (Thm.hyps_of eqn)) ~1;
               val ((rrs', asm'), ctxt') = rules_of_prem prem' ctxt;
@@ -1294,18 +1295,18 @@
     val ct = Thm.adjust_maxidx_cterm ~1 raw_ct;
     val {maxidx, ...} = Thm.rep_cterm ct;
     val _ =
-      Theory.subthy (theory_of_cterm ct, thy) orelse
+      Theory.subthy (Thm.theory_of_cterm ct, thy) orelse
         raise CTERM ("rewrite_cterm: bad background theory", [ct]);
 
     val ctxt =
       raw_ctxt
       |> Context_Position.set_visible false
       |> inc_simp_depth
-      |> (fn ctxt => trace_invoke {depth = simp_depth ctxt, term = term_of ct} ctxt);
+      |> (fn ctxt => trace_invoke {depth = simp_depth ctxt, term = Thm.term_of ct} ctxt);
 
     val _ =
       cond_tracing ctxt (fn () =>
-        print_term ctxt "SIMPLIFIER INVOKED ON THE FOLLOWING TERM:" (term_of ct));
+        print_term ctxt "SIMPLIFIER INVOKED ON THE FOLLOWING TERM:" (Thm.term_of ct));
   in bottomc (mode, Option.map (Drule.flexflex_unique (SOME ctxt)) oo prover, maxidx) ctxt ct end;
 
 val simple_prover =
@@ -1356,7 +1357,7 @@
   | term_depth (f $ t) = 1 + Int.max (term_depth f, term_depth t)
   | term_depth _ = 0;
 
-val lhs_of_thm = #1 o Logic.dest_equals o prop_of;
+val lhs_of_thm = #1 o Logic.dest_equals o Thm.prop_of;
 
 (*folding should handle critical pairs!  E.g. K == Inl(0),  S == Inr(Inl(0))
   Returns longest lhs first to avoid folding its subexpressions.*)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/search.ML
--- a/src/Pure/search.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/search.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -56,7 +56,7 @@
 
 
 (*Predicate: Does the rule have fewer than n premises?*)
-fun has_fewer_prems n rule = (nprems_of rule < n);
+fun has_fewer_prems n rule = Thm.nprems_of rule < n;
 
 (*Apply a tactic if subgoals remain, else do nothing.*)
 val IF_UNSOLVED = COND (has_fewer_prems 1) all_tac;
@@ -67,16 +67,16 @@
 (*Execute tac1, but only execute tac2 if there are at least as many subgoals
   as before.  This ensures that tac2 is only applied to an outcome of tac1.*)
 fun (tac1 THEN_MAYBE tac2) st =
-  (tac1  THEN  COND (has_fewer_prems (nprems_of st)) all_tac tac2)  st;
+  (tac1 THEN COND (has_fewer_prems (Thm.nprems_of st)) all_tac tac2) st;
 
 fun (tac1 THEN_MAYBE' tac2) x = tac1 x THEN_MAYBE tac2 x;
 
 (*Tactical to reduce the number of premises by 1.
   If no subgoals then it must fail! *)
 fun DEPTH_SOLVE_1 tac st = st |>
-    (case nprems_of st of
-        0 => no_tac
-      | n => DEPTH_FIRST (has_fewer_prems n) tac);
+  (case Thm.nprems_of st of
+    0 => no_tac
+  | n => DEPTH_FIRST (has_fewer_prems n) tac);
 
 (*Uses depth-first search to solve ALL subgoals*)
 val DEPTH_SOLVE = DEPTH_FIRST (has_fewer_prems 1);
@@ -153,9 +153,9 @@
                          (fn()=> depth (bnd,inc) ((k,np,rgd,stq)::qs)))
 
                else
-               let val np' = nprems_of st
+               let val np' = Thm.nprems_of st
                      (*rgd' calculation assumes tactic operates on subgoal 1*)
-                   val rgd' = not (has_vars (hd (prems_of st)))
+                   val rgd' = not (has_vars (hd (Thm.prems_of st)))
                    val k' = k+np'-np+1  (*difference in # of subgoals, +1*)
                in  if k'+np' >= bnd
                    then depth (bnd, Int.min(inc, k'+np'+1-bnd)) qs
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/tactic.ML
--- a/src/Pure/tactic.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/tactic.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -206,7 +206,7 @@
       fun filtr (limit, []) = []
         | filtr (limit, th::ths) =
             if limit=0 then  []
-            else if could(pb, concl_of th)  then th :: filtr(limit-1, ths)
+            else if could(pb, Thm.concl_of th)  then th :: filtr(limit-1, ths)
             else filtr(limit,ths)
   in  filtr(limit,ths)  end;
 
@@ -221,7 +221,7 @@
     (case try Thm.major_prem_of th of
       SOME prem => (inet, Net.insert_term (K false) (prem, kbrl) enet)
     | NONE => error "insert_tagged_brl: elimination rule with no premises")
-  else (Net.insert_term (K false) (concl_of th, kbrl) inet, enet);
+  else (Net.insert_term (K false) (Thm.concl_of th, kbrl) inet, enet);
 
 (*delete one kbrl from the pair of nets*)
 fun eq_kbrl ((_, (_, th)), (_, (_, th'))) = Thm.eq_thm_prop (th, th')
@@ -256,7 +256,7 @@
 
 (*insert one tagged rl into the net*)
 fun insert_krl (krl as (k,th)) =
-  Net.insert_term (K false) (concl_of th, krl);
+  Net.insert_term (K false) (Thm.concl_of th, krl);
 
 (*build a net of rules for resolution*)
 fun build_net rls =
@@ -285,8 +285,8 @@
 (*** For Natural Deduction using (bires_flg, rule) pairs ***)
 
 (*The number of new subgoals produced by the brule*)
-fun subgoals_of_brl (true,rule)  = nprems_of rule - 1
-  | subgoals_of_brl (false,rule) = nprems_of rule;
+fun subgoals_of_brl (true, rule) = Thm.nprems_of rule - 1
+  | subgoals_of_brl (false, rule) = Thm.nprems_of rule;
 
 (*Less-than test: for sorting to minimize number of new subgoals*)
 fun lessb (brl1,brl2) = subgoals_of_brl brl1 < subgoals_of_brl brl2;
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/tactical.ML
--- a/src/Pure/tactical.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/tactical.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -290,19 +290,19 @@
 fun ALLGOALS tac st =
   let fun doall 0 = all_tac
         | doall n = tac(n) THEN doall(n-1)
-  in  doall(nprems_of st)st  end;
+  in  doall (Thm.nprems_of st) st  end;
 
 (*For n subgoals, performs tac(n) ORELSE ... ORELSE tac(1)  *)
 fun SOMEGOAL tac st =
   let fun find 0 = no_tac
         | find n = tac(n) ORELSE find(n-1)
-  in  find(nprems_of st)st  end;
+  in  find (Thm.nprems_of st) st  end;
 
 (*For n subgoals, performs tac(1) ORELSE ... ORELSE tac(n).
   More appropriate than SOMEGOAL in some cases.*)
 fun FIRSTGOAL tac st =
   let fun find (i,n) = if i>n then no_tac else  tac(i) ORELSE find (i+1,n)
-  in  find(1, nprems_of st)st  end;
+  in  find (1, Thm.nprems_of st) st  end;
 
 (*First subgoal only.*)
 fun HEADGOAL tac = tac 1;
@@ -346,12 +346,12 @@
   subgoal-based tactics this means subgoal i has been solved
   altogether -- no new subgoals have emerged.*)
 fun SOLVED' tac i st =
-  tac i st |> Seq.filter (fn st' => nprems_of st' < nprems_of st);
+  tac i st |> Seq.filter (fn st' => Thm.nprems_of st' < Thm.nprems_of st);
 
 (*Apply second tactic to all subgoals emerging from the first --
   following usual convention for subgoal-based tactics.*)
 fun (tac1 THEN_ALL_NEW tac2) i st =
-  st |> (tac1 i THEN (fn st' => Seq.INTERVAL tac2 i (i + nprems_of st' - nprems_of st) st'));
+  st |> (tac1 i THEN (fn st' => Seq.INTERVAL tac2 i (i + Thm.nprems_of st' - Thm.nprems_of st) st'));
 
 (*Repeatedly dig into any emerging subgoals.*)
 fun REPEAT_ALL_NEW tac =
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Pure/thm.ML
--- a/src/Pure/thm.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Pure/thm.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -9,26 +9,47 @@
 
 signature BASIC_THM =
   sig
+  type ctyp
+  type cterm
+  exception CTERM of string * cterm list
+  type thm
+  type conv = cterm -> thm
+  exception THM of string * int * thm list
+end;
+
+signature THM =
+sig
+  include BASIC_THM
+
   (*certified types*)
-  type ctyp
   val rep_ctyp: ctyp -> {thy: theory, T: typ, maxidx: int, sorts: sort Ord_List.T}
   val theory_of_ctyp: ctyp -> theory
   val typ_of: ctyp -> typ
   val ctyp_of: theory -> typ -> ctyp
+  val dest_ctyp: ctyp -> ctyp list
 
   (*certified terms*)
-  type cterm
-  exception CTERM of string * cterm list
   val rep_cterm: cterm -> {thy: theory, t: term, T: typ, maxidx: int, sorts: sort Ord_List.T}
   val crep_cterm: cterm -> {thy: theory, t: term, T: ctyp, maxidx: int, sorts: sort Ord_List.T}
   val theory_of_cterm: cterm -> theory
   val term_of: cterm -> term
+  val ctyp_of_term: cterm -> ctyp
   val cterm_of: theory -> term -> cterm
-  val ctyp_of_term: cterm -> ctyp
+  val dest_comb: cterm -> cterm * cterm
+  val dest_fun: cterm -> cterm
+  val dest_arg: cterm -> cterm
+  val dest_fun2: cterm -> cterm
+  val dest_arg1: cterm -> cterm
+  val dest_abs: string option -> cterm -> cterm * cterm
+  val apply: cterm -> cterm -> cterm
+  val lambda_name: string * cterm -> cterm -> cterm
+  val lambda: cterm -> cterm -> cterm
+  val adjust_maxidx_cterm: int -> cterm -> cterm
+  val incr_indexes_cterm: int -> cterm -> cterm
+  val match: cterm * cterm -> (ctyp * ctyp) list * (cterm * cterm) list
+  val first_order_match: cterm * cterm -> (ctyp * ctyp) list * (cterm * cterm) list
 
   (*theorems*)
-  type thm
-  type conv = cterm -> thm
   val rep_thm: thm ->
    {thy: theory,
     tags: Properties.T,
@@ -45,42 +66,22 @@
     hyps: cterm Ord_List.T,
     tpairs: (cterm * cterm) list,
     prop: cterm}
-  exception THM of string * int * thm list
+  val fold_terms: (term -> 'a -> 'a) -> thm -> 'a -> 'a
+  val terms_of_tpairs: (term * term) list -> term list
+  val full_prop_of: thm -> term
   val theory_of_thm: thm -> theory
+  val maxidx_of: thm -> int
+  val maxidx_thm: thm -> int -> int
+  val hyps_of: thm -> term list
   val prop_of: thm -> term
+  val tpairs_of: thm -> (term * term) list
   val concl_of: thm -> term
   val prems_of: thm -> term list
   val nprems_of: thm -> int
+  val no_prems: thm -> bool
+  val major_prem_of: thm -> term
   val cprop_of: thm -> cterm
   val cprem_of: thm -> int -> cterm
-end;
-
-signature THM =
-sig
-  include BASIC_THM
-  val dest_ctyp: ctyp -> ctyp list
-  val dest_comb: cterm -> cterm * cterm
-  val dest_fun: cterm -> cterm
-  val dest_arg: cterm -> cterm
-  val dest_fun2: cterm -> cterm
-  val dest_arg1: cterm -> cterm
-  val dest_abs: string option -> cterm -> cterm * cterm
-  val apply: cterm -> cterm -> cterm
-  val lambda_name: string * cterm -> cterm -> cterm
-  val lambda: cterm -> cterm -> cterm
-  val adjust_maxidx_cterm: int -> cterm -> cterm
-  val incr_indexes_cterm: int -> cterm -> cterm
-  val match: cterm * cterm -> (ctyp * ctyp) list * (cterm * cterm) list
-  val first_order_match: cterm * cterm -> (ctyp * ctyp) list * (cterm * cterm) list
-  val fold_terms: (term -> 'a -> 'a) -> thm -> 'a -> 'a
-  val terms_of_tpairs: (term * term) list -> term list
-  val full_prop_of: thm -> term
-  val maxidx_of: thm -> int
-  val maxidx_thm: thm -> int -> int
-  val hyps_of: thm -> term list
-  val tpairs_of: thm -> (term * term) list
-  val no_prems: thm -> bool
-  val major_prem_of: thm -> term
   val transfer: theory -> thm -> thm
   val weaken: cterm -> thm -> thm
   val weaken_sorts: sort list -> cterm -> cterm
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Sequents/modal.ML
--- a/src/Sequents/modal.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Sequents/modal.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -69,12 +69,12 @@
 
 fun UPTOGOAL n tf = let fun tac i = if i<n then all_tac
                                     else tf(i) THEN tac(i-1)
-                    in fn st => tac (nprems_of st) st end;
+                    in fn st => tac (Thm.nprems_of st) st end;
 
 (* Depth first search bounded by d *)
 fun solven_tac ctxt d n st = st |>
  (if d < 0 then no_tac
-  else if nprems_of st = 0 then all_tac
+  else if Thm.nprems_of st = 0 then all_tac
   else (DETERM(fres_safe_tac ctxt n) THEN UPTOGOAL n (solven_tac ctxt d)) ORELSE
            ((fres_unsafe_tac ctxt n  THEN UPTOGOAL n (solven_tac ctxt d)) APPEND
              (fres_bound_tac ctxt n  THEN UPTOGOAL n (solven_tac ctxt (d - 1)))));
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Sequents/prover.ML
--- a/src/Sequents/prover.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Sequents/prover.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -157,7 +157,7 @@
 
 
 (*Predicate: does the rule have n premises? *)
-fun has_prems n rule =  (nprems_of rule = n);
+fun has_prems n rule = (Thm.nprems_of rule = n);
 
 (*Continuation-style tactical for resolution.
   The list of rules is partitioned into 0, 1, 2 premises.
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Sequents/simpdata.ML
--- a/src/Sequents/simpdata.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Sequents/simpdata.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -12,7 +12,7 @@
 
 (*Make atomic rewrite rules*)
 fun atomize r =
- case concl_of r of
+ case Thm.concl_of r of
    Const(@{const_name Trueprop},_) $ Abs(_,_,a) $ Abs(_,_,c) =>
      (case (Cla.forms_of_seq a, Cla.forms_of_seq c) of
         ([], [p]) =>
@@ -28,7 +28,7 @@
  | _ => [r];
 
 (*Make meta-equalities.*)
-fun mk_meta_eq ctxt th = case concl_of th of
+fun mk_meta_eq ctxt th = case Thm.concl_of th of
     Const(@{const_name Pure.eq},_)$_$_ => th
   | Const(@{const_name Trueprop},_) $ Abs(_,_,a) $ Abs(_,_,c) =>
         (case (Cla.forms_of_seq a, Cla.forms_of_seq c) of
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Tools/Code/code_preproc.ML
--- a/src/Tools/Code/code_preproc.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Tools/Code/code_preproc.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -149,16 +149,16 @@
 fun conversion sandwich conv ctxt ct =
   let
     val (postproc, ct') = sandwich ctxt ct;
-  in postproc (conv ctxt (term_of ct') ct') end;
+  in postproc (conv ctxt (Thm.term_of ct') ct') end;
 
 fun evaluation sandwich lift_postproc eval ctxt t =
   let
     val cert = Thm.cterm_of (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt);
     val (postproc, ct') = sandwich ctxt (cert t);
   in
-    term_of ct'
+    Thm.term_of ct'
     |> eval ctxt
-    |> lift_postproc (term_of o Thm.rhs_of o postproc o Thm.reflexive o cert)
+    |> lift_postproc (Thm.term_of o Thm.rhs_of o postproc o Thm.reflexive o cert)
   end;
 
 end;
@@ -168,8 +168,8 @@
 
 fun normalized_tfrees_sandwich ctxt ct =
   let
-    val cert = cterm_of (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt);
-    val t = term_of ct;
+    val cert = Thm.cterm_of (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt);
+    val t = Thm.term_of ct;
     val vs_original = fold_term_types (K (fold_atyps (insert (eq_fst op =)
       o dest_TFree))) t [];
     val vs_normalized = Name.invent_names Name.context Name.aT (map snd vs_original);
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Tools/IsaPlanner/isand.ML
--- a/src/Tools/IsaPlanner/isand.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Tools/IsaPlanner/isand.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -142,7 +142,7 @@
   let
     val cert = Thm.cterm_of (Thm.theory_of_thm th);
 
-    val t = prop_of th;
+    val t = Thm.prop_of th;
 
     val prems = Logic.strip_imp_prems t;
     val aprems = map (Thm.trivial o cert) prems;
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Tools/atomize_elim.ML
--- a/src/Tools/atomize_elim.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Tools/atomize_elim.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -39,7 +39,7 @@
       val pi' = 0 :: map (Integer.add 1) pi
       val fwd  = Thm.trivial ct
                   |> Drule.rearrange_prems pi'
-      val back = Thm.trivial (snd (Thm.dest_implies (cprop_of fwd)))
+      val back = Thm.trivial (snd (Thm.dest_implies (Thm.cprop_of fwd)))
                   |> Drule.rearrange_prems (invert_perm pi')
     in Thm.equal_intr fwd back end
 
@@ -73,7 +73,7 @@
       (* move unrelated assumptions out of the quantification *)
       fun movea_conv ctxt ct =
           let
-            val _ $ Abs (_, _, b) = term_of ct
+            val _ $ Abs (_, _, b) = Thm.term_of ct
             val idxs = fold_index (fn (i, t) => not (Term.is_dependent t) ? cons i)
                        (Logic.strip_imp_prems b) []
                        |> rev
@@ -92,7 +92,7 @@
           else_conv (movea_conv ctxt)
 
       fun ms_conv ctxt ct =
-          if is_forall_thesis (term_of ct)
+          if is_forall_thesis (Thm.term_of ct)
           then moveq_conv ctxt ct
           else (implies_concl_conv (ms_conv ctxt)
             else_conv
@@ -116,8 +116,8 @@
       val quantify_thesis =
           if is_Bound thesis then all_tac
           else let
-              val cthesis = cterm_of thy thesis
-              val rule = instantiate' [SOME (ctyp_of_term cthesis)] [NONE, SOME cthesis]
+              val cthesis = Thm.cterm_of thy thesis
+              val rule = instantiate' [SOME (Thm.ctyp_of_term cthesis)] [NONE, SOME cthesis]
                          @{thm meta_spec}
             in
               compose_tac ctxt (false, rule, 1) i
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Tools/coherent.ML
--- a/src/Tools/coherent.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Tools/coherent.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -39,8 +39,8 @@
 val is_atomic = not o exists_Const (member (op =) Data.operator_names o #1);
 
 fun rulify_elim_conv ctxt ct =
-  if is_atomic (Logic.strip_imp_concl (term_of ct)) then Conv.all_conv ct
-  else Conv.concl_conv (length (Logic.strip_imp_prems (term_of ct)))
+  if is_atomic (Logic.strip_imp_concl (Thm.term_of ct)) then Conv.all_conv ct
+  else Conv.concl_conv (length (Logic.strip_imp_prems (Thm.term_of ct)))
     (Conv.rewr_conv (Thm.symmetric Data.atomize_elimL) then_conv
      Raw_Simplifier.rewrite ctxt true (map Thm.symmetric
        [Data.atomize_exL, Data.atomize_conjL, Data.atomize_disjL])) ct
@@ -66,7 +66,7 @@
 fun mk_rule ctxt th =
   let
     val th' = rulify_elim ctxt th;
-    val (prems, cases) = dest_elim (prop_of th')
+    val (prems, cases) = dest_elim (Thm.prop_of th')
   in (th', prems, cases) end;
 
 fun mk_dom ts = fold (fn t =>
@@ -187,7 +187,7 @@
               (cert (Var (ixn, Envir.subst_type tye T)), cert t)) (Vartab.dest env) @
             map (fn (ixnT, t) => (cert (Var ixnT), cert t)) insts) th)
         (map (nth asms) is);
-    val (_, cases) = dest_elim (prop_of th');
+    val (_, cases) = dest_elim (Thm.prop_of th');
   in
     (case (cases, prfs) of
       ([([], [_])], []) => th'
@@ -195,7 +195,7 @@
     | _ =>
         Drule.implies_elim_list
           (Thm.instantiate (Thm.match
-             (Drule.strip_imp_concl (cprop_of th'), goal)) th')
+             (Drule.strip_imp_concl (Thm.cprop_of th'), goal)) th')
           (map (thm_of_case_prf ctxt goal asms) (prfs ~~ cases)))
   end
 
@@ -219,12 +219,12 @@
   SUBPROOF (fn {prems = prems', concl, context = ctxt'', ...} =>
     let
       val xs =
-        map (term_of o #2) params @
+        map (Thm.term_of o #2) params @
         map (fn (_, s) => Free (s, the (Variable.default_type ctxt'' s)))
           (rev (Variable.dest_fixes ctxt''))  (* FIXME !? *)
     in
       (case
-        valid ctxt'' (map (mk_rule ctxt'') (prems' @ prems @ rules)) (term_of concl)
+        valid ctxt'' (map (mk_rule ctxt'') (prems' @ prems @ rules)) (Thm.term_of concl)
           (mk_dom xs) Net.empty 0 0 of
         NONE => no_tac
       | SOME prf => resolve_tac ctxt'' [thm_of_cl_prf ctxt'' concl [] prf] 1)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Tools/induct.ML
--- a/src/Tools/induct.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Tools/induct.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -156,13 +156,13 @@
   end;
 
 fun mk_swap_rrule ctxt ct =
-  (case find_eq ctxt (term_of ct) of
+  (case find_eq ctxt (Thm.term_of ct) of
     NONE => NONE
   | SOME (i, k, j) => SOME (swap_params_conv ctxt k j (K (swap_prems_conv i)) ct));
 
 val rearrange_eqs_simproc =
   Simplifier.simproc_global Pure.thy "rearrange_eqs" ["Pure.all t"]
-    (fn ctxt => fn t => mk_swap_rrule ctxt (cterm_of (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt) t));
+    (fn ctxt => fn t => mk_swap_rrule ctxt (Thm.cterm_of (Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt) t));
 
 
 (* rotate k premises to the left by j, skipping over first j premises *)
@@ -180,8 +180,8 @@
 (* rulify operators around definition *)
 
 fun rulify_defs_conv ctxt ct =
-  if exists_subterm (is_some o Induct_Args.dest_def) (term_of ct) andalso
-    not (is_some (Induct_Args.dest_def (drop_judgment ctxt (term_of ct))))
+  if exists_subterm (is_some o Induct_Args.dest_def) (Thm.term_of ct) andalso
+    not (is_some (Induct_Args.dest_def (drop_judgment ctxt (Thm.term_of ct))))
   then
     (Conv.forall_conv (rulify_defs_conv o snd) ctxt else_conv
      Conv.implies_conv (Conv.try_conv (rulify_defs_conv ctxt))
@@ -440,7 +440,7 @@
   Simplifier.full_rewrite (put_simpset (#4 (get_local ctxt)) ctxt);
 
 fun simplify_conv ctxt ct =
-  if exists_subterm (is_some o Induct_Args.dest_def) (term_of ct) then
+  if exists_subterm (is_some o Induct_Args.dest_def) (Thm.term_of ct) then
     (Conv.try_conv (rulify_defs_conv ctxt) then_conv simplify_conv' ctxt) ct
   else Conv.all_conv ct;
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Tools/induction.ML
--- a/src/Tools/induction.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Tools/induction.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -20,7 +20,7 @@
   if not(forall (null o #2 o #1) cases) then arg
   else
     let
-      val (prems, concl) = Logic.strip_horn (prop_of th);
+      val (prems, concl) = Logic.strip_horn (Thm.prop_of th);
       val prems' = drop consumes prems;
       val ps = preds_of concl;
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Tools/misc_legacy.ML
--- a/src/Tools/misc_legacy.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Tools/misc_legacy.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -193,7 +193,7 @@
             and concl_vars = Term.add_vars (Logic.strip_imp_concl prop) []
             val subgoal_insts = map (mk_subgoal_inst concl_vars) subgoal_vars
             val st' = Thm.instantiate ([], map mk_ctpair subgoal_insts) st
-            val emBs = map (cterm o embed) (prems_of st')
+            val emBs = map (cterm o embed) (Thm.prems_of st')
             val Cth  = implies_elim_list st' (map (elim o Thm.assume) emBs)
         in  (*restore the unknowns to the hypotheses*)
             free_instantiate (map swap_ctpair insts @
@@ -205,7 +205,7 @@
       (*function to replace the current subgoal*)
       fun next st =
         Thm.bicompose (SOME ctxt) {flatten = true, match = false, incremented = false}
-          (false, relift st, nprems_of st) gno state
+          (false, relift st, Thm.nprems_of st) gno state
   in Seq.maps next (tacf subprems (Thm.trivial (cterm concl))) end;
 
 fun print_vars_terms ctxt n thm =
@@ -265,8 +265,8 @@
          let fun newName (ix,_) = (ix, gensym (string_of_indexname ix))
              val alist = map newName vars
              fun mk_inst (v,T) =
-                 (cterm_of thy (Var(v,T)),
-                  cterm_of thy (Free(((the o AList.lookup (op =) alist) v), T)))
+                 (Thm.cterm_of thy (Var(v,T)),
+                  Thm.cterm_of thy (Free(((the o AList.lookup (op =) alist) v), T)))
              val insts = map mk_inst vars
              fun thaw i th' = (*i is non-negative increment for Var indexes*)
                  th' |> forall_intr_list (map #2 insts)
@@ -289,8 +289,8 @@
              val (alist, _) =
                  fold_rev newName vars ([], Thm.fold_terms Term.add_free_names fth [])
              fun mk_inst (v, T) =
-                 (cterm_of thy (Var(v,T)),
-                  cterm_of thy (Free(((the o AList.lookup (op =) alist) v), T)))
+                 (Thm.cterm_of thy (Var(v,T)),
+                  Thm.cterm_of thy (Free(((the o AList.lookup (op =) alist) v), T)))
              val insts = map mk_inst vars
              fun thaw th' =
                  th' |> forall_intr_list (map #2 insts)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Tools/nbe.ML
--- a/src/Tools/nbe.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Tools/nbe.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -589,7 +589,7 @@
 val (_, raw_oracle) = Context.>>> (Context.map_theory_result
   (Thm.add_oracle (@{binding normalization_by_evaluation},
     fn (nbe_program_idx_tab, ctxt, vs_ty_t, deps, ct) =>
-      mk_equals ctxt ct (eval_term nbe_program_idx_tab ctxt (term_of ct) vs_ty_t deps))));
+      mk_equals ctxt ct (eval_term nbe_program_idx_tab ctxt (Thm.term_of ct) vs_ty_t deps))));
 
 fun oracle nbe_program_idx_tab ctxt vs_ty_t deps ct =
   raw_oracle (nbe_program_idx_tab, ctxt, vs_ty_t, deps, ct);
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Tools/quickcheck.ML
--- a/src/Tools/quickcheck.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Tools/quickcheck.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -344,7 +344,7 @@
     fun strip (Const (@{const_name Pure.all}, _) $ Abs (_, _, t)) = strip t
       | strip t = t;
     val {goal = st, ...} = Proof.raw_goal state;
-    val (gi, frees) = Logic.goal_params (prop_of st) i;
+    val (gi, frees) = Logic.goal_params (Thm.prop_of st) i;
     val some_locale = Named_Target.bottom_locale_of lthy;
     val assms =
       if Config.get lthy no_assms then []
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/Tools/try.ML
--- a/src/Tools/try.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/Tools/try.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -35,7 +35,7 @@
   | serial_commas conj [s1, s2, s3] = [s1 ^ ",", s2 ^ ",", conj, s3]
   | serial_commas conj (s :: ss) = s ^ "," :: serial_commas conj ss
 
-val subgoal_count = Logic.count_prems o prop_of o #goal o Proof.goal
+val subgoal_count = Logic.count_prems o Thm.prop_of o #goal o Proof.goal
 
 
 (* configuration *)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/ZF/Tools/datatype_package.ML
--- a/src/ZF/Tools/datatype_package.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/ZF/Tools/datatype_package.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -345,7 +345,7 @@
     con1(x)=con1(y) ==> x=y, con1(x)=con1(y) <-> x=y, etc.  *)
   fun mk_free s =
     let
-      val thy = theory_of_thm elim;
+      val thy = Thm.theory_of_thm elim;
       val ctxt = Proof_Context.init_global thy;
     in
       Goal.prove_global thy [] [] (Syntax.read_prop ctxt s)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/ZF/Tools/induct_tacs.ML
--- a/src/ZF/Tools/induct_tacs.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/ZF/Tools/induct_tacs.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -92,12 +92,12 @@
   let
     val thy = Proof_Context.theory_of ctxt
     val ({context = ctxt', asms, ...}, _) = Subgoal.focus ctxt i state
-    val tn = find_tname ctxt' var (map term_of asms)
+    val tn = find_tname ctxt' var (map Thm.term_of asms)
     val rule =
         if exh then #exhaustion (datatype_info thy tn)
                else #induct  (datatype_info thy tn)
     val (Const(@{const_name mem},_) $ Var(ixn,_) $ _) =
-        (case prems_of rule of
+        (case Thm.prems_of rule of
              [] => error "induction is not available for this datatype"
            | major::_ => FOLogic.dest_Trueprop major)
   in
@@ -125,7 +125,7 @@
         map (head_of o const_of o FOLogic.dest_Trueprop o Thm.prop_of) case_eqns;
 
     val Const (@{const_name mem}, _) $ _ $ data =
-        FOLogic.dest_Trueprop (hd (prems_of elim));
+        FOLogic.dest_Trueprop (hd (Thm.prems_of elim));
 
     val Const(big_rec_name, _) = head_of data;
 
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/ZF/Tools/inductive_package.ML
--- a/src/ZF/Tools/inductive_package.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/ZF/Tools/inductive_package.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -494,13 +494,13 @@
        The name "x.1" comes from the "RS spec" !*)
      val inst =
          case elem_frees of [_] => I
-            | _ => Drule.instantiate_normalize ([], [(cterm_of thy (Var(("x",1), Ind_Syntax.iT)),
-                                      cterm_of thy elem_tuple)]);
+            | _ => Drule.instantiate_normalize ([], [(Thm.cterm_of thy (Var(("x",1), Ind_Syntax.iT)),
+                                      Thm.cterm_of thy elem_tuple)]);
 
      (*strip quantifier and the implication*)
      val induct0 = inst (quant_induct RS @{thm spec} RSN (2, @{thm rev_mp}));
 
-     val Const (@{const_name Trueprop}, _) $ (pred_var $ _) = concl_of induct0
+     val Const (@{const_name Trueprop}, _) $ (pred_var $ _) = Thm.concl_of induct0
 
      val induct =
        CP.split_rule_var (Proof_Context.init_global thy)
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/ZF/Tools/primrec_package.ML
--- a/src/ZF/Tools/primrec_package.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/ZF/Tools/primrec_package.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -103,7 +103,7 @@
       | use_fabs t       = t
 
     val cnames         = map (#1 o dest_Const) constructors
-    and recursor_pairs = map (dest_eqn o concl_of) rec_rewrites
+    and recursor_pairs = map (dest_eqn o Thm.concl_of) rec_rewrites
 
     fun absterm (Free x, body) = absfree x body
       | absterm (t, body) = Abs("rec", Ind_Syntax.iT, abstract_over (t, body))
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/ZF/arith_data.ML
--- a/src/ZF/arith_data.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/ZF/arith_data.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -63,7 +63,7 @@
 fun is_eq_thm th =
     can FOLogic.dest_eq (FOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Thm.prop_of th));
 
-fun add_chyps chyps ct = Drule.list_implies (map cprop_of chyps, ct);
+fun add_chyps chyps ct = Drule.list_implies (map Thm.cprop_of chyps, ct);
 
 fun prove_conv name tacs ctxt prems (t,u) =
   if t aconv u then NONE
diff -r 09722854b8f4 -r 3c94c44dfc0f src/ZF/simpdata.ML
--- a/src/ZF/simpdata.ML	Wed Mar 04 16:51:11 2015 +0100
+++ b/src/ZF/simpdata.ML	Wed Mar 04 20:16:39 2015 +0100
@@ -18,7 +18,7 @@
                      SOME rls => maps (atomize (conn_pairs, mem_pairs)) ([th] RL rls)
                    | NONE => [th])
             | _ => [th]
-  in case concl_of th of
+  in case Thm.concl_of th of
          Const(@{const_name Trueprop},_) $ P =>
             (case P of
                  Const(@{const_name mem},_) $ a $ b => tryrules mem_pairs b