# HG changeset patch
# User nipkow
# Date 1242488651 -7200
# Node ID 138eae50855610ed750fbcae1b65daa77656e4e5
# Parent  8741df04d1aea480b4b772f5c7a23a867e63aefb
proof tuned

diff -r 8741df04d1ae -r 138eae508556 src/HOL/MicroJava/BV/BVExample.thy
--- a/src/HOL/MicroJava/BV/BVExample.thy	Sat May 16 11:28:23 2009 +0200
+++ b/src/HOL/MicroJava/BV/BVExample.thy	Sat May 16 17:44:11 2009 +0200
@@ -69,10 +69,9 @@
 lemma subcls1:
   "subcls1 E = (\<lambda>C D. (C, D) \<in> {(list_name,Object), (test_name,Object), (Xcpt NullPointer, Object),
                 (Xcpt ClassCast, Object), (Xcpt OutOfMemory, Object)})"
-apply (simp add: subcls1_def2)
+apply (simp add: subcls1_def2 del:singleton_conj_conv2)
 apply (simp add: name_defs class_defs system_defs E_def class_def)
-apply (auto simp: expand_fun_eq name_defs[symmetric] class_defs split:split_if_asm)
-apply(simp add:name_defs)+
+apply (auto simp: expand_fun_eq split: split_if_asm)
 done
 
 text {* The subclass relation is acyclic; hence its converse is well founded: *}