# HG changeset patch # User haftmann # Date 1410027154 -7200 # Node ID 1b3fbfb859804c250100b817bf82d1bb35ab04b9 # Parent 1fee63e0377df048932a4d517642f86a95187813 theory about lexicographic ordering on functions diff -r 1fee63e0377d -r 1b3fbfb85980 CONTRIBUTORS --- a/CONTRIBUTORS Sat Sep 06 20:12:32 2014 +0200 +++ b/CONTRIBUTORS Sat Sep 06 20:12:34 2014 +0200 @@ -6,6 +6,10 @@ Contributions to this Isabelle version -------------------------------------- +* September 2014: Florian Haftmann, TUM + Lexicographic order on functions and + sum/product over function bodies. + * August 2014: Manuel Eberl, TUM Generic euclidean algorithms for gcd et al. diff -r 1fee63e0377d -r 1b3fbfb85980 src/HOL/Library/Fun_Lexorder.thy --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/src/HOL/Library/Fun_Lexorder.thy Sat Sep 06 20:12:34 2014 +0200 @@ -0,0 +1,95 @@ +(* Author: Florian Haftmann, TU Muenchen *) + +header \Lexical order on functions\ + +theory Fun_Lexorder +imports Main +begin + +definition less_fun :: "('a::linorder \ 'b::linorder) \ ('a \ 'b) \ bool" +where + "less_fun f g \ (\k. f k < g k \ (\k' < k. f k' = g k'))" + +lemma less_funI: + assumes "\k. f k < g k \ (\k' < k. f k' = g k')" + shows "less_fun f g" + using assms by (simp add: less_fun_def) + +lemma less_funE: + assumes "less_fun f g" + obtains k where "f k < g k" and "\k'. k' < k \ f k' = g k'" + using assms unfolding less_fun_def by blast + +lemma less_fun_asym: + assumes "less_fun f g" + shows "\ less_fun g f" +proof + from assms obtain k1 where k1: "f k1 < g k1" "\k'. k' < k1 \ f k' = g k'" + by (blast elim!: less_funE) + assume "less_fun g f" then obtain k2 where k2: "g k2 < f k2" "\k'. k' < k2 \ g k' = f k'" + by (blast elim!: less_funE) + show False proof (cases k1 k2 rule: linorder_cases) + case equal with k1 k2 show False by simp + next + case less with k2 have "g k1 = f k1" by simp + with k1 show False by simp + next + case greater with k1 have "f k2 = g k2" by simp + with k2 show False by simp + qed +qed + +lemma less_fun_irrefl: + "\ less_fun f f" +proof + assume "less_fun f f" + then obtain k where k: "f k < f k" + by (blast elim!: less_funE) + then show False by simp +qed + +lemma less_fun_trans: + assumes "less_fun f g" and "less_fun g h" + shows "less_fun f h" +proof (rule less_funI) + from `less_fun f g` obtain k1 where k1: "f k1 < g k1" "\k'. k' < k1 \ f k' = g k'" + by (blast elim!: less_funE) + from `less_fun g h` obtain k2 where k2: "g k2 < h k2" "\k'. k' < k2 \ g k' = h k'" + by (blast elim!: less_funE) + show "\k. f k < h k \ (\k'k'. k' < k1 \ g k' = h k'" by simp_all + with k1 show ?thesis by (auto intro: exI [of _ k1]) + next + case greater with k1 have "f k2 = g k2" "\k'. k' < k2 \ f k' = g k'" by simp_all + with k2 show ?thesis by (auto intro: exI [of _ k2]) + qed +qed + +lemma order_less_fun: + "class.order (\f g. less_fun f g \ f = g) less_fun" + by (rule order_strictI) (auto intro: less_fun_trans intro!: less_fun_irrefl less_fun_asym) + +lemma less_fun_trichotomy: + assumes "finite {k. f k \ g k}" + shows "less_fun f g \ f = g \ less_fun g f" +proof - + { def K \ "{k. f k \ g k}" + assume "f \ g" + then obtain k' where "f k' \ g k'" by auto + then have [simp]: "K \ {}" by (auto simp add: K_def) + with assms have [simp]: "finite K" by (simp add: K_def) + def q \ "Min K" + then have "q \ K" and "\k. k \ K \ k \ q" by auto + then have "\k. \ k \ q \ k \ K" by blast + then have *: "\k. k < q \ f k = g k" by (simp add: K_def) + from `q \ K` have "f q \ g q" by (simp add: K_def) + then have "f q < g q \ f q > g q" by auto + with * have "less_fun f g \ less_fun g f" + by (auto intro!: less_funI) + } then show ?thesis by blast +qed + +end diff -r 1fee63e0377d -r 1b3fbfb85980 src/HOL/Library/Library.thy --- a/src/HOL/Library/Library.thy Sat Sep 06 20:12:32 2014 +0200 +++ b/src/HOL/Library/Library.thy Sat Sep 06 20:12:34 2014 +0200 @@ -26,6 +26,7 @@ Function_Division Function_Growth Fundamental_Theorem_Algebra + Fun_Lexorder Indicator_Function Infinite_Set Inner_Product