# HG changeset patch
# User nipkow
# Date 1639035149 -3600
# Node ID 1c50ddcf6a01200d2cfe187ebec4236a90306d00
# Parent  56247fdb8bbb7d7b036d11b64b16532d5f9e2b19
Rewrite: added links to docu, made more prominent

diff -r 56247fdb8bbb -r 1c50ddcf6a01 src/HOL/Examples/Rewrite_Examples.thy
--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/src/HOL/Examples/Rewrite_Examples.thy	Thu Dec 09 08:32:29 2021 +0100
@@ -0,0 +1,301 @@
+theory Rewrite_Examples
+imports Main "HOL-Library.Rewrite"
+begin
+
+section \<open>The rewrite Proof Method by Example\<close>
+
+text\<open>
+This theory gives an overview over the features of the pattern-based rewrite proof method.
+
+Documentation: @{url "https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.04082"}
+\<close>
+
+lemma
+  fixes a::int and b::int and c::int
+  assumes "P (b + a)"
+  shows "P (a + b)"
+by (rewrite at "a + b" add.commute)
+   (rule assms)
+
+(* Selecting a specific subterm in a large, ambiguous term. *)
+lemma
+  fixes a b c :: int
+  assumes "f (a - a + (a - a)) + f (   0    + c) = f 0 + f c"
+  shows   "f (a - a + (a - a)) + f ((a - a) + c) = f 0 + f c"
+  by (rewrite in "f _ + f \<hole> = _" diff_self) fact
+
+lemma
+  fixes a b c :: int
+  assumes "f (a - a +    0   ) + f ((a - a) + c) = f 0 + f c"
+  shows   "f (a - a + (a - a)) + f ((a - a) + c) = f 0 + f c"
+  by (rewrite at "f (_ + \<hole>) + f _ = _" diff_self) fact
+
+lemma
+  fixes a b c :: int
+  assumes "f (  0   + (a - a)) + f ((a - a) + c) = f 0 + f c"
+  shows   "f (a - a + (a - a)) + f ((a - a) + c) = f 0 + f c"
+  by (rewrite in "f (\<hole> + _) + _ = _" diff_self) fact
+
+lemma
+  fixes a b c :: int
+  assumes "f (a - a +    0   ) + f ((a - a) + c) = f 0 + f c"
+  shows   "f (a - a + (a - a)) + f ((a - a) + c) = f 0 + f c"
+  by (rewrite in "f (_ + \<hole>) + _ = _" diff_self) fact
+
+lemma
+  fixes x y :: nat
+  shows"x + y > c \<Longrightarrow> y + x > c"
+  by (rewrite at "\<hole> > c" add.commute) assumption
+
+(* We can also rewrite in the assumptions.  *)
+lemma
+  fixes x y :: nat
+  assumes "y + x > c \<Longrightarrow> y + x > c"
+  shows   "x + y > c \<Longrightarrow> y + x > c"
+  by (rewrite in asm add.commute) fact
+
+lemma
+  fixes x y :: nat
+  assumes "y + x > c \<Longrightarrow> y + x > c"
+  shows   "x + y > c \<Longrightarrow> y + x > c"
+  by (rewrite in "x + y > c" at asm add.commute) fact
+
+lemma
+  fixes x y :: nat
+  assumes "y + x > c \<Longrightarrow> y + x > c"
+  shows   "x + y > c \<Longrightarrow> y + x > c"
+  by (rewrite at "\<hole> > c" at asm  add.commute) fact
+
+lemma
+  assumes "P {x::int. y + 1 = 1 + x}"
+  shows   "P {x::int. y + 1 = x + 1}"
+  by (rewrite at "x+1" in "{x::int. \<hole> }" add.commute) fact
+
+lemma
+  assumes "P {x::int. y + 1 = 1 + x}"
+  shows   "P {x::int. y + 1 = x + 1}"
+  by (rewrite at "any_identifier_will_work+1" in "{any_identifier_will_work::int. \<hole> }" add.commute)
+   fact
+
+lemma
+  assumes "P {(x::nat, y::nat, z). x + z * 3 = Q (\<lambda>s t. s * t + y - 3)}"
+  shows   "P {(x::nat, y::nat, z). x + z * 3 = Q (\<lambda>s t. y + s * t - 3)}"
+  by (rewrite at "b + d * e" in "\<lambda>(a, b, c). _ = Q (\<lambda>d e. \<hole>)" add.commute) fact
+
+(* This is not limited to the first assumption *)
+lemma
+  assumes "PROP P \<equiv> PROP Q"
+  shows "PROP R \<Longrightarrow> PROP P \<Longrightarrow> PROP Q"
+    by (rewrite at asm assms)
+
+lemma
+  assumes "PROP P \<equiv> PROP Q"
+  shows "PROP R \<Longrightarrow> PROP R \<Longrightarrow> PROP P \<Longrightarrow> PROP Q"
+    by (rewrite at asm assms)
+
+(* Rewriting "at asm" selects each full assumption, not any parts *)
+lemma
+  assumes "(PROP P \<Longrightarrow> PROP Q) \<equiv> (PROP S \<Longrightarrow> PROP R)"
+  shows "PROP S \<Longrightarrow> (PROP P \<Longrightarrow> PROP Q) \<Longrightarrow> PROP R"
+  apply (rewrite at asm assms)
+  apply assumption
+  done
+
+
+
+(* Rewriting with conditional rewriting rules works just as well. *)
+lemma test_theorem:
+  fixes x :: nat
+  shows "x \<le> y \<Longrightarrow> x \<ge> y \<Longrightarrow> x = y"
+  by (rule Orderings.order_antisym)
+
+(* Premises of the conditional rule yield new subgoals. The
+   assumptions of the goal are propagated into these subgoals
+*)
+lemma
+  fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
+  shows "f x \<le> 0 \<Longrightarrow> f x \<ge> 0 \<Longrightarrow> f x = 0"
+  apply (rewrite at "f x" to "0" test_theorem)
+  apply assumption
+  apply assumption
+  apply (rule refl)
+  done
+
+(* This holds also for rewriting in assumptions. The order of assumptions is preserved *)
+lemma
+  assumes rewr: "PROP P \<Longrightarrow> PROP Q \<Longrightarrow> PROP R \<equiv> PROP R'"
+  assumes A1: "PROP S \<Longrightarrow> PROP T \<Longrightarrow> PROP U \<Longrightarrow> PROP P"
+  assumes A2: "PROP S \<Longrightarrow> PROP T \<Longrightarrow> PROP U \<Longrightarrow> PROP Q"
+  assumes C: "PROP S \<Longrightarrow> PROP R' \<Longrightarrow> PROP T \<Longrightarrow> PROP U \<Longrightarrow> PROP V"
+  shows "PROP S \<Longrightarrow> PROP R \<Longrightarrow> PROP T \<Longrightarrow> PROP U \<Longrightarrow> PROP V"
+  apply (rewrite at asm rewr)
+  apply (fact A1)
+  apply (fact A2)
+  apply (fact C)
+  done
+
+
+(*
+   Instantiation.
+
+   Since all rewriting is now done via conversions,
+   instantiation becomes fairly easy to do.
+*)
+
+(* We first introduce a function f and an extended
+   version of f that is annotated with an invariant. *)
+fun f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat" where "f n = n"
+definition "f_inv (I :: nat \<Rightarrow> bool) n \<equiv> f n"
+
+lemma annotate_f: "f = f_inv I"
+  by (simp add: f_inv_def fun_eq_iff)
+
+(* We have a lemma with a bound variable n, and
+   want to add an invariant to f. *)
+lemma
+  assumes "P (\<lambda>n. f_inv (\<lambda>_. True) n + 1) = x"
+  shows "P (\<lambda>n. f n + 1) = x"
+  by (rewrite to "f_inv (\<lambda>_. True)" annotate_f) fact
+
+(* We can also add an invariant that contains the variable n bound in the outer context.
+   For this, we need to bind this variable to an identifier. *)
+lemma
+  assumes "P (\<lambda>n. f_inv (\<lambda>x. n < x + 1) n + 1) = x"
+  shows "P (\<lambda>n. f n + 1) = x"
+  by (rewrite in "\<lambda>n. \<hole>" to "f_inv (\<lambda>x. n < x + 1)" annotate_f) fact
+
+(* Any identifier will work *)
+lemma
+  assumes "P (\<lambda>n. f_inv (\<lambda>x. n < x + 1) n + 1) = x"
+  shows "P (\<lambda>n. f n + 1) = x"
+  by (rewrite in "\<lambda>abc. \<hole>" to "f_inv (\<lambda>x. abc < x + 1)" annotate_f) fact
+
+(* The "for" keyword. *)
+lemma
+  assumes "P (2 + 1)"
+  shows "\<And>x y. P (1 + 2 :: nat)"
+by (rewrite in "P (1 + 2)" at for (x) add.commute) fact
+
+lemma
+  assumes "\<And>x y. P (y + x)"
+  shows "\<And>x y. P (x + y :: nat)"
+by (rewrite in "P (x + _)" at for (x y) add.commute) fact
+
+lemma
+  assumes "\<And>x y z. y + x + z = z + y + (x::int)"
+  shows   "\<And>x y z. x + y + z = z + y + (x::int)"
+by (rewrite at "x + y" in "x + y + z" in for (x y z) add.commute) fact
+
+lemma
+  assumes "\<And>x y z. z + (x + y) = z + y + (x::int)"
+  shows   "\<And>x y z. x + y + z = z + y + (x::int)"
+by (rewrite at "(_ + y) + z" in for (y z) add.commute) fact
+
+lemma
+  assumes "\<And>x y z. x + y + z = y + z + (x::int)"
+  shows   "\<And>x y z. x + y + z = z + y + (x::int)"
+by (rewrite at "\<hole> + _" at "_ = \<hole>" in for () add.commute) fact
+
+lemma
+  assumes eq: "\<And>x. P x \<Longrightarrow> g x = x"
+  assumes f1: "\<And>x. Q x \<Longrightarrow> P x"
+  assumes f2: "\<And>x. Q x \<Longrightarrow> x"
+  shows "\<And>x. Q x \<Longrightarrow> g x"
+  apply (rewrite at "g x" in for (x) eq)
+  apply (fact f1)
+  apply (fact f2)
+  done
+
+(* The for keyword can be used anywhere in the pattern where there is an \<And>-Quantifier. *)
+lemma
+  assumes "(\<And>(x::int). x < 1 + x)"
+  and     "(x::int) + 1 > x"
+  shows   "(\<And>(x::int). x + 1 > x) \<Longrightarrow> (x::int) + 1 > x"
+by (rewrite at "x + 1" in for (x) at asm add.commute)
+   (rule assms)
+
+(* The rewrite method also has an ML interface *)
+lemma
+  assumes "\<And>a b. P ((a + 1) * (1 + b)) "
+  shows "\<And>a b :: nat. P ((a + 1) * (b + 1))"
+  apply (tactic \<open>
+    let
+      val (x, ctxt) = yield_singleton Variable.add_fixes "x" \<^context>
+      (* Note that the pattern order is reversed *)
+      val pat = [
+        Rewrite.For [(x, SOME \<^Type>\<open>nat\<close>)],
+        Rewrite.In,
+        Rewrite.Term (\<^Const>\<open>plus \<^Type>\<open>nat\<close> for \<open>Free (x, \<^Type>\<open>nat\<close>)\<close> \<^term>\<open>1 :: nat\<close>\<close>, [])]
+      val to = NONE
+    in CCONVERSION (Rewrite.rewrite_conv ctxt (pat, to) @{thms add.commute}) 1 end
+  \<close>)
+  apply (fact assms)
+  done
+
+lemma
+  assumes "Q (\<lambda>b :: int. P (\<lambda>a. a + b) (\<lambda>a. a + b))"
+  shows "Q (\<lambda>b :: int. P (\<lambda>a. a + b) (\<lambda>a. b + a))"
+  apply (tactic \<open>
+    let
+      val (x, ctxt) = yield_singleton Variable.add_fixes "x" \<^context>
+      val pat = [
+        Rewrite.Concl,
+        Rewrite.In,
+        Rewrite.Term (Free ("Q", (\<^Type>\<open>int\<close> --> TVar (("'b",0), [])) --> \<^Type>\<open>bool\<close>)
+          $ Abs ("x", \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>, Rewrite.mk_hole 1 (\<^Type>\<open>int\<close> --> TVar (("'b",0), [])) $ Bound 0), [(x, \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>)]),
+        Rewrite.In,
+        Rewrite.Term (\<^Const>\<open>plus \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for \<open>Free (x, \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>)\<close> \<open>Var (("c", 0), \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>)\<close>\<close>, [])
+        ]
+      val to = NONE
+    in CCONVERSION (Rewrite.rewrite_conv ctxt (pat, to) @{thms add.commute}) 1 end
+  \<close>)
+  apply (fact assms)
+  done
+
+(* There is also conversion-like rewrite function: *)
+ML \<open>
+  val ct = \<^cprop>\<open>Q (\<lambda>b :: int. P (\<lambda>a. a + b) (\<lambda>a. b + a))\<close>
+  val (x, ctxt) = yield_singleton Variable.add_fixes "x" \<^context>
+  val pat = [
+    Rewrite.Concl,
+    Rewrite.In,
+    Rewrite.Term (Free ("Q", (\<^typ>\<open>int\<close> --> TVar (("'b",0), [])) --> \<^typ>\<open>bool\<close>)
+      $ Abs ("x", \<^typ>\<open>int\<close>, Rewrite.mk_hole 1 (\<^typ>\<open>int\<close> --> TVar (("'b",0), [])) $ Bound 0), [(x, \<^typ>\<open>int\<close>)]),
+    Rewrite.In,
+    Rewrite.Term (\<^Const>\<open>plus \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for \<open>Free (x, \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>)\<close> \<open>Var (("c", 0), \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>)\<close>\<close>, [])
+    ]
+  val to = NONE
+  val th = Rewrite.rewrite_conv ctxt (pat, to) @{thms add.commute} ct
+\<close>
+
+section \<open>Regression tests\<close>
+
+ML \<open>
+  val ct = \<^cterm>\<open>(\<lambda>b :: int. (\<lambda>a. b + a))\<close>
+  val (x, ctxt) = yield_singleton Variable.add_fixes "x" \<^context>
+  val pat = [
+    Rewrite.In,
+    Rewrite.Term (\<^Const>\<open>plus \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for \<open>Var (("c", 0), \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>)\<close> \<open>Var (("c", 0), \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>)\<close>\<close>, [])
+    ]
+  val to = NONE
+  val _ =
+    case try (Rewrite.rewrite_conv ctxt (pat, to) @{thms add.commute}) ct of
+      NONE => ()
+    | _ => error "should not have matched anything"
+\<close>
+
+ML \<open>
+  Rewrite.params_pconv (Conv.all_conv |> K |> K) \<^context> (Vartab.empty, []) \<^cterm>\<open>\<And>x. PROP A\<close>
+\<close>
+
+lemma
+  assumes eq: "PROP A \<Longrightarrow> PROP B \<equiv> PROP C"
+  assumes f1: "PROP D \<Longrightarrow> PROP A"
+  assumes f2: "PROP D \<Longrightarrow> PROP C"
+  shows "\<And>x. PROP D \<Longrightarrow> PROP B"
+  apply (rewrite eq)
+  apply (fact f1)
+  apply (fact f2)
+  done
+
+end
diff -r 56247fdb8bbb -r 1c50ddcf6a01 src/HOL/Library/Rewrite.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Library/Rewrite.thy	Mon Dec 06 15:34:54 2021 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/Library/Rewrite.thy	Thu Dec 09 08:32:29 2021 +0100
@@ -2,6 +2,8 @@
     Author:     Christoph Traut, Lars Noschinski, TU Muenchen
 
 Proof method "rewrite" with support for subterm-selection based on patterns.
+
+Documentation: https://arxiv.org/abs/2111.04082
 *)
 
 theory Rewrite
diff -r 56247fdb8bbb -r 1c50ddcf6a01 src/HOL/ROOT
--- a/src/HOL/ROOT	Mon Dec 06 15:34:54 2021 +0100
+++ b/src/HOL/ROOT	Thu Dec 09 08:32:29 2021 +0100
@@ -36,6 +36,7 @@
     "ML"
     Peirce
     Records
+    Rewrite_Examples
     Seq
     Sqrt
   document_files
@@ -695,7 +696,6 @@
     Reflection_Examples
     Refute_Examples
     Residue_Ring
-    Rewrite_Examples
     SOS
     SOS_Cert
     Serbian
diff -r 56247fdb8bbb -r 1c50ddcf6a01 src/HOL/ex/Rewrite_Examples.thy
--- a/src/HOL/ex/Rewrite_Examples.thy	Mon Dec 06 15:34:54 2021 +0100
+++ /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
@@ -1,300 +0,0 @@
-theory Rewrite_Examples
-imports Main "HOL-Library.Rewrite"
-begin
-
-section \<open>The rewrite Proof Method by Example\<close>
-
-(* This file is intended to give an overview over
-   the features of the pattern-based rewrite proof method.
-
-   See also https://www21.in.tum.de/~noschinl/Pattern-2014/
-*)
-lemma
-  fixes a::int and b::int and c::int
-  assumes "P (b + a)"
-  shows "P (a + b)"
-by (rewrite at "a + b" add.commute)
-   (rule assms)
-
-(* Selecting a specific subterm in a large, ambiguous term. *)
-lemma
-  fixes a b c :: int
-  assumes "f (a - a + (a - a)) + f (   0    + c) = f 0 + f c"
-  shows   "f (a - a + (a - a)) + f ((a - a) + c) = f 0 + f c"
-  by (rewrite in "f _ + f \<hole> = _" diff_self) fact
-
-lemma
-  fixes a b c :: int
-  assumes "f (a - a +    0   ) + f ((a - a) + c) = f 0 + f c"
-  shows   "f (a - a + (a - a)) + f ((a - a) + c) = f 0 + f c"
-  by (rewrite at "f (_ + \<hole>) + f _ = _" diff_self) fact
-
-lemma
-  fixes a b c :: int
-  assumes "f (  0   + (a - a)) + f ((a - a) + c) = f 0 + f c"
-  shows   "f (a - a + (a - a)) + f ((a - a) + c) = f 0 + f c"
-  by (rewrite in "f (\<hole> + _) + _ = _" diff_self) fact
-
-lemma
-  fixes a b c :: int
-  assumes "f (a - a +    0   ) + f ((a - a) + c) = f 0 + f c"
-  shows   "f (a - a + (a - a)) + f ((a - a) + c) = f 0 + f c"
-  by (rewrite in "f (_ + \<hole>) + _ = _" diff_self) fact
-
-lemma
-  fixes x y :: nat
-  shows"x + y > c \<Longrightarrow> y + x > c"
-  by (rewrite at "\<hole> > c" add.commute) assumption
-
-(* We can also rewrite in the assumptions.  *)
-lemma
-  fixes x y :: nat
-  assumes "y + x > c \<Longrightarrow> y + x > c"
-  shows   "x + y > c \<Longrightarrow> y + x > c"
-  by (rewrite in asm add.commute) fact
-
-lemma
-  fixes x y :: nat
-  assumes "y + x > c \<Longrightarrow> y + x > c"
-  shows   "x + y > c \<Longrightarrow> y + x > c"
-  by (rewrite in "x + y > c" at asm add.commute) fact
-
-lemma
-  fixes x y :: nat
-  assumes "y + x > c \<Longrightarrow> y + x > c"
-  shows   "x + y > c \<Longrightarrow> y + x > c"
-  by (rewrite at "\<hole> > c" at asm  add.commute) fact
-
-lemma
-  assumes "P {x::int. y + 1 = 1 + x}"
-  shows   "P {x::int. y + 1 = x + 1}"
-  by (rewrite at "x+1" in "{x::int. \<hole> }" add.commute) fact
-
-lemma
-  assumes "P {x::int. y + 1 = 1 + x}"
-  shows   "P {x::int. y + 1 = x + 1}"
-  by (rewrite at "any_identifier_will_work+1" in "{any_identifier_will_work::int. \<hole> }" add.commute)
-   fact
-
-lemma
-  assumes "P {(x::nat, y::nat, z). x + z * 3 = Q (\<lambda>s t. s * t + y - 3)}"
-  shows   "P {(x::nat, y::nat, z). x + z * 3 = Q (\<lambda>s t. y + s * t - 3)}"
-  by (rewrite at "b + d * e" in "\<lambda>(a, b, c). _ = Q (\<lambda>d e. \<hole>)" add.commute) fact
-
-(* This is not limited to the first assumption *)
-lemma
-  assumes "PROP P \<equiv> PROP Q"
-  shows "PROP R \<Longrightarrow> PROP P \<Longrightarrow> PROP Q"
-    by (rewrite at asm assms)
-
-lemma
-  assumes "PROP P \<equiv> PROP Q"
-  shows "PROP R \<Longrightarrow> PROP R \<Longrightarrow> PROP P \<Longrightarrow> PROP Q"
-    by (rewrite at asm assms)
-
-(* Rewriting "at asm" selects each full assumption, not any parts *)
-lemma
-  assumes "(PROP P \<Longrightarrow> PROP Q) \<equiv> (PROP S \<Longrightarrow> PROP R)"
-  shows "PROP S \<Longrightarrow> (PROP P \<Longrightarrow> PROP Q) \<Longrightarrow> PROP R"
-  apply (rewrite at asm assms)
-  apply assumption
-  done
-
-
-
-(* Rewriting with conditional rewriting rules works just as well. *)
-lemma test_theorem:
-  fixes x :: nat
-  shows "x \<le> y \<Longrightarrow> x \<ge> y \<Longrightarrow> x = y"
-  by (rule Orderings.order_antisym)
-
-(* Premises of the conditional rule yield new subgoals. The
-   assumptions of the goal are propagated into these subgoals
-*)
-lemma
-  fixes f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat"
-  shows "f x \<le> 0 \<Longrightarrow> f x \<ge> 0 \<Longrightarrow> f x = 0"
-  apply (rewrite at "f x" to "0" test_theorem)
-  apply assumption
-  apply assumption
-  apply (rule refl)
-  done
-
-(* This holds also for rewriting in assumptions. The order of assumptions is preserved *)
-lemma
-  assumes rewr: "PROP P \<Longrightarrow> PROP Q \<Longrightarrow> PROP R \<equiv> PROP R'"
-  assumes A1: "PROP S \<Longrightarrow> PROP T \<Longrightarrow> PROP U \<Longrightarrow> PROP P"
-  assumes A2: "PROP S \<Longrightarrow> PROP T \<Longrightarrow> PROP U \<Longrightarrow> PROP Q"
-  assumes C: "PROP S \<Longrightarrow> PROP R' \<Longrightarrow> PROP T \<Longrightarrow> PROP U \<Longrightarrow> PROP V"
-  shows "PROP S \<Longrightarrow> PROP R \<Longrightarrow> PROP T \<Longrightarrow> PROP U \<Longrightarrow> PROP V"
-  apply (rewrite at asm rewr)
-  apply (fact A1)
-  apply (fact A2)
-  apply (fact C)
-  done
-
-
-(*
-   Instantiation.
-
-   Since all rewriting is now done via conversions,
-   instantiation becomes fairly easy to do.
-*)
-
-(* We first introduce a function f and an extended
-   version of f that is annotated with an invariant. *)
-fun f :: "nat \<Rightarrow> nat" where "f n = n"
-definition "f_inv (I :: nat \<Rightarrow> bool) n \<equiv> f n"
-
-lemma annotate_f: "f = f_inv I"
-  by (simp add: f_inv_def fun_eq_iff)
-
-(* We have a lemma with a bound variable n, and
-   want to add an invariant to f. *)
-lemma
-  assumes "P (\<lambda>n. f_inv (\<lambda>_. True) n + 1) = x"
-  shows "P (\<lambda>n. f n + 1) = x"
-  by (rewrite to "f_inv (\<lambda>_. True)" annotate_f) fact
-
-(* We can also add an invariant that contains the variable n bound in the outer context.
-   For this, we need to bind this variable to an identifier. *)
-lemma
-  assumes "P (\<lambda>n. f_inv (\<lambda>x. n < x + 1) n + 1) = x"
-  shows "P (\<lambda>n. f n + 1) = x"
-  by (rewrite in "\<lambda>n. \<hole>" to "f_inv (\<lambda>x. n < x + 1)" annotate_f) fact
-
-(* Any identifier will work *)
-lemma
-  assumes "P (\<lambda>n. f_inv (\<lambda>x. n < x + 1) n + 1) = x"
-  shows "P (\<lambda>n. f n + 1) = x"
-  by (rewrite in "\<lambda>abc. \<hole>" to "f_inv (\<lambda>x. abc < x + 1)" annotate_f) fact
-
-(* The "for" keyword. *)
-lemma
-  assumes "P (2 + 1)"
-  shows "\<And>x y. P (1 + 2 :: nat)"
-by (rewrite in "P (1 + 2)" at for (x) add.commute) fact
-
-lemma
-  assumes "\<And>x y. P (y + x)"
-  shows "\<And>x y. P (x + y :: nat)"
-by (rewrite in "P (x + _)" at for (x y) add.commute) fact
-
-lemma
-  assumes "\<And>x y z. y + x + z = z + y + (x::int)"
-  shows   "\<And>x y z. x + y + z = z + y + (x::int)"
-by (rewrite at "x + y" in "x + y + z" in for (x y z) add.commute) fact
-
-lemma
-  assumes "\<And>x y z. z + (x + y) = z + y + (x::int)"
-  shows   "\<And>x y z. x + y + z = z + y + (x::int)"
-by (rewrite at "(_ + y) + z" in for (y z) add.commute) fact
-
-lemma
-  assumes "\<And>x y z. x + y + z = y + z + (x::int)"
-  shows   "\<And>x y z. x + y + z = z + y + (x::int)"
-by (rewrite at "\<hole> + _" at "_ = \<hole>" in for () add.commute) fact
-
-lemma
-  assumes eq: "\<And>x. P x \<Longrightarrow> g x = x"
-  assumes f1: "\<And>x. Q x \<Longrightarrow> P x"
-  assumes f2: "\<And>x. Q x \<Longrightarrow> x"
-  shows "\<And>x. Q x \<Longrightarrow> g x"
-  apply (rewrite at "g x" in for (x) eq)
-  apply (fact f1)
-  apply (fact f2)
-  done
-
-(* The for keyword can be used anywhere in the pattern where there is an \<And>-Quantifier. *)
-lemma
-  assumes "(\<And>(x::int). x < 1 + x)"
-  and     "(x::int) + 1 > x"
-  shows   "(\<And>(x::int). x + 1 > x) \<Longrightarrow> (x::int) + 1 > x"
-by (rewrite at "x + 1" in for (x) at asm add.commute)
-   (rule assms)
-
-(* The rewrite method also has an ML interface *)
-lemma
-  assumes "\<And>a b. P ((a + 1) * (1 + b)) "
-  shows "\<And>a b :: nat. P ((a + 1) * (b + 1))"
-  apply (tactic \<open>
-    let
-      val (x, ctxt) = yield_singleton Variable.add_fixes "x" \<^context>
-      (* Note that the pattern order is reversed *)
-      val pat = [
-        Rewrite.For [(x, SOME \<^Type>\<open>nat\<close>)],
-        Rewrite.In,
-        Rewrite.Term (\<^Const>\<open>plus \<^Type>\<open>nat\<close> for \<open>Free (x, \<^Type>\<open>nat\<close>)\<close> \<^term>\<open>1 :: nat\<close>\<close>, [])]
-      val to = NONE
-    in CCONVERSION (Rewrite.rewrite_conv ctxt (pat, to) @{thms add.commute}) 1 end
-  \<close>)
-  apply (fact assms)
-  done
-
-lemma
-  assumes "Q (\<lambda>b :: int. P (\<lambda>a. a + b) (\<lambda>a. a + b))"
-  shows "Q (\<lambda>b :: int. P (\<lambda>a. a + b) (\<lambda>a. b + a))"
-  apply (tactic \<open>
-    let
-      val (x, ctxt) = yield_singleton Variable.add_fixes "x" \<^context>
-      val pat = [
-        Rewrite.Concl,
-        Rewrite.In,
-        Rewrite.Term (Free ("Q", (\<^Type>\<open>int\<close> --> TVar (("'b",0), [])) --> \<^Type>\<open>bool\<close>)
-          $ Abs ("x", \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>, Rewrite.mk_hole 1 (\<^Type>\<open>int\<close> --> TVar (("'b",0), [])) $ Bound 0), [(x, \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>)]),
-        Rewrite.In,
-        Rewrite.Term (\<^Const>\<open>plus \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for \<open>Free (x, \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>)\<close> \<open>Var (("c", 0), \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>)\<close>\<close>, [])
-        ]
-      val to = NONE
-    in CCONVERSION (Rewrite.rewrite_conv ctxt (pat, to) @{thms add.commute}) 1 end
-  \<close>)
-  apply (fact assms)
-  done
-
-(* There is also conversion-like rewrite function: *)
-ML \<open>
-  val ct = \<^cprop>\<open>Q (\<lambda>b :: int. P (\<lambda>a. a + b) (\<lambda>a. b + a))\<close>
-  val (x, ctxt) = yield_singleton Variable.add_fixes "x" \<^context>
-  val pat = [
-    Rewrite.Concl,
-    Rewrite.In,
-    Rewrite.Term (Free ("Q", (\<^typ>\<open>int\<close> --> TVar (("'b",0), [])) --> \<^typ>\<open>bool\<close>)
-      $ Abs ("x", \<^typ>\<open>int\<close>, Rewrite.mk_hole 1 (\<^typ>\<open>int\<close> --> TVar (("'b",0), [])) $ Bound 0), [(x, \<^typ>\<open>int\<close>)]),
-    Rewrite.In,
-    Rewrite.Term (\<^Const>\<open>plus \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for \<open>Free (x, \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>)\<close> \<open>Var (("c", 0), \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>)\<close>\<close>, [])
-    ]
-  val to = NONE
-  val th = Rewrite.rewrite_conv ctxt (pat, to) @{thms add.commute} ct
-\<close>
-
-section \<open>Regression tests\<close>
-
-ML \<open>
-  val ct = \<^cterm>\<open>(\<lambda>b :: int. (\<lambda>a. b + a))\<close>
-  val (x, ctxt) = yield_singleton Variable.add_fixes "x" \<^context>
-  val pat = [
-    Rewrite.In,
-    Rewrite.Term (\<^Const>\<open>plus \<^Type>\<open>int\<close> for \<open>Var (("c", 0), \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>)\<close> \<open>Var (("c", 0), \<^Type>\<open>int\<close>)\<close>\<close>, [])
-    ]
-  val to = NONE
-  val _ =
-    case try (Rewrite.rewrite_conv ctxt (pat, to) @{thms add.commute}) ct of
-      NONE => ()
-    | _ => error "should not have matched anything"
-\<close>
-
-ML \<open>
-  Rewrite.params_pconv (Conv.all_conv |> K |> K) \<^context> (Vartab.empty, []) \<^cterm>\<open>\<And>x. PROP A\<close>
-\<close>
-
-lemma
-  assumes eq: "PROP A \<Longrightarrow> PROP B \<equiv> PROP C"
-  assumes f1: "PROP D \<Longrightarrow> PROP A"
-  assumes f2: "PROP D \<Longrightarrow> PROP C"
-  shows "\<And>x. PROP D \<Longrightarrow> PROP B"
-  apply (rewrite eq)
-  apply (fact f1)
-  apply (fact f2)
-  done
-
-end