# HG changeset patch
# User paulson
# Date 1253882907 -3600
# Node ID 224ceb576bc3b1a3457a3eec6878c8658e58cdcd
# Parent  b68f3afdc1370e59519a19a1925d23f345d630d9# Parent  836ec9d0a0c8e38dc82fcca7a19f69782fbb7077
merged

diff -r b68f3afdc137 -r 224ceb576bc3 src/HOL/RComplete.thy
--- a/src/HOL/RComplete.thy	Fri Sep 25 10:20:03 2009 +0200
+++ b/src/HOL/RComplete.thy	Fri Sep 25 13:48:27 2009 +0100
@@ -14,6 +14,9 @@
 lemma real_sum_of_halves: "x/2 + x/2 = (x::real)"
   by simp
 
+lemma abs_diff_less_iff:
+  "(\<bar>x - a\<bar> < (r::'a::ordered_idom)) = (a - r < x \<and> x < a + r)"
+  by auto
 
 subsection {* Completeness of Positive Reals *}
 
@@ -301,6 +304,20 @@
   qed
 qed
 
+text{*A version of the same theorem without all those predicates!*}
+lemma reals_complete2:
+  fixes S :: "(real set)"
+  assumes "\<exists>y. y\<in>S" and "\<exists>(x::real). \<forall>y\<in>S. y \<le> x"
+  shows "\<exists>x. (\<forall>y\<in>S. y \<le> x) & 
+               (\<forall>z. ((\<forall>y\<in>S. y \<le> z) --> x \<le> z))"
+proof -
+  have "\<exists>x. isLub UNIV S x" 
+    by (rule reals_complete)
+       (auto simp add: isLub_def isUb_def leastP_def setle_def setge_def prems)
+  thus ?thesis
+    by (metis UNIV_I isLub_isUb isLub_le_isUb isUbD isUb_def setleI)
+qed
+
 
 subsection {* The Archimedean Property of the Reals *}
 
diff -r b68f3afdc137 -r 224ceb576bc3 src/HOL/SEQ.thy
--- a/src/HOL/SEQ.thy	Fri Sep 25 10:20:03 2009 +0200
+++ b/src/HOL/SEQ.thy	Fri Sep 25 13:48:27 2009 +0100
@@ -500,6 +500,28 @@
 apply (drule LIMSEQ_minus, auto)
 done
 
+lemma lim_le:
+  fixes x :: real
+  assumes f: "convergent f" and fn_le: "!!n. f n \<le> x"
+  shows "lim f \<le> x"
+proof (rule classical)
+  assume "\<not> lim f \<le> x"
+  hence 0: "0 < lim f - x" by arith
+  have 1: "f----> lim f"
+    by (metis convergent_LIMSEQ_iff f) 
+  thus ?thesis
+    proof (simp add: LIMSEQ_iff)
+      assume "\<forall>r>0. \<exists>no. \<forall>n\<ge>no. \<bar>f n - lim f\<bar> < r"
+      hence "\<exists>no. \<forall>n\<ge>no. \<bar>f n - lim f\<bar> < lim f - x"
+	by (metis 0)
+      from this obtain no where "\<forall>n\<ge>no. \<bar>f n - lim f\<bar> < lim f - x"
+	by blast
+      thus "lim f \<le> x"
+	by (metis add_cancel_end add_minus_cancel diff_def linorder_linear 
+                  linorder_not_le minus_diff_eq abs_diff_less_iff fn_le) 
+    qed
+qed
+
 text{* Given a binary function @{text "f:: nat \<Rightarrow> 'a \<Rightarrow> 'a"}, its values are uniquely determined by a function g *}
 
 lemma nat_function_unique: "EX! g. g 0 = e \<and> (\<forall>n. g (Suc n) = f n (g n))"
@@ -1082,10 +1104,6 @@
 lemma isUb_UNIV_I: "(\<And>y. y \<in> S \<Longrightarrow> y \<le> u) \<Longrightarrow> isUb UNIV S u"
 by (simp add: isUbI setleI)
 
-lemma real_abs_diff_less_iff:
-  "(\<bar>x - a\<bar> < (r::real)) = (a - r < x \<and> x < a + r)"
-by auto
-
 locale real_Cauchy =
   fixes X :: "nat \<Rightarrow> real"
   assumes X: "Cauchy X"
@@ -1122,13 +1140,13 @@
   show "\<exists>x. x \<in> S"
   proof
     from N have "\<forall>n\<ge>N. X N - 1 < X n"
-      by (simp add: real_abs_diff_less_iff)
+      by (simp add: abs_diff_less_iff)
     thus "X N - 1 \<in> S" by (rule mem_S)
   qed
   show "\<exists>u. isUb UNIV S u"
   proof
     from N have "\<forall>n\<ge>N. X n < X N + 1"
-      by (simp add: real_abs_diff_less_iff)
+      by (simp add: abs_diff_less_iff)
     thus "isUb UNIV S (X N + 1)"
       by (rule bound_isUb)
   qed
@@ -1144,7 +1162,7 @@
     using CauchyD [OF X r] by auto
   hence "\<forall>n\<ge>N. norm (X n - X N) < r/2" by simp
   hence N: "\<forall>n\<ge>N. X N - r/2 < X n \<and> X n < X N + r/2"
-    by (simp only: real_norm_def real_abs_diff_less_iff)
+    by (simp only: real_norm_def abs_diff_less_iff)
 
   from N have "\<forall>n\<ge>N. X N - r/2 < X n" by fast
   hence "X N - r/2 \<in> S" by (rule mem_S)
@@ -1159,7 +1177,7 @@
     fix n assume n: "N \<le> n"
     from N n have "X n < X N + r/2" and "X N - r/2 < X n" by simp+
     thus "norm (X n - x) < r" using 1 2
-      by (simp add: real_abs_diff_less_iff)
+      by (simp add: abs_diff_less_iff)
   qed
 qed
 
diff -r b68f3afdc137 -r 224ceb576bc3 src/HOL/Series.thy
--- a/src/HOL/Series.thy	Fri Sep 25 10:20:03 2009 +0200
+++ b/src/HOL/Series.thy	Fri Sep 25 13:48:27 2009 +0100
@@ -104,6 +104,9 @@
      "summable f ==> (%n. setsum f {0..<n}) ----> (suminf f)"
 by (rule summable_sums [unfolded sums_def])
 
+lemma suminf_eq_lim: "suminf f = lim (%n. setsum f {0..<n})"
+  by (simp add: suminf_def sums_def lim_def) 
+
 (*-------------------
     sum is unique                    
  ------------------*)
@@ -112,6 +115,9 @@
 apply (auto intro!: LIMSEQ_unique simp add: sums_def)
 done
 
+lemma sums_iff: "f sums x \<longleftrightarrow> summable f \<and> (suminf f = x)"
+  by (metis summable_sums sums_summable sums_unique)
+
 lemma sums_split_initial_segment: "f sums s ==> 
   (%n. f(n + k)) sums (s - (SUM i = 0..< k. f i))"
   apply (unfold sums_def);
@@ -368,6 +374,11 @@
 apply (drule_tac x="n" in spec, simp)
 done
 
+lemma suminf_le:
+  fixes x :: real
+  shows "summable f \<Longrightarrow> (!!n. setsum f {0..<n} \<le> x) \<Longrightarrow> suminf f \<le> x"
+  by (simp add: summable_convergent_sumr_iff suminf_eq_lim lim_le) 
+
 lemma summable_Cauchy:
      "summable (f::nat \<Rightarrow> 'a::banach) =  
       (\<forall>e > 0. \<exists>N. \<forall>m \<ge> N. \<forall>n. norm (setsum f {m..<n}) < e)"