# HG changeset patch # User urbanc # Date 1188999992 -7200 # Node ID 888d56a8d9d344d784c207eaa3fbeefbf5a438b9 # Parent 7fa202789bf6890ae753fb8594606134b140c00a modified proofs so that they are not using claset() diff -r 7fa202789bf6 -r 888d56a8d9d3 src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_atoms.ML --- a/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_atoms.ML Tue Sep 04 15:30:31 2007 +0200 +++ b/src/HOL/Nominal/nominal_atoms.ML Wed Sep 05 15:46:32 2007 +0200 @@ -60,8 +60,7 @@ (* atom_decl ... *) fun create_nom_typedecls ak_names thy = let - val cla_s = claset_of thy; - + (* declares a type-decl for every atom-kind: *) (* that is typedecl *) val thy1 = TypedefPackage.add_typedecls (map (fn x => (x,[],NoSyn)) ak_names) thy; @@ -175,7 +174,7 @@ val i_type = Type(ak_name_qu,[]); val cat = Const ("Nominal.at",(Term.itselfT i_type) --> HOLogic.boolT); val at_type = Logic.mk_type i_type; - val simp_s = HOL_basic_ss addsimps PureThy.get_thmss thy5 + val simp_s = HOL_ss addsimps PureThy.get_thmss thy5 [Name "at_def", Name (ak_name ^ "_prm_" ^ ak_name ^ "_def"), Name (ak_name ^ "_prm_" ^ ak_name ^ ".simps"), @@ -186,7 +185,7 @@ val name = "at_"^ak_name^ "_inst"; val statement = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (cat $ at_type); - val proof = fn _ => auto_tac (cla_s,simp_s); + val proof = fn _ => simp_tac simp_s 1 in ((name, Goal.prove_global thy5 [] [] statement proof), []) @@ -239,7 +238,7 @@ val cpt = Const ("Nominal.pt",(Term.itselfT i_type1)-->(Term.itselfT i_type2)-->HOLogic.boolT); val pt_type = Logic.mk_type i_type1; val at_type = Logic.mk_type i_type2; - val simp_s = HOL_basic_ss addsimps PureThy.get_thmss thy7 + val simp_s = HOL_ss addsimps PureThy.get_thmss thy7 [Name "pt_def", Name ("pt_" ^ ak_name ^ "1"), Name ("pt_" ^ ak_name ^ "2"), @@ -248,7 +247,7 @@ val name = "pt_"^ak_name^ "_inst"; val statement = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (cpt $ pt_type $ at_type); - val proof = fn _ => auto_tac (cla_s,simp_s); + val proof = fn _ => simp_tac simp_s 1; in ((name, Goal.prove_global thy7 [] [] statement proof), []) end) ak_names_types); @@ -286,14 +285,14 @@ (Term.itselfT i_type1)-->(Term.itselfT i_type2)-->HOLogic.boolT); val fs_type = Logic.mk_type i_type1; val at_type = Logic.mk_type i_type2; - val simp_s = HOL_basic_ss addsimps PureThy.get_thmss thy11 + val simp_s = HOL_ss addsimps PureThy.get_thmss thy11 [Name "fs_def", Name ("fs_" ^ ak_name ^ "1")]; val name = "fs_"^ak_name^ "_inst"; val statement = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (cfs $ fs_type $ at_type); - val proof = fn _ => auto_tac (cla_s,simp_s); + val proof = fn _ => simp_tac simp_s 1; in ((name, Goal.prove_global thy11 [] [] statement proof), []) end) ak_names_types); @@ -344,7 +343,9 @@ val name = "cp_"^ak_name^ "_"^ak_name'^"_inst"; val statement = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (ccp $ cp_type $ at_type $ at_type'); - val proof = fn _ => EVERY [auto_tac (cla_s,simp_s), rtac cp1 1]; + val proof = fn _ => EVERY [simp_tac simp_s 1, + rtac allI 1, rtac allI 1, rtac allI 1, + rtac cp1 1]; in PureThy.add_thms [((name, Goal.prove_global thy' [] [] statement proof), [])] thy' end) @@ -367,7 +368,7 @@ (Term.itselfT i_type1)-->(Term.itselfT i_type2)-->HOLogic.boolT); val at_type = Logic.mk_type i_type1; val at_type' = Logic.mk_type i_type2; - val simp_s = HOL_basic_ss addsimps PureThy.get_thmss thy' + val simp_s = HOL_ss addsimps PureThy.get_thmss thy' [Name "disjoint_def", Name (ak_name^"_prm_"^ak_name'^"_def"), Name (ak_name'^"_prm_"^ak_name^"_def")]; @@ -375,7 +376,7 @@ val name = "dj_"^ak_name^"_"^ak_name'; val statement = HOLogic.mk_Trueprop (cdj $ at_type $ at_type'); - val proof = fn _ => auto_tac (cla_s,simp_s); + val proof = fn _ => simp_tac simp_s 1; in PureThy.add_thms [((name, Goal.prove_global thy' [] [] statement proof), [])] thy' end