# HG changeset patch # User wenzelm # Date 1005086823 -3600 # Node ID 8f41684d90e68382e165ddccda67b4de9ea92981 # Parent 8d65dd96381fa350f43b69c39d9963edede3c732 renamed Sqrt_Irrational.thy to Sqrt.thy; diff -r 8d65dd96381f -r 8f41684d90e6 src/HOL/Real/ex/Sqrt.thy --- /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 +++ b/src/HOL/Real/ex/Sqrt.thy Tue Nov 06 23:47:03 2001 +0100 @@ -0,0 +1,160 @@ +(* Title: HOL/Real/ex/Sqrt.thy + ID: $Id$ + Author: Markus Wenzel, TU Muenchen + License: GPL (GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE) +*) + +header {* Square roots of primes are irrational *} + +theory Sqrt = Primes + Real: + +syntax (xsymbols) (* FIXME move to main HOL (!?) *) + "_square" :: "'a => 'a" ("(_\)" [1000] 999) +syntax (HTML output) + "_square" :: "'a => 'a" ("(_\)" [1000] 999) +syntax (output) + "_square" :: "'a => 'a" ("(_^2)" [1000] 999) +translations + "x\" == "x^Suc (Suc 0)" + + +subsection {* The set of rational numbers *} + +constdefs + rationals :: "real set" ("\") + "\ == {x. \m n. n \ 0 \ \x\ = real (m::nat) / real (n::nat)}" + +theorem rationals_rep: "x \ \ ==> + \m n. n \ 0 \ \x\ = real m / real n \ gcd (m, n) = 1" +proof - + assume "x \ \" + then obtain m n :: nat where n: "n \ 0" and x_rat: "\x\ = real m / real n" + by (unfold rationals_def) blast + let ?gcd = "gcd (m, n)" + from n have gcd: "?gcd \ 0" by (simp add: gcd_zero) + let ?k = "m div ?gcd" + let ?l = "n div ?gcd" + let ?gcd' = "gcd (?k, ?l)" + have "?gcd dvd m" .. hence gcd_k: "?gcd * ?k = m" + by (rule dvd_mult_div_cancel) + have "?gcd dvd n" .. hence gcd_l: "?gcd * ?l = n" + by (rule dvd_mult_div_cancel) + + from n gcd_l have "?l \ 0" + by (auto iff del: neq0_conv) + moreover + have "\x\ = real ?k / real ?l" + proof - + from gcd have "real ?k / real ?l = real (?gcd * ?k) / real (?gcd * ?l)" + by (simp add: real_mult_div_cancel1) + also from gcd_k gcd_l have "... = real m / real n" by simp + also from x_rat have "... = \x\" .. + finally show ?thesis .. + qed + moreover + have "?gcd' = 1" + proof - + have "?gcd * ?gcd' = gcd (?gcd * ?k, ?gcd * ?l)" + by (rule gcd_mult_distrib2) + with gcd_k gcd_l have "?gcd * ?gcd' = ?gcd" by simp + with gcd show ?thesis by simp + qed + ultimately show ?thesis by blast +qed + +lemma [elim?]: "r \ \ ==> + (!!m n. n \ 0 ==> \r\ = real m / real n ==> gcd (m, n) = 1 ==> C) + ==> C" + by (insert rationals_rep) blast + + +subsection {* Main theorem *} + +text {* + The square root of any prime number (including @{text 2}) is + irrational. +*} + +theorem sqrt_prime_irrational: "x\ = real p ==> p \ prime ==> x \ \" +proof + assume x_sqrt: "x\ = real p" + assume p_prime: "p \ prime" + hence p: "1 < p" by (simp add: prime_def) + assume "x \ \" + then obtain m n where + n: "n \ 0" and x_rat: "\x\ = real m / real n" and gcd: "gcd (m, n) = 1" .. + have eq: "m\ = p * n\" + proof - + from n x_rat have "real m = \x\ * real n" by simp + hence "real (m\) = x\ * real (n\)" by (simp split: abs_split) + also from x_sqrt have "... = real (p * n\)" by simp + finally show ?thesis .. + qed + have "p dvd m \ p dvd n" + proof + from eq have "p dvd m\" .. + with p_prime show "p dvd m" by (rule prime_dvd_square) + then obtain k where "m = p * k" .. + with eq have "p * n\ = p\ * k\" by (auto simp add: mult_ac) + with p have "n\ = p * k\" by simp + hence "p dvd n\" .. + with p_prime show "p dvd n" by (rule prime_dvd_square) + qed + hence "p dvd gcd (m, n)" .. + with gcd have "p dvd 1" by simp + hence "p \ 1" by (simp add: dvd_imp_le) + with p show False by simp +qed + + +subsection {* Variations *} + +text {* + Just for the record: we instantiate the main theorem for the + specific prime number @{text 2} (real mathematicians would never do + this formally :-). +*} + +theorem "x\ = real (2::nat) ==> x \ \" +proof (rule sqrt_prime_irrational) + { + fix m :: nat assume dvd: "m dvd 2" + hence "m \ 2" by (simp add: dvd_imp_le) + moreover from dvd have "m \ 0" by (auto iff del: neq0_conv) + ultimately have "m = 1 \ m = 2" by arith + } + thus "2 \ prime" by (simp add: prime_def) +qed + +text {* + \medskip An alternative version of the main proof, using mostly + linear forward-reasoning. While this results in less top-down + structure, it is probably closer to proofs seen in mathematics. +*} + +theorem "x\ = real p ==> p \ prime ==> x \ \" +proof + assume x_sqrt: "x\ = real p" + assume p_prime: "p \ prime" + hence p: "1 < p" by (simp add: prime_def) + assume "x \ \" + then obtain m n where + n: "n \ 0" and x_rat: "\x\ = real m / real n" and gcd: "gcd (m, n) = 1" .. + from n x_rat have "real m = \x\ * real n" by simp + hence "real (m\) = x\ * real (n\)" by (simp split: abs_split) + also from x_sqrt have "... = real (p * n\)" by simp + finally have eq: "m\ = p * n\" .. + hence "p dvd m\" .. + with p_prime have dvd_m: "p dvd m" by (rule prime_dvd_square) + then obtain k where "m = p * k" .. + with eq have "p * n\ = p\ * k\" by (auto simp add: mult_ac) + with p have "n\ = p * k\" by simp + hence "p dvd n\" .. + with p_prime have "p dvd n" by (rule prime_dvd_square) + with dvd_m have "p dvd gcd (m, n)" by (rule gcd_greatest) + with gcd have "p dvd 1" by simp + hence "p \ 1" by (simp add: dvd_imp_le) + with p show False by simp +qed + +end diff -r 8d65dd96381f -r 8f41684d90e6 src/HOL/Real/ex/Sqrt_Irrational.thy --- a/src/HOL/Real/ex/Sqrt_Irrational.thy Tue Nov 06 23:45:58 2001 +0100 +++ /dev/null Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000 @@ -1,159 +0,0 @@ -(* Title: HOL/Real/ex/Sqrt_Irrational.thy - ID: $Id$ - Author: Markus Wenzel, TU Muenchen - License: GPL (GNU GENERAL PUBLIC LICENSE) -*) - -header {* Square roots of primes are irrational *} - -theory Sqrt_Irrational = Real + Primes: - -syntax (xsymbols) (* FIXME move to main HOL (!?) *) - "_square" :: "'a => 'a" ("(_\)" [1000] 999) -syntax (HTML output) - "_square" :: "'a => 'a" ("(_\)" [1000] 999) -syntax (output) - "_square" :: "'a => 'a" ("(_^2)" [1000] 999) -translations - "x\" == "x^Suc (Suc 0)" - - -subsection {* The set of rational numbers *} - -constdefs - rationals :: "real set" ("\") - "\ == {x. \m n. n \ 0 \ \x\ = real (m::nat) / real (n::nat)}" - -theorem rationals_rep: "x \ \ ==> - \m n. n \ 0 \ \x\ = real m / real n \ gcd (m, n) = 1" -proof - - assume "x \ \" - then obtain m n :: nat where n: "n \ 0" and x_rat: "\x\ = real m / real n" - by (unfold rationals_def) blast - let ?gcd = "gcd (m, n)" - from n have gcd: "?gcd \ 0" by (simp add: gcd_zero) - let ?k = "m div ?gcd" - let ?l = "n div ?gcd" - let ?gcd' = "gcd (?k, ?l)" - have "?gcd dvd m" .. hence gcd_k: "?gcd * ?k = m" - by (rule dvd_mult_div_cancel) - have "?gcd dvd n" .. hence gcd_l: "?gcd * ?l = n" - by (rule dvd_mult_div_cancel) - - from n gcd_l have "?l \ 0" - by (auto iff del: neq0_conv) - moreover - have "\x\ = real ?k / real ?l" - proof - - from gcd have "real ?k / real ?l = real (?gcd * ?k) / real (?gcd * ?l)" - by (simp add: real_mult_div_cancel1) - also from gcd_k gcd_l have "... = real m / real n" by simp - also from x_rat have "... = \x\" .. - finally show ?thesis .. - qed - moreover - have "?gcd' = 1" - proof - - have "?gcd * ?gcd' = gcd (?gcd * ?k, ?gcd * ?l)" - by (rule gcd_mult_distrib2) - with gcd_k gcd_l have "?gcd * ?gcd' = ?gcd" by simp - with gcd show ?thesis by simp - qed - ultimately show ?thesis by blast -qed - -lemma [elim?]: "r \ \ ==> - (!!m n. n \ 0 ==> \r\ = real m / real n ==> gcd (m, n) = 1 ==> C) ==> C" - by (insert rationals_rep) blast - - -subsection {* Main theorem *} - -text {* - The square root of any prime number (including @{text 2}) is - irrational. -*} - -theorem sqrt_prime_irrational: "x\ = real p ==> p \ prime ==> x \ \" -proof - assume x_sqrt: "x\ = real p" - assume p_prime: "p \ prime" - hence p: "1 < p" by (simp add: prime_def) - assume "x \ \" - then obtain m n where - n: "n \ 0" and x_rat: "\x\ = real m / real n" and gcd: "gcd (m, n) = 1" .. - have eq: "m\ = p * n\" - proof - - from n x_rat have "real m = \x\ * real n" by simp - hence "real (m\) = x\ * real (n\)" by (simp split: abs_split) - also from x_sqrt have "... = real (p * n\)" by simp - finally show ?thesis .. - qed - have "p dvd m \ p dvd n" - proof - from eq have "p dvd m\" .. - with p_prime show "p dvd m" by (rule prime_dvd_square) - then obtain k where "m = p * k" .. - with eq have "p * n\ = p\ * k\" by (auto simp add: mult_ac) - with p have "n\ = p * k\" by simp - hence "p dvd n\" .. - with p_prime show "p dvd n" by (rule prime_dvd_square) - qed - hence "p dvd gcd (m, n)" .. - with gcd have "p dvd 1" by simp - hence "p \ 1" by (simp add: dvd_imp_le) - with p show False by simp -qed - - -subsection {* Variations *} - -text {* - Just for the record: we instantiate the main theorem for the - specific prime number @{text 2} (real mathematicians would never do - this formally :-). -*} - -theorem "x\ = real (2::nat) ==> x \ \" -proof (rule sqrt_prime_irrational) - { - fix m :: nat assume dvd: "m dvd 2" - hence "m \ 2" by (simp add: dvd_imp_le) - moreover from dvd have "m \ 0" by (auto iff del: neq0_conv) - ultimately have "m = 1 \ m = 2" by arith - } - thus "2 \ prime" by (simp add: prime_def) -qed - -text {* - \medskip An alternative version of the main proof, using mostly - linear forward-reasoning. While this results in less top-down - structure, it is probably closer to proofs seen in mathematics. -*} - -theorem "x\ = real p ==> p \ prime ==> x \ \" -proof - assume x_sqrt: "x\ = real p" - assume p_prime: "p \ prime" - hence p: "1 < p" by (simp add: prime_def) - assume "x \ \" - then obtain m n where - n: "n \ 0" and x_rat: "\x\ = real m / real n" and gcd: "gcd (m, n) = 1" .. - from n x_rat have "real m = \x\ * real n" by simp - hence "real (m\) = x\ * real (n\)" by (simp split: abs_split) - also from x_sqrt have "... = real (p * n\)" by simp - finally have eq: "m\ = p * n\" .. - hence "p dvd m\" .. - with p_prime have dvd_m: "p dvd m" by (rule prime_dvd_square) - then obtain k where "m = p * k" .. - with eq have "p * n\ = p\ * k\" by (auto simp add: mult_ac) - with p have "n\ = p * k\" by simp - hence "p dvd n\" .. - with p_prime have "p dvd n" by (rule prime_dvd_square) - with dvd_m have "p dvd gcd (m, n)" by (rule gcd_greatest) - with gcd have "p dvd 1" by simp - hence "p \ 1" by (simp add: dvd_imp_le) - with p show False by simp -qed - -end