New proof of standardization theorem (inspired by Ralph Matthes).

--- /dev/null	Thu Jan 01 00:00:00 1970 +0000
+++ b/src/HOL/Lambda/Standardization.thy	Thu Sep 06 11:48:51 2007 +0200
@@ -0,0 +1,361 @@
+(*  Title:      HOL/Lambda/Standardization.thy
+    ID:         $Id$
+    Author:     Stefan Berghofer
+    Copyright   2005 TU Muenchen
+*)
+
+header {* Standardization *}
+
+theory Standardization
+imports NormalForm
+begin
+
+text {*
+Based on lecture notes by Ralph Matthes \cite{Matthes-ESSLLI2000},
+original proof idea due to Ralph Loader \cite{Loader1998}.
+*}
+
+
+subsection {* Standard reduction relation *}
+
+declare listrel_mono [mono_set]
+
+inductive
+  sred :: "dB \<Rightarrow> dB \<Rightarrow> bool"  (infixl "\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s" 50)
+  and sredlist :: "dB list \<Rightarrow> dB list \<Rightarrow> bool"  (infixl "[\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s]" 50)
+where
+  "s [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] t \<equiv> listrelp op \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s s t"
+| Var: "rs [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] rs' \<Longrightarrow> Var x \<degree>\<degree> rs \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s Var x \<degree>\<degree> rs'"
+| Abs: "r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r' \<Longrightarrow> ss [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] ss' \<Longrightarrow> Abs r \<degree>\<degree> ss \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s Abs r' \<degree>\<degree> ss'"
+| Beta: "r[s/0] \<degree>\<degree> ss \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s t \<Longrightarrow> Abs r \<degree> s \<degree>\<degree> ss \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s t"
+
+lemma refl_listrelp: "\<forall>x\<in>set xs. R x x \<Longrightarrow> listrelp R xs xs"
+  by (induct xs) (auto intro: listrelp.intros)
+
+lemma refl_sred: "t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s t"
+  by (induct t rule: Apps_dB_induct) (auto intro: refl_listrelp sred.intros)
+
+lemma refl_sreds: "ts [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] ts"
+  by (simp add: refl_sred refl_listrelp)
+
+lemma listrelp_conj1: "listrelp (\<lambda>x y. R x y \<and> S x y) x y \<Longrightarrow> listrelp R x y"
+  by (erule listrelp.induct) (auto intro: listrelp.intros)
+
+lemma listrelp_conj2: "listrelp (\<lambda>x y. R x y \<and> S x y) x y \<Longrightarrow> listrelp S x y"
+  by (erule listrelp.induct) (auto intro: listrelp.intros)
+
+lemma listrelp_app:
+  assumes xsys: "listrelp R xs ys"
+  shows "listrelp R xs' ys' \<Longrightarrow> listrelp R (xs @ xs') (ys @ ys')" using xsys
+  by (induct arbitrary: xs' ys') (auto intro: listrelp.intros)
+
+lemma lemma1:
+  assumes r: "r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r'" and s: "s \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s s'"
+  shows "r \<degree> s \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r' \<degree> s'" using r
+proof induct
+  case (Var rs rs' x)
+  then have "rs [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] rs'" by (rule listrelp_conj1)
+  moreover have "[s] [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] [s']" by (iprover intro: s listrelp.intros)
+  ultimately have "rs @ [s] [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] rs' @ [s']" by (rule listrelp_app)
+  hence "Var x \<degree>\<degree> (rs @ [s]) \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s Var x \<degree>\<degree> (rs' @ [s'])" by (rule sred.Var)
+  thus ?case by (simp only: app_last)
+next
+  case (Abs r r' ss ss')
+  from Abs(3) have "ss [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] ss'" by (rule listrelp_conj1)
+  moreover have "[s] [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] [s']" by (iprover intro: s listrelp.intros)
+  ultimately have "ss @ [s] [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] ss' @ [s']" by (rule listrelp_app)
+  with `r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r'` have "Abs r \<degree>\<degree> (ss @ [s]) \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s Abs r' \<degree>\<degree> (ss' @ [s'])"
+    by (rule sred.Abs)
+  thus ?case by (simp only: app_last)
+next
+  case (Beta r u ss t)
+  hence "r[u/0] \<degree>\<degree> (ss @ [s]) \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s t \<degree> s'" by (simp only: app_last)
+  hence "Abs r \<degree> u \<degree>\<degree> (ss @ [s]) \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s t \<degree> s'" by (rule sred.Beta)
+  thus ?case by (simp only: app_last)
+qed
+
+lemma lemma1':
+  assumes ts: "ts [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] ts'"
+  shows "r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r' \<Longrightarrow> r \<degree>\<degree> ts \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r' \<degree>\<degree> ts'" using ts
+  by (induct arbitrary: r r') (auto intro: lemma1)
+
+lemma lemma2_1:
+  assumes beta: "t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta> u"
+  shows "t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s u" using beta
+proof induct
+  case (beta s t)
+  have "Abs s \<degree> t \<degree>\<degree> [] \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s s[t/0] \<degree>\<degree> []" by (iprover intro: sred.Beta refl_sred)
+  thus ?case by simp
+next
+  case (appL s t u)
+  thus ?case by (iprover intro: lemma1 refl_sred)
+next
+  case (appR s t u)
+  thus ?case by (iprover intro: lemma1 refl_sred)
+next
+  case (abs s t)
+  hence "Abs s \<degree>\<degree> [] \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s Abs t \<degree>\<degree> []" by (iprover intro: sred.Abs listrelp.Nil)
+  thus ?case by simp
+qed
+
+lemma listrelp_betas:
+  assumes ts: "listrelp op \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta>\<^sup>* ts ts'"
+  shows "\<And>t t'. t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta>\<^sup>* t' \<Longrightarrow> t \<degree>\<degree> ts \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta>\<^sup>* t' \<degree>\<degree> ts'" using ts
+  by induct auto
+
+lemma lemma2_2:
+  assumes t: "t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s u"
+  shows "t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta>\<^sup>* u" using t
+  by induct (auto dest: listrelp_conj2
+    intro: listrelp_betas apps_preserves_beta converse_rtranclp_into_rtranclp)
+
+lemma sred_lift:
+  assumes s: "s \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s t"
+  shows "lift s i \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s lift t i" using s
+proof (induct arbitrary: i)
+  case (Var rs rs' x)
+  hence "map (\<lambda>t. lift t i) rs [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] map (\<lambda>t. lift t i) rs'"
+    by induct (auto intro: listrelp.intros)
+  thus ?case by (cases "x < i") (auto intro: sred.Var)
+next
+  case (Abs r r' ss ss')
+  from Abs(3) have "map (\<lambda>t. lift t i) ss [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] map (\<lambda>t. lift t i) ss'"
+    by induct (auto intro: listrelp.intros)
+  thus ?case by (auto intro: sred.Abs Abs)
+next
+  case (Beta r s ss t)
+  thus ?case by (auto intro: sred.Beta)
+qed
+
+lemma lemma3:
+  assumes r: "r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r'"
+  shows "s \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s s' \<Longrightarrow> r[s/x] \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r'[s'/x]" using r
+proof (induct arbitrary: s s' x)
+  case (Var rs rs' y)
+  hence "map (\<lambda>t. t[s/x]) rs [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] map (\<lambda>t. t[s'/x]) rs'"
+    by induct (auto intro: listrelp.intros Var)
+  moreover have "Var y[s/x] \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s Var y[s'/x]"
+  proof (cases "y < x")
+    case True thus ?thesis by simp (rule refl_sred)
+  next
+    case False
+    thus ?thesis
+      by (cases "y = x") (auto simp add: Var intro: refl_sred)
+  qed
+  ultimately show ?case by simp (rule lemma1')
+next
+  case (Abs r r' ss ss')
+  have "lift s 0 \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s lift s' 0" by (rule sred_lift)
+  hence "r[lift s 0/Suc x] \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r'[lift s' 0/Suc x]" by (fast intro: Abs)
+  moreover from Abs(3) have "map (\<lambda>t. t[s/x]) ss [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] map (\<lambda>t. t[s'/x]) ss'"
+    by induct (auto intro: listrelp.intros Abs)
+  ultimately show ?case by simp (rule sred.Abs)
+next
+  case (Beta r u ss t)
+  thus ?case by (auto simp add: subst_subst intro: sred.Beta)
+qed
+
+lemma lemma4_aux:
+  assumes rs: "listrelp (\<lambda>t u. t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s u \<and> (\<forall>r. u \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta> r \<longrightarrow> t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r)) rs rs'"
+  shows "rs' => ss \<Longrightarrow> rs [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] ss" using rs
+proof (induct arbitrary: ss)
+  case Nil
+  thus ?case by cases (auto intro: listrelp.Nil)
+next
+  case (Cons x y xs ys)
+  note Cons' = Cons
+  show ?case
+  proof (cases ss)
+    case Nil with Cons show ?thesis by simp
+  next
+    case (Cons y' ys')
+    hence ss: "ss = y' # ys'" by simp
+    from Cons Cons' have "y \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta> y' \<and> ys' = ys \<or> y' = y \<and> ys => ys'" by simp
+    hence "x # xs [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] y' # ys'"
+    proof
+      assume H: "y \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta> y' \<and> ys' = ys"
+      with Cons' have "x \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s y'" by blast
+      moreover from Cons' have "xs [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] ys" by (iprover dest: listrelp_conj1)
+      ultimately have "x # xs [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] y' # ys" by (rule listrelp.Cons)
+      with H show ?thesis by simp
+    next
+      assume H: "y' = y \<and> ys => ys'"
+      with Cons' have "x \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s y'" by blast
+      moreover from H have "xs [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] ys'" by (blast intro: Cons')
+      ultimately show ?thesis by (rule listrelp.Cons)
+    qed
+    with ss show ?thesis by simp
+  qed
+qed
+
+lemma lemma4:
+  assumes r: "r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r'"
+  shows "r' \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta> r'' \<Longrightarrow> r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r''" using r
+proof (induct arbitrary: r'')
+  case (Var rs rs' x)
+  then obtain ss where rs: "rs' => ss" and r'': "r'' = Var x \<degree>\<degree> ss"
+    by (blast dest: head_Var_reduction)
+  from Var(1) rs have "rs [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] ss" by (rule lemma4_aux)
+  hence "Var x \<degree>\<degree> rs \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s Var x \<degree>\<degree> ss" by (rule sred.Var)
+  with r'' show ?case by simp
+next
+  case (Abs r r' ss ss')
+  from `Abs r' \<degree>\<degree> ss' \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta> r''` show ?case
+  proof
+    fix s
+    assume r'': "r'' = s \<degree>\<degree> ss'"
+    assume "Abs r' \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta> s"
+    then obtain r''' where s: "s = Abs r'''" and r''': "r' \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta> r'''" by cases auto
+    from r''' have "r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r'''" by (blast intro: Abs)
+    moreover from Abs have "ss [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] ss'" by (iprover dest: listrelp_conj1)
+    ultimately have "Abs r \<degree>\<degree> ss \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s Abs r''' \<degree>\<degree> ss'" by (rule sred.Abs)
+    with r'' s show "Abs r \<degree>\<degree> ss \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r''" by simp
+  next
+    fix rs'
+    assume "ss' => rs'"
+    with Abs(3) have "ss [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] rs'" by (rule lemma4_aux)
+    with `r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r'` have "Abs r \<degree>\<degree> ss \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s Abs r' \<degree>\<degree> rs'" by (rule sred.Abs)
+    moreover assume "r'' = Abs r' \<degree>\<degree> rs'"
+    ultimately show "Abs r \<degree>\<degree> ss \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r''" by simp
+  next
+    fix t u' us'
+    assume "ss' = u' # us'"
+    with Abs(3) obtain u us where
+      ss: "ss = u # us" and u: "u \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s u'" and us: "us [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] us'"
+      by cases (auto dest!: listrelp_conj1)
+    have "r[u/0] \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r'[u'/0]" by (rule lemma3)
+    with us have "r[u/0] \<degree>\<degree> us \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r'[u'/0] \<degree>\<degree> us'" by (rule lemma1')
+    hence "Abs r \<degree> u \<degree>\<degree> us \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r'[u'/0] \<degree>\<degree> us'" by (rule sred.Beta)
+    moreover assume "Abs r' = Abs t" and "r'' = t[u'/0] \<degree>\<degree> us'"
+    ultimately show "Abs r \<degree>\<degree> ss \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r''" using ss by simp
+  qed
+next
+  case (Beta r s ss t)
+  show ?case
+    by (rule sred.Beta) (rule Beta)+
+qed
+
+lemma rtrancl_beta_sred:
+  assumes r: "r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta>\<^sup>* r'"
+  shows "r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r'" using r
+  by induct (iprover intro: refl_sred lemma4)+
+
+
+subsection {* Leftmost reduction and weakly normalizing terms *}
+
+inductive
+  lred :: "dB \<Rightarrow> dB \<Rightarrow> bool"  (infixl "\<rightarrow>\<^sub>l" 50)
+  and lredlist :: "dB list \<Rightarrow> dB list \<Rightarrow> bool"  (infixl "[\<rightarrow>\<^sub>l]" 50)
+where
+  "s [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>l] t \<equiv> listrelp op \<rightarrow>\<^sub>l s t"
+| Var: "rs [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>l] rs' \<Longrightarrow> Var x \<degree>\<degree> rs \<rightarrow>\<^sub>l Var x \<degree>\<degree> rs'"
+| Abs: "r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>l r' \<Longrightarrow> Abs r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>l Abs r'"
+| Beta: "r[s/0] \<degree>\<degree> ss \<rightarrow>\<^sub>l t \<Longrightarrow> Abs r \<degree> s \<degree>\<degree> ss \<rightarrow>\<^sub>l t"
+
+lemma lred_imp_sred:
+  assumes lred: "s \<rightarrow>\<^sub>l t"
+  shows "s \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s t" using lred
+proof induct
+  case (Var rs rs' x)
+  then have "rs [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>s] rs'"
+    by induct (iprover intro: listrelp.intros)+
+  then show ?case by (rule sred.Var)
+next
+  case (Abs r r')
+  from `r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r'`
+  have "Abs r \<degree>\<degree> [] \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s Abs r' \<degree>\<degree> []" using listrelp.Nil
+    by (rule sred.Abs)
+  then show ?case by simp
+next
+  case (Beta r s ss t)
+  from `r[s/0] \<degree>\<degree> ss \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s t`
+  show ?case by (rule sred.Beta)
+qed
+
+inductive WN :: "dB => bool"
+  where
+    Var: "listsp WN rs \<Longrightarrow> WN (Var n \<degree>\<degree> rs)"
+  | Lambda: "WN r \<Longrightarrow> WN (Abs r)"
+  | Beta: "WN ((r[s/0]) \<degree>\<degree> ss) \<Longrightarrow> WN ((Abs r \<degree> s) \<degree>\<degree> ss)"
+
+lemma listrelp_imp_listsp1:
+  assumes H: "listrelp (\<lambda>x y. P x) xs ys"
+  shows "listsp P xs" using H
+  by induct auto
+
+lemma listrelp_imp_listsp2:
+  assumes H: "listrelp (\<lambda>x y. P y) xs ys"
+  shows "listsp P ys" using H
+  by induct auto
+
+lemma lemma5:
+  assumes lred: "r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>l r'"
+  shows "WN r" and "NF r'" using lred
+  by induct
+    (iprover dest: listrelp_conj1 listrelp_conj2
+     listrelp_imp_listsp1 listrelp_imp_listsp2 intro: WN.intros
+     NF.intros [simplified listall_listsp_eq])+
+
+lemma lemma6:
+  assumes wn: "WN r"
+  shows "\<exists>r'. r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>l r'" using wn
+proof induct
+  case (Var rs n)
+  then have "\<exists>rs'. rs [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>l] rs'"
+    by induct (iprover intro: listrelp.intros)+
+  then show ?case by (iprover intro: lred.Var)
+qed (iprover intro: lred.intros)+
+
+lemma lemma7:
+  assumes r: "r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s r'"
+  shows "NF r' \<Longrightarrow> r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>l r'" using r
+proof induct
+  case (Var rs rs' x)
+  from `NF (Var x \<degree>\<degree> rs')` have "listall NF rs'"
+    by cases simp_all
+  with Var(1) have "rs [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>l] rs'"
+  proof induct
+    case Nil
+    show ?case by (rule listrelp.Nil)
+  next
+    case (Cons x y xs ys)
+    hence "x \<rightarrow>\<^sub>l y" and "xs [\<rightarrow>\<^sub>l] ys" by simp_all
+    thus ?case by (rule listrelp.Cons)
+  qed
+  thus ?case by (rule lred.Var)
+next
+  case (Abs r r' ss ss')
+  from `NF (Abs r' \<degree>\<degree> ss')`
+  have ss': "ss' = []" by (rule Abs_NF)
+  from Abs(3) have ss: "ss = []" using ss'
+    by cases simp_all
+  from ss' Abs have "NF (Abs r')" by simp
+  hence "NF r'" by cases simp_all
+  with Abs have "r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>l r'" by simp
+  hence "Abs r \<rightarrow>\<^sub>l Abs r'" by (rule lred.Abs)
+  with ss ss' show ?case by simp
+next
+  case (Beta r s ss t)
+  hence "r[s/0] \<degree>\<degree> ss \<rightarrow>\<^sub>l t" by simp
+  thus ?case by (rule lred.Beta)
+qed
+
+lemma WN_eq: "WN t = (\<exists>t'. t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta>\<^sup>* t' \<and> NF t')"
+proof
+  assume "WN t"
+  then have "\<exists>t'. t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>l t'" by (rule lemma6)
+  then obtain t' where t': "t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>l t'" ..
+  then have NF: "NF t'" by (rule lemma5)
+  from t' have "t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s t'" by (rule lred_imp_sred)
+  then have "t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta>\<^sup>* t'" by (rule lemma2_2)
+  with NF show "\<exists>t'. t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta>\<^sup>* t' \<and> NF t'" by iprover
+next
+  assume "\<exists>t'. t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta>\<^sup>* t' \<and> NF t'"
+  then obtain t' where t': "t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>\<beta>\<^sup>* t'" and NF: "NF t'"
+    by iprover
+  from t' have "t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>s t'" by (rule rtrancl_beta_sred)
+  then have "t \<rightarrow>\<^sub>l t'" using NF by (rule lemma7)
+  then show "WN t" by (rule lemma5)
+qed
+
+end