Tue, 03 May 2011 15:07:36 +0200 wenzelm formal Base theory;
Tue, 03 May 2011 14:23:40 +0200 blanchet reintroduce this idea of running "metisFT" after a failed "metis" -- I took it out in e85ce10cef1a because I couldn't think of a reasonable use case, but now that ATPs use sound encodings and include dangerous facts (e.g. True_or_False) it makes more sense than ever to run "metisFT" after "metis"
Tue, 03 May 2011 08:52:32 +0200 blanchet whitespace tuning
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -30 -10 -3 +3 +10 +30 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip