author wenzelm
Wed, 27 Mar 2013 16:38:25 +0100
changeset 51553 63327f679cff
parent 46823 57bf0cecb366
child 58871 c399ae4b836f
permissions -rw-r--r--
more ambitious Goal.skip_proofs: covers Goal.prove forms as well, and do not insist in quick_and_dirty (for the sake of Isabelle/jEdit);

(*  Title:      ZF/Constructible/WF_absolute.thy
    Author:     Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory

header {*Absoluteness of Well-Founded Recursion*}

theory WF_absolute imports WFrec begin

subsection{*Transitive closure without fixedpoints*}

  rtrancl_alt :: "[i,i]=>i" where
    "rtrancl_alt(A,r) ==
       {p \<in> A*A. \<exists>n\<in>nat. \<exists>f \<in> succ(n) -> A.
                 (\<exists>x y. p = <x,y> &  f`0 = x & f`n = y) &
                       (\<forall>i\<in>n. <f`i, f`succ(i)> \<in> r)}"

lemma alt_rtrancl_lemma1 [rule_format]:
    "n \<in> nat
     ==> \<forall>f \<in> succ(n) -> field(r).
         (\<forall>i\<in>n. \<langle>f`i, f ` succ(i)\<rangle> \<in> r) \<longrightarrow> \<langle>f`0, f`n\<rangle> \<in> r^*"
apply (induct_tac n)
apply (simp_all add: apply_funtype rtrancl_refl, clarify)
apply (rename_tac n f)
apply (rule rtrancl_into_rtrancl)
 prefer 2 apply assumption
apply (drule_tac x="restrict(f,succ(n))" in bspec)
 apply (blast intro: restrict_type2)
apply (simp add: Ord_succ_mem_iff nat_0_le [THEN ltD] leI [THEN ltD] ltI)

lemma rtrancl_alt_subset_rtrancl: "rtrancl_alt(field(r),r) \<subseteq> r^*"
apply (simp add: rtrancl_alt_def)
apply (blast intro: alt_rtrancl_lemma1)

lemma rtrancl_subset_rtrancl_alt: "r^* \<subseteq> rtrancl_alt(field(r),r)"
apply (simp add: rtrancl_alt_def, clarify)
apply (frule rtrancl_type [THEN subsetD], clarify, simp)
apply (erule rtrancl_induct)
 txt{*Base case, trivial*}
 apply (rule_tac x=0 in bexI)
  apply (rule_tac x="\<lambda>x\<in>1. xa" in bexI)
   apply simp_all
txt{*Inductive step*}
apply clarify
apply (rename_tac n f)
apply (rule_tac x="succ(n)" in bexI)
 apply (rule_tac x="\<lambda>i\<in>succ(succ(n)). if i=succ(n) then z else f`i" in bexI)
  apply (simp add: Ord_succ_mem_iff nat_0_le [THEN ltD] leI [THEN ltD] ltI)
  apply (blast intro: mem_asym)
 apply typecheck
 apply auto

lemma rtrancl_alt_eq_rtrancl: "rtrancl_alt(field(r),r) = r^*"
by (blast del: subsetI
          intro: rtrancl_alt_subset_rtrancl rtrancl_subset_rtrancl_alt)

  rtran_closure_mem :: "[i=>o,i,i,i] => o" where
    --{*The property of belonging to @{text "rtran_closure(r)"}*}
    "rtran_closure_mem(M,A,r,p) ==
              \<exists>nnat[M]. \<exists>n[M]. \<exists>n'[M]. 
               omega(M,nnat) & n\<in>nnat & successor(M,n,n') &
               (\<exists>f[M]. typed_function(M,n',A,f) &
                (\<exists>x[M]. \<exists>y[M]. \<exists>zero[M]. pair(M,x,y,p) & empty(M,zero) &
                  fun_apply(M,f,zero,x) & fun_apply(M,f,n,y)) &
                  (\<forall>j[M]. j\<in>n \<longrightarrow> 
                    (\<exists>fj[M]. \<exists>sj[M]. \<exists>fsj[M]. \<exists>ffp[M]. 
                      fun_apply(M,f,j,fj) & successor(M,j,sj) &
                      fun_apply(M,f,sj,fsj) & pair(M,fj,fsj,ffp) & ffp \<in> r)))"

  rtran_closure :: "[i=>o,i,i] => o" where
    "rtran_closure(M,r,s) == 
        \<forall>A[M]. is_field(M,r,A) \<longrightarrow>
         (\<forall>p[M]. p \<in> s \<longleftrightarrow> rtran_closure_mem(M,A,r,p))"

  tran_closure :: "[i=>o,i,i] => o" where
    "tran_closure(M,r,t) ==
         \<exists>s[M]. rtran_closure(M,r,s) & composition(M,r,s,t)"

lemma (in M_basic) rtran_closure_mem_iff:
     "[|M(A); M(r); M(p)|]
      ==> rtran_closure_mem(M,A,r,p) \<longleftrightarrow>
          (\<exists>n[M]. n\<in>nat & 
           (\<exists>f[M]. f \<in> succ(n) -> A &
            (\<exists>x[M]. \<exists>y[M]. p = <x,y> & f`0 = x & f`n = y) &
                           (\<forall>i\<in>n. <f`i, f`succ(i)> \<in> r)))"
by (simp add: rtran_closure_mem_def Ord_succ_mem_iff nat_0_le [THEN ltD]) 

locale M_trancl = M_basic +
  assumes rtrancl_separation:
         "[| M(r); M(A) |] ==> separation (M, rtran_closure_mem(M,A,r))"
      and wellfounded_trancl_separation:
         "[| M(r); M(Z) |] ==> 
          separation (M, \<lambda>x. 
              \<exists>w[M]. \<exists>wx[M]. \<exists>rp[M]. 
               w \<in> Z & pair(M,w,x,wx) & tran_closure(M,r,rp) & wx \<in> rp)"

lemma (in M_trancl) rtran_closure_rtrancl:
     "M(r) ==> rtran_closure(M,r,rtrancl(r))"
apply (simp add: rtran_closure_def rtran_closure_mem_iff 
                 rtrancl_alt_eq_rtrancl [symmetric] rtrancl_alt_def)
apply (auto simp add: nat_0_le [THEN ltD] apply_funtype) 

lemma (in M_trancl) rtrancl_closed [intro,simp]:
     "M(r) ==> M(rtrancl(r))"
apply (insert rtrancl_separation [of r "field(r)"])
apply (simp add: rtrancl_alt_eq_rtrancl [symmetric]
                 rtrancl_alt_def rtran_closure_mem_iff)

lemma (in M_trancl) rtrancl_abs [simp]:
     "[| M(r); M(z) |] ==> rtran_closure(M,r,z) \<longleftrightarrow> z = rtrancl(r)"
apply (rule iffI)
 txt{*Proving the right-to-left implication*}
 prefer 2 apply (blast intro: rtran_closure_rtrancl)
apply (rule M_equalityI)
apply (simp add: rtran_closure_def rtrancl_alt_eq_rtrancl [symmetric]
                 rtrancl_alt_def rtran_closure_mem_iff)
apply (auto simp add: nat_0_le [THEN ltD] apply_funtype) 

lemma (in M_trancl) trancl_closed [intro,simp]:
     "M(r) ==> M(trancl(r))"
by (simp add: trancl_def comp_closed rtrancl_closed)

lemma (in M_trancl) trancl_abs [simp]:
     "[| M(r); M(z) |] ==> tran_closure(M,r,z) \<longleftrightarrow> z = trancl(r)"
by (simp add: tran_closure_def trancl_def)

lemma (in M_trancl) wellfounded_trancl_separation':
     "[| M(r); M(Z) |] ==> separation (M, \<lambda>x. \<exists>w[M]. w \<in> Z & <w,x> \<in> r^+)"
by (insert wellfounded_trancl_separation [of r Z], simp) 

text{*Alternative proof of @{text wf_on_trancl}; inspiration for the
      relativized version.  Original version is on theory WF.*}
lemma "[| wf[A](r);  r-``A \<subseteq> A |] ==> wf[A](r^+)"
apply (simp add: wf_on_def wf_def)
apply (safe intro!: equalityI)
apply (drule_tac x = "{x\<in>A. \<exists>w. \<langle>w,x\<rangle> \<in> r^+ & w \<in> Z}" in spec)
apply (blast elim: tranclE)

lemma (in M_trancl) wellfounded_on_trancl:
     "[| wellfounded_on(M,A,r);  r-``A \<subseteq> A; M(r); M(A) |]
      ==> wellfounded_on(M,A,r^+)"
apply (simp add: wellfounded_on_def)
apply (safe intro!: equalityI)
apply (rename_tac Z x)
apply (subgoal_tac "M({x\<in>A. \<exists>w[M]. w \<in> Z & \<langle>w,x\<rangle> \<in> r^+})")
 prefer 2
 apply (blast intro: wellfounded_trancl_separation') 
apply (drule_tac x = "{x\<in>A. \<exists>w[M]. w \<in> Z & \<langle>w,x\<rangle> \<in> r^+}" in rspec, safe)
apply (blast dest: transM, simp)
apply (rename_tac y w)
apply (drule_tac x=w in bspec, assumption, clarify)
apply (erule tranclE)
  apply (blast dest: transM)   (*transM is needed to prove M(xa)*)
 apply blast

lemma (in M_trancl) wellfounded_trancl:
     "[|wellfounded(M,r); M(r)|] ==> wellfounded(M,r^+)"
apply (simp add: wellfounded_iff_wellfounded_on_field)
apply (rule wellfounded_on_subset_A, erule wellfounded_on_trancl)
   apply blast
  apply (simp_all add: trancl_type [THEN field_rel_subset])

text{*Absoluteness for wfrec-defined functions.*}

(*first use is_recfun, then M_is_recfun*)

lemma (in M_trancl) wfrec_relativize:
  "[|wf(r); M(a); M(r);  
     strong_replacement(M, \<lambda>x z. \<exists>y[M]. \<exists>g[M].
          pair(M,x,y,z) & 
          is_recfun(r^+, x, \<lambda>x f. H(x, restrict(f, r -`` {x})), g) & 
          y = H(x, restrict(g, r -`` {x}))); 
     \<forall>x[M]. \<forall>g[M]. function(g) \<longrightarrow> M(H(x,g))|] 
   ==> wfrec(r,a,H) = z \<longleftrightarrow> 
       (\<exists>f[M]. is_recfun(r^+, a, \<lambda>x f. H(x, restrict(f, r -`` {x})), f) & 
            z = H(a,restrict(f,r-``{a})))"
apply (frule wf_trancl) 
apply (simp add: wftrec_def wfrec_def, safe)
 apply (frule wf_exists_is_recfun 
              [of concl: "r^+" a "\<lambda>x f. H(x, restrict(f, r -`` {x}))"]) 
      apply (simp_all add: trans_trancl function_restrictI trancl_subset_times)
 apply (clarify, rule_tac x=x in rexI) 
 apply (simp_all add: the_recfun_eq trans_trancl trancl_subset_times)

text{*Assuming @{term r} is transitive simplifies the occurrences of @{text H}.
      The premise @{term "relation(r)"} is necessary 
      before we can replace @{term "r^+"} by @{term r}. *}
theorem (in M_trancl) trans_wfrec_relativize:
  "[|wf(r);  trans(r);  relation(r);  M(r);  M(a);
     wfrec_replacement(M,MH,r);  relation2(M,MH,H);
     \<forall>x[M]. \<forall>g[M]. function(g) \<longrightarrow> M(H(x,g))|] 
   ==> wfrec(r,a,H) = z \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>f[M]. is_recfun(r,a,H,f) & z = H(a,f))" 
apply (frule wfrec_replacement', assumption+) 
apply (simp cong: is_recfun_cong
           add: wfrec_relativize trancl_eq_r
                is_recfun_restrict_idem domain_restrict_idem)

theorem (in M_trancl) trans_wfrec_abs:
  "[|wf(r);  trans(r);  relation(r);  M(r);  M(a);  M(z);
     wfrec_replacement(M,MH,r);  relation2(M,MH,H);
     \<forall>x[M]. \<forall>g[M]. function(g) \<longrightarrow> M(H(x,g))|] 
   ==> is_wfrec(M,MH,r,a,z) \<longleftrightarrow> z=wfrec(r,a,H)" 
by (simp add: trans_wfrec_relativize [THEN iff_sym] is_wfrec_abs, blast) 

lemma (in M_trancl) trans_eq_pair_wfrec_iff:
  "[|wf(r);  trans(r); relation(r); M(r);  M(y); 
     wfrec_replacement(M,MH,r);  relation2(M,MH,H);
     \<forall>x[M]. \<forall>g[M]. function(g) \<longrightarrow> M(H(x,g))|] 
   ==> y = <x, wfrec(r, x, H)> \<longleftrightarrow> 
       (\<exists>f[M]. is_recfun(r,x,H,f) & y = <x, H(x,f)>)"
apply safe 
 apply (simp add: trans_wfrec_relativize [THEN iff_sym, of concl: _ x]) 
txt{*converse direction*}
apply (rule sym)
apply (simp add: trans_wfrec_relativize, blast) 

subsection{*M is closed under well-founded recursion*}

text{*Lemma with the awkward premise mentioning @{text wfrec}.*}
lemma (in M_trancl) wfrec_closed_lemma [rule_format]:
     "[|wf(r); M(r); 
        strong_replacement(M, \<lambda>x y. y = \<langle>x, wfrec(r, x, H)\<rangle>);
        \<forall>x[M]. \<forall>g[M]. function(g) \<longrightarrow> M(H(x,g)) |] 
      ==> M(a) \<longrightarrow> M(wfrec(r,a,H))"
apply (rule_tac a=a in wf_induct, assumption+)
apply (subst wfrec, assumption, clarify)
apply (drule_tac x1=x and x="\<lambda>x\<in>r -`` {x}. wfrec(r, x, H)" 
       in rspec [THEN rspec]) 
apply (simp_all add: function_lam) 
apply (blast intro: lam_closed dest: pair_components_in_M) 

text{*Eliminates one instance of replacement.*}
lemma (in M_trancl) wfrec_replacement_iff:
     "strong_replacement(M, \<lambda>x z. 
          \<exists>y[M]. pair(M,x,y,z) & (\<exists>g[M]. is_recfun(r,x,H,g) & y = H(x,g))) \<longleftrightarrow>
           \<lambda>x y. \<exists>f[M]. is_recfun(r,x,H,f) & y = <x, H(x,f)>)"
apply simp 
apply (rule strong_replacement_cong, blast) 

text{*Useful version for transitive relations*}
theorem (in M_trancl) trans_wfrec_closed:
     "[|wf(r); trans(r); relation(r); M(r); M(a);
       wfrec_replacement(M,MH,r);  relation2(M,MH,H);
        \<forall>x[M]. \<forall>g[M]. function(g) \<longrightarrow> M(H(x,g)) |] 
      ==> M(wfrec(r,a,H))"
apply (frule wfrec_replacement', assumption+) 
apply (frule wfrec_replacement_iff [THEN iffD1]) 
apply (rule wfrec_closed_lemma, assumption+) 
apply (simp_all add: wfrec_replacement_iff trans_eq_pair_wfrec_iff) 

subsection{*Absoluteness without assuming transitivity*}
lemma (in M_trancl) eq_pair_wfrec_iff:
  "[|wf(r);  M(r);  M(y); 
     strong_replacement(M, \<lambda>x z. \<exists>y[M]. \<exists>g[M].
          pair(M,x,y,z) & 
          is_recfun(r^+, x, \<lambda>x f. H(x, restrict(f, r -`` {x})), g) & 
          y = H(x, restrict(g, r -`` {x}))); 
     \<forall>x[M]. \<forall>g[M]. function(g) \<longrightarrow> M(H(x,g))|] 
   ==> y = <x, wfrec(r, x, H)> \<longleftrightarrow> 
       (\<exists>f[M]. is_recfun(r^+, x, \<lambda>x f. H(x, restrict(f, r -`` {x})), f) & 
            y = <x, H(x,restrict(f,r-``{x}))>)"
apply safe  
 apply (simp add: wfrec_relativize [THEN iff_sym, of concl: _ x]) 
txt{*converse direction*}
apply (rule sym)
apply (simp add: wfrec_relativize, blast) 

text{*Full version not assuming transitivity, but maybe not very useful.*}
theorem (in M_trancl) wfrec_closed:
     "[|wf(r); M(r); M(a);
        relation2(M,MH, \<lambda>x f. H(x, restrict(f, r -`` {x})));
        \<forall>x[M]. \<forall>g[M]. function(g) \<longrightarrow> M(H(x,g)) |] 
      ==> M(wfrec(r,a,H))"
apply (frule wfrec_replacement' 
               [of MH "r^+" "\<lambda>x f. H(x, restrict(f, r -`` {x}))"])
   prefer 4
   apply (frule wfrec_replacement_iff [THEN iffD1]) 
   apply (rule wfrec_closed_lemma, assumption+) 
     apply (simp_all add: eq_pair_wfrec_iff func.function_restrictI)