src/HOL/Prolog/prolog.ML
author wenzelm
Thu, 30 Jul 2009 11:23:57 +0200
changeset 32282 853ef99c04cc
parent 32260 eb97888fa422
child 32283 3bebc195c124
permissions -rw-r--r--
FOCUS_PREMS as full replacement for METAHYPS, where the conclusion may still contain schematic variables;

(*  Title:    HOL/Prolog/prolog.ML
    Author:   David von Oheimb (based on a lecture on Lambda Prolog by Nadathur)
*)

set Proof.show_main_goal;

structure Prolog =
struct

exception not_HOHH;

fun isD t = case t of
    Const("Trueprop",_)$t     => isD t
  | Const("op &"  ,_)$l$r     => isD l andalso isD r
  | Const("op -->",_)$l$r     => isG l andalso isD r
  | Const(   "==>",_)$l$r     => isG l andalso isD r
  | Const("All",_)$Abs(s,_,t) => isD t
  | Const("all",_)$Abs(s,_,t) => isD t
  | Const("op |",_)$_$_       => false
  | Const("Ex" ,_)$_          => false
  | Const("not",_)$_          => false
  | Const("True",_)           => false
  | Const("False",_)          => false
  | l $ r                     => isD l
  | Const _ (* rigid atom *)  => true
  | Bound _ (* rigid atom *)  => true
  | Free  _ (* rigid atom *)  => true
  | _    (* flexible atom,
            anything else *)  => false
and
    isG t = case t of
    Const("Trueprop",_)$t     => isG t
  | Const("op &"  ,_)$l$r     => isG l andalso isG r
  | Const("op |"  ,_)$l$r     => isG l andalso isG r
  | Const("op -->",_)$l$r     => isD l andalso isG r
  | Const(   "==>",_)$l$r     => isD l andalso isG r
  | Const("All",_)$Abs(_,_,t) => isG t
  | Const("all",_)$Abs(_,_,t) => isG t
  | Const("Ex" ,_)$Abs(_,_,t) => isG t
  | Const("True",_)           => true
  | Const("not",_)$_          => false
  | Const("False",_)          => false
  | _ (* atom *)              => true;

val check_HOHH_tac1 = PRIMITIVE (fn thm =>
        if isG (concl_of thm) then thm else raise not_HOHH);
val check_HOHH_tac2 = PRIMITIVE (fn thm =>
        if forall isG (prems_of thm) then thm else raise not_HOHH);
fun check_HOHH thm  = (if isD (concl_of thm) andalso forall isG (prems_of thm)
                        then thm else raise not_HOHH);

fun atomizeD ctxt thm = let
    fun at  thm = case concl_of thm of
      _$(Const("All" ,_)$Abs(s,_,_))=> at(thm RS
        (read_instantiate ctxt [(("x", 0), "?" ^ (if s="P" then "PP" else s))] spec))
    | _$(Const("op &",_)$_$_)       => at(thm RS conjunct1)@at(thm RS conjunct2)
    | _$(Const("op -->",_)$_$_)     => at(thm RS mp)
    | _                             => [thm]
in map zero_var_indexes (at thm) end;

val atomize_ss =
  Simplifier.theory_context @{theory} empty_ss
  setmksimps (mksimps mksimps_pairs)
  addsimps [
        all_conj_distrib, (* "(! x. P x & Q x) = ((! x. P x) & (! x. Q x))" *)
        imp_conjL RS sym, (* "(D :- G1 :- G2) = (D :- G1 & G2)" *)
        imp_conjR,        (* "(D1 & D2 :- G) = ((D1 :- G) & (D2 :- G))" *)
        imp_all];         (* "((!x. D) :- G) = (!x. D :- G)" *)

(*val hyp_resolve_tac = FOCUS_PREMS (fn {prems, ...} =>
                                  resolve_tac (maps atomizeD prems) 1);
  -- is nice, but cannot instantiate unknowns in the assumptions *)
fun hyp_resolve_tac i st = let
        fun ap (Const("All",_)$Abs(_,_,t))=(case ap t of (k,a,t) => (k+1,a  ,t))
        |   ap (Const("op -->",_)$_$t)    =(case ap t of (k,_,t) => (k,true ,t))
        |   ap t                          =                         (0,false,t);
(*
        fun rep_goal (Const ("all",_)$Abs (_,_,t)) = rep_goal t
        |   rep_goal (Const ("==>",_)$s$t)         =
                        (case rep_goal t of (l,t) => (s::l,t))
        |   rep_goal t                             = ([]  ,t);
        val (prems, Const("Trueprop", _)$concl) = rep_goal
                                                (#3(dest_state (st,i)));
*)
        val subgoal = #3(dest_state (st,i));
        val prems = Logic.strip_assums_hyp subgoal;
        val concl = HOLogic.dest_Trueprop (Logic.strip_assums_concl subgoal);
        fun drot_tac k i = DETERM (rotate_tac k i);
        fun spec_tac 0 i = all_tac
        |   spec_tac k i = EVERY' [dtac spec, drot_tac ~1, spec_tac (k-1)] i;
        fun dup_spec_tac k i = if k = 0 then all_tac else EVERY'
                      [DETERM o (etac all_dupE), drot_tac ~2, spec_tac (k-1)] i;
        fun same_head _ (Const (x,_)) (Const (y,_)) = x = y
        |   same_head k (s$_)         (t$_)         = same_head k s t
        |   same_head k (Bound i)     (Bound j)     = i = j + k
        |   same_head _ _             _             = true;
        fun mapn f n []      = []
        |   mapn f n (x::xs) = f n x::mapn f (n+1) xs;
        fun pres_tac (k,arrow,t) n i = drot_tac n i THEN (
                if same_head k t concl
                then dup_spec_tac k i THEN
                     (if arrow then etac mp i THEN drot_tac (~n) i else atac i)
                else no_tac);
        val ptacs = mapn (fn n => fn t =>
                          pres_tac (ap (HOLogic.dest_Trueprop t)) n i) 0 prems;
        in Library.foldl (op APPEND) (no_tac, ptacs) st end;

fun ptac ctxt prog = let
  val proga = List.concat (map (atomizeD ctxt) prog)                   (* atomize the prog *)
  in    (REPEAT_DETERM1 o FIRST' [
                rtac TrueI,                     (* "True" *)
                rtac conjI,                     (* "[| P; Q |] ==> P & Q" *)
                rtac allI,                      (* "(!!x. P x) ==> ! x. P x" *)
                rtac exI,                       (* "P x ==> ? x. P x" *)
                rtac impI THEN'                 (* "(P ==> Q) ==> P --> Q" *)
                  asm_full_simp_tac atomize_ss THEN'    (* atomize the asms *)
                  (REPEAT_DETERM o (etac conjE))        (* split the asms *)
                ])
        ORELSE' resolve_tac [disjI1,disjI2]     (* "P ==> P | Q","Q ==> P | Q"*)
        ORELSE' ((resolve_tac proga APPEND' hyp_resolve_tac)
                 THEN' (fn _ => check_HOHH_tac2))
end;

fun prolog_tac ctxt prog =
  check_HOHH_tac1 THEN
  DEPTH_SOLVE (ptac ctxt (map check_HOHH prog) 1);

val prog_HOHH = [];

end;