Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:48:08 +0200 renamed Local_Theory.theory(_result) to Local_Theory.background_theory(_result) to emphasize that this belongs to the infrastructure and is rarely appropriate in user-space tools;
wenzelm [Thu, 26 Aug 2010 15:48:08 +0200] rev 38757
renamed Local_Theory.theory(_result) to Local_Theory.background_theory(_result) to emphasize that this belongs to the infrastructure and is rarely appropriate in user-space tools;
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:09:12 +0200 renamed ProofContext.theory(_result) to ProofContext.background_theory(_result) to emphasize that this belongs to the infrastructure and is rarely appropriate in user-space tools;
wenzelm [Thu, 26 Aug 2010 13:09:12 +0200] rev 38756
renamed ProofContext.theory(_result) to ProofContext.background_theory(_result) to emphasize that this belongs to the infrastructure and is rarely appropriate in user-space tools;
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:06:00 +0200 standardized Context.copy_thy to Theory.copy alias, with slightly more direct way of using it;
wenzelm [Thu, 26 Aug 2010 12:06:00 +0200] rev 38755
standardized Context.copy_thy to Theory.copy alias, with slightly more direct way of using it;
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:33:36 +0200 merged
wenzelm [Thu, 26 Aug 2010 11:33:36 +0200] rev 38754
merged
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:42:22 +0200 merged
blanchet [Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:42:22 +0200] rev 38753
merged
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:42:06 +0200 consider "locality" when assigning weights to facts
blanchet [Thu, 26 Aug 2010 10:42:06 +0200] rev 38752
consider "locality" when assigning weights to facts
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:23:21 +0200 add a bonus for chained facts, since they are likely to be relevant;
blanchet [Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:23:21 +0200] rev 38751
add a bonus for chained facts, since they are likely to be relevant; (especially in a Mirabelle run!) -- chained facts used to be included forcibly, then were treated as any other fact; the current approach seems more flexible
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:03:18 +0200 merged
blanchet [Thu, 26 Aug 2010 09:03:18 +0200] rev 38750
merged
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:03:08 +0200 add a penalty for lambda-abstractions;
blanchet [Thu, 26 Aug 2010 01:03:08 +0200] rev 38749
add a penalty for lambda-abstractions; the penalty will kick in only when the goal contains no lambdas, in which case Sledgehammer previously totally disallowed any higher-order construct; this was too drastic; lambdas are dangerous because they rapidly lead to unsound proofs; e.g. COMBI_def COMBS_def not_Cons_self2 with explicit_apply
Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:49:38 +0200 renaming
blanchet [Thu, 26 Aug 2010 00:49:38 +0200] rev 38748
renaming
(0) -30000 -10000 -3000 -1000 -300 -100 -10 +10 +100 +300 +1000 +3000 +10000 +30000 tip