doc-src/TutorialI/Recdef/document/termination.tex
author wenzelm
Thu, 17 Aug 2000 16:23:50 +0200
changeset 9638 1f62547edc0e
parent 9541 d17c0b34d5c8
child 9674 f789d2490669
permissions -rw-r--r--
removed Lambda/Type.ML;
Ignore whitespace changes - Everywhere: Within whitespace: At end of lines:
8749
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
     1
\begin{isabelle}%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
     2
%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
     3
\begin{isamarkuptext}%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
     4
When a function is defined via \isacommand{recdef}, Isabelle tries to prove
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
     5
its termination with the help of the user-supplied measure.  All of the above
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
     6
examples are simple enough that Isabelle can prove automatically that the
8771
026f37a86ea7 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 8749
diff changeset
     7
measure of the argument goes down in each recursive call. As a result,
026f37a86ea7 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 8749
diff changeset
     8
\isa{$f$.simps} will contain the defining equations (or variants derived from
8749
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
     9
them) as theorems. For example, look (via \isacommand{thm}) at
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    10
\isa{sep.simps} and \isa{sep1.simps} to see that they define the same
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    11
function. What is more, those equations are automatically declared as
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    12
simplification rules.
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    13
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    14
In general, Isabelle may not be able to prove all termination condition
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    15
(there is one for each recursive call) automatically. For example,
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    16
termination of the following artificial function%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    17
\end{isamarkuptext}%
9541
d17c0b34d5c8 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 9458
diff changeset
    18
\isacommand{consts}\ f\ ::\ {"}nat*nat\ {\isasymRightarrow}\ nat{"}\isanewline
d17c0b34d5c8 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 9458
diff changeset
    19
\isacommand{recdef}\ f\ {"}measure({\isasymlambda}(x,y).\ x-y){"}\isanewline
d17c0b34d5c8 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 9458
diff changeset
    20
\ \ {"}f(x,y)\ =\ (if\ x\ {\isasymle}\ y\ then\ x\ else\ f(x,y+1)){"}%
8749
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    21
\begin{isamarkuptext}%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    22
\noindent
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    23
is not proved automatically (although maybe it should be). Isabelle prints a
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    24
kind of error message showing you what it was unable to prove. You will then
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    25
have to prove it as a separate lemma before you attempt the definition
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    26
of your function once more. In our case the required lemma is the obvious one:%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    27
\end{isamarkuptext}%
9541
d17c0b34d5c8 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 9458
diff changeset
    28
\isacommand{lemma}\ termi\_lem[simp]:\ {"}{\isasymnot}\ x\ {\isasymle}\ y\ {\isasymLongrightarrow}\ x\ -\ Suc\ y\ <\ x\ -\ y{"}%
8749
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    29
\begin{isamarkuptxt}%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    30
\noindent
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    31
It was not proved automatically because of the special nature of \isa{-}
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    32
on \isa{nat}. This requires more arithmetic than is tried by default:%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    33
\end{isamarkuptxt}%
9458
c613cd06d5cf apply. -> by
nipkow
parents: 9145
diff changeset
    34
\isacommand{by}(arith)%
8749
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    35
\begin{isamarkuptext}%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    36
\noindent
8771
026f37a86ea7 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 8749
diff changeset
    37
Because \isacommand{recdef}'s termination prover involves simplification,
026f37a86ea7 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 8749
diff changeset
    38
we have turned our lemma into a simplification rule. Therefore our second
8749
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    39
attempt to define our function will automatically take it into account:%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    40
\end{isamarkuptext}%
9541
d17c0b34d5c8 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 9458
diff changeset
    41
\isacommand{consts}\ g\ ::\ {"}nat*nat\ {\isasymRightarrow}\ nat{"}\isanewline
d17c0b34d5c8 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 9458
diff changeset
    42
\isacommand{recdef}\ g\ {"}measure({\isasymlambda}(x,y).\ x-y){"}\isanewline
d17c0b34d5c8 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 9458
diff changeset
    43
\ \ {"}g(x,y)\ =\ (if\ x\ {\isasymle}\ y\ then\ x\ else\ g(x,y+1)){"}%
8749
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    44
\begin{isamarkuptext}%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    45
\noindent
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    46
This time everything works fine. Now \isa{g.simps} contains precisely the
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    47
stated recursion equation for \isa{g} and they are simplification
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    48
rules. Thus we can automatically prove%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    49
\end{isamarkuptext}%
9541
d17c0b34d5c8 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 9458
diff changeset
    50
\isacommand{theorem}\ wow:\ {"}g(1,0)\ =\ g(1,1){"}\isanewline
9458
c613cd06d5cf apply. -> by
nipkow
parents: 9145
diff changeset
    51
\isacommand{by}(simp)%
8749
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    52
\begin{isamarkuptext}%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    53
\noindent
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    54
More exciting theorems require induction, which is discussed below.
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    55
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    56
Because lemma \isa{termi_lem} above was only turned into a
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    57
simplification rule for the sake of the termination proof, we may want to
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    58
disable it again:%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    59
\end{isamarkuptext}%
9541
d17c0b34d5c8 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 9458
diff changeset
    60
\isacommand{lemmas}\ [simp\ del]\ =\ termi\_lem%
8749
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    61
\begin{isamarkuptext}%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    62
The attentive reader may wonder why we chose to call our function \isa{g}
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    63
rather than \isa{f} the second time around. The reason is that, despite
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    64
the failed termination proof, the definition of \isa{f} did not
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    65
fail (and thus we could not define it a second time). However, all theorems
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    66
about \isa{f}, for example \isa{f.simps}, carry as a precondition the
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    67
unproved termination condition. Moreover, the theorems \isa{f.simps} are
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    68
not simplification rules. However, this mechanism allows a delayed proof of
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    69
termination: instead of proving \isa{termi_lem} up front, we could prove
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    70
it later on and then use it to remove the preconditions from the theorems
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    71
about \isa{f}. In most cases this is more cumbersome than proving things
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    72
up front
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    73
%FIXME, with one exception: nested recursion.
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    74
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    75
Although all the above examples employ measure functions, \isacommand{recdef}
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    76
allows arbitrary wellfounded relations. For example, termination of
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    77
Ackermann's function requires the lexicographic product \isa{<*lex*>}:%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    78
\end{isamarkuptext}%
9541
d17c0b34d5c8 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 9458
diff changeset
    79
\isacommand{consts}\ ack\ ::\ {"}nat*nat\ {\isasymRightarrow}\ nat{"}\isanewline
d17c0b34d5c8 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 9458
diff changeset
    80
\isacommand{recdef}\ ack\ {"}measure(\%m.\ m)\ <*lex*>\ measure(\%n.\ n){"}\isanewline
d17c0b34d5c8 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 9458
diff changeset
    81
\ \ {"}ack(0,n)\ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ \ =\ Suc\ n{"}\isanewline
d17c0b34d5c8 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 9458
diff changeset
    82
\ \ {"}ack(Suc\ m,0)\ \ \ \ \ =\ ack(m,\ 1){"}\isanewline
d17c0b34d5c8 *** empty log message ***
nipkow
parents: 9458
diff changeset
    83
\ \ {"}ack(Suc\ m,Suc\ n)\ =\ ack(m,ack(Suc\ m,n)){"}%
8749
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    84
\begin{isamarkuptext}%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    85
\noindent
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    86
For details see the manual~\cite{isabelle-HOL} and the examples in the
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    87
library.%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    88
\end{isamarkuptext}%
2665170f104a Adding generated files
nipkow
parents:
diff changeset
    89
\end{isabelle}%
9145
9f7b8de5bfaf updated;
wenzelm
parents: 8771
diff changeset
    90
%%% Local Variables:
9f7b8de5bfaf updated;
wenzelm
parents: 8771
diff changeset
    91
%%% mode: latex
9f7b8de5bfaf updated;
wenzelm
parents: 8771
diff changeset
    92
%%% TeX-master: "root"
9f7b8de5bfaf updated;
wenzelm
parents: 8771
diff changeset
    93
%%% End: