| author | paulson | 
| Mon, 01 Dec 1997 12:52:18 +0100 | |
| changeset 4331 | 34bb65b037dd | 
| parent 4091 | 771b1f6422a8 | 
| child 4512 | 572440df6aa7 | 
| permissions | -rw-r--r-- | 
| 1461 | 1  | 
(* Title: ZF/func  | 
| 0 | 2  | 
ID: $Id$  | 
| 1461 | 3  | 
Author: Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory  | 
| 0 | 4  | 
Copyright 1991 University of Cambridge  | 
5  | 
||
6  | 
Functions in Zermelo-Fraenkel Set Theory  | 
|
7  | 
*)  | 
|
8  | 
||
9  | 
(*** The Pi operator -- dependent function space ***)  | 
|
10  | 
||
| 2877 | 11  | 
goalw ZF.thy [Pi_def]  | 
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
12  | 
"f: Pi(A,B) <-> function(f) & f<=Sigma(A,B) & A<=domain(f)";  | 
| 2877 | 13  | 
by (Blast_tac 1);  | 
| 760 | 14  | 
qed "Pi_iff";  | 
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
15  | 
|
| 
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
16  | 
(*For upward compatibility with the former definition*)  | 
| 2877 | 17  | 
goalw ZF.thy [Pi_def, function_def]  | 
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
18  | 
"f: Pi(A,B) <-> f<=Sigma(A,B) & (ALL x:A. EX! y. <x,y>: f)";  | 
| 2877 | 19  | 
by (Blast_tac 1);  | 
| 760 | 20  | 
qed "Pi_iff_old";  | 
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
21  | 
|
| 2877 | 22  | 
goal ZF.thy "!!f. f: Pi(A,B) ==> function(f)";  | 
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
23  | 
by (asm_full_simp_tac (FOL_ss addsimps [Pi_iff]) 1);  | 
| 760 | 24  | 
qed "fun_is_function";  | 
| 0 | 25  | 
|
26  | 
(**Two "destruct" rules for Pi **)  | 
|
27  | 
||
| 2877 | 28  | 
val [major] = goalw ZF.thy [Pi_def] "f: Pi(A,B) ==> f <= Sigma(A,B)";  | 
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
29  | 
by (rtac (major RS CollectD1 RS PowD) 1);  | 
| 760 | 30  | 
qed "fun_is_rel";  | 
| 0 | 31  | 
|
| 2877 | 32  | 
goal ZF.thy "!!f. [| f: Pi(A,B); a:A |] ==> EX! y. <a,y>: f";  | 
| 4091 | 33  | 
by (blast_tac (claset() addSDs [Pi_iff_old RS iffD1]) 1);  | 
| 760 | 34  | 
qed "fun_unique_Pair";  | 
| 0 | 35  | 
|
| 2877 | 36  | 
val prems = goalw ZF.thy [Pi_def]  | 
| 0 | 37  | 
"[| A=A'; !!x. x:A' ==> B(x)=B'(x) |] ==> Pi(A,B) = Pi(A',B')";  | 
| 
6
 
8ce8c4d13d4d
Installation of new simplifier for ZF.  Deleted all congruence rules not
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
38  | 
by (simp_tac (FOL_ss addsimps prems addcongs [Sigma_cong]) 1);  | 
| 760 | 39  | 
qed "Pi_cong";  | 
| 0 | 40  | 
|
| 2469 | 41  | 
(*Sigma_cong, Pi_cong NOT given to Addcongs: they cause  | 
42  | 
flex-flex pairs and the "Check your prover" error. Most  | 
|
43  | 
Sigmas and Pis are abbreviated as * or -> *)  | 
|
44  | 
||
| 485 | 45  | 
(*Weakening one function type to another; see also Pi_type*)  | 
| 2877 | 46  | 
goalw ZF.thy [Pi_def] "!!f. [| f: A->B; B<=D |] ==> f: A->D";  | 
| 2469 | 47  | 
by (Best_tac 1);  | 
| 760 | 48  | 
qed "fun_weaken_type";  | 
| 0 | 49  | 
|
50  | 
(*Empty function spaces*)  | 
|
| 2877 | 51  | 
goalw ZF.thy [Pi_def, function_def] "Pi(0,A) = {0}";
 | 
52  | 
by (Blast_tac 1);  | 
|
| 760 | 53  | 
qed "Pi_empty1";  | 
| 0 | 54  | 
|
| 2877 | 55  | 
goalw ZF.thy [Pi_def] "!!A a. a:A ==> A->0 = 0";  | 
56  | 
by (Blast_tac 1);  | 
|
| 760 | 57  | 
qed "Pi_empty2";  | 
| 0 | 58  | 
|
| 519 | 59  | 
(*The empty function*)  | 
| 2877 | 60  | 
goalw ZF.thy [Pi_def, function_def] "0: Pi(0,B)";  | 
61  | 
by (Blast_tac 1);  | 
|
| 760 | 62  | 
qed "empty_fun";  | 
| 519 | 63  | 
|
64  | 
(*The singleton function*)  | 
|
| 2877 | 65  | 
goalw ZF.thy [Pi_def, function_def] "{<a,b>} : {a} -> {b}";
 | 
66  | 
by (Blast_tac 1);  | 
|
| 857 | 67  | 
qed "singleton_fun";  | 
| 519 | 68  | 
|
| 2469 | 69  | 
Addsimps [empty_fun, singleton_fun];  | 
70  | 
||
| 0 | 71  | 
(*** Function Application ***)  | 
72  | 
||
| 2877 | 73  | 
goalw ZF.thy [Pi_def, function_def]  | 
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
74  | 
"!!a b f. [| <a,b>: f; <a,c>: f; f: Pi(A,B) |] ==> b=c";  | 
| 2877 | 75  | 
by (Blast_tac 1);  | 
| 760 | 76  | 
qed "apply_equality2";  | 
| 0 | 77  | 
|
| 2877 | 78  | 
goalw ZF.thy [apply_def] "!!a b f. [| <a,b>: f; f: Pi(A,B) |] ==> f`a = b";  | 
| 0 | 79  | 
by (rtac the_equality 1);  | 
80  | 
by (rtac apply_equality2 2);  | 
|
81  | 
by (REPEAT (assume_tac 1));  | 
|
| 760 | 82  | 
qed "apply_equality";  | 
| 0 | 83  | 
|
| 517 | 84  | 
(*Applying a function outside its domain yields 0*)  | 
| 2877 | 85  | 
goalw ZF.thy [apply_def]  | 
| 517 | 86  | 
"!!a b f. [| a ~: domain(f); f: Pi(A,B) |] ==> f`a = 0";  | 
87  | 
by (rtac the_0 1);  | 
|
| 2877 | 88  | 
by (Blast_tac 1);  | 
| 760 | 89  | 
qed "apply_0";  | 
| 517 | 90  | 
|
| 2877 | 91  | 
goal ZF.thy "!!f. [| f: Pi(A,B); c: f |] ==> EX x:A. c = <x,f`x>";  | 
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
92  | 
by (forward_tac [fun_is_rel] 1);  | 
| 4091 | 93  | 
by (blast_tac (claset() addDs [apply_equality]) 1);  | 
| 760 | 94  | 
qed "Pi_memberD";  | 
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
95  | 
|
| 2877 | 96  | 
goal ZF.thy "!!f. [| f: Pi(A,B); a:A |] ==> <a,f`a>: f";  | 
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
97  | 
by (rtac (fun_unique_Pair RS ex1E) 1);  | 
| 
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
98  | 
by (resolve_tac [apply_equality RS ssubst] 3);  | 
| 
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
99  | 
by (REPEAT (assume_tac 1));  | 
| 760 | 100  | 
qed "apply_Pair";  | 
| 0 | 101  | 
|
| 
6
 
8ce8c4d13d4d
Installation of new simplifier for ZF.  Deleted all congruence rules not
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
102  | 
(*Conclusion is flexible -- use res_inst_tac or else apply_funtype below!*)  | 
| 2877 | 103  | 
goal ZF.thy "!!f. [| f: Pi(A,B); a:A |] ==> f`a : B(a)";  | 
| 0 | 104  | 
by (rtac (fun_is_rel RS subsetD RS SigmaE2) 1);  | 
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
105  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac [apply_Pair] 1));  | 
| 760 | 106  | 
qed "apply_type";  | 
| 0 | 107  | 
|
| 
6
 
8ce8c4d13d4d
Installation of new simplifier for ZF.  Deleted all congruence rules not
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
108  | 
(*This version is acceptable to the simplifier*)  | 
| 2877 | 109  | 
goal ZF.thy "!!f. [| f: A->B; a:A |] ==> f`a : B";  | 
| 
6
 
8ce8c4d13d4d
Installation of new simplifier for ZF.  Deleted all congruence rules not
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
110  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac [apply_type] 1));  | 
| 760 | 111  | 
qed "apply_funtype";  | 
| 
6
 
8ce8c4d13d4d
Installation of new simplifier for ZF.  Deleted all congruence rules not
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
112  | 
|
| 2877 | 113  | 
val [major] = goal ZF.thy  | 
| 0 | 114  | 
"f: Pi(A,B) ==> <a,b>: f <-> a:A & f`a = b";  | 
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
115  | 
by (cut_facts_tac [major RS fun_is_rel] 1);  | 
| 4091 | 116  | 
by (blast_tac (claset() addSIs [major RS apply_Pair,  | 
| 2835 | 117  | 
major RSN (2,apply_equality)]) 1);  | 
| 760 | 118  | 
qed "apply_iff";  | 
| 0 | 119  | 
|
120  | 
(*Refining one Pi type to another*)  | 
|
| 2877 | 121  | 
val pi_prem::prems = goal ZF.thy  | 
| 0 | 122  | 
"[| f: Pi(A,C); !!x. x:A ==> f`x : B(x) |] ==> f : Pi(A,B)";  | 
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
123  | 
by (cut_facts_tac [pi_prem] 1);  | 
| 
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
124  | 
by (asm_full_simp_tac (FOL_ss addsimps [Pi_iff]) 1);  | 
| 4091 | 125  | 
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs prems addSDs [pi_prem RS Pi_memberD]) 1);  | 
| 760 | 126  | 
qed "Pi_type";  | 
| 0 | 127  | 
|
128  | 
||
129  | 
(** Elimination of membership in a function **)  | 
|
130  | 
||
| 2877 | 131  | 
goal ZF.thy "!!a A. [| <a,b> : f; f: Pi(A,B) |] ==> a : A";  | 
| 0 | 132  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac [fun_is_rel RS subsetD RS SigmaD1] 1));  | 
| 760 | 133  | 
qed "domain_type";  | 
| 0 | 134  | 
|
| 2877 | 135  | 
goal ZF.thy "!!b B a. [| <a,b> : f; f: Pi(A,B) |] ==> b : B(a)";  | 
| 0 | 136  | 
by (etac (fun_is_rel RS subsetD RS SigmaD2) 1);  | 
137  | 
by (assume_tac 1);  | 
|
| 760 | 138  | 
qed "range_type";  | 
| 0 | 139  | 
|
| 2877 | 140  | 
val prems = goal ZF.thy  | 
| 0 | 141  | 
"[| <a,b>: f; f: Pi(A,B); \  | 
142  | 
\ [| a:A; b:B(a); f`a = b |] ==> P \  | 
|
143  | 
\ |] ==> P";  | 
|
144  | 
by (cut_facts_tac prems 1);  | 
|
145  | 
by (resolve_tac prems 1);  | 
|
146  | 
by (REPEAT (eresolve_tac [asm_rl,domain_type,range_type,apply_equality] 1));  | 
|
| 760 | 147  | 
qed "Pair_mem_PiE";  | 
| 0 | 148  | 
|
149  | 
(*** Lambda Abstraction ***)  | 
|
150  | 
||
| 2877 | 151  | 
goalw ZF.thy [lam_def] "!!A b. a:A ==> <a,b(a)> : (lam x:A. b(x))";  | 
| 0 | 152  | 
by (etac RepFunI 1);  | 
| 760 | 153  | 
qed "lamI";  | 
| 0 | 154  | 
|
| 2877 | 155  | 
val major::prems = goalw ZF.thy [lam_def]  | 
| 0 | 156  | 
"[| p: (lam x:A. b(x)); !!x.[| x:A; p=<x,b(x)> |] ==> P \  | 
157  | 
\ |] ==> P";  | 
|
158  | 
by (rtac (major RS RepFunE) 1);  | 
|
159  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac prems 1));  | 
|
| 760 | 160  | 
qed "lamE";  | 
| 0 | 161  | 
|
| 2877 | 162  | 
goal ZF.thy "!!a b c. [| <a,c>: (lam x:A. b(x)) |] ==> c = b(a)";  | 
| 0 | 163  | 
by (REPEAT (eresolve_tac [asm_rl,lamE,Pair_inject,ssubst] 1));  | 
| 760 | 164  | 
qed "lamD";  | 
| 0 | 165  | 
|
| 2877 | 166  | 
val prems = goalw ZF.thy [lam_def, Pi_def, function_def]  | 
| 3840 | 167  | 
"[| !!x. x:A ==> b(x): B(x) |] ==> (lam x:A. b(x)) : Pi(A,B)";  | 
| 4091 | 168  | 
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs prems) 1);  | 
| 760 | 169  | 
qed "lam_type";  | 
| 0 | 170  | 
|
| 3840 | 171  | 
goal ZF.thy "(lam x:A. b(x)) : A -> {b(x). x:A}";
 | 
| 0 | 172  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac [refl,lam_type,RepFunI] 1));  | 
| 760 | 173  | 
qed "lam_funtype";  | 
| 0 | 174  | 
|
| 3840 | 175  | 
goal ZF.thy "!!a A. a : A ==> (lam x:A. b(x)) ` a = b(a)";  | 
| 0 | 176  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac [apply_equality,lam_funtype,lamI] 1));  | 
| 760 | 177  | 
qed "beta";  | 
| 0 | 178  | 
|
| 2877 | 179  | 
goalw ZF.thy [lam_def] "(lam x:0. b(x)) = 0";  | 
| 2469 | 180  | 
by (Simp_tac 1);  | 
181  | 
qed "lam_empty";  | 
|
182  | 
||
183  | 
Addsimps [beta, lam_empty];  | 
|
184  | 
||
| 0 | 185  | 
(*congruence rule for lambda abstraction*)  | 
| 2877 | 186  | 
val prems = goalw ZF.thy [lam_def]  | 
| 
6
 
8ce8c4d13d4d
Installation of new simplifier for ZF.  Deleted all congruence rules not
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
187  | 
"[| A=A'; !!x. x:A' ==> b(x)=b'(x) |] ==> Lambda(A,b) = Lambda(A',b')";  | 
| 
 
8ce8c4d13d4d
Installation of new simplifier for ZF.  Deleted all congruence rules not
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
188  | 
by (simp_tac (FOL_ss addsimps prems addcongs [RepFun_cong]) 1);  | 
| 760 | 189  | 
qed "lam_cong";  | 
| 0 | 190  | 
|
| 2469 | 191  | 
Addcongs [lam_cong];  | 
192  | 
||
| 2877 | 193  | 
val [major] = goal ZF.thy  | 
| 0 | 194  | 
"(!!x. x:A ==> EX! y. Q(x,y)) ==> EX f. ALL x:A. Q(x, f`x)";  | 
195  | 
by (res_inst_tac [("x", "lam x: A. THE y. Q(x,y)")] exI 1);
 | 
|
196  | 
by (rtac ballI 1);  | 
|
| 2033 | 197  | 
by (stac beta 1);  | 
| 0 | 198  | 
by (assume_tac 1);  | 
199  | 
by (etac (major RS theI) 1);  | 
|
| 760 | 200  | 
qed "lam_theI";  | 
| 0 | 201  | 
|
202  | 
||
203  | 
(** Extensionality **)  | 
|
204  | 
||
205  | 
(*Semi-extensionality!*)  | 
|
| 2877 | 206  | 
val prems = goal ZF.thy  | 
| 0 | 207  | 
"[| f : Pi(A,B); g: Pi(C,D); A<=C; \  | 
208  | 
\ !!x. x:A ==> f`x = g`x |] ==> f<=g";  | 
|
209  | 
by (rtac subsetI 1);  | 
|
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
210  | 
by (eresolve_tac (prems RL [Pi_memberD RS bexE]) 1);  | 
| 0 | 211  | 
by (etac ssubst 1);  | 
212  | 
by (resolve_tac (prems RL [ssubst]) 1);  | 
|
213  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac (prems@[apply_Pair,subsetD]) 1));  | 
|
| 760 | 214  | 
qed "fun_subset";  | 
| 0 | 215  | 
|
| 2877 | 216  | 
val prems = goal ZF.thy  | 
| 0 | 217  | 
"[| f : Pi(A,B); g: Pi(A,D); \  | 
218  | 
\ !!x. x:A ==> f`x = g`x |] ==> f=g";  | 
|
219  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac (prems @ (prems RL [sym]) @  | 
|
| 1461 | 220  | 
[subset_refl,equalityI,fun_subset]) 1));  | 
| 760 | 221  | 
qed "fun_extension";  | 
| 0 | 222  | 
|
| 2877 | 223  | 
goal ZF.thy "!!f A B. f : Pi(A,B) ==> (lam x:A. f`x) = f";  | 
| 0 | 224  | 
by (rtac fun_extension 1);  | 
225  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac [lam_type,apply_type,beta] 1));  | 
|
| 760 | 226  | 
qed "eta";  | 
| 0 | 227  | 
|
| 2469 | 228  | 
Addsimps [eta];  | 
229  | 
||
| 0 | 230  | 
(*Every element of Pi(A,B) may be expressed as a lambda abstraction!*)  | 
| 2877 | 231  | 
val prems = goal ZF.thy  | 
| 0 | 232  | 
"[| f: Pi(A,B); \  | 
| 3840 | 233  | 
\ !!b. [| ALL x:A. b(x):B(x); f = (lam x:A. b(x)) |] ==> P \  | 
| 0 | 234  | 
\ |] ==> P";  | 
235  | 
by (resolve_tac prems 1);  | 
|
236  | 
by (rtac (eta RS sym) 2);  | 
|
237  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac (prems@[ballI,apply_type]) 1));  | 
|
| 760 | 238  | 
qed "Pi_lamE";  | 
| 0 | 239  | 
|
240  | 
||
| 435 | 241  | 
(** Images of functions **)  | 
242  | 
||
| 3840 | 243  | 
goalw ZF.thy [lam_def] "!!C A. C <= A ==> (lam x:A. b(x)) `` C = {b(x). x:C}";
 | 
| 2877 | 244  | 
by (Blast_tac 1);  | 
| 760 | 245  | 
qed "image_lam";  | 
| 435 | 246  | 
|
| 2877 | 247  | 
goal ZF.thy "!!C A. [| f : Pi(A,B);  C <= A |] ==> f``C = {f`x. x:C}";
 | 
| 437 | 248  | 
by (etac (eta RS subst) 1);  | 
| 435 | 249  | 
by (asm_full_simp_tac (FOL_ss addsimps [beta, image_lam, subset_iff]  | 
250  | 
addcongs [RepFun_cong]) 1);  | 
|
| 760 | 251  | 
qed "image_fun";  | 
| 435 | 252  | 
|
253  | 
||
| 0 | 254  | 
(*** properties of "restrict" ***)  | 
255  | 
||
| 2877 | 256  | 
goalw ZF.thy [restrict_def,lam_def]  | 
| 0 | 257  | 
"!!f A. [| f: Pi(C,B); A<=C |] ==> restrict(f,A) <= f";  | 
| 4091 | 258  | 
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [apply_Pair]) 1);  | 
| 760 | 259  | 
qed "restrict_subset";  | 
| 0 | 260  | 
|
| 2877 | 261  | 
val prems = goalw ZF.thy [restrict_def]  | 
| 0 | 262  | 
"[| !!x. x:A ==> f`x: B(x) |] ==> restrict(f,A) : Pi(A,B)";  | 
263  | 
by (rtac lam_type 1);  | 
|
264  | 
by (eresolve_tac prems 1);  | 
|
| 760 | 265  | 
qed "restrict_type";  | 
| 0 | 266  | 
|
| 2877 | 267  | 
val [pi,subs] = goal ZF.thy  | 
| 0 | 268  | 
"[| f: Pi(C,B); A<=C |] ==> restrict(f,A) : Pi(A,B)";  | 
269  | 
by (rtac (pi RS apply_type RS restrict_type) 1);  | 
|
270  | 
by (etac (subs RS subsetD) 1);  | 
|
| 760 | 271  | 
qed "restrict_type2";  | 
| 0 | 272  | 
|
| 2877 | 273  | 
goalw ZF.thy [restrict_def] "!!a A. a : A ==> restrict(f,A) ` a = f`a";  | 
| 0 | 274  | 
by (etac beta 1);  | 
| 760 | 275  | 
qed "restrict";  | 
| 0 | 276  | 
|
| 2877 | 277  | 
goalw ZF.thy [restrict_def] "restrict(f,0) = 0";  | 
| 2469 | 278  | 
by (Simp_tac 1);  | 
279  | 
qed "restrict_empty";  | 
|
280  | 
||
281  | 
Addsimps [restrict, restrict_empty];  | 
|
282  | 
||
| 0 | 283  | 
(*NOT SAFE as a congruence rule for the simplifier! Can cause it to fail!*)  | 
| 2877 | 284  | 
val prems = goalw ZF.thy [restrict_def]  | 
| 0 | 285  | 
"[| A=B; !!x. x:B ==> f`x=g`x |] ==> restrict(f,A) = restrict(g,B)";  | 
286  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac (prems@[lam_cong]) 1));  | 
|
| 760 | 287  | 
qed "restrict_eqI";  | 
| 0 | 288  | 
|
| 2877 | 289  | 
goalw ZF.thy [restrict_def, lam_def] "domain(restrict(f,C)) = C";  | 
290  | 
by (Blast_tac 1);  | 
|
| 760 | 291  | 
qed "domain_restrict";  | 
| 0 | 292  | 
|
| 2877 | 293  | 
val [prem] = goalw ZF.thy [restrict_def]  | 
| 0 | 294  | 
"A<=C ==> restrict(lam x:C. b(x), A) = (lam x:A. b(x))";  | 
295  | 
by (rtac (refl RS lam_cong) 1);  | 
|
| 1461 | 296  | 
by (etac (prem RS subsetD RS beta) 1); (*easier than calling simp_tac*)  | 
| 760 | 297  | 
qed "restrict_lam_eq";  | 
| 0 | 298  | 
|
299  | 
||
300  | 
||
301  | 
(*** Unions of functions ***)  | 
|
302  | 
||
303  | 
(** The Union of a set of COMPATIBLE functions is a function **)  | 
|
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
304  | 
|
| 2877 | 305  | 
goalw ZF.thy [function_def]  | 
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
306  | 
"!!S. [| ALL x:S. function(x); \  | 
| 
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
307  | 
\ ALL x:S. ALL y:S. x<=y | y<=x |] ==> \  | 
| 
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
308  | 
\ function(Union(S))";  | 
| 2925 | 309  | 
by (fast_tac (ZF_cs addSDs [bspec RS bspec]) 1);  | 
310  | 
(*by (Blast_tac 1); takes too long...*)  | 
|
| 760 | 311  | 
qed "function_Union";  | 
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
312  | 
|
| 2877 | 313  | 
goalw ZF.thy [Pi_def]  | 
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
314  | 
"!!S. [| ALL f:S. EX C D. f:C->D; \  | 
| 
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
315  | 
\ ALL f:S. ALL y:S. f<=y | y<=f |] ==> \  | 
| 
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
316  | 
\ Union(S) : domain(Union(S)) -> range(Union(S))";  | 
| 2877 | 317  | 
by (blast_tac (subset_cs addSIs [rel_Union, function_Union]) 1);  | 
| 760 | 318  | 
qed "fun_Union";  | 
| 0 | 319  | 
|
320  | 
||
321  | 
(** The Union of 2 disjoint functions is a function **)  | 
|
322  | 
||
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
323  | 
val Un_rls = [Un_subset_iff, domain_Un_eq, SUM_Un_distrib1, prod_Un_distrib2,  | 
| 1461 | 324  | 
Un_upper1 RSN (2, subset_trans),  | 
325  | 
Un_upper2 RSN (2, subset_trans)];  | 
|
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
326  | 
|
| 2925 | 327  | 
goal ZF.thy "!!f. [| f: A->B; g: C->D; A Int C = 0 |] \  | 
328  | 
\ ==> (f Un g) : (A Un C) -> (B Un D)";  | 
|
| 2877 | 329  | 
(*Prove the product and domain subgoals using distributive laws*)  | 
| 4091 | 330  | 
by (asm_full_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [Pi_iff,extension]@Un_rls) 1);  | 
| 1461 | 331  | 
by (rewtac function_def);  | 
| 4091 | 332  | 
by (Blast.depth_tac (claset()) 12 1); (*9 secs*)  | 
| 760 | 333  | 
qed "fun_disjoint_Un";  | 
| 0 | 334  | 
|
| 2877 | 335  | 
goal ZF.thy  | 
| 0 | 336  | 
"!!f g a. [| a:A; f: A->B; g: C->D; A Int C = 0 |] ==> \  | 
337  | 
\ (f Un g)`a = f`a";  | 
|
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
338  | 
by (rtac (apply_Pair RS UnI1 RS apply_equality) 1);  | 
| 
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
339  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac [fun_disjoint_Un] 1));  | 
| 760 | 340  | 
qed "fun_disjoint_apply1";  | 
| 0 | 341  | 
|
| 2877 | 342  | 
goal ZF.thy  | 
| 0 | 343  | 
"!!f g c. [| c:C; f: A->B; g: C->D; A Int C = 0 |] ==> \  | 
344  | 
\ (f Un g)`c = g`c";  | 
|
| 
691
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
345  | 
by (rtac (apply_Pair RS UnI2 RS apply_equality) 1);  | 
| 
 
b9fc536792bb
ZF/func: tidied many proofs, using new definition of Pi(A,B)
 
lcp 
parents: 
538 
diff
changeset
 | 
346  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac [fun_disjoint_Un] 1));  | 
| 760 | 347  | 
qed "fun_disjoint_apply2";  | 
| 0 | 348  | 
|
349  | 
(** Domain and range of a function/relation **)  | 
|
350  | 
||
| 2877 | 351  | 
goalw ZF.thy [Pi_def] "!!f. f : Pi(A,B) ==> domain(f)=A";  | 
352  | 
by (Blast_tac 1);  | 
|
| 760 | 353  | 
qed "domain_of_fun";  | 
| 0 | 354  | 
|
| 2877 | 355  | 
goal ZF.thy "!!f. [| f : Pi(A,B); a: A |] ==> f`a : range(f)";  | 
| 517 | 356  | 
by (etac (apply_Pair RS rangeI) 1);  | 
357  | 
by (assume_tac 1);  | 
|
| 760 | 358  | 
qed "apply_rangeI";  | 
| 517 | 359  | 
|
| 2877 | 360  | 
val [major] = goal ZF.thy "f : Pi(A,B) ==> f : A->range(f)";  | 
| 0 | 361  | 
by (rtac (major RS Pi_type) 1);  | 
| 517 | 362  | 
by (etac (major RS apply_rangeI) 1);  | 
| 760 | 363  | 
qed "range_of_fun";  | 
| 0 | 364  | 
|
365  | 
(*** Extensions of functions ***)  | 
|
366  | 
||
| 2877 | 367  | 
goal ZF.thy  | 
| 37 | 368  | 
"!!f A B. [| f: A->B; c~:A |] ==> cons(<c,b>,f) : cons(c,A) -> cons(b,B)";  | 
| 857 | 369  | 
by (forward_tac [singleton_fun RS fun_disjoint_Un] 1);  | 
| 519 | 370  | 
by (asm_full_simp_tac (FOL_ss addsimps [cons_eq]) 2);  | 
| 2877 | 371  | 
by (Blast_tac 1);  | 
| 760 | 372  | 
qed "fun_extend";  | 
| 0 | 373  | 
|
| 2877 | 374  | 
goal ZF.thy  | 
| 538 | 375  | 
"!!f A B. [| f: A->B; c~:A; b: B |] ==> cons(<c,b>,f) : cons(c,A) -> B";  | 
| 4091 | 376  | 
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [fun_extend RS fun_weaken_type]) 1);  | 
| 760 | 377  | 
qed "fun_extend3";  | 
| 538 | 378  | 
|
| 2877 | 379  | 
goal ZF.thy "!!f A B. [| f: A->B; a:A; c~:A |] ==> cons(<c,b>,f)`a = f`a";  | 
| 0 | 380  | 
by (rtac (apply_Pair RS consI2 RS apply_equality) 1);  | 
381  | 
by (rtac fun_extend 3);  | 
|
382  | 
by (REPEAT (assume_tac 1));  | 
|
| 760 | 383  | 
qed "fun_extend_apply1";  | 
| 0 | 384  | 
|
| 2877 | 385  | 
goal ZF.thy "!!f A B. [| f: A->B; c~:A |] ==> cons(<c,b>,f)`c = b";  | 
| 0 | 386  | 
by (rtac (consI1 RS apply_equality) 1);  | 
387  | 
by (rtac fun_extend 1);  | 
|
388  | 
by (REPEAT (assume_tac 1));  | 
|
| 760 | 389  | 
qed "fun_extend_apply2";  | 
| 0 | 390  | 
|
| 2469 | 391  | 
bind_thm ("singleton_apply", [singletonI, singleton_fun] MRS apply_equality);
 | 
392  | 
Addsimps [singleton_apply];  | 
|
393  | 
||
| 538 | 394  | 
(*For Finite.ML. Inclusion of right into left is easy*)  | 
| 2877 | 395  | 
goal ZF.thy  | 
| 485 | 396  | 
    "!!c. c ~: A ==> cons(c,A) -> B = (UN f: A->B. UN b:B. {cons(<c,b>, f)})";
 | 
| 
737
 
436019ca97d7
cons_fun_eq: modified strange uses of classical reasoner
 
lcp 
parents: 
691 
diff
changeset
 | 
397  | 
by (rtac equalityI 1);  | 
| 4091 | 398  | 
by (safe_tac (claset() addSEs [fun_extend3]));  | 
| 485 | 399  | 
(*Inclusion of left into right*)  | 
400  | 
by (subgoal_tac "restrict(x, A) : A -> B" 1);  | 
|
| 4091 | 401  | 
by (blast_tac (claset() addIs [restrict_type2]) 2);  | 
| 485 | 402  | 
by (rtac UN_I 1 THEN assume_tac 1);  | 
| 
737
 
436019ca97d7
cons_fun_eq: modified strange uses of classical reasoner
 
lcp 
parents: 
691 
diff
changeset
 | 
403  | 
by (rtac (apply_funtype RS UN_I) 1 THEN REPEAT (ares_tac [consI1] 1));  | 
| 2469 | 404  | 
by (Simp_tac 1);  | 
| 1461 | 405  | 
by (rtac fun_extension 1 THEN REPEAT (ares_tac [fun_extend] 1));  | 
| 485 | 406  | 
by (etac consE 1);  | 
407  | 
by (ALLGOALS  | 
|
| 4091 | 408  | 
(asm_simp_tac (simpset() addsimps [restrict, fun_extend_apply1,  | 
| 2493 | 409  | 
fun_extend_apply2])));  | 
| 760 | 410  | 
qed "cons_fun_eq";  | 
| 485 | 411  |