| author | wenzelm | 
| Sun, 03 Dec 2017 18:53:49 +0100 | |
| changeset 67120 | 491fd7f0b5df | 
| parent 62020 | 5d208fd2507d | 
| child 67443 | 3abf6a722518 | 
| permissions | -rw-r--r-- | 
| 26322 | 1 | (* Title: FOLP/ex/Intuitionistic.thy | 
| 2 | Author: Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory | |
| 3 | Copyright 1991 University of Cambridge | |
| 4 | ||
| 5 | Intuitionistic First-Order Logic. | |
| 6 | ||
| 7 | Single-step commands: | |
| 8 | by (IntPr.step_tac 1) | |
| 9 | by (biresolve_tac safe_brls 1); | |
| 10 | by (biresolve_tac haz_brls 1); | |
| 11 | by (assume_tac 1); | |
| 12 | by (IntPr.safe_tac 1); | |
| 13 | by (IntPr.mp_tac 1); | |
| 14 | by (IntPr.fast_tac 1); | |
| 15 | *) | |
| 16 | ||
| 17 | (*Note: for PROPOSITIONAL formulae... | |
| 18 | ~A is classically provable iff it is intuitionistically provable. | |
| 19 | Therefore A is classically provable iff ~~A is intuitionistically provable. | |
| 20 | ||
| 21 | Let Q be the conjuction of the propositions A|~A, one for each atom A in | |
| 22 | P. If P is provable classically, then clearly P&Q is provable | |
| 23 | intuitionistically, so ~~(P&Q) is also provable intuitionistically. | |
| 24 | The latter is intuitionistically equivalent to ~~P&~~Q, hence to ~~P, | |
| 25 | since ~~Q is intuitionistically provable. Finally, if P is a negation then | |
| 26 | ~~P is intuitionstically equivalent to P. [Andy Pitts] | |
| 27 | *) | |
| 28 | ||
| 29 | theory Intuitionistic | |
| 30 | imports IFOLP | |
| 31 | begin | |
| 32 | ||
| 61337 | 33 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~(P&Q) <-> ~~P & ~~Q" | 
| 60770 | 34 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 35 | |
| 61337 | 36 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~~P <-> ~P" | 
| 60770 | 37 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 38 | |
| 61337 | 39 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~((P --> Q | R) --> (P-->Q) | (P-->R))" | 
| 60770 | 40 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 41 | |
| 61337 | 42 | schematic_goal "?p : (P<->Q) <-> (Q<->P)" | 
| 60770 | 43 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 44 | |
| 45 | ||
| 60770 | 46 | subsection \<open>Lemmas for the propositional double-negation translation\<close> | 
| 26322 | 47 | |
| 61337 | 48 | schematic_goal "?p : P --> ~~P" | 
| 60770 | 49 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 50 | |
| 61337 | 51 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~(~~P --> P)" | 
| 60770 | 52 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 53 | |
| 61337 | 54 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~P & ~~(P --> Q) --> ~~Q" | 
| 60770 | 55 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 56 | |
| 57 | ||
| 60770 | 58 | subsection \<open>The following are classically but not constructively valid\<close> | 
| 26322 | 59 | |
| 60 | (*The attempt to prove them terminates quickly!*) | |
| 61337 | 61 | schematic_goal "?p : ((P-->Q) --> P) --> P" | 
| 60770 | 62 |   apply (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)?
 | 
| 26322 | 63 | oops | 
| 64 | ||
| 61337 | 65 | schematic_goal "?p : (P&Q-->R) --> (P-->R) | (Q-->R)" | 
| 60770 | 66 |   apply (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)?
 | 
| 26322 | 67 | oops | 
| 68 | ||
| 69 | ||
| 60770 | 70 | subsection \<open>Intuitionistic FOL: propositional problems based on Pelletier\<close> | 
| 26322 | 71 | |
| 72 | text "Problem ~~1" | |
| 61337 | 73 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~((P-->Q) <-> (~Q --> ~P))" | 
| 60770 | 74 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 75 | |
| 76 | text "Problem ~~2" | |
| 61337 | 77 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~(~~P <-> P)" | 
| 60770 | 78 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 79 | |
| 80 | text "Problem 3" | |
| 61337 | 81 | schematic_goal "?p : ~(P-->Q) --> (Q-->P)" | 
| 60770 | 82 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 83 | |
| 84 | text "Problem ~~4" | |
| 61337 | 85 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~((~P-->Q) <-> (~Q --> P))" | 
| 60770 | 86 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 87 | |
| 88 | text "Problem ~~5" | |
| 61337 | 89 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~((P|Q-->P|R) --> P|(Q-->R))" | 
| 60770 | 90 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 91 | |
| 92 | text "Problem ~~6" | |
| 61337 | 93 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~(P | ~P)" | 
| 60770 | 94 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 95 | |
| 96 | text "Problem ~~7" | |
| 61337 | 97 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~(P | ~~~P)" | 
| 60770 | 98 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 99 | |
| 100 | text "Problem ~~8. Peirce's law" | |
| 61337 | 101 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~(((P-->Q) --> P) --> P)" | 
| 60770 | 102 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 103 | |
| 104 | text "Problem 9" | |
| 61337 | 105 | schematic_goal "?p : ((P|Q) & (~P|Q) & (P| ~Q)) --> ~ (~P | ~Q)" | 
| 60770 | 106 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 107 | |
| 108 | text "Problem 10" | |
| 61337 | 109 | schematic_goal "?p : (Q-->R) --> (R-->P&Q) --> (P-->(Q|R)) --> (P<->Q)" | 
| 60770 | 110 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 111 | |
| 112 | text "11. Proved in each direction (incorrectly, says Pelletier!!) " | |
| 61337 | 113 | schematic_goal "?p : P<->P" | 
| 60770 | 114 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 115 | |
| 116 | text "Problem ~~12. Dijkstra's law " | |
| 61337 | 117 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~(((P <-> Q) <-> R) <-> (P <-> (Q <-> R)))" | 
| 60770 | 118 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 119 | |
| 61337 | 120 | schematic_goal "?p : ((P <-> Q) <-> R) --> ~~(P <-> (Q <-> R))" | 
| 60770 | 121 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 122 | |
| 123 | text "Problem 13. Distributive law" | |
| 61337 | 124 | schematic_goal "?p : P | (Q & R) <-> (P | Q) & (P | R)" | 
| 60770 | 125 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 126 | |
| 127 | text "Problem ~~14" | |
| 61337 | 128 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~((P <-> Q) <-> ((Q | ~P) & (~Q|P)))" | 
| 60770 | 129 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 130 | |
| 131 | text "Problem ~~15" | |
| 61337 | 132 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~((P --> Q) <-> (~P | Q))" | 
| 60770 | 133 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 134 | |
| 135 | text "Problem ~~16" | |
| 61337 | 136 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~((P-->Q) | (Q-->P))" | 
| 60770 | 137 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 138 | |
| 139 | text "Problem ~~17" | |
| 61337 | 140 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~(((P & (Q-->R))-->S) <-> ((~P | Q | S) & (~P | ~R | S)))" | 
| 62020 | 141 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)  \<comment> slow
 | 
| 26322 | 142 | |
| 143 | ||
| 60770 | 144 | subsection \<open>Examples with quantifiers\<close> | 
| 26322 | 145 | |
| 146 | text "The converse is classical in the following implications..." | |
| 147 | ||
| 61337 | 148 | schematic_goal "?p : (EX x. P(x)-->Q) --> (ALL x. P(x)) --> Q" | 
| 60770 | 149 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 150 | |
| 61337 | 151 | schematic_goal "?p : ((ALL x. P(x))-->Q) --> ~ (ALL x. P(x) & ~Q)" | 
| 60770 | 152 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 153 | |
| 61337 | 154 | schematic_goal "?p : ((ALL x. ~P(x))-->Q) --> ~ (ALL x. ~ (P(x)|Q))" | 
| 60770 | 155 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 156 | |
| 61337 | 157 | schematic_goal "?p : (ALL x. P(x)) | Q --> (ALL x. P(x) | Q)" | 
| 60770 | 158 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 159 | |
| 61337 | 160 | schematic_goal "?p : (EX x. P --> Q(x)) --> (P --> (EX x. Q(x)))" | 
| 60770 | 161 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 162 | |
| 163 | ||
| 164 | text "The following are not constructively valid!" | |
| 165 | text "The attempt to prove them terminates quickly!" | |
| 166 | ||
| 61337 | 167 | schematic_goal "?p : ((ALL x. P(x))-->Q) --> (EX x. P(x)-->Q)" | 
| 60770 | 168 |   apply (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)?
 | 
| 26322 | 169 | oops | 
| 170 | ||
| 61337 | 171 | schematic_goal "?p : (P --> (EX x. Q(x))) --> (EX x. P-->Q(x))" | 
| 60770 | 172 |   apply (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)?
 | 
| 26322 | 173 | oops | 
| 174 | ||
| 61337 | 175 | schematic_goal "?p : (ALL x. P(x) | Q) --> ((ALL x. P(x)) | Q)" | 
| 60770 | 176 |   apply (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)?
 | 
| 26322 | 177 | oops | 
| 178 | ||
| 61337 | 179 | schematic_goal "?p : (ALL x. ~~P(x)) --> ~~(ALL x. P(x))" | 
| 60770 | 180 |   apply (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)?
 | 
| 26322 | 181 | oops | 
| 182 | ||
| 183 | (*Classically but not intuitionistically valid. Proved by a bug in 1986!*) | |
| 61337 | 184 | schematic_goal "?p : EX x. Q(x) --> (ALL x. Q(x))" | 
| 60770 | 185 |   apply (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)?
 | 
| 26322 | 186 | oops | 
| 187 | ||
| 188 | ||
| 189 | subsection "Hard examples with quantifiers" | |
| 190 | ||
| 60770 | 191 | text \<open> | 
| 26322 | 192 | The ones that have not been proved are not known to be valid! | 
| 193 | Some will require quantifier duplication -- not currently available. | |
| 60770 | 194 | \<close> | 
| 26322 | 195 | |
| 196 | text "Problem ~~18" | |
| 61337 | 197 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~(EX y. ALL x. P(y)-->P(x))" oops | 
| 26322 | 198 | (*NOT PROVED*) | 
| 199 | ||
| 200 | text "Problem ~~19" | |
| 61337 | 201 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~(EX x. ALL y z. (P(y)-->Q(z)) --> (P(x)-->Q(x)))" oops | 
| 26322 | 202 | (*NOT PROVED*) | 
| 203 | ||
| 204 | text "Problem 20" | |
| 61337 | 205 | schematic_goal "?p : (ALL x y. EX z. ALL w. (P(x)&Q(y)-->R(z)&S(w))) | 
| 26322 | 206 | --> (EX x y. P(x) & Q(y)) --> (EX z. R(z))" | 
| 60770 | 207 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 208 | |
| 209 | text "Problem 21" | |
| 61337 | 210 | schematic_goal "?p : (EX x. P-->Q(x)) & (EX x. Q(x)-->P) --> ~~(EX x. P<->Q(x))" oops | 
| 26322 | 211 | (*NOT PROVED*) | 
| 212 | ||
| 213 | text "Problem 22" | |
| 61337 | 214 | schematic_goal "?p : (ALL x. P <-> Q(x)) --> (P <-> (ALL x. Q(x)))" | 
| 60770 | 215 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 216 | |
| 217 | text "Problem ~~23" | |
| 61337 | 218 | schematic_goal "?p : ~~ ((ALL x. P | Q(x)) <-> (P | (ALL x. Q(x))))" | 
| 60770 | 219 |   by (tactic \<open>IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1\<close>)
 | 
| 26322 | 220 | |
| 221 | text "Problem 24" | |
| 61337 | 222 | schematic_goal "?p : ~(EX x. S(x)&Q(x)) & (ALL x. P(x) --> Q(x)|R(x)) & | 
| 26322 | 223 | (~(EX x. P(x)) --> (EX x. Q(x))) & (ALL x. Q(x)|R(x) --> S(x)) | 
| 224 | --> ~~(EX x. P(x)&R(x))" | |
| 225 | (*Not clear why fast_tac, best_tac, ASTAR and ITER_DEEPEN all take forever*) | |
| 58963 
26bf09b95dda
proper context for assume_tac (atac remains as fall-back without context);
 wenzelm parents: 
36319diff
changeset | 226 |   apply (tactic "IntPr.safe_tac @{context}")
 | 
| 26322 | 227 | apply (erule impE) | 
| 58963 
26bf09b95dda
proper context for assume_tac (atac remains as fall-back without context);
 wenzelm parents: 
36319diff
changeset | 228 |    apply (tactic "IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1")
 | 
| 
26bf09b95dda
proper context for assume_tac (atac remains as fall-back without context);
 wenzelm parents: 
36319diff
changeset | 229 |   apply (tactic "IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1")
 | 
| 26322 | 230 | done | 
| 231 | ||
| 232 | text "Problem 25" | |
| 61337 | 233 | schematic_goal "?p : (EX x. P(x)) & | 
| 26322 | 234 | (ALL x. L(x) --> ~ (M(x) & R(x))) & | 
| 235 | (ALL x. P(x) --> (M(x) & L(x))) & | |
| 236 | ((ALL x. P(x)-->Q(x)) | (EX x. P(x)&R(x))) | |
| 237 | --> (EX x. Q(x)&P(x))" | |
| 58963 
26bf09b95dda
proper context for assume_tac (atac remains as fall-back without context);
 wenzelm parents: 
36319diff
changeset | 238 |   by (tactic "IntPr.best_tac @{context} 1")
 | 
| 26322 | 239 | |
| 240 | text "Problem 29. Essentially the same as Principia Mathematica *11.71" | |
| 61337 | 241 | schematic_goal "?p : (EX x. P(x)) & (EX y. Q(y)) | 
| 26322 | 242 | --> ((ALL x. P(x)-->R(x)) & (ALL y. Q(y)-->S(y)) <-> | 
| 243 | (ALL x y. P(x) & Q(y) --> R(x) & S(y)))" | |
| 58963 
26bf09b95dda
proper context for assume_tac (atac remains as fall-back without context);
 wenzelm parents: 
36319diff
changeset | 244 |   by (tactic "IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1")
 | 
| 26322 | 245 | |
| 246 | text "Problem ~~30" | |
| 61337 | 247 | schematic_goal "?p : (ALL x. (P(x) | Q(x)) --> ~ R(x)) & | 
| 26322 | 248 | (ALL x. (Q(x) --> ~ S(x)) --> P(x) & R(x)) | 
| 249 | --> (ALL x. ~~S(x))" | |
| 58963 
26bf09b95dda
proper context for assume_tac (atac remains as fall-back without context);
 wenzelm parents: 
36319diff
changeset | 250 |   by (tactic "IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1")
 | 
| 26322 | 251 | |
| 252 | text "Problem 31" | |
| 61337 | 253 | schematic_goal "?p : ~(EX x. P(x) & (Q(x) | R(x))) & | 
| 26322 | 254 | (EX x. L(x) & P(x)) & | 
| 255 | (ALL x. ~ R(x) --> M(x)) | |
| 256 | --> (EX x. L(x) & M(x))" | |
| 58963 
26bf09b95dda
proper context for assume_tac (atac remains as fall-back without context);
 wenzelm parents: 
36319diff
changeset | 257 |   by (tactic "IntPr.fast_tac @{context} 1")
 | 
| 26322 | 258 | |
| 259 | text "Problem 32" | |
| 61337 | 260 | schematic_goal "?p : (ALL x. P(x) & (Q(x)|R(x))-->S(x)) & | 
| 26322 | 261 | (ALL x. S(x) & R(x) --> L(x)) & | 
| 262 | (ALL x. M(x) --> R(x)) | |
| 263 | --> (ALL x. P(x) & M(x) --> L(x))" | |
| 62020 | 264 |   by (tactic "IntPr.best_tac @{context} 1") \<comment> slow
 | 
| 26322 | 265 | |
| 266 | text "Problem 39" | |
| 61337 | 267 | schematic_goal "?p : ~ (EX x. ALL y. F(y,x) <-> ~F(y,y))" | 
| 58963 
26bf09b95dda
proper context for assume_tac (atac remains as fall-back without context);
 wenzelm parents: 
36319diff
changeset | 268 |   by (tactic "IntPr.best_tac @{context} 1")
 | 
| 26322 | 269 | |
| 270 | text "Problem 40. AMENDED" | |
| 61337 | 271 | schematic_goal "?p : (EX y. ALL x. F(x,y) <-> F(x,x)) --> | 
| 26322 | 272 | ~(ALL x. EX y. ALL z. F(z,y) <-> ~ F(z,x))" | 
| 62020 | 273 |   by (tactic "IntPr.best_tac @{context} 1") \<comment> slow
 | 
| 26322 | 274 | |
| 275 | text "Problem 44" | |
| 61337 | 276 | schematic_goal "?p : (ALL x. f(x) --> | 
| 26322 | 277 | (EX y. g(y) & h(x,y) & (EX y. g(y) & ~ h(x,y)))) & | 
| 278 | (EX x. j(x) & (ALL y. g(y) --> h(x,y))) | |
| 279 | --> (EX x. j(x) & ~f(x))" | |
| 58963 
26bf09b95dda
proper context for assume_tac (atac remains as fall-back without context);
 wenzelm parents: 
36319diff
changeset | 280 |   by (tactic "IntPr.best_tac @{context} 1")
 | 
| 26322 | 281 | |
| 282 | text "Problem 48" | |
| 61337 | 283 | schematic_goal "?p : (a=b | c=d) & (a=c | b=d) --> a=d | b=c" | 
| 58963 
26bf09b95dda
proper context for assume_tac (atac remains as fall-back without context);
 wenzelm parents: 
36319diff
changeset | 284 |   by (tactic "IntPr.best_tac @{context} 1")
 | 
| 26322 | 285 | |
| 286 | text "Problem 51" | |
| 61337 | 287 | schematic_goal | 
| 26322 | 288 | "?p : (EX z w. ALL x y. P(x,y) <-> (x=z & y=w)) --> | 
| 289 | (EX z. ALL x. EX w. (ALL y. P(x,y) <-> y=w) <-> x=z)" | |
| 62020 | 290 |   by (tactic "IntPr.best_tac @{context} 1") \<comment> \<open>60 seconds\<close>
 | 
| 26322 | 291 | |
| 292 | text "Problem 56" | |
| 61337 | 293 | schematic_goal "?p : (ALL x. (EX y. P(y) & x=f(y)) --> P(x)) <-> (ALL x. P(x) --> P(f(x)))" | 
| 58963 
26bf09b95dda
proper context for assume_tac (atac remains as fall-back without context);
 wenzelm parents: 
36319diff
changeset | 294 |   by (tactic "IntPr.best_tac @{context} 1")
 | 
| 26322 | 295 | |
| 296 | text "Problem 57" | |
| 61337 | 297 | schematic_goal | 
| 26322 | 298 | "?p : P(f(a,b), f(b,c)) & P(f(b,c), f(a,c)) & | 
| 299 | (ALL x y z. P(x,y) & P(y,z) --> P(x,z)) --> P(f(a,b), f(a,c))" | |
| 58963 
26bf09b95dda
proper context for assume_tac (atac remains as fall-back without context);
 wenzelm parents: 
36319diff
changeset | 300 |   by (tactic "IntPr.best_tac @{context} 1")
 | 
| 26322 | 301 | |
| 302 | text "Problem 60" | |
| 61337 | 303 | schematic_goal "?p : ALL x. P(x,f(x)) <-> (EX y. (ALL z. P(z,y) --> P(z,f(x))) & P(x,y))" | 
| 58963 
26bf09b95dda
proper context for assume_tac (atac remains as fall-back without context);
 wenzelm parents: 
36319diff
changeset | 304 |   by (tactic "IntPr.best_tac @{context} 1")
 | 
| 26322 | 305 | |
| 306 | end |