| author | kleing | 
| Wed, 07 May 2003 17:04:45 +0200 | |
| changeset 13970 | 4aef7117817b | 
| parent 3837 | d7f033c74b38 | 
| child 17456 | bcf7544875b2 | 
| permissions | -rw-r--r-- | 
| 1459 | 1  | 
(* Title: CCL/gfp  | 
| 0 | 2  | 
ID: $Id$  | 
3  | 
||
4  | 
Modified version of  | 
|
| 1459 | 5  | 
Title: HOL/gfp  | 
6  | 
Author: Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory  | 
|
| 0 | 7  | 
Copyright 1993 University of Cambridge  | 
8  | 
||
9  | 
For gfp.thy. The Knaster-Tarski Theorem for greatest fixed points.  | 
|
10  | 
*)  | 
|
11  | 
||
12  | 
open Gfp;  | 
|
13  | 
||
14  | 
(*** Proof of Knaster-Tarski Theorem using gfp ***)  | 
|
15  | 
||
16  | 
(* gfp(f) is the least upper bound of {u. u <= f(u)} *)
 | 
|
17  | 
||
18  | 
val prems = goalw Gfp.thy [gfp_def] "[| A <= f(A) |] ==> A <= gfp(f)";  | 
|
19  | 
by (rtac (CollectI RS Union_upper) 1);  | 
|
20  | 
by (resolve_tac prems 1);  | 
|
| 757 | 21  | 
qed "gfp_upperbound";  | 
| 0 | 22  | 
|
23  | 
val prems = goalw Gfp.thy [gfp_def]  | 
|
24  | 
"[| !!u. u <= f(u) ==> u<=A |] ==> gfp(f) <= A";  | 
|
25  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac ([Union_least]@prems) 1));  | 
|
26  | 
by (etac CollectD 1);  | 
|
| 757 | 27  | 
qed "gfp_least";  | 
| 0 | 28  | 
|
29  | 
val [mono] = goal Gfp.thy "mono(f) ==> gfp(f) <= f(gfp(f))";  | 
|
30  | 
by (EVERY1 [rtac gfp_least, rtac subset_trans, atac,  | 
|
| 1459 | 31  | 
rtac (mono RS monoD), rtac gfp_upperbound, atac]);  | 
| 757 | 32  | 
qed "gfp_lemma2";  | 
| 0 | 33  | 
|
34  | 
val [mono] = goal Gfp.thy "mono(f) ==> f(gfp(f)) <= gfp(f)";  | 
|
35  | 
by (EVERY1 [rtac gfp_upperbound, rtac (mono RS monoD),  | 
|
| 1459 | 36  | 
rtac gfp_lemma2, rtac mono]);  | 
| 757 | 37  | 
qed "gfp_lemma3";  | 
| 0 | 38  | 
|
39  | 
val [mono] = goal Gfp.thy "mono(f) ==> gfp(f) = f(gfp(f))";  | 
|
40  | 
by (REPEAT (resolve_tac [equalityI,gfp_lemma2,gfp_lemma3,mono] 1));  | 
|
| 757 | 41  | 
qed "gfp_Tarski";  | 
| 0 | 42  | 
|
43  | 
(*** Coinduction rules for greatest fixed points ***)  | 
|
44  | 
||
45  | 
(*weak version*)  | 
|
46  | 
val prems = goal Gfp.thy  | 
|
47  | 
"[| a: A; A <= f(A) |] ==> a : gfp(f)";  | 
|
48  | 
by (rtac (gfp_upperbound RS subsetD) 1);  | 
|
49  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac prems 1));  | 
|
| 757 | 50  | 
qed "coinduct";  | 
| 0 | 51  | 
|
52  | 
val [prem,mono] = goal Gfp.thy  | 
|
53  | 
"[| A <= f(A) Un gfp(f); mono(f) |] ==> \  | 
|
54  | 
\ A Un gfp(f) <= f(A Un gfp(f))";  | 
|
55  | 
by (rtac subset_trans 1);  | 
|
56  | 
by (rtac (mono RS mono_Un) 2);  | 
|
57  | 
by (rtac (mono RS gfp_Tarski RS subst) 1);  | 
|
58  | 
by (rtac (prem RS Un_least) 1);  | 
|
59  | 
by (rtac Un_upper2 1);  | 
|
| 757 | 60  | 
qed "coinduct2_lemma";  | 
| 0 | 61  | 
|
62  | 
(*strong version, thanks to Martin Coen*)  | 
|
| 
642
 
0db578095e6a
CCL/Gfp/coinduct2, coinduct3: modified proofs to suppress deep unification
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
63  | 
val ainA::prems = goal Gfp.thy  | 
| 0 | 64  | 
"[| a: A; A <= f(A) Un gfp(f); mono(f) |] ==> a : gfp(f)";  | 
| 
642
 
0db578095e6a
CCL/Gfp/coinduct2, coinduct3: modified proofs to suppress deep unification
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
65  | 
by (rtac coinduct 1);  | 
| 
 
0db578095e6a
CCL/Gfp/coinduct2, coinduct3: modified proofs to suppress deep unification
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
66  | 
by (rtac (prems MRS coinduct2_lemma) 2);  | 
| 
 
0db578095e6a
CCL/Gfp/coinduct2, coinduct3: modified proofs to suppress deep unification
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
67  | 
by (resolve_tac [ainA RS UnI1] 1);  | 
| 757 | 68  | 
qed "coinduct2";  | 
| 0 | 69  | 
|
70  | 
(*** Even Stronger version of coinduct [by Martin Coen]  | 
|
71  | 
- instead of the condition A <= f(A)  | 
|
72  | 
consider A <= (f(A) Un f(f(A)) ...) Un gfp(A) ***)  | 
|
73  | 
||
| 3837 | 74  | 
val [prem] = goal Gfp.thy "mono(f) ==> mono(%x. f(x) Un A Un B)";  | 
| 0 | 75  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac [subset_refl, monoI, Un_mono, prem RS monoD] 1));  | 
| 757 | 76  | 
qed "coinduct3_mono_lemma";  | 
| 0 | 77  | 
|
78  | 
val [prem,mono] = goal Gfp.thy  | 
|
| 3837 | 79  | 
"[| A <= f(lfp(%x. f(x) Un A Un gfp(f))); mono(f) |] ==> \  | 
80  | 
\ lfp(%x. f(x) Un A Un gfp(f)) <= f(lfp(%x. f(x) Un A Un gfp(f)))";  | 
|
| 0 | 81  | 
by (rtac subset_trans 1);  | 
| 
642
 
0db578095e6a
CCL/Gfp/coinduct2, coinduct3: modified proofs to suppress deep unification
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
82  | 
by (rtac (mono RS coinduct3_mono_lemma RS lfp_lemma3) 1);  | 
| 0 | 83  | 
by (rtac (Un_least RS Un_least) 1);  | 
| 
642
 
0db578095e6a
CCL/Gfp/coinduct2, coinduct3: modified proofs to suppress deep unification
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
84  | 
by (rtac subset_refl 1);  | 
| 
 
0db578095e6a
CCL/Gfp/coinduct2, coinduct3: modified proofs to suppress deep unification
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
85  | 
by (rtac prem 1);  | 
| 
 
0db578095e6a
CCL/Gfp/coinduct2, coinduct3: modified proofs to suppress deep unification
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
86  | 
by (rtac (mono RS gfp_Tarski RS equalityD1 RS subset_trans) 1);  | 
| 0 | 87  | 
by (rtac (mono RS monoD) 1);  | 
| 2035 | 88  | 
by (stac (mono RS coinduct3_mono_lemma RS lfp_Tarski) 1);  | 
| 0 | 89  | 
by (rtac Un_upper2 1);  | 
| 757 | 90  | 
qed "coinduct3_lemma";  | 
| 0 | 91  | 
|
| 
642
 
0db578095e6a
CCL/Gfp/coinduct2, coinduct3: modified proofs to suppress deep unification
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
92  | 
val ainA::prems = goal Gfp.thy  | 
| 3837 | 93  | 
"[| a:A; A <= f(lfp(%x. f(x) Un A Un gfp(f))); mono(f) |] ==> a : gfp(f)";  | 
| 
642
 
0db578095e6a
CCL/Gfp/coinduct2, coinduct3: modified proofs to suppress deep unification
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
94  | 
by (rtac coinduct 1);  | 
| 
 
0db578095e6a
CCL/Gfp/coinduct2, coinduct3: modified proofs to suppress deep unification
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
95  | 
by (rtac (prems MRS coinduct3_lemma) 2);  | 
| 
 
0db578095e6a
CCL/Gfp/coinduct2, coinduct3: modified proofs to suppress deep unification
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
96  | 
by (resolve_tac (prems RL [coinduct3_mono_lemma RS lfp_Tarski RS ssubst]) 1);  | 
| 
 
0db578095e6a
CCL/Gfp/coinduct2, coinduct3: modified proofs to suppress deep unification
 
lcp 
parents: 
0 
diff
changeset
 | 
97  | 
by (rtac (ainA RS UnI2 RS UnI1) 1);  | 
| 757 | 98  | 
qed "coinduct3";  | 
| 0 | 99  | 
|
100  | 
||
101  | 
(** Definition forms of gfp_Tarski, to control unfolding **)  | 
|
102  | 
||
103  | 
val [rew,mono] = goal Gfp.thy "[| h==gfp(f); mono(f) |] ==> h = f(h)";  | 
|
104  | 
by (rewtac rew);  | 
|
105  | 
by (rtac (mono RS gfp_Tarski) 1);  | 
|
| 757 | 106  | 
qed "def_gfp_Tarski";  | 
| 0 | 107  | 
|
108  | 
val rew::prems = goal Gfp.thy  | 
|
109  | 
"[| h==gfp(f); a:A; A <= f(A) |] ==> a: h";  | 
|
110  | 
by (rewtac rew);  | 
|
111  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac (prems @ [coinduct]) 1));  | 
|
| 757 | 112  | 
qed "def_coinduct";  | 
| 0 | 113  | 
|
114  | 
val rew::prems = goal Gfp.thy  | 
|
115  | 
"[| h==gfp(f); a:A; A <= f(A) Un h; mono(f) |] ==> a: h";  | 
|
116  | 
by (rewtac rew);  | 
|
117  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac (map (rewrite_rule [rew]) prems @ [coinduct2]) 1));  | 
|
| 757 | 118  | 
qed "def_coinduct2";  | 
| 0 | 119  | 
|
120  | 
val rew::prems = goal Gfp.thy  | 
|
| 3837 | 121  | 
"[| h==gfp(f); a:A; A <= f(lfp(%x. f(x) Un A Un h)); mono(f) |] ==> a: h";  | 
| 0 | 122  | 
by (rewtac rew);  | 
123  | 
by (REPEAT (ares_tac (map (rewrite_rule [rew]) prems @ [coinduct3]) 1));  | 
|
| 757 | 124  | 
qed "def_coinduct3";  | 
| 0 | 125  | 
|
126  | 
(*Monotonicity of gfp!*)  | 
|
127  | 
val prems = goal Gfp.thy  | 
|
128  | 
"[| mono(f); !!Z. f(Z)<=g(Z) |] ==> gfp(f) <= gfp(g)";  | 
|
129  | 
by (rtac gfp_upperbound 1);  | 
|
130  | 
by (rtac subset_trans 1);  | 
|
131  | 
by (rtac gfp_lemma2 1);  | 
|
132  | 
by (resolve_tac prems 1);  | 
|
133  | 
by (resolve_tac prems 1);  | 
|
| 757 | 134  | 
qed "gfp_mono";  |