| author | wenzelm | 
| Sat, 31 Dec 2016 14:29:16 +0100 | |
| changeset 64722 | 6df73de0d3c7 | 
| parent 63167 | 0909deb8059b | 
| child 67443 | 3abf6a722518 | 
| permissions | -rw-r--r-- | 
| 43197 | 1  | 
(* Title: HOL/Metis_Examples/Trans_Closure.thy  | 
2  | 
Author: Lawrence C. Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory  | 
|
| 41144 | 3  | 
Author: Jasmin Blanchette, TU Muenchen  | 
| 23449 | 4  | 
|
| 43197 | 5  | 
Metis example featuring the transitive closure.  | 
| 23449 | 6  | 
*)  | 
7  | 
||
| 63167 | 8  | 
section \<open>Metis Example Featuring the Transitive Closure\<close>  | 
| 43197 | 9  | 
|
10  | 
theory Trans_Closure  | 
|
| 
36494
 
2478dd225b68
add an Isar proof found with Sledgehammer that involves a Skolem constant (internally)
 
blanchet 
parents: 
36490 
diff
changeset
 | 
11  | 
imports Main  | 
| 23449 | 12  | 
begin  | 
13  | 
||
| 
50705
 
0e943b33d907
use new skolemizer for reconstructing skolemization steps in Isar proofs (because the old skolemizer messes up the order of the Skolem arguments)
 
blanchet 
parents: 
50020 
diff
changeset
 | 
14  | 
declare [[metis_new_skolem]]  | 
| 
42104
 
22e37d9bc21c
made one more Metis example use the new Skolemizer
 
blanchet 
parents: 
41144 
diff
changeset
 | 
15  | 
|
| 
 
22e37d9bc21c
made one more Metis example use the new Skolemizer
 
blanchet 
parents: 
41144 
diff
changeset
 | 
16  | 
type_synonym addr = nat  | 
| 23449 | 17  | 
|
| 58310 | 18  | 
datatype val  | 
| 63167 | 19  | 
= Unit \<comment> "dummy result value of void expressions"  | 
20  | 
| Null \<comment> "null reference"  | 
|
21  | 
| Bool bool \<comment> "Boolean value"  | 
|
22  | 
| Intg int \<comment> "integer value"  | 
|
23  | 
| Addr addr \<comment> "addresses of objects in the heap"  | 
|
| 23449 | 24  | 
|
| 
36490
 
5abf45444a16
redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
 
blanchet 
parents: 
35096 
diff
changeset
 | 
25  | 
consts R :: "(addr \<times> addr) set"  | 
| 23449 | 26  | 
|
| 
36490
 
5abf45444a16
redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
 
blanchet 
parents: 
35096 
diff
changeset
 | 
27  | 
consts f :: "addr \<Rightarrow> val"  | 
| 23449 | 28  | 
|
| 
36490
 
5abf45444a16
redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
 
blanchet 
parents: 
35096 
diff
changeset
 | 
29  | 
lemma "\<lbrakk>f c = Intg x; \<forall>y. f b = Intg y \<longrightarrow> y \<noteq> x; (a, b) \<in> R\<^sup>*; (b, c) \<in> R\<^sup>*\<rbrakk>  | 
| 
 
5abf45444a16
redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
 
blanchet 
parents: 
35096 
diff
changeset
 | 
30  | 
\<Longrightarrow> \<exists>c. (b, c) \<in> R \<and> (a, c) \<in> R\<^sup>*"  | 
| 
36501
 
6c7ba330ab42
disabled spurious invocation of (interactive) sledgehammer;
 
wenzelm 
parents: 
36494 
diff
changeset
 | 
31  | 
(* sledgehammer *)  | 
| 
36494
 
2478dd225b68
add an Isar proof found with Sledgehammer that involves a Skolem constant (internally)
 
blanchet 
parents: 
36490 
diff
changeset
 | 
32  | 
proof -  | 
| 
 
2478dd225b68
add an Isar proof found with Sledgehammer that involves a Skolem constant (internally)
 
blanchet 
parents: 
36490 
diff
changeset
 | 
33  | 
assume A1: "f c = Intg x"  | 
| 
 
2478dd225b68
add an Isar proof found with Sledgehammer that involves a Skolem constant (internally)
 
blanchet 
parents: 
36490 
diff
changeset
 | 
34  | 
assume A2: "\<forall>y. f b = Intg y \<longrightarrow> y \<noteq> x"  | 
| 
 
2478dd225b68
add an Isar proof found with Sledgehammer that involves a Skolem constant (internally)
 
blanchet 
parents: 
36490 
diff
changeset
 | 
35  | 
assume A3: "(a, b) \<in> R\<^sup>*"  | 
| 
 
2478dd225b68
add an Isar proof found with Sledgehammer that involves a Skolem constant (internally)
 
blanchet 
parents: 
36490 
diff
changeset
 | 
36  | 
assume A4: "(b, c) \<in> R\<^sup>*"  | 
| 
 
2478dd225b68
add an Isar proof found with Sledgehammer that involves a Skolem constant (internally)
 
blanchet 
parents: 
36490 
diff
changeset
 | 
37  | 
have F1: "f c \<noteq> f b" using A2 A1 by metis  | 
| 
 
2478dd225b68
add an Isar proof found with Sledgehammer that involves a Skolem constant (internally)
 
blanchet 
parents: 
36490 
diff
changeset
 | 
38  | 
have F2: "\<forall>u. (b, u) \<in> R \<longrightarrow> (a, u) \<in> R\<^sup>*" using A3 by (metis transitive_closure_trans(6))  | 
| 
42104
 
22e37d9bc21c
made one more Metis example use the new Skolemizer
 
blanchet 
parents: 
41144 
diff
changeset
 | 
39  | 
have F3: "\<exists>x. (b, x b c R) \<in> R \<or> c = b" using A4 by (metis converse_rtranclE)  | 
| 
36494
 
2478dd225b68
add an Isar proof found with Sledgehammer that involves a Skolem constant (internally)
 
blanchet 
parents: 
36490 
diff
changeset
 | 
40  | 
have "c \<noteq> b" using F1 by metis  | 
| 
 
2478dd225b68
add an Isar proof found with Sledgehammer that involves a Skolem constant (internally)
 
blanchet 
parents: 
36490 
diff
changeset
 | 
41  | 
hence "\<exists>u. (b, u) \<in> R" using F3 by metis  | 
| 
 
2478dd225b68
add an Isar proof found with Sledgehammer that involves a Skolem constant (internally)
 
blanchet 
parents: 
36490 
diff
changeset
 | 
42  | 
thus "\<exists>c. (b, c) \<in> R \<and> (a, c) \<in> R\<^sup>*" using F2 by metis  | 
| 
 
2478dd225b68
add an Isar proof found with Sledgehammer that involves a Skolem constant (internally)
 
blanchet 
parents: 
36490 
diff
changeset
 | 
43  | 
qed  | 
| 23449 | 44  | 
|
| 
36490
 
5abf45444a16
redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
 
blanchet 
parents: 
35096 
diff
changeset
 | 
45  | 
lemma "\<lbrakk>f c = Intg x; \<forall>y. f b = Intg y \<longrightarrow> y \<noteq> x; (a, b) \<in> R\<^sup>*; (b,c) \<in> R\<^sup>*\<rbrakk>  | 
| 
 
5abf45444a16
redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
 
blanchet 
parents: 
35096 
diff
changeset
 | 
46  | 
\<Longrightarrow> \<exists>c. (b, c) \<in> R \<and> (a, c) \<in> R\<^sup>*"  | 
| 57245 | 47  | 
(* sledgehammer [isar_proofs, compress = 2] *)  | 
| 
36490
 
5abf45444a16
redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
 
blanchet 
parents: 
35096 
diff
changeset
 | 
48  | 
proof -  | 
| 
 
5abf45444a16
redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
 
blanchet 
parents: 
35096 
diff
changeset
 | 
49  | 
assume A1: "f c = Intg x"  | 
| 
 
5abf45444a16
redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
 
blanchet 
parents: 
35096 
diff
changeset
 | 
50  | 
assume A2: "\<forall>y. f b = Intg y \<longrightarrow> y \<noteq> x"  | 
| 
 
5abf45444a16
redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
 
blanchet 
parents: 
35096 
diff
changeset
 | 
51  | 
assume A3: "(a, b) \<in> R\<^sup>*"  | 
| 
 
5abf45444a16
redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
 
blanchet 
parents: 
35096 
diff
changeset
 | 
52  | 
assume A4: "(b, c) \<in> R\<^sup>*"  | 
| 
 
5abf45444a16
redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
 
blanchet 
parents: 
35096 
diff
changeset
 | 
53  | 
have "b \<noteq> c" using A1 A2 by metis  | 
| 
53015
 
a1119cf551e8
standardized symbols via "isabelle update_sub_sup", excluding src/Pure and src/Tools/WWW_Find;
 
wenzelm 
parents: 
51130 
diff
changeset
 | 
54  | 
hence "\<exists>x\<^sub>1. (b, x\<^sub>1) \<in> R" using A4 by (metis converse_rtranclE)  | 
| 
45970
 
b6d0cff57d96
adjusted to set/pred distinction by means of type constructor `set`
 
haftmann 
parents: 
43197 
diff
changeset
 | 
55  | 
thus "\<exists>c. (b, c) \<in> R \<and> (a, c) \<in> R\<^sup>*" using A3 by (metis transitive_closure_trans(6))  | 
| 23449 | 56  | 
qed  | 
57  | 
||
| 
42104
 
22e37d9bc21c
made one more Metis example use the new Skolemizer
 
blanchet 
parents: 
41144 
diff
changeset
 | 
58  | 
lemma "\<lbrakk>f c = Intg x; \<forall>y. f b = Intg y \<longrightarrow> y \<noteq> x; (a, b) \<in> R\<^sup>*; (b, c) \<in> R\<^sup>*\<rbrakk>  | 
| 
36490
 
5abf45444a16
redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
 
blanchet 
parents: 
35096 
diff
changeset
 | 
59  | 
\<Longrightarrow> \<exists>c. (b, c) \<in> R \<and> (a, c) \<in> R\<^sup>*"  | 
| 
 
5abf45444a16
redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
 
blanchet 
parents: 
35096 
diff
changeset
 | 
60  | 
apply (erule_tac x = b in converse_rtranclE)  | 
| 
 
5abf45444a16
redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
 
blanchet 
parents: 
35096 
diff
changeset
 | 
61  | 
apply metis  | 
| 
 
5abf45444a16
redo Sledgehammer proofs (and get rid of "neg_clausify")
 
blanchet 
parents: 
35096 
diff
changeset
 | 
62  | 
by (metis transitive_closure_trans(6))  | 
| 23449 | 63  | 
|
64  | 
end  |