src/Pure/thm.ML

Improved test for looping rewrite rules.

(*  Title:      Pure/thm.ML
    ID:         $Id$
    Author:     Lawrence C Paulson, Cambridge University Computer Laboratory
    Copyright   1994  University of Cambridge

The abstract types "theory" and "thm".
Also "cterm" / "ctyp" (certified terms / typs under a signature).
*)

signature THM =
sig
  structure Envir 	: ENVIR
  structure Sequence 	: SEQUENCE
  structure Sign 	: SIGN
  type ctyp
  type cterm
  type thm
  type theory
  type meta_simpset
  exception THM of string * int * thm list
  exception THEORY of string * theory list
  exception SIMPLIFIER of string * thm
  (*certified terms/types; previously in sign.ML*)
  val cterm_of		: Sign.sg -> term -> cterm
  val ctyp_of		: Sign.sg -> typ -> ctyp
  val read_ctyp		: Sign.sg -> string -> ctyp
  val read_cterm	: Sign.sg -> string * typ -> cterm
  val rep_cterm		: cterm -> {T:typ, t:term, sign:Sign.sg, maxidx:int}
  val rep_ctyp		: ctyp -> {T: typ, sign: Sign.sg}
  val term_of		: cterm -> term
  val typ_of		: ctyp -> typ
  val cterm_fun		: (term -> term) -> (cterm -> cterm)
  (*end of cterm/ctyp functions*)
  local open Sign.Syntax in
    val add_classes	: (class * class list) list -> theory -> theory
    val add_classrel	: (class * class) list -> theory -> theory
    val add_defsort	: sort -> theory -> theory
    val add_types	: (string * int * mixfix) list -> theory -> theory
    val add_tyabbrs	: (string * string list * string * mixfix) list
      -> theory -> theory
    val add_tyabbrs_i	: (string * string list * typ * mixfix) list
      -> theory -> theory
    val add_arities	: (string * sort list * sort) list -> theory -> theory
    val add_consts	: (string * string * mixfix) list -> theory -> theory
    val add_consts_i	: (string * typ * mixfix) list -> theory -> theory
    val add_syntax	: (string * string * mixfix) list -> theory -> theory
    val add_syntax_i	: (string * typ * mixfix) list -> theory -> theory
    val add_trfuns	:
      (string * (ast list -> ast)) list *
      (string * (term list -> term)) list *
      (string * (term list -> term)) list *
      (string * (ast list -> ast)) list -> theory -> theory
    val add_trrules	: xrule list -> theory -> theory
    val add_axioms	: (string * string) list -> theory -> theory
    val add_axioms_i	: (string * term) list -> theory -> theory
    val add_thyname	: string -> theory -> theory
  end
  val cert_axm		: Sign.sg -> string * term -> string * term
  val read_axm		: Sign.sg -> string * string -> string * term
  val inferT_axm	: Sign.sg -> string * term -> string * term
  val abstract_rule	: string -> cterm -> thm -> thm
  val add_congs		: meta_simpset * thm list -> meta_simpset
  val add_prems		: meta_simpset * thm list -> meta_simpset
  val add_simps		: meta_simpset * thm list -> meta_simpset
  val assume		: cterm -> thm
  val assumption	: int -> thm -> thm Sequence.seq
  val axioms_of		: theory -> (string * thm) list
  val beta_conversion	: cterm -> thm
  val bicompose		: bool -> bool * thm * int -> int -> thm -> 
                          thm Sequence.seq
  val biresolution	: bool -> (bool*thm)list -> int -> thm -> 
                          thm Sequence.seq
  val combination	: thm -> thm -> thm
  val concl_of		: thm -> term
  val cprop_of		: thm -> cterm
  val del_simps		: meta_simpset * thm list -> meta_simpset
  val dest_cimplies	: cterm -> cterm*cterm
  val dest_state	: thm*int -> (term*term)list * term list * term * term
  val empty_mss		: meta_simpset
  val eq_assumption	: int -> thm -> thm
  val equal_intr	: thm -> thm -> thm
  val equal_elim	: thm -> thm -> thm
  val extensional	: thm -> thm
  val flexflex_rule	: thm -> thm Sequence.seq
  val flexpair_def	: thm
  val forall_elim	: cterm -> thm -> thm
  val forall_intr	: cterm -> thm -> thm
  val freezeT		: thm -> thm
  val get_axiom		: theory -> string -> thm
  val implies_elim	: thm -> thm -> thm
  val implies_intr	: cterm -> thm -> thm
  val implies_intr_hyps	: thm -> thm
  val instantiate	: (indexname*ctyp)list * (cterm*cterm)list -> 
                          thm -> thm
  val lift_rule		: (thm * int) -> thm -> thm
  val merge_theories	: theory * theory -> theory
  val merge_thy_list	: bool -> theory list -> theory
  val mk_rews_of_mss	: meta_simpset -> thm -> thm list
  val mss_of		: thm list -> meta_simpset
  val nprems_of		: thm -> int
  val parents_of	: theory -> theory list
  val prems_of		: thm -> term list
  val prems_of_mss	: meta_simpset -> thm list
  val pure_thy		: theory
  val read_def_cterm 	:
         Sign.sg * (indexname -> typ option) * (indexname -> sort option) ->
         string * typ -> cterm * (indexname * typ) list
   val reflexive	: cterm -> thm
  val rename_params_rule: string list * int -> thm -> thm
  val rep_thm		: thm -> {prop: term, hyps: term list, 
				  maxidx: int, sign: Sign.sg}
  val rewrite_cterm	: bool*bool -> meta_simpset -> 
      (meta_simpset -> thm -> thm option) -> cterm -> thm
  val set_mk_rews	: meta_simpset * (thm -> thm list) -> meta_simpset
  val rep_theory	: theory -> {sign: Sign.sg, 
				     new_axioms: term Sign.Symtab.table,
				     parents: theory list}
  val subthy		: theory * theory -> bool
  val eq_thy		: theory * theory -> bool
  val sign_of		: theory -> Sign.sg
  val syn_of		: theory -> Sign.Syntax.syntax
  val stamps_of_thm	: thm -> string ref list
  val stamps_of_thy	: theory -> string ref list
  val symmetric		: thm -> thm
  val tpairs_of		: thm -> (term*term)list
  val trace_simp	: bool ref
  val transitive	: thm -> thm -> thm
  val trivial		: cterm -> thm
  val class_triv	: theory -> class -> thm
  val varifyT		: thm -> thm
end;

functor ThmFun (structure Logic: LOGIC and Unify: UNIFY and Pattern: PATTERN
  and Net:NET sharing type Pattern.type_sig = Unify.Sign.Type.type_sig): THM =
struct

structure Sequence = Unify.Sequence;
structure Envir = Unify.Envir;
structure Sign = Unify.Sign;
structure Type = Sign.Type;
structure Syntax = Sign.Syntax;
structure Symtab = Sign.Symtab;


(*** Certified terms and types ***)

(** certified types **)

(*certified typs under a signature*)

datatype ctyp = Ctyp of {sign: Sign.sg, T: typ};

fun rep_ctyp (Ctyp args) = args;
fun typ_of (Ctyp {T, ...}) = T;

fun ctyp_of sign T =
  Ctyp {sign = sign, T = Sign.certify_typ sign T};

fun read_ctyp sign s =
  Ctyp {sign = sign, T = Sign.read_typ (sign, K None) s};



(** certified terms **)

(*certified terms under a signature, with checked typ and maxidx of Vars*)

datatype cterm = Cterm of {sign: Sign.sg, t: term, T: typ, maxidx: int};

fun rep_cterm (Cterm args) = args;
fun term_of (Cterm {t, ...}) = t;

(*create a cterm by checking a "raw" term with respect to a signature*)
fun cterm_of sign tm =
  let val (t, T, maxidx) = Sign.certify_term sign tm
  in Cterm {sign = sign, t = t, T = T, maxidx = maxidx}
  end handle TYPE (msg, _, _)
    => raise TERM ("Term not in signature\n" ^ msg, [tm]);

fun cterm_fun f (Cterm {sign, t, ...}) = cterm_of sign (f t);


(*dest_implies for cterms. Note T=prop below*)
fun dest_cimplies (Cterm{sign, T, maxidx, t=Const("==>", _) $ A $ B}) =
       (Cterm{sign=sign, T=T, maxidx=maxidx, t=A},
        Cterm{sign=sign, T=T, maxidx=maxidx, t=B})
  | dest_cimplies ct = raise TERM ("dest_cimplies", [term_of ct]);



(** read cterms **)   (*exception ERROR*)

(*read term, infer types, certify term*)
fun read_def_cterm (sign, types, sorts) (a, T) =
  let
    val T' = Sign.certify_typ sign T
      handle TYPE (msg, _, _) => error msg;
    val ts = Syntax.read (#syn (Sign.rep_sg sign)) T' a;
    val (_, t', tye) = Sign.infer_types sign types sorts true (ts, T');
    val ct = cterm_of sign t'
      handle TERM (msg, _) => error msg;
  in (ct, tye) end;

fun read_cterm sign = #1 o read_def_cterm (sign, K None, K None);



(*** Meta theorems ***)

datatype thm = Thm of
  {sign: Sign.sg, maxidx: int, hyps: term list, prop: term};

fun rep_thm (Thm args) = args;

(*errors involving theorems*)
exception THM of string * int * thm list;


val sign_of_thm = #sign o rep_thm;
val stamps_of_thm = #stamps o Sign.rep_sg o sign_of_thm;

(*merge signatures of two theorems; raise exception if incompatible*)
fun merge_thm_sgs (th1, th2) =
  Sign.merge (pairself sign_of_thm (th1, th2))
    handle TERM (msg, _) => raise THM (msg, 0, [th1, th2]);


(*maps object-rule to tpairs*)
fun tpairs_of (Thm {prop, ...}) = #1 (Logic.strip_flexpairs prop);

(*maps object-rule to premises*)
fun prems_of (Thm {prop, ...}) =
  Logic.strip_imp_prems (Logic.skip_flexpairs prop);

(*counts premises in a rule*)
fun nprems_of (Thm {prop, ...}) =
  Logic.count_prems (Logic.skip_flexpairs prop, 0);

(*maps object-rule to conclusion*)
fun concl_of (Thm {prop, ...}) = Logic.strip_imp_concl prop;

(*the statement of any thm is a cterm*)
fun cprop_of (Thm {sign, maxidx, hyps, prop}) =
  Cterm {sign = sign, maxidx = maxidx, T = propT, t = prop};



(*** Theories ***)

datatype theory =
  Theory of {
    sign: Sign.sg,
    new_axioms: term Symtab.table,
    parents: theory list};

fun rep_theory (Theory args) = args;

(*errors involving theories*)
exception THEORY of string * theory list;


val sign_of = #sign o rep_theory;
val syn_of = #syn o Sign.rep_sg o sign_of;

(*stamps associated with a theory*)
val stamps_of_thy = #stamps o Sign.rep_sg o sign_of;

(*return the immediate ancestors*)
val parents_of = #parents o rep_theory;


(*compare theories*)
val subthy = Sign.subsig o pairself sign_of;
val eq_thy = Sign.eq_sg o pairself sign_of;


(*look up the named axiom in the theory*)
fun get_axiom theory name =
  let
    fun get_ax [] = raise Match
      | get_ax (Theory {sign, new_axioms, parents} :: thys) =
          (case Symtab.lookup (new_axioms, name) of
            Some t =>
              Thm {sign = sign, maxidx = maxidx_of_term t, hyps = [], prop = t}
          | None => get_ax parents handle Match => get_ax thys);
  in
    get_ax [theory] handle Match
      => raise THEORY ("get_axiom: no axiom " ^ quote name, [theory])
  end;

(*return additional axioms of this theory node*)
fun axioms_of thy =
  map (fn (s, _) => (s, get_axiom thy s))
    (Symtab.dest (#new_axioms (rep_theory thy)));


(* the Pure theory *)

val pure_thy =
  Theory {sign = Sign.pure, new_axioms = Symtab.null, parents = []};



(** extend theory **)

fun err_dup_axms names =
  error ("Duplicate axiom name(s) " ^ commas_quote names);

fun ext_thy (thy as Theory {sign, new_axioms, parents}) sign1 new_axms =
  let
    val draft = Sign.is_draft sign;
    val new_axioms1 =
      Symtab.extend_new (if draft then new_axioms else Symtab.null, new_axms)
        handle Symtab.DUPS names => err_dup_axms names;
    val parents1 = if draft then parents else [thy];
  in
    Theory {sign = sign1, new_axioms = new_axioms1, parents = parents1}
  end;


(* extend signature of a theory *)

fun ext_sg extfun decls (thy as Theory {sign, ...}) =
  ext_thy thy (extfun decls sign) [];

val add_classes   = ext_sg Sign.add_classes;
val add_classrel  = ext_sg Sign.add_classrel;
val add_defsort   = ext_sg Sign.add_defsort;
val add_types     = ext_sg Sign.add_types;
val add_tyabbrs   = ext_sg Sign.add_tyabbrs;
val add_tyabbrs_i = ext_sg Sign.add_tyabbrs_i;
val add_arities   = ext_sg Sign.add_arities;
val add_consts    = ext_sg Sign.add_consts;
val add_consts_i  = ext_sg Sign.add_consts_i;
val add_syntax    = ext_sg Sign.add_syntax;
val add_syntax_i  = ext_sg Sign.add_syntax_i;
val add_trfuns    = ext_sg Sign.add_trfuns;
val add_trrules   = ext_sg Sign.add_trrules;
val add_thyname   = ext_sg Sign.add_name;


(* prepare axioms *)

fun err_in_axm name =
  error ("The error(s) above occurred in axiom " ^ quote name);

fun no_vars tm =
  if null (term_vars tm) andalso null (term_tvars tm) then tm
  else error "Illegal schematic variable(s) in term";

fun cert_axm sg (name, raw_tm) =
  let
    val Cterm {t, T, ...} = cterm_of sg raw_tm
      handle TERM (msg, _) => error msg;
  in
    assert (T = propT) "Term not of type prop";
    (name, no_vars t)
  end
  handle ERROR => err_in_axm name;

fun read_axm sg (name, str) =
  (name, no_vars (term_of (read_cterm sg (str, propT))))
    handle ERROR => err_in_axm name;

fun inferT_axm sg (name, pre_tm) =
 (name, no_vars (#2 (Sign.infer_types sg (K None) (K None) true ([pre_tm], propT))))
    handle ERROR => err_in_axm name;


(* extend axioms of a theory *)

fun ext_axms prep_axm axms (thy as Theory {sign, ...}) =
  let
    val sign1 = Sign.make_draft sign;
    val axioms = map (apsnd Logic.varify o prep_axm sign) axms;
  in
    ext_thy thy sign1 axioms
  end;

val add_axioms = ext_axms read_axm;
val add_axioms_i = ext_axms cert_axm;



(** merge theories **)

fun merge_thy_list mk_draft thys =
  let
    fun is_union thy = forall (fn t => subthy (t, thy)) thys;
    val is_draft = Sign.is_draft o sign_of;

    fun add_sign (sg, Theory {sign, ...}) =
      Sign.merge (sg, sign) handle TERM (msg, _) => error msg;
  in
    (case (find_first is_union thys, exists is_draft thys) of
      (Some thy, _) => thy
    | (None, true) => raise THEORY ("Illegal merge of draft theories", thys)
    | (None, false) => Theory {
        sign =
          (if mk_draft then Sign.make_draft else I)
          (foldl add_sign (Sign.pure, thys)),
        new_axioms = Symtab.null,
        parents = thys})
  end;

fun merge_theories (thy1, thy2) = merge_thy_list false [thy1, thy2];



(**** Primitive rules ****)

(* discharge all assumptions t from ts *)
val disch = gen_rem (op aconv);

(*The assumption rule A|-A in a theory  *)
fun assume ct : thm =
  let val {sign, t=prop, T, maxidx} = rep_cterm ct
  in  if T<>propT then
        raise THM("assume: assumptions must have type prop", 0, [])
      else if maxidx <> ~1 then
        raise THM("assume: assumptions may not contain scheme variables",
                  maxidx, [])
      else Thm{sign = sign, maxidx = ~1, hyps = [prop], prop = prop}
  end;

(* Implication introduction
              A |- B
              -------
              A ==> B    *)
fun implies_intr cA (thB as Thm{sign,maxidx,hyps,prop}) : thm =
  let val {sign=signA, t=A, T, maxidx=maxidxA} = rep_cterm cA
  in  if T<>propT then
        raise THM("implies_intr: assumptions must have type prop", 0, [thB])
      else Thm{sign= Sign.merge (sign,signA),  maxidx= max[maxidxA, maxidx],
             hyps= disch(hyps,A),  prop= implies$A$prop}
      handle TERM _ =>
        raise THM("implies_intr: incompatible signatures", 0, [thB])
  end;

(* Implication elimination
        A ==> B       A
        ---------------
                B      *)
fun implies_elim thAB thA : thm =
    let val Thm{maxidx=maxA, hyps=hypsA, prop=propA,...} = thA
        and Thm{sign, maxidx, hyps, prop,...} = thAB;
        fun err(a) = raise THM("implies_elim: "^a, 0, [thAB,thA])
    in  case prop of
            imp$A$B =>
                if imp=implies andalso  A aconv propA
                then  Thm{sign= merge_thm_sgs(thAB,thA),
                          maxidx= max[maxA,maxidx],
                          hyps= hypsA union hyps,  (*dups suppressed*)
                          prop= B}
                else err("major premise")
          | _ => err("major premise")
    end;

(* Forall introduction.  The Free or Var x must not be free in the hypotheses.
     A
   ------
   !!x.A       *)
fun forall_intr cx (th as Thm{sign,maxidx,hyps,prop}) =
  let val x = term_of cx;
      fun result(a,T) = Thm{sign= sign, maxidx= maxidx, hyps= hyps,
                            prop= all(T) $ Abs(a, T, abstract_over (x,prop))}
  in  case x of
        Free(a,T) =>
          if exists (apl(x, Logic.occs)) hyps
          then  raise THM("forall_intr: variable free in assumptions", 0, [th])
          else  result(a,T)
      | Var((a,_),T) => result(a,T)
      | _ => raise THM("forall_intr: not a variable", 0, [th])
  end;

(* Forall elimination
              !!x.A
             --------
              A[t/x]     *)
fun forall_elim ct (th as Thm{sign,maxidx,hyps,prop}) : thm =
  let val {sign=signt, t, T, maxidx=maxt} = rep_cterm ct
  in  case prop of
          Const("all",Type("fun",[Type("fun",[qary,_]),_])) $ A =>
            if T<>qary then
                raise THM("forall_elim: type mismatch", 0, [th])
            else Thm{sign= Sign.merge(sign,signt),
                     maxidx= max[maxidx, maxt],
                     hyps= hyps,  prop= betapply(A,t)}
        | _ => raise THM("forall_elim: not quantified", 0, [th])
  end
  handle TERM _ =>
         raise THM("forall_elim: incompatible signatures", 0, [th]);


(*** Equality ***)

(*Definition of the relation =?= *)
val flexpair_def =
  Thm{sign= Sign.pure, hyps= [], maxidx= 0,
      prop= term_of
              (read_cterm Sign.pure
                 ("(?t =?= ?u) == (?t == ?u::?'a::{})", propT))};

(*The reflexivity rule: maps  t   to the theorem   t==t   *)
fun reflexive ct =
  let val {sign, t, T, maxidx} = rep_cterm ct
  in  Thm{sign= sign, hyps= [], maxidx= maxidx, prop= Logic.mk_equals(t,t)}
  end;

(*The symmetry rule
    t==u
    ----
    u==t         *)
fun symmetric (th as Thm{sign,hyps,prop,maxidx}) =
  case prop of
      (eq as Const("==",_)) $ t $ u =>
          Thm{sign=sign, hyps=hyps, maxidx=maxidx, prop= eq$u$t}
    | _ => raise THM("symmetric", 0, [th]);

(*The transitive rule
    t1==u    u==t2
    ------------
        t1==t2      *)
fun transitive th1 th2 =
  let val Thm{maxidx=max1, hyps=hyps1, prop=prop1,...} = th1
      and Thm{maxidx=max2, hyps=hyps2, prop=prop2,...} = th2;
      fun err(msg) = raise THM("transitive: "^msg, 0, [th1,th2])
  in case (prop1,prop2) of
       ((eq as Const("==",_)) $ t1 $ u, Const("==",_) $ u' $ t2) =>
          if not (u aconv u') then err"middle term"  else
              Thm{sign= merge_thm_sgs(th1,th2), hyps= hyps1 union hyps2,
                  maxidx= max[max1,max2], prop= eq$t1$t2}
     | _ =>  err"premises"
  end;

(*Beta-conversion: maps (%(x)t)(u) to the theorem  (%(x)t)(u) == t[u/x]   *)
fun beta_conversion ct =
  let val {sign, t, T, maxidx} = rep_cterm ct
  in  case t of
          Abs(_,_,bodt) $ u =>
            Thm{sign= sign,  hyps= [],
                maxidx= maxidx_of_term t,
                prop= Logic.mk_equals(t, subst_bounds([u],bodt))}
        | _ =>  raise THM("beta_conversion: not a redex", 0, [])
  end;

(*The extensionality rule   (proviso: x not free in f, g, or hypotheses)
    f(x) == g(x)
    ------------
       f == g    *)
fun extensional (th as Thm{sign,maxidx,hyps,prop}) =
  case prop of
    (Const("==",_)) $ (f$x) $ (g$y) =>
      let fun err(msg) = raise THM("extensional: "^msg, 0, [th])
      in (if x<>y then err"different variables" else
          case y of
                Free _ =>
                  if exists (apl(y, Logic.occs)) (f::g::hyps)
                  then err"variable free in hyps or functions"    else  ()
              | Var _ =>
                  if Logic.occs(y,f)  orelse  Logic.occs(y,g)
                  then err"variable free in functions"   else  ()
              | _ => err"not a variable");
          Thm{sign=sign, hyps=hyps, maxidx=maxidx,
              prop= Logic.mk_equals(f,g)}
      end
 | _ =>  raise THM("extensional: premise", 0, [th]);

(*The abstraction rule.  The Free or Var x must not be free in the hypotheses.
  The bound variable will be named "a" (since x will be something like x320)
          t == u
    ----------------
      %(x)t == %(x)u     *)
fun abstract_rule a cx (th as Thm{sign,maxidx,hyps,prop}) =
  let val x = term_of cx;
      val (t,u) = Logic.dest_equals prop
            handle TERM _ =>
                raise THM("abstract_rule: premise not an equality", 0, [th])
      fun result T =
            Thm{sign= sign, maxidx= maxidx, hyps= hyps,
                prop= Logic.mk_equals(Abs(a, T, abstract_over (x,t)),
                                      Abs(a, T, abstract_over (x,u)))}
  in  case x of
        Free(_,T) =>
         if exists (apl(x, Logic.occs)) hyps
         then raise THM("abstract_rule: variable free in assumptions", 0, [th])
         else result T
      | Var(_,T) => result T
      | _ => raise THM("abstract_rule: not a variable", 0, [th])
  end;

(*The combination rule
    f==g    t==u
    ------------
     f(t)==g(u)      *)
fun combination th1 th2 =
  let val Thm{maxidx=max1, hyps=hyps1, prop=prop1,...} = th1
      and Thm{maxidx=max2, hyps=hyps2, prop=prop2,...} = th2
  in  case (prop1,prop2)  of
       (Const("==",_) $ f $ g, Const("==",_) $ t $ u) =>
              Thm{sign= merge_thm_sgs(th1,th2), hyps= hyps1 union hyps2,
                  maxidx= max[max1,max2], prop= Logic.mk_equals(f$t, g$u)}
     | _ =>  raise THM("combination: premises", 0, [th1,th2])
  end;


(*The equal propositions rule
    A==B    A
    ---------
        B          *)
fun equal_elim th1 th2 =
  let val Thm{maxidx=max1, hyps=hyps1, prop=prop1,...} = th1
      and Thm{maxidx=max2, hyps=hyps2, prop=prop2,...} = th2;
      fun err(msg) = raise THM("equal_elim: "^msg, 0, [th1,th2])
  in  case prop1  of
       Const("==",_) $ A $ B =>
          if not (prop2 aconv A) then err"not equal"  else
              Thm{sign= merge_thm_sgs(th1,th2), hyps= hyps1 union hyps2,
                  maxidx= max[max1,max2], prop= B}
     | _ =>  err"major premise"
  end;


(* Equality introduction
    A==>B    B==>A
    -------------
         A==B            *)
fun equal_intr th1 th2 =
let val Thm{maxidx=max1, hyps=hyps1, prop=prop1,...} = th1
    and Thm{maxidx=max2, hyps=hyps2, prop=prop2,...} = th2;
    fun err(msg) = raise THM("equal_intr: "^msg, 0, [th1,th2])
in case (prop1,prop2) of
     (Const("==>",_) $ A $ B, Const("==>",_) $ B' $ A')  =>
        if A aconv A' andalso B aconv B'
        then Thm{sign= merge_thm_sgs(th1,th2), hyps= hyps1 union hyps2,
                 maxidx= max[max1,max2], prop= Logic.mk_equals(A,B)}
        else err"not equal"
   | _ =>  err"premises"
end;

(**** Derived rules ****)

(*Discharge all hypotheses (need not verify cterms)
  Repeated hypotheses are discharged only once;  fold cannot do this*)
fun implies_intr_hyps (Thm{sign, maxidx, hyps=A::As, prop}) =
      implies_intr_hyps
            (Thm{sign=sign,  maxidx=maxidx,
                 hyps= disch(As,A),  prop= implies$A$prop})
  | implies_intr_hyps th = th;

(*Smash" unifies the list of term pairs leaving no flex-flex pairs.
  Instantiates the theorem and deletes trivial tpairs.
  Resulting sequence may contain multiple elements if the tpairs are
    not all flex-flex. *)
fun flexflex_rule (Thm{sign,maxidx,hyps,prop}) =
  let fun newthm env =
          let val (tpairs,horn) =
                        Logic.strip_flexpairs (Envir.norm_term env prop)
                (*Remove trivial tpairs, of the form t=t*)
              val distpairs = filter (not o op aconv) tpairs
              val newprop = Logic.list_flexpairs(distpairs, horn)
          in  Thm{sign= sign, hyps= hyps,
                  maxidx= maxidx_of_term newprop, prop= newprop}
          end;
      val (tpairs,_) = Logic.strip_flexpairs prop
  in Sequence.maps newthm
            (Unify.smash_unifiers(sign, Envir.empty maxidx, tpairs))
  end;

(*Instantiation of Vars
                      A
             --------------------
              A[t1/v1,....,tn/vn]     *)

(*Check that all the terms are Vars and are distinct*)
fun instl_ok ts = forall is_Var ts andalso null(findrep ts);

(*For instantiate: process pair of cterms, merge theories*)
fun add_ctpair ((ct,cu), (sign,tpairs)) =
  let val {sign=signt, t=t, T= T, ...} = rep_cterm ct
      and {sign=signu, t=u, T= U, ...} = rep_cterm cu
  in  if T=U  then (Sign.merge(sign, Sign.merge(signt, signu)), (t,u)::tpairs)
      else raise TYPE("add_ctpair", [T,U], [t,u])
  end;

fun add_ctyp ((v,ctyp), (sign',vTs)) =
  let val {T,sign} = rep_ctyp ctyp
  in (Sign.merge(sign,sign'), (v,T)::vTs) end;

(*Left-to-right replacements: ctpairs = [...,(vi,ti),...].
  Instantiates distinct Vars by terms of same type.
  Normalizes the new theorem! *)
fun instantiate (vcTs,ctpairs)  (th as Thm{sign,maxidx,hyps,prop}) =
  let val (newsign,tpairs) = foldr add_ctpair (ctpairs, (sign,[]));
      val (newsign,vTs) = foldr add_ctyp (vcTs, (newsign,[]));
      val newprop =
            Envir.norm_term (Envir.empty 0)
              (subst_atomic tpairs
               (Type.inst_term_tvars(#tsig(Sign.rep_sg newsign),vTs) prop))
      val newth = Thm{sign= newsign, hyps= hyps,
                      maxidx= maxidx_of_term newprop, prop= newprop}
  in  if not(instl_ok(map #1 tpairs))
      then raise THM("instantiate: variables not distinct", 0, [th])
      else if not(null(findrep(map #1 vTs)))
      then raise THM("instantiate: type variables not distinct", 0, [th])
      else (*Check types of Vars for agreement*)
      case findrep (map (#1 o dest_Var) (term_vars newprop)) of
          ix::_ => raise THM("instantiate: conflicting types for variable " ^
                             Syntax.string_of_vname ix ^ "\n", 0, [newth])
        | [] =>
             case findrep (map #1 (term_tvars newprop)) of
             ix::_ => raise THM
                    ("instantiate: conflicting sorts for type variable " ^
                     Syntax.string_of_vname ix ^ "\n", 0, [newth])
        | [] => newth
  end
  handle TERM _ =>
           raise THM("instantiate: incompatible signatures",0,[th])
       | TYPE _ => raise THM("instantiate: type conflict", 0, [th]);

(*The trivial implication A==>A, justified by assume and forall rules.
  A can contain Vars, not so for assume!   *)
fun trivial ct : thm =
  let val {sign, t=A, T, maxidx} = rep_cterm ct
  in  if T<>propT then
            raise THM("trivial: the term must have type prop", 0, [])
      else Thm{sign= sign, maxidx= maxidx, hyps= [], prop= implies$A$A}
  end;

(*Axiom-scheme reflecting signature contents: "OFCLASS(?'a::c, c_class)".
  Is weaker than some definition of c_class, e.g. "c_class == %x.T";
  may be interpreted as an instance of A==>A.*)
fun class_triv thy c =
  let
    val sign = sign_of thy;
    val Cterm {t, maxidx, ...} =
      cterm_of sign (Logic.mk_inclass (TVar (("'a", 0), [c]), c))
        handle TERM (msg, _) => raise THM ("class_triv: " ^ msg, 0, []);
  in
    Thm {sign = sign, maxidx = maxidx, hyps = [], prop = t}
  end;


(* Replace all TFrees not in the hyps by new TVars *)
fun varifyT(Thm{sign,maxidx,hyps,prop}) =
  let val tfrees = foldr add_term_tfree_names (hyps,[])
  in Thm{sign=sign, maxidx=max[0,maxidx], hyps=hyps,
         prop= Type.varify(prop,tfrees)}
  end;

(* Replace all TVars by new TFrees *)
fun freezeT(Thm{sign,maxidx,hyps,prop}) =
  let val prop' = Type.freeze (K true) prop
  in Thm{sign=sign, maxidx=maxidx_of_term prop', hyps=hyps, prop=prop'} end;


(*** Inference rules for tactics ***)

(*Destruct proof state into constraints, other goals, goal(i), rest *)
fun dest_state (state as Thm{prop,...}, i) =
  let val (tpairs,horn) = Logic.strip_flexpairs prop
  in  case  Logic.strip_prems(i, [], horn) of
          (B::rBs, C) => (tpairs, rev rBs, B, C)
        | _ => raise THM("dest_state", i, [state])
  end
  handle TERM _ => raise THM("dest_state", i, [state]);

(*Increment variables and parameters of orule as required for
  resolution with goal i of state. *)
fun lift_rule (state, i) orule =
  let val Thm{prop=sprop,maxidx=smax,...} = state;
      val (Bi::_, _) = Logic.strip_prems(i, [], Logic.skip_flexpairs sprop)
        handle TERM _ => raise THM("lift_rule", i, [orule,state]);
      val (lift_abs,lift_all) = Logic.lift_fns(Bi,smax+1);
      val (Thm{sign,maxidx,hyps,prop}) = orule
      val (tpairs,As,B) = Logic.strip_horn prop
  in  Thm{hyps=hyps, sign= merge_thm_sgs(state,orule),
          maxidx= maxidx+smax+1,
          prop= Logic.rule_of(map (pairself lift_abs) tpairs,
                              map lift_all As,    lift_all B)}
  end;

(*Solve subgoal Bi of proof state B1...Bn/C by assumption. *)
fun assumption i state =
  let val Thm{sign,maxidx,hyps,prop} = state;
      val (tpairs, Bs, Bi, C) = dest_state(state,i)
      fun newth (env as Envir.Envir{maxidx, ...}, tpairs) =
          Thm{sign=sign, hyps=hyps, maxidx=maxidx, prop=
            if Envir.is_empty env then (*avoid wasted normalizations*)
              Logic.rule_of (tpairs, Bs, C)
            else (*normalize the new rule fully*)
              Envir.norm_term env (Logic.rule_of (tpairs, Bs, C))};
      fun addprfs [] = Sequence.null
        | addprfs ((t,u)::apairs) = Sequence.seqof (fn()=> Sequence.pull
             (Sequence.mapp newth
                (Unify.unifiers(sign,Envir.empty maxidx, (t,u)::tpairs))
                (addprfs apairs)))
  in  addprfs (Logic.assum_pairs Bi)  end;

(*Solve subgoal Bi of proof state B1...Bn/C by assumption.
  Checks if Bi's conclusion is alpha-convertible to one of its assumptions*)
fun eq_assumption i state =
  let val Thm{sign,maxidx,hyps,prop} = state;
      val (tpairs, Bs, Bi, C) = dest_state(state,i)
  in  if exists (op aconv) (Logic.assum_pairs Bi)
      then Thm{sign=sign, hyps=hyps, maxidx=maxidx,
               prop=Logic.rule_of(tpairs, Bs, C)}
      else  raise THM("eq_assumption", 0, [state])
  end;


(** User renaming of parameters in a subgoal **)

(*Calls error rather than raising an exception because it is intended
  for top-level use -- exception handling would not make sense here.
  The names in cs, if distinct, are used for the innermost parameters;
   preceding parameters may be renamed to make all params distinct.*)
fun rename_params_rule (cs, i) state =
  let val Thm{sign,maxidx,hyps,prop} = state
      val (tpairs, Bs, Bi, C) = dest_state(state,i)
      val iparams = map #1 (Logic.strip_params Bi)
      val short = length iparams - length cs
      val newnames =
            if short<0 then error"More names than abstractions!"
            else variantlist(take (short,iparams), cs) @ cs
      val freenames = map (#1 o dest_Free) (term_frees prop)
      val newBi = Logic.list_rename_params (newnames, Bi)
  in
  case findrep cs of
     c::_ => error ("Bound variables not distinct: " ^ c)
   | [] => (case cs inter freenames of
       a::_ => error ("Bound/Free variable clash: " ^ a)
     | [] => Thm{sign=sign, hyps=hyps, maxidx=maxidx, prop=
                    Logic.rule_of(tpairs, Bs@[newBi], C)})
  end;

(*** Preservation of bound variable names ***)

(*Scan a pair of terms; while they are similar,
  accumulate corresponding bound vars in "al"*)
fun match_bvs(Abs(x,_,s),Abs(y,_,t), al) = match_bvs(s,t,(x,y)::al)
  | match_bvs(f$s, g$t, al) = match_bvs(f,g,match_bvs(s,t,al))
  | match_bvs(_,_,al) = al;

(* strip abstractions created by parameters *)
fun match_bvars((s,t),al) = match_bvs(strip_abs_body s, strip_abs_body t, al);


(* strip_apply f A(,B) strips off all assumptions/parameters from A
   introduced by lifting over B, and applies f to remaining part of A*)
fun strip_apply f =
  let fun strip(Const("==>",_)$ A1 $ B1,
                Const("==>",_)$ _  $ B2) = implies $ A1 $ strip(B1,B2)
        | strip((c as Const("all",_)) $ Abs(a,T,t1),
                      Const("all",_)  $ Abs(_,_,t2)) = c$Abs(a,T,strip(t1,t2))
        | strip(A,_) = f A
  in strip end;

(*Use the alist to rename all bound variables and some unknowns in a term
  dpairs = current disagreement pairs;  tpairs = permanent ones (flexflex);
  Preserves unknowns in tpairs and on lhs of dpairs. *)
fun rename_bvs([],_,_,_) = I
  | rename_bvs(al,dpairs,tpairs,B) =
    let val vars = foldr add_term_vars
                        (map fst dpairs @ map fst tpairs @ map snd tpairs, [])
        (*unknowns appearing elsewhere be preserved!*)
        val vids = map (#1 o #1 o dest_Var) vars;
        fun rename(t as Var((x,i),T)) =
                (case assoc(al,x) of
                   Some(y) => if x mem vids orelse y mem vids then t
                              else Var((y,i),T)
                 | None=> t)
          | rename(Abs(x,T,t)) =
              Abs(case assoc(al,x) of Some(y) => y | None => x,
                  T, rename t)
          | rename(f$t) = rename f $ rename t
          | rename(t) = t;
        fun strip_ren Ai = strip_apply rename (Ai,B)
    in strip_ren end;

(*Function to rename bounds/unknowns in the argument, lifted over B*)
fun rename_bvars(dpairs, tpairs, B) =
        rename_bvs(foldr match_bvars (dpairs,[]), dpairs, tpairs, B);


(*** RESOLUTION ***)

(** Lifting optimizations **)

(*strip off pairs of assumptions/parameters in parallel -- they are
  identical because of lifting*)
fun strip_assums2 (Const("==>", _) $ _ $ B1,
                   Const("==>", _) $ _ $ B2) = strip_assums2 (B1,B2)
  | strip_assums2 (Const("all",_)$Abs(a,T,t1),
                   Const("all",_)$Abs(_,_,t2)) =
      let val (B1,B2) = strip_assums2 (t1,t2)
      in  (Abs(a,T,B1), Abs(a,T,B2))  end
  | strip_assums2 BB = BB;


(*Faster normalization: skip assumptions that were lifted over*)
fun norm_term_skip env 0 t = Envir.norm_term env t
  | norm_term_skip env n (Const("all",_)$Abs(a,T,t)) =
        let val Envir.Envir{iTs, ...} = env
	    val T' = typ_subst_TVars iTs T
	    (*Must instantiate types of parameters because they are flattened;
              this could be a NEW parameter*)
        in  all T' $ Abs(a, T', norm_term_skip env n t)  end
  | norm_term_skip env n (Const("==>", _) $ A $ B) =
	implies $ A $ norm_term_skip env (n-1) B
  | norm_term_skip env n t = error"norm_term_skip: too few assumptions??";


(*Composition of object rule r=(A1...Am/B) with proof state s=(B1...Bn/C)
  Unifies B with Bi, replacing subgoal i    (1 <= i <= n)
  If match then forbid instantiations in proof state
  If lifted then shorten the dpair using strip_assums2.
  If eres_flg then simultaneously proves A1 by assumption.
  nsubgoal is the number of new subgoals (written m above).
  Curried so that resolution calls dest_state only once.
*)
local open Sequence; exception Bicompose
in
fun bicompose_aux match (state, (stpairs, Bs, Bi, C), lifted)
                        (eres_flg, orule, nsubgoal) =
 let val Thm{maxidx=smax, hyps=shyps, ...} = state
     and Thm{maxidx=rmax, hyps=rhyps, prop=rprop,...} = orule
	     (*How many hyps to skip over during normalization*)
     and nlift = Logic.count_prems(strip_all_body Bi, 
				   if eres_flg then ~1 else 0)
     val sign = merge_thm_sgs(state,orule);
     (** Add new theorem with prop = '[| Bs; As |] ==> C' to thq **)
     fun addth As ((env as Envir.Envir {maxidx, ...}, tpairs), thq) =
       let val normt = Envir.norm_term env;
           (*perform minimal copying here by examining env*)
           val normp =
             if Envir.is_empty env then (tpairs, Bs @ As, C)
             else
             let val ntps = map (pairself normt) tpairs
             in if the (Envir.minidx env) > smax then 
		  (*no assignments in state; normalize the rule only*)
                  if lifted 
		  then (ntps, Bs @ map (norm_term_skip env nlift) As, C)
		  else (ntps, Bs @ map normt As, C)
                else if match then raise Bicompose
                else (*normalize the new rule fully*)
                  (ntps, map normt (Bs @ As), normt C)
             end
           val th = Thm{sign=sign, hyps=rhyps union shyps, maxidx=maxidx,
                        prop= Logic.rule_of normp}
        in  cons(th, thq)  end  handle Bicompose => thq
     val (rtpairs,rhorn) = Logic.strip_flexpairs(rprop);
     val (rAs,B) = Logic.strip_prems(nsubgoal, [], rhorn)
       handle TERM _ => raise THM("bicompose: rule", 0, [orule,state]);
     (*Modify assumptions, deleting n-th if n>0 for e-resolution*)
     fun newAs(As0, n, dpairs, tpairs) =
       let val As1 = if !Logic.auto_rename orelse not lifted then As0
                     else map (rename_bvars(dpairs,tpairs,B)) As0
       in (map (Logic.flatten_params n) As1)
          handle TERM _ =>
          raise THM("bicompose: 1st premise", 0, [orule])
       end;
     val env = Envir.empty(max[rmax,smax]);
     val BBi = if lifted then strip_assums2(B,Bi) else (B,Bi);
     val dpairs = BBi :: (rtpairs@stpairs);
     (*elim-resolution: try each assumption in turn.  Initially n=1*)
     fun tryasms (_, _, []) = null
       | tryasms (As, n, (t,u)::apairs) =
          (case pull(Unify.unifiers(sign, env, (t,u)::dpairs))  of
               None                   => tryasms (As, n+1, apairs)
             | cell as Some((_,tpairs),_) =>
                   its_right (addth (newAs(As, n, [BBi,(u,t)], tpairs)))
                       (seqof (fn()=> cell),
                        seqof (fn()=> pull (tryasms (As, n+1, apairs)))));
     fun eres [] = raise THM("bicompose: no premises", 0, [orule,state])
       | eres (A1::As) = tryasms (As, 1, Logic.assum_pairs A1);
     (*ordinary resolution*)
     fun res(None) = null
       | res(cell as Some((_,tpairs),_)) =
             its_right (addth(newAs(rev rAs, 0, [BBi], tpairs)))
                       (seqof (fn()=> cell), null)
 in  if eres_flg then eres(rev rAs)
     else res(pull(Unify.unifiers(sign, env, dpairs)))
 end;
end;  (*open Sequence*)


fun bicompose match arg i state =
    bicompose_aux match (state, dest_state(state,i), false) arg;

(*Quick test whether rule is resolvable with the subgoal with hyps Hs
  and conclusion B.  If eres_flg then checks 1st premise of rule also*)
fun could_bires (Hs, B, eres_flg, rule) =
    let fun could_reshyp (A1::_) = exists (apl(A1,could_unify)) Hs
          | could_reshyp [] = false;  (*no premise -- illegal*)
    in  could_unify(concl_of rule, B) andalso
        (not eres_flg  orelse  could_reshyp (prems_of rule))
    end;

(*Bi-resolution of a state with a list of (flag,rule) pairs.
  Puts the rule above:  rule/state.  Renames vars in the rules. *)
fun biresolution match brules i state =
    let val lift = lift_rule(state, i);
        val (stpairs, Bs, Bi, C) = dest_state(state,i)
        val B = Logic.strip_assums_concl Bi;
        val Hs = Logic.strip_assums_hyp Bi;
        val comp = bicompose_aux match (state, (stpairs, Bs, Bi, C), true);
        fun res [] = Sequence.null
          | res ((eres_flg, rule)::brules) =
              if could_bires (Hs, B, eres_flg, rule)
              then Sequence.seqof (*delay processing remainder til needed*)
                  (fn()=> Some(comp (eres_flg, lift rule, nprems_of rule),
                               res brules))
              else res brules
    in  Sequence.flats (res brules)  end;



(*** Meta simp sets ***)

type rrule = {thm:thm, lhs:term, perm:bool};
type cong = {thm:thm, lhs:term};
datatype meta_simpset =
  Mss of {net:rrule Net.net, congs:(string * cong)list, bounds:string list,
          prems: thm list, mk_rews: thm -> thm list};

(*A "mss" contains data needed during conversion:
  net: discrimination net of rewrite rules
  congs: association list of congruence rules
  bounds: names of bound variables already used;
          for generating new names when rewriting under lambda abstractions
  mk_rews: used when local assumptions are added
*)

val empty_mss = Mss{net= Net.empty, congs= [], bounds=[], prems= [],
                    mk_rews = K[]};

exception SIMPLIFIER of string * thm;

fun prtm a sign t = (writeln a; writeln(Sign.string_of_term sign t));

val trace_simp = ref false;

fun trace_term a sign t = if !trace_simp then prtm a sign t else ();

fun trace_thm a (Thm{sign,prop,...}) = trace_term a sign prop;

fun vperm(Var _, Var _) = true
  | vperm(Abs(_,_,s), Abs(_,_,t)) = vperm(s,t)
  | vperm(t1$t2, u1$u2) = vperm(t1,u1) andalso vperm(t2,u2)
  | vperm(t,u) = (t=u);

fun var_perm(t,u) = vperm(t,u) andalso
                    eq_set(add_term_vars(t,[]), add_term_vars(u,[]))

(*simple test for looping rewrite*)
fun loops sign prems (lhs,rhs) =
  is_Var(lhs) orelse
  (is_Free(lhs) andalso (lhs mem (foldr add_term_frees (rhs::prems,[])))) orelse
  (null(prems) andalso
   Pattern.matches (#tsig(Sign.rep_sg sign)) (lhs,rhs));

fun mk_rrule (thm as Thm{hyps,sign,prop,maxidx,...}) =
  let val prems = Logic.strip_imp_prems prop
      val concl = Logic.strip_imp_concl prop
      val (lhs,_) = Logic.dest_equals concl handle TERM _ =>
                      raise SIMPLIFIER("Rewrite rule not a meta-equality",thm)
      val econcl = Pattern.eta_contract concl
      val (elhs,erhs) = Logic.dest_equals econcl
      val perm = var_perm(elhs,erhs) andalso not(elhs aconv erhs)
                                     andalso not(is_Var(elhs))
  in if not perm andalso loops sign prems (elhs,erhs)
     then (prtm "Warning: ignoring looping rewrite rule" sign prop; None)
     else Some{thm=thm,lhs=lhs,perm=perm}
  end;

local
 fun eq({thm=Thm{prop=p1,...},...}:rrule,
        {thm=Thm{prop=p2,...},...}:rrule) = p1 aconv p2
in

fun add_simp(mss as Mss{net,congs,bounds,prems,mk_rews},
             thm as Thm{sign,prop,...}) =
  case mk_rrule thm of
    None => mss
  | Some(rrule as {lhs,...}) =>
      (trace_thm "Adding rewrite rule:" thm;
       Mss{net= (Net.insert_term((lhs,rrule),net,eq)
                 handle Net.INSERT =>
                  (prtm "Warning: ignoring duplicate rewrite rule" sign prop;
                   net)),
           congs=congs, bounds=bounds, prems=prems,mk_rews=mk_rews});

fun del_simp(mss as Mss{net,congs,bounds,prems,mk_rews},
             thm as Thm{sign,prop,...}) =
  case mk_rrule thm of
    None => mss
  | Some(rrule as {lhs,...}) =>
      Mss{net= (Net.delete_term((lhs,rrule),net,eq)
                handle Net.INSERT =>
                 (prtm "Warning: rewrite rule not in simpset" sign prop;
                  net)),
             congs=congs, bounds=bounds, prems=prems,mk_rews=mk_rews}

end;

val add_simps = foldl add_simp;
val del_simps = foldl del_simp;

fun mss_of thms = add_simps(empty_mss,thms);

fun add_cong(Mss{net,congs,bounds,prems,mk_rews},thm) =
  let val (lhs,_) = Logic.dest_equals(concl_of thm) handle TERM _ =>
                    raise SIMPLIFIER("Congruence not a meta-equality",thm)
(*      val lhs = Pattern.eta_contract lhs*)
      val (a,_) = dest_Const (head_of lhs) handle TERM _ =>
                  raise SIMPLIFIER("Congruence must start with a constant",thm)
  in Mss{net=net, congs=(a,{lhs=lhs,thm=thm})::congs, bounds=bounds,
         prems=prems, mk_rews=mk_rews}
  end;

val (op add_congs) = foldl add_cong;

fun add_prems(Mss{net,congs,bounds,prems,mk_rews},thms) =
  Mss{net=net, congs=congs, bounds=bounds, prems=thms@prems, mk_rews=mk_rews};

fun prems_of_mss(Mss{prems,...}) = prems;

fun set_mk_rews(Mss{net,congs,bounds,prems,...},mk_rews) =
  Mss{net=net, congs=congs, bounds=bounds, prems=prems, mk_rews=mk_rews};
fun mk_rews_of_mss(Mss{mk_rews,...}) = mk_rews;


(*** Meta-level rewriting
     uses conversions, omitting proofs for efficiency.  See
        L C Paulson, A higher-order implementation of rewriting,
        Science of Computer Programming 3 (1983), pages 119-149. ***)

type prover = meta_simpset -> thm -> thm option;
type termrec = (Sign.sg * term list) * term;
type conv = meta_simpset -> termrec -> termrec;

datatype order = LESS | EQUAL | GREATER;

fun stringord(a,b:string) = if a<b then LESS  else
                            if a=b then EQUAL else GREATER;

fun intord(i,j:int) = if i<j then LESS  else
                      if i=j then EQUAL else GREATER;

(* NB: non-linearity of the ordering is not a soundness problem *)

(* FIXME: "***ABSTRACTION***" is a hack and makes the ordering non-linear *)
fun string_of_hd(Const(a,_)) = a
  | string_of_hd(Free(a,_))  = a
  | string_of_hd(Var(v,_))   = Syntax.string_of_vname v
  | string_of_hd(Bound i)    = string_of_int i
  | string_of_hd(Abs _)      = "***ABSTRACTION***";

(* a strict (not reflexive) linear well-founded AC-compatible ordering
 * for terms:
 * s < t <=> 1. size(s) < size(t) or
             2. size(s) = size(t) and s=f(...) and t = g(...) and f<g or
             3. size(s) = size(t) and s=f(s1..sn) and t=f(t1..tn) and
                (s1..sn) < (t1..tn) (lexicographically)
 *)

(* FIXME: should really take types into account as well.
 * Otherwise non-linear *)
fun termord(Abs(_,_,t),Abs(_,_,u)) = termord(t,u)
  | termord(t,u) =
      (case intord(size_of_term t,size_of_term u) of
         EQUAL => let val (f,ts) = strip_comb t and (g,us) = strip_comb u
                  in case stringord(string_of_hd f, string_of_hd g) of
                       EQUAL => lextermord(ts,us)
                     | ord   => ord
                  end
       | ord => ord)
and lextermord(t::ts,u::us) =
      (case termord(t,u) of
         EQUAL => lextermord(ts,us)
       | ord   => ord)
  | lextermord([],[]) = EQUAL
  | lextermord _ = error("lextermord");

fun termless tu = (termord tu = LESS);

fun check_conv(thm as Thm{hyps,prop,sign,...}, prop0) =
  let fun err() = (trace_thm "Proved wrong thm (Check subgoaler?)" thm;
                   trace_term "Should have proved" sign prop0;
                   None)
      val (lhs0,_) = Logic.dest_equals(Logic.strip_imp_concl prop0)
  in case prop of
       Const("==",_) $ lhs $ rhs =>
         if (lhs = lhs0) orelse
            (lhs aconv Envir.norm_term (Envir.empty 0) lhs0)
         then (trace_thm "SUCCEEDED" thm; Some(hyps,rhs))
         else err()
     | _ => err()
  end;

fun ren_inst(insts,prop,pat,obj) =
  let val ren = match_bvs(pat,obj,[])
      fun renAbs(Abs(x,T,b)) =
            Abs(case assoc(ren,x) of None => x | Some(y) => y, T, renAbs(b))
        | renAbs(f$t) = renAbs(f) $ renAbs(t)
        | renAbs(t) = t
  in subst_vars insts (if null(ren) then prop else renAbs(prop)) end;


(*Conversion to apply the meta simpset to a term*)
fun rewritec (prover,signt) (mss as Mss{net,...}) (hypst,t) =
  let val etat = Pattern.eta_contract t;
      fun rew {thm as Thm{sign,hyps,maxidx,prop,...}, lhs, perm} =
        let val unit = if Sign.subsig(sign,signt) then ()
                  else (trace_thm"Warning: rewrite rule from different theory"
                          thm;
                        raise Pattern.MATCH)
            val insts = Pattern.match (#tsig(Sign.rep_sg signt)) (lhs,etat)
            val prop' = ren_inst(insts,prop,lhs,t);
            val hyps' = hyps union hypst;
            val thm' = Thm{sign=signt, hyps=hyps', prop=prop', maxidx=maxidx}
            val (lhs',rhs') = Logic.dest_equals(Logic.strip_imp_concl prop')
        in if perm andalso not(termless(rhs',lhs')) then None else
           if Logic.count_prems(prop',0) = 0
           then (trace_thm "Rewriting:" thm'; Some(hyps',rhs'))
           else (trace_thm "Trying to rewrite:" thm';
                 case prover mss thm' of
                   None       => (trace_thm "FAILED" thm'; None)
                 | Some(thm2) => check_conv(thm2,prop'))
        end

      fun rews [] = None
        | rews (rrule::rrules) =
            let val opt = rew rrule handle Pattern.MATCH => None
            in case opt of None => rews rrules | some => some end;

  in case etat of
       Abs(_,_,body) $ u => Some(hypst,subst_bounds([u], body))
     | _                 => rews(Net.match_term net etat)
  end;

(*Conversion to apply a congruence rule to a term*)
fun congc (prover,signt) {thm=cong,lhs=lhs} (hypst,t) =
  let val Thm{sign,hyps,maxidx,prop,...} = cong
      val unit = if Sign.subsig(sign,signt) then ()
                 else error("Congruence rule from different theory")
      val tsig = #tsig(Sign.rep_sg signt)
      val insts = Pattern.match tsig (lhs,t) handle Pattern.MATCH =>
                  error("Congruence rule did not match")
      val prop' = ren_inst(insts,prop,lhs,t);
      val thm' = Thm{sign=signt, hyps=hyps union hypst,
                     prop=prop', maxidx=maxidx}
      val unit = trace_thm "Applying congruence rule" thm';
      fun err() = error("Failed congruence proof!")

  in case prover thm' of
       None => err()
     | Some(thm2) => (case check_conv(thm2,prop') of
                        None => err() | some => some)
  end;



fun bottomc ((simprem,useprem),prover,sign) =
  let fun botc fail mss trec =
            (case subc mss trec of
               some as Some(trec1) =>
                 (case rewritec (prover,sign) mss trec1 of
                    Some(trec2) => botc false mss trec2
                  | None => some)
             | None =>
                 (case rewritec (prover,sign) mss trec of
                    Some(trec2) => botc false mss trec2
                  | None => if fail then None else Some(trec)))

      and try_botc mss trec = (case botc true mss trec of
                                 Some(trec1) => trec1
                               | None => trec)

      and subc (mss as Mss{net,congs,bounds,prems,mk_rews})
               (trec as (hyps,t)) =
        (case t of
            Abs(a,T,t) =>
              let val b = variant bounds a
                  val v = Free("." ^ b,T)
                  val mss' = Mss{net=net, congs=congs, bounds=b::bounds,
                                 prems=prems,mk_rews=mk_rews}
              in case botc true mss' (hyps,subst_bounds([v],t)) of
                   Some(hyps',t') =>
                     Some(hyps', Abs(a, T, abstract_over(v,t')))
                 | None => None
              end
          | t$u => (case t of
              Const("==>",_)$s  => Some(impc(hyps,s,u,mss))
            | Abs(_,_,body) =>
                let val trec = (hyps,subst_bounds([u], body))
                in case subc mss trec of
                     None => Some(trec)
                   | trec => trec
                end
            | _  =>
                let fun appc() =
                          (case botc true mss (hyps,t) of
                             Some(hyps1,t1) =>
                               (case botc true mss (hyps1,u) of
                                  Some(hyps2,u1) => Some(hyps2,t1$u1)
                                | None => Some(hyps1,t1$u))
                           | None =>
                               (case botc true mss (hyps,u) of
                                  Some(hyps1,u1) => Some(hyps1,t$u1)
                                | None => None))
                    val (h,ts) = strip_comb t
                in case h of
                     Const(a,_) =>
                       (case assoc(congs,a) of
                          None => appc()
                        | Some(cong) => congc (prover mss,sign) cong trec)
                   | _ => appc()
                end)
          | _ => None)

      and impc(hyps,s,u,mss as Mss{mk_rews,...}) =
        let val (hyps1,s1) = if simprem then try_botc mss (hyps,s)
                             else (hyps,s)
            val mss1 =
              if not useprem orelse maxidx_of_term s1 <> ~1 then mss
              else let val thm = Thm{sign=sign,hyps=[s1],prop=s1,maxidx= ~1}
                   in add_simps(add_prems(mss,[thm]), mk_rews thm) end
            val (hyps2,u1) = try_botc mss1 (hyps1,u)
            val hyps3 = if s1 mem hyps1 then hyps2 else hyps2\s1
        in (hyps3, Logic.mk_implies(s1,u1)) end

  in try_botc end;


(*** Meta-rewriting: rewrites t to u and returns the theorem t==u ***)
(* Parameters:
   mode = (simplify A, use A in simplifying B) when simplifying A ==> B
   mss: contains equality theorems of the form [|p1,...|] ==> t==u
   prover: how to solve premises in conditional rewrites and congruences
*)

(*** FIXME: check that #bounds(mss) does not "occur" in ct alread ***)
fun rewrite_cterm mode mss prover ct =
  let val {sign, t, T, maxidx} = rep_cterm ct;
      val (hyps,u) = bottomc (mode,prover,sign) mss ([],t);
      val prop = Logic.mk_equals(t,u)
  in  Thm{sign= sign, hyps= hyps, maxidx= maxidx_of_term prop, prop= prop}
  end

end;