author | berghofe |
Wed, 11 Jul 2007 11:14:51 +0200 | |
changeset 23746 | a455e69c31cc |
parent 16417 | 9bc16273c2d4 |
child 36862 | 952b2b102a0a |
permissions | -rw-r--r-- |
10875 | 1 |
(* Title: HOL/Induct/Sigma_Algebra.thy |
2 |
ID: $Id$ |
|
3 |
Author: Markus Wenzel, TU Muenchen |
|
4 |
*) |
|
5 |
||
11046
b5f5942781a0
Induct: converted some theories to new-style format;
wenzelm
parents:
10875
diff
changeset
|
6 |
header {* Sigma algebras *} |
b5f5942781a0
Induct: converted some theories to new-style format;
wenzelm
parents:
10875
diff
changeset
|
7 |
|
16417 | 8 |
theory Sigma_Algebra imports Main begin |
10875 | 9 |
|
10 |
text {* |
|
11 |
This is just a tiny example demonstrating the use of inductive |
|
12 |
definitions in classical mathematics. We define the least @{text |
|
13 |
\<sigma>}-algebra over a given set of sets. |
|
14 |
*} |
|
15 |
||
23746 | 16 |
inductive_set |
14717 | 17 |
\<sigma>_algebra :: "'a set set => 'a set set" |
23746 | 18 |
for A :: "'a set set" |
19 |
where |
|
10875 | 20 |
basic: "a \<in> A ==> a \<in> \<sigma>_algebra A" |
23746 | 21 |
| UNIV: "UNIV \<in> \<sigma>_algebra A" |
22 |
| complement: "a \<in> \<sigma>_algebra A ==> -a \<in> \<sigma>_algebra A" |
|
23 |
| Union: "(!!i::nat. a i \<in> \<sigma>_algebra A) ==> (\<Union>i. a i) \<in> \<sigma>_algebra A" |
|
10875 | 24 |
|
25 |
text {* |
|
26 |
The following basic facts are consequences of the closure properties |
|
27 |
of any @{text \<sigma>}-algebra, merely using the introduction rules, but |
|
28 |
no induction nor cases. |
|
29 |
*} |
|
30 |
||
31 |
theorem sigma_algebra_empty: "{} \<in> \<sigma>_algebra A" |
|
32 |
proof - |
|
14717 | 33 |
have "UNIV \<in> \<sigma>_algebra A" by (rule \<sigma>_algebra.UNIV) |
34 |
hence "-UNIV \<in> \<sigma>_algebra A" by (rule \<sigma>_algebra.complement) |
|
10875 | 35 |
also have "-UNIV = {}" by simp |
36 |
finally show ?thesis . |
|
37 |
qed |
|
38 |
||
39 |
theorem sigma_algebra_Inter: |
|
40 |
"(!!i::nat. a i \<in> \<sigma>_algebra A) ==> (\<Inter>i. a i) \<in> \<sigma>_algebra A" |
|
41 |
proof - |
|
42 |
assume "!!i::nat. a i \<in> \<sigma>_algebra A" |
|
14717 | 43 |
hence "!!i::nat. -(a i) \<in> \<sigma>_algebra A" by (rule \<sigma>_algebra.complement) |
44 |
hence "(\<Union>i. -(a i)) \<in> \<sigma>_algebra A" by (rule \<sigma>_algebra.Union) |
|
45 |
hence "-(\<Union>i. -(a i)) \<in> \<sigma>_algebra A" by (rule \<sigma>_algebra.complement) |
|
10875 | 46 |
also have "-(\<Union>i. -(a i)) = (\<Inter>i. a i)" by simp |
47 |
finally show ?thesis . |
|
48 |
qed |
|
49 |
||
50 |
end |