src/HOL/Finite_Set.thy

new parametricity rules and useful lemmas

(*  Title:      HOL/Finite_Set.thy
    Author:     Tobias Nipkow, Lawrence C Paulson and Markus Wenzel
                with contributions by Jeremy Avigad
*)

header {* Finite sets *}

theory Finite_Set
imports Option Power
begin

subsection {* Predicate for finite sets *}

inductive finite :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> bool"
  where
    emptyI [simp, intro!]: "finite {}"
  | insertI [simp, intro!]: "finite A \<Longrightarrow> finite (insert a A)"

simproc_setup finite_Collect ("finite (Collect P)") = {* K Set_Comprehension_Pointfree.simproc *}

lemma finite_induct [case_names empty insert, induct set: finite]:
  -- {* Discharging @{text "x \<notin> F"} entails extra work. *}
  assumes "finite F"
  assumes "P {}"
    and insert: "\<And>x F. finite F \<Longrightarrow> x \<notin> F \<Longrightarrow> P F \<Longrightarrow> P (insert x F)"
  shows "P F"
using `finite F`
proof induct
  show "P {}" by fact
  fix x F assume F: "finite F" and P: "P F"
  show "P (insert x F)"
  proof cases
    assume "x \<in> F"
    hence "insert x F = F" by (rule insert_absorb)
    with P show ?thesis by (simp only:)
  next
    assume "x \<notin> F"
    from F this P show ?thesis by (rule insert)
  qed
qed

lemma infinite_finite_induct [case_names infinite empty insert]:
  assumes infinite: "\<And>A. \<not> finite A \<Longrightarrow> P A"
  assumes empty: "P {}"
  assumes insert: "\<And>x F. finite F \<Longrightarrow> x \<notin> F \<Longrightarrow> P F \<Longrightarrow> P (insert x F)"
  shows "P A"
proof (cases "finite A")
  case False with infinite show ?thesis .
next
  case True then show ?thesis by (induct A) (fact empty insert)+
qed


subsubsection {* Choice principles *}

lemma ex_new_if_finite: -- "does not depend on def of finite at all"
  assumes "\<not> finite (UNIV :: 'a set)" and "finite A"
  shows "\<exists>a::'a. a \<notin> A"
proof -
  from assms have "A \<noteq> UNIV" by blast
  then show ?thesis by blast
qed

text {* A finite choice principle. Does not need the SOME choice operator. *}

lemma finite_set_choice:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> \<forall>x\<in>A. \<exists>y. P x y \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>f. \<forall>x\<in>A. P x (f x)"
proof (induct rule: finite_induct)
  case empty then show ?case by simp
next
  case (insert a A)
  then obtain f b where f: "ALL x:A. P x (f x)" and ab: "P a b" by auto
  show ?case (is "EX f. ?P f")
  proof
    show "?P(%x. if x = a then b else f x)" using f ab by auto
  qed
qed


subsubsection {* Finite sets are the images of initial segments of natural numbers *}

lemma finite_imp_nat_seg_image_inj_on:
  assumes "finite A" 
  shows "\<exists>(n::nat) f. A = f ` {i. i < n} \<and> inj_on f {i. i < n}"
using assms
proof induct
  case empty
  show ?case
  proof
    show "\<exists>f. {} = f ` {i::nat. i < 0} \<and> inj_on f {i. i < 0}" by simp 
  qed
next
  case (insert a A)
  have notinA: "a \<notin> A" by fact
  from insert.hyps obtain n f
    where "A = f ` {i::nat. i < n}" "inj_on f {i. i < n}" by blast
  hence "insert a A = f(n:=a) ` {i. i < Suc n}"
        "inj_on (f(n:=a)) {i. i < Suc n}" using notinA
    by (auto simp add: image_def Ball_def inj_on_def less_Suc_eq)
  thus ?case by blast
qed

lemma nat_seg_image_imp_finite:
  "A = f ` {i::nat. i < n} \<Longrightarrow> finite A"
proof (induct n arbitrary: A)
  case 0 thus ?case by simp
next
  case (Suc n)
  let ?B = "f ` {i. i < n}"
  have finB: "finite ?B" by(rule Suc.hyps[OF refl])
  show ?case
  proof cases
    assume "\<exists>k<n. f n = f k"
    hence "A = ?B" using Suc.prems by(auto simp:less_Suc_eq)
    thus ?thesis using finB by simp
  next
    assume "\<not>(\<exists> k<n. f n = f k)"
    hence "A = insert (f n) ?B" using Suc.prems by(auto simp:less_Suc_eq)
    thus ?thesis using finB by simp
  qed
qed

lemma finite_conv_nat_seg_image:
  "finite A \<longleftrightarrow> (\<exists>(n::nat) f. A = f ` {i::nat. i < n})"
  by (blast intro: nat_seg_image_imp_finite dest: finite_imp_nat_seg_image_inj_on)

lemma finite_imp_inj_to_nat_seg:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "\<exists>f n::nat. f ` A = {i. i < n} \<and> inj_on f A"
proof -
  from finite_imp_nat_seg_image_inj_on[OF `finite A`]
  obtain f and n::nat where bij: "bij_betw f {i. i<n} A"
    by (auto simp:bij_betw_def)
  let ?f = "the_inv_into {i. i<n} f"
  have "inj_on ?f A & ?f ` A = {i. i<n}"
    by (fold bij_betw_def) (rule bij_betw_the_inv_into[OF bij])
  thus ?thesis by blast
qed

lemma finite_Collect_less_nat [iff]:
  "finite {n::nat. n < k}"
  by (fastforce simp: finite_conv_nat_seg_image)

lemma finite_Collect_le_nat [iff]:
  "finite {n::nat. n \<le> k}"
  by (simp add: le_eq_less_or_eq Collect_disj_eq)


subsubsection {* Finiteness and common set operations *}

lemma rev_finite_subset:
  "finite B \<Longrightarrow> A \<subseteq> B \<Longrightarrow> finite A"
proof (induct arbitrary: A rule: finite_induct)
  case empty
  then show ?case by simp
next
  case (insert x F A)
  have A: "A \<subseteq> insert x F" and r: "A - {x} \<subseteq> F \<Longrightarrow> finite (A - {x})" by fact+
  show "finite A"
  proof cases
    assume x: "x \<in> A"
    with A have "A - {x} \<subseteq> F" by (simp add: subset_insert_iff)
    with r have "finite (A - {x})" .
    hence "finite (insert x (A - {x}))" ..
    also have "insert x (A - {x}) = A" using x by (rule insert_Diff)
    finally show ?thesis .
  next
    show "A \<subseteq> F ==> ?thesis" by fact
    assume "x \<notin> A"
    with A show "A \<subseteq> F" by (simp add: subset_insert_iff)
  qed
qed

lemma finite_subset:
  "A \<subseteq> B \<Longrightarrow> finite B \<Longrightarrow> finite A"
  by (rule rev_finite_subset)

lemma finite_UnI:
  assumes "finite F" and "finite G"
  shows "finite (F \<union> G)"
  using assms by induct simp_all

lemma finite_Un [iff]:
  "finite (F \<union> G) \<longleftrightarrow> finite F \<and> finite G"
  by (blast intro: finite_UnI finite_subset [of _ "F \<union> G"])

lemma finite_insert [simp]: "finite (insert a A) \<longleftrightarrow> finite A"
proof -
  have "finite {a} \<and> finite A \<longleftrightarrow> finite A" by simp
  then have "finite ({a} \<union> A) \<longleftrightarrow> finite A" by (simp only: finite_Un)
  then show ?thesis by simp
qed

lemma finite_Int [simp, intro]:
  "finite F \<or> finite G \<Longrightarrow> finite (F \<inter> G)"
  by (blast intro: finite_subset)

lemma finite_Collect_conjI [simp, intro]:
  "finite {x. P x} \<or> finite {x. Q x} \<Longrightarrow> finite {x. P x \<and> Q x}"
  by (simp add: Collect_conj_eq)

lemma finite_Collect_disjI [simp]:
  "finite {x. P x \<or> Q x} \<longleftrightarrow> finite {x. P x} \<and> finite {x. Q x}"
  by (simp add: Collect_disj_eq)

lemma finite_Diff [simp, intro]:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> finite (A - B)"
  by (rule finite_subset, rule Diff_subset)

lemma finite_Diff2 [simp]:
  assumes "finite B"
  shows "finite (A - B) \<longleftrightarrow> finite A"
proof -
  have "finite A \<longleftrightarrow> finite((A - B) \<union> (A \<inter> B))" by (simp add: Un_Diff_Int)
  also have "\<dots> \<longleftrightarrow> finite (A - B)" using `finite B` by simp
  finally show ?thesis ..
qed

lemma finite_Diff_insert [iff]:
  "finite (A - insert a B) \<longleftrightarrow> finite (A - B)"
proof -
  have "finite (A - B) \<longleftrightarrow> finite (A - B - {a})" by simp
  moreover have "A - insert a B = A - B - {a}" by auto
  ultimately show ?thesis by simp
qed

lemma finite_compl[simp]:
  "finite (A :: 'a set) \<Longrightarrow> finite (- A) \<longleftrightarrow> finite (UNIV :: 'a set)"
  by (simp add: Compl_eq_Diff_UNIV)

lemma finite_Collect_not[simp]:
  "finite {x :: 'a. P x} \<Longrightarrow> finite {x. \<not> P x} \<longleftrightarrow> finite (UNIV :: 'a set)"
  by (simp add: Collect_neg_eq)

lemma finite_Union [simp, intro]:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>M. M \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> finite M) \<Longrightarrow> finite(\<Union>A)"
  by (induct rule: finite_induct) simp_all

lemma finite_UN_I [intro]:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>a. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> finite (B a)) \<Longrightarrow> finite (\<Union>a\<in>A. B a)"
  by (induct rule: finite_induct) simp_all

lemma finite_UN [simp]:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> finite (UNION A B) \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>x\<in>A. finite (B x))"
  by (blast intro: finite_subset)

lemma finite_Inter [intro]:
  "\<exists>A\<in>M. finite A \<Longrightarrow> finite (\<Inter>M)"
  by (blast intro: Inter_lower finite_subset)

lemma finite_INT [intro]:
  "\<exists>x\<in>I. finite (A x) \<Longrightarrow> finite (\<Inter>x\<in>I. A x)"
  by (blast intro: INT_lower finite_subset)

lemma finite_imageI [simp, intro]:
  "finite F \<Longrightarrow> finite (h ` F)"
  by (induct rule: finite_induct) simp_all

lemma finite_image_set [simp]:
  "finite {x. P x} \<Longrightarrow> finite { f x | x. P x }"
  by (simp add: image_Collect [symmetric])

lemma finite_imageD:
  assumes "finite (f ` A)" and "inj_on f A"
  shows "finite A"
using assms
proof (induct "f ` A" arbitrary: A)
  case empty then show ?case by simp
next
  case (insert x B)
  then have B_A: "insert x B = f ` A" by simp
  then obtain y where "x = f y" and "y \<in> A" by blast
  from B_A `x \<notin> B` have "B = f ` A - {x}" by blast
  with B_A `x \<notin> B` `x = f y` `inj_on f A` `y \<in> A` have "B = f ` (A - {y})" by (simp add: inj_on_image_set_diff)
  moreover from `inj_on f A` have "inj_on f (A - {y})" by (rule inj_on_diff)
  ultimately have "finite (A - {y})" by (rule insert.hyps)
  then show "finite A" by simp
qed

lemma finite_surj:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> B \<subseteq> f ` A \<Longrightarrow> finite B"
  by (erule finite_subset) (rule finite_imageI)

lemma finite_range_imageI:
  "finite (range g) \<Longrightarrow> finite (range (\<lambda>x. f (g x)))"
  by (drule finite_imageI) (simp add: range_composition)

lemma finite_subset_image:
  assumes "finite B"
  shows "B \<subseteq> f ` A \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>C\<subseteq>A. finite C \<and> B = f ` C"
using assms
proof induct
  case empty then show ?case by simp
next
  case insert then show ?case
    by (clarsimp simp del: image_insert simp add: image_insert [symmetric])
       blast
qed

lemma finite_vimage_IntI:
  "finite F \<Longrightarrow> inj_on h A \<Longrightarrow> finite (h -` F \<inter> A)"
  apply (induct rule: finite_induct)
   apply simp_all
  apply (subst vimage_insert)
  apply (simp add: finite_subset [OF inj_on_vimage_singleton] Int_Un_distrib2)
  done

lemma finite_vimageI:
  "finite F \<Longrightarrow> inj h \<Longrightarrow> finite (h -` F)"
  using finite_vimage_IntI[of F h UNIV] by auto

lemma finite_vimageD:
  assumes fin: "finite (h -` F)" and surj: "surj h"
  shows "finite F"
proof -
  have "finite (h ` (h -` F))" using fin by (rule finite_imageI)
  also have "h ` (h -` F) = F" using surj by (rule surj_image_vimage_eq)
  finally show "finite F" .
qed

lemma finite_vimage_iff: "bij h \<Longrightarrow> finite (h -` F) \<longleftrightarrow> finite F"
  unfolding bij_def by (auto elim: finite_vimageD finite_vimageI)

lemma finite_Collect_bex [simp]:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "finite {x. \<exists>y\<in>A. Q x y} \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>y\<in>A. finite {x. Q x y})"
proof -
  have "{x. \<exists>y\<in>A. Q x y} = (\<Union>y\<in>A. {x. Q x y})" by auto
  with assms show ?thesis by simp
qed

lemma finite_Collect_bounded_ex [simp]:
  assumes "finite {y. P y}"
  shows "finite {x. \<exists>y. P y \<and> Q x y} \<longleftrightarrow> (\<forall>y. P y \<longrightarrow> finite {x. Q x y})"
proof -
  have "{x. EX y. P y & Q x y} = (\<Union>y\<in>{y. P y}. {x. Q x y})" by auto
  with assms show ?thesis by simp
qed

lemma finite_Plus:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> finite B \<Longrightarrow> finite (A <+> B)"
  by (simp add: Plus_def)

lemma finite_PlusD: 
  fixes A :: "'a set" and B :: "'b set"
  assumes fin: "finite (A <+> B)"
  shows "finite A" "finite B"
proof -
  have "Inl ` A \<subseteq> A <+> B" by auto
  then have "finite (Inl ` A :: ('a + 'b) set)" using fin by (rule finite_subset)
  then show "finite A" by (rule finite_imageD) (auto intro: inj_onI)
next
  have "Inr ` B \<subseteq> A <+> B" by auto
  then have "finite (Inr ` B :: ('a + 'b) set)" using fin by (rule finite_subset)
  then show "finite B" by (rule finite_imageD) (auto intro: inj_onI)
qed

lemma finite_Plus_iff [simp]:
  "finite (A <+> B) \<longleftrightarrow> finite A \<and> finite B"
  by (auto intro: finite_PlusD finite_Plus)

lemma finite_Plus_UNIV_iff [simp]:
  "finite (UNIV :: ('a + 'b) set) \<longleftrightarrow> finite (UNIV :: 'a set) \<and> finite (UNIV :: 'b set)"
  by (subst UNIV_Plus_UNIV [symmetric]) (rule finite_Plus_iff)

lemma finite_SigmaI [simp, intro]:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>a. a\<in>A \<Longrightarrow> finite (B a)) ==> finite (SIGMA a:A. B a)"
  by (unfold Sigma_def) blast

lemma finite_SigmaI2:
  assumes "finite {x\<in>A. B x \<noteq> {}}"
  and "\<And>a. a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> finite (B a)"
  shows "finite (Sigma A B)"
proof -
  from assms have "finite (Sigma {x\<in>A. B x \<noteq> {}} B)" by auto
  also have "Sigma {x:A. B x \<noteq> {}} B = Sigma A B" by auto
  finally show ?thesis .
qed

lemma finite_cartesian_product:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> finite B \<Longrightarrow> finite (A \<times> B)"
  by (rule finite_SigmaI)

lemma finite_Prod_UNIV:
  "finite (UNIV :: 'a set) \<Longrightarrow> finite (UNIV :: 'b set) \<Longrightarrow> finite (UNIV :: ('a \<times> 'b) set)"
  by (simp only: UNIV_Times_UNIV [symmetric] finite_cartesian_product)

lemma finite_cartesian_productD1:
  assumes "finite (A \<times> B)" and "B \<noteq> {}"
  shows "finite A"
proof -
  from assms obtain n f where "A \<times> B = f ` {i::nat. i < n}"
    by (auto simp add: finite_conv_nat_seg_image)
  then have "fst ` (A \<times> B) = fst ` f ` {i::nat. i < n}" by simp
  with `B \<noteq> {}` have "A = (fst \<circ> f) ` {i::nat. i < n}"
    by (simp add: image_compose)
  then have "\<exists>n f. A = f ` {i::nat. i < n}" by blast
  then show ?thesis
    by (auto simp add: finite_conv_nat_seg_image)
qed

lemma finite_cartesian_productD2:
  assumes "finite (A \<times> B)" and "A \<noteq> {}"
  shows "finite B"
proof -
  from assms obtain n f where "A \<times> B = f ` {i::nat. i < n}"
    by (auto simp add: finite_conv_nat_seg_image)
  then have "snd ` (A \<times> B) = snd ` f ` {i::nat. i < n}" by simp
  with `A \<noteq> {}` have "B = (snd \<circ> f) ` {i::nat. i < n}"
    by (simp add: image_compose)
  then have "\<exists>n f. B = f ` {i::nat. i < n}" by blast
  then show ?thesis
    by (auto simp add: finite_conv_nat_seg_image)
qed

lemma finite_prod: 
  "finite (UNIV :: ('a \<times> 'b) set) \<longleftrightarrow> finite (UNIV :: 'a set) \<and> finite (UNIV :: 'b set)"
by(auto simp add: UNIV_Times_UNIV[symmetric] simp del: UNIV_Times_UNIV 
   dest: finite_cartesian_productD1 finite_cartesian_productD2)

lemma finite_Pow_iff [iff]:
  "finite (Pow A) \<longleftrightarrow> finite A"
proof
  assume "finite (Pow A)"
  then have "finite ((%x. {x}) ` A)" by (blast intro: finite_subset)
  then show "finite A" by (rule finite_imageD [unfolded inj_on_def]) simp
next
  assume "finite A"
  then show "finite (Pow A)"
    by induct (simp_all add: Pow_insert)
qed

corollary finite_Collect_subsets [simp, intro]:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> finite {B. B \<subseteq> A}"
  by (simp add: Pow_def [symmetric])

lemma finite_set: "finite (UNIV :: 'a set set) \<longleftrightarrow> finite (UNIV :: 'a set)"
by(simp only: finite_Pow_iff Pow_UNIV[symmetric])

lemma finite_UnionD: "finite(\<Union>A) \<Longrightarrow> finite A"
  by (blast intro: finite_subset [OF subset_Pow_Union])

lemma finite_set_of_finite_funs: assumes "finite A" "finite B"
shows "finite{f. \<forall>x. (x \<in> A \<longrightarrow> f x \<in> B) \<and> (x \<notin> A \<longrightarrow> f x = d)}" (is "finite ?S")
proof-
  let ?F = "\<lambda>f. {(a,b). a \<in> A \<and> b = f a}"
  have "?F ` ?S \<subseteq> Pow(A \<times> B)" by auto
  from finite_subset[OF this] assms have 1: "finite (?F ` ?S)" by simp
  have 2: "inj_on ?F ?S"
    by(fastforce simp add: inj_on_def set_eq_iff fun_eq_iff)
  show ?thesis by(rule finite_imageD[OF 1 2])
qed

subsubsection {* Further induction rules on finite sets *}

lemma finite_ne_induct [case_names singleton insert, consumes 2]:
  assumes "finite F" and "F \<noteq> {}"
  assumes "\<And>x. P {x}"
    and "\<And>x F. finite F \<Longrightarrow> F \<noteq> {} \<Longrightarrow> x \<notin> F \<Longrightarrow> P F  \<Longrightarrow> P (insert x F)"
  shows "P F"
using assms
proof induct
  case empty then show ?case by simp
next
  case (insert x F) then show ?case by cases auto
qed

lemma finite_subset_induct [consumes 2, case_names empty insert]:
  assumes "finite F" and "F \<subseteq> A"
  assumes empty: "P {}"
    and insert: "\<And>a F. finite F \<Longrightarrow> a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> a \<notin> F \<Longrightarrow> P F \<Longrightarrow> P (insert a F)"
  shows "P F"
using `finite F` `F \<subseteq> A`
proof induct
  show "P {}" by fact
next
  fix x F
  assume "finite F" and "x \<notin> F" and
    P: "F \<subseteq> A \<Longrightarrow> P F" and i: "insert x F \<subseteq> A"
  show "P (insert x F)"
  proof (rule insert)
    from i show "x \<in> A" by blast
    from i have "F \<subseteq> A" by blast
    with P show "P F" .
    show "finite F" by fact
    show "x \<notin> F" by fact
  qed
qed

lemma finite_empty_induct:
  assumes "finite A"
  assumes "P A"
    and remove: "\<And>a A. finite A \<Longrightarrow> a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> P A \<Longrightarrow> P (A - {a})"
  shows "P {}"
proof -
  have "\<And>B. B \<subseteq> A \<Longrightarrow> P (A - B)"
  proof -
    fix B :: "'a set"
    assume "B \<subseteq> A"
    with `finite A` have "finite B" by (rule rev_finite_subset)
    from this `B \<subseteq> A` show "P (A - B)"
    proof induct
      case empty
      from `P A` show ?case by simp
    next
      case (insert b B)
      have "P (A - B - {b})"
      proof (rule remove)
        from `finite A` show "finite (A - B)" by induct auto
        from insert show "b \<in> A - B" by simp
        from insert show "P (A - B)" by simp
      qed
      also have "A - B - {b} = A - insert b B" by (rule Diff_insert [symmetric])
      finally show ?case .
    qed
  qed
  then have "P (A - A)" by blast
  then show ?thesis by simp
qed


subsection {* Class @{text finite}  *}

class finite =
  assumes finite_UNIV: "finite (UNIV \<Colon> 'a set)"
begin

lemma finite [simp]: "finite (A \<Colon> 'a set)"
  by (rule subset_UNIV finite_UNIV finite_subset)+

lemma finite_code [code]: "finite (A \<Colon> 'a set) \<longleftrightarrow> True"
  by simp

end

instance prod :: (finite, finite) finite
  by default (simp only: UNIV_Times_UNIV [symmetric] finite_cartesian_product finite)

lemma inj_graph: "inj (%f. {(x, y). y = f x})"
  by (rule inj_onI, auto simp add: set_eq_iff fun_eq_iff)

instance "fun" :: (finite, finite) finite
proof
  show "finite (UNIV :: ('a => 'b) set)"
  proof (rule finite_imageD)
    let ?graph = "%f::'a => 'b. {(x, y). y = f x}"
    have "range ?graph \<subseteq> Pow UNIV" by simp
    moreover have "finite (Pow (UNIV :: ('a * 'b) set))"
      by (simp only: finite_Pow_iff finite)
    ultimately show "finite (range ?graph)"
      by (rule finite_subset)
    show "inj ?graph" by (rule inj_graph)
  qed
qed

instance bool :: finite
  by default (simp add: UNIV_bool)

instance set :: (finite) finite
  by default (simp only: Pow_UNIV [symmetric] finite_Pow_iff finite)

instance unit :: finite
  by default (simp add: UNIV_unit)

instance sum :: (finite, finite) finite
  by default (simp only: UNIV_Plus_UNIV [symmetric] finite_Plus finite)

lemma finite_option_UNIV [simp]:
  "finite (UNIV :: 'a option set) = finite (UNIV :: 'a set)"
  by (auto simp add: UNIV_option_conv elim: finite_imageD intro: inj_Some)

instance option :: (finite) finite
  by default (simp add: UNIV_option_conv)


subsection {* A basic fold functional for finite sets *}

text {* The intended behaviour is
@{text "fold f z {x\<^sub>1, ..., x\<^sub>n} = f x\<^sub>1 (\<dots> (f x\<^sub>n z)\<dots>)"}
if @{text f} is ``left-commutative'':
*}

locale comp_fun_commute =
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"
  assumes comp_fun_commute: "f y \<circ> f x = f x \<circ> f y"
begin

lemma fun_left_comm: "f y (f x z) = f x (f y z)"
  using comp_fun_commute by (simp add: fun_eq_iff)

lemma commute_left_comp:
  "f y \<circ> (f x \<circ> g) = f x \<circ> (f y \<circ> g)"
  by (simp add: o_assoc comp_fun_commute)

end

inductive fold_graph :: "('a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b) \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'a set \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> bool"
for f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b" and z :: 'b where
  emptyI [intro]: "fold_graph f z {} z" |
  insertI [intro]: "x \<notin> A \<Longrightarrow> fold_graph f z A y
      \<Longrightarrow> fold_graph f z (insert x A) (f x y)"

inductive_cases empty_fold_graphE [elim!]: "fold_graph f z {} x"

definition fold :: "('a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b) \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'a set \<Rightarrow> 'b" where
  "fold f z A = (if finite A then (THE y. fold_graph f z A y) else z)"

text{*A tempting alternative for the definiens is
@{term "if finite A then THE y. fold_graph f z A y else e"}.
It allows the removal of finiteness assumptions from the theorems
@{text fold_comm}, @{text fold_reindex} and @{text fold_distrib}.
The proofs become ugly. It is not worth the effort. (???) *}

lemma finite_imp_fold_graph: "finite A \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>x. fold_graph f z A x"
by (induct rule: finite_induct) auto


subsubsection{*From @{const fold_graph} to @{term fold}*}

context comp_fun_commute
begin

lemma fold_graph_finite:
  assumes "fold_graph f z A y"
  shows "finite A"
  using assms by induct simp_all

lemma fold_graph_insertE_aux:
  "fold_graph f z A y \<Longrightarrow> a \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> \<exists>y'. y = f a y' \<and> fold_graph f z (A - {a}) y'"
proof (induct set: fold_graph)
  case (insertI x A y) show ?case
  proof (cases "x = a")
    assume "x = a" with insertI show ?case by auto
  next
    assume "x \<noteq> a"
    then obtain y' where y: "y = f a y'" and y': "fold_graph f z (A - {a}) y'"
      using insertI by auto
    have "f x y = f a (f x y')"
      unfolding y by (rule fun_left_comm)
    moreover have "fold_graph f z (insert x A - {a}) (f x y')"
      using y' and `x \<noteq> a` and `x \<notin> A`
      by (simp add: insert_Diff_if fold_graph.insertI)
    ultimately show ?case by fast
  qed
qed simp

lemma fold_graph_insertE:
  assumes "fold_graph f z (insert x A) v" and "x \<notin> A"
  obtains y where "v = f x y" and "fold_graph f z A y"
using assms by (auto dest: fold_graph_insertE_aux [OF _ insertI1])

lemma fold_graph_determ:
  "fold_graph f z A x \<Longrightarrow> fold_graph f z A y \<Longrightarrow> y = x"
proof (induct arbitrary: y set: fold_graph)
  case (insertI x A y v)
  from `fold_graph f z (insert x A) v` and `x \<notin> A`
  obtain y' where "v = f x y'" and "fold_graph f z A y'"
    by (rule fold_graph_insertE)
  from `fold_graph f z A y'` have "y' = y" by (rule insertI)
  with `v = f x y'` show "v = f x y" by simp
qed fast

lemma fold_equality:
  "fold_graph f z A y \<Longrightarrow> fold f z A = y"
  by (cases "finite A") (auto simp add: fold_def intro: fold_graph_determ dest: fold_graph_finite)

lemma fold_graph_fold:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "fold_graph f z A (fold f z A)"
proof -
  from assms have "\<exists>x. fold_graph f z A x" by (rule finite_imp_fold_graph)
  moreover note fold_graph_determ
  ultimately have "\<exists>!x. fold_graph f z A x" by (rule ex_ex1I)
  then have "fold_graph f z A (The (fold_graph f z A))" by (rule theI')
  with assms show ?thesis by (simp add: fold_def)
qed

text {* The base case for @{text fold}: *}

lemma (in -) fold_infinite [simp]:
  assumes "\<not> finite A"
  shows "fold f z A = z"
  using assms by (auto simp add: fold_def)

lemma (in -) fold_empty [simp]:
  "fold f z {} = z"
  by (auto simp add: fold_def)

text{* The various recursion equations for @{const fold}: *}

lemma fold_insert [simp]:
  assumes "finite A" and "x \<notin> A"
  shows "fold f z (insert x A) = f x (fold f z A)"
proof (rule fold_equality)
  fix z
  from `finite A` have "fold_graph f z A (fold f z A)" by (rule fold_graph_fold)
  with `x \<notin> A` have "fold_graph f z (insert x A) (f x (fold f z A))" by (rule fold_graph.insertI)
  then show "fold_graph f z (insert x A) (f x (fold f z A))" by simp
qed

declare (in -) empty_fold_graphE [rule del] fold_graph.intros [rule del]
  -- {* No more proofs involve these. *}

lemma fold_fun_left_comm:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> f x (fold f z A) = fold f (f x z) A"
proof (induct rule: finite_induct)
  case empty then show ?case by simp
next
  case (insert y A) then show ?case
    by (simp add: fun_left_comm [of x])
qed

lemma fold_insert2:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> x \<notin> A \<Longrightarrow> fold f z (insert x A)  = fold f (f x z) A"
  by (simp add: fold_fun_left_comm)

lemma fold_rec:
  assumes "finite A" and "x \<in> A"
  shows "fold f z A = f x (fold f z (A - {x}))"
proof -
  have A: "A = insert x (A - {x})" using `x \<in> A` by blast
  then have "fold f z A = fold f z (insert x (A - {x}))" by simp
  also have "\<dots> = f x (fold f z (A - {x}))"
    by (rule fold_insert) (simp add: `finite A`)+
  finally show ?thesis .
qed

lemma fold_insert_remove:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "fold f z (insert x A) = f x (fold f z (A - {x}))"
proof -
  from `finite A` have "finite (insert x A)" by auto
  moreover have "x \<in> insert x A" by auto
  ultimately have "fold f z (insert x A) = f x (fold f z (insert x A - {x}))"
    by (rule fold_rec)
  then show ?thesis by simp
qed

end

text{* Other properties of @{const fold}: *}

lemma fold_image:
  assumes "inj_on g A"
  shows "fold f z (g ` A) = fold (f \<circ> g) z A"
proof (cases "finite A")
  case False with assms show ?thesis by (auto dest: finite_imageD simp add: fold_def)
next
  case True
  have "fold_graph f z (g ` A) = fold_graph (f \<circ> g) z A"
  proof
    fix w
    show "fold_graph f z (g ` A) w \<longleftrightarrow> fold_graph (f \<circ> g) z A w" (is "?P \<longleftrightarrow> ?Q")
    proof
      assume ?P then show ?Q using assms
      proof (induct "g ` A" w arbitrary: A)
        case emptyI then show ?case by (auto intro: fold_graph.emptyI)
      next
        case (insertI x A r B)
        from `inj_on g B` `x \<notin> A` `insert x A = image g B` obtain x' A' where
          "x' \<notin> A'" and [simp]: "B = insert x' A'" "x = g x'" "A = g ` A'"
          by (rule inj_img_insertE)
        from insertI.prems have "fold_graph (f o g) z A' r"
          by (auto intro: insertI.hyps)
        with `x' \<notin> A'` have "fold_graph (f \<circ> g) z (insert x' A') ((f \<circ> g) x' r)"
          by (rule fold_graph.insertI)
        then show ?case by simp
      qed
    next
      assume ?Q then show ?P using assms
      proof induct
        case emptyI thus ?case by (auto intro: fold_graph.emptyI)
      next
        case (insertI x A r)
        from `x \<notin> A` insertI.prems have "g x \<notin> g ` A" by auto
        moreover from insertI have "fold_graph f z (g ` A) r" by simp
        ultimately have "fold_graph f z (insert (g x) (g ` A)) (f (g x) r)"
          by (rule fold_graph.insertI)
        then show ?case by simp
      qed
    qed
  qed
  with True assms show ?thesis by (auto simp add: fold_def)
qed

lemma fold_cong:
  assumes "comp_fun_commute f" "comp_fun_commute g"
  assumes "finite A" and cong: "\<And>x. x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> f x = g x"
    and "s = t" and "A = B"
  shows "fold f s A = fold g t B"
proof -
  have "fold f s A = fold g s A"  
  using `finite A` cong proof (induct A)
    case empty then show ?case by simp
  next
    case (insert x A)
    interpret f: comp_fun_commute f by (fact `comp_fun_commute f`)
    interpret g: comp_fun_commute g by (fact `comp_fun_commute g`)
    from insert show ?case by simp
  qed
  with assms show ?thesis by simp
qed


text {* A simplified version for idempotent functions: *}

locale comp_fun_idem = comp_fun_commute +
  assumes comp_fun_idem: "f x \<circ> f x = f x"
begin

lemma fun_left_idem: "f x (f x z) = f x z"
  using comp_fun_idem by (simp add: fun_eq_iff)

lemma fold_insert_idem:
  assumes fin: "finite A"
  shows "fold f z (insert x A)  = f x (fold f z A)"
proof cases
  assume "x \<in> A"
  then obtain B where "A = insert x B" and "x \<notin> B" by (rule set_insert)
  then show ?thesis using assms by (simp add: comp_fun_idem fun_left_idem)
next
  assume "x \<notin> A" then show ?thesis using assms by simp
qed

declare fold_insert [simp del] fold_insert_idem [simp]

lemma fold_insert_idem2:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> fold f z (insert x A) = fold f (f x z) A"
  by (simp add: fold_fun_left_comm)

end


subsubsection {* Liftings to @{text comp_fun_commute} etc. *}

lemma (in comp_fun_commute) comp_comp_fun_commute:
  "comp_fun_commute (f \<circ> g)"
proof
qed (simp_all add: comp_fun_commute)

lemma (in comp_fun_idem) comp_comp_fun_idem:
  "comp_fun_idem (f \<circ> g)"
  by (rule comp_fun_idem.intro, rule comp_comp_fun_commute, unfold_locales)
    (simp_all add: comp_fun_idem)

lemma (in comp_fun_commute) comp_fun_commute_funpow:
  "comp_fun_commute (\<lambda>x. f x ^^ g x)"
proof
  fix y x
  show "f y ^^ g y \<circ> f x ^^ g x = f x ^^ g x \<circ> f y ^^ g y"
  proof (cases "x = y")
    case True then show ?thesis by simp
  next
    case False show ?thesis
    proof (induct "g x" arbitrary: g)
      case 0 then show ?case by simp
    next
      case (Suc n g)
      have hyp1: "f y ^^ g y \<circ> f x = f x \<circ> f y ^^ g y"
      proof (induct "g y" arbitrary: g)
        case 0 then show ?case by simp
      next
        case (Suc n g)
        def h \<equiv> "\<lambda>z. g z - 1"
        with Suc have "n = h y" by simp
        with Suc have hyp: "f y ^^ h y \<circ> f x = f x \<circ> f y ^^ h y"
          by auto
        from Suc h_def have "g y = Suc (h y)" by simp
        then show ?case by (simp add: comp_assoc hyp)
          (simp add: o_assoc comp_fun_commute)
      qed
      def h \<equiv> "\<lambda>z. if z = x then g x - 1 else g z"
      with Suc have "n = h x" by simp
      with Suc have "f y ^^ h y \<circ> f x ^^ h x = f x ^^ h x \<circ> f y ^^ h y"
        by auto
      with False h_def have hyp2: "f y ^^ g y \<circ> f x ^^ h x = f x ^^ h x \<circ> f y ^^ g y" by simp
      from Suc h_def have "g x = Suc (h x)" by simp
      then show ?case by (simp del: funpow.simps add: funpow_Suc_right o_assoc hyp2)
        (simp add: comp_assoc hyp1)
    qed
  qed
qed


subsubsection {* Expressing set operations via @{const fold} *}

lemma comp_fun_commute_const:
  "comp_fun_commute (\<lambda>_. f)"
proof
qed rule

lemma comp_fun_idem_insert:
  "comp_fun_idem insert"
proof
qed auto

lemma comp_fun_idem_remove:
  "comp_fun_idem Set.remove"
proof
qed auto

lemma (in semilattice_inf) comp_fun_idem_inf:
  "comp_fun_idem inf"
proof
qed (auto simp add: inf_left_commute)

lemma (in semilattice_sup) comp_fun_idem_sup:
  "comp_fun_idem sup"
proof
qed (auto simp add: sup_left_commute)

lemma union_fold_insert:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "A \<union> B = fold insert B A"
proof -
  interpret comp_fun_idem insert by (fact comp_fun_idem_insert)
  from `finite A` show ?thesis by (induct A arbitrary: B) simp_all
qed

lemma minus_fold_remove:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "B - A = fold Set.remove B A"
proof -
  interpret comp_fun_idem Set.remove by (fact comp_fun_idem_remove)
  from `finite A` have "fold Set.remove B A = B - A" by (induct A arbitrary: B) auto
  then show ?thesis ..
qed

lemma comp_fun_commute_filter_fold:
  "comp_fun_commute (\<lambda>x A'. if P x then Set.insert x A' else A')"
proof - 
  interpret comp_fun_idem Set.insert by (fact comp_fun_idem_insert)
  show ?thesis by default (auto simp: fun_eq_iff)
qed

lemma Set_filter_fold:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "Set.filter P A = fold (\<lambda>x A'. if P x then Set.insert x A' else A') {} A"
using assms
by (induct A) 
  (auto simp add: Set.filter_def comp_fun_commute.fold_insert[OF comp_fun_commute_filter_fold])

lemma inter_Set_filter:     
  assumes "finite B"
  shows "A \<inter> B = Set.filter (\<lambda>x. x \<in> A) B"
using assms 
by (induct B) (auto simp: Set.filter_def)

lemma image_fold_insert:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "image f A = fold (\<lambda>k A. Set.insert (f k) A) {} A"
using assms
proof -
  interpret comp_fun_commute "\<lambda>k A. Set.insert (f k) A" by default auto
  show ?thesis using assms by (induct A) auto
qed

lemma Ball_fold:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "Ball A P = fold (\<lambda>k s. s \<and> P k) True A"
using assms
proof -
  interpret comp_fun_commute "\<lambda>k s. s \<and> P k" by default auto
  show ?thesis using assms by (induct A) auto
qed

lemma Bex_fold:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "Bex A P = fold (\<lambda>k s. s \<or> P k) False A"
using assms
proof -
  interpret comp_fun_commute "\<lambda>k s. s \<or> P k" by default auto
  show ?thesis using assms by (induct A) auto
qed

lemma comp_fun_commute_Pow_fold: 
  "comp_fun_commute (\<lambda>x A. A \<union> Set.insert x ` A)" 
  by (clarsimp simp: fun_eq_iff comp_fun_commute_def) blast

lemma Pow_fold:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "Pow A = fold (\<lambda>x A. A \<union> Set.insert x ` A) {{}} A"
using assms
proof -
  interpret comp_fun_commute "\<lambda>x A. A \<union> Set.insert x ` A" by (rule comp_fun_commute_Pow_fold)
  show ?thesis using assms by (induct A) (auto simp: Pow_insert)
qed

lemma fold_union_pair:
  assumes "finite B"
  shows "(\<Union>y\<in>B. {(x, y)}) \<union> A = fold (\<lambda>y. Set.insert (x, y)) A B"
proof -
  interpret comp_fun_commute "\<lambda>y. Set.insert (x, y)" by default auto
  show ?thesis using assms  by (induct B arbitrary: A) simp_all
qed

lemma comp_fun_commute_product_fold: 
  assumes "finite B"
  shows "comp_fun_commute (\<lambda>x z. fold (\<lambda>y. Set.insert (x, y)) z B)" 
by default (auto simp: fold_union_pair[symmetric] assms)

lemma product_fold:
  assumes "finite A"
  assumes "finite B"
  shows "A \<times> B = fold (\<lambda>x z. fold (\<lambda>y. Set.insert (x, y)) z B) {} A"
using assms unfolding Sigma_def 
by (induct A) 
  (simp_all add: comp_fun_commute.fold_insert[OF comp_fun_commute_product_fold] fold_union_pair)


context complete_lattice
begin

lemma inf_Inf_fold_inf:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "inf (Inf A) B = fold inf B A"
proof -
  interpret comp_fun_idem inf by (fact comp_fun_idem_inf)
  from `finite A` fold_fun_left_comm show ?thesis by (induct A arbitrary: B)
    (simp_all add: inf_commute fun_eq_iff)
qed

lemma sup_Sup_fold_sup:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "sup (Sup A) B = fold sup B A"
proof -
  interpret comp_fun_idem sup by (fact comp_fun_idem_sup)
  from `finite A` fold_fun_left_comm show ?thesis by (induct A arbitrary: B)
    (simp_all add: sup_commute fun_eq_iff)
qed

lemma Inf_fold_inf:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "Inf A = fold inf top A"
  using assms inf_Inf_fold_inf [of A top] by (simp add: inf_absorb2)

lemma Sup_fold_sup:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "Sup A = fold sup bot A"
  using assms sup_Sup_fold_sup [of A bot] by (simp add: sup_absorb2)

lemma inf_INF_fold_inf:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "inf B (INFI A f) = fold (inf \<circ> f) B A" (is "?inf = ?fold") 
proof (rule sym)
  interpret comp_fun_idem inf by (fact comp_fun_idem_inf)
  interpret comp_fun_idem "inf \<circ> f" by (fact comp_comp_fun_idem)
  from `finite A` show "?fold = ?inf"
    by (induct A arbitrary: B)
      (simp_all add: INF_def inf_left_commute)
qed

lemma sup_SUP_fold_sup:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "sup B (SUPR A f) = fold (sup \<circ> f) B A" (is "?sup = ?fold") 
proof (rule sym)
  interpret comp_fun_idem sup by (fact comp_fun_idem_sup)
  interpret comp_fun_idem "sup \<circ> f" by (fact comp_comp_fun_idem)
  from `finite A` show "?fold = ?sup"
    by (induct A arbitrary: B)
      (simp_all add: SUP_def sup_left_commute)
qed

lemma INF_fold_inf:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "INFI A f = fold (inf \<circ> f) top A"
  using assms inf_INF_fold_inf [of A top] by simp

lemma SUP_fold_sup:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "SUPR A f = fold (sup \<circ> f) bot A"
  using assms sup_SUP_fold_sup [of A bot] by simp

end


subsection {* Locales as mini-packages for fold operations *}

subsubsection {* The natural case *}

locale folding =
  fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'b \<Rightarrow> 'b"
  fixes z :: "'b"
  assumes comp_fun_commute: "f y \<circ> f x = f x \<circ> f y"
begin

definition F :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> 'b"
where
  eq_fold: "F A = fold f z A"

lemma empty [simp]:
  "F {} = z"
  by (simp add: eq_fold)

lemma infinite [simp]:
  "\<not> finite A \<Longrightarrow> F A = z"
  by (simp add: eq_fold)
 
lemma insert [simp]:
  assumes "finite A" and "x \<notin> A"
  shows "F (insert x A) = f x (F A)"
proof -
  interpret comp_fun_commute f
    by default (insert comp_fun_commute, simp add: fun_eq_iff)
  from fold_insert assms
  have "fold f z (insert x A) = f x (fold f z A)" by simp
  with `finite A` show ?thesis by (simp add: eq_fold fun_eq_iff)
qed
 
lemma remove:
  assumes "finite A" and "x \<in> A"
  shows "F A = f x (F (A - {x}))"
proof -
  from `x \<in> A` obtain B where A: "A = insert x B" and "x \<notin> B"
    by (auto dest: mk_disjoint_insert)
  moreover from `finite A` A have "finite B" by simp
  ultimately show ?thesis by simp
qed

lemma insert_remove:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "F (insert x A) = f x (F (A - {x}))"
  using assms by (cases "x \<in> A") (simp_all add: remove insert_absorb)

end


subsubsection {* With idempotency *}

locale folding_idem = folding +
  assumes comp_fun_idem: "f x \<circ> f x = f x"
begin

declare insert [simp del]

lemma insert_idem [simp]:
  assumes "finite A"
  shows "F (insert x A) = f x (F A)"
proof -
  interpret comp_fun_idem f
    by default (insert comp_fun_commute comp_fun_idem, simp add: fun_eq_iff)
  from fold_insert_idem assms
  have "fold f z (insert x A) = f x (fold f z A)" by simp
  with `finite A` show ?thesis by (simp add: eq_fold fun_eq_iff)
qed

end


subsection {* Finite cardinality *}

text {*
  The traditional definition
  @{prop "card A \<equiv> LEAST n. EX f. A = {f i | i. i < n}"}
  is ugly to work with.
  But now that we have @{const fold} things are easy:
*}

definition card :: "'a set \<Rightarrow> nat" where
  "card = folding.F (\<lambda>_. Suc) 0"

interpretation card!: folding "\<lambda>_. Suc" 0
where
  "folding.F (\<lambda>_. Suc) 0 = card"
proof -
  show "folding (\<lambda>_. Suc)" by default rule
  then interpret card!: folding "\<lambda>_. Suc" 0 .
  from card_def show "folding.F (\<lambda>_. Suc) 0 = card" by rule
qed

lemma card_infinite:
  "\<not> finite A \<Longrightarrow> card A = 0"
  by (fact card.infinite)

lemma card_empty:
  "card {} = 0"
  by (fact card.empty)

lemma card_insert_disjoint:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> x \<notin> A \<Longrightarrow> card (insert x A) = Suc (card A)"
  by (fact card.insert)

lemma card_insert_if:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> card (insert x A) = (if x \<in> A then card A else Suc (card A))"
  by auto (simp add: card.insert_remove card.remove)

lemma card_ge_0_finite:
  "card A > 0 \<Longrightarrow> finite A"
  by (rule ccontr) simp

lemma card_0_eq [simp, no_atp]:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> card A = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> A = {}"
  by (auto dest: mk_disjoint_insert)

lemma finite_UNIV_card_ge_0:
  "finite (UNIV :: 'a set) \<Longrightarrow> card (UNIV :: 'a set) > 0"
  by (rule ccontr) simp

lemma card_eq_0_iff:
  "card A = 0 \<longleftrightarrow> A = {} \<or> \<not> finite A"
  by auto

lemma card_gt_0_iff:
  "0 < card A \<longleftrightarrow> A \<noteq> {} \<and> finite A"
  by (simp add: neq0_conv [symmetric] card_eq_0_iff) 

lemma card_Suc_Diff1:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> Suc (card (A - {x})) = card A"
apply(rule_tac t = A in insert_Diff [THEN subst], assumption)
apply(simp del:insert_Diff_single)
done

lemma card_Diff_singleton:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> x \<in> A \<Longrightarrow> card (A - {x}) = card A - 1"
  by (simp add: card_Suc_Diff1 [symmetric])

lemma card_Diff_singleton_if:
  "finite A \<Longrightarrow> card (A - {x}) = (if x \<in> A then card A - 1 else card A)"
  by (simp add: card_Diff_singleton)

lemma card_Diff_insert[simp]:
  assumes "finite A" and "a \<in> A" and "a \<notin> B"
  shows "card (A - insert a B) = card (A - B) - 1"
proof -
  have "A - insert a B = (A - B) - {a}" using assms by blast
  then show ?thesis using assms by(simp add: card_Diff_singleton)
qed

lemma card_insert: "finite A ==> card (insert x A) = Suc (card (A - {x}))"
  by (fact card.insert_remove)

lemma card_insert_le: "finite A ==> card A <= card (insert x A)"
by (simp add: card_insert_if)

lemma card_Collect_less_nat[simp]: "card{i::nat. i < n} = n"
by (induct n) (simp_all add:less_Suc_eq Collect_disj_eq)

lemma card_Collect_le_nat[simp]: "card{i::nat. i <= n} = Suc n"
using card_Collect_less_nat[of "Suc n"] by(simp add: less_Suc_eq_le)

lemma card_mono:
  assumes "finite B" and "A \<subseteq> B"
  shows "card A \<le> card B"
proof -
  from assms have "finite A" by (auto intro: finite_subset)
  then show ?thesis using assms proof (induct A arbitrary: B)
    case empty then show ?case by simp
  next
    case (insert x A)
    then have "x \<in> B" by simp
    from insert have "A \<subseteq> B - {x}" and "finite (B - {x})" by auto
    with insert.hyps have "card A \<le> card (B - {x})" by auto
    with `finite A` `x \<notin> A` `finite B` `x \<in> B` show ?case by simp (simp only: card.remove)
  qed
qed

lemma card_seteq: "finite B ==> (!!A. A <= B ==> card B <= card A ==> A = B)"
apply (induct rule: finite_induct)
apply simp
apply clarify
apply (subgoal_tac "finite A & A - {x} <= F")
 prefer 2 apply (blast intro: finite_subset, atomize)
apply (drule_tac x = "A - {x}" in spec)
apply (simp add: card_Diff_singleton_if split add: split_if_asm)
apply (case_tac "card A", auto)
done

lemma psubset_card_mono: "finite B ==> A < B ==> card A < card B"
apply (simp add: psubset_eq linorder_not_le [symmetric])
apply (blast dest: card_seteq)
done

lemma card_Un_Int:
  assumes "finite A" and "finite B"
  shows "card A + card B = card (A \<union> B) + card (A \<inter> B)"
using assms proof (induct A)
  case empty then show ?case by simp
next
 case (insert x A) then show ?case
    by (auto simp add: insert_absorb Int_insert_left)
qed

lemma card_Un_disjoint:
  assumes "finite A" and "finite B"
  assumes "A \<inter> B = {}"
  shows "card (A \<union> B) = card A + card B"
using assms card_Un_Int [of A B] by simp

lemma card_Diff_subset:
  assumes "finite B" and "B \<subseteq> A"
  shows "card (A - B) = card A - card B"
proof (cases "finite A")
  case False with assms show ?thesis by simp
next
  case True with assms show ?thesis by (induct B arbitrary: A) simp_all
qed

lemma card_Diff_subset_Int:
  assumes AB: "finite (A \<inter> B)" shows "card (A - B) = card A - card (A \<inter> B)"
proof -
  have "A - B = A - A \<inter> B" by auto
  thus ?thesis
    by (simp add: card_Diff_subset AB) 
qed

lemma diff_card_le_card_Diff:
assumes "finite B" shows "card A - card B \<le> card(A - B)"
proof-
  have "card A - card B \<le> card A - card (A \<inter> B)"
    using card_mono[OF assms Int_lower2, of A] by arith
  also have "\<dots> = card(A-B)" using assms by(simp add: card_Diff_subset_Int)
  finally show ?thesis .
qed

lemma card_Diff1_less: "finite A ==> x: A ==> card (A - {x}) < card A"
apply (rule Suc_less_SucD)
apply (simp add: card_Suc_Diff1 del:card_Diff_insert)
done

lemma card_Diff2_less:
  "finite A ==> x: A ==> y: A ==> card (A - {x} - {y}) < card A"
apply (case_tac "x = y")
 apply (simp add: card_Diff1_less del:card_Diff_insert)
apply (rule less_trans)
 prefer 2 apply (auto intro!: card_Diff1_less simp del:card_Diff_insert)
done

lemma card_Diff1_le: "finite A ==> card (A - {x}) <= card A"
apply (case_tac "x : A")
 apply (simp_all add: card_Diff1_less less_imp_le)
done

lemma card_psubset: "finite B ==> A \<subseteq> B ==> card A < card B ==> A < B"
by (erule psubsetI, blast)

lemma insert_partition:
  "\<lbrakk> x \<notin> F; \<forall>c1 \<in> insert x F. \<forall>c2 \<in> insert x F. c1 \<noteq> c2 \<longrightarrow> c1 \<inter> c2 = {} \<rbrakk>
  \<Longrightarrow> x \<inter> \<Union> F = {}"
by auto

lemma finite_psubset_induct[consumes 1, case_names psubset]:
  assumes fin: "finite A" 
  and     major: "\<And>A. finite A \<Longrightarrow> (\<And>B. B \<subset> A \<Longrightarrow> P B) \<Longrightarrow> P A" 
  shows "P A"
using fin
proof (induct A taking: card rule: measure_induct_rule)
  case (less A)
  have fin: "finite A" by fact
  have ih: "\<And>B. \<lbrakk>card B < card A; finite B\<rbrakk> \<Longrightarrow> P B" by fact
  { fix B 
    assume asm: "B \<subset> A"
    from asm have "card B < card A" using psubset_card_mono fin by blast
    moreover
    from asm have "B \<subseteq> A" by auto
    then have "finite B" using fin finite_subset by blast
    ultimately 
    have "P B" using ih by simp
  }
  with fin show "P A" using major by blast
qed

text{* main cardinality theorem *}
lemma card_partition [rule_format]:
  "finite C ==>
     finite (\<Union> C) -->
     (\<forall>c\<in>C. card c = k) -->
     (\<forall>c1 \<in> C. \<forall>c2 \<in> C. c1 \<noteq> c2 --> c1 \<inter> c2 = {}) -->
     k * card(C) = card (\<Union> C)"
apply (erule finite_induct, simp)
apply (simp add: card_Un_disjoint insert_partition 
       finite_subset [of _ "\<Union> (insert x F)"])
done

lemma card_eq_UNIV_imp_eq_UNIV:
  assumes fin: "finite (UNIV :: 'a set)"
  and card: "card A = card (UNIV :: 'a set)"
  shows "A = (UNIV :: 'a set)"
proof
  show "A \<subseteq> UNIV" by simp
  show "UNIV \<subseteq> A"
  proof
    fix x
    show "x \<in> A"
    proof (rule ccontr)
      assume "x \<notin> A"
      then have "A \<subset> UNIV" by auto
      with fin have "card A < card (UNIV :: 'a set)" by (fact psubset_card_mono)
      with card show False by simp
    qed
  qed
qed

text{*The form of a finite set of given cardinality*}

lemma card_eq_SucD:
assumes "card A = Suc k"
shows "\<exists>b B. A = insert b B & b \<notin> B & card B = k & (k=0 \<longrightarrow> B={})"
proof -
  have fin: "finite A" using assms by (auto intro: ccontr)
  moreover have "card A \<noteq> 0" using assms by auto
  ultimately obtain b where b: "b \<in> A" by auto
  show ?thesis
  proof (intro exI conjI)
    show "A = insert b (A-{b})" using b by blast
    show "b \<notin> A - {b}" by blast
    show "card (A - {b}) = k" and "k = 0 \<longrightarrow> A - {b} = {}"
      using assms b fin by(fastforce dest:mk_disjoint_insert)+
  qed
qed

lemma card_Suc_eq:
  "(card A = Suc k) =
   (\<exists>b B. A = insert b B & b \<notin> B & card B = k & (k=0 \<longrightarrow> B={}))"
apply(rule iffI)
 apply(erule card_eq_SucD)
apply(auto)
apply(subst card.insert)
 apply(auto intro:ccontr)
done

lemma card_le_Suc_iff: "finite A \<Longrightarrow>
  Suc n \<le> card A = (\<exists>a B. A = insert a B \<and> a \<notin> B \<and> n \<le> card B \<and> finite B)"
by (fastforce simp: card_Suc_eq less_eq_nat.simps(2) insert_eq_iff
  dest: subset_singletonD split: nat.splits if_splits)

lemma finite_fun_UNIVD2:
  assumes fin: "finite (UNIV :: ('a \<Rightarrow> 'b) set)"
  shows "finite (UNIV :: 'b set)"
proof -
  from fin have "\<And>arbitrary. finite (range (\<lambda>f :: 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b. f arbitrary))"
    by (rule finite_imageI)
  moreover have "\<And>arbitrary. UNIV = range (\<lambda>f :: 'a \<Rightarrow> 'b. f arbitrary)"
    by (rule UNIV_eq_I) auto
  ultimately show "finite (UNIV :: 'b set)" by simp
qed

lemma card_UNIV_unit [simp]: "card (UNIV :: unit set) = 1"
  unfolding UNIV_unit by simp

lemma card_UNIV_bool [simp]: "card (UNIV :: bool set) = 2"
  unfolding UNIV_bool by simp


subsubsection {* Cardinality of image *}

lemma card_image_le: "finite A ==> card (f ` A) <= card A"
apply (induct rule: finite_induct)
 apply simp
apply (simp add: le_SucI card_insert_if)
done

lemma card_image:
  assumes "inj_on f A"
  shows "card (f ` A) = card A"
proof (cases "finite A")
  case True then show ?thesis using assms by (induct A) simp_all
next
  case False then have "\<not> finite (f ` A)" using assms by (auto dest: finite_imageD)
  with False show ?thesis by simp
qed

lemma bij_betw_same_card: "bij_betw f A B \<Longrightarrow> card A = card B"
by(auto simp: card_image bij_betw_def)

lemma endo_inj_surj: "finite A ==> f ` A \<subseteq> A ==> inj_on f A ==> f ` A = A"
by (simp add: card_seteq card_image)

lemma eq_card_imp_inj_on:
  "[| finite A; card(f ` A) = card A |] ==> inj_on f A"
apply (induct rule:finite_induct)
apply simp
apply(frule card_image_le[where f = f])
apply(simp add:card_insert_if split:if_splits)
done

lemma inj_on_iff_eq_card:
  "finite A ==> inj_on f A = (card(f ` A) = card A)"
by(blast intro: card_image eq_card_imp_inj_on)


lemma card_inj_on_le:
  "[|inj_on f A; f ` A \<subseteq> B; finite B |] ==> card A \<le> card B"
apply (subgoal_tac "finite A") 
 apply (force intro: card_mono simp add: card_image [symmetric])
apply (blast intro: finite_imageD dest: finite_subset) 
done

lemma card_bij_eq:
  "[|inj_on f A; f ` A \<subseteq> B; inj_on g B; g ` B \<subseteq> A;
     finite A; finite B |] ==> card A = card B"
by (auto intro: le_antisym card_inj_on_le)

lemma bij_betw_finite:
  assumes "bij_betw f A B"
  shows "finite A \<longleftrightarrow> finite B"
using assms unfolding bij_betw_def
using finite_imageD[of f A] by auto


subsubsection {* Pigeonhole Principles *}

lemma pigeonhole: "card A > card(f ` A) \<Longrightarrow> ~ inj_on f A "
by (auto dest: card_image less_irrefl_nat)

lemma pigeonhole_infinite:
assumes  "~ finite A" and "finite(f`A)"
shows "EX a0:A. ~finite{a:A. f a = f a0}"
proof -
  have "finite(f`A) \<Longrightarrow> ~ finite A \<Longrightarrow> EX a0:A. ~finite{a:A. f a = f a0}"
  proof(induct "f`A" arbitrary: A rule: finite_induct)
    case empty thus ?case by simp
  next
    case (insert b F)
    show ?case
    proof cases
      assume "finite{a:A. f a = b}"
      hence "~ finite(A - {a:A. f a = b})" using `\<not> finite A` by simp
      also have "A - {a:A. f a = b} = {a:A. f a \<noteq> b}" by blast
      finally have "~ finite({a:A. f a \<noteq> b})" .
      from insert(3)[OF _ this]
      show ?thesis using insert(2,4) by simp (blast intro: rev_finite_subset)
    next
      assume 1: "~finite{a:A. f a = b}"
      hence "{a \<in> A. f a = b} \<noteq> {}" by force
      thus ?thesis using 1 by blast
    qed
  qed
  from this[OF assms(2,1)] show ?thesis .
qed

lemma pigeonhole_infinite_rel:
assumes "~finite A" and "finite B" and "ALL a:A. EX b:B. R a b"
shows "EX b:B. ~finite{a:A. R a b}"
proof -
   let ?F = "%a. {b:B. R a b}"
   from finite_Pow_iff[THEN iffD2, OF `finite B`]
   have "finite(?F ` A)" by(blast intro: rev_finite_subset)
   from pigeonhole_infinite[where f = ?F, OF assms(1) this]
   obtain a0 where "a0\<in>A" and 1: "\<not> finite {a\<in>A. ?F a = ?F a0}" ..
   obtain b0 where "b0 : B" and "R a0 b0" using `a0:A` assms(3) by blast
   { assume "finite{a:A. R a b0}"
     then have "finite {a\<in>A. ?F a = ?F a0}"
       using `b0 : B` `R a0 b0` by(blast intro: rev_finite_subset)
   }
   with 1 `b0 : B` show ?thesis by blast
qed


subsubsection {* Cardinality of sums *}

lemma card_Plus:
  assumes "finite A" and "finite B"
  shows "card (A <+> B) = card A + card B"
proof -
  have "Inl`A \<inter> Inr`B = {}" by fast
  with assms show ?thesis
    unfolding Plus_def
    by (simp add: card_Un_disjoint card_image)
qed

lemma card_Plus_conv_if:
  "card (A <+> B) = (if finite A \<and> finite B then card A + card B else 0)"
  by (auto simp add: card_Plus)


subsubsection {* Cardinality of the Powerset *}

lemma card_Pow: "finite A ==> card (Pow A) = 2 ^ card A"
apply (induct rule: finite_induct)
 apply (simp_all add: Pow_insert)
apply (subst card_Un_disjoint, blast)
  apply (blast, blast)
apply (subgoal_tac "inj_on (insert x) (Pow F)")
 apply (subst mult_2)
 apply (simp add: card_image Pow_insert)
apply (unfold inj_on_def)
apply (blast elim!: equalityE)
done

text {* Relates to equivalence classes.  Based on a theorem of F. Kamm\"uller.  *}

lemma dvd_partition:
  "finite (Union C) ==>
    ALL c : C. k dvd card c ==>
    (ALL c1: C. ALL c2: C. c1 \<noteq> c2 --> c1 Int c2 = {}) ==>
  k dvd card (Union C)"
apply (frule finite_UnionD)
apply (rotate_tac -1)
apply (induct rule: finite_induct)
apply simp_all
apply clarify
apply (subst card_Un_disjoint)
   apply (auto simp add: disjoint_eq_subset_Compl)
done


subsubsection {* Relating injectivity and surjectivity *}

lemma finite_surj_inj: "finite A \<Longrightarrow> A \<subseteq> f ` A \<Longrightarrow> inj_on f A"
apply(rule eq_card_imp_inj_on, assumption)
apply(frule finite_imageI)
apply(drule (1) card_seteq)
 apply(erule card_image_le)
apply simp
done

lemma finite_UNIV_surj_inj: fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a"
shows "finite(UNIV:: 'a set) \<Longrightarrow> surj f \<Longrightarrow> inj f"
by (blast intro: finite_surj_inj subset_UNIV)

lemma finite_UNIV_inj_surj: fixes f :: "'a \<Rightarrow> 'a"
shows "finite(UNIV:: 'a set) \<Longrightarrow> inj f \<Longrightarrow> surj f"
by(fastforce simp:surj_def dest!: endo_inj_surj)

corollary infinite_UNIV_nat [iff]:
  "\<not> finite (UNIV :: nat set)"
proof
  assume "finite (UNIV :: nat set)"
  with finite_UNIV_inj_surj [of Suc]
  show False by simp (blast dest: Suc_neq_Zero surjD)
qed

(* Often leads to bogus ATP proofs because of reduced type information, hence no_atp *)
lemma infinite_UNIV_char_0 [no_atp]:
  "\<not> finite (UNIV :: 'a::semiring_char_0 set)"
proof
  assume "finite (UNIV :: 'a set)"
  with subset_UNIV have "finite (range of_nat :: 'a set)"
    by (rule finite_subset)
  moreover have "inj (of_nat :: nat \<Rightarrow> 'a)"
    by (simp add: inj_on_def)
  ultimately have "finite (UNIV :: nat set)"
    by (rule finite_imageD)
  then show False
    by simp
qed

hide_const (open) Finite_Set.fold

end