| author | wenzelm | 
| Fri, 02 Sep 2016 16:23:02 +0200 | |
| changeset 63773 | d1a5d10affc0 | 
| parent 62922 | 96691631c1eb | 
| child 69593 | 3dda49e08b9d | 
| permissions | -rw-r--r-- | 
| 13403 | 1 | (* Title: HOL/Extraction.thy | 
| 2 | Author: Stefan Berghofer, TU Muenchen | |
| 3 | *) | |
| 4 | ||
| 60758 | 5 | section \<open>Program extraction for HOL\<close> | 
| 13403 | 6 | |
| 15131 | 7 | theory Extraction | 
| 58112 
8081087096ad
renamed modules defining old datatypes, as a step towards having 'datatype_new' take 'datatype's place
 blanchet parents: 
55642diff
changeset | 8 | imports Option | 
| 15131 | 9 | begin | 
| 13403 | 10 | |
| 48891 | 11 | ML_file "Tools/rewrite_hol_proof.ML" | 
| 12 | ||
| 60758 | 13 | subsection \<open>Setup\<close> | 
| 13403 | 14 | |
| 60758 | 15 | setup \<open> | 
| 18708 | 16 | Extraction.add_types | 
| 29930 | 17 |       [("bool", ([], NONE))] #>
 | 
| 18708 | 18 | Extraction.set_preprocessor (fn thy => | 
| 62922 | 19 | let val ctxt = Proof_Context.init_global thy in | 
| 13403 | 20 | Proofterm.rewrite_proof_notypes | 
| 28797 
9dcd32ee5dbe
rewrite_proof: simplified simprocs (no name required);
 wenzelm parents: 
27982diff
changeset | 21 | ([], RewriteHOLProof.elim_cong :: ProofRewriteRules.rprocs true) o | 
| 17203 | 22 | Proofterm.rewrite_proof thy | 
| 37233 
b78f31ca4675
Adapted to new format of proof terms containing explicit proofs of class membership.
 berghofe parents: 
34913diff
changeset | 23 | (RewriteHOLProof.rews, | 
| 62922 | 24 | ProofRewriteRules.rprocs true @ [ProofRewriteRules.expand_of_class ctxt]) o | 
| 25 |       ProofRewriteRules.elim_vars (curry Const @{const_name default})
 | |
| 26 | end) | |
| 60758 | 27 | \<close> | 
| 13403 | 28 | |
| 29 | lemmas [extraction_expand] = | |
| 22281 | 30 | meta_spec atomize_eq atomize_all atomize_imp atomize_conj | 
| 13403 | 31 | allE rev_mp conjE Eq_TrueI Eq_FalseI eqTrueI eqTrueE eq_cong2 | 
| 20941 
beedcae49096
added eq_True eq_False True_implies_equals to extraction_expand
 haftmann parents: 
18708diff
changeset | 32 | notE' impE' impE iffE imp_cong simp_thms eq_True eq_False | 
| 18456 | 33 | induct_forall_eq induct_implies_eq induct_equal_eq induct_conj_eq | 
| 34913 | 34 | induct_atomize induct_atomize' induct_rulify induct_rulify' | 
| 35 | induct_rulify_fallback induct_trueI | |
| 60070 
73c6e58a105c
prepared for more meta-simp rules (by Stefan Berghofer)
 nipkow parents: 
59940diff
changeset | 36 | True_implies_equals implies_True_equals TrueE | 
| 60169 
5ef8ed685965
swap False to the right in assumptions to be eliminated at the right end
 nipkow parents: 
60151diff
changeset | 37 | False_implies_equals implies_False_swap | 
| 13403 | 38 | |
| 33704 
6aeb8454efc1
add_expand_thm: explicit indication of is_def instead of fragile heuristic, tuned signature;
 wenzelm parents: 
30235diff
changeset | 39 | lemmas [extraction_expand_def] = | 
| 59940 
087d81f5213e
local setup of induction tools, with restricted access to auxiliary consts;
 wenzelm parents: 
58889diff
changeset | 40 | HOL.induct_forall_def HOL.induct_implies_def HOL.induct_equal_def HOL.induct_conj_def | 
| 
087d81f5213e
local setup of induction tools, with restricted access to auxiliary consts;
 wenzelm parents: 
58889diff
changeset | 41 | HOL.induct_true_def HOL.induct_false_def | 
| 33704 
6aeb8454efc1
add_expand_thm: explicit indication of is_def instead of fragile heuristic, tuned signature;
 wenzelm parents: 
30235diff
changeset | 42 | |
| 58350 
919149921e46
added 'extraction' plugins -- this might help 'HOL-Proofs'
 blanchet parents: 
58343diff
changeset | 43 | datatype (plugins only: code extraction) sumbool = Left | Right | 
| 13403 | 44 | |
| 60758 | 45 | subsection \<open>Type of extracted program\<close> | 
| 13403 | 46 | |
| 47 | extract_type | |
| 48 | "typeof (Trueprop P) \<equiv> typeof P" | |
| 49 | ||
| 50 |   "typeof P \<equiv> Type (TYPE(Null)) \<Longrightarrow> typeof Q \<equiv> Type (TYPE('Q)) \<Longrightarrow>
 | |
| 51 |      typeof (P \<longrightarrow> Q) \<equiv> Type (TYPE('Q))"
 | |
| 52 | ||
| 53 | "typeof Q \<equiv> Type (TYPE(Null)) \<Longrightarrow> typeof (P \<longrightarrow> Q) \<equiv> Type (TYPE(Null))" | |
| 54 | ||
| 55 |   "typeof P \<equiv> Type (TYPE('P)) \<Longrightarrow> typeof Q \<equiv> Type (TYPE('Q)) \<Longrightarrow>
 | |
| 56 |      typeof (P \<longrightarrow> Q) \<equiv> Type (TYPE('P \<Rightarrow> 'Q))"
 | |
| 57 | ||
| 58 | "(\<lambda>x. typeof (P x)) \<equiv> (\<lambda>x. Type (TYPE(Null))) \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 59 | typeof (\<forall>x. P x) \<equiv> Type (TYPE(Null))" | |
| 60 | ||
| 61 |   "(\<lambda>x. typeof (P x)) \<equiv> (\<lambda>x. Type (TYPE('P))) \<Longrightarrow>
 | |
| 62 |      typeof (\<forall>x::'a. P x) \<equiv> Type (TYPE('a \<Rightarrow> 'P))"
 | |
| 63 | ||
| 64 | "(\<lambda>x. typeof (P x)) \<equiv> (\<lambda>x. Type (TYPE(Null))) \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 65 |      typeof (\<exists>x::'a. P x) \<equiv> Type (TYPE('a))"
 | |
| 66 | ||
| 67 |   "(\<lambda>x. typeof (P x)) \<equiv> (\<lambda>x. Type (TYPE('P))) \<Longrightarrow>
 | |
| 68 |      typeof (\<exists>x::'a. P x) \<equiv> Type (TYPE('a \<times> 'P))"
 | |
| 69 | ||
| 70 | "typeof P \<equiv> Type (TYPE(Null)) \<Longrightarrow> typeof Q \<equiv> Type (TYPE(Null)) \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 71 | typeof (P \<or> Q) \<equiv> Type (TYPE(sumbool))" | |
| 72 | ||
| 73 |   "typeof P \<equiv> Type (TYPE(Null)) \<Longrightarrow> typeof Q \<equiv> Type (TYPE('Q)) \<Longrightarrow>
 | |
| 74 |      typeof (P \<or> Q) \<equiv> Type (TYPE('Q option))"
 | |
| 75 | ||
| 76 |   "typeof P \<equiv> Type (TYPE('P)) \<Longrightarrow> typeof Q \<equiv> Type (TYPE(Null)) \<Longrightarrow>
 | |
| 77 |      typeof (P \<or> Q) \<equiv> Type (TYPE('P option))"
 | |
| 78 | ||
| 79 |   "typeof P \<equiv> Type (TYPE('P)) \<Longrightarrow> typeof Q \<equiv> Type (TYPE('Q)) \<Longrightarrow>
 | |
| 80 |      typeof (P \<or> Q) \<equiv> Type (TYPE('P + 'Q))"
 | |
| 81 | ||
| 82 |   "typeof P \<equiv> Type (TYPE(Null)) \<Longrightarrow> typeof Q \<equiv> Type (TYPE('Q)) \<Longrightarrow>
 | |
| 83 |      typeof (P \<and> Q) \<equiv> Type (TYPE('Q))"
 | |
| 84 | ||
| 85 |   "typeof P \<equiv> Type (TYPE('P)) \<Longrightarrow> typeof Q \<equiv> Type (TYPE(Null)) \<Longrightarrow>
 | |
| 86 |      typeof (P \<and> Q) \<equiv> Type (TYPE('P))"
 | |
| 87 | ||
| 88 |   "typeof P \<equiv> Type (TYPE('P)) \<Longrightarrow> typeof Q \<equiv> Type (TYPE('Q)) \<Longrightarrow>
 | |
| 89 |      typeof (P \<and> Q) \<equiv> Type (TYPE('P \<times> 'Q))"
 | |
| 90 | ||
| 91 | "typeof (P = Q) \<equiv> typeof ((P \<longrightarrow> Q) \<and> (Q \<longrightarrow> P))" | |
| 92 | ||
| 93 | "typeof (x \<in> P) \<equiv> typeof P" | |
| 94 | ||
| 60758 | 95 | subsection \<open>Realizability\<close> | 
| 13403 | 96 | |
| 97 | realizability | |
| 98 | "(realizes t (Trueprop P)) \<equiv> (Trueprop (realizes t P))" | |
| 99 | ||
| 100 | "(typeof P) \<equiv> (Type (TYPE(Null))) \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 101 | (realizes t (P \<longrightarrow> Q)) \<equiv> (realizes Null P \<longrightarrow> realizes t Q)" | |
| 102 | ||
| 103 |   "(typeof P) \<equiv> (Type (TYPE('P))) \<Longrightarrow>
 | |
| 104 | (typeof Q) \<equiv> (Type (TYPE(Null))) \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 105 | (realizes t (P \<longrightarrow> Q)) \<equiv> (\<forall>x::'P. realizes x P \<longrightarrow> realizes Null Q)" | |
| 106 | ||
| 107 | "(realizes t (P \<longrightarrow> Q)) \<equiv> (\<forall>x. realizes x P \<longrightarrow> realizes (t x) Q)" | |
| 108 | ||
| 109 | "(\<lambda>x. typeof (P x)) \<equiv> (\<lambda>x. Type (TYPE(Null))) \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 110 | (realizes t (\<forall>x. P x)) \<equiv> (\<forall>x. realizes Null (P x))" | |
| 111 | ||
| 112 | "(realizes t (\<forall>x. P x)) \<equiv> (\<forall>x. realizes (t x) (P x))" | |
| 113 | ||
| 114 | "(\<lambda>x. typeof (P x)) \<equiv> (\<lambda>x. Type (TYPE(Null))) \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 115 | (realizes t (\<exists>x. P x)) \<equiv> (realizes Null (P t))" | |
| 116 | ||
| 117 | "(realizes t (\<exists>x. P x)) \<equiv> (realizes (snd t) (P (fst t)))" | |
| 118 | ||
| 119 | "(typeof P) \<equiv> (Type (TYPE(Null))) \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 120 | (typeof Q) \<equiv> (Type (TYPE(Null))) \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 121 | (realizes t (P \<or> Q)) \<equiv> | |
| 122 | (case t of Left \<Rightarrow> realizes Null P | Right \<Rightarrow> realizes Null Q)" | |
| 123 | ||
| 124 | "(typeof P) \<equiv> (Type (TYPE(Null))) \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 125 | (realizes t (P \<or> Q)) \<equiv> | |
| 126 | (case t of None \<Rightarrow> realizes Null P | Some q \<Rightarrow> realizes q Q)" | |
| 127 | ||
| 128 | "(typeof Q) \<equiv> (Type (TYPE(Null))) \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 129 | (realizes t (P \<or> Q)) \<equiv> | |
| 130 | (case t of None \<Rightarrow> realizes Null Q | Some p \<Rightarrow> realizes p P)" | |
| 131 | ||
| 132 | "(realizes t (P \<or> Q)) \<equiv> | |
| 133 | (case t of Inl p \<Rightarrow> realizes p P | Inr q \<Rightarrow> realizes q Q)" | |
| 134 | ||
| 135 | "(typeof P) \<equiv> (Type (TYPE(Null))) \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 136 | (realizes t (P \<and> Q)) \<equiv> (realizes Null P \<and> realizes t Q)" | |
| 137 | ||
| 138 | "(typeof Q) \<equiv> (Type (TYPE(Null))) \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 139 | (realizes t (P \<and> Q)) \<equiv> (realizes t P \<and> realizes Null Q)" | |
| 140 | ||
| 141 | "(realizes t (P \<and> Q)) \<equiv> (realizes (fst t) P \<and> realizes (snd t) Q)" | |
| 142 | ||
| 143 | "typeof P \<equiv> Type (TYPE(Null)) \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 144 | realizes t (\<not> P) \<equiv> \<not> realizes Null P" | |
| 145 | ||
| 146 |   "typeof P \<equiv> Type (TYPE('P)) \<Longrightarrow>
 | |
| 147 | realizes t (\<not> P) \<equiv> (\<forall>x::'P. \<not> realizes x P)" | |
| 148 | ||
| 149 | "typeof (P::bool) \<equiv> Type (TYPE(Null)) \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 150 | typeof Q \<equiv> Type (TYPE(Null)) \<Longrightarrow> | |
| 151 | realizes t (P = Q) \<equiv> realizes Null P = realizes Null Q" | |
| 152 | ||
| 153 | "(realizes t (P = Q)) \<equiv> (realizes t ((P \<longrightarrow> Q) \<and> (Q \<longrightarrow> P)))" | |
| 154 | ||
| 60758 | 155 | subsection \<open>Computational content of basic inference rules\<close> | 
| 13403 | 156 | |
| 157 | theorem disjE_realizer: | |
| 158 | assumes r: "case x of Inl p \<Rightarrow> P p | Inr q \<Rightarrow> Q q" | |
| 159 | and r1: "\<And>p. P p \<Longrightarrow> R (f p)" and r2: "\<And>q. Q q \<Longrightarrow> R (g q)" | |
| 160 | shows "R (case x of Inl p \<Rightarrow> f p | Inr q \<Rightarrow> g q)" | |
| 161 | proof (cases x) | |
| 162 | case Inl | |
| 163 | with r show ?thesis by simp (rule r1) | |
| 164 | next | |
| 165 | case Inr | |
| 166 | with r show ?thesis by simp (rule r2) | |
| 167 | qed | |
| 168 | ||
| 169 | theorem disjE_realizer2: | |
| 170 | assumes r: "case x of None \<Rightarrow> P | Some q \<Rightarrow> Q q" | |
| 171 | and r1: "P \<Longrightarrow> R f" and r2: "\<And>q. Q q \<Longrightarrow> R (g q)" | |
| 172 | shows "R (case x of None \<Rightarrow> f | Some q \<Rightarrow> g q)" | |
| 173 | proof (cases x) | |
| 174 | case None | |
| 175 | with r show ?thesis by simp (rule r1) | |
| 176 | next | |
| 177 | case Some | |
| 178 | with r show ?thesis by simp (rule r2) | |
| 179 | qed | |
| 180 | ||
| 181 | theorem disjE_realizer3: | |
| 182 | assumes r: "case x of Left \<Rightarrow> P | Right \<Rightarrow> Q" | |
| 183 | and r1: "P \<Longrightarrow> R f" and r2: "Q \<Longrightarrow> R g" | |
| 184 | shows "R (case x of Left \<Rightarrow> f | Right \<Rightarrow> g)" | |
| 185 | proof (cases x) | |
| 186 | case Left | |
| 187 | with r show ?thesis by simp (rule r1) | |
| 188 | next | |
| 189 | case Right | |
| 190 | with r show ?thesis by simp (rule r2) | |
| 191 | qed | |
| 192 | ||
| 193 | theorem conjI_realizer: | |
| 194 | "P p \<Longrightarrow> Q q \<Longrightarrow> P (fst (p, q)) \<and> Q (snd (p, q))" | |
| 195 | by simp | |
| 196 | ||
| 197 | theorem exI_realizer: | |
| 13918 
2134ed516b1b
Tuned realizer for exE rule, to avoid blowup of extracted program.
 berghofe parents: 
13725diff
changeset | 198 | "P y x \<Longrightarrow> P (snd (x, y)) (fst (x, y))" by simp | 
| 
2134ed516b1b
Tuned realizer for exE rule, to avoid blowup of extracted program.
 berghofe parents: 
13725diff
changeset | 199 | |
| 
2134ed516b1b
Tuned realizer for exE rule, to avoid blowup of extracted program.
 berghofe parents: 
13725diff
changeset | 200 | theorem exE_realizer: "P (snd p) (fst p) \<Longrightarrow> | 
| 15393 | 201 | (\<And>x y. P y x \<Longrightarrow> Q (f x y)) \<Longrightarrow> Q (let (x, y) = p in f x y)" | 
| 202 | by (cases p) (simp add: Let_def) | |
| 13918 
2134ed516b1b
Tuned realizer for exE rule, to avoid blowup of extracted program.
 berghofe parents: 
13725diff
changeset | 203 | |
| 
2134ed516b1b
Tuned realizer for exE rule, to avoid blowup of extracted program.
 berghofe parents: 
13725diff
changeset | 204 | theorem exE_realizer': "P (snd p) (fst p) \<Longrightarrow> | 
| 
2134ed516b1b
Tuned realizer for exE rule, to avoid blowup of extracted program.
 berghofe parents: 
13725diff
changeset | 205 | (\<And>x y. P y x \<Longrightarrow> Q) \<Longrightarrow> Q" by (cases p) simp | 
| 13403 | 206 | |
| 207 | realizers | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 208 | impI (P, Q): "\<lambda>pq. pq" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 209 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) (d: _) P Q pq (h: _). allI \<cdot> _ \<bullet> c \<bullet> (\<^bold>\<lambda>x. impI \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (h \<cdot> x))" | 
| 13403 | 210 | |
| 211 | impI (P): "Null" | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 212 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q (h: _). allI \<cdot> _ \<bullet> c \<bullet> (\<^bold>\<lambda>x. impI \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (h \<cdot> x))" | 
| 13403 | 213 | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 214 | impI (Q): "\<lambda>q. q" "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q q. impI \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _" | 
| 13403 | 215 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 216 | impI: "Null" "impI" | 
| 13403 | 217 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 218 | mp (P, Q): "\<lambda>pq. pq" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 219 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) (d: _) P Q pq (h: _) p. mp \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (spec \<cdot> _ \<cdot> p \<bullet> c \<bullet> h)" | 
| 13403 | 220 | |
| 221 | mp (P): "Null" | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 222 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q (h: _) p. mp \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (spec \<cdot> _ \<cdot> p \<bullet> c \<bullet> h)" | 
| 13403 | 223 | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 224 | mp (Q): "\<lambda>q. q" "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q q. mp \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _" | 
| 13403 | 225 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 226 | mp: "Null" "mp" | 
| 13403 | 227 | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 228 | allI (P): "\<lambda>p. p" "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P (d: _) p. allI \<cdot> _ \<bullet> d" | 
| 13403 | 229 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 230 | allI: "Null" "allI" | 
| 13403 | 231 | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 232 | spec (P): "\<lambda>x p. p x" "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P x (d: _) p. spec \<cdot> _ \<cdot> x \<bullet> d" | 
| 13403 | 233 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 234 | spec: "Null" "spec" | 
| 13403 | 235 | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 236 | exI (P): "\<lambda>x p. (x, p)" "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P x (d: _) p. exI_realizer \<cdot> P \<cdot> p \<cdot> x \<bullet> c \<bullet> d" | 
| 13403 | 237 | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 238 | exI: "\<lambda>x. x" "\<^bold>\<lambda>P x (c: _) (h: _). h" | 
| 13403 | 239 | |
| 15393 | 240 | exE (P, Q): "\<lambda>p pq. let (x, y) = p in pq x y" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 241 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) (d: _) P Q (e: _) p (h: _) pq. exE_realizer \<cdot> P \<cdot> p \<cdot> Q \<cdot> pq \<bullet> c \<bullet> e \<bullet> d \<bullet> h" | 
| 13403 | 242 | |
| 243 | exE (P): "Null" | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 244 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q (d: _) p. exE_realizer' \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> c \<bullet> d" | 
| 13403 | 245 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 246 | exE (Q): "\<lambda>x pq. pq x" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 247 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q (d: _) x (h1: _) pq (h2: _). h2 \<cdot> x \<bullet> h1" | 
| 13403 | 248 | |
| 249 | exE: "Null" | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 250 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>P Q (c: _) x (h1: _) (h2: _). h2 \<cdot> x \<bullet> h1" | 
| 13403 | 251 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 252 | conjI (P, Q): "Pair" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 253 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) (d: _) P Q p (h: _) q. conjI_realizer \<cdot> P \<cdot> p \<cdot> Q \<cdot> q \<bullet> c \<bullet> d \<bullet> h" | 
| 13403 | 254 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 255 | conjI (P): "\<lambda>p. p" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 256 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q p. conjI \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _" | 
| 13403 | 257 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 258 | conjI (Q): "\<lambda>q. q" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 259 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q (h: _) q. conjI \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> h" | 
| 13403 | 260 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 261 | conjI: "Null" "conjI" | 
| 13403 | 262 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 263 | conjunct1 (P, Q): "fst" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 264 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) (d: _) P Q pq. conjunct1 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _" | 
| 13403 | 265 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 266 | conjunct1 (P): "\<lambda>p. p" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 267 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q p. conjunct1 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _" | 
| 13403 | 268 | |
| 269 | conjunct1 (Q): "Null" | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 270 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q q. conjunct1 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _" | 
| 13403 | 271 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 272 | conjunct1: "Null" "conjunct1" | 
| 13403 | 273 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 274 | conjunct2 (P, Q): "snd" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 275 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) (d: _) P Q pq. conjunct2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _" | 
| 13403 | 276 | |
| 277 | conjunct2 (P): "Null" | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 278 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q p. conjunct2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _" | 
| 13403 | 279 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 280 | conjunct2 (Q): "\<lambda>p. p" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 281 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q p. conjunct2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _" | 
| 13403 | 282 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 283 | conjunct2: "Null" "conjunct2" | 
| 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 284 | |
| 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 285 | disjI1 (P, Q): "Inl" | 
| 55642 
63beb38e9258
adapted to renaming of datatype 'cases' and 'recs' to 'case' and 'rec'
 blanchet parents: 
55404diff
changeset | 286 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) (d: _) P Q p. iffD2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (sum.case_1 \<cdot> P \<cdot> _ \<cdot> p \<bullet> arity_type_bool \<bullet> c \<bullet> d)" | 
| 13403 | 287 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 288 | disjI1 (P): "Some" | 
| 55642 
63beb38e9258
adapted to renaming of datatype 'cases' and 'recs' to 'case' and 'rec'
 blanchet parents: 
55404diff
changeset | 289 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q p. iffD2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (option.case_2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> P \<cdot> p \<bullet> arity_type_bool \<bullet> c)" | 
| 13403 | 290 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 291 | disjI1 (Q): "None" | 
| 55642 
63beb38e9258
adapted to renaming of datatype 'cases' and 'recs' to 'case' and 'rec'
 blanchet parents: 
55404diff
changeset | 292 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q. iffD2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (option.case_1 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> arity_type_bool \<bullet> c)" | 
| 13403 | 293 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 294 | disjI1: "Left" | 
| 55642 
63beb38e9258
adapted to renaming of datatype 'cases' and 'recs' to 'case' and 'rec'
 blanchet parents: 
55404diff
changeset | 295 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>P Q. iffD2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (sumbool.case_1 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> arity_type_bool)" | 
| 13403 | 296 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 297 | disjI2 (P, Q): "Inr" | 
| 55642 
63beb38e9258
adapted to renaming of datatype 'cases' and 'recs' to 'case' and 'rec'
 blanchet parents: 
55404diff
changeset | 298 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(d: _) (c: _) Q P q. iffD2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (sum.case_2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> Q \<cdot> q \<bullet> arity_type_bool \<bullet> c \<bullet> d)" | 
| 13403 | 299 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 300 | disjI2 (P): "None" | 
| 55642 
63beb38e9258
adapted to renaming of datatype 'cases' and 'recs' to 'case' and 'rec'
 blanchet parents: 
55404diff
changeset | 301 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) Q P. iffD2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (option.case_1 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> arity_type_bool \<bullet> c)" | 
| 13403 | 302 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 303 | disjI2 (Q): "Some" | 
| 55642 
63beb38e9258
adapted to renaming of datatype 'cases' and 'recs' to 'case' and 'rec'
 blanchet parents: 
55404diff
changeset | 304 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) Q P q. iffD2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (option.case_2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> Q \<cdot> q \<bullet> arity_type_bool \<bullet> c)" | 
| 13403 | 305 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 306 | disjI2: "Right" | 
| 55642 
63beb38e9258
adapted to renaming of datatype 'cases' and 'recs' to 'case' and 'rec'
 blanchet parents: 
55404diff
changeset | 307 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>Q P. iffD2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (sumbool.case_2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> arity_type_bool)" | 
| 13403 | 308 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 309 | disjE (P, Q, R): "\<lambda>pq pr qr. | 
| 13403 | 310 | (case pq of Inl p \<Rightarrow> pr p | Inr q \<Rightarrow> qr q)" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 311 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) (d: _) (e: _) P Q R pq (h1: _) pr (h2: _) qr. | 
| 37233 
b78f31ca4675
Adapted to new format of proof terms containing explicit proofs of class membership.
 berghofe parents: 
34913diff
changeset | 312 | disjE_realizer \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<cdot> pq \<cdot> R \<cdot> pr \<cdot> qr \<bullet> c \<bullet> d \<bullet> e \<bullet> h1 \<bullet> h2" | 
| 13403 | 313 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 314 | disjE (Q, R): "\<lambda>pq pr qr. | 
| 13403 | 315 | (case pq of None \<Rightarrow> pr | Some q \<Rightarrow> qr q)" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 316 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) (d: _) P Q R pq (h1: _) pr (h2: _) qr. | 
| 37233 
b78f31ca4675
Adapted to new format of proof terms containing explicit proofs of class membership.
 berghofe parents: 
34913diff
changeset | 317 | disjE_realizer2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<cdot> pq \<cdot> R \<cdot> pr \<cdot> qr \<bullet> c \<bullet> d \<bullet> h1 \<bullet> h2" | 
| 13403 | 318 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 319 | disjE (P, R): "\<lambda>pq pr qr. | 
| 13403 | 320 | (case pq of None \<Rightarrow> qr | Some p \<Rightarrow> pr p)" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 321 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) (d: _) P Q R pq (h1: _) pr (h2: _) qr (h3: _). | 
| 37233 
b78f31ca4675
Adapted to new format of proof terms containing explicit proofs of class membership.
 berghofe parents: 
34913diff
changeset | 322 | disjE_realizer2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<cdot> pq \<cdot> R \<cdot> qr \<cdot> pr \<bullet> c \<bullet> d \<bullet> h1 \<bullet> h3 \<bullet> h2" | 
| 13403 | 323 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 324 | disjE (R): "\<lambda>pq pr qr. | 
| 13403 | 325 | (case pq of Left \<Rightarrow> pr | Right \<Rightarrow> qr)" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 326 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q R pq (h1: _) pr (h2: _) qr. | 
| 37233 
b78f31ca4675
Adapted to new format of proof terms containing explicit proofs of class membership.
 berghofe parents: 
34913diff
changeset | 327 | disjE_realizer3 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<cdot> pq \<cdot> R \<cdot> pr \<cdot> qr \<bullet> c \<bullet> h1 \<bullet> h2" | 
| 13403 | 328 | |
| 329 | disjE (P, Q): "Null" | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 330 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) (d: _) P Q R pq. disjE_realizer \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<cdot> pq \<cdot> (\<lambda>x. R) \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> c \<bullet> d \<bullet> arity_type_bool" | 
| 13403 | 331 | |
| 332 | disjE (Q): "Null" | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 333 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q R pq. disjE_realizer2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<cdot> pq \<cdot> (\<lambda>x. R) \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> c \<bullet> arity_type_bool" | 
| 13403 | 334 | |
| 335 | disjE (P): "Null" | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 336 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q R pq (h1: _) (h2: _) (h3: _). | 
| 37233 
b78f31ca4675
Adapted to new format of proof terms containing explicit proofs of class membership.
 berghofe parents: 
34913diff
changeset | 337 | disjE_realizer2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<cdot> pq \<cdot> (\<lambda>x. R) \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> c \<bullet> arity_type_bool \<bullet> h1 \<bullet> h3 \<bullet> h2" | 
| 13403 | 338 | |
| 339 | disjE: "Null" | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 340 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>P Q R pq. disjE_realizer3 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<cdot> pq \<cdot> (\<lambda>x. R) \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> arity_type_bool" | 
| 13403 | 341 | |
| 27982 | 342 | FalseE (P): "default" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 343 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P. FalseE \<cdot> _" | 
| 13403 | 344 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 345 | FalseE: "Null" "FalseE" | 
| 13403 | 346 | |
| 347 | notI (P): "Null" | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 348 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P (h: _). allI \<cdot> _ \<bullet> c \<bullet> (\<^bold>\<lambda>x. notI \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (h \<cdot> x))" | 
| 13403 | 349 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 350 | notI: "Null" "notI" | 
| 13403 | 351 | |
| 27982 | 352 | notE (P, R): "\<lambda>p. default" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 353 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) (d: _) P R (h: _) p. notE \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (spec \<cdot> _ \<cdot> p \<bullet> c \<bullet> h)" | 
| 13403 | 354 | |
| 355 | notE (P): "Null" | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 356 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P R (h: _) p. notE \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (spec \<cdot> _ \<cdot> p \<bullet> c \<bullet> h)" | 
| 13403 | 357 | |
| 27982 | 358 | notE (R): "default" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 359 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P R. notE \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _" | 
| 13403 | 360 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 361 | notE: "Null" "notE" | 
| 13403 | 362 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 363 | subst (P): "\<lambda>s t ps. ps" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 364 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) s t P (d: _) (h: _) ps. subst \<cdot> s \<cdot> t \<cdot> P ps \<bullet> d \<bullet> h" | 
| 13403 | 365 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 366 | subst: "Null" "subst" | 
| 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 367 | |
| 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 368 | iffD1 (P, Q): "fst" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 369 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(d: _) (c: _) Q P pq (h: _) p. | 
| 37233 
b78f31ca4675
Adapted to new format of proof terms containing explicit proofs of class membership.
 berghofe parents: 
34913diff
changeset | 370 | mp \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (spec \<cdot> _ \<cdot> p \<bullet> d \<bullet> (conjunct1 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> h))" | 
| 13403 | 371 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 372 | iffD1 (P): "\<lambda>p. p" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 373 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) Q P p (h: _). mp \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (conjunct1 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> h)" | 
| 13403 | 374 | |
| 375 | iffD1 (Q): "Null" | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 376 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) Q P q1 (h: _) q2. | 
| 37233 
b78f31ca4675
Adapted to new format of proof terms containing explicit proofs of class membership.
 berghofe parents: 
34913diff
changeset | 377 | mp \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (spec \<cdot> _ \<cdot> q2 \<bullet> c \<bullet> (conjunct1 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> h))" | 
| 13403 | 378 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 379 | iffD1: "Null" "iffD1" | 
| 13403 | 380 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 381 | iffD2 (P, Q): "snd" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 382 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) (d: _) P Q pq (h: _) q. | 
| 37233 
b78f31ca4675
Adapted to new format of proof terms containing explicit proofs of class membership.
 berghofe parents: 
34913diff
changeset | 383 | mp \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (spec \<cdot> _ \<cdot> q \<bullet> d \<bullet> (conjunct2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> h))" | 
| 13403 | 384 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 385 | iffD2 (P): "\<lambda>p. p" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 386 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q p (h: _). mp \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (conjunct2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> h)" | 
| 13403 | 387 | |
| 388 | iffD2 (Q): "Null" | |
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 389 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q q1 (h: _) q2. | 
| 37233 
b78f31ca4675
Adapted to new format of proof terms containing explicit proofs of class membership.
 berghofe parents: 
34913diff
changeset | 390 | mp \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (spec \<cdot> _ \<cdot> q2 \<bullet> c \<bullet> (conjunct2 \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> h))" | 
| 13403 | 391 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 392 | iffD2: "Null" "iffD2" | 
| 13403 | 393 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 394 | iffI (P, Q): "Pair" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 395 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) (d: _) P Q pq (h1 : _) qp (h2 : _). conjI_realizer \<cdot> | 
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 396 | (\<lambda>pq. \<forall>x. P x \<longrightarrow> Q (pq x)) \<cdot> pq \<cdot> | 
| 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 397 | (\<lambda>qp. \<forall>x. Q x \<longrightarrow> P (qp x)) \<cdot> qp \<bullet> | 
| 37233 
b78f31ca4675
Adapted to new format of proof terms containing explicit proofs of class membership.
 berghofe parents: 
34913diff
changeset | 398 | (arity_type_fun \<bullet> c \<bullet> d) \<bullet> | 
| 
b78f31ca4675
Adapted to new format of proof terms containing explicit proofs of class membership.
 berghofe parents: 
34913diff
changeset | 399 | (arity_type_fun \<bullet> d \<bullet> c) \<bullet> | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 400 | (allI \<cdot> _ \<bullet> c \<bullet> (\<^bold>\<lambda>x. impI \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (h1 \<cdot> x))) \<bullet> | 
| 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 401 | (allI \<cdot> _ \<bullet> d \<bullet> (\<^bold>\<lambda>x. impI \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (h2 \<cdot> x)))" | 
| 13403 | 402 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 403 | iffI (P): "\<lambda>p. p" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 404 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q (h1 : _) p (h2 : _). conjI \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> | 
| 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 405 | (allI \<cdot> _ \<bullet> c \<bullet> (\<^bold>\<lambda>x. impI \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (h1 \<cdot> x))) \<bullet> | 
| 13403 | 406 | (impI \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> h2)" | 
| 407 | ||
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 408 | iffI (Q): "\<lambda>q. q" | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 409 | "\<^bold>\<lambda>(c: _) P Q q (h1 : _) (h2 : _). conjI \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> | 
| 13403 | 410 | (impI \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> h1) \<bullet> | 
| 52486 
b1565e37678b
just one alternative proof syntax, which also works for Proof_Syntax.pretty_proof/Proof_Syntax.read_proof roundtrip;
 wenzelm parents: 
48891diff
changeset | 411 | (allI \<cdot> _ \<bullet> c \<bullet> (\<^bold>\<lambda>x. impI \<cdot> _ \<cdot> _ \<bullet> (h2 \<cdot> x)))" | 
| 13403 | 412 | |
| 13725 
12404b452034
Changed format of realizers / correctness proofs.
 berghofe parents: 
13599diff
changeset | 413 | iffI: "Null" "iffI" | 
| 13403 | 414 | |
| 415 | end |